Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at...

16
Lattice 2006 Tucson, A Z T.Umeda (BNL) 1 QCD thermodynamics with N QCD thermodynamics with N f f =2+1 =2+1 near the near the continuum limit at realisti continuum limit at realisti c quark masses c quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC - Bielefeld Collaboration Lattice 2006 Tucson AZ 23-28 July 2006

description

Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)3 Computers 3.2

Transcript of Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at...

Page 1: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC.

Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 1

QCD thermodynamics with NQCD thermodynamics with Nff=2+1 near th=2+1 near thee continuum limit at realistic quark masse continuum limit at realistic quark massess

Takashi Umeda (BNL)

for the RBC - Bielefeld Collaboration

Lattice 2006 Tucson AZ 23-28 July 2006

Page 2: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC.

Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 2

Motivation & Motivation & ApproachApproach

Choice of quark action Improved Staggered quark action Continuum limit

- Nt = 4, 6, (8) a ⋍ 0.24, 0.17, (0.12) fm

Quantitative study of QCD thermodynamics from first principle calculation (Lattice QCD) Tc, EoS, phase diagram, small μ, etc...

from recent studies, we know these quantities strongly depend on mq & Nf

Our aim is QCD thermodynamics with 2+1 flavor at almost realistic quark masses e.g. pion mass ⋍ 150MeV, kaon mass ⋍ 500MeV

Page 3: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC.

Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 3

ComputersComputers

http://www.quark.phy.bnl.gov/~hotqcd3.2

Page 4: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC.

Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 4

Choice of Lattice Choice of Lattice ActionAction

gluonic part : Symanzik improvement scheme- remove cut-off effects of O(a2)

- tree level improvement O(g0) fermion part : improved staggered fermion

- remove cut-off effects & improve rotational sym.- improve flavor symmetry by smeared 1-link term

Improved Staggered action : p4fat3 actionKarsch, Heller, Sturm (1999)

fat3

p4

Page 5: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC.

Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 5

Properties of the p4-Properties of the p4-action action

The free quark propagator isrotational invariant up to O(p4)

Bulk thermodynamic quantitiesshow drastically reduced cut-offeffects

flavor sym. is also improved by fat link

Dispersion relation pressure in high T limit

Page 6: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC.

Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 6

Contents of this Contents of this talktalk

Motivation and Approach

Choice of lattice action

Critical temperature

- Simulation parameters

- Critical β search

- Scale setting by Static quark potential

- Critical temperature

Spatial string tension

Conclusion

Page 7: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC.

Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 7

Simulation Simulation parametersparameters

T=0 scale setting at βc(Nt)

Critical β search at T > 0

(*) conf. = 0.5 MD traj.

(*) conf. = 5 MD traj. after thermalization

to check ms dependence for Tc

Page 8: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC.

Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 8

Critical Critical ββ search search

chiral condensate:chiral susceptibility:

multi-histogram method (Ferrenberg-Swendson) is used βc are determined by peak positions of the susceptibilities

Transition becomes stronger for smaller light quark masses

83x4

Page 9: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC.

Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 9

Volume dependence of Volume dependence of ββ cc

No large change in peak height & position consistent with crossover transition rather than true transition

Page 10: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC.

Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 10

Uncertainties in Uncertainties in ββ cc

We can find a difference between β l and βL

small difference but statistically significant β l : peak position of χ l

βL : peak position of χL

Statistical error jackknife analysis for peak-position of susceptibility

- the difference is negligible at 163x4 (Ns/Nt=4) - no quark mass dependence- the difference at 163x 6 are taken into account as a systematic error in βc

Page 11: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC.

Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 11

Scale setting at Scale setting at T=0T=0

Lattice scale is determined by a static quark potential V(r)

statistical error jackknife error

systematic errors diff. between V3(r) & V4(r) diff. in various fit range (rmin=0.15-0.3fm, rmax=0.7-0.9fm)

where, rI is the improve dist.

Page 12: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC.

Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 12

ββ & m & mqq dependence of r dependence of r00

RG inspired ansatz with 2-loop beta-function R(β)

The fit result is used

(1) correction for the diff. between βc & simulation β at T=0

(2) convertion of sys. + stat. error in βc to error of r0/a

A = -1.53(11), B = -0.88(20)C = 0.25(10), D = -2.45(10) χ2/dof = 1.2

Page 13: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC.

Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 13

Critical Critical temperaturetemperature

ratio to string tension:ratio to Sommer scale:

( fit form dependence d=1,2 : upper, lower errors)

( d=1.08 from O(4) scaling )

Finally we obtain Tc=192(5)(4)MeV from r0=0.469(7)fm

at phys. point,

Preliminary result

Page 14: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC.

Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 14

Spatial string Spatial string tensiontension

Static quark “potential” from Spatial Wilson loops

(free parameters: c, Λσ)g2(T) is given by the 2-loop RG equation

Important to check theoretical concepts (dim. reduction) at high T

“c” should equal with 3-dim. string tension and should be flavor independent, if dim. reduction works

Numerical simulationfixed

Page 15: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC.

Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 15

Spatial string Spatial string tensiontension

Quenched case: G.Boyd et al. Nucl.Phys.B469(’96)419.

2+1 flavor case:

3“c” is flavor independent within error dim. reduction works well even for T=2Tc

(free parameters: c, Λσ)

Page 16: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC.

Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 16

SummarySummary Nf=2+1 simulation with realistic quark mass at Nt=4, 6

critical temperature

Tcr0=0.456(7), (Tc=192(5)(4)MeV from r0=0.469)

- Tcr0 is consistent with previous p4 result difference in Tc mainly comes from physical value of r0

- however, our value is about 10% larger than MILC result MILC collab., Phys. Rev. D71(‘05) 034504. - most systematic uncertainties are taken into account remaining uncertainty is in continuum extrapolation

spatial string tension dimensional reduction works well even for T=2Tc