Leading Professors: professorial academic leadership as it is perceived by ‘the led’...
description
Transcript of Leading Professors: professorial academic leadership as it is perceived by ‘the led’...
School of Education
Leading Professors: professorial academic leadership as it is perceived by ‘the led’
Quantitative survey findings
Matt Homer
Society for Research into Higher Education, February 3rd, 2012
School of Education
Overview of talk1. The survey – what does it look like and
how were respondents ‘recruited’?
2. Analysis – what methods we used?
3. The sample – who responded?
4. Select findings – what can we infer?
School of Education
1. The survey - outline Consists of ~40 items in four main sections:
Section Contents
Information about you Institution, gender, subject, career stage, HE experience
What is a professor? -- Your views
Nature of professorial role and which aspects are most important
Your experiences of professorial leadership
Numbers of staff and professors in dept., views on quality of professorial mentoring and advice
Phase 2 of our research Follow-up details for phase 2
https://www.survey.leeds.ac.uk/leading_professors
School of Education
1. The survey – securing a sample• University internal email distribution lists not
generally available • Publicising the survey link – learned societies etc
(e.g. SRHE, BELMAS, Leeds)– But this isn’t ‘representative’ at all
• Hence, ‘targeted’ emails– Unsolicited individual messages using publicly available
email sources (e.g. staff webpages)– Random in the non-technical sense– Laborious
• Estimated response rate ~30% (? )
School of Education
2. Analysis Mostly descriptive (since non-random sample)• Tables, graphs
Keep hypothesis testing (‘does this differ by that?’) to a minimum. However, have done limited testing:• Chi-square (differences in proportions), • T-tests, ANOVA (differences in mean response
across groups),• More (?): regression – what influences this
response?
School of Education
3. The sample of respondents Total number 1,223 (cut-off 12.01.12)
Characteristic Sample breakdown Interpretation
Type of institution
Pre-1992: 809 (66.1%)
Post-1992: 410 (33.5%)
Missing: 4 (0.3%)
Two-thirds from pre-1992 institutions
National figures ~ 51% ‘academics’ in post-1992s (HEFCE 2008/09) so pre-1992s over-represented in our sample
GenderMale : 587 (48.0%)
Female: 628 (51.3%)
Missing: 8 (0.7%)
Roughly balance male/female
Nationally ~ 44% female (HESA 2010/11) so females over-represented in our sample
Next: How does the sample look in more detail…
School of Education
Type of institution by genderNo association between gender and institution type
i.e. over-representation of pre-1992 institutions very similar by gender.
School of Education
Subject or discipline
Graph shows subjects with at least 10 respondents:• Education heavily
represented!• Business studies well
represented – specifically targeted to create a large ‘lead/manage’ sub-sample – see later analysis
• 68 fixed categories in all, plus 71 ‘other’ categories
101010121213141515151618191919192121212223232325303235
4248
6375
100220
0 50 100 150 200 250
Allied health professionals and studiesAnthropology
Theology, divinity and religious studiesApplied mathematics
LinguisticsSocial work and social policy & …
ChemistryArt and design
Communication, cultural and media …Electrical and electronic engineering
Mechanical, aeronautical and …Health services research
Earth systems and environmental …French
Geography and environmental studiesPhysics
Accounting and financeEconomics and econometrics
Nursing and widwiferyPolitics and international studies
ArchaeologyArchitecture and the built environment
SociologyEpidemiology and public healthEnglish language and literature
PsychologyComputer science and informatics
LawHistory
Biological sciencesOther
Business and management studiesEducation
School of Education
Current job
7
14
23
38
45
61
84
90
106
358
382
0 100 200 300 400 500
Principal research fellow
Research officer
Research assistant
Senior research fellow
Teaching fellow
Principal lecturer
Research fellow
Other
Reader
Lecturer/assistant professor
Senior lecturer/associate professor
• Dominated by lecturers/senior lecturers (over 60%)
• 69 ‘Other’ response categories including 8 heads of department
School of Education
Job – grouped• Dominated by
academics (74%)
• Researchers (14.8%)
• Teachers (3.7%)
• Other (7.4%): 69 categories 8 department heads 1 statistician(!)
45
90
181
907
0 200 400 600 800 1000
University teacher
Other
Researcher
Academic
School of Education
Job – by institution typeSignificant sub-group differences here:
• A higher percentage of academics in post-1992 intuitions
• A higher percentage of researchers in pre-1992
• National picture?
School of Education
Job – by gender
Significant differences here:
• A higher percentage of male academics
• A higher percentage of female researchers
• National picture?
School of Education
Years in university sectorMean 13.3, median 12, SD 8.3
A good spread with positive skew:
• there are a small number of respondents reporting high numbers of years in the sector – long tail – thereby pushing up the mean.
• Problematic in terms of further analysis
• Needs more work…
School of Education
4. Select findingsThe professorial role
7. Please indicate your views on each of the following statements about the professorial role and its requirements.
Do you think that a professor should:
• Very strong agreement
School of Education
Professorial role: Do you think that a professor should:
Significant differences here:
• Females a little more likely to agree
• Pre-1992s more likely to agree
School of Education
Professorial role: Do you think that a professor should:
Some differences here:
• Females a little more likely to agree
• No difference between pre- and post-1992
School of Education
Professorial role: Do you think that a professor should:
Significant differences here:
• Females a little more likely to agree
• Pre-1992s more likely to agree
School of Education
Some differences here:
• No gender difference
• Pre-1992s more likely to agree
• No Business studies ‘effect’
System of professorial mentoring ?
School of Education
No significant differences here:
• Gender, institution type, current job or Business studies.
Individual mentoring by a professor?
School of Education
Some significant differences here:
• No difference by gender
• Pre-1992 more often
• Teachers less often
• Business studies a little less often (p~0.10)
‘Excellent’ professorial leadership?
School of Education
‘Unsatisfactory’ professorial leadership?
Significant differences here:
• Males more often
• Pre-1992 more often – so more variation across pre-1992 institutions – previous slide
• Teachers a little less often
• No Business studies ‘effect’
School of Education
Comparing views on ‘Excellent’ and ‘Unsatisfactory’ professorial leadership
Some significant differences here:
• A bigger ‘gap’ in ratings for males – i.e. males more likely to report more varied experiences
• Gaps in ratings consistent across pre- and post-1992 institutions
• Lower scores correspond to more frequent such experiences
• Hence, more ‘Unsatisfactory’ experiences than ‘Excellent’.
3=‘occasionally’
School of Education
Aspiring to be a professorSignificant differences here:
• Males more likely to agree
• Pre-1992 more likely to agree
• Teachers less likely to agree
• No Business studies ‘effect’
School of Education
Professorial ‘professionalism?Some differences here:
• No gender differences
• Pre-1992 a little more favourable
• Researchers less favourable
• Business studies less favourable
School of Education
Summary• A weird but wonderful data collection methodology
• Resulting sample large, but not particularly ‘representative’
– Hence need to take care with inferences
– Could weight but probably wouldn’t make much difference
• Some interesting overall findings e.g. not a lot of professorial mentoring going on, more ‘unsatisfactory’ leadership than ‘excellent’.
• Some interesting sub-group differences e.g. staff in pre-1992 institutions have more varied experiences of leadership