“Leadership & Empowerment through Sport” (LETS) The intentions, hopes, ambitions & reality of...
-
Upload
beverly-matthews -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of “Leadership & Empowerment through Sport” (LETS) The intentions, hopes, ambitions & reality of...
“Leadership & Empowerment through Sport”(LETS)
The intentions, hopes, ambitions & reality of creating a Sport – for - Development organisation in Cape Town.
A work in progress!!
Presented at international conference :Universities developing social entrepreneurship through cross-sector collaborationYork St John University
1-3 Sept 2015
What is Sport – for – Development?
• The use of sport to facilitate social
improvement in specific communities
• The belief is that sports inherent values
can make a real contribution to change
in peoples lives
• Contested social construct
• The belief that sport has the power to
develop social capital, promote
community cohesion and contribute to
economic growth has been met with
scepticism
• A new form of ‘cultural imperialism’
What is LETS?Non profit company registered in Cape Town
South Africa
The specific objectives of the programme are:
1. To work in partnership to develop current &
future community leaders through sports
leadership and entrepreneurial programmes.
2. To create and deliver programmes that
contribute towards participant’s holistic
development.
3. To incorporate international best practice and
research to develop programmes that meet
specific individual and community requirements.
Why Cape Town?• Specific communities such as
Nyanga in Cape Town have 67%
of under 24 not in education,
employment or training
• It is the country with the highest
gap between rich and poor
• Huge social issues around social
exclusion, poverty and
educational underperformance
• ‘The Gateway to Africa’
Partnership Working & Curriculum• The Level 1 programme is designed as an introduction to sport & recreation leadership. This
programme was developed in partnership with the City of Cape Town Sport and Recreation
Department (DSRA) and was delivered as a pilot programme in July 2014 with 25 young leaders.
The Level 2 curriculum is broken into two separate strands.
• Level 2 (Leadership & Entrepreneurial) is a progression programme that focuses in more detail
on the development of a value based approach, the planning and delivery of tournaments and the
increased awareness of entrepreneurial opportunities.
• Level 2 (Coach Development) is designed for coaches already working within schools, community
clubs and community projects. The curriculum focuses on the development of a value based
approach and does not include the entrepreneurial part of the programme. This programme was
developed in partnership with the Department of Cultural Affairs & Sport (DCAS) and the initial
pilot programme was run with 20 curriculum advisors and developers in February 2014.
Methodology
The methodological approach used within this research is case study.
• LETS as an organisation is essentially a bounded entity which cannot be removed
from its contextual conditions, in depth consideration must be given to the nature of
the case including historical, physical, institutional and political contextual factors
• It is an interpretive enquiry that goes beyond the research of isolated issues and
enables an in depth study of contextual and complex issues within a specific
organisation.
• The research has been informed using a constructivist epistemology with the belief
that people effectively construct meaning of the reality that is around them. The
intention is to apply their constructed reality to the future development of the
organisation.
Data Collection stage 1 & 2
The primary data was collected at the following two pilot programmes in 2014:
• Coach Education Pilot Programme – Department of Cultural Affairs and Sport
(DCAS) – February 2014
• Young Leaders Pilot Programme – Department of Sport, Recreation and Amenities
(DSRA) – July 2014
Data was collected through interviews with support workers and managers from the
Department of Sport, Recreation (DSRA) and Amenities and the Department of Cultural
Affairs and Sport (DCAS) in Cape Town.
Questionnaires were also completed by all participants to gain a wider sense of the
potential impact. Their views were sought on the organisation, the programmes, the
potential value of this type of approach within Cape Town and their thoughts on how
the organisation could ensure its success and relevance in the future.
Results & DiscussionUnderstanding Cultural Awareness
“The issues that LETS will face in trying to reach its aims is in the way in
which it attempts to understand the culture in which it works and the
backgrounds of the participants. It needs to research local issues and
develop local based programmes” (Participant - Pilot Coach Education
Programme, 2014)
“It is important for the programme to develop in a more ‘home based’
way to show a deeper understanding of the cultural and territorial
differences within the Cape” (Participant - Pilot Coach Education
Programme, 2014)
Understanding Cultural Awareness
• Organisations looking to further their own aims and objectives are
mediated by wider social issues such as local culture, policy and an array
of different power relations (Lindsey & Grattan, 2012)
Employment – Education – Poverty – Governance – Marginalisation
• For LETS to be able to play a small part in addressing some of these
issues for the programme participants it has to do more than to be aware
of the cultural, social, economic and political issues within the
communities in which it will work. The way forward is through
engagement with local stakeholders and through the development of clear
channels of communication. It has to work with, and give a voice to the
community and develop its knowledge through participation and
engagement.
Community Engagement
“It is important to run the programme within the community
itself and to approach community leaders to engage them in the
learning process” (Participant - Pilot Coach Education
Programme, 2014)
“By establishing links with local role players such as schools,
places of worship, civic organisations, local government and
community leaders etc. by being linked with the community the
community will be more forthcoming and open up to the
programme” (Participant - Pilot Coach Education Programme,
2014)
Community EngagementThe organisation needs to be developed in a bottom up rather than top down way. A
new methodological approach is required to increase the opportunity for community
ownership
PAR - Participation enables people, through a philosophy of action, to determine
their own development and to participate meaningfully in the process of finding
their own solutions.
The intention for all future research is to move from the current interpretive
paradigm to a critical paradigm. Through this paradigm shift collaborative research
between the researcher and the participants will develop. The intention will be to
improve the experience and to provide the opportunity to empower, liberate and
raise the consciousness of both the researcher and the participants.
Curriculum Design
“What is important for us is that you look to incorporate an
entrepreneurial aspect to the programme. We want the young
people to have those skills as we feel they are lacking within the
communities” (Manager DSRA)
“I do think the recreation focus could increase. Sport programmes
are often dependent on equipment and facilities but the starting
point for a recreation can be the space and resources at their
disposal. There should be less of an emphasis on formal sport
moving more towards a ‘sport for all’ programme where rules can
be made up to suit attaining social outcomes” (Manager, DSRA)
Curriculum Design• There is the need for the curriculum to move towards a more recreational
model and away from the more sports orientated elements. Through
developing a larger focus on recreational activities there is a return to more
traditional methods of learning that have served communities well for many
centuries (Spaijj &Jeannes, 2013)
• Entrepreneurialism is highly evident within these communities but it is the
absence of developed social organisations and the lack of support available
rather than the absence of entrepreneurial energy at the personal level that
create barriers to individual progress .
• Entrepreneurialism is limited through the individualised nature of it, in the
Global North entrepreneurialism is a collective endeavor, within the Global
South the lack of a collective approach within communities has become a
bigger obstacle to economic development rather than the deficient
entrepreneurial spirit of individuals
Curriculum Design - Pedagogy
• The adoption of critical pedagogy within curriculum development is vital to ensure
the validity of the programme and the participant’s experience.
• The development of this pedagogical approach is an on-going, continuous process in
order that participants achieve a critically transitive consciousness that enables
individuals to interpret problems, develop curiosity and to reject the passive
positions that society expects of them (Freire, 1973).
• A key challenge will be to ensure that this approach is maintained in the face of
external pressures from partners, participants and funders.
• The complexities of developing in this way will be a continuous challenge; it is a
long process of change based upon international best practice, academic theory
and a continuous cycle of participatory research.
Monitoring & Evaluation
“The key issue that we had was that there was a
change to the regional boundaries in the city, we no
longer had people in place within the organisation to
monitor the young people” (Manager, DSRA)
“If I am being honest we did not know how to collect
the data that you wanted. We do not have the
resources in place to be able to monitor participants,
we were not prepared” (Manager, DSRA)
Monitoring & Evaluation
There are clear structural, economical and communication issues here which are
impacting on the need to ensure a rigorous process of monitoring and evaluation.
Without an effective system in place the future of both the partnerships and the
organisation itself are at risk.
• The difficulty of communicating with partner organisations on the other side of
the world
• The pressure that they are under with regard to other programmes
• Lack of initial planning for the collection of post programme data
• Lack of understanding as to how to collect this data.
A clear structure needs to be provided for the partner organisations as to the type
of monitoring and evaluation that is required
Future Developments – Moving Forward
• Increase cultural awareness through building and
maintaining partnerships and community engagement
• Be flexible and embrace change
• Incorporate a methodological approach of Participatory
Action Research to all future research
• The adoption of critical pedagogy within curriculum
design
• Resolve the issue of Monitoring & Evaluation
Final word
Sport can be an effective agency for enhancing social
inclusion and the five key forms of capital: human,
social, financial, physical and cultural capital (UK
Sport, 2004, p7). It can be part of the process for
development in a diverse range of environments and
circumstances but the limited evidence to support the
claim that it can produce social change ensures that
organisations must be aware of both its limitations and
its possibilities (Jarvie, 2011, p242).