7/12/2014 Americans For Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/01/leader-v-facebook-wall-of-shame.html 1/26

Attention: Searches this blog, Donna Kline Archive, FB Cover-up, Origins of Facebook's Technology and LeaderDocs.

T u e s d a y , J a n u a r y 2 9 , 2 0 1 3

LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

JUDGES GO TO JAIL FOR FAR LESS SERIOUS MISCONDUCT; FACEBOOK USERS

SHOULD PAY LEADER FEES VOLUNTARILY; ITS THE RIGHT THING TO DO SINCE

FACEBOOK STOLE THE TECHNOLOGY

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS | OPINION | AMERICANS FOR INNOVATION | JAN. 29, 2013, UPDATED FEB. 04, 2013 |

PDF

FACEBOOK GESTAPO CENSORSHIP OF LEADER V. FACEBOOK "PRIVATE"

CONVERSATIONS VERIFIED

FEB. 11, 2013 UPDATE)—AFIreceived troubling reports thisweekend that Facebook iscensoring users who are workingto publicize the Leader v.Facebook judicial corruptionscandal. In one report FacebookPREVENTED friend-ing betweena user and the Chief of Staff ofthe House of Representatives.In this report, the message fromFacebook was essentially thatthe user was limited to friend-ing friends (and not politicians).This form of censorship, if true(the news source is credible), isagainst our most fundamentalFreedom of Speech rightsembodied in the FirstAmendment of the U.S.Constitution. But of course,such conduct is consistent withthe massive abuse of rights thatwe are seeing from the federalcourts in Leader v. Facebook. Here's the comment. We suggest that readers forward thislink to decision influencers in their networks.

(FEB. 13, 2013 12:18 PM EST): AFI is receiving more verified reports of FacebookGestapo censorship of "private" conversations among Facebook users whenever the topicturns to the growing Leader v. Facebook judicial corruption scandal. We will not publish theexact contents to preserve the anonymity of the whistle blowers. Of course, readers shouldknow that the "FB Gestapo" is able to search on this simple key phrase and find EVERYconversation on the planet that has used this phrase, and then start targeting those

FIG. 1—So much for the Facebook "Open" Graph Open for who? The Facebook secretpolice? Lessons from the KGB's "Top 10 lessons learned to undermine a free market?" Ahandbook from Yuri Milner, Facebook's "Man in Moscow" (and 2nd largest shareholder)?

Remember, Milner worked for the Russian Bank Menatep, caught laundering $10 billionin Russian mob money, and diverting almost $5 billion in IMF and World Bank funds Hedid this in the years preceding his multi-billion investments in Facebook with oligarchAlisher Asmanov (and Goldman Sachs-Moscow, recipient of $X in US taxpayer bailoutfunds)

3 More Next Blog» Create Blog Sign In

7/12/2014 Americans For Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/01/leader-v-facebook-wall-of-shame.html 2/26

Judicial Facebook Love-Fest?We know at least two of the three Federal Circuitjudges in Leader v. Facebook hold Facebookstock. How many judges and staff (and theirfamil ies) at the U.S. Patent Office also holdFacebook stock? Is American jurisprudence averitable Facebook Love-Fest? Whose driving thiscorruption of previously venerable Americaninstitutions? Proof of cover-up here.

"You may not work on any matterwhere . . . you or your relativeswithin the third degree . . . could besubstantially affected by thematter's outcome." Code ofConduct 3F(2) (p. 10).

Like Facebook stock appreciation?!

individuals for censorship. This is true for any data in Facebook, including your so-called"private" conversations. Private in Facebook-speak means the exact opposite. Anyadvertiser can purchase it, and any Facebook insider can search it.Some euphemistically call this activity "data mining."

And of course, this immoral conduct is perfectly"legal." Why you ask? Because Facebook's attorneyswrote a deceptive user license agreement full ofenough twists and turns to make magician HarryHoudini blush. You agreed to hand over all your datato Facebook as the price you paid to get " free" use ofthe platform, which of course, is stolen from LeaderTechnologies. More immorality, the theft is illegal.

Immorality Illegality. Why do the Facebook userspermit such appalling abuse of rights? What does thissay about the state of morals in America? By the way,Facebook's license does say that you "own" your data .. . until you share it, then you give it up to themforever. So, since a social network is about sharing,voile, you can't take back anything you've shared witheven one other person. Therefore, you've given upeverything. Very clever, eh?

(FEB. 11, 2013 16:38 PM EST): We have just received areport that Facebook is censoring links to the page for"Lawless America" which is investigating judicialcorruption in America. This blogger has beenconversing in private chat mode with Lawless Americabefore being blocked; first sporadically, nowpermanently. So much for the "private" in private chat. We encourage our readers to followLawless America and inform them about the growing Leader v. Facebook judicial and PatentOffice corruption scandal.

"A favorite tactic of wrongdoing is misdirection. Misdirection createsquestions and doubt continuously. Your target will then spend all their timedefending against the shadows you create." —Disinformation Expert

PATENT OFFICE COVER-UP IN LEADER V. FACEBOOK

(FEB. 8, 2013 UPDATE)—The specter ofjudicial bribery is spreading to the U.S.Patent Office. AFI has just receivednew documents clearly showing acover-up. These documents need noeditorial comment. They speak forthemselves. Facebook appears to berailroading some sort of "re-examination" proceeding through theirpaid staff (and paid administrativejudges?) at the USPTO? Leader hasalready won these arguments at trialand in two reexaminations.

Click here to read the USPTO Freedomof Information Act (FOIA) Leader v.Facebook cover-up documents:GoogleDocs

The three administrative judges who approved what is in effect a FOURTH review of thesame worn out, losing Facebook prior art arguments are:

1. Judge Allen R. MacDonald

2. Judge Stephen C. Siu

3. Judge Meredith C. Petravick

Should these judges join the Wall of Shame? We invite readers to investigate these judgesand their staffs, whose names are identified on the blanked-out FOIA documents.

Facebook attorney explaining the Facebook user license in

which you gave up your rights.

Fenwick & West LLP;

Cooley Godward LLP;

Gibson Dunn LLP;

White & Case LLP;

The Federal Circuit Bar Assoc;

DC Bar Assoc;

US Supreme Court;

US Supreme Court clerks;

US Federal Circuit Clerk; and

US Federal Circuitthrough secret advocacy.

Updated Mar. 19, 2014

+11 Recommend this on Google

CONGRESS CONTACT LOOKUP

FOLLOW BY EMAIL

Email address... Submit

► 2014 (15)

▼ 2013 (28)

► December (5)

► November (4)

► October (2)

► September (4)

► August (2)

► July (2)

► June (1)

► May (1)

► April (1)

► March (1)

► February (2)

▼ January (3)

LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

SUPREME COURT USHERS IN THE TECHROBBER BARON AGE?...

LEADER V. FACEBOOK [JUSTICE] DENIED

► 2012 (6)

BLOG ARCHIVE (New, 1/20/14)

UPDATE MAR. 25, 2014

FOUR CRITICAL AFI POSTS ON JUDICIAL

COMPROMISE

Fully updated Mar. 25, 2014 in the wake ofthe Scribd censorship:

1. WAS CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS BLACKMAILED intosupporting Obamacare by his ethicalcompromises in Leader v. Facebook?

2. JUSTICE ROBERTS MENTOREDFacebook Gibson Dunn LLPattorneys.

3. JUSTICE ROBERTS HOLDSsubstantial Facebookfinancial interests.

4. JUDGE LEONARD STARK FAILED to disclose his

7/12/2014 Americans For Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/01/leader-v-facebook-wall-of-shame.html 3/26

ORIGINAL POST

(JAN. 29, 2013)—Judicial bribery appears to be all the rage inWashington these days. Therefore, should it be any surprisethat Mark Zuckerberg, the one proven guilty of infringingLeader Technologies' patent on 11 of 11 counts, would useattorneys who have no qualms about bribing federal judges?Their partners in Moscow certainly know how it works. It's astrategic warfare tactic they developed called "lawfare" tocorrupt the American judicial system. Interesting question.

Facebook's main law firms involved in Leader v. Facebook areGibson Dunn LLP, Cooley Godward LLP and White & Case LLP,not to mention that Facebook's inside counsel SamuelO'Rourke worked previously for Heidi Keefe and MarkWeinstein at White & Case. The other three attorneys that play prominently in this case areGibson Dunn's Thomas Hungar (also Microsoft's attorney), Cooley's Jeffrey Norberg andMichael Rhodes. Directing the whole effort is Facebook's attorney Theodore Ullyot who madeout like a bandit in the Facebook IPO. Oh by the way, did we talk about the cozy relationshipbetween these lawyers and The Federal Circuit Bar Association . . . and Supreme Courtclerks?

Judicial bribery and payoffs in Leader v. Facebookseem all but certain considering the breadth anddepth of the collective misconduct. It seems thatthese judges would have had no other motive thanmoney to hand Facebook its dubious victory based onlies and turning blind eyes. They risked lifeappointments. See Wall of Shame below. If they haverisked their jobs for Facebook, there must be anawfully big reward waiting somewhere. Students ofFacebook speculate that there must be hundreds ifnot thousands of these accounts somewhere. They

appear to have bought a lot of silence in the Caymans, Dubai, Bermuda, Moscow, Singapore,Hong Kong? The deeper this scandal gets, the more the mind wanders. You'll have to decidefor yourself.

WHERE MIGHT THE FUNDS BE PARKED?

It is public knowledge that Moscow-based DST (aka Digital Sky, aka Mail.ru, aka Yuri Milner)has a full time former Goldman Sachs executive named Alexander Tamas living in Dubai.Tamas moved from Goldman Sachs to DST in London just months before Goldman Sachsreceived approximately $16 billion in taxpayer bailout funds, managed by President Obama'sbailout appointee, Lawrence H. "Larry" Summers. Milner and Facebook COO Sheryl K.Sanders are protégés of Summers from his World Bank days in the early 1990's. Within aboutsix months of the bailout, some $3 billion flowed in from Milner/DST and others overseas topurchase Facebook insider stock. Zuckerberg's former speech writer says in Boy Kings thatthe Facebook employees were strongly encouraged to sell, then they were effectivelymuzzled (Katherine Losse, 2012: "no one asked if the Russian's money was clean . . . no onewanted or was allowed to know") when they questioned these dubious Russian transactions.American investors were locked out. All coincidences, of course.

Judges who accept bribes and givers of bribes should go to jail. For example, formerattorney Paul Minor and former judges Wes Teel and John Whitfield are serving sentencesfor corruption and racketeering after Minor backed loans to the judges in exchange forfavorable court rulings. See “Corrupt Mississippi Judges and Former-Attorney who Bribedthem Head Back to Prison. Bad Lawyer, Jun. 14, 2011.

FACEBOOK'S OFFER TO THE LEADER V. FACEBOOK JUDGES: STOCK VALUE

APPRECIATION IN EXCHANGE FOR A FAVORABLE RULING?

Given the way in which the Federal Circuit decisions were timed to Facebook-friendlyevents, like the beginning of their IPO road show, and a national Fox Business interviewwith Leader's Michael McKibben, the Court-Facebook love-fest is apparent. Of course, theysay its all coincidence. Yeh, right.

Promises of Facebook stock appreciation from the IPO in exchange for a favorable Leader v.Facebook ruling would be a strong motive for corruption, especially if you are arrogant

Facebook financial interests andhis reliance on Facebook'sCooley Godward LLP attorneysfor his appointment.

Click to enlar ge

BARACK OBAMA'S DARK POOLS

OF CORRUPTION

CLICK HERE FOR WASHINGTON'S ETHICAL

DISEASE DISCOVERIES RE. FACEBOOK "DARK

POOLS"

W LL HUMANKIND EVER LEARN? Facebook's Orwelliandoublespeak about property and pr ivacy (theft) merelyrepeats the eventual dehumanization of the individual underMAO's Red Star, Stalin's SOVIET Hammer & Cycle and Hitler 'sNAZI Swastika. Respect for the inalienable r ights of eachindividual is a bedrock value of democracy. The members ofthe Facebook Cabal abuse this pr inciple at every opportunity.They evidently believe that they deserve special pr ivileges andare willing to lie, cheat and steal in order to treat themselvesto these pr ivileges.

STOP FACEBOOK PROPERTY

THEFT

ASK CONGRESS: PASS THE

INVENTOR PROTECTION ACT!

7/12/2014 Americans For Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/01/leader-v-facebook-wall-of-shame.html 4/26

enough to think no one can touch you. How is that different from Paul Minor loaning judgesmoney to pay their debts? Did these Leader v. Facebook judges seriously think we would notnotice?

If one is tempted to doubt how widespread judicial corruption is, read this from the U.S.Department of Justice’s website:

"Bribery is endemic to our courts, because those persons vested with authorityto prosecute judicial bribery are indifferent. They fail to do their job."OpenDOJ

WALL OF SHAME

In addition to public outrage and shaming (which is growing in popularity given the lack ofself-policing in the legal community), the Senate and House Judiciary Committees, as well asother committees, like the House Committee on Government Reform, are the primarylegislative checks and balances.

David Luban writes “Equality before the law, like universal suffrage, holds a privileged placein our political system, and to deny equality before the law delegitimizes that system. . . .when these rights are denied, the expectation that the affronted parties should continue torespect the political system . . . that they should continue to treat it as a legitimate politicalsystem--has no basis.” Lawyers and Justice: An Ethical Study, 251, 264-66 n.12 (PrincetonUniv. Press, 1988).

LEADER V. FACEBOOK—THE MOST EGREGIOUS EXAMPLE OF JUDICIAL

CORRUPTION EVER? A VERITABLE FACEBOOK LOVE-FEST.

We have before us in Leader v. Facebook perhaps the most egregious example of judicialcorruption in the history of American jurisprudence.

We have a federal district courtjudge Leonard P. Starkpermitting Facebook to addsignificant new claims (too late;at least by the Rules) whiledenying Leader time to preparetheir defenses to those newclaims. We have this same JudgeStark who ignored two of his ownkey jury instructions, and ignoredthe jury’s own words to him thatthey made their on-sale bardecision against Leader withoutevidence.

This same judge effectivelypracticed bait-and-switch by firstinstructing Leader's attorneys toanswer Interrogatory No. 9 only inthe 2009 present tense, but then allowed the jury to interpret it in the past tense anyway. Inshort, he handed Facebook attorneys the exact confusing answer they needed to confuse thejury. Did we mention that he permitted Facebook to show the jury a heavily doctoredInterrogatory No. 9 (60% was blanked out) at trial and denied Leader's request to show theun-doctored version?

We have a Federal Circuit panel of three judges (Alan D. Lourie, Kimberly A. Moore, EvanJ. Wallach, along with Randall R. Rader and Clerk Jan Horbaly) who did not disqualifythemselves since some of them held stock in Facebook while Facebook went public in thelargest tech IPO in US history—during the Leader v. Facebook appeal. We have this samepanel ignoring the English definition of "is" and legal applications of verb tense, and utterlyignoring their own tests of the evidence.

Did we mention that the Federal Circuit's own opinion debunked all of Facebook's evidenceby the time it was all said and done. Even they could not uphold Facebook's fabricated"evidence."

Not to be deterred from the Facebook love-fest, did we mention that the Federal Circuitpanel then fabricated whole new arguments for Facebook in secret after Facebook’sarguments fell apart?

THE FEDERAL COURTS:

HACKER WAY OR BUST

Click image above to download a poster-quality PDF optimizedfor a 11in. x 17in. (ledger-size) poster. America should not bein the business of cheating its entrepreneurial investors simplybecause the cheaters buy off judges with the money gainedfrom their theft. Such permissiveness is obscene.

Jul. 23, 2013 NOTICE: DonnaKlineNow! hasgone offline. All her posts are available as aPDF collection here (now updated, post-Scribd censorship).

Mar. 20, 2014 READER NOTICE: On Mar. 7,2014, all of our documents linked to Scribdwere deleted by that "cloud" service usingthe flimsiest of arguments . Some of ourdocuments have been there for two yearsand some had a most 20,000 reads.

George Orwell wrote in 1984 that one knowsone is in a totalitarian state when telling thetruth becomes an act of courage.

All the links below were updated Mar. 20,2014 (many thanks to our volunteers!)

1. Summary of Motions, Appeal,Petition, Evidence, Analysis, Briefings(FULL CITATIONS) in LeaderTechnologies, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc.,08-cv-862-JJF-LPS (D. Del. 2008),published as Leader Techs, Inc. v.Facebook, Inc., 770 F. Supp. 2d 686 (D.Del. 2001)

2. Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam's CensoredFederal Circuit Filings (Archive)

3. Brief Summary of Leader v. Facebook

4. Backgrounder

5. Fenwick & West LLP Duplicity

6. Instagram-scam

7. USPTO-reexam Sham

8. Zynga-gate

LEADER V. FACEBOOK

BACKGROUND

7/12/2014 Americans For Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/01/leader-v-facebook-wall-of-shame.html 5/26

Did we mention that the panel did not give Leader a chance to challenge these newarguments?

Did we mention that the clerk's staffer Valerie White said the judges could not have seen,much less considered the arguments in a friend of the court motion supporting Leaderbefore it was denied by her boss, Clerk of Court Horbaly? Did we mention this same clerk istight with Facebook's chief appeals lawyer Thomas G. Hungar of Gibson Dunn LLP who alsorepresents one of Facebook's largest shareholders, Microsoft?

Did we mention that the courts ignored damning new evidence that Mark Zuckerberg hadwithheld 28 hard drives from Leader before the trial? New testimony in another caseindicates that these hard drives might prove that Zuckerberg had Leader's actual sourcecode—that's potentially criminal and would have raised the stakes in the trial dramatically.

Did we mention that The Federal Circuit Bar Association and the Clerk of Courts collaboratedto file a motion absolving the judges of their conflicts of interest, only to withdraw itsecretly once their scheme was exposed? This motion was chock full of easily provable falseand misleading statements.

Follow the links on the right sidebar of this article to study the facts for yourself.

Several grassroots movements are developing to press this case untiljustice is served. They are drafting a set of criteria for what qualities ajudge to be on the Wall of Shame:

1. Their corruption is based on publicly available facts.

2. They have ignored well-settled law.

3. They have a conflict of interest that breaches the Code of Conduct for federal judges.

4. They have ignored material new evidence.

5. They have made false statements.

6. They have violated Fifth and 14th Amendment due process

THE JUDICIAL CORRUPTION WALL OF SHAME

The following Leader v. Facebook judges qualify for the Judicial Corruption Wall of Shame.What would motivate such a diverse group of judges with "for life" appointments frommarching lockstep off the ethical cliff, unless bribed or coerced by promises of big money . .. on the side of course . . . wink, wink?

Judicial Corruption Wall of Shame

Alan D. LourieKimberly A.

MooreEv an J. Wallach Randall R. Rader Jan Horbaly Leonard P. Stark

Shame Checklist Subject: Judicial Conduct in Leader v. Facebook*

1.

Ignored well-accepted precedent tests Breach: Group One v. Hallmark Cards, Pfaff v. Wells Elecs., Inc.

2.

Failed to disclose Facebook stock holdings Breach: Code of Conduct for United States Judges

3.

Ignored evidence that Zuckerberg concealed 28 hard drives Breach: Rules of Civil Procedure

4.

Made multiple knowingly false statements in judicial orders Breach: Rules of Profession Conduct

5.

Fabricated new appeals arguments for Facebook in secretBreach: 5th & 14th Amendment

Failed to let Leader challenge the new arguments Breach: 5th & 14th Amendment

9. James W. Breyer / Accel PartnersLLP Insider Trading

10. Federal Circuit DisciplinaryComplaints

11. Federal Circuit Cover-up

12. Congressional Briefings re. Leader v.Facebook judicial corruption

13. Prominent Americans Speak Out

14. Petition for Writ of Certiorari

15. Two Proposed Judicial Reforms

16. S. Crt. for Schemers or Inventors?

17. Attorney Patronage Hijacked DC?

18. Justice Denied | Battle Continues

19. FB Robber Barons Affirmed by S. Crt.

20. Judicial M isconduct WALL OF SHAME

21. Corruption Watch - "Oh what webswe weave, when first we practice todeceive"

22. Facebook | A Portrait of Corruption

23. White House Meddling

24. Georgia! AM 1080 McKibben Interview

25. Constitutional Crisis Exposed

26. Abuse of Judicial Immunity sinceStump

27. Obamacare Scandal Principals areintertwined in the Leader v.Facebook scandal

28. S.E.C. duplicity re. Facebook

Investigative Reporter JuliaDavis investigatesFacebook's Leader v.Facebook attorney GibsonDunn LLP. She credits this

firm with the reason why not a single WallStreet banker has gone to jail since 2008.Click here to read her article "Everybodyhates whistleblowers." Examiner.com, Apr.10, 2012. Here's an excerpt:

"Skillful manipulation of thefirm’s extensive mediaconnections allows GibsonDunn to promote theircauses, while simultaneouslysmearing their opponents andsilencing embarrassing newscoverage."

This statement followed right after Daviscited Facebook's chief inside counsel in theLeader v. Facebook case, Theodore Ullyot,who appears to have helped lead the Leaderv. Facebook judicial corruption. Interestingword choices associated with Gibson DunnLLP: manipulation, smear. Attorneys swear asolemn oath to act morally, ethically, and in

GIBSON DUNN LLP exposed as

one of the most corrupt law

firms in America

7/12/2014 Americans For Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/01/leader-v-facebook-wall-of-shame.html 6/26

Posted by K. Craine at 1:37 PM

6.

7.

Censored docket and avoided public exposure of misconduct Breach: Rules of Civil Procedure

8.

Ignored English language use of verb tense Breach: The Dictionary Act, Carr v. US

9.

Ignored own court orders re. interrogatories & jury instructionsBreach: Rules of Civil Procedure

*Ref: Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Leader Technologies, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc.,No. 12-617 (U.S. Nov. 16, 2012).

Should Facebook users voluntarily pay user license fees to Leader in a citizens' movement todo the right thing since the courts have forsaken our laws and respect for property rights?

Interesting solution.

OPEN QUESTION TO FACEBOOK USERS:

VOLUNTARILY PAY LEADER A LICENSE FEE

FOR YOUR USE OF THEIR TECHNOLOGY THAT

FACEBOOK HAS STOLEN?

What do you say Facebook users? If someone gave youthe keys to a car to use freely, then told you six

months later that the car was stolen, would you keep using the car? At the very least,wouldn't you want to pay the car owner for the privilege of continued use of his car?

* * *

+3 Recommend this on Google

27 comments:

K. Craine January 30, 2013 at 8:28 AM

Comment by: Facebook user feeling guilty

Tell me where to send my license fee to Leader. If these "boy king" bastards at Facebookaren't going to do the right thing, then us users will just have to do it for them.

Reply

K. Craine January 30, 2013 at 12:45 PM

Comment by: Henry

Sounds like these judges were on crack. I have a close relative who is an addict. He is apathological liar. Sounds like these judges don't know how to be truthful, they onlypretend to be honest.

Reply

K. Craine January 30, 2013 at 3:42 PM

Comment by: Platypus

support of democratic principles. Theypromise to conduct themselves in a mannerthan instills confidence among the citizenryin the rule of law and the judicial system.These promises appear to be meaningless.Click here for a PDF version of Julie Davis'article.

BOYCOTT NCAA MARCHMADNESS? COPYRIGHT-GATEConstitutional rightsadvocates demand thatNCAA stop its copyrightinfringement in social

media; ask Congress to preserveZuckerberg's ...

LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALLOF SHAMEJudges go to jail for farless serious misconduct;Facebook users should payLeader fees voluntarily; its

the right thing to do since Faceb...

LEADER V. FACEBOOK JUDICIALMISCONDUCT EXPOSES A CONSTITUTIONALCRISISLeader v. Facebook judicial misconductexposes a constitutional crisis The theftof Leader Technologies’ patent byFacebook, and the effe...

THE REAL FACEBOOK - APORTRAIT OF CORRUPTIONFig. 1—Mary L. Schapiro ,Chairman, Securities &Exchange Commission.Schapiro was in charge

while her underling chief counsel,Thoma...

WHITE HOUSE SCANDALSPREADS TO LEADER V.FACEBOOKSEC counsel cleared theway for the Facebook“pump and dump” scheme

in 2008? SEC counsel appears to havefailed to disclose his conflic...

MASSIVE WASHINGTONCORRUPTION EXPOSED BYLEADER V. FACEBOOKBi-partisan citizen groupappeals to Congress toRESTORE PROPERTY

CONFISCATED BY widespread federalcorruption incl. interference by Nancy ...

WAS CHIEF JUSTICEROBERTS BLACKMAILEDINTO SUPPORTINGOBAMACARE BY HIS LEADERV. FACEBOOK MISCONDUCT?Enlarge banner image New,

Jun. 28, 2013: Undermined Checks &Balances Federal Circuit Clerk wasprotecting the judges and...

A COCKSURE FACEBOOKFacebook waived theirright to respond to LeaderTechnologies’ U.S.Supreme Court petition AFIInsights | Contributing

Writers | AMERI...

PATENT OFFICE REMOVES CRITICAL LEADERV. FACEBOOK DISCLOSURE ITEMSUSPTO conduct parallels the document

POPULAR POSTS

7/12/2014 Americans For Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/01/leader-v-facebook-wall-of-shame.html 7/26

I like this shame idea. I saw a CNN interview with some comedian who says he thinks thatshame may be the new way to "encourage" people to do the right thing. People who justkeep doing the wrong things and have no moral compass. To bad we have to use thistactic with judges. They are supposed to be smart and above this. These judges jumpedin the Facebook minivan on the way to Woodstock. I need to go shower. Yuck.

Reply

K. Craine January 30, 2013 at 8:56 PM

Comment by: Judicial Corruption

Attorneys pretend to tell the truth, and judges pretend to police them. Then they suefor libel to maintain the charade if exposed. This system of endemic corruption must befixed. It is totally, completely and utterly out of hand.

Reply

K. Craine January 30, 2013 at 9:25 PM

Comment by: Law Blogger

These libel lawsuits by judges should be allowed to run their course. It's a two-edgedsword for a crooked judge. He or she may be counting on an early settlement tomaintain his or her ruse. However, if the allegations are true, then discovery shouldunearth the truth. I would love to see the phone records and meeting logs of thesejudges' contacts with Facebook attorneys, not to mention their bank accounts andHomeland Security's reports on their foreign holdings and those of their family members.We can already see that Judges Moore and Lourie (and probably others, not to mentiontheir families) had Facebook stock during the Leader case. That alone is enough toimpeach IMHO, especially since they were asked to disclose their holdings and otherconflicts. It is inconceivable that no one in the Federal Circuit, or their families, did notinvest in the Facebook IPO. Proving just one who invested will invalidated the En Bancdenial and the entire Federal Circuit opinion in this case.

Reply

K. Craine January 31, 2013 at 6:49 AM

Comment by: AFJ Reader

According to ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE information about Judge Evan J. Wallach:

"From 1987-1988 he worked as General Counsel and Public Policy Advisor to Senator HarryReid."[1]

Harry Reid seems to have no problems with duplicity and lining one's family's pockets, aswas reported by AFI in a "Postscript AFI Editorial."[2]

Harry Reid's son-in-law Steven G Barringer lobbied for a Henderson, Nev. developmentthat Reid grandfathered into the 2009 Omnibus Act. Harry Reid's son Josh is now the cityattorney for Henderson.

Did Judge Wallach learn his craft all too well from the Senate Majority leader? Is thatwhy he is so sure the Senate Judiciary Committee won't investigate him?

[1] http://www.afj.org/judicial-selection/nominees/evan-j-wallach.html?templateName=template-30435193

[2] http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/p/dc-bar-refuses-to-investigate-attorney.html

Reply

K. Craine February 1, 2013 at 7:31 AM

Comment by: Peanuts

It just struck me while the Federal Circuit is sick. It was the creation in 1982 by, of andfor attorneys. It's purpose seemed like a good idea at the time, namely to populate itwith judges who know patents. However, what it lacked was any semblance ofaccountability other than to itself. That was a prescription for corruption. The foundersimplemented a system of checks and balances. The attorneys who framed the FederalCircuit's charter built a self-serving entity that is now rife with corruption, lack ofaccountability and no checks and balances??? Worse, many of the new appointees don'teven know patents, like Judge Evan J. Wallach on the Leader v. Facebook panel.

obstruction by the IRS Fig.2 – On Jun. 15, 2013Congressman Darrell Issaheld up a blacked-out I...

WALL STREETMANIPULATION OF JUDGES,POLITICIANS ANDREGULATORS EXPOSED BYLEADER V. FACEBOOKJUDICIAL CORRUPTION

"Dark pools" used for currency, bribes,coercion and undue influence RiggedLeader v. Facebook , likely crashedNASDAQ Co...

1. DC Bar refuses to investigateattorney misconduct in Leader v.Facebook - Unwillingness of DCattorneys to self-police may explainwhy Washington is broken, Dec. 30,2012

2. Will the U.S. Supreme court supportschemers or real American inventors?Facebook's case dangles on adoctored interrogatory. Eighteen (18)areas of question shout forattention, Dec. 27, 2012

3. Two Policy Changes That Will MakeAmerica More Democratic (and lesscontentious), Dec. 21, 2012

EDITORIALS

American citizens must fight abuse of theconstitutional right for authors andinventors to enjoy the fruits of theirinventions, as a matter of matter of basicproperty rights and sound public policy.Otherwise, instead of innovation, creativity,genius, ideas, vision, courage,entrepreneurship, respect, property,rejuvenation, morals, ethics, values,renewal, truth, facts, rights, privacy,solutions and judicial faithfu ness,

. . . our society and economy will be draggeddown (and eventually destroyed) by copying,infringement, thievery, counterfeiting,hacking, greed, misinformation,exploitation, abuse, waste, disrespect,falsity, corruption, bribery, coercion,intimidation, doublespeak, misconduct, lies,deception, attorney "dark arts," destruction,confusion, dishonesty, judicial chicanery andlawlessness.

If we do not speak up, impeach derelictjudges and imprison corrupt attorneys, wecannot possibly hope to start fixing thecurrent ills in our society. Without justiceand respect for private property,democracy has no sure foundation.

OUR MISSION

CURRENT EDITORIAL FOCUS

7/12/2014 Americans For Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/01/leader-v-facebook-wall-of-shame.html 8/26

Reply

K. Craine February 1, 2013 at 8:06 AM

Comments by: Lucy

Right on Peanuts! When you consider that the Federal Circuit handles ALL U.S. PatentOffice appeals, you see a corrupt and scandalously unaccountable TRIFECTA among: (1)corrupt attorneys, (2) corrupt patent office directors and examiners, and (3) a corruptpatent appeals court. Its a formula for friggin disaster. We are seeing that disaster inliving color in the Leader v. Facebook scandal. Speaking of corrupt trifectas, what's thestatus of Facebook's USPTO-Director-ordered 3rd reexam BTW?

Anybody know how Fenwick & West's Christopher P. King aka Christopher-Charles King isholding up in their shell game at the patent office having not disclosed Leader's patentsas prior art in the Facebook patent family? LOL

Reply

K. Craine February 1, 2013 at 8:20 AM

Comment by: Well Duhhhh

You guys should be running Congress. You're doing a better job at figuring out what'swrong than they have been able to!!!!! You must actually solve problems and produceresults for a living!

Reply

K. Craine February 1, 2013 at 1:48 PM

Comment by: Must look stupid

The Federal Circuit BARFED AND LAUGHED ALL OVER these guidelines on judicialdisqualification from the FEDERAL JUDICIAL CENTER:

"even the smallest financial interest (e.g., ownership of a single share of stock) requires disqualification. Under § 455(c), it is a judge’s duty tokeep abreast of all of his or her financial interests."

http://www.fjc.gov/public/pdf.nsf/lookup/judicialdq.pdf/$file/judicialdq.pdf

Do ya think Judges Moore and Lourie had at least a "single" share in Facebook betweentheir five or ten funds. Do you think it is possible that NONE of the Federal Circuitjudges purchased stock in Facebook during the IPO? Did ANY of them disclose anddisqualify? Nope. This is outrageous conduct from people we are supposed to trust.

Reply

K. Craine February 2, 2013 at 6:34 AM

Comment by: Law Blogger

Judge Evan J. Wallach speaks with forked tongue. He denied Leader Technologies theirrights and their property, and abused the Code of Conduct for United States Judges inLeader v. Facebook. HOWEVER, in 2005 he self-righteously called for accountability whenhe criticized the U.S. military and Bush Administration regarding the mistreatment ofprisoners in Abu Graib. He wrote:

“Our values are non-negotiable for members of our profession. They are what aprofessional military force represents to the world. Those who do battle with monstersmust take care that they do not thereby become a monster. Always remember thatwhen you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes back into you . . . The abyss is gazing backat us.” Pages 537, 538, 621.

“In the civilian context, where government officials operate under the color of law haveentered into an agreement to violate federal law, all persons who joined in thatagreement are liable for all reasonably foreseeable violations of law which were done inits furtherance.” Pages 618-619.

OK Judge Wallach, your LEADER V. FACEBOOK MONSTERS are staring at you. Are yougoing to do the right thing, or are you just another moral hypocrite who likes to hearhimself pontificate?

I suspect the later. Prove me wrong.

We are an opinion blog that advocates forstrong intellectual property rights. Wewelcome commenters and contributors. TheLeader v. Facebook patent infringement casefirst came to our attention after learningthat the trial judge, Leonard P. Stark, U.S.District Court of Delaware, ignored his jury’sadmission that they had no evidence tosupport their on-sale bar verdict, but thejudge supported it anyway.

The judicial misconduct has deterioratedfrom there, replete with two of the threejudges on the Federal Circuit appeal panel,Judges Alan D. Lourie and Kimberly A.Moore, holding Facebook stock that theydid not disclose to the litigants, and latertried to excuse through a quick motionslipped in at the last minute by the Clerk ofCourt, Jan Horbaly, and his close friends atThe Federal Circuit Bar Association. (The DCBar subsequently revealed that Mr. Horbalyis not licensed to practice law inWashington D.C.)

The judges ignored shocking new evidencethat Mark Zuckerberg withheld 28 harddrives of 2003-2004 evidence from LeaderTechnologies that could prove actual theft(and therefore claims even more seriousthan infringement). In addition, Facebook'sappeal attorney, Thomas G. Hungar ofGibson Dunn LLP, has close personal ties tojust about every judicial player in this story.The misconduct appears to reach into theU.S. Patent Office through abuse of thereexamination process by Facebook. We willstay focused on Leader v. Facebook untiljustice is served, but we also welcome newsand analysis of intellectual property abuse inother cases as well.

AFI has been supportingDonna and is now picking upthe main Leader v. Facebookcoverage (she will continuecoverage as well).

Anonymous Posts AreWelcomed! Blogger has more

posting constraints than Donna's WordPress,but we will continue to welcome anonymousposts. Simply send us an email atamer4innov@gmail.com with your post.Once the moderator verifies that your emailaddress is real, your comment will be postedusing your real name or handle, whateveryou wish, like John Smith or Tex.

Click here to view acomplete Donna KlineNow! posts archive.

WELCOME TO DONNA KLINE

NOW! READERS!

7/12/2014 Americans For Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/01/leader-v-facebook-wall-of-shame.html 9/26

CITATION:

http://www.pegc.us/archive/Journals/Wallach_CWR_nexus.pdf

Wallach, E. J. “The Logical Nexus Between the Decision to Deny Application of the ThirdGeneva Convention to the Taliban and al Qaeda and the Mistreatment of Prisoners in AbuGhraib.” CASE WESTERN RESERVE JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2004, VOL 36; NUMB2/3, pages 541-638.

Reply

steve n amy February 5, 2013 at 9:35 AM

So, we were on Facebook this Saturday past (2/2/13), following Lawless America (greatblog, by the way). During a conversation with other followers of the blog I posted a briefsynopsis of Leader Technologies’ fight. I left for a bit and came back to check on anyresponses, and my comment was gone. I inquired as to its disappearance, but they hadneither knowledge nor control over any editing.

“SO, WHY DID IT DISAPPEAR?!!”

They had an open phone line, that night, for callers to call in and give their stories ofany legal problems or corruption that they had either encountered, or to complainabout lawyers, judges, and the like. Anyhow, I started to repost my thoughts about ourcase. I wanted to tell them about Facebook and how they corrupted the judicialprocess (apparently Facebook doesn't like truths being spread about them and their trueorigins). I was promptly greeted with a spam warning, threatening to block me or shut myFacebook account down if I didn’t acknowledge or agree to stop. Fearing a snoopingTrojan, I quickly logged out without acknowledging anything.

As I am sure many on this site are aware, Facebook is obviously trolling their users’ pagesand other sites for info or key words. These are nefarious, dirty people and are alwayslooking over their shoulders!

Stay the course everyone!

Reply

K. Craine February 5, 2013 at 11:13 AM

Comment by: Platypus

This reminds me of the censors in China? How is it different?

Reply

K. Craine February 7, 2013 at 5:47 AM

Comment by: Bryn T

Me too! I was talking with Lawless America on Facebook too, then all of a sudden ascreen popped up that I have NEVER seen before and I have been using it since highschool telling me it was going to kick me off if I did not stop SPAMMING! I have neverspammed in my life. THIS SOUNDS LIKE BIG BROTHER. My parents tell me this is the kindof censorship you see in a dictatorship. Very creepy. Who are these people runningFacebook, a bunch of friggin NAZIS???

Reply

K. Craine February 7, 2013 at 7:24 AM

Comment by: Conflicts Checker

THEODORE W. ULLYOT, Facebook's General Legal Counsel, who oversaw the Leader v.Facebook judicial scandal, sorry, patent infringement case, appears to be dumping hisstock:

Here's the SEC Insider Trading Report for Theodore Warren Ullyot:

http://www.secform4.com/insider-trading/1382582.htm

Let's see, if this judicial misconduct was motivated by Facebook's law firms, directed byMr. Ullyot, do you think the fingers might point to him? However, we all know he is onlya puppet for the board of directors led by James W. Breyer, Yuri M ilner (DST Moscow)and Sheryl Sandberg... the last two being bailout director Larry Summers' understudies.Hmmmmmmmm.

"CANON 2: A JUDGE SHOULD AVOIDIMPROPRIETY AND THE APPEARANCE OFIMPROPRIETY IN ALL ACTIVITIES"

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR U.S.

JUDGES

Judge Leonard P. Stark, U.S.District Court of Delaware, trialjudge in Leader Techs, Inc. v.Facebook, Inc., 770 F. Supp. 2d 686(D.Del. 2011). Judge Stark heardhis jury foreman admit that thejury made the on-sale bar decisionwithout any evidence other thanspeculation, and yet he supportedthat verdict anyway. Just monthsbefore trial, Judge Stark allowedFacebook to add the on-sale barclaim after the close of all fact

GALLERY OF JUDICIAL

MISCONDUCT

7/12/2014 Americans For Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/01/leader-v-facebook-wall-of-shame.html 10/26

Reply

K. Craine February 7, 2013 at 4:04 PM

COVER-UP AT THE US PATENT OFFICE: AFI has just received a copy of a recent Freedomof Information response just issued by the Patent Office in the growing judicialcorruption scandal. As you can see for yourself, the USPTO literally covered up alldisclosure of information regarding their order of a 3rd reexamination of LeaderTechnologies' U.S. Patent No. 7,139,761.

As a refresher, Facebook lost these arguments at trial. Then, they have lost them again,twice, during two earlier re-examinations. Not even the Patent Examiner Deandra M.Hughes approves of this 3rd reexam order.

The scent of foul play is strong. This document can be obtained in two places:

GOOGLE-DRIVE:https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B2SfG2nEsMfqSkJNR1RycUtWZ k/edit?usp=sharing

SCRIBD:http://www.scribd.com/doc/124428891/Patent-Office-Cover-up-in-Leader-v-Facebook-Feb-7-2013

We'll write a post about this after we've had time to consider the implications. Clearly,the scandal hole gets deeper. As we have suspected all along it would. One cannot bethis bad, for this long, without eventually getting caught.

Reply

K. Craine February 8, 2013 at 6:02 AM

Comment by: Judicial Corruption

This kind of cover-up is precisely what occurs when a government agency believes itselfto be no longer accountable to the citizens who fund their very existence.Congratulations to whoever dug this up. Now we're getting somewhere. Everyone on thisblog should use this material and request their own Congressional Inquiries from theirCongresspersons and Freedom of Information Act requests. Suggest you ask to see allcommunications among every person identified on those USPTO messages and anyone onthe list of Facebook cronies.

Each of you should ask them each to disclose whether they hold Facebook stock eitherdirectly or through an investment vehicle like a mutual fund, IRA, Keogh, etc. Be sure topersonalize your request with unique requests so that the USPTO cannot send a formletter response, like they did the last time.

Make noise folks. It works. Bad guys don't like the light of day.

Reply

K. Craine February 8, 2013 at 6:19 AM

Comment by: Judicial Corruption

Just so everyone is clear, USPTO matters are overseen by federal judges too, they'recalled "Administrative Patent Judges."

In the Leader v. Facebook 3rd examination, they are:

Judge Allen R. MacDonaldJudge Stephen C. SiuJudge Meredith C. Petravick

These judges are also bound by the Code of Conduct for United States Judges.

They should be asked to disclose whether they hold stock in Facebook, or whether anyof their family members own stock. If they do, even a small amount, they are bound bythe Code of Conduct to disqualify themselves.

Reply

K. Craine February 8, 2013 at 6:30 AM

UPDATE ON USPTO COVER-UP IN LEADER V. FACEBOOK:

discovery andblocked Leaderfrom preparing itsdefenses to thisnew claim. JudgeStark allowed theclaims despite Leader's propheticargument that the action wouldconfuse the jury and prejudiceLeader. (Read Leader's May 20,2010 motion here.) He alsopermitted the jury to ignore thePfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc. testfor on-sale bar, even afterinstructing the jury to use it. (Seethat JuryInstruction No. 4.7here.) He alsocontradicted hisown instruction toLeader to answerInterrogatory No. 9 in the presenttense (2009), then permitted thejury to interpret it as a 2002admission as well. See his Sep. 14,2009 Order. Facebook's entire on-sale bar case is based upon thisinterrogatory. (Editorial: Hardlysufficient to meet the "heavyburden" of the clear andconvincing evidence standard.)

Judge Alan D. Lourie, U.S. Courtof Appeals for the Federal Circuit,panel judge in Leader Techs v.Facebook, Inc., 678 F.3d 1300 (Fed.Cir. 2012). Judge Lourie stood tobenefit financially fromundisclosed holdings in Facebook.See analysis of Judge Lourie's T.Rowe Price holdings re. theFacebook IPO.Judge Lourie alsofailed to apply hisown law-test inGroup One v.Hallmark Cards tothe evidence. After debunking allof Facebook's evidence on appeal,Judge Lourie created newargument in the secrecy ofchambers to support Facebookand prevent the on-sale barverdict from being overturned—aclear breach of constitutional dueprocess.

Judge Kimberly A. Moore, U.S.

7/12/2014 Americans For Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/01/leader-v-facebook-wall-of-shame.html 11/26

We updated the USPTO Cover-up Documents with an update that includes a new requestfor a new inquiry as a result of the covered-up contents. The Scribd link is automaticallyupdated, here is the updated Google link:

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B2SfG2nEsMfqUFVNZDJxQkpyZHM/edit?usp=sharing

Reply

K. Craine February 8, 2013 at 3:19 PM

Comment by: Sleuth Dog

We need people who know these individuals and their families to tell us which peoplehave experienced "SUDDEN UNEXPLAINED WEALTH" or "SUDDEN UNEXPLAINEDOPPORTUNITY."

Such symptoms ALWAYS tag along, side by side, with corruption.

Reply

K. Craine February 9, 2013 at 7:03 AM

Comment by: Light Reader

I was just reading the COMMUNIST MANIFESTO today written by Karl Marx and FriedrichEnglels in 1848. Ran across these Communist objectives:

1. Abolition of property2. Heavy progressive graduated income tax...4. Centralization of credit... by means of a national bank5. Centralization of the means of communication...6. Free education for all children

Wow, do these planks sound contemporary? Read for yourself a summary in Wikipedia at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Communist_Manifesto

Reply

K. Craine February 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM

Comment by: Well Duhhhh

Leader v. Facebook is exposing:

1. Abolition of property - denying property rights to the holder of a valid U.S. Patent -rights guaranteed in Article I Section 8 of the US Constitution.

4. Centralization of credit - Facebook Credits (oh wait, they claim the aren't doing thisanymore, yeh right).

5. Centralization of communications - Facebook and their scandal-ridden theft of LeaderTechnologies inventions; ripping off user privacy and shipping it to China, Russia andIndia.

... three out of your six Light Reader.

The other three are being pushed actively by the current administration, it appears tome. Of course, there is nothing inherently wrong with free education, but as the SovietUnion learned, it works for a while as a means of political indoctrination, until it fallsapart from within due to its moral bankruptcy.

Looks like those die-hard communists are back in the saddle, now in business suits, alliedwith the Thieving Gangs in Silicon Valley - who sold their immortal souls to the highestborscht-breath bidders.

Reply

K. Craine February 9, 2013 at 7:35 AM

Comment by: snoop dog

All roads lead back to Lawrence Summers, Sheryl Sandberg and Yuri M ilner when

Court of Appeals for the FederalCircuit, panel judge in LeaderTechs v. Facebook, Inc., 678 F.3d1300 (Fed. Cir. 2012). Judge Moorestood to benefit financially fromundisclosed holdings in Facebook.See disclosure of substantialholdings in Facebook andFacebook-related stocks. JudgeMoore failed tofollow the long-held precedentfor testing on-salebar evidence inPfaff v. WellsElectronics, Inc.—an evident andintentional omission coming from aformer patent law professor. Afterdebunking all of Facebook'sevidence on appeal, Judge Moorecreated new argument in thesecrecy of chambers to supportFacebook and prevent the on-salebar verdict from being overturned—a clear breach of constitutionaldue process.

Judge Evan J. Wallach, U.S. Courtof Appeals for the Federal Circuit,member of the three-judge panelin Leader Techs v. Facebook, Inc.,678 F.3d 1300 (Fed. Cir. 2012).Judge Wallach is not a patentattorney. This begs the questionas to why a judge with noknowledge of patent law wasassigned to the case. Wouldanyone ask a dentist to performbrain surgery? The Federal Circuitwas specially formed to appointpatent-knowledgeable judges topatent cases. There is noevidence so far in the judicialdisclosures that Judge Wallachholds stock in Facebook, althoughwhen he was asked on a motion todisclose potential Facebookholdings and other conflicts ofinterest, he refused along withthe other judges. See Motion toDisclose Conflicts of Interest.Judge Wallachcontinued insilence even afterClerk of CourtHorbaly failed toprovide him withDr. Lakshmi Arunachalam’s motions(according to his Federal Circuitstaffer Valeri White), and yet theClerk signed an order regardingthat motion on Judge Wallach’sbehalf. See a full analysis of theseevents at Donna Kline Now! JudgeWallach also failed to police hiscourt’s violation of Leader’s Fifthand 14th Amendmentconstitutional right to dueprocess when he participated in

7/12/2014 Americans For Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/01/leader-v-facebook-wall-of-shame.html 12/26

Summers was Chief Economist for the World Bank in the early 1990's.

Curiously,

Summers was President of Harvard when Zuckerberg got his start in 2003-2004. Explainshow the 19-yr. old received more press coverage than all other world figures exceptClinton and Bush in THE HARVARD CRIMSON. They're layin' down the spin, dude.

Summers proposed the failed economic transition policy in the USSR that gave birth tothe current oligarch robber barons in Russia.

Summers is teamed with one of the Russian oligarchs through his protege Yuri M i ner,second largest investor in Facebook.

Summers is teamed with Facebook through his protege Sheryl Sandberg, Chief OperatingOfficer at Facebook and Zuckerberg's puppetmaster.

Summers friends at Goldman Sachs put an executive in London before the 2008 bailoutwith a big basket to catch theirs and Morgan Stanley's $32 billion windfall from thebailout. That executive now works for Yuri M ilner in Dubai.

Summers arranged to have himself appointed as "special adviser" to Marc Andreessen justweeks before the scandalous $1 billion purchase of Instagram by Facebook right beforethe IPO. Milner's and Sandberg's payoff? Their "thank you" for the years of tutelage inhow to organize global corruption?

Milner was associated in the early 2000's with Bank Menatep that was caught launderingover $10 billion in mob money and diverting over $4 billion in IMF funds (probably WorldBank funds too, according to some reports).

The list of koinky-dinks is much longer, these are only highlights

Reply

K. Craine February 11, 2013 at 7:57 AM

Dear AFI Readers:

AFI has received multiple reports this weekend of Facebook censorship of posts inFacebook private chats and even friend-ing of people who are attempting to publicizeand follow the growing Leader v. Facebook judicial corruption scandal.

Facebook censorship has stopped PRIVATE conversations that were critical of Facebook,in several reports. In another, Facebook blocked friend requests between Facebookusers and their U.S. Congressman, Senators and judicial reform advocacy groups likeLawless America.

It has been suggested that those experiencing First Amendment Free Speech violationsshould report them to federal and state (1) Departments of Commerce, (2) InspectorsGeneral, and (3) your members of Congress.

U.S. Dept. of Commerce:http://www.commerce.gov/

U.S. Inspector General:http://www.justice.gov/oig/Go to your State's Department of Commerce and Inspectors General Websites to get thecontact information in your State.

U.S. Congress:http://www.contactingthecongress.org/

Reply

kissablekaren February 11, 2013 at 10:57 AM

LETS ALL SUE FACEBOOK FOR VIOLATION OF OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMOF SPEECH!

Reply

K. Craine February 14, 2013 at 6:54 AM

Comment by: Kissablechas

Hey Kissablekaren,

the fabrication of new argumentsand evidence for Facebook in thesecrecy of judge's chambers afterhe had just invalidated Facebook’ssole remaining item of evidence(using disbelieved testimony asostensible evidence of anopposite). Judge Wallach alsofailed to police his court when hefailed to apply the SupremeCourt's Pfaff v. Wells Electronics,Inc. test for on-sale bar evidence,which included even the FederalCircuit’s own Group One v.Hallmark Cards, Inc. test—a testwhich Judge Lourie should haveadvised Judge Wallach to followsince Judge Lourie helped writethat opinion. Group One testomission analysis.

Clerk of Court Jan Horbaly, U.S.Court of Appeals for the FederalCircuit, clerk who signed all theopinions in Leader Techs v.Facebook, Inc., 678 F.3d 1300 (Fed.Cir. 2012). Clerk Horbaly and hisstaff obfuscated when the court'sruling was challenged by anamicus curiae brief revealing clearmistakes of law and new evidence.See analysis of the misconductand misrepresentations within theFederal Circuit Clerk of Court inLeader v. Facebook. Mr. Horbalyfailed to disclose his conflicts ofinterest and close associationswith numerous Facebookattorneys and law firms, as well as

his closeassociation withone of Facebook'slargestshareholders,Microsoft, who isa Director of The Federal CircuitBar Association where Mr. Horbalyis an ex officio officer.Additionally, the DC Bar revealedin a written statement that ClerkHorbaly is not licensed to practicelaw in the District of Columbia.[Editorial: What does that makethe Federal Circuit with itslocation within in a stone's throwof the White House? A self-governing state?]

Judge Randall R. Rader, U.S.Court of Appeals for the FederalCircuit, chief judge responsible

7/12/2014 Americans For Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/01/leader-v-facebook-wall-of-shame.html 13/26

Newer Post Older PostHome

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Enter your comment...

Comment as: Google Accoun

Publish

Preview

Facebook has the federal courts on their payroll. The better way is to boycott theiradvertisers and hit them where it hurts: their pocketbooks. Without advertisers givingthem money, their revenue will dry up. 8-O

Reply

K. Craine February 14, 2013 at 1:34 PM

Comment by: Judicial Corruption

FACEBOOK INSIDERS ARE DUMPING STOCK at a feverish pace. Check out the latest Form 4required disclosures at the SEC:

http://www.secform4.com/insider-trading/1326801.htm

What's the hurry boys and girls?

Reply

for the (mis)conduct of his judgesand Clerk of Court in Leader Techsv. Facebook, Inc., 678 F.3d 1300(Fed. Cir. 2012). Judge Rader failedto manage his court resulting in alikely situation where his judgesnever even received briefs thatthey allegedly ruled on in favor ofFacebook. JudgeRader also failedto disclose hisconflictingrelationships witha Leader principlewith whom he may have had deepprofessional differences during histime at the Senate JudiciaryCommittee—his former professorof law at George WashingtonUniversity Law Center, formerLeader director Professor JamesP. Chandler. See analysis of JudgeRader's undisclosed conflicts ofinterest in Leader v. Facebook.Judge Rader alsodid not stop hisjudges fromcreating newarguments andevidence forFacebook in the secrecy ofchambers—after they haddebunked all of Facebook'sevidence on appeal, which is aclear breach of constitutional dueprocess.

Click here to view a FederalCircuit Leader v. FacebookConflicts of Interest Map.

See "Cover-up In Process At TheFederal Circuit?" Donna Kline Now!Sep. 17, 2012.

Leader v. Facebook Legal ResearchLinks

This is an opinion blog. Any informationcontained or linked herein should beindependently verified and should beconsidered the sole opinion of the writer.Free Speech and Freedom of the Press areprotected by the First Amendment of theU.S. Constitution and other local, state,national and international laws. Therefore,as with all opinion, such opinion should notbe relied upon without independentverification.

This site is a not-for-profit effort focused oneducation, news, investigation of issues inthe public interest, and research, and relieson fair use copyright exemptions under 17U.S.C. 106(a)-117 of the United StatesCopyright Act, in addition to any and allother related and relevant privileges towhich a fair and reasonable person wouldattribute to this grassroots effort to rootout corruption and promote justice. Norights whatsoever to third party content areclaimed or implied.

NOTICE: Opinion

7/12/2014 Americans For Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/01/leader-v-facebook-wall-of-shame.html 14/26

AFI LOGO (with text)

AFI LOGO (no text)

Faces of th e FacebookCorru ption (PDF)(cu rren tly bein g u pdatedafter th e Fri. Mar. 7,2014 Scribd cen sorsh ipof th is docu men t:Here is the cast of characters in Leader v.Facebook. We encourage y ou to reporttheir corrupt activ ities to this site andothers, like Lawless America. Feel free tocommunicate anony mously in any wayin which y ou are most comfortable. Theattempt of these people and theirorganizations to corrupt Americanjustice and commerce cannot betolerated. Vigilance. We will exposethem. See Congressional Briefings(currently being updated after Scribdcensored the documents on Fri. Mar. 7 ,201 4).

A. Facebook's law firms:

1 . Fen wi ck & W est LLP (Facebooksecurities and patent law firm;former Leader Technologiescounsel; attempted anappearance in Leader v.Facebook; did not seek conflictswaiv er from Leader prior to

CORRUPTION WATCH LIST

7/12/2014 Americans For Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/01/leader-v-facebook-wall-of-shame.html 15/26

representing Facebook)

2. Cool ey Godwa r d LLP (Facebooklaw firm in Leader v. Facebook;McBee Strategic energy stimuluspartner; Obama Justice Dept.adv isor; former employ er topatent judges)

3 . Bl a n k & R om e LLP (Facebooklaw firm in Leader v. Facebook;former employ er to patentjudges)

4. W h i t e & Ca se LLP (Facebooklaw firm in Leader v. Facebook;undisclosed former employ er toPatent Office Freedom ofInformation Act (FOIA) officerinv olv ed in Leader v. Facebook)

5. Gi bson Du n n LLP (Facebook lawfirm in Leader v. Facebook;undisclosed counsel to the FederalCircuit; undisclosed protégé ofChief Justice John Roberts, Jr.;undisclosed former employ er toPreetinder ("Preet") Bharara, U.S.Attorney currently persecutingPaul Ceglia in U.S. v. Ceglia(Ceglia v. Zuckerberg))

6. Or r i ck Her r i n gt on LLP(longtime Facebook law firm anddestroy er of ev idence for thecabal in Winklevoss v. Zuckerbergand ConnectU v. Facebook)

7 . W ei l Got sh a l LLP (FederalCircuit counsel in Leader v.Facebook; Judge Kimberly A.Moore's undisclosed former client)

8. La t h a m & W a t k i n s LLP(Facebook Director James W.Brey er's counsel; Judge KimberlyA. Moore's husband, Matthew J.Moore's new law firm)

9. Feder a l Ci r cu i t Ba rA ssoci a t i on ("FCBA") (FederalCircuit's bar association; secondlargest in the U.S.; Facebook's lawfirms extert much influence in itspolicy and activ ity , incl. Fenwick& West LLP, Gibson Dunn LLP,Orrick Herrington LLP, WeilGotschal LLP; Facebook's largeshareholder, Microsoft, is adirector; Federal Circuit Clerk ofCourt Jan Horbaly is an officer;FCBA made an appearance inLeader v. Facebook to oppose theamicus curiae (friend of the court)motion of Dr. LakshmiArunachalam, former Director ofNetwork Architecture at SunMicrosy stems, in fav or of LeaderTechnologies and objecting to theev ident conflicts of interestwithin the court itself, hermotion was denied, the judgesrefused to disclose their conflictswhich we now know includeFacebook and Microsoft stocks)

1 0. DC Ba r A ssoci a t i on

1 1 . Per k i n s Coi e LLP (Facebook's"rapid response enforcementteam;" law firm for Obama's chiefcounsels, the husband and wifeteam of Robert F. Bauer andAnita B. Dunn; Bauer wasidentified on Aug. 1 , 201 3 ashav ing directed the IRS targetingof the Tea Party )

1 2. St r oz Fr i edber g (Facebook’s"forensic expert" whomanipulated the data in Paul

7/12/2014 Americans For Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/01/leader-v-facebook-wall-of-shame.html 16/26

Ceglia v. Mark Zuckerberg, andwho first rev ealed the existence of28 Zuckerberg hard driv es andHarv ard emails that they toldLeader Technologies in 2009were "lost")

B . Facebookattorn eys &cooperatin g ju dges:

1 3 . Gor don K . Da v i dson (Fenwick;Facebook's securities and patentattorney ; Leader Technologies'former attorney )

1 4. Ch r i st oph er P. K i n g ( akaChristopher-Charles King akaChristopher King akaChristopher-Charles P. King,Fenwick & West LLP)

1 5. T h eodor e B. Ol son (GibsonDunn)

1 6. T h om a s G. Hu n ga r (GibsonDunn)

1 7 . Er i c H. Hol der , Jr . (AttorneyGeneral, U.S. Dept. of Justice)

1 8. Ja m es Col e (Deputy AttorneyGeneral, U.S. Dept. of Justice)

1 9. T on y W est (Associate AttorneyGeneral, U.S. Dept. of Justice;2008 Obama CaliforniaCampaign Manager)

20. R ober t F. Ba u er (ObamaAttorney ; White House ChiefCounsel; directed IRS targeting ofthe Tea Party ; formerly andcurrently employ ed by PerkinsCoie LLP, Facebook's "rapidresponse enforcement team;"spouse is Anita B. Dunn)

21 . A n i t a B. Du n n (ObamaAttorney ; White House ChiefCounsel; husband Robert F. Bauerdirected IRS targeting of the TeaParty , formerly employ ed byPerkins Coie LLP, Facebook's"rapid response enforcementteam")

22. Ma r y L. Sch a pi r o (formerChairman, Securities & ExchangeCommission (S.E.C.); holdsinv estments in 51 Facebook Clubbasket funds)

23. Ja m es "Ja m i e" Br i ga gl i a n o(former Deputy Director of theDiv ision of Trading and Marketsat the Securities and ExchangeCommission; Mary L. Schapiro'schief lieutenant on "dark pool"rule making)

24. Joseph P. Cu t l er (Perkins Coie)

25. Da v i d P. Ch i a ppet t a (PerkinsCoie)

26. Ja m es R . McCu l l a gh (PerkinsCoie)

27 . R a m sey M. A l -Sa l a m (PerkinsCoie)

28. Gr a n t E. K i n sel (Perkins Coie)

29. R eev e T . Bu l l (Gibson Dunn)

30. Hei di K eefe (Cooley )

31 . Mi ch a el G. R h odes (Cooley ;Tesla Motors)

32. El i z a bet h St a m esh k i n(Cooley )

33. Don a l d K . St er n (Cooley ;

7/12/2014 Americans For Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/01/leader-v-facebook-wall-of-shame.html 17/26

Justice Dept. adv isor)

34. Ma r k R . W ei n st ei n (Cooley )

35. Jeffr ey Nor ber g (Cooley )

36. R on a l d Lem i eu x (Cooley )

37 . Cr a i g W . Cl a r k (Blank Rome)

38. T om A m i s (Cooley / McBeeStrategic)

39. Er i ch V ei t en h ei m er (Cooley /McBee Strategic)

40. R oel Ca m pos (Cooley ; formerCommissioner of the U.S.Securities & ExchangeCommission at the time of theinfamous Facebook 1 2(g)exemption)

41 . Li sa T . Si m pson (Orrick)

42. In dr a Neel Ch a t t er jee (Orrick)

43. Sa m u el O'R ou r k e (Facebook;Cooley -directed)

44. T h eodor e W . Ul l y ot (Facebook;Cooley -directed)

45. A m ber H. R ov er , aka A m ber L.Ha gy aka A m ber Ha t fi el d(Weil Gotshal LLP; JudgeKimberly A. Moore's formerclient)

46. Edwa r d R . R ei n es (WeilGotschal)

47 . T r i sh Ha r r i s (DC BarAssociation)

48. El i z a bet h A . Her m a n (DC BarAssociation)

49. El i z a bet h J. Br a n da (DC BarAssociation)

50. Da v i d J. K a ppos (former PatentOffice Director; former IBM chiefintellectual property counsel;ordered unprecedented 3rdreexam of Leader Technologies'patent; Obama politicalappointee)

51 . Pr eet i n der ("Pr eet ") Bh a r a r a(U.S. Attorney Ceglia v.Zuckerberg; formerly of Gibson &Dunn LLP; protects Zuckerberg)

52. T h om a s J. K i m (SEC ChiefCounsel)

53. A n n e K r a u sk opf (SEC SpecialSr. Counsel)

54. Joh n G. R ober t s, Jr . (ChiefJustice, U.S. Supreme Court)

55. Ja n Hor ba l y (Federal Circuit,Clerk of Court)

56. K i m ber l y A . Moor e (Judge,Federal Circuit)

57 . Ma t t h ew J. Moor e (Latham &Watkins LLP; husband of JudgeKimberly A. Moore)

58. K a t h r y n "K a t h y " R u em m l er(Latham & Watkins LLP; WhiteHouse counsel)

59. Ev a n J. W a l l a ch (Judge,Federal Circuit)

60. A l a n D. Lou r i e (Judge, FederalCircuit)

61 . R a n da l l R . R a der (Chief Judge,Federal Circuit)

62. T er en ce P. St ewa r t (FederalCircuit Bar Association)

63. Leon a r d P. St a r k (Judge,Delaware U.S. District Court)

64. R i ch a r d J. A r ca r a (Judge, N.Y.

7/12/2014 Americans For Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/01/leader-v-facebook-wall-of-shame.html 18/26

Western District, Ceglia v. Holderet al)

65. A l l en R . Ma cDon a l d(Administrativ e Judge, U.S.Patent Office)

66. St eph en C. Si u (Administrativ eJudge, U.S. Patent Office)

67 . Mer edi t h C. Pet r a v i ck(Administrativ e Judge, U.S.Patent Office)

68. Ja m es T . Moor e (AdministratieJudge, U.S. Patent Office)

69. Pi n ch u s M. La u fer (Sr. Counsel,Patent Trial and Appeal Board,PTAB)

7 0. K i m ber l y Jor da n (Counsel,Patent Trial and Appeal Board,PTAB)

7 1 . Da n i el J. R y m a n (Counsel,Patent Trial and Appeal Board,PTAB)

7 2. W i l l i a m J. St offel (Counsel,Patent Trial and Appeal Board,PTAB)

7 3. Ja m es C. Pa y n e (Counsel,Patent Trial and Appeal Board,PTAB)

7 4. Dea n dr a M. Hu gh es(Examiner, Leader v. Facebookreexamination)

7 5. K a t h r y n W a l sh Si eh n del(FOIA Counsel, U.S. Patent Office- bio and conflicts log concealed)

7 6. Den n i s C. Bl a i r (Director, U.S.National Intelligence)

7 7 . Den n i s F. Sa y l or , IV (Judge,Foreign Intelligence Surv eillanceCourt, FISA)

7 8. Ja m es E. Boa sber g (Judge,Foreign Intelligence Surv eillanceCourt, FISA)

7 9. Ja m es P. Ch a n dl er , III(President, National IntellectualProperty Law Institute, NIPLI;The Chandler Law FirmChartered; adv isor to Asst. Att'yGen. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Dept. ofJustice; Member, NationalInfrastructure AssuranceCommission, NIAC; adv isor toFederal Circuit Chief JudgeRandall R. Rader; adv isor to Sen.Orrin Hatch; author, The FederalTrade Secrets Act and theEconomic Espionage Act of 1 996;Leader Technologies' legalcounsel, along with Fenwick &West LLP)

C. Facebook pu ppetmasters:

80. Pr esi den t Ba r a ck Oba m a(appointed Leonard P. Stark tothe judge's seat in DelawareFederal District Court eight day safter Stark's court allowedFacebook to get away with juryand court manipulation of an on-sale bar v erdict which wasattained without a single piece ofhard ev idence; Barack andMichelle Obama were ev identlyprotecting their 47 million "likes"on Facebook)

81 . La wr en ce "La r r y " Su m m er s(Harv ard President who aided

7/12/2014 Americans For Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/01/leader-v-facebook-wall-of-shame.html 19/26

Zuckerberg's light-speed rise toprominence with unprecedentedHarvard Crimson cov erage;Obama bailout chief; ClintonTreasury Secretary ; World BankChief Economist; "SpecialAdv isor" to Marc Andreessen inInstagram; co-creator of thecurrent Russian robber baroneconomy ; close 20-y earrelationships with protégésShery l Sandberg & Yuri Milner;aided in recommendations thatcreated the Russian robber baroneconomy —and YuriMilner/DST/Asmanov 's moneyused to purchase Facebook stock)

82. Ja m es W . Br ey er , A ccelPa r t n er s LLP; Facebookdirector; client of Fenwick & WestLLP since the 1 990's; apparentlyreceiv ed technology from otherFenwick clients that was shuffledto Zuckerberg, incl. LeaderTechnologies' inv entions)

83. Da v i d Pl ou ffe; directed Obama's2008 and 201 2 campaigns; aself-described "statistics nerd;"likely directed the activ ities ofthe Facebook Club; employ edRobert F. Bauer, Perkins Coii LLPin 2000 at the DemocraticCongressional CampaignCommittee

84. McBee St r a t egi c (one of themain "priv ate" arms responsiblefor dolling out the billions inObama "green energy " stimulusfunds; partnered with CooleyGodward LLP)

85. Mi k e Sh eeh y (Cooley -McBeeStrategic principal; formerNational Security Adv iser toHouse Speaker Nancy Pelosi)

86. Na n cy Pel osi (U.S.Congresswoman; appears to berunning political cov er in theHouse for Facebook, McBeeStrategic, Cooley Godward,Fenwick & West, Brey ers, etc.)

87 . Ha r r y R ei d (U.S. Senator; JudgeEv an J. Wallach patron)

88. T h om a s J. K i m (SEC, ChiefCounsel & Assoc. Director)approv ed Facebook's 500-shareholder exemption on Oct.1 4, 2007 , one day after it wassubmitted by Fenwick & WestLLP; Facebook used thisexemption to sell $3 billioninsider stock to the RussiansAlisher Asmanov , Yuri Milner,DST, Digital Sky , Mail.ru whichpumped Facebook's pre-IPOv aluation to $1 00 billion;another Harv ard grad, Kimworked at Latham & Watkins LLPwhich was the chief lobby ist forthe National Venture CapitalAssociation in 2002-2004 whoseChairman was . . . James W.Bey er, Accel Partners LLP; inother words Brey er and Kim, bothHarv ard grads, were associatedat the time of the Zuckerberghacking and theft of LeaderTechnologies' software code)

89. Pi n g Li (Accel Partners,Zuckerberg handler)

90. Ji m Swa r t z (Accel Partners;Zuckerberg handler)

7/12/2014 Americans For Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/01/leader-v-facebook-wall-of-shame.html 20/26

91 . Sh er y l K . Sa n dber g (Facebook,Summers protégé; Facebookdirector)

92. Y u r i Mi l n er (DST aka DigitalSky , Summers protégé; formerBank Menatep executiv e;Facebook director)

93. A l i sh er A sm a n ov (DST akaDigital Sky ; Goldman SachsMoscow partner; Russianoligarch; Friend of the Kremlin;Became the Richest Man in Russiaafter the Facebook IPO)

94. Ma r c L. A n dr eessen(Zuckerberg coach; client ofFenwick & West LLP andChristopher P. King akaChristopher-Charles King akaChristopher King akaChristopher-Charles P. King;Summers' sponsor duringInstagram-scam; Facebookdirector)

95. Pet er T h i el (1 9-y ear oldZuckerberg coach; Pay Pal;Facebook director; CEO, ClarionCapital)

96. Cl a r i on Ca pi t a l (Peter Thiel)

97 . R ei d G. Hoffm a n (1 9-y ear oldZuckerberg coach; Pay Pal;LinkedIn; Facebook director)

98. R i ch a r d W ol per t (AccelPartners)

99. R ober t K et t er son (FidelityVentures; Fidelity EquityPartners; Fidelity VenturesTelecommunications &Technology )

1 00. Da v i d K i l pa t r i ck (BusinessInsider; "The Facebook Effect"; PRcleanse-meister re. Facebookorigins)

1 01 . Z y n ga /Gr ou pon /Li n k edIn /Squ a r e/In st a gr a m ("FacebookMoney /Credits/Bitcoin" feedercompanies)

1 02. T esl a Mot or s (receiv ed $465million in Obama stimulus fundsand hired Cooley 's Michael Rhodesin the sev en months before theLeader v. Facebook trial, justbefore v eteran Judge JosephFarnan made the surpriseannouncement of his retirement,just six day s after Facebook'sdisasterous Markman Hearing)

1 03. Sol y n dr a (receiv ed $535 millionin Obama stimulus at therecommendation of the Cooley -McBee Strategic "consulting"alliance)

1 04. Br i gh t Sou r ce (receiv ed $1 .6billion in Obama stimulus at therecommendation of the Cooley -McBee Strategic "consulting"alliance)

1 05. Joh n P. Br ey er (father of JamesW. Brey er; founder of IDG CapitalPartners - China; coached his sonon exploiting Western marketswhile he quietly built a v enturecapital business in China for thelast 20 y ears; the real brainbehind the Brey er exploitations

1 06. IDG Ca pi t a l Pa r t n er s (Ch i n a )(founded by John P. Brey er, thefather of James W. Brey er, AccelPartners; the current launderer

7/12/2014 Americans For Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/01/leader-v-facebook-wall-of-shame.html 21/26

of the tens of billions James W hasfleeced from the U.S. market fromthe bailout, stimulus and the"pump & dump" Facebook IPOschemes)

1 07 . Gol dm a n Sa ch s (receiv ed USbailout funds; then inv ested withDST in Facebook priv ate stock v iaMoscow; took Facebook public;locked out American inv estorsfrom inv esting)

1 08. Mor ga n St a n l ey (receiv ed USbailout funds; took Facebookpublic; probably participated inov ersees purchases of Facebookpriv ate stock before IPO)

1 09. St a t e St r eet Cor por a t i on(receiv ed U.S. taxpay er bailoutmonies along with GoldmanSachs and Morgan Stanley ;consolodating control of ATMbanking networksinternationally

1 1 0. JP Mor ga n Ch a se (receiv ed U.S.taxpay er bailout monies alongwith Goldman Sachs, MorganStanley and State StreetCorporation)

1 1 1 . Ll oy d Bl a n k fei n (GoldmanSachs, CEO)

1 1 2. Ja m i e Di m on (JP MorganChase,CEO)

1 1 3. St ev e Cu t l er (JP MorganChase,General Counsel)

1 1 4. R odgi n Coh en (JPMorganChase, Outside Counsel;Sulliv an Cromwell, LLP)

1 1 5. U.S. Secu r i t i es & Ex ch a n geCom m i ssi on (granted Fenwick& West's application on behalf ofFacebook for an unpredentedexemption to the 500 shareholderrule; opened the floodgated forGoldman Sachs and MorganStanley to make a priv ate marketin Facebook pre-IPO insider stock;facilitated the influx of billions ofdollars from "dubious" sourcesassociated with Russian oligarchs,Alisher Asmanov and YuriMilner, and the Kremlin;Goldman Sachs is a partner withthis Moscow company , DigitalSky Technologies, aka DST, akaMail.ru)

1 1 6. Jeff Ma r k ey (McBee StrategicLLC; allied with Facebook's CooleyGodward Kronish LLP to arrangeObama's green energy funding;arranged $1 .6 billion for failedBrightSource and $535 millionfor failed Soly ndra)

1 1 7 . St ev e McBee (McBee StrategicLLC; allied with Facebook's CooleyGodward Kronish LLP to arrangeObama's green energy funding;arranged $1 .6 billion for failedBrightSource and $535 millionfor failed Soly ndra)

1 1 8. Mi ch a el F. McGowa n (StrozFriedberg; Facebook forensicexpert who lied about hisknowledge of the contents of the28 Zuckerberg hard driv es andHarv ard Email accounts)

1 1 9. Br y a n J. R ose (Stroz Friedberg;Facebook forensic expert who liedabout his knowledge of thecontents of the 28 Zuckerberg

7/12/2014 Americans For Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/01/leader-v-facebook-wall-of-shame.html 22/26

hard driv es and Harv ard Emailaccounts)

1 20. Dr . Sa u l Gr een ber g (Facebook'sexpert witness from theUniv ersity of Calgary ;disingenuously waiv ed his handsand said he would be "wildguessing" about the purpose of aJav a "sessionstate" importstatement (ev en Jav a newbiesknow it is used for tracking a userwhile in a web session); in short,Dr. Greeberg lied to the jury ,thus discrediting his testimony )

1 21 . T on i T own es-W h i t l ey (CGIFederal; Michelle Obama's 1 985Princeton classmate; CGI"donated" $47 million to theObama campaign; CGI won theno-bid contract to build thewww.healthcare.gov Obamacarewebsite; CGI shut off the securityfeatures on Obama's reelectiondonation sites to increasedonations)

1 22. CGI Feder a l (US div ision of aCanadian company ; Donated $47million to Obama's reelection,then receiv ed the no-bid contractto build the ill-fated Obamacarewebsite; Michelle Obama'sPrinceton classmate, ToniTownes-Whitely , is a Senior VicePresident of CGI; the website isreplete with social features andlinks to Facebook)

1 23. K a t h l een Sebel i u s (Obama'sSecretary of Health & HumanServ ices since 2009 responsiblefor $67 8 million Obamacareimplementation; made thedecision to hire CGI Federal on ano-bid contract despite theev ident conflict of interest withMichelle Obama and $47 millionin Obama campaign donations byCGI; the website is replete withsocial features and links toFacebook)

1 24. T odd Y . Pa r k (White HouseChief Technology Officer (CTO);former CTO for Health & HumanServ ices; chief architect ofHealthCare.gov ; founder,director, CEO, Athenahealth,Inc.; founder, director, CEO,Castlight Health, Inc.)

1 25. Fr a n k M. Sa n ds, Sr . / Fr a n kM. Sa n ds, Jr . (Founder and CEO,respectiv ely , of Sands CapitalManagement LLC; failed to fileS.E.C. Form SC 1 3G acquisitionreports for Athenahealth, Inc.,Baidu, Inc. (ADR) and Facebookstock during 201 2; masked theassociation of Todd Y. Park withAthenahealth, Inc. and Baidu,Inc., and the association of both ofthose companies with theFacebook IPO fraud)

1 26. R obi n "Ha n dsom e R ewa r d"Y a n gon g Li (CEO, Baidu, Inc.(ADR); appointed Jan. 2004, thesame month that MarkZuckerberg obtained LeaderTechnologies' social networkingsource code to start Facebook;R obi n Y . Li is v ery likelyassociated with John P. andJames W. Brey er through theirChinese entities, including IDG

7/12/2014 Americans For Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/01/leader-v-facebook-wall-of-shame.html 23/26

Capital Partners, IDG-Accel andother v ariants; Li appointed ajunior attorney from Fenwick &West LLP, Palo Alto/MountainView, namely Parker Zhang, tobe his "Head of Patents;" Fenwick& West LLP represented bothLeader Technologies, Inc. andAccel Partners LLC in 2002-2003and had Leader's source code intheir files.)

1 27 . Pa r k er Z h a n g ("Head of Patents"at Baidu, Inc. (ADR), appointed inapprox. May 201 2; formerly ajunior Associate attorney atFenwick & West LLP; graduatefrom Michigan Law in 2005)

1 28. Pen n y S. Pr i t z k er (Secretary ,Department of Commerce;replaced Rebecca M. Blank; holdsov er $24 million in Facebook"dark pools" stock, most notably inGoldman Sachs, Morgan Stanleyand JPMorgan)

1 29. R ebecca M. Bl a n k (Secretary ,Department of Commerce;ov ersaw the dubious Leader v .Facebook activ ities of the PatentOffice Director, Dav id J. Kappos,who held ov er one million dollarsin Facebook "dark pools" duringthe Leader v. Facebookproceedings; Kappos purchasedthis stock within weeks of hissurprise recess appointment byPresident Obama; Kappos also wasformerly employ ed by IBM, whosold Facebook 7 50 patents duringthe Leader v. Facebookproceedings; right before leav ingthe Patent OFfice, Kappos alsoordered an unprecedented 3rdreexamination of Leader's patentwithout ev en identify ing claims)

1 30. Ma r y L. Sch a pi r o (Chairman,Securities & ExchangeCommission; holds 51 Facebook"dark pools" stocks which heldstock in Facebook, Baidu andmore than a dozen Facebookcrony companies; failed toregulate the "dark pools;" failed todisclose her substantial conflict ofinterest in regulating the run upto the Facebook IPO)

1 31 . R ober t C. Ha n cock (ChiefCompliance Officer, Sands CapitalManagement, LLC; failed to fileS.E.C. Form SC 1 2G notice ofacquisition reports forAthenahealth, Baidu andFacebook during the period of theFacebook IPO in 201 2; thisconduct masked the conflicts ofinterest of Todd Y. Park, who wasappointed by President Obama tobe the U.S. Chief TechnologyOfficer during this same period;Todd Y. Park is/has been founder,director and CEO of bothAthenahealth and CastlightHealth; Todd Y. Park deeplyembedded the software fromAthenahealth and CastlightHealth into HealthCare.gov whenhe was CTO at Health & HumanServ ices; none of these conflicts ofinterest were disclosed; Todd Y.Park's ethics pledges and reportsare missing from the Office ofGov ernment Ethics)

1 32. Jon a t h a n Goodm a n (Chief

7/12/2014 Americans For Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/01/leader-v-facebook-wall-of-shame.html 24/26

Counsel, Sands CapitalManagement, LLC; failed to fileS.E.C. Form SC 1 2G notice ofacquisition reports forAthenahealth, Baidu andFacebook during the period of theFacebook IPO in 201 2; thisconduct masked the conflicts ofinterest of Todd Y. Park, who wasappointed by President Obama tobe the U.S. Chief TechnologyOfficer during this same period;Todd Y. Park is/has been founder,director and CEO of bothAthenahealth and CastlightHealth; Todd Y. Park deeplyembedded the software fromAthenahealth and CastlightHealth into HealthCare.gov whenhe was CTO at Health & HumanServ ices; none of these conflicts ofinterest were disclosed; Todd Y.Park's ethics pledges and reportsare missing from the Office ofGov ernment Ethics; Goodmanwas formerly employ ed by GibsonDunn LLP, Facebook appealscounsel in Leader v. Facebook)

1 33. T r i p A dl er ("Co-Founder" ofScribd; Harv ard contemporariesof Mark Zuckerberg with adubious orgins story , likeZuckerberg's; Scribd held AFIdocuments for two y ears, thensummarily deleted the entirelibrary without warning on Fri.Mar. 7 , 201 4; AFI's librarycontained only public documentsand much ev idence prov ing theLeader v. Facebook judicialcorruption)

1 34. Ja r ed Fr i edm a n ("Co-Founder"of Scribd; Harv ardcontemporaries of MarkZuckerberg with a dubious orginsstory , like Zuckerberg's; Scribdheld AFI documents for two y ears,then summarily deleted theentire library without warningon Fri. Mar. 7 , 201 4; AFI'slibrary contained only publicdocuments and much ev idenceprov ing the Leader v. Facebookjudicial corruption)

D. Facebook boy-pu ppets:

1 35. Ma r k E. Z u ck er ber g

1 36. Ch r i s Hu gh es

1 37 . Du st i n Mosk owi t z

1 38. Edu a r do Sa v er i n

1 39. Ma t t h ew R . Coh l er

1 40. El on Mu sk

E. Cor r uptionW a tch—Paten tOffice Ju dges:

1 41 . A n der son , Gr egg

1 42. Best , Geor ge

1 43. Bon i l l a , Ja ck i e W .

1 44. Bou ch er , Pa t r i ck

1 45. Br a den , Geor gi a n n a W .

1 46. Br a n ch , Gen e

1 47 . Bi sk , Jen n i fer Br esson

7/12/2014 Americans For Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/01/leader-v-facebook-wall-of-shame.html 25/26

1 48. Bu i , Hu n g H.

1 49. Bu sch , Ju st i n

1 50. Cl em en t s, Ma t t

1 51 . Cr u m bl ey , K i t

1 52. Dr oesch , K r i st en

1 53. El l u r u , R a m a

1 54. Fi t z pa t r i ck , Mi ch a el

1 55. Ger st en bl i t h , Ba r t A .

1 56. Gi a n n et t i , T h om a s L.

1 57 . Gu est , R a e Ly n n

1 58. Ha st i n gs, K a r en M.

1 59. Hoff, Ma r c

1 60. Hor n er , Li n da

1 61 . Hu gh es, Ja m es R .

1 62. Hu m e, La r r y

1 63. Ja m es, Hou sel

1 64. Ju n g, Hu n g J.

1 65. K a m h ol z , Scot t

1 66. K a t z , Debor a h

1 67 . Lu ca s, Ja y

1 68. Ma cDon a l d, A l l en R . (biounav ailable) – Leader 3rdreexam judge (bio and conflictslog concealed by FOIA)

1 69. Ma h a n ey , A l ex a n dr a

1 7 0. Ma r t i n , Br et t

1 7 1 . McK on e, Da v e

1 7 2. McNa m a r a , Br i a n

1 7 3. Medl ey , Sa l l y

1 7 4. Moor e, Br y a n

1 7 5. Moor e, Ja m es T – Leader 3rdreexam judge (bio and conflictslog concealed by FOIA)

1 7 6. Mor ga n , Ja son V .

1 7 7 . Mor r i son , Joh n

1 7 8. Pa k , Ch u n g K .

1 7 9. Per r y , Gl en n J.

1 80. Pet r a v i ck , Mer edi t h C. (bioand conflicts log concealed byFOIA) – Leader 3rd reexam judge

1 81 . Pet t i gr ew, Ly n n e

1 82. Pr a i ss, Don n a

1 83. Qu i n n , Mi r i a m

1 84. R ei m er s, A n n et t e

1 85. Sa i n don , W i l l i a m

1 86. Sca n l on , Pa t r i ck

1 87 . Si u , St eph en C. – Leader 3rdreexam judge (bio and conflictslog concealed by FOIA)

1 88. Sm i t h , Ja m es Don a l d

1 89. Sm i t h , Nei l

1 90. Sn edden , Sh er i da n

1 91 . Son g, Da n i el

1 92. Spa h n , Ga y A n n

1 93. St r a u ss, Mi k e

1 94. T i m m , Ca t h er i n e

1 95. W h i t e, St a cey

1 96. Z ech er , Mi ch a el

R esea r ch T i p:Ty pe any name or subject in the Googlesearch at the top of this webpage. Thatwill show y ou any relev ant links withinthe sites that we hav e been following

7/12/2014 Americans For Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAME

http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/01/leader-v-facebook-wall-of-shame.html 26/26

and inv estigating in the Leader v.Facebook case. Vigilance ev ery one!American democracy is at risk.

Author and Site attribution is sufficient. Simple template. Powered by Blogger.