Learning in partnership
-
Upload
neil-g-mcpherson -
Category
Education
-
view
142 -
download
0
Transcript of Learning in partnership
Learning in Partnership
From outcome to output: reflections on curriculum reconfiguration & student-centred learning
Pt1: Reconfiguring the curriculum in the 21st century learning environment
Pt2: Locating the student as producer with Xerte
Embrace uncertainty, encourage creativity, empower the learner
Kety Faina, Gordon Heggie, Jade McCarroll, Neil McPherson
Reconfiguring the curriculum in the 21st century learning environment
massification
individualisation
commodification
commercialisation
marketisation
Challenges
Reconfiguring the curriculum in the 21st century learning environment
“What kind of world is it that curricula in higher education are preparing students for?
What kinds of capability, therefore, in general terms might curricula
be fostering?”
Barnett & Coate 2005, p. 53
Questions
Reconfiguring the curriculum in the 21st century learning environment
“…the most important obligation now confronting the nation's colleges and universities is to break out of the tired old teaching versus research debate and define, in more creative ways, what it means to be a scholar”
Boyer, 1990, p. xii
“in traditional settings there is rarely any attempt to even begin to build a community and connect students with academics. Students are kept at arms length. The connections with research…more often than not are ignored”
Brew 2002, p.51-2
Tensions
reconfiguring the curriculum
Reconfiguring the curriculum in the 21st century learning environment
Drivers
Reconfiguring the curriculum in the 21st century learning environment
Learning outcomesQuality assurance
Structure learning
Provide measure of performance
HoweverPrescriptive
Restrictive
Dampen creativity
Outcomes to outputs
Learning outputsOpen to creativity
Support originality
Builds on the work of others
Encourages critique
Open ended
See Neary, 2010
Web 1.0
Web 2.0
Web 3.0
structureddependentpassive engagement
self directedindependentactive participation self determined
interdependentactive ownership
Reconfiguring the curriculum in the 21st century learning environment
From instruction to discovery
Reconfiguring the curriculum in the 21st century learning environment
Healy & Jenkins, 2009, p. 56
“The principles of the teaching-research nexus should inform curriculum
development and delivery from the first year as a way of promoting a sense of
belonging to a community of scholars with a focus on discovery and creation of
knowledge” (Kerri-Lee Krause, 2006, pp.6-8)
"We have spent enough time condemning consumerism in education, and now
we need to articulate the alternative. Student engagement is a great concept
but it needs to be deployed to radical ends. Students as partners is not just a
nice-to-have, I believe it has the potential to help bring about social and
educational transformation”
Wenstone, VP (HE) Higher Education, NUS. 2012
Students as partners and change agents
Learning in partnership in the Social Sciences
Heggie & McPherson, 2014
“Undergraduate education…requires renewed emphasis on a point strongly made by John Dewey almost a century ago: learning is based on discovery guided by mentoring rather than on the transmission of information”
Boyer Commission 1998: 15
Engaging interdisciplinarity, active learning & co-creation
Escaping the constraints of instruction and fixed learning outcomes
Developing the Social Science Curriculum
Understanding (L7), Investigating (L8), Researching (L9)
the Social World
A template for learning
-----
Engaging discipline knowledge
Embedding interdisciplinarity
Encouraging interest-based learning
Providing authentic research experience
Integrating negotiated learning
Embracing uncertainty
Empowering learners as teachers
Supporting personal development, lifelong learning and employability
From passive reception to inquiry-based production
Level 9 research-based module - 72 students
Engaging authentic assessment with Xerte
• Embracing uncertainty• Enabling self-direction• Encouraging creativity• Empowering the learner• Embedding learning in partnership
Researching the Social World B (pilot module)
From consumer to producer, from passive to active, from container to creator
Providing peer support in a a collaborative learning environment
Encouraging staff/student & student/student partnership
Organising and providing peer support in a collaborative and creative learning environment
Learning in research mode – where the production of Xerte learning objects differs from traditional assessment methods and mechanisms
What were the challenges?
The Learner Ambassador and the Xerte Champions
What is Xerte?
Xerte is a free open source tool
Xerte allows multi media resources to be authored quickly & easily
Xerte is an interactive learning resource
Use of Xerte supports the development of digital literacies
Xerte promotes & supports accessibility and inclusivity
Source: adapted from the Xerte Homepage:http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/xerte
Does it work? What students like about Xerte
The feeling of creating a tangible object based on academic research was much more
fulfilling that the usual essay, exam, presentation
I like that its different, Powerpoint gets a bit
boring. It is more creative
You have a finished product at the end and can use it as evidence of something you
created and you cannot really do that with essays
Being able to put our ideas into it to create
a lesson for others
I like that Xerte allows you to be creative and display the assessment in creative and visual ways . [It] gives you a good feeling when you see the finished Xerte and that you helped to
create it
.
“the purposes of open-ended exploration could be puzzling and unsettling to students who held strongly reproductive conceptions of learning”
(Levy & Petrulis 2012: 96)
Providing peer support in a a collaborative learning environment
Getting used to more in class rather than lecture based learning was strange to begin with. Once I was familiar with it I felt more comfortable talking to my lecturers than with lecturers on any other modules
…while I appreciate it being student led it did feel at times that we were doing your job e.g. learning how a
Xerte works, making rubrics, figuring out how to get the
information for assessment 1
Its good that you want to encourage creativity but you are marking and your
views will inform what you think is a good layout/structure etc. students should have
this info
The peer assisted learning encouraged me to utilise
support from my peers, which has made group tasks more
enjoyable
Hard at first, getting used to something new, but the extra help from the Xerte champions being available
was encouraging
“The change that is required to address today's challenges is not vast or difficult
or expensive. It is a small thing…Simply ask, how would we do things differently
if we put learning first? Then do it….
“The problem is not insoluble. However, to paraphrase Albert Einstein, we cannot
solve our problem with the same level of thinking that created it”
(Barr & Tagg, 1996, p.xx)
We are not suggesting anything new……
Being able to take charge of my learning and actively engage with the lecturers as academic partners on my work was highly confiden[ce] building
Learning by doing. I personally…simply can't learn from the traditional talking-for-an-hour-about-new-ideas format of teaching
Perhaps we should listen to the student voice……
enjoyed being kept on our toes and encouraged to keep thinking rather than being given notes to copy.
You are more likely to remember it if you learn as you do
It facilitates learning. That's all I need in a teaching style, and the current system fails at that.
I only found it scary because I was introduced to this way of learning so late in to my degree - do it earlier!!!
i think that it is the way University should be
But, don’t just listen, let students become ‘change agents’
“The concept of ‘listening to the student voice’ – implicitly if not deliberately
– supports the perspective of student as ‘consumer’, whereas ‘students as
change agents’ explicitly supports a view of the student as ‘active
collaborator’ and ‘co-producer’, with the potential for transformation.”
Dunne & Zandstra, 2011, p.4
“It is to our own academic tradition and custom that we should look to for progressive change”
Neary, 2009, p.23