LCLS Undulator Systems TDR Charge [email protected] Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford...

Technical Review, March 3, 2004Technical Review, March 3, 2004 John Galayda, SLACJohn Galayda, SLAC

LCLS Undulator Systems TDR ChargeLCLS Undulator Systems TDR Charge [email protected]@slac.stanford.edu

Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Linear Accelerator Center

LCLS Undulator Systems ReviewJohn N. Galayda, SLAC

March 3, 2004

LCLS Undulator Systems ReviewJohn N. Galayda, SLAC

March 3, 2004

Project DescriptionProject Description ScheduleSchedule Long-Lead ProcurementsLong-Lead Procurements Charge to CommitteeCharge to Committee

Project DescriptionProject Description ScheduleSchedule Long-Lead ProcurementsLong-Lead Procurements Charge to CommitteeCharge to Committee




The World’s First Hard X-ray LaserThe World’s First Hard X-ray LaserThe World’s First Hard X-ray LaserThe World’s First Hard X-ray Laser




CapabilitiesCapabilities

Spectral coverage: 0.15-1.5 nm

Peak Brightness: 1033

Average Brightness: 3 x 1022

Pulse duration: <230 fsec

Pulse repetition rate: 120 Hz

Photons/pulse: 1012

To 0.5 Ǻ in 3rd harmonic




Linac CenterLine

Sector 20 Linacs

Straight AheadTune-Up Dump

Sector 21-1B

5 meters

Scale:

L0-1

L0-2

RF TransverseDeflector

EmittanceWire Scanners Energy Wire

Scanner & OTR

Matching Section

Quadrupole,typ.

RFGun

Cathode LoadLock

DL1 Bend

Linac Solenoid

Gun Solenoid

Gun-to-Linac

L0 Linacs

Linac Coherent Light Source

Project Description

SLAC Linac

Two Chicanes for bunch compression

FFTB TunnelUndulator Hall

Near Hall

Far Hall




Photon Beam Handling Systems

X-ray Transport, Optics and DiagnosticsFront end systems – attenuators, shutters, diagnosticsOptics – the prerequisites for LCLS experiments

X-ray Endstation Systems Hutches, Personnel Protection

Computer facilities for experimentsLaser for pump/probe experimentsDetectors matched to LCLS requirements

Systems for first experiments in A/M/O physics

Linac Coherent Light Source




TransportTransport

UndulatorUndulator

Hall AHall A

TunnelTunnel

Hall BHall B

3 Beams/mirror3 Beams/mirror

ExpansionExpansion

Conventional ConstructionConventional Construction

Room for 8 additional undulator lines




LCLS OrganizationLCLS Organization

Chief Engineer – Mark ReichanadterChief Engineer – Mark Reichanadter US CMS Project EngineerUS CMS Project Engineer

Joins SLAC June 2003Joins SLAC June 2003

LLNL-LCLS Project DirectorLLNL-LCLS Project Director

Richard M. BiontaRichard M. Bionta

ANL-LCLS Project DirectorANL-LCLS Project Director

Stephen V. MiltonStephen V. MiltonLEUTL FEL accelerator research program at ANL-APSLEUTL FEL accelerator research program at ANL-APS

Chief Engineer – Mark ReichanadterChief Engineer – Mark Reichanadter US CMS Project EngineerUS CMS Project Engineer

Joins SLAC June 2003Joins SLAC June 2003

LLNL-LCLS Project DirectorLLNL-LCLS Project Director

Richard M. BiontaRichard M. Bionta

ANL-LCLS Project DirectorANL-LCLS Project Director

Stephen V. MiltonStephen V. MiltonLEUTL FEL accelerator research program at ANL-APSLEUTL FEL accelerator research program at ANL-APS




Estimated Cost, Revised ScheduleEstimated Cost, Revised Schedule

$220M-$260M Total Estimated Cost range$265M-$315M Total Project Cost range

FY2005 Long-lead purchases for injector, undulatorFY2006 Construction beginsJanuary 2008 FEL Commissioning beginsSeptember 2008 Construction complete

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 FY2008 FY2009

ConstructionConstruction OperatioOperationn

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003 FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007

CD-1 CD-2aCD-2b

CD-3a

CD-3bCD-0Title IDesignComplete

XFELCommissioning

CD-4




Recent EventsRecent Events

Critical Decision 1 ApprovedCritical Decision 1 Approved 10/200210/2002

Guidance for Funding Profile Updated Guidance for Funding Profile Updated 1/20031/2003

BES 20-year Roadmap ReviewBES 20-year Roadmap Review 2/20032/2003

Environmental Assessment ApprovedEnvironmental Assessment Approved 3/20033/2003

Authorization to spend PED fundsAuthorization to spend PED funds 3/20033/2003

SC-81 Lehman/Carney ReviewSC-81 Lehman/Carney Review 5/20035/2003

Critical Decision 2A ApprovedCritical Decision 2A Approved 7/20037/2003

Critical Decision 2B ApprovalCritical Decision 2B Approval 5/20045/2004

Critical Decision 3A ApprovalCritical Decision 3A Approval 9/20049/2004

Critical Decision 1 ApprovedCritical Decision 1 Approved 10/200210/2002

Guidance for Funding Profile Updated Guidance for Funding Profile Updated 1/20031/2003

BES 20-year Roadmap ReviewBES 20-year Roadmap Review 2/20032/2003

Environmental Assessment ApprovedEnvironmental Assessment Approved 3/20033/2003

Authorization to spend PED fundsAuthorization to spend PED funds 3/20033/2003

SC-81 Lehman/Carney ReviewSC-81 Lehman/Carney Review 5/20035/2003

Critical Decision 2A ApprovedCritical Decision 2A Approved 7/20037/2003

Critical Decision 2B ApprovalCritical Decision 2B Approval 5/20045/2004

Critical Decision 3A ApprovalCritical Decision 3A Approval 9/20049/2004




FY2005 Long Lead Procurements ($K, as spent)FY2005 Long Lead Procurements ($K, as spent)

Item Estimate Conting. Total FY2005 Spares Request Included in Total

1.2.1 Injector $11,732 $3,093 $14,825

1.2.2 Linac $3,435 $1,702 $5,137 $1,369

1.4.1 Linac alcove $1,356 $222 $1,578

1.2.3 Undulator mat'ls $5,484 $1,083 $6,567 $1,149

1.2.3 Mag Meas Device $784 $336 $1,120

1.4.7 Magnet Meas Rm. $1,200 $300 $1,500

Total $23,991 $6,736 $30,727 $2,518

To be reimbursed to TEC when Special SparesFunds are allocated.

28% Contingency (67% contingency onSuperconducting wiggler & spare)




Long-Lead Procurements, FY2005 - Undulator SystemsLong-Lead Procurements, FY2005 - Undulator Systems

Undulator HardwareUndulator HardwareMagnet BlocsMagnet Blocs

Magnet PolesMagnet Poles

StrongbackStrongback

Undulator Measurement SystemUndulator Measurement System

Final “shimming” of magnets at SLACFinal “shimming” of magnets at SLAC

Undulator HardwareUndulator HardwareMagnet BlocsMagnet Blocs

Magnet PolesMagnet Poles

StrongbackStrongback

Undulator Measurement SystemUndulator Measurement System

Final “shimming” of magnets at SLACFinal “shimming” of magnets at SLAC




LCLS Undulator Systems Review: ChargeLCLS Undulator Systems Review: Charge

To review the LCLS undulator system and to provide advice on the overall system and the various subsystem designs and their suitability to meet the performance specifications, on the installation and commissioning plan, and on the overall project management of the LCLS undulator system.

Commissioning: are the diagnostics “adequate” for commissioning and operations problems?Will we be able to troubleshoot the undulator systems, and rapidly identify out-of-tolerance subsystems?

Gain vs. z is an excellent all-purpose tuning signalSASE gain at long wavelength should not be very difficultSASE gain at short wavelength – beam travels 50m before gain is evidentTo K or not to K?To rollaway or not to rollaway?Intra-undulator x-ray diagnostics are very challenging, not amenable to scheduling

To review the LCLS undulator system and to provide advice on the overall system and the various subsystem designs and their suitability to meet the performance specifications, on the installation and commissioning plan, and on the overall project management of the LCLS undulator system.

Commissioning: are the diagnostics “adequate” for commissioning and operations problems?Will we be able to troubleshoot the undulator systems, and rapidly identify out-of-tolerance subsystems?

Gain vs. z is an excellent all-purpose tuning signalSASE gain at long wavelength should not be very difficultSASE gain at short wavelength – beam travels 50m before gain is evidentTo K or not to K?To rollaway or not to rollaway?Intra-undulator x-ray diagnostics are very challenging, not amenable to scheduling





Review and evaluate the complete system design. Is the maturity of the design known to the level of detail to justify setting the cost and schedule performance baseline at this time?

Identify any open design issues that should be addressed prior to setting the baseline.

Is the management team adequately structured for completing the LCLS design?

Are there adequate resources and of the correct skill type to meet the needs of the project?Is the project progressing adequately?

Review and evaluate the complete system design. Is the maturity of the design known to the level of detail to justify setting the cost and schedule performance baseline at this time?

Identify any open design issues that should be addressed prior to setting the baseline.

Is the management team adequately structured for completing the LCLS design?

Are there adequate resources and of the correct skill type to meet the needs of the project?Is the project progressing adequately?





A written report of the committee’s findings, A written report of the committee’s findings, comments and recommendations is requested.comments and recommendations is requested.

Please highlight areas of risk and any questions requiring Please highlight areas of risk and any questions requiring follow-up.follow-up.

This report will be very helpful in preparing for a This report will be very helpful in preparing for a DOE Performance Baseline review in April 2004.DOE Performance Baseline review in April 2004.

We thank the committee in advance for taking time out of We thank the committee in advance for taking time out of their busy schedules to provide us with this important their busy schedules to provide us with this important feedback on the LCLS Undulator Systems design. feedback on the LCLS Undulator Systems design.

A written report of the committee’s findings, A written report of the committee’s findings, comments and recommendations is requested.comments and recommendations is requested.

Please highlight areas of risk and any questions requiring Please highlight areas of risk and any questions requiring follow-up.follow-up.

This report will be very helpful in preparing for a This report will be very helpful in preparing for a DOE Performance Baseline review in April 2004.DOE Performance Baseline review in April 2004.

We thank the committee in advance for taking time out of We thank the committee in advance for taking time out of their busy schedules to provide us with this important their busy schedules to provide us with this important feedback on the LCLS Undulator Systems design. feedback on the LCLS Undulator Systems design.




End of Presentation

LCLS Undulator Systems TDR Charge [email protected] Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford...

Documents

Transcript of LCLS Undulator Systems TDR Charge [email protected] Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford...