LEARNING FROM EXPERIENCE Good practices from 45 years of school feeding Marc Regnault de la Mothe...
-
Upload
shonda-watson -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of LEARNING FROM EXPERIENCE Good practices from 45 years of school feeding Marc Regnault de la Mothe...
LEARNING FROM EXPERIENCE
Good practices from 45 years of school feeding
Marc Regnault de la MothePolicy, Planning and Strategy DivisionWorld Food Programme
ANALYTICAL PROCESS AND SELECTION
Collection of all SF evaluations and case studies within WFP archive
Removal of old data and poor evaluations
Removal of redundancies (on the basis of available evidence)
33 COUNTRIES33 COUNTRIES+ workshop findings+ workshop findings
Main findings (trends, Main findings (trends, successes and constraints)successes and constraints)
Selection of nine illustrative Selection of nine illustrative case studiescase studies
134 evaluations and case studies134 evaluations and case studies
70 evaluations and 70 evaluations and case studiescase studies
33 evaluations 33 evaluations and case and case studiesstudies
POLICY IMPLICATIONSSCHOOL FEEDING QUALITY STANDARDS FOR PROGRAMME DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION
Sound alignment with the national policy framework
Stable funding and budgeting
Evidence-based programme design
Strong institutional and implementation arrangements
Strong partnerships and inter-sector coordination
Strong community participation and ownership (teachers, parents, children)
MAIN FINDINGS/1FINDING GOOD PRACTICES LESSONS LEARNED
1.Embedding school feeding in national policy frameworks
1.1 - Documenting and articulating the case for school feeding in a country
1.2 - “Being in the room” when policy decisions are made
1.3 - Facilitating discussions on school feeding with stakeholders (Pakistan)
1.1 - Governments need to consider school feeding as a priority
1.2 - Stakeholders from all sectors have to be involved (Malawi)
2.Finding interim funding solutions in view of the inclusion of school feeding in the national budget
2.1 - Ensuring agreement on milestones and timeframe for the transition (El Salvador)
2.2 - Assessing the cost of school feeding (Malawi)
2.1 - Stable and predictable funding is needed
2.2 - Finding the right balance between community participation and financing (Ethiopia)
MAIN FINDINGS/2FINDING GOOD PRACTICES LESSONS LEARNED
3.Planning handover arrangements in advance
3.1 - Involving high-level political figures to increase ownership of the programme (El Salvador)
3.2 - Enhancing local procurement to facilitate handover (Kenya)
3.1 - Need to provide guidance to country offices
3.2 - Need to coordinate parallel programmes
3.3 - Cash resources untied to tonnages delivered
4.A sound, in-depth assessment; defining objectives, targeting, and selection of modality and food basket
4.1 - Delivering a comprehensive, integrated package (Ethiopia, Lao PDR)
4.2 - Addressing gender inequality (Pakistan)
4.3 - Selecting the most appropriate modality (Afghanistan)
4.1 - Geographical targeting as opposed to individual or school-based (Kenya, Pakistan)
MAIN FINDINGS/3FINDING GOOD PRACTICES LESSONS LEARNED
5.Linking institutional set-up and implementation arrangements
5.1 - Having an institution that manages and implements school feeding with a strong inter-sector coordination (Lao PDR)
5.2 - Designing procuring and logistics arrangements (Brazil, Indonesia, Cambodia/Tanzania)
5.3 - Adapting M&E to existing systems (Kenya)
5.1 - Using school gardens mostly for educational purposes
6.Involving communities
6.1 - Using community-led planning tools (Ethiopia)
6.1 - Lack of involvement negatively affects ownership of the programme (Afghanistan)
CASE STUDIES vs. QUALITY STANDARDSQUALITY STANDARDS FOR PROGRAMME DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION COUNTRY RATIONALE
Sound alignment with the national policy framework Lao PDR A strong presence in the
policy framework
Stable funding and budgeting El Salvador Interim funding solutions for handover
Evidence-based programme design
Afghanistan Piloting different food baskets
Pakistan Tackling gender inequalities
Uganda Providing a comprehensive package
Strong institutional and implementation arrangements
Brazil A strong network of partners
Kenya Local procurement to facilitate handover
Strong partnerships and inter-sector coordination Malawi
Partnering to improve food basket, deworming and local procurement
Strong community participation and ownership (teachers, parents, children) Ethiopia Involving communities
through CHILD
THANK YOU