Law and Philosophy

download Law and Philosophy

of 42

Transcript of Law and Philosophy

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    1/42

    Warfare and

    Independence

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    2/42

    Introduction

    A war is the name given to the act of fighting between twoor more groups, nations or countries

    warfare is the tactics, methods, strategies and scienceinvolved in fighting the enemy. So, for example, chemical warfare (a tactic to help you win)was used in The Great War (the name of the conflict). An

    absence of war (and other violence) is usually called peace or

    also known as independence. Independence is a person, country, nation and etcetera which

    are not influenced or controlled by others opinion, or conduct

    in a form of thinking or acting for oneself

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    3/42

    WAR AND WARFARE

    The meaning of war is an organized, armed, and, usually aprolonged conflict that is carried on between countries,

    nations, or other some other parties typified by extreme

    aggression, social disruption, and usually high mortality.

    War should be understood as an actual, intentional andwidespread armed conflict between political communities,

    and thus it is defined as a form of political violence.

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    4/42

    Greek

    Goddess Athena aka Pallas Athena

    in Greek religion and mythology, goddess of wisdom, courage, inspiration, civilization, law and

    justice, just warfare, mathematics, strength, strategy, the arts, crafts,

    and skill.

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    5/42

    The metalwork of weapons also fell under her patronage. She led battles as the disciplined, strategic side of war, in contrast to

    her brother Ares (the patron of violence, bloodlust and slaughter "the

    raw force of war)

    Though Athena is a goddess of war strategy, she disliked fightingwithout purpose and preferred to use wisdom to settle predicaments. Athena only encouraged fighting for a reasonable cause or to

    resolve conflict.

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    6/42

    China

    Sun Tzu - The Art of War

    a high-ranking military general, strategist

    tactician

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    7/42

    war was a vital weapon in order to widen the territory It presents a philosophy of war for managing conflicts

    and winning battles.

    Forthe last two thousand years it remained the mostimportant military treatise in Asia, where even the

    common people knew it by name."

    It has had an influence on Eastern and Westernmilitary thinking, business tactics, legal strategy, andbeyond.

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    8/42

    Carl von Clausewitz - On War

    a practical field soldier with extensive combatexperience against the armies of the

    Revolutionary France

    a staff officer with political and militaryresponsibilities at the very centre of the

    Prussian state a prominent military educator.

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    9/42

    His work combines observations on strategywith questions about human nature and the

    purpose of war

    especially examines the teleology of war:whether war is a means to an end outside

    itself or whether it can be an end in itself.

    He concludes that the latter cannot be so,and that war is "politics by different means";i.e. that war must not exist only for its own

    sake. It must serve some purpose for the

    state.

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    10/42

    Waris nothing but a duel on a larger scale.Countless duels go to make up war, but a

    picture of it as a whole can be formed by

    imagining a pair of wrestlers. Each triesthrough physical force to compel the other to

    do his will; his immediate aim is to throw his

    opponent in order to make him incapable offurther resistance.

    War is thus an act of force to compel ourenemy to do our will.

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    11/42

    These are some of thought regarding themeaning of war ,other than that he also shared

    his view regarding the purpose and means in

    war in which we can now see that in war manyroads lead to success, and that they do not all

    involve the opponent's outright defeat.

    They range from the destruction of the enemy'sforces, the conquest of his territory, to a

    temporary occupation or invasion, to projects

    with an immediate political purpose, and finally

    to passively awaiting the enemy's attacks.

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    12/42

    WAR AND WARFARE

    The most significance warfare would be conventionalwarfare, unconventional warfare, nuclear warfare,

    asymmetric warfare, and chemical warfare.

    Conventional warfare is when either party, without usingany nuclear, biological or chemical weapons but usingconventional weapon instead such as small arms, which

    generally aim to reduce opponents military capability upon a

    direct confrontation. In contrast, unconventional warfare is an attempt to

    achieve military victory through acquiescence, capitulation,

    or clandestine support for one side of an existing conflict.

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    13/42

    WAR AND WARFARE

    The usage of nuclear weapons as a major method to inflictdamage to the opposition is call nuclear warfare.

    Civil warfare usually involves fight between two partiesunder one nation for a control or independence. Other than that, there is also asymmetric warfare in whichwhen both parties military capabilities level is not on par. At

    the same time usually, the party with more power will use

    unconventional warfare tactics. Last but not least, chemical warfare is a technique of

    spreading air pollution on purpose such as poison gas.

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    14/42

    INDEPENDENCE

    INDEPENDENCE is a condition of a country, nation or statein which its residents and population or some portion thereof,

    exercising self-government and are usually sovereignty, over

    the territory.

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    15/42

    INDEPENDENCE

    There has always been a debate on how the attainment ofindependence is different from revolution, whether the

    violence is a legitimate means in achieving sovereignty.

    While some revolutions only seeks in achieving nationalindependence, others seeks in redistributing power with orwithout an element of emancipation

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    16/42

    INDEPENDENCE

    Autonomy is a type of independence which has been grantedby an authority that still in retaining of ultimate territory.

    Protectorate refers to an autonomous region that dependsupon government that is bigger for its protection as

    autonomous region.

    Independence is typically celebrated as national holiday.

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    17/42

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    18/42

    POSITIVIST

    John Austin

    Law is a type of command

    It is laid down by a political sovereign

    It is enforceable by sanction

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    19/42

    Law of war

    is a body of law concerning acceptablejustifications to engage in war (jus ad bellum)

    limits to acceptable wartime conduct (jus inbello or International humanitarian law).

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    20/42

    Some of the central principles underlying laws of

    war are:

    Wars should be limited to achieving the politicalgoals that started the war (e.g., territorial control)and should not include unnecessary destruction.

    Wars should be brought to an end as quickly aspossible.

    People and property that do not contribute to thewar effort should be protected against

    unnecessary destruction and hardship.

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    21/42

    To this end, laws of war are intended to

    mitigate the hardships of war by:

    Protecting both combatants andnoncombatants from unnecessary

    suffering.

    Safeguarding certain fundamental humanrights of persons who fall into the hands of

    the enemy, particularly prisoners of war,the wounded and sick, and civilians.

    Facilitating the restoration of peace.

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    22/42

    War

    There no definite reason as why a certaingovernment choose war

    However in that particular government view, itwill include for the sake of improving thecountry itself or protecting or defending from

    the opponent attack

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    23/42

    Thus, in positivist view there is an acceptablejustifications to engage in war and limits to

    acceptable wartime conduct

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    24/42

    NATURALIST

    Thomas Acquinas

    Positive law that violates natural law is nottrue law

    An unjust law is not a true law, in a whichunjust is defines as contrary to natural law.

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    25/42

    War

    In a typical war, there will always be extremeagression, social disruption and high mortality

    It will affect physical, verbal, mental andemotional aspect of a human being

    A human being should live their lifepeacefully

    Thus, war is against natural law Hence, against Thomas Acquinas view

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    26/42

    Independence

    Everyone would want to live freely, wherethey can choose what to do without any

    outside influence.

    Even though such free-state is up to acertain limitation, living life peacefully is what

    everyone would want, thus in line with natural

    law Therefore, Thomas Acquinas will support

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    27/42

    UTILTARIANIST

    JeremyBentham

    - "The greatest good for the greates number of

    people"

    -"nature has placed mankind under the

    governanance of 2 sovereign masters, pain

    and pleasure

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    28/42

    WAR

    Utilitariaist view may be in favour and against war. If war bring more harm than good. It strip off a person

    life, or family and destroy their properties. The majority

    will definitely be in deprived state, converse with greatest

    hapiness to greatest number of people. In addition war

    wil bring more pain than pleasure.Thus, utilitarianist will

    go against war.

    However, if a war was meant to be for the futureupbringing of the country, utilitarianist may in favour towar.

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    29/42

    UTUTILITARIANIST ON

    INDEPENDENCE

    - In general, Utilitarianist can be said in favour

    with independence, since independence in it

    literal meaning is a good thing for the society.

    - However up to a point, this depends due to

    the fact that at what extent a society is said to

    be in an independence state.For example New Zealand.

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    30/42

    ISLAMIST VIEW ON WAR

    "Eliminate evil from the heart of others by uprooting it from yourheart."

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    31/42

    War may become necessary only to stop evil from triumphing in a waywould corrupt the earth (Quran 2:251). For Muslims to participate inwar there must be valid justifications, and strict conditions must befulfilled. A thorough survey of the relevant verses of the Qur'an shows

    that it is consistent throughout with regard to these rulings on thejustification of war, and its conduct, termination and consequences.

    War in Islam as regulated by the Qur'an and hadith has been subject tomany distortions by Western scholars and even by some Muslimwriters. These are due either to misconceptions about terminology or -

    above all -using quotations taken out of context.2 Nowhere in the Quranis changing people's religion given as a cause for waging war. TheQur'an gives a clear instruction that there is no compulsion in religion(Quran 2:256). It states that people will remain different (Quran11:118), they will always have different religions and ways and this isan unalterable fact (Quran 5:48) - God tells the Prophet that most

    people will not believe"even if you are eager that they should"(Quran12:103).3

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    32/42

    All the battles that took place during the Prophet's lifetime, underthe guidance of the Qur'an and the Prophet, have been surveyed andshown to have been waged only in self-defense or to pre-empt an

    imminent attack.4

    For more than ten years in Mecca, Muslims werepersecuted, but before permission was given to fight they wereinstructed to restrain themselves (Quran 4:77) and endure with

    patience and fortitude:

    Pardon and forgive until God gives his command. Quran 2:109; seealso 29:59; 16:42

    Here, war is seen as justifiable and necessary to defend people's right totheir own beliefs, and once the believers have been given victory theyshould not become triumphant or arrogant or have a sense of being a

    superpower, because the promise of help given above and the rewardsare for those who do not seek to exalt themselves on earth or spreadcorruption (Quran 28:83).

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    33/42

    War is the worst thing known to mankind .War is the worst thing known tomankind throughout his long history. It brings about the killing and maiming of

    human beings, the loss of their powers and their disfigurement. It also causes the

    destruction of civilisations, stirs up hatred and resentments amongst people, andpasses psychological problems on to future generations. It also causes the fighters

    to become prisoners of war. For these reasons, war must be avoided at all costs and

    if war becomes necessarybecause the enemy has forced the situationit is

    imperative that war should be limited to the least degree of necessity. It is also

    imperative that humanity in general put an end to wars finally so that they do not

    occur in the future.

    War is an illness

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    34/42

    A group of religious scholars have said that war in itself is bad and uglybecause it entails the killing of people and destruction. The Holy Quran

    supports this in the following verse:

    {Fighting is prescribed upon you though ye dislike it. But it is possible thatyou dislike a thing that is good for you and that youlove a thing that is bad

    for you. Allah knoweth and you knoweth not.}

    On the surface, this verse shows that if fighting were a natural thing thenAllah would not have said: {though ye dislike it.}. Therefore, war is asocial phenomenon brought about by corrupt instincts and not something

    natural in humanity.

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    35/42

    Look also at this hadith related by Imam al-Saadiq (A) who said:The Messenger of Allah when he wanted to send out a troop he calledthem and bid them sit before him. He then said to them: Go out in the

    name of Allah and by Allah and in the way of Allah and according tothe religion of the Messenger of Allah. Do not handcuff or tie up (the

    prisoners of war), do not mutilate (even the dead), and do not betraypeople. Do not kill the old man, the child or the woman, and do not cutdown a single tree except when you are forced to do so. And if any

    Muslim be he lofty or lowly gives a man of the Polytheists sanctuary,then his safety must be secured so that he hears the word of Allah. If hefollows you then he is your brother in religion. If he refuses then givehim his sanctuary and seek the help of Allah regarding him.

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    36/42

    In an account on the occasion of war, Imam Amir-ul-Mumineen (A)advised the Muslims saying:

    Commit yourselves to prayer and guard your prayers and pray much. Seeknearness to Allah through it for it is a duty of the Muslims at prescribedtimes.

    He also used to say: Do not fight them until they begin to fight you.

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    37/42

    Aggression is Forbidden. Fighting is permitted

    only in self-defence.

    The Quranic verses on this are very clear. Godrepeats, "do not aggress", multiple times. Only if

    attacked, is one permitted to fight back. If the other

    party refrains from aggression and offers one peace,

    we are told to stop fighting.

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    38/42

    Rules of War*

    [2:190] You may fight in the cause of GOD against those who attackyou, but do not aggress. GOD does not love the aggressors.

    [2:191] You may kill those who wage war against you, and you may evict

    them whence they evicted you. Oppression is worse than murder. Do not

    fight them at the Sacred Masjid, unless they attack you therein. If they

    attack you, you may kill them. This is the just retribution for those

    disbelievers.[2:192] If they refrain, then GOD is Forgiver, Most Merciful.

    [2:193] You may also fight them to eliminate oppression, and to worship

    GOD freely. If they refrain, you shall not aggress; aggression is permitted

    only against the aggressors.

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    39/42

    *2:190 All fighting is regulated by the basic rule in 60:8-9. Fighting isallowed strictly in self-defense, while aggression and oppression are

    strongly condemned throughout the Quran.

    [5:87] O you who believe, do not prohibit good things that are madelawful by GOD, and do not aggress; GOD dislikes the aggressors.

    [8:61] If they resort to peace, so shall you, and put your trust in GOD.He is the Hearer, the Omniscient.

    [4:90] ... if they leave you alone, refrain from fighting you, and offeryou peace, then GOD gives you no excuse to fight them.

    http://www.submission.info/quran/noframes/ch60.htmlhttp://www.submission.info/quran/noframes/ch60.htmlhttp://www.submission.info/quran/noframes/ch60.htmlhttp://www.submission.info/quran/noframes/ch60.html
  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    40/42

    Application :

    Based on the dalil and hadith, we found that Islam does not

    favor War and if it is really needed to be done then only it

    shall be done.

    War is the last solution. Islam does not favor violence andoppression. That is why war is the least favorable thing to do.

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    41/42

    Allah SWT did stated that have war in the Go out in the name of Allah and byAllah and in the way of Allah and that dont have war for old man, women and

    children.

    Islam prohibits against any violence to these three categories of people. If youwish to war , war with the enemy that is of the same size or strength with you.

    Islam also prohibits us from initiating the war first. Only if we are beingattacked then we may fight back for self defense.

    Islam does not teaches us to have war without no valid reason. This means, war is a worst thing known to mankind and that Allah prohibits us

    to start the war first without any valid reason.

    Furthermore, war is an illness. More of the innocent lives are taken awayeveryday.

    Therefore, it is highly recommended that war is the last resort in resortingproblems between people.

  • 7/30/2019 Law and Philosophy

    42/42

    GROUP STAND