LEAD-BASED PAINT RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR …
Transcript of LEAD-BASED PAINT RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR …
LEAD-BASED PAINT RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT
FOR
PEDRICKTOWN ARMY RESERVE BASE BUILDING NOS 120 177 179 276 277 278
QUARTERS NOS 120N 120S 132C 132D 132E 132G 132H 1321 132J 132L 132M
PEDRICKTOWN NJ
Prepared for
Department of the Army US Garrison Fort Dix
Fort Dix NJ 08640-5505 Attn AFZT-EHP (Mr Buerster)
Prepared by
Ogden Environmental and Energy Services Co Inc 1777 Sentry Parkway West Abington Hall Suite 300
Blue Bell PA 19422 (215) 654-1620
July 28 1994
03-200-013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 10 INTRODUCTION 11 Scope 12 Purpose 13 General
SECTION 20 GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION 21 Building Information 22 Areas Tested
SECTION 30 METHODOLOGY 31 Field Survey Methods 32 Laboratory Testing Program
SECTION 40 ASSESSMENT RESULTS 41 General Assessment of Conditions 42 Previous LBP Abatement Modernization or Extraordinary Maintenance 43 Management and Maintenance Staffing 44 Painting Policy and Preventive Maintenance 45 Worker Training and Protection
SECTION 50 CONCLUSIONS amp RECOMMENDATIONS 51 Conclusions 52 Recommendations
521 Recommendations for Building No 120 522 Recommendations for Building Nos 177 179 276 277 278
FIGURES Figure 1 First Floor
APPENDICES A Field Sample Collection Sheets B Laboratory Test Results
10 INTRODUCTION
On June 6 through June 14 1994 Ogden conducted a Lead-Based Paint Risk Assessment survey for the following buildings located on the Pedricktown Army Reserve Base Pedricktown NJ Building numbers - 120 179 177N 177S 276N 276S 277N 277S 278N 278S This assessment included garages associated with each building This risk assessment survey was conducted for the Department of the Army US Garrison Fort Dix Fort Dix NJ The work was performed under contract number DAC61-93-D-0008 Work Order No 1
11 SCOPE
The scope of services provided and the technical procedures employed in this Lead-Based Paint Risk Assessment were conducted in accordance with the general requirements set forth in the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Lead Based Paint (LBP) Policy and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Lead Based Paint Risk Assessment Protocol dated September 1992 The work was also performed in accordance with the OSHA Standard CFR 19101025 Any subsequent revisions to these guidelines may require additional work
The scope of the Lead-Based Paint Risk Assessment included an assessment of painted and varnished surfaces performance of field inspections and environmental sample collection laboratory analysis and preparation of a report detailing where and at what concentrations lead in household dust and lead in soil were found
12 PURPOSE
The purpose of the Lead-Based Paint Risk Assessment was to evaluate current Army policies employed at the Pedricktown Army Reserve Base regarding the ability to contain and minimize potential lead based paint exposure hazards in residential buildings to inspect and assess existing conditions by the collection of dust wipe and soil samples in accordance with the protocols identified above and to make recommendations for the remediation and management of identified hazards
13 GENERAL
No previous surveys were noted during the preparation of this report The findings of this report have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted practice of the Lead-Based Paint Testing and Abatement industry
1
The observations and test results presented in this report are time dependent and conditions may change The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based upon the observations and test results obtained in the field and information provided by Base personnel
and residents during the field survey If any deviations from the conditions noted are encountered during abatement operations they could change the recommendations contained within this report and should be brought to the attention of Ogden
This report has been prepared for the use of the Department of the Army for the specific application to the Residential Quarters of the Pedricictown Army Reserve Base Pedricktown NJ
2
20 GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
21 BUILDING INFORMATION
This risk assessment included the assessment of the following buildings 120 177 179 276 277 and 278 Building 120 was constructed in 1918 middotand consists of a concrete foundation with a wood frame and wood siding Buildings 177 179 276 277 and 278 were constructed in 1939-1940 These buildings all consist of a concrete and brick foundation with brick exterior walls All of the buildings contain windows made of vinyl casement or wood wooden entry doors and wood trim The roofs are pitched with a wood frame and shingle cover The buildings all consist of two single family Quarters except for Building No 179 which is one single family Quarter The following table identifies the buildings and associated Quarters which were surveyed
Building Number Quarter Number
120 Quarters 120 N 120 S
177 Quarters 131 I 132 J
179 Quarters 132 C
276 Quarters 132 G 132 H
277 Quarters 132 I 132 J
278 Quarters 132 L 132 M
The buildings have a first floor second floor and a basement
22 AREAS TESTED
All above referenced buildings was inspected and assessed in accordance with the protocols established in the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Policy and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Lead-Based Paint Risk Assessment Protocol dated September 1992
The testing included the collection of soil samples outside of the building and the collection of dust wipe samples inside of the building The soil samples were taken from the ground surface surrounding the building The wipe samples were taken from window wells window sills and floor sample locations The samples were located in accordance with the referenced guidance documents
3
30 METHODOLOGY
31 FIELD SURVEY
The assessment was conducted hased on the risk middot assessment field inspection and sample collection protocols established in the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Policy and the Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Lead-Based Paint Risk Assessment Protocol dated September 1992 The requirements of the DOD and HUD protocols middot are fundamentally the same Where deviations were noted the more stringent requirements were applied
For each of the Quarters assessed the following dust wipe samples were collected
Location Component Number of Samples
Inside entrance Floor 1
Kitchen Floor 1
Window WellSill 1
Living Room Floor 1
Window WellSill 1
Bedroom 1 Floor 1
Window WellSill 1
Bedroom 2 Floor 1
Window WellSill 1
Total 9
Wipe samples were collected inside the building using sterile latex surgical gloves to prevent contamination of the sample The samples were collected using a commercial wipe with a non -alcohol wetting agent and placed in a 50 ml polypropylene sample container and shipped for laboratory analyses The wipe samples were taken by wiping any dust off of the surface sampled in a 1 square foot area for floos from the entire window sill
4
Two composite soil samples were collected at each building and each garage The first sample was collected around the building foundation in an area less than three (3) feet from the structure The second sample was collected around the building perimeter in area between approximately 15 - 20 feet from the structure
The soil samples were also taken from the playground at the Pedricktown Army Reserve Base
Soil samples were collected using sterile latex surgical gloves to prevent contamination of the a sample The sample was collected in a 50 ml polypropylene sample container and shipped for laboratory analysis
Based on the conditions encountered at each site additional samples were collected as necessary
32 LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM
All dust wipe and soil samples were shipped to Housing Environmental Services Inc s Laboratory in Cambridge Massachusetts for analysis for lead concentration by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry according to the modified NIOSH 7082 method In addition to the wipe and soil samples which were collected a representative number of blank wipe samples were also collected and sent to the laboratory The blank was obtained by removing a commercial wipe from the package while wearing sterile gloves and immediately placing it in a sample container The blank sample was provided to confirm the sampling procedures were not contributing to the level of the contaminant concentration in the sample result
The samples were analyzed to determine if they had results which were above the permissible threshold limits established in the guidance documents
5
40 ASSESSMENT RESULTS
41 GENERAL ASSESSMENT OF CONDITIONS
One objective of the assessment is to evaluate the conditions of the area surveyed This survey includes a visual observation of the paint conditions The survey also includes an assessment of previous projects which may have abated lead based paint Also management maintenance and training is assessed during the risk assessment
During the inspection of the family housing units located on the Pedricktown Army Reserve Base an assessment of suspect LBP surfaces was made This assessment found surfaces to vary greatly from unit to unit and from interior surfaces to exterior surfaces of each unit Interiors of occupied units were generally in fair to good condition Interiors of vacant units ranged from good to poor Notable areas of interior damage were found in Quarters 132L where approximately fifty percent of the ceiling in the north living room had collapsed due to lightning damage The interiors of the two units in Building Number 120 were severely deteriorated Most painted surfaces were severely peeling and floors in many rooms were collapsed in Building 120
Unit exteriors with the exception of Building Number 120 were uniform All wooden trim and porch structures were in very poor condition The paint on these components was found to contain very high concentrations of lead through XRF analysis It was apparent that the deteriorating paint was substantially contributing to the high levels of lead in the soil at the unit foundations All brick surfaces were unpainted and in very good condition A complete listing of building components and their assessed conditions can be found in Appendix A of the comprehensive testing reports for each unit
42 PREVIOUS LBP ABATEMENT MODERNIZATION OR EXTRAORDINARY MAINTENANCE
Information regarding any systematic LBP abatement projects was not provided Upon inspection it was apparent replacement of windows and unit entry doors had been conducted The window replacement project did not include the kitchen or basement windows in most units These remaining surfaces were found to contain high levels of lead in paint and dust
Upon inspection of the units no substantial maintenance work was apparent except for window and door replacement middot The removal and replacement of the windows and doors most likely created a substantial amount of lead dust basedmiddot on the high concentration of lead in the remaining components Specifics as to when the work was conducted and what types of work and clean-up procedures were implemented was not provided prior to this report
6
Information detailing lead abatement projects was not provided Based on the inspection of the units it is apparent that no organized LBP abatement projects have been conducted at this site Results of the comprehensive LBP survey and of the risk assessment samples indicate high levels of lead paint and lead dust remain in each of the units inspected
43 MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE STAFFING
Based on the information provided by the Housing Engineer maintenance work is contracted out and generally performed during vacancy unless an emergency presents itself Management of the maintenance contracts is conducted through the Chief of Contract Management at the Pedricktown base Upon vacancy an inspection of the unit is conducted by personnel from the maintenance department During this inspection items in need of repair are noted and the work is repaired prior to occupancy This inspection process does not take potential lead paint hazards into account nor does it initiate lead paint repair and clean-up procedures prior to reoccupancy This system does appear to be effective for general interior maintenance items but exteriors do not appear to be addressed
A complete preventive maintenance policy manual describing painting procedures and surface preparation that could potentially disturb lead-painted surfaces was not available for review prior to this report
Work orders are addressed on an as needed basis preferably during unit turnover or if an emergency presents itself Discussions with residents indicated that it often takes several requests before maintenance personnel conduct repairs
44 PAINTING POLICY AND PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE
The repainting policy for units at the Pedricktown base is to repaint upon vacancy or every three years but generally not during occupation Painting is performed by an outside contractor This policy appears to apply to the interior surfaces only
The interior surfaces were noted to be in good condition in all occupied units except for Building 120 The exterior wooden porches and building trim were noted to be in very poor condition for all units inspected Conditions indicate that itmiddothas been much longer than three years since these areas have been maintained Deteriorating exterior surfaces appear to be a substantial source of lead contamination in the living environments and should be addressed immediately
45 WORKER TRAINING AND PROTECTION
According to the housing engineer maintenance is performed by outside contract and apparently all required training is the responsibility of the contractor Ogden was not informed of any training programs for base maintenance personnel relative to lead-based paint clean-up abatement or clearance procedures
7
50 CONCLUSIONS amp RECOMMENDATIONS
51 CONCLUSIONS
This risk assessment report included the assessment of the Residential Quarters at Pedricktown Army Reserve Base Pedricktown NJ The risk assessment survey included the collection of 141 samples for laboratory analysis These samples were submitted for laboratory analysis to determine if they had results measuring above the permissible threshold limits established by the Base Realignment and Closure Lead-Based Paint Policy and the Department of Housing and Urban Development Lead-Based Paint Risk Assessment Protocol dated September 1992 guidance documents These permissible threshold limits are listed as follows
Window wells 800 ugft2
Window sills 500 ugft2
Floors 200 ugft2
Soils 500 ppm
Appendix A contains the results of the sampling performed for this assessment
The comprehensive LBP testing program conducted for these units and their associated garages established exterior wooden trim components to contain lead above the action level of 10 mg cm2
bull The assessment of these surfaces determined all to be in poor to very poor condition It is clear that the deterioration of these components is a substantial cause of contamination of soil around the unit foundations and is likely to be contributing to the contamination of interior floors
A complete listing of all painted or varnished surfaces is included in the comprehensive LBP testing report in Appendix A
52 RECOMMENDATIONS
521 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BUILDING NO 120
Based on the deteriorated condition and the extreme levels of lead contamination in these units it is recommended that they be secured utilizing a chain link fence notmiddot less than six ( 6) feet high The fencing should extend in an area around the perimeter of the building not less than 15 feet from the structure This measure of security should be maintained until complete abatement can be completed
8
522 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BUILDING NOS 177 179 276 277 278
Ogden recommends that either in-house capabilities be developed or a maintenance contractor who is trained equipped and certified to conduct LBP abatement and clean-up work be employed to address any maintenancerepair work that may disturb LBP surfaces This work would include any repairs and cleaning conducted during routine maintenance or renovations or as part of an on-going in-place management program
Ogden recommends the comprehensive testing data should be consulted prior to conducting any maintenancerenovation projects to ensure that the work does not disturb known or suspect LBP surfaces without taking appropriate precautions All outside contractors should be notified of known or suspect LBP surfaces in order to ensure that their work plans will be conducted in accordance with the requirements established by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for lead related projects
Ogden recommends personnel conducting facility maintenance inspections should be trained to identify and assess potential LBP hazards Inspection personnel should incorporate LBP testing and risk assessment information in their inspection process Work orders to remedy potential hazards should be submitted immediately and treated on a priority basis
Ogden recommends the appropriate maintenance and contract management staff and any subordinates responsible for the oversight or execution of maintenance work renovation contracts receive training in accordance with the requirements established in the DOD LBP policy Should other military personnel conduct work disturbing known or suspect LBP surfaces it is recommended they receive appropriate worker or supervisory training covering topics outlined in the DOD LBP policy
Ogden recommends all building occupants be notified of existing LBP conditions detailing locations of known or suspected surfaces above the action levels Residents should be instructed not to disturb any known or suspect painted surfaces unless proper precautions are initiated Residents should be encouraged to report any defective paint film to the designated maintenance authority in order for it to be cleaned and repaired properly Educational programs should be developed to instruct residents in proper procedures to minimize exposure to lead in their living environments The program should include an explanation of health effects pathways of exposure methods to minimize exposure age groups at high risk dietary considerations and availability of blood screening or medical monitoring programs for small children The resident education program should emphasize housekeeping and home maintenance practices to minimize lead-based paint disturbance
Ogden recommends that all inconclusive surfaces be confirmed through chip sample analysis prior to any renovation work andor interiorexterior paint stabilization work that may disturb surfaces that have not been conclusively identified as to their lead content All non-intact
9
surfaces should be evaluated and repaired in order to prevent recontamination of the building after in-place management
_ Ogden recommends the following in-place management procedures to remediate the conditions assessed at the Residential Quarters at Pedricktown Army Reserve Base in this report The recommendations include environmental clean-up paint stabilization and soil remediation and should be performed at the earliest date possible All in-place management work should be conducted by trained and qualified personnel in accordance with the lead hazard abatement procedures established in the DOD LBP policy Due to the extremely poor condition of some painted surfaces a careful analysis of the economic benefit of in-place management of the material versus the complete abatement should be considered
Window wellsWindow sills
Dust wipe sample results indicate that approximately 35 - 45 of all samples collected from window wells or window sills were above the permissible threshold limit It is recommended that all window wells and window sills be cleaned according to the following procedures (Windows which have been replaced with vinyl casements should be thoroughly cleaned utilizing HEP A vacuums and Tri-Sodium Phosphate detergents Associated painted or wooden components should be handled as specified below)
a) Residents should not be permitted inside the area during this work
b) All furniture should be removed from the work area or covered with plastic and all edges of the plastic sealed with tape to prevent dust from penetrating the plastic barrier The floor should be covered with 6-mil plastic sheeting for a distance of eight (8) feet from themiddot work area
c) Respiratory protection and protective clothing measures are to be employed for this clean-up unless it can be documented through a pilot program that some or all protective measures are not necessary
d) Use a HEPA vacuum to clean all window sills window wells and surrounding window trim After vacuuming using a paint scraping tool gently remove all loose non-intact paint from the window sills window trim window stops window wells and sashes To control dust and paint chips from circulating the area being scraped should be misted continually during scraping After scraping vacuum all dust and paint chips from the entire window area once again
e) Upon completion of the second stage of HEPA vacuuming apply one (1) coat of latex enamel primer and one (1) coat of latex enamel finish paint to previously painted surfaces
10
t) Upon completion of the painting stage using a phosphate detergent wash the lower portion of the windows thoroughly (include the sashes track sill stop and well) After the phosphate wash HEP A vacuum the window areas again to capture any residual dust
g) When finished carefully fold plastic inward and vacuum all debris (ie paint chips dust etc) from the center of the plastic It is critical to remove visible debris from the plastic in order for the plastic to be disposed of as common rather than hazardous waste
h) Use a HEPA vacuum to clean all floor areas With a phosphate detergent wash the floors thoroughly (include the door thresholds and exterior entry landings) HEP A vacuum the floors again to capture any residual dust
i) Wipe samples should be collected from one (1) window sillwell in each room (with a maximum of two (2) bedrooms per unit) to verify the effectiveness of cleanup measures The windows sampled should be different from those sampled during the risk assessment process if possible
j) The initial clean-up should be re-evaluated in six (6) months (from the time of the initial cleaning) by collecting wipe samples The window sillswells sampled should be different from those sampled after the initial clean-up process if possible At least one window sillwell in each room with a maximum of two (2) bedrooms per unit should be sampled
Floors
For all areas listed above where floor samples were found abovemiddot the threshold limit of 200 ugft2
the following cleaning procedures should be implemented in each of the rooms listed
a) Residents should not be permitted inside the area during this work
b) All furniture and equipment should be removed from the work area or covered with poly
c) Respiratory protection and protective clothing measures should be employed for this clean-up unless it can be documented through a pilot program that some or all protective measures are not necessary
d) Use a HEPA vacuum to clean all floor areas With a phosphate detergent wash the floors thoroughly(include the door thresholds and stair treads) HEPA vacuum the floors again to capture any residual dust
11
e) Collect wipe samples from each of the rooms (with a maximum of two (2) bedrooms per unit) and one (1) stair tread The floor areas sampled should be different from those sampled during the risk assessment process if possible These clearance procedures shall be applied to all reoccupancy practices for all units until fully abated
t) The initial clean-up should be evaluated in six (6) months (from the time the areas are first cleaned) by collecting wipe samples Floor samples should be collected at different areas than those sampled for clearance after the initial clean-up if possible Wipe samples should be collected from each of the rooms in the unit (with a maximum of two (2) bedrooms per unit) and one (1) stair tread
Soils
Soil samples collected along the northeast corner of the building near the foundation were found to be above the threshold level of 500 PPM It is recommended that at a minimum all visible paint chips be removed utilizing HEP A vacuums or soil removal methods The area should then be covered with clean top soil in an area not less than three (3) feet from the structure Sod or other secure ground covering should be established in areas
All exterior components contributing to soil contamination should be evaluated and repaired to ensure recontamination does not occur These surfaces should be addressed on a priority basis to ensure areas are not rapidly recontaminated Due to the poor condition of some painted surfaces a careful analysis of the economic benefit of in-place management of the material versus the complete abatement should be considered All in-place management work should be conducted by trained and qualified personnel in accordance with the lead hazard abatement procedures established in the DOD LBP policy
Interior Surfaces in Poor Condition
For any interior areas where samples were found above the threshold limits and the paint was in poor condition the following cleaning procedures should be implemented
a) All interior windows should be closed during the remediation work
b) Residents should not be permitted within the work area while any remediation work is taking place
c) Respiratory protection and protective clothing measures shall be employed for this clean up unless the Department of the Army can document through a pilot program that some or all protective measures are not necessary
d) Any movable objects near the work site should be removed before work begins Any objects that cannot be moved should be thoroughly covered with 6 mil plastic and remain
12
covered until the remediation work is complete Plastic should also be secured to cover the entire floor within the room where the work is being performed
e) Moisten all painted surfaces to be treated with water using a spray bottle Gently scrape any loose paint and remove all dust with a HEP A vacuum paint scraping attachment Apply a paint primer coat and two coats of latex enamel to seal the areas after scraping Respirators should be worn at all times when destructive measures are employed
t) When finished carefully fold plastic inward and vacuum all debris from the center of the plastic All debris and dust must be removed and the plastic can be disposed of as common waste and not hazardous waste
g) Visually inspect work area and HEP A vacuum areas on the floor where paint chips have escaped the plastic sheeting
h) Collect one wipe sample in each area where remediation work is performed to verify the effectiveness of the clean up measures The limits referenced above should be applied to determine the effectiveness
i) The interior of the unit should then be inspected on an annual basis until they are abated to insure that the condition of the paint has not deteriorated
Exterior Surf aces in Poor Condition
For any exterior surfaces areas where samples were found above the threshold limits and the paint is in poor condition the following cleaning procedures should be implemented
a) All windows should be closed during the remediation work
b) Residents should not be permitted within the work area while any remediation work is taking place
c) Respiratory protection and protective clothing measures shall be employed for this clean up unless the Department of the Army can document through a pilot program that some or all protective measures are not necessary
d) Any movable objects near the work site should be removed before work begins Any objects that cannot be moved should be thoroughly covered with 6 mil plastic and remain covered until the remediation work is complete Plastic should also be secured at least 16 feet in all directions surrounding the immediate work area
e) Moisten all painted surfaces to be treated with water using a spray bottle Gently scrape any loose paint and remove all dust with a HEP A vacuum paint scraping attachment Apply a paint primer coat and two coats of latex enamel to seal the areas after scraping
13
Respirators should be worn at all times when destructive measures are employed
f) When finished carefully fold plastic inward and vacuum all debris from the center of the plastic All debris and dust must be removed and the plastic can be disposed of as common waste and not hazardous waste
g) Visually inspect work area and HEPA vacuum areas on the ground where paint chips have escaped the plastic sheeting
h) Collect one soil sample in each area where remediation work is performed to verify the effectiveness of the clean up measures The limits referenced above should be applied to determine the effectiveness
i) The interior of the unit should then be inspected on an annual basis until they are abated to insure that the condition of the paint has not deteriorated
14
APPENDIX A
FIELD SAMPLE COLLECTION LOG
7
Pedricktown Army Reserve Base RISK ASSESSMENT
ASSESSOR Eric Whiston
BUILDING NUMBER 120S DATE June 13 1994
UNIT ADDRESS Quarters 120S CONTROL NUMBER 694033
SAMPLES TESTING ABOVE PERMISSIBLE THRESHOLDS ~middot ~ ~~~ J gt-~middot x ~~1~t~F-~ ~-ltiJr~~~~J)~ffeI~i~M~~tl~gt1~~r ~ middott~
Sample Subst WipeCondNo Type Room Surface Substrate Dimensions HK Sample Comments Unit Comments Results
2 w Ent~ Fo~er Floor Wood F 1200 X 1200 P at front ent~ vacant unit - sever~ deteriorated 3587 ugft2
3 w Kitchen Floor Vinyl p 900 X 900 p sampled at rear entry to porch -1)deg- 466 ugft2
4 w Kitchen Window Sill Wood p 300 X 2400 p sampled at window to porch 5028 ugft2
5 w living Room Floor Wood p 1200 X 1200 p sampled under middle window east wall 1142 ugft2
6 j J gtw living Room Window Sill Wood p 350 X 2400 p sampled at middle sill east wall 1 JC-middot 16029 ugft2
w Bedroom 1 Floor Wood p 1200 X 1200 p sampled at radiator 787 ugft2
8 w Bedroom 1 Window Well Wood p 400 X 1300 p sampled at east window north side 7Jo 5lt7 ~ 590538 ugft2
9
10
w w
Bedroom 3
Bedroom 3
Floor
Window Well
Wood
Wood
p
p 1200 X 1200
400 X 1300
P p
sampled at the entry to bedroom 3
sampled at the north window on the west wall 7_) J ~middotAc
7 f gt
435 ugft2
753923 ugft2
11 s Ext Found 000 X 000 samdiiled around the south half of the buil in~ foundation Large quantity of eaint a I around foundation
23073 ppm
12 s Ext Yard 000 X 000 sampled around building perimeter (south hali Some paint chips noted 1O to 15 rom house
521 ppm
SAMPLES TESTING BELOW PERMISSIBLE THRESHOLDS ~~ii~ l~ gtmiddot~~ ~i~gt middot ~~middotmiddot~fi- f_pound ~~~(1~vj4 ~~~~JJ middot_bullJt i~~ tfmiddot~tbull)tr7f _~i~r)~i~~( ~~middot(Jmiddot-(t r2~ lt J middot~imiddot~~~r~~~Jtaftmiddot~41i~frt-W~ith~~ - H
Sample Subst Wipe No Type Room Surface Substrate Cond Dimensions HK Sample Comments Unit Comments Results
W BLANK 000 X 000 Field blank 1 ugft2
Codes B22nt ~ CondjtjoQ Lead Content Thresholds Ext = Exterior Playgrd = Playground G = Good Window Wells = 800 ugft2 Soil = 500 parts per million Found = Foundation Equip = Equipmentmiddot F = Fair Window Sills= 500 ugft2 Paint= 5000 parts per million
P = Poor Floors = 200 ugft2
16
17
21
Pedricktown Army Reserve Base RISK ASSESSMENT
ASSESSOR Eric Whiston
BUILDING NUMBER 120N DATE June 14 1994
UNIT ADDRESS Quarters 120N CONTROL NUMBER 694033
SAMPLES TESTING ABOVE PERMISSIBLE THRESHOLDS tmiddotf~Y~~~ ~- ~r~-~_~lmiddotZ~jltr-~-)~ j) middota_bullgtmiddot
Sample middot Subst Wipe No Type Room Surface Substrate Cond Dimensions HK Sample Comments Unit Comments Results
13 w Entry Foyer Floor Vinyl F 1200x 1200 P sampled at entry to porch 12060 ugft2
14 w Kitchen Floor Vin~I p 1200 X 1200 P sameled at rear ent~ ceiling collaesed and on floor 618 ugft2 p15 w Kitchen Window Sill Wood F 750 X 2700 sampled at window to porch 516 ugft2
pw Living Room Floor Wood 1200 X 1200 P sampled at dining room entry 1873 ugft2
w Living Room Window Sill Wood p 300 X 2400 p sampled at south window on east wall 50500 ugft2
18 w Bedroom 1 Floor Wood p 1200 X 1200 p sampled at south side of radiator under west window
12475 ugft2
19 w Bedroom 1 Window Well Wood p 400 X 1700 p sampled at south window on the west wall Z70 1
bullbull
~~ 2706 ugft2
20 w Bedroom 3 Floor Wood p 1200 X 1200 P sampled at entry 1764 ugft2
w Bedroom 3 Window Well Wood p 400 X 1800 p sampled at northwest window 136700 ugft2
22 s Ext Found 000 X 000 sampled at building foundation around north half of building
11522 ppm
23 s Ext Yard 000 X 000 sampled around perimeter of the north half of the building
608 ppm
24 s Ext Found 000 X 000 sampled around the foundation of the araae 130
1873 ppm
SAMPLES TESTING BELOW PERMISSIBLE THRESHOLDS iiryen~(middot~middot1 j ~Z-~-rfmiddot~-~- ~ 1 J f ~ ~Lt~middot~~~~J lt~~ bull_)-gtigtJf~middott ~iii- J(J~r~middot~)~4~-tmiddot~- ~- ~~~-trJi~tri(~i7~ ll~~middotil JftJt1t~ ~ r _bullmiddotmiddot
Sample Subst Wipe No Type Room Surface Substrate Cond Dimensions HK Sample Comments Unit Comments Results
25 s Ext Yard OOOx 000 sampled around the perimeter of the 252 ppm araae 130
Codes Sample TypesW=Wipe
~ Ext = Exterior
~ Playgrd = Playground
Condition G = Good
Lead Content Thresholds Window Wells = 800 ugft2 Soil = 500 parts per million
s = Soil Found = Foundation Equip = Equipment F = Fair Window Sills = 500 ugft2 Paint = 5000 parts per million p = Paint P = Poor Floors = 200 ugft2
28
t
Pedricktown Army Reserve Base RISK ASSESSMENT
ASSESSOR Eric Whiston
BUILDING NUMBER 278N DATE June 13 1994
UNIT ADDRESS Quarters 132L CONTROL NUMBER 694033
-~SAMPLES TESTING ABOVE PERMISSIBLE THRESHOLDS i_ h-rtl~ ~r~ io1gtt(1 Ilt~)_~ i~j ~~-1~11middot~- fPri-~H ~ r ltt~fi1 rri~t111~v~ ~ Lltf t- ~ r J~~~ fqJ )gtt ~~ f~t~lti~f~rf(tiKt~ (t
Sample Subst WipeCondNo Type Room Surface Substrate Dimensions HK Sample Comments Unit Comments Results
w Kitchen Window Well Wood p 400 X 2300 p samcfcled at west ~only) window This 45587 ugft2 win ow is origlna wooden type all y~ middotrtemiddot others are vinl~ casement
29 w Entry Foyer Floor Vinyl G 1200 x 1200 G sampled at front entry 1621 ugft2
31 w living Room Window Sill Wood F 300 X 3900 G sampled at the east window (sill 1270 ugft2
SAMPLES TESTING BELOW PERMISSIBLE THRESHOLDS ~iii-P-~~ ti~ 111middotJy ~ ~- ~ r i)trt~ 1 ~~~t l1l f~middot ~ ~ ltmiddot~deg ~ ~~(i fJi~l1ct)-r~jpound-~-7~~ lf~ ~) i~rmiddot- t~~ ~i~)tJ (~~- 1~~~~1~j~-- r~t J ~ Sample Subst Wipe
CondNo Type Room Surface Substrate Dimensions HK Sample Comments Unit Comments Results
26 1 w BLANK 000 X 000 field blank -lt~5 19 ugft2
27 w Kitchen Floor Vinyl G 1200x 1200 G sampled at rear entry 75 ugft2
30 w Living Room Floor Wood G 1200 x 1200 G sampled in the north living room(sun 27 ugft2 room) under the middle window on the north wall
32 w Bedroom 1 Floor Wood G 1200 x 1200 G sampled at entry -lt 1 7 16 ugft2
33 w Bedroom 1 Window Well Vinyl G 350 X 2900 G sampled at west window -1 ~ 47 ugft2
34 w Bedroom 2 Floor Wood G 1200 x 1200 G sampled at north wall center 111 ugft2
35 w Bedroom 2 Window Well Wood G 350 X 2900 G sampled at north window e-middot ~1 27 ugft2
36 s Ext Found 000 X 000 sam~led around building foundation 459 ppm visa teeaint chies
37 s Ext Yard 000 X 000 sampled around perimeter of building - 228 ppm north half
38 s Ext Found 000 X 000 sampled around foundation of garage 489 ppm 288 paint chips near building primarily under windows and at front entry doors on pavement
39 s Ext Yard 000 X 000 sampled around perimeter of garage 288
256 ppm
Codes BowE ~ Conditionmiddot Lead Content Thresholds Ext = Exterior Playgrd = Playground G = Good Window Wells = 800 ugft2 Soil = 500 parts per million Found = Foundation Equip= Equipment F = Fair Window Sills = 500 ugft2 Paint = 5000 parts per millio
P = Poor Floors = 200 ugft2
1
Pedricktown Army Reserve Base RISK ASSESSMENT
ASSESSOR Eric Whiston
BUILDING NUMBER 278S DATE June 10 1994
UNIT ADDRESS Quarters 132M CONTROL NUMBER 694033
SAMPLES JESTING ABOVE PERMISSIBLE THRESHOLDS ffiJ~114-il~--~ bull ~middot1r 1 rfr11t~f-- 3 ~-~middot tttlj1 -it~~7115~~ middotJ 1~1-~1ltrifJ(jZ bullJl rmiddot9-middot1~_it~~~ttir-m1m middot
Sample
No Type Room Surface Substrate Subst Cond
Wipe Dimensions HK Sample Comments Unit Comments Results
40 w Entry Foyer Floor Concrete F 1200 X 1200 sampled at right of front entry door 8640 ugft2
42 w Kitchen Window Sill Wood F 400 X 2300 p sampled at west window window rcalnted shut paint chips and dirt
g n 892 ugft2
44 w living Room Window Well Wood F 350 X 1200
oaded in well
sampled at north side of east window ltt~ ( di 46663 ugft2
49 s Ext Found 000 X 000 sampled near building foundation 1384 ppm around south half of building_
SAMPLES TESTING BELOW PERMISSIBLE THRESHOLDS rt~~~~iit1 7~ ~ rfL=-~r ~--~middotmiddotmiddot~~_Ci~~JK1 1tplusmnt~~middotmiddot gtt~~~l_J~irtri~rmiddot~=r~it-~it~~ r -~-~J~~-gt~tft~irTJtrri~tif~middot tt iBTih~ Sample Subst Wipe
CondNo Type Room Surface Substrate Dimensions HK Sample Comments Unit Comments Results
41 w Kitchen Floor Vinyl G 1200 X 1200 sampled at rear entry 33 ugft2
43 w Living Room Floor Wood G 1200 X 1200 sampled at entry to south living room lt~lt 14 ugft2
45 w Bedroom 1 Floor Wood G 1200 X 1200 sampled at radiator ~ rmiddotr 20 ugft2
46 w Bedroom 1 Window Well Vinyl G 350 X 2900 sampled at south window 123 ugft2
47 w Bedroom 2 Floor Wood F 1200 X 1200 sampled at entry r-middot bullmiddot ) 13 ugft2
48 w Bedroom 2 Window Well Vinyl G 350 X 2900 sampled at south window 183 ugft2
50 s Ext Yard 000 X 000 sampled around parimeter of building 188 ppm south hal-
Codes ~ ~ condition Lead Content Thresholds Ext = Exterior Playgrd = Playground G = Good Window Wells = 800 ugft2 Soil = 500 parts per million Found = Foundation Equip = Equipment F = Fair Window Sills= 500 ugft2 Paint= 5000 parts per millio
P = Poor Floors = 200 ugft2
Fi
i
53
55
59
61
Pedricktown Army Reserve Base RISK ASSESSMENT
ASSESSOR Eric Whiston
BUILDING NUMBER 277S DATE June 10 1994
UNIT ADDRESS Quarters 132J CONTROL NUMBER 694033
0SAMPLES TESTING ABOVE PERMISSIBLE THRESHOLDS ~1ot~r-~~nr ll1~rir~ ~ bull f~i~ i~1h ~1imiddotf1t~~1Jriit~1 middot--r_rk~1~~hHmiddotH111~ _1(-t M~ l~ Sample Subst Wipe
No Type Room Surface Substrate Cond Dimensions HK Sample Comments Unit Comments Results
W Kitchen Window Well Wood p 400 X 2300 P sampled at west window Original 19745 ugft2 wooden casement window paint chips and dust noted
60 s Ext Found 000 X 000 sampled around unit foundation very 526 ppm few chips some paint chips were noted around porches and basement windows
SAMPLES TESTING BELOW PERMISSIBLE THRESHOLDS ~~~ LfJt t ~ imiddot- -tl~~J j ~_ )i tmiddot1-Jl~(it ~---~~i~iJt~ti v1~middot)rmiddotJftt~~r~i~-l1-1~t~Jf-~~ f~-~~ middot( t)middotmiddot ~--middot~ti~t4 fIt~~~-t1i17_tt~Nr~ -~middot~~
Sample Subst WipeCondNo Type Room Surface Substrate Dimensions HK Sample Comments Unit Comments Results
51 w Entry Foyer Floor Vinyl G 1200 x 1200 G sampled at front entry cmiddotmiddotr --middot 19 ugft2
52 w Kitchen Floor Vinyl G 1200x 1200 G sampled at rear entry -r-- r middot~ ( 3 ugft2
54 w Living Room Floor Woo_d G 1200 x 1200 G sampled at entry to dining room lt_-gt 9 ugft2
w Living Room Window Well Vinyl G 350 X 3400 G sampled at middle window east wall 434 ugft2
_56 w Bedroom 1 Floor Wood G 1200 X 1200 G sampled at entry(hall) room carpeted middotmiddotJrmiddotmiddot 3 ugft2
57 w Bedroom 1 Window Sill Wood G 350 X 2900 G sampled at south window above radiator 70 ugft2
58 w Bedroom 3 Floor Wood G 1200 x 1200 G sampled at entry room carpeted 4 ugft2
w Bedroom 3 Window Well Vinyl G 350 X 2900 G sampled at west window(only) very 28 ugft2 clean
s Ext Yard 000 X 000 sampled around parimeter of unit 239 ppm ground cover was excellent
sample Types ~ ~ condition Lead Content Thresholds Codes W=Wipe Ext = Exterior Playgrd = Playground G = Good Window Wells =800 ugft2 Soil =500 parts per million S= Soil Found = Foundation Equip = Equipment F = Fair Window Sills = 500 ugft2 Paint = 5000 parts per million p = P~int P = Poor Floors = 200 ugft2
71
72
Pedricktown Army Reserve Base RISK ASSESSMENT
ASSESSOR Eric Whiston
BUILDING NUMBER 277N DATE June 9 1994
UNIT ADDRESS Quarters 1321 CONTROL NUMBER 694033
SAMPLES TESTING ABOVE PERMISSIBLE THRESHOLDS 3-ttr7 J _c~~~-t~~~-~_Ar)middotgtltmiddot-11lt~i~ ~=~1i-f_~~r t_-smiddotmiddot~middot-~-- ~~middot J~~t-middot~t1t~~f(i~~~~~ ~i~ tt middottgt ~-u~-~t~ rri-~i-~~~~J(~ilt~~~f~1n~ (~_~1_i~-ilft~-- ~- middot
Sample Subst Wipe No Type Room Surface Substrate Cond Dimensions HK Sample Comments Unit Comments Results
62 w Entry Foyer Floor Vinyl F 1200 X 1200 G sampled at front entry 222 ugft2
64 w Kitchen Window Well Wood p 400 X 2300 p samcfced at west window original wood (~ 7 middotmiddot --middot _) - 87261 ugft2 win ow eaint chles and dusVdirt noted
s Ext Found 000 X 000 sampled around perimeter of unit 685 ppm foundation
73 s Ext Found 000 X 000 sampled aroun_d garage 287 686 ppm foundation bull middot
SAMPLES TESTING BELOW PERMISSIBLE THRESHOLDS ifmiddott-rit ~t fRittii(bull 1 ~~~( ~1t gtlh~1r tl4 fa~~~ bull4lt-~t~i1brr1t~ff~1~$khmiddot~i_~fhi~1~t~middotilmiddott ~~ ~n Ji~~~~ t - ~A1J~t~ ~i Sample Subst Wipe
Substrate CondNo Type Room Surface Dimensions HK Sample Commen-5 Unit Comments Results
63 w Kitchen Floor Vinyl G 1200 X 1200 G sampled at re~rentry 57 ugft2
65 w living Room Floor Wood G 1200 X 1200 G sampled at en~ry to middotdining room 33 ugft2
66 w living Room Window Well Vinyl G 350 X 3500 sampled at east window dirt but no 516 ugft2 eaint chips noted
67 w Bedroom 1 Floor Wood G 1200 X 1200 G sampled at entry lt~r 15 ugft2
68 w Bedroom 1 Window Sill Wood G 300 X 3350 G sampled at window (only) ~middot 6 32 ugft2
69 w Bedroom 2 Floor Woodmiddot G 1200 x 1200 G sampled at entry 32 ugft2
70 w Bedroom 2 Window Well Vinyl G 350 X 2800 sampled at west window _Jr(~ 413 ugft2
s Ext Yard 000 X 000 sampled around building perimeter 399 ppm
74 s Ext Yard 000 X 000 samfed around perimeter of garage 356 ppm 28
75 w BLANK 000 X 000 QAQC spike sample number 159 331 ugft2
sample Typesmiddot ~ ~ Condition Lead Content Thresholds ~Codes w =Wipe Ext= Exterior Playgrd = Playground G = Good Window Wells = 800 ugft2 Soil = 500 parts per million s = Soil Found = Foundation Equip = Equipment F = Fair Window Sills =500 ugft2 Paint =5000 parts per millio p = Paint P = Poor Floors = 200 ugft2
78
83
87
~
Pedricktown Army Reserve Base RISK ASSESSMENT
ASSESSOR Eric Whiston
BUILDING NUMBER 276S DATE June 9 1994
UNIT ADDRESS Quarters 132H CONTROL NUMBER 694033
SAMPLES TESTING ABOVE PERMISSIBLE THRESHOLDS ~~i~~~~f~rJE ll ~ F1e ~middot~ tbulltir~rmiddotA ~lfl~i~iiimiddot~middotr~imiddot ~middoti~btfl~ middot i~1 KlmRrilampiff11ili Sample Subst Wipe
CondNo Type Room Surface Substrate Dimensions HK Sample Comments Unit Comments Results
w Kitchen Window Well Wood p 350 X 2300 p sampled at west window original 137694 ugft2 wooden window paint chips and dusVdirt noted
w Bedroom 3 Floor Wood G 1200 x 1200 G sampled at radiator 417 ugft2
1SAMPLES TESTING BELOW PERMISSIBLE THRESHOLDS s - ~--~ -~~-~rmiddot middotmiddot ~-~middot ttif ~ k~middot-r~t-~-~imiddot gt~~middottmiddotmiddotgt-~~-f t--~-t ~ ~-~ ~ f 1~gt~-tmiddot~r~Li~~ ry~~1)it~ftmiddotrmiddot~ltit-
Sample Subst WipeCondNo Type Room Surface Sub~trate Dimensions HK Sample Comments Unit Comments Results
76 w BLANK 000 X 000 field blank 5 ugft2
77 w Kitchen Floor Vinyl G 1200 x 1200 G sampled at rear entry 3 ugft2
79 w Living Room Floor Wood G 1200 X 1200 G sampled at entry to dining room 1 ugft2
80 w Living Room Window Well Vinyl G 350 X 3600 G sampled at middle window east wall 195 ugft2
81 w Bedroom 2 Floor Wood G 1200 x 1200 G sampled at entry 3 ugft2
82 w Bedroom 2 Window Sill Wood F 300 X 3350 G sampled from west window 1 ugft2
84 w Bedroom 3 Window Well Vinylmiddot G 350 X 3000 sampled at east window 524 ugft2
85 s Ext Found 000 X 000 sampled around building foundation 493 ppm paint chips noted In areas around eorches dralneiees and windows
86 s Ext Yard 000 X 000 sampled around building parimeter 194 ppm
w Entry Foyer Floor Concrete F 1200 x 1200 G sampled at front entry 125 ugft2
88 s Ext Found 000 X 000 sampled around garage 286 454 ppm foundation paint chips from door and window noted in soil and on pavement
89 s Ext Yard 000 X 000 sampled around perimeter of garage 133 ppm 286
Sample Types fiQQJE ~ Conditionmiddot Lead Content ThresholdsCodes W=Wipe middotbullmiddotmiddotExt = Exterior Playgrd = Playground G = Good Window Wells =800 ugft2 Soil =500 parts per million s = Soil Found = Foundation Equip = Equipment F = Fair Window Sills = 500 ugft2 Paint = 5000 parts per millio p = Paint P = Poor Floors = 200 ugft2
i
~ _
Pedricktown Army Reserve Base RISK ASSESSMENT
ASSESSOR Eric Whiston
BUILDING NUMBER 276N middotmiddotmiddot( DATE June 8 1994
UNIT ADDRESS Quarters 132G CONTROL NUMBER 694033
SAMPLES TESTING ABOVE PERMISSIBLE THRESHOLDS fl ~+~i]~ltrf1J ~~1-imiddot f tttf~bull11~-u~~~(f~J-~deg) _ ribullJZtft- ~i1~i~~fi)t ~I triOJ o4i i~ ~~t-~11~+~j~~ ofIG~~~ti-~ ~i ~ -
Sample Subst WipeCondNo Type Room Surface Substrate Dimensions HK Sample Comments Unit Comments Results
94 w Living Room Window Well Vinyl G 350 X 1300 sampled at east window south end 1 155 ugft2
101 w Entry Foyer Floor Vinylmiddot G 1200 X 1200 sampled at front entry 485 ugft2
SAMPLES TESTING BELOW PERMISSIBLE THRESHOLDS ~ii~(t91~ 1~i11~~ t v~ ~( middot-- ~t~l~tr~Jlti 11)_i~ Y~ttltx ~~~All~~ l 1 t~~~~rampii~~~~~tyJ~it~t~M~l~middottbullbullt-1i -- ~ r ~~~
Sample Subst WipeCondNo Type Room Surface Substrate Dimensions HK Sample Comments Unit Comments Results
90 w BLANK 000 X 000 field blank 5 ugft2
91 w Kitchen Floor Vinyl G 1200 X 1200 sampled at re(lr-entry 14 ugft2
92 w Kitchen Window Sill Wood F 350 X 2400 sampled at west window original wooden casement _type paint chips and
29 ugft2
dirt accumulated in well
93 w Living Room Floor Wood G 1200 X 1200 sampled unde(~ast window south of raditator middot
1o ugft2
95 w Bedroom 1 Floor Woodmiddot G 1200 X 1200 sampled at entry 1 ugft2
96 w Bedroom 1 WindowWe11 Vinyl G 350 X 2900 sampled at w~st window a few paint 35 ugft2 chies noted In well
97 w Bedroom 2 Floor Wood G 1200 X 1200 sampled at nJrth window 18 ugft2
98
99
100
w s
s
Bedroom 2
Ext Found
Ext Yard
Window Well Vinyl G 350 X 2900
000 X 000
Q00 X 000
sampled at no~h window
sampled around rerimeter of unit foundation pafn chips noted from eorches and trio sampled aroun~perimeter of building
119 ugft2
destroyed
1~6 ppm
middot
Sample Typesmiddot 8QQID ~ Conditionmiddot Lead Content Thresholds Codes w=Wipe Ext = Exterior Playgrd = Playground G = Good Window Wells = 800 ugft2 Soil = 500 parts per million s = Soil Found = Foundation Equip = Equipment F = Fair Window Sills = 500 ugft2 Paint = 5000 parts per million
p = Paint P = Poor Floors = 200 ugft2
V
I
bull middotbullI
Pedricktown Army Reserye Base RISK ASSESSMENT
ASSESSOR Eric Whiston
BUILDING NUMBER 177S DATE June 8 1994
UNIT ADDRESS Quarters 132E CONTROL NUMBER 694033
middotbulll SAMPLES TESTING ABOVE PERMISSIBLE THRESHOLDS ~J~f~~jjlf2~~1ltTt~ middotl~~J- 1~imiddot-- 1middot-i7-ltif Jti~~ft~~middot _rli~middot f~lt-ii1i1~--~1_~r1~ ~ - -middot ~middot middot -~ ~ fi~t~~= ti-flimiddot~imiddott--yenJfsi(plusmn-~~-i~~~--r3
Sample Subst Wipe CondNo Typo Room Surface Substrate Dimensions HK Sample Com~ents Unit Comments Results
1111 s Ext Found 000 X 000 sampled aro11nd perimeter of unit fair 709 ppm cover paint chips around doors windows and front and rear porches
1112 s Ext Found 000 X 000 sampted aroun~ garage 197 640 ppm
1SAMPLES TESTING BELOW PERMISSIBLE THRESHOLDS m- ~$i lrFt t n~r~~middot~imiddot bullmiddot~ 1J bull tii~11~--~middot1rbull~1i-4f_~~-1-tWJmiddot ~~it~Afi ~~~ ff middot~1middot middotrmiddot ~~~5~1 Sample Subst Wipe
CondNo Type Room Surface Substrate Dimensions HK Sample Co~ments Unit Comments Results
102 w Kitchen Floor Vinyl G 1200 X 1200 G sampled at re~r -~ntry 5 ugft2
103 w Kitchen Window Sill Wood G 600 X 2800 G sampled at thewest window north side 15 ugft2
104 w living Room Floor Wood G 1200 X 1200 G sampled at st~lrs 1 ugft2
105 w living Room Window Well Vinyl G 350 X 3600 G sampled a eastwindow 299 ugft2
106 w Bedroom 1 Floor Wood G 1200 x 1200 G sampled at e~tty 5 ugft2
107 w Bedroom 1 Window Well Vinyl G 350 X 3000 G sampled in eastwindow paint chips 314 ugft2 noted in well few
108 w Bedroom 2 Floor Wood G 1200 X 1200 G sampled at S)Ulh-YJindow 21 ugft2
109 w Bedroom 2 Window Well Vinyl G 350 X 3000 sampled at sooth window 78 ugft2
110 w 000 X 000 not submitted to lab
112 s Ext Yard 000 X 000 sampled atouhd perimeter of unit good 115 ppm cover
middotbull
8QQfilCodes ~ Conditionmiddot Lead Content Thresholds Ext = Exterior Playgrd = Playground G = Good Window Wells = 800 ugft2 Soil = 500 parts per million Found c Foundation Equip = Equipment F = Fair Window Sills = 500 ugft2 Pant = 5000 parts per millio
P = Poor Floors = 200 ugft2
i
Ibullrmiddot I w~ bullmiddotmiddot
Pedricktown Army Reserve Base RISK ASSESSMENT
ASSESSOR Eric Whiston
BUILDING NUMBER 177N DATE June 7 1994
UNIT ADDRESS Quarters 132D CONTROL NUMBER 694033
SAMPLES TESTING ABOVE PERMISSIBLE THRESHOLDS t(~-~i~middot~~rl~ J-~JfJf 1 ~it I~~ lt lt ~bull t~h~~t ibullt ~j4 ltrr l~ ~1 (11it 0~7J~tl~ i11~~i-UI nlt Is -1r~~k~~-~ tfa 14[lif~-~1raquo- f ~l~Cfha
Sample
No Type Room Surface Substrate Subst Cond
Wipe Dimensions HK Sample Comrhents Unit Comments Results
115 w Kitchen Floor Vinyl G 1200 X 1200 G sampled at re~r entry 255 ugft2
123 s Ext Found 000 X 000 sampled around perimeter of unit 897 ppm foundation cover fair to eoor
SAMPLES TESTING BELOW PERMISSIBLE THRESHOLDS zt~yenit~ ~-tJ middot~1middot_tr r i1~e_~raquo fcddegCif~ffit~f~3r~~~ii11~-~~tli_~ r _bull~~imiddot1i~11x1~1~fbull - ~ ~~~ Sample Subst Wipe
CondNo Type Room Surface Substrate Dimensions HK Sample Com~ents Unit Comments Results
113 w BLANK 000 X 000 field blank 7 ugft2
114 w Entry Foyer Floor Wood G 1200 x 1200 G sampled at front _entry 51 ugft2
116 w Kitchen Window Well Vinyl G 350 X 2400 G sampled at we~t window north side 24 ugft2
117 w Living Room Floor Wood G 1200 X 1200 G sampled at northeast window 35 ugft2
118 w living Room Window Well Vinyl G 350 X 3600 G sampled at north wall east end 430 ugft2
119 w Bedroom 1 Floor Wood G 1200 X 1200 G sampled at entry 11 ugft2
120 w Bedroom 1 Window Well Vinyl G 350 X 3100 G sampled at west window north side 137 ugft2
121 w Bedroom 2 Window Sill Vinyl G 300 X 3300 G sampled at north window 99 ugft2
122 w Bedroom 2 Floor Wood G 1200 x 1200 G sampled at radiator on north side 46 ugft2
124 s Ext Yard 000 X 000 sampled around perimeter of unit 172 ppm cover oood
Codes ~ ~ Conditionmiddot Lead Content Thresholds Ext = Exterior Playgrd = Playground G = Good Window Wells =800 ugft2 Soil =500 parts per million Found = Foundation Equip = Equipment F = Fair Window Sills = 500 ugft2 Paint = 5000 parts per millio
P = Poor Floors = 200 ugft2
i
Pedricktown Army Reserve Base RISK ASSESSMENT
BUILDING NUMBER 179
UNIT ADDRESS Quarters 132C
ASSESSOR Eric Whiston
DATE June 6 1994
CONTROL NUMBER 694033
SAMPLES TESTING ABOVE PERMISSIBLE THRESHOLDS mIKntr~~ Sample Subst Wipe
No Type Room Surface Substrate Cond Dimensions HK Sample Co~ments
~1t~J11middot tlt11 ~F~~1ampr~~~~~ti ~r1t~~ JrJ~1t~1 1 1- ~~~1iFk6t~~1~r~J~~h~ 1~
Unit Comments
1~l1 r
Results
1
126 w Kitchen Floor Vinyl G 1200 x 1200 G sampledmiddotat rearentry 1072 ugft2
129 w Living Room Window Well Vinyl G 350 X 2700 G sampled at n~rth window 1391 ugft2
134 s Ext Found 000 X 000 sampled around the perimeter of the unit foundation
672 ppm
136 w Entry Foyer Floor Woodmiddot G 1200 x 1200 G sampled at unit entry 381 ugft2
SAMPLES TESTING BELOW PEgMISSIBLE THRESHOLDS ) fi bullbull fcJ)7if~ rmiddot- bull[ bulli~~i-yen~~~~11 ~ltfr~ 0I tlt-~tccent1fyrfl-il4 Ji iibull-sJ1 4ji_~J~~cr~r(f~~ middotL~~11 Sample Subst Wipe
CondNo Type Room Surface Substrate Dimensions HK Sample Comrne~ts Unit Comments Results
125 w BLANK 000 X 000 field blank 7 ugft2
127 w Kitchen Window Well Vinyl G 350 X 3200 G sampled at we~t ~indow north of door 400 ugft2
128 w Living Room Floor Wood G 1200 X 1200 G sampled under south window 47 ugft2
130 w Bedroom 1 Floor Wood G 1200 X 1200 G sampled at radiator on north wall 10 ugft2
131 w Bedroom 1 Window Sill Wood F 300 X 3100 G sampled at nltrtli window 70 ugft2
132 w Bedroom 2 Floor Wood G 1200x 1200 G sampled at entry 13 ugft2
133 w Bedroom 2 Window Well Vinyl G 350 X 2700 G sampled at north window 194 ugft2
135 s Ext Yard 000 X 000 sampled around the perimeter of the 193 ppm unit
137 s Ext Found 000 X 000 sampled aroundthe foundation of the 323 ppm ara~e 188
138 s Ext Yard 000 X 000 sampled around the perimeter of the 173 ppm _garage 188 middot
Sample Typesmiddot ~ ~ Conditionmiddot Lead Content ThresholdsCodes W=Wipe Ext = Exterior Paygrd = Playground G = Good Window Wells = 800 ugft2 Soil = 500 parts per million S=Soil Found =Foundation Equip = Equipment F = Fair Window Sills= 500 ugft2 Paint= 5000 parts per million p = Paint P = Poor Floors = 200 ugft2
- - - - - -------- -middot-middot------middot-middot-middot------- - middot- - --- -- - - - - -
I
f
Pedricktown Army Reserve Base
BUILDING NUMBER
UNIT ADDRESS Playground Area
SAMPLES TESTING BELOW PERMISSIBLE THRESHOLDS ~-~rr )1poundit~]Jii~~ ttit~tif~~~j~f l~r~~1Ji1-_ygJ~tif middot~~
Sample Subst WipeCondNo Type Room Surfacemiddot Substrate Dimensions HK Sample Comments
RISK ASSESSMENT
ASSESSOR Eric Whiston
DATE June 6 1994
CONTROL NUMBER 694033
~yen~ lj-~t11)i~I~~ ~ ~~ -~1~1r~~~~it t~ )~~1 lpound(j~--~~1 l~t1 ~gt-~~middot-~~~~C~pound-~1ir~5tt t~~J~~~tr ~
Unit Comments Results
139 s Playground 000 X 000 collected at and around play ground 247 ppm egulpment In amiddotreas of exposed dirt
140 s Playground 000 X 000 collected at andaround play ground 365 ppm eguiement in areas of exposed dirt
Codes BQQm -~ conditioff Lead Content Thresholds Ext = Exterior Playgrd = Playground G = Good Window Wells = 800 ugft2 Soil = 500 parts per million Found = Foundation Equip = Equipment F = Fair Window Sills = 500 ugft2 Paint = 5000 parts per millio
P = Poor Floors = 200 ugft2 middot
APPENDIXB
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS -
HousingLEAD ANALYSIS EnvironmentalREPORTmiddotHES Services Inc
Page 1 Received
REPORT TO
ATTEN
CLIENT COMPANY
FACILITY
Aziauth Inc REPORT York Order 94-06-243 062094 062794 172713
Housing Environmental Svc Inc PREPARED Azimuth Inc ~ ~ 130 Bishop Allen Drive BY 9229 University Blvd A~~~ Cambridge HA 02139 Charleston SC 29406 ~ Q
~~A7owaY Hatt Mahoney ATTEN Laboratory Services
PHONE CONTACT _P~A~IG=E________
~H=E~S---~ SAMPLES 56 Housing Environmental Svc Inc
Director of Laboratories Richard D Bennett MSPH CIH
UORK ID HES Control 694033 AIHA Lab No 367 NY State ELAP Lab No 11052 TAKEN SC DHEC Lab No 10121 Env Lead ELLAP Lab No 29250-001
NVLAP Lab No 1050 CDCOSHA Blood Lead Lab No 04-094TRANS ~UP=S------------shyTYPE I~H-------------
p 0 --------------INVOICE Attached
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION TEST CODES and NANES used on this workorder Q1 __1____________ HUDPBU HUD Lead Uipe 02 _2____________
03 _______________3 04 _4____________ Q2 __s____________ Qsect_ _6____________
07 7_____________
08 =8____________
09 __9____________ 1Q __1__o____________ 11middot 1=3_____________ 1l __1__4______________
ll 1s____________ li 16______________
ll _11_middot-----------li 18______________
1L _1_9____________ ll _2=0____________ 12 _2__1____________ ~- _26____________
ll _27____________ 22 82_____________
23 29____________ ~ 30____________ 2smiddot31____________ 26 _3__2____________
PLEASE CALL 1-617-876-3333 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THIS REPORT
HousingLEAD ANALYSIS EnvironmentalREPORTHES Services Inc
Page 2 Aziauth Inc REPORT Uork Order 94-06-243 Received 062094
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION 27 _33____________
28 34_________ 29 35__________
30 40=------------ll ______________41
32 42____________
33 43=------------34 ______________44
~ 45___________ 36 _______________46
37 ______________4 7
38 ____________48
39 ______________51 ~ __ _5 2 ___________
il __ _______53__ _ il_ _54____________ 43 __________________55 44 ___________56 _
il __57_________
i2 _5a__________ 47 ______________59
48 ______________62
49 _63__________ 2Q ___________64 _
ll __ ________65__ _ 21_ _______________66
a _61_________ 54 _68_________
22middot _69_________ 22 _10___________
062794 172713
PLEASE CALL 1-617-876-3333 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THIS REPORT
27-Jun-34 AZIMUTH LABORATORIES
PAGE 1
Order 9406243 HES Control 694033
Laboratory Results HUD Lead Wipe Analytical Method Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
by modifi~d NIOSH 7082
Sample Description Amount Cug) Area (ft2) Result (ugft2)
-c-6243-1 middotmiddot J 1 000 middot(25 v6243-2 3587 1 00(gt 3587
6243-3 262 0563 465 I6243-4 2514 050(gt 5028
6243-5 1142 1 000 1142
6243-6 90350 0583 154835 6243-7 787 1000 787 V6243-8 213250 0361 530557
6243-3 435 1 000 435 j6243-10 272250 0361 753346
~243-13 12060 1000 middot12060 I 6243-14 618 1 000 middot5f9 V
6243-15 726 1 406 516 i
6243-16 1873 1 000 1873 6243-17 25250 0500 50500
6243-18 12475 1 000 12475 I6243-19 1278 0472 27(gt8 6243-20 1764 1 lt)00 1764 VJ 6243-21 68350 0500 136700 Ilt-c-__J6243-26 1 000 lt25 6243-27 75 1000 75 j 6243-28 23125 0 633 45586 I6243-29 1621 1000 1621 I6243-30 27 1 000 27
I6243-31 1032 0813 1270 lt -c-6243-32 lt25 1 000 J V
6243-33 33 0~705 46 I6243-34 111 1 000 111
6243-35 lt25 0705 lt35 j
I6243-40 8640 1 000 8640 I6243-41 33 1 ~ 000 middot 33 J6243-42 570 o 63t 831 middot6243-43 (25 1 000 lt25 J 6243-44 13610 0292 46658 l
)6243-45 lt25 1 000 lt25 6243-46 87 0705 123 J
6243-47 middotlt25 1 000 middotlt25 )
J6243-48 123 0705 183 J6243-51 lt25 1 000 lt25
6243-52 ltbullbull bullc-lt25 1000 J _1
6243-53 12615 o 633 13745 J 6243-54 lt-C 1J 1000 -=25
6243-55 359 0826 434 -c- _ -c-6243-56 J 1 000 bullbull 4J
27-Jun-middot34 AZIMUTH LABORATORIES
PAGE -
6243-57 43 0705 70 J
6243-58 ( -C rooo lt25 6243-53 lt r- - 0705 lt35 _
6243-62 - ~pound_ 1 000 222 V
6243-63 57 1 000 57 6243-64 6243-65 6243-66
55750 33
439
0639 1 000 omiddot 851
87259 33
516
I I
Vi
)
6243-67 lt25 1000 lt~25 6243-68 6243-63
lt25 bull-
o 638 1 000
lt36 )wL
v
J
6243-70 281 0681 412 v
HousingLEAD ANALYSIS EnvironmentalREPORTHES Services Inc
Page 1 Aziauth Inc REPORT Mork Orderbull 94-06-244 Received 062094 062894 170702
REPORT Housing Environmental Svc Inc PREPARED Azimuth Inc TO 130 Bishop Allen Drive BY 9229 University Blvd
Cambridge MA 02139 Charleston SC 29406
ATTEN Matt Mahoney ATTEN Laboratory Services PHONE CONTACT _P_A_IG_E_____
CLIENT ~HESa------ SAMPLES 56 COMPANY Housing Environmental Svc Inc
FACILITY Director of Laboratories Richard D Bennett MSPH CIH
WORK ID HES Control 694033 AIHA Lab No 367 NY State ELAP Lab No 11052 TAKEN SC DHEC Lab No 10121 Env Lead ELLAP Lab No 29250-001 TRANS __ s ________________________ _ u_P__ NVLAP Lab No 1050 cocmiddotosHA Blood Lead Lab No 04-094
TYPE _I_H__________________________
PO
INVOICE Attached
middotsAMPLE IDENTIFICATION TEST CODES and NANES used on this workorder Q1 __7 __5_______________________ HUDPB~ HUD Lead Wipe Q1 __7__6_______________________
03 1_______________________1 04 __7__8_______________________ ~ 7 9______________ 06 __s__o_______________ 0 7 ____8 1__________________
~ __8__2___________________
09 83____________________ 1Q ________________8 4
11 ________________________87
ll _9_0_____________ rr 9 1________________
li __9__2________~------li _9______________________3
li __ _____________________9_4 1Z _9__5_____________________ 1sect _9______________________6 12 _9__7________________
20 _9__8_________________
ll 10__1______~--------
~ 102 23 _1_03___________________ li_ ____ ___________________ 04_
~ 0 5 ----------------1____2 6 __1__06_____________________
PLEASE CALL 1-617-876-3333 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THIS REPORT
HousingLEAD ANALYSIS EnvironmentalREPORTHES Services Inc
Page 2 Aziauth Inc REPORT York Orderbull 94-06-244 Received 062094 062894 170702
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION 27 107 28 108
~ 109 30 113
ll 114
R 115 33 116 34 117 35 118
li 119 37 120 38 121 39 122 40 125 il middot126
42- 127 43 128middot middot middotmiddot 44 --12=-9_________
il_ 130 46 --131___________
47 132 48 ____13 __________3
49 ____13 ___________~6 50 __ ___________ 41
ll 142 21_ 143
21 144
li 145
22middot 146 56 147
PLEASE CALL 1-617-876-3333 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THIS REPORT
27-Jun-94 AZIMUTH LABORATORIES
PAGE l
ORDER 9406244 HES CONTROL 694033
Laboratorv Results HUD Lead Wipe _ Analytical Method Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
by modified NIOSH 7082
Sample Description Amount (ug) Area (ft2) Result (ugft2) ------------------------------------------------------------------~ 6244--75 331 1 331 6244-76 lt25 1 624-4-77 (25 1 lt25 6241l-78 76975 0559 137701 6244-79 lt25 1 (25 6244-80 171 0875 195 6244--81 lt25 1 lt25 6244-82 lt25 Cgt698 ~~36 6244_93 417 -1 middot _417-6244--84 middot392 o--1~9middot ~24 6244-87 125 1 125 6244-90 lt25 1 (25 6244-91 lt25 1 lt25 6244-92 lt25 0583 middot(43 6244-93 middot(25 1 lt25 6244-94 365 0316 1153 6244-95 lt25 1 lt25 6244-96 25 0705 35 6244-97 lt25 1 25 6244-98 84 0705 118 6244-101 485 1 485 6244-102 1 6244-103 lt25 117 lt21 6244-104 lt25 1 6244-105 262 0875 middotmiddot299 6244-106 1 middot(25 6244-107 229 0729 314 6244-108 lt25 1 lt25 6244-109 57 0~729 78 6244-113 1 lt25 6244-114 51 middot1 51 6244-115 255 1 255 6244-116 lt25 0583 lt43 6244-117 __-C 1 35 6244-118 376 0875 429 6244-119 lt25 1 lt25 6244-120 103 0753 136 6244-121 68 0688 99 6244-122 46 1 46 6244-125 lt25 1 lt25 6244-126 1072 1 1072 6244-127 311 0778 3clt7 6244-128 47 1 47
27-Jun-94 AZIMUTH LABORAtORIES
PAGE 2
ORDER 9406244 HES CONTROL 694033
Laboratory Results HUD Lead llJi pe Analytical Method Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
by modified NIOSH 7082
Sample Description Amount ( ug ) Area (ft2) Result (ugft2)
6244-129 913 0656 1391 6244-130 lt25 1 lt25 6244-131 45 0646 69 6244-132 lt25 1 lt25 6244-133 127 0656 193 6244-136 381 1 381middot ~244--141 lt25- lt25t bull
6244_f42 lt~ ) Cbull middotL09
middotbulllt23 bullmiddot middot~ bull
6244_143 108 1 iOB 6244-144 lt25 0938 -27 6244-14-5 1338 0938 1426 6244-146 147 1 147 6244-147 lt25 1 25
HousingLEAD ANALYSIS EnvironmentalREPORTHES Services Inc
Page 1 Aziauth Received 062094
REPORT TO
Housing Environmental Svc 130 Bishop Allen Drive Cambridge HA 02139
Inc
ATTEN Hatt Mahoney
CLIENT COMPANY
~H~E=-S_____ SAMPLES Housing Environmental Svc
il Inc
FACILITY---------------
WORK ID HES Control 694033
Inc REPORT York Orderbull 94-06-242 062894 095855
PREPARED Azimuth Inc
BY 9229 University Blvd ~~ Charleston SC 29406~r-~-------- APROVEDB
ATTEN Laboratory Services PHONE CONTACT ~P~A__IG=E=-----
micro11Director of Laborator1es
Richard D Bennett HSPH CIH
AIHA Lab No 367 NY State ELAP Lab No 11052 SC DHEC Lab No 10121 Env Lead ELLAP Lab No 29250middot001TAKEN---------------------------
TRANS U~P~S------------------------shy NVLAP Lab No 1050 CDCOSHA Blood Lead Lab No 04middot094
TYPE ~I=H--------------------------
PO ---------------------------INV~IC~ Attached
SAMPLE IDilTIFICATION TEST CODES and NAMES used on this wortorde~ Q1 __1__48_____________ HUDPBS HUD Lead In Soil 0 2
03 1__49____________ 1=-5o___________
HUDPBU HUD Lead Uipe
04 1=-51-=------------ll 11___________
06 1aa2___________ 07 =2=2___________ 08 _23___________ 09 _24___________ 1Q =2__5___________ ll 3~6___________
li 37___________ ll _3__8___________
li _39___________ J2 49___________ li _5o___________
ll _60___________ li _61___________ 12 71___________ 20 72___________ il 7__3___________
il 74___________ 23 85___________
24 8aa6___________ ll_ _8__8___________
26 89___________
PLEASE CALL 1-617-876-3333 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THIS REPORT
HousingLEAD ANALYSIS EnvironmentalREPORTHES Services Inc
Page 2 Aziauth Inc REPORT ~ork Orderbull 94-06-242
Received 062094 062894 095855
SAMPLE IDEMTIFICATIOM 27 100_________ 28 111_________
29 1118 30 112 ll 123 32 124 33 134 34 135 ~ 137 36 138 37 139 38 140 39 152 iQ 153 il 154
PLEASE CALL 1-617-876-3333 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THIS REPORT
I -Jun-middot14 AZIMUTH LABORATORIES tPibt J
Order 9406242 HES Control 694033
TEST RESULTS BY TEST
HUD Lead in Soil Analytical Method Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
by modified NIOSH 7082
Sample Description Reslllt Unimiddotts
6242-11 23073 i By Weight 6242-12 00521 i By Weight 6242-22 1 1522 i By Weight 6242-23 Cgt0608 i By Weight 6242-24 01873 i By Weight 6242-25 00252 i By Weight 6242-36 00459 i By Weight 6242-37 00228 i By Weight 6242-38 00483 i By Weight 6242-39 00256 7 By Weight 6242-43 -0~ 1384 By Weight 6242-50 00188 By Weight 6242-60 o 0526middot t By Weight 6242-61 o 0233 i _By wemiddotight 6242-71 00685 By Weight 6242-72 o 0333 i By Weight 6242-73 00686 i By Weight 6242-74 00356 i By Weight 6242-85 6242-86 6242-88
00433 0 01 34 00454
i By Weight 7 By Weight By Weight
6242-89 00133 i By Weight 6242-100 00146 By Weight 6242-111 o 0703 i By Weight
6242-111B 00640 i By Weight 6242-112 00115 i By Weight 6242-123 6242-124 6242-134 6242-135 6242-137 6242-138 6242-139 6242-140 6242-152 6242-153 6242-154
00897 00172 00672 00193 00323 00173 00247 00365 02640 00491 00354
i By Weight i By Weight By Weight i By Weight i By Weight r By Weight i- By Weight r By Weight i By Weight i By Weight i By Weight
SAMPLES FD-15 AND 132 G-10 WERE NOT RECEIVED
TWO SAMPLES WERE RECEIVED LABELED 132E-10 THEY WERE RELABELEDAS 111 AND 1118
27-Jun-94
ORDER 9406242 HES CONTROL 694033
AZIMUTH LABORATORIES PtGE 1
HUD Lead lgtJi pe Analytical Method
Laboratory Results
Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry by mod~~ed NIOSH 7082
Sample Description Amount (ug) Area Cft2) Result Cugft2)
6242-148 6242~-149
6242-150 6242-151
72 9178 2795
221
100 1 ~00 094 100
72 918 2973
21
- Structure Bookmarks
-
- LEAD-BASED PAINT RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT
- FOR
- PEDRICKTOWN ARMY RESERVE BASE BUILDING NOS 120 177 179 276 277 278 QUARTERS NOS 120N 120S 132C 132D 132E 132G 132H 1321 132J 132L 132M PEDRICKTOWN NJ
- Prepared for
-
- Prepared for
- Department of the Army US Garrison Fort Dix Fort Dix NJ 08640-5505 Attn AFZT-EHP (Mr Buerster)
-
- Prepared by
-
- Prepared by
- Ogden Environmental and Energy Services Co Inc 1777 Sentry Parkway West Abington Hall Suite 300 Blue Bell PA 19422 (215) 654-1620
- July 28 1994
- 03-200-013
-
- TABLE OF CONTENTS
-
- TABLE OF CONTENTS
- SECTION 10 INTRODUCTION
- 11
-
- 11
-
- 11
- Scope
-
- 12
-
- 12
- Purpose
-
- 13
-
- 13
- General
-
- SECTION 20 GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
- 21 Building Information
- 22 Areas Tested
- SECTION 30 METHODOLOGY
- 31 Field Survey Methods
- 32 Laboratory Testing Program
- SECTION 40 ASSESSMENT RESULTS
- 41 General Assessment of Conditions
- 42 Previous LBP Abatement Modernization or Extraordinary Maintenance
- 43 Management and Maintenance Staffing
- 44 Painting Policy and Preventive Maintenance
- 45 Worker Training and Protection
- SECTION 50 CONCLUSIONS amp RECOMMENDATIONS
- 51 Conclusions
- 52 Recommendations
- 521 Recommendations for Building No 120
-
- 521 Recommendations for Building No 120
- 522 Recommendations for Building Nos 177 179 276 277 278
- FIGURES
- Figure 1 First Floor
- APPENDICES
- A Field Sample Collection Sheets
- B Laboratory Test Results
-
- 10 INTRODUCTION
-
- 10 INTRODUCTION
- On June 6 through June 14 1994 Ogden conducted a Lead-Based Paint Risk Assessment survey for the following buildings located on the Pedricktown Army Reserve Base Pedricktown NJ Building numbers -120 179 177N 177S 276N 276S 277N 277S 278N 278S This assessment included garages associated with each building This risk assessment survey was conducted for the Department of the Army US Garrison Fort Dix Fort Dix NJ The work was performed under contract number DAC61-93-D-0008 Work Order No 1
-
- 11 SCOPE
-
- 11 SCOPE
- The scope of services provided and the technical procedures employed in this Lead-Based Paint Risk Assessment were conducted in accordance with the general requirements set forth in the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Lead Based Paint (LBP) Policy and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Lead Based Paint Risk Assessment Protocol dated September 1992 The work was also performed in accordance with the OSHA Standard CFR 19101025 Any subsequent revisions to these guidelines may require
- The scope of the Lead-Based Paint Risk Assessment included an assessment of painted and varnished surfaces performance of field inspections and environmental sample collection laboratory analysis and preparation of a report detailing where and at what concentrations lead in household dust and lead in soil were found
-
- 12 PURPOSE
-
- 12 PURPOSE
- The purpose of the Lead-Based Paint Risk Assessment was to evaluate current Army policies employed at the Pedricktown Army Reserve Base regarding the ability to contain and minimize potential lead based paint exposure hazards in residential buildings to inspect and assess existing conditions by the collection of dust wipe and soil samples in accordance with the protocols identified above and to make recommendations for the remediation and management of identified hazards
-
- 13 GENERAL
-
- 13 GENERAL
- No previous surveys were noted during the preparation of this report The findings of this report have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted practice of the Lead-Based Paint Testing and Abatement industry
- The observations and test results presented in this report are time dependent and conditions may change The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based upon the observations and test results obtained in the field and information provided by Base personnel
- and residents during the field survey If any deviations from the conditions noted are encountered during abatement operations they could change the recommendations contained within this report and should be brought to the attention of Ogden
- This report has been prepared for the use of the Department of the Army for the specific application to the Residential Quarters of the Pedricictown Army Reserve Base Pedricktown NJ
- 20 GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
-
- 20 GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
- 21 BUILDING INFORMATION
- This risk assessment included the assessment of the following buildings 120 177 179 276 277 and 278 Building 120 was constructed in 1918 middotand consists of a concrete foundation with a wood frame and wood siding Buildings 177 179 276 277 and 278 were constructed in 1939-1940 These buildings all consist of a concrete and brick foundation with brick exterior walls All of the buildings contain windows made of vinyl casement or wood wooden entry doors and wood trim The roofs are pitched with a wo
- Building Number
-
- Building Number
-
- Building Number
- Quarter Number
-
- 120
-
- 120
- Quarters 120 N 120 S
-
- 177
-
- 177
- Quarters 131 I 132 J
-
- 179
-
- 179
- Quarters 132 C
-
- 276
-
- 276
- Quarters 132 G 132 H
-
- 277
-
- 277
- Quarters 132 I 132 J
-
- 278
-
- 278
- Quarters 132 L 132 M
-
- The buildings have a first floor second floor and a basement
-
- 22 AREAS TESTED
-
- 22 AREAS TESTED
- All above referenced buildings was inspected and assessed in accordance with the protocols established in the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Policy and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Lead-Based Paint Risk Assessment Protocol dated September 1992
- The testing included the collection of soil samples outside of the building and the collection of dust wipe samples inside of the building The soil samples were taken from the ground surface surrounding the building The wipe samples were taken from window wells window sills and floor sample locations The samples were located in accordance with the referenced guidance documents
- 30 METHODOLOGY
-
- 30 METHODOLOGY
- 31 FIELD SURVEY
- The assessment was conducted hased on the risk middot assessment field inspection and sample collection protocols established in the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Policy and the Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Lead-Based Paint Risk Assessment Protocol dated September 1992 The requirements of the DOD and HUD protocols middot are fundamentally the same Where deviations were noted the more stringent requirements were applied
- For each of the Quarters assessed the following dust wipe samples were collected
- Location
-
- Location
-
- Location
- Component
- Number of Samples
-
- Inside entrance
-
- Inside entrance
- Floor
- 1
-
- Kitchen
-
- Kitchen
- Floor
- 1
-
- TR
-
- Window WellSill
- 1
-
- Living Room
-
- Living Room
- Floor
- 1
-
- TR
-
- Window WellSill
- 1
-
- Bedroom 1
-
- Bedroom 1
- Floor
- 1
-
- TR
-
- Window WellSill
- 1
-
- Bedroom 2
-
- Bedroom 2
- Floor
- 1
-
- TR
-
- Window WellSill
- 1
-
- TR
-
- Total
- 9
-
- Wipe samples were collected inside the building using sterile latex surgical gloves to prevent contamination of the sample The samples were collected using a commercial wipe with a non alcohol wetting agent and placed in a 50 ml polypropylene sample container and shipped for laboratory analyses The wipe samples were taken by wiping any dust off of the surface sampled in a 1 square foot area for floos from the entire window sill
-
- -
-
- Two composite soil samples were collected at each building and each garage The first sample was collected around the building foundation in an area less than three (3) feet from the structure The second sample was collected around the building perimeter in area between approximately 15 -20 feet from the structure
- The soil samples were also taken from the playground at the Pedricktown Army Reserve Base
- Soil samples were collected using sterile latex surgical gloves to prevent contamination of the a sample The sample was collected in a 50 ml polypropylene sample container and shipped for laboratory analysis
- Based on the conditions encountered at each site additional samples were collected as necessary
-
- 32 LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM
-
- 32 LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM
- All dust wipe and soil samples were shipped to Housing Environmental Services Inc s Laboratory in Cambridge Massachusetts for analysis for lead concentration by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry according to the modified NIOSH 7082 method In addition to the wipe and soil samples which were collected a representative number of blank wipe samples were also collected and sent to the laboratory The blank was obtained by removing a commercial wipe from the package while wearing sterile gloves and immedi
- The samples were analyzed to determine if they had results which were above the permissible threshold limits established in the guidance documents
- 40 ASSESSMENT RESULTS
-
- 40 ASSESSMENT RESULTS
- 41 GENERAL ASSESSMENT OF CONDITIONS
- One objective of the assessment is to evaluate the conditions of the area surveyed This survey includes a visual observation of the paint conditions The survey also includes an assessment of previous projects which may have abated lead based paint Also management maintenance and training is assessed during the risk assessment
- During the inspection of the family housing units located on the Pedricktown Army Reserve Base an assessment of suspect LBP surfaces was made This assessment found surfaces to vary greatly from unit to unit and from interior surfaces to exterior surfaces of each unit Interiors of occupied units were generally in fair to good condition Interiors of vacant units ranged from good to poor Notable areas of interior damage were found in Quarters 132L where approximately fifty percent of the ceiling in the n
- Unit exteriors with the exception of Building Number 120 were uniform All wooden trim and porch structures were in very poor condition The paint on these components was found to contain very high concentrations of lead through XRF analysis It was apparent that the deteriorating paint was substantially contributing to the high levels of lead in the soil at the unit foundations All brick surfaces were unpainted and in very good condition A complete listing of building components and their assessed condit
- 42 PREVIOUS LBP ABATEMENT MODERNIZATION OR EXTRAORDINARY MAINTENANCE
- Information regarding any systematic LBP abatement projects was not provided Upon inspection it was apparent replacement of windows and unit entry doors had been conducted The window replacement project did not include the kitchen or basement windows in most units These remaining surfaces were found to contain high levels of lead in paint and dust
- Upon inspection of the units no substantial maintenance work was apparent except for window and door replacement middot The removal and replacement of the windows and doors most likely created a substantial amount of lead dust basedmiddot on the high concentration of lead in the remaining components Specifics as to when the work was conducted and what types of work and clean-up procedures were implemented was not provided prior to this report
- Information detailing lead abatement projects was not provided Based on the inspection of the units it is apparent that no organized LBP abatement projects have been conducted at this site Results of the comprehensive LBP survey and of the risk assessment samples indicate high levels of lead paint and lead dust remain in each of the units inspected
- 43 MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE STAFFING
-
- 43 MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE STAFFING
- Based on the information provided by the Housing Engineer maintenance work is contracted out and generally performed during vacancy unless an emergency presents itself Management of the maintenance contracts is conducted through the Chief of Contract Management at the Pedricktown base Upon vacancy an inspection of the unit is conducted by personnel from the maintenance department During this inspection items in need of repair are noted and the work is repaired prior to occupancy This inspection proces
- A complete preventive maintenance policy manual describing painting procedures and surface preparation that could potentially disturb lead-painted surfaces was not available for review prior to this report
- Work orders are addressed on an as needed basis preferably during unit turnover or if an emergency presents itself Discussions with residents indicated that it often takes several requests before maintenance personnel conduct repairs
-
- 44 PAINTING POLICY AND PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE
-
- 44 PAINTING POLICY AND PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE
- The repainting policy for units at the Pedricktown base is to repaint upon vacancy or every three years but generally not during occupation Painting is performed by an outside contractor This policy appears to apply to the interior surfaces only
- The interior surfaces were noted to be in good condition in all occupied units except for Building
- 120 The exterior wooden porches and building trim were noted to be in very poor condition for all units inspected Conditions indicate that itmiddothas been much longer than three years since these areas have been maintained Deteriorating exterior surfaces appear to be a substantial source of lead contamination in the living environments and should be addressed immediately
-
- 45 WORKER TRAINING AND PROTECTION
-
- 45 WORKER TRAINING AND PROTECTION
- According to the housing engineer maintenance is performed by outside contract and apparently all required training is the responsibility of the contractor Ogden was not informed of any training programs for base maintenance personnel relative to lead-based paint clean-up abatement or clearance procedures
- 50 CONCLUSIONS amp RECOMMENDATIONS
-
- 50 CONCLUSIONS amp RECOMMENDATIONS
- 51 CONCLUSIONS
- This risk assessment report included the assessment of the Residential Quarters at Pedricktown Army Reserve Base Pedricktown NJ The risk assessment survey included the collection of 141 samples for laboratory analysis These samples were submitted for laboratory analysis to determine if they had results measuring above the permissible threshold limits established by the Base Realignment and Closure Lead-Based Paint Policy and the Department of Housing and Urban Development Lead-Based Paint Risk Assessment
- Window wells 800 ugftWindow sills 500 ugftFloors 200 ugftSoils 500 ppm
-
- 2
- 2
- 2
-
- Appendix A contains the results of the sampling performed for this assessment
- The comprehensive LBP testing program conducted for these units and their associated garages established exterior wooden trim components to contain lead above the action level of 10 mg cmbull The assessment of these surfaces determined all to be in poor to very poor condition It is clear that the deterioration of these components is a substantial cause of contamination of soil around the unit foundations and is likely to be contributing to the contamination of interior floors
-
- 2
-
- A complete listing of all painted or varnished surfaces is included in the comprehensive LBP testing report in Appendix A
-
- 52 RECOMMENDATIONS
-
- 52 RECOMMENDATIONS
- 521 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BUILDING NO 120
-
- 521 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BUILDING NO 120
- Based on the deteriorated condition and the extreme levels of lead contamination in these units it is recommended that they be secured utilizing a chain link fence notmiddot less than six ( 6) feet high The fencing should extend in an area around the perimeter of the building not less than 15 feet from the structure This measure of security should be maintained until complete abatement can be completed
-
- 522 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BUILDING NOS 177 179 276 277 278
-
- 522 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BUILDING NOS 177 179 276 277 278
- Ogden recommends that either in-house capabilities be developed or a maintenance contractor who is trained equipped and certified to conduct LBP abatement and clean-up work be employed to address any maintenancerepair work that may disturb LBP surfaces This work would include any repairs and cleaning conducted during routine maintenance or renovations or as part of an on-going in-place management program
- Ogden recommends the comprehensive testing data should be consulted prior to conducting any maintenancerenovation projects to ensure that the work does not disturb known or suspect LBP surfaces without taking appropriate precautions All outside contractors should be notified of known or suspect LBP surfaces in order to ensure that their work plans will be conducted in accordance with the requirements established by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Environmental Protection A
- Ogden recommends personnel conducting facility maintenance inspections should be trained to identify and assess potential LBP hazards Inspection personnel should incorporate LBP testing and risk assessment information in their inspection process Work orders to remedy potential hazards should be submitted immediately and treated on a priority basis
- Ogden recommends the appropriate maintenance and contract management staff and any subordinates responsible for the oversight or execution of maintenance work renovation contracts receive training in accordance with the requirements established in the DOD LBP policy Should other military personnel conduct work disturbing known or suspect LBP surfaces it is recommended they receive appropriate worker or supervisory training covering topics outlined in the DOD LBP policy
- Ogden recommends all building occupants be notified of existing LBP conditions detailing locations of known or suspected surfaces above the action levels Residents should be instructed not to disturb any known or suspect painted surfaces unless proper precautions are initiated Residents should be encouraged to report any defective paint film to the designated maintenance authority in order for it to be cleaned and repaired properly Educational programs should be developed to instruct residents in proper
- Ogden recommends that all inconclusive surfaces be confirmed through chip sample analysis prior to any renovation work andor interiorexterior paint stabilization work that may disturb surfaces that have not been conclusively identified as to their lead content All non-intact
- surfaces should be evaluated and repaired in order to prevent recontamination of the building after in-place management
- _ Ogden recommends the following in-place management procedures to remediate the conditions assessed at the Residential Quarters at Pedricktown Army Reserve Base in this report The recommendations include environmental clean-up paint stabilization and soil remediation and should be performed at the earliest date possible All in-place management work should be conducted by trained and qualified personnel in accordance with the lead hazard abatement procedures established in the DOD LBP policy Due to the
- Window wellsWindow sills
- Dust wipe sample results indicate that approximately 35 -45 of all samples collected from window wells or window sills were above the permissible threshold limit It is recommended that all window wells and window sills be cleaned according to the following procedures (Windows which have been replaced with vinyl casements should be thoroughly cleaned utilizing HEP A vacuums and Tri-Sodium Phosphate detergents Associated painted or wooden components should be handled as specified below)
- a) Residents should not be permitted inside the area during this work
- b) All furniture should be removed from the work area or covered with plastic and all edges of the plastic sealed with tape to prevent dust from penetrating the plastic barrier The floor should be covered with 6-mil plastic sheeting for a distance of eight (8) feet from themiddot work area
- c) Respiratory protection and protective clothing measures are to be employed for this clean-up unless it can be documented through a pilot program that some or all protective measures are not necessary
- d) Use a HEPA vacuum to clean all window sills window wells and surrounding window trim After vacuuming using a paint scraping tool gently remove all loose non-intact paint from the window sills window trim window stops window wells and sashes To control dust and paint chips from circulating the area being scraped should be misted continually during scraping After scraping vacuum all dust and paint chips from the entire window area once again
- e) Upon completion of the second stage of HEPA vacuuming apply one (1) coat of latex enamel primer and one (1) coat of latex enamel finish paint to previously painted surfaces
- t) Upon completion of the painting stage using a phosphate detergent wash the lower portion of the windows thoroughly (include the sashes track sill stop and well) After the phosphate wash HEP A vacuum the window areas again to capture any residual dust
- g) When finished carefully fold plastic inward and vacuum all debris (ie paint chips dust etc) from the center of the plastic It is critical to remove visible debris from the plastic in order for the plastic to be disposed of as common rather than hazardous waste
- h) Use a HEPA vacuum to clean all floor areas With a phosphate detergent wash the floors thoroughly (include the door thresholds and exterior entry landings) HEP A vacuum the floors again to capture any residual dust
- i) Wipe samples should be collected from one (1) window sillwell in each room (with a maximum of two (2) bedrooms per unit) to verify the effectiveness of cleanup measures The windows sampled should be different from those sampled during the risk assessment process if possible
- j) The initial clean-up should be re-evaluated in six (6) months (from the time of the initial cleaning) by collecting wipe samples The window sillswells sampled should be different from those sampled after the initial clean-up process if possible At least one window sillwell in each room with a maximum of two (2) bedrooms per unit should be sampled
- Floors
-
- Floors
- For all areas listed above where floor samples were found abovemiddot the threshold limit of 200 ugft the following cleaning procedures should be implemented in each of the rooms listed
-
- 2
-
- a) Residents should not be permitted inside the area during this work
- b) All furniture and equipment should be removed from the work area or covered with poly
- c) Respiratory protection and protective clothing measures should be employed for this clean-up unless it can be documented through a pilot program that some or all protective measures are not necessary
- d) Use a HEPA vacuum to clean all floor areas With a phosphate detergent wash the floors thoroughly(include the door thresholds and stair treads) HEPA vacuum the floors again to capture any residual dust
- e) Collect wipe samples from each of the rooms (with a maximum of two (2) bedrooms per unit) and one (1) stair tread The floor areas sampled should be different from those sampled during the risk assessment process if possible These clearance procedures shall be applied to all reoccupancy practices for all units until fully abated
- t) The initial clean-up should be evaluated in six (6) months (from the time the areas are first cleaned) by collecting wipe samples Floor samples should be collected at different areas than those sampled for clearance after the initial clean-up if possible Wipe samples should be collected from each of the rooms in the unit (with a maximum of two
- (2) bedrooms per unit) and one (1) stair tread
- Soils
- Soil samples collected along the northeast corner of the building near the foundation were found to be above the threshold level of 500 PPM It is recommended that at a minimum all visible paint chips be removed utilizing HEP A vacuums or soil removal methods The area should then be covered with clean top soil in an area not less than three (3) feet from the structure Sod or other secure ground covering should be established in areas
- All exterior components contributing to soil contamination should be evaluated and repaired to ensure recontamination does not occur These surfaces should be addressed on a priority basis to ensure areas are not rapidly recontaminated Due to the poor condition of some painted surfaces a careful analysis of the economic benefit of in-place management of the material versus the complete abatement should be considered All in-place management work should be conducted by trained and qualified personnel in ac
- Interior Surfaces in Poor Condition
- For any interior areas where samples were found above the threshold limits and the paint was in poor condition the following cleaning procedures should be implemented
- a) All interior windows should be closed during the remediation work
- b) Residents should not be permitted within the work area while any remediation work is taking place
- c) Respiratory protection and protective clothing measures shall be employed for this clean up unless the Department of the Army can document through a pilot program that some or all protective measures are not necessary
- d) Any movable objects near the work site should be removed before work begins Any objects that cannot be moved should be thoroughly covered with 6 mil plastic and remain
-
- d) Any movable objects near the work site should be removed before work begins Any objects that cannot be moved should be thoroughly covered with 6 mil plastic and remain
- covered until the remediation work is complete Plastic should also be secured to cover the entire floor within the room where the work is being performed
-
- e) Moisten all painted surfaces to be treated with water using a spray bottle Gently scrape any loose paint and remove all dust with a HEP A vacuum paint scraping attachment Apply a paint primer coat and two coats of latex enamel to seal the areas after scraping Respirators should be worn at all times when destructive measures are employed
- t) When finished carefully fold plastic inward and vacuum all debris from the center of the plastic All debris and dust must be removed and the plastic can be disposed of as common waste and not hazardous waste
- g) Visually inspect work area and HEP A vacuum areas on the floor where paint chips have escaped the plastic sheeting
- h) Collect one wipe sample in each area where remediation work is performed to verify the effectiveness of the clean up measures The limits referenced above should be applied to determine the effectiveness
- i) The interior of the unit should then be inspected on an annual basis until they are abated to insure that the condition of the paint has not deteriorated
-
- Exterior Surf aces in Poor Condition
-
- Exterior Surf aces in Poor Condition
- For any exterior surfaces areas where samples were found above the threshold limits and the paint is in poor condition the following cleaning procedures should be implemented
- a) All windows should be closed during the remediation work
- b) Residents should not be permitted within the work area while any remediation work is taking place
- c) Respiratory protection and protective clothing measures shall be employed for this clean up unless the Department of the Army can document through a pilot program that some or all protective measures are not necessary
- d) Any movable objects near the work site should be removed before work begins Any objects that cannot be moved should be thoroughly covered with 6 mil plastic and remain covered until the remediation work is complete Plastic should also be secured at least 16 feet in all directions surrounding the immediate work area
- e) Moisten all painted surfaces to be treated with water using a spray bottle Gently scrape any loose paint and remove all dust with a HEP A vacuum paint scraping attachment Apply a paint primer coat and two coats of latex enamel to seal the areas after scraping
- Respirators should be worn at all times when destructive measures are employed
- f) When finished carefully fold plastic inward and vacuum all debris from the center of the plastic All debris and dust must be removed and the plastic can be disposed of as common waste and not hazardous waste
- g) Visually inspect work area and HEPA vacuum areas on the ground where paint chips have escaped the plastic sheeting
- h) Collect one soil sample in each area where remediation work is performed to verify the effectiveness of the clean up measures The limits referenced above should be applied to determine the effectiveness
- i) The interior of the unit should then be inspected on an annual basis until they are abated to insure that the condition of the paint has not deteriorated
- APPENDIX A FIELD SAMPLE COLLECTION LOG
- Pedricktown Army Reserve Base RISK ASSESSMENT
- ASSESSOR Eric Whiston BUILDING NUMBER 120S
- DATE June 13 1994 UNIT ADDRESS Quarters 120S CONTROL NUMBER 694033
- ~middot ~ ~~~ J gt-~middot x ~~1~t~F-~ ~-ltiJr~~~~J)~ffeI~i~M~~tl~gt1~~r ~ middot
-
- SAMPLES TESTING ABOVE PERMISSIBLE THRESHOLDS
-
- t~
- Sample Subst
- Wipe
- Cond
- No Type Room Surface Substrate Dimensions HK Sample Comments Unit Comments Results
- 2 w Ent~ Fo~er Floor Wood F 1200 X 1200 P at front ent~ vacant unit -sever~ deteriorated 3587 ugft2 3 w Kitchen Floor Vinyl p 900 X 900 p sampled at rear entry to porch -1)deg- 466 ugft2
- 4 w Kitchen Window Sill Wood p 300 X 2400 p sampled at window to porch 5028 ugft2
- 5 w living Room Floor Wood p 1200 X 1200 p sampled under middle window east wall 1142 ugft2 6 j J
-
- gt
-
- w living Room Window Sill Wood p 350 X 2400 p sampled at middle sill east wall 1 JC-middot 16029 ugft2
- Bedroom 1 Floor Wood p 1200 X 1200 p sampled at radiator 787 ugft2
-
- w
-
- 8
-
- 8
-
- 8
- w
- Bedroom 1
- Window Well
- Wood
- p
- 400 X 1300
- p
- sampled at east window north side
- 7Jo
- 5lt7
- ~
- 590538 ugft2
-
- 9 10
-
- 9 10
- w w
- Bedroom 3 Bedroom 3
- Floor Window Well
- Wood Wood
- p p
- 1200 X 1200 400 X 1300
- P p
- sampled at the entry to bedroom 3 sampled at the north window on the west wall
- 7_) J
- ~middotAc7 f
- gt
- 435 ugft2 753923 ugft2