Lean Applications in Healthcare
Transcript of Lean Applications in Healthcare
1
1
Lean Applications in Healthcare
Muhanad Hirzallah
Mayo Clinic
2
What is Lean?
2
3
BackgroundClinical trial protocol development consists of the documentation, logistical and scientific reviews, approvals, and financial planning required for conveying a study from concept to activation and the beginning of patient accrual.Stakeholder input from verbal and formal survey information:
The process isToo slowCostlyRedundantToo many stepsDifficult to keep track
4
DMAIC Methodology
Define
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Control
What problem needs to be solved.
Compliance with the target
Best practices and deficiencies
Generate creative solutions
Monitor the improvement
3
5
ScopeMultidisciplinary – Cancer, Cardiovascular, Transplant researchMultisite – Jacksonville, Scottsdale, RochesterPrimary measure – time from protocol submission to coordinators to IRB submission.
GoalsTo reduce timeframe from 39 weeks to a maximum of:
10 weeks for internally-authored protocols.4 weeks for externally-authored protocols.
Reduce rework.Standardize, streamline, and eliminate redundancy in the protocol development process across 3 sites.Develop a system that allows the capture of data for quality assurance.
Define What problem needs to be solved.
6
Define What problem needs to be solved.
4
7
Benchmarking
DeliverablesPI ManualTraining Tools
Access database for trackingMeasurement
Readiness ChecklistDeployment Plan
All tools replicable to the research community
DefineDefine What problem needs to be solved.
8
DMAIC Methodology
Define
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Control
What problem needs to be solved.
Compliance with the target
Best practices and deficiencies
Generate creative solutions
Monitor the improvement
5
9
Measure Compliance with the target
Value Stream MapDefine and measure individual subprocessesCount the number of items in queueCalculate total process time, total actual time, and the value added ratio
Total time > 188 daysProcess time ≈ 14 daysValue added ratio ≈ 7.4%
Current State KaizensProtocol template standardizationFDF improvementsCommunication/Approvals planCommittee approvals process
10
Measure Compliance with the target
6
11
Measure Compliance with the target
Concept Approval &Protocol
8.5d 30+15d 7.7+10d 10.8+30d 4.6d 15.4+20 21.5d
1-9 hrs 1.5-24 hrs 3.5-8 hrs 6-24 hrs 0.05 hrs 18-127 hrs 1.5-8 hrs
20 days15 days 10 days 30 days
Protocol Development Coordinator
Review For Consistency & Accuracy
P/T: 1-9 hrs
Errors From Upstream: 100%
Batch Size: 1 Protocol
Staff: 22
Protocol Development Coordinator, Protocol
Coordinator, Research Secretarial Assistant
Develop Consent Form & Send to PI
Develop Budget & Send to Preaward
Develop Contract Checklist & Send to LCA
Protocol Development Coordinator, Protocol
Coordinator, Research Secretarial Assistant
Compile & Send Protocol, Budget with Consent to Peer
Review, Dept. Review, Funding Agency
Get Financial Disclosure Form & Conflict of Interest
Prepare Other Regulatory Documents
Protocol Development Coordinator, Research Secretarial Assistant
Make Changes and Respond to Peer Reviewers
11 39 10 14 28
Principal Investigator / Study Team
Communication & Approvals Plan
Standardize Coding Process Tools & Training
Protocol Development Coordinator, Research Secretarial Assistant
Update Funding Agency with Final Protocol
Sponsor Funding Agency
Protocol Development Coordinator
Data Management Services Meeting
Protocol Development Coordinator, Protocol
Coordinator
Fill in IRBe Application
IRB
6 20
P/T: 1.5-24 hrs
Errors From Upstream: 100%
Batch Size: 1 Protocol
Staff: 40
P/T: 3.5-8 hrs
Errors From Upstream: 100%
Batch Size: 1 Protocol
Staff: 40
P/T: 6-24 hrs
Errors From Upstream: 100%
Batch Size: 1 Protocol
Staff: 22
P/T: 0.05 hrs
Errors From Upstream: 100%
Batch Size: 1 Protocol
Staff: 36
P/T: 18-127 hrs
Errors From Upstream: 100%
Batch Size: 1 Protocol
Staff: 22
P/T: 1.5-8 hrs
Errors From Upstream: 100%
Batch Size: 1 Protocol
Staff: 26
Expedited IRB Review for Externally Authored
Standardize within/with Protocol Template
Financial Disclosure Form Improvements
Committee Approval Process
12
Measure Compliance with the target
7
13
DMAIC Methodology
Define
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Control
What problem needs to be solved.
Compliance with the target
Best practices and deficiencies
Generate creative solutions
Monitor the improvement
14
Root Cause AnalysisFish diagrams were used to discover the root causes of process defects as discovered through surveys and customer feedback
BrainstormingTeam members brainstormed ideas and circulated for review and approval. Higher rated ideas were given higher priority due to limited resources.
Box plotThe peer review process was measured and shown to be highly variable.
Average process time = 17 weeksRange = 1.1-49.3 weeks
Analyze Best practices and deficiencies
8
15
Analyze Best practices and deficiencies
16
Analyze Best practices and deficiencies
Time From PR to IRB/NCI Final Submission
Min(IQR): 1.11st Quartile: 7.1
Median: 13.1Mean: 17.1
3rd Quartile: 24.0Max(IQR): 49.3 1
1Minimum 1 3Minimum 1 5Minimum 1 425th 7.142857143 425th 7.142857143 625tj 7.142857143 275th 24 275th 24 625th 7.142857143 6Median 13 6Median 13 275th 24 275th 24 4
1 Max 49 4Max 49 5Max 49 3Mean 17 4
Summary Range
1.11.1
7
13
24
49
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Time From PR to IRB/NCI Final Submission
9
17
DMAIC Methodology
Define
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Control
What problem needs to be solved.
Compliance with the target
Best practices and deficiencies
Generate creative solutions
Monitor the improvement
18
Future State Value Stream Map3-4 week process First in First Out mentalityTotal process time = 4 working daysTotal wait time – Non value added essential = 10 working daysValue added ratio = 27.5%
Additional Future State KaizensClarify principal investigator rolesProvide project management training for coordinatorsImprove fist time quality (checklist creation)
Improve Generate creative solutions
10
19
Improve Generate creative solutions
Clean 9Protocol
87
10 w. days
16-22 hrs 3 hrs 8-9 hrs
Protocol Development Coordinator
Review ProtocolDevelop Consent form and email to PIPrepare LCA checklist and send to LCAStart IRBe ApplicationAsk for codesStart regulatory documents (FDF…)Add on agendas (committee, reviewers..)
P/T: 12-18 hrs
Errors From Upstream: 0%
Batch Size: 1 Protocol
Staff: 22
Multiple concurrent tasks
PI reviews consent (3 days)
Peer review (upto 10 days)
FDFs (7 days)Committee Approval (14 days)
Protocol Development Coordinator
Attend PIMConduct review meeting
Finish IRB application and submit
DMS meeting (if applicable)
Principal Investigator / Study Team
Communication & Approvals Plan
Standardize Coding Process Tools &
Training
IRB
P/T: 2 hrs
Within 14 days
P/T: 4-5 hrs
Expedited IRB Review for
Externally Authored
Standardize within/with Protocol Template
Financial Disclosure Form Improvements
Committee Approval Process
DMS Specialist
Mock up forms
P/T: 4 hrsErrors From Upstream: 0%
Batch Size: 1 Protocol
Staff: 5
FIFO
FIFO
Study Team
Review forms
P/T: 1 hr
WAIT 3 days
FIFO
Clarify PI roles
PDC training in project mgmt
Multi dept checklist for DMS
DMS Specialist/ Assistant
Combine comments & finalize forms
P/T:4hrs
FIFO
20
Step 1 Step 2 Step 31 Week 1-2 Weeks 1 Week
Step 1 Step 2 Step 31 Week 1-2 Weeks 1 Week
•Review protocol•Define study in NCCS•Complete Correlative
Research Information form
•Draft Consent and send to PI/Sponsor
•Start IRBe application•Obtain CPT codes from
sponsor (if applicable)•Start regulatory•Send out for Peer Review•Add on to PRC/HRC
agenda•LCA-drug only, no
funding
•Review protocol•Define study in NCCS•Complete Correlative
Research Information form
•Draft Consent and send to PI/Sponsor
•Start IRBe application•Obtain CPT codes from
sponsor (if applicable)•Start regulatory•Send out for Peer Review•Add on to PRC/HRC
agenda•LCA-drug only, no
funding
•PI/Sponsor Reviews Consent
•PIM Requested through MIRIS
•PRC/HRC approval obtained
•PI/Sponsor Reviews Consent
•PIM Requested through MIRIS
•PRC/HRC approval obtained
•Conduct post peer review meeting to finalize protocol (and possibly forms)
•Complete IRB application and submit – OR- NCI submission
•Attend PIM (OSPA)
•Conduct post peer review meeting to finalize protocol (and possibly forms)
•Complete IRB application and submit – OR- NCI submission
•Attend PIM (OSPA)
Improve Generate creative solutions
3 Week FIFO Process
11
21
Logistics Review MeetingReplaces Peer ReviewReplaces multiple disconnected emailsTransitions into fully electronic environmentAllows for open discussion and debateBrings in study team members from across the country and across the worldEliminates inconsistencies & contradictory languagePositive customer feedback
Improve Generate creative solutions
22
Standardized TemplatesColor coded for responsible partyReduction from 64 total templates to 22 1-on-1 PI educationAvailable to community PI upon request
Improve Generate creative solutions
12
23
Happy CustomersUltimate Goal: Accelerating the time to improve patient access to trials
Meet customer demandsImprove staff satisfaction
24
Questions
Project Process Owner:
Terre McJoynt
Unit Head, Protocol Development
Quality Improvement Advisor:
Muhanad Hirzallah
Director, Business Applications