latest version of Adobe Reader or GoodReader. -...
Transcript of latest version of Adobe Reader or GoodReader. -...
Before you cast your vote on Management Resolution Item 3 – Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation, please consider the following:
ExxonMobil conducts business in a volatile commodity price environment and positions itself to achieve industry-leading returns regardless of industry conditions. We continue to create value for our shareholders by confidently and prudently investing through the price cycle to meet long-term energy demand growth. Our integrated business enables us to optimize economic returns across the oil and gas value chain. The Corporation’s success requires a strong culture of performance, a long-term orientation, and constancy of purpose among senior executives, all of which are reinforced by the design of our compensation program.
Please review the content of this Overview, as well as the more detailed information included in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables, and narrative in ExxonMobil’s 2016 Proxy Statement.
Jeffrey J. Woodbury Vice President, Investor Relations and Secretary
vote
For optimal viewing on computer, please use Adobe 11 or newer; for mobile devices use the latest version of Adobe Reader or GoodReader.
If you want to download a printable version of this Overview click here.
Continue
2016
Executive Compensation Overview
Start
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
How do we link performance and pay?How did we perform? How did we pay? How do we manage risk?
• Leading safety performance
• Earnings of $16.2 billion
• Distributed $15.1 billion to shareholders
• Industry-leading ROCE of 7.9 percent
• Resilience and value of integrated business model reinforced by relative performance during industry downturn
• Strongest balance sheet among industry peers
• Relative performance across 7 key metrics and over time periods aligned with investment lead times of the business determines the level of individual long-term stock and bonus awards
• Overall CEO reported pay down 18 percent and realized pay down 15 percent, reflective of industry downturn
• CEO realized and unrealized pay at 39th percentile of benchmark companies over tenure [view chart]
• Ultimate value of long-term stock awards determined by share price at vest
• Vesting periods that are 3 times longer than competitors
• Significant stock holding requirement through long vesting periods
• Unvested stock is at risk of forfeiture and cannot be used as collateral for any purpose, including during retirement
• No change-in-control arrangements
• No employment contracts
• Strong bonus clawback policy
• Solid business performance through the commodity cycle relative to industry peers
• Compensation is based on significant performance differentiation
• Program design includes extended risk profile and is aligned with the Company's business model and the interests of long-term shareholders
Key Messages and Why Vote "For" Say-On-Pay? | Shareholder Engagement and Prior Say-On-Pay Vote | 2015 Say-On-Pay
Key Messages Why Vote "For" Say-On-Pay?
Key Messages and Why Vote "For" Say-On-Pay?Executive Summary
Executive Summary
> > >
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
How do we link performance and pay?How did we perform? How did we pay? How do we manage risk?
• Leading safety performance
• Earnings of $16.2 billion
• Distributed $15.1 billion to shareholders
• Industry-leading ROCE of 7.9 percent
• Resilience and value of integrated business model reinforced by relative performance during industry downturn
• Strongest balance sheet among industry peers
• Relative performance across 7 key metrics and over time periods aligned with investment lead times of the business determines the level of individual long-term stock and bonus awards
• Overall CEO reported pay down 18 percent and realized pay down 15 percent, reflective of industry downturn
• CEO realized and unrealized pay at 39th percentile of benchmark companies over tenure [view chart]
• Ultimate value of long-term stock awards determined by share price at vest
• Vesting periods that are 3 times longer than competitors
• Significant stock holding requirement through long vesting periods
• Unvested stock is at risk of forfeiture and cannot be used as collateral for any purpose, including during retirement
• No change-in-control arrangements
• No employment contracts
• Strong bonus clawback policy
• Solid business performance through the commodity cycle relative to industry peers
• Compensation is based on significant performance differentiation
• Program design includes extended risk profile and is aligned with the Company's business model and the interests of long-term shareholders
Key Messages and Why Vote "For" Say-On-Pay? | Shareholder Engagement and Prior Say-On-Pay Vote | 2015 Say-On-Pay
Key Messages Why Vote "For" Say-On-Pay?
Key Messages and Why Vote "For" Say-On-Pay?Executive Summary
Executive Summary
> > >
14. Realized and Unrealized Pay(4)
• CEO’s combined realized and unrealized pay over his tenure is at the 39th percentile of compensation benchmark companies
• With pension value and nonqualified deferred compensation included, the orientation is between the 38th and 74th percentiles, depending on the method of quantifying pension values
ExxonMobil CEO’s Tenure 2006 to 2014 Percentile Position
Realized Pay 26% 10 of 13
Combined Realized and Unrealized Pay 39% 8 of 13
PU1
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
• Shareholder engagement strategy focuses on wide-ranging dialogue between numerous shareholders and management. For 2015, this included:
- Individual conference calls on multiple occasions throughout the year with the Company’s largest shareholders; and,
- Webcast on May 14, 2015, available to all shareholders.
• These engagements provided an excellent opportunity to discuss alignment between performance and pay, as well as the Company’s long-standing philosophy that executive compensation should be based on long-term performance, aligned with the investment lead times of the business, as our Proxy materials demonstrate.
• In assessing the executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee on multiple occasions:
- Evaluated alternate methods of granting compensation;
- Carefully considered the results of the 2015 advisory vote on executive compensation and the insights gained from this extensive dialogue; and,
- Discussed this subject with its independent consultant.
• Based on this assessment, the Committee confirmed that the current compensation program best ensures an unwavering focus on the long-term performance of the business, which the Committee expects will continue generating strong operating and financial results for the benefit of the Company’s long-term shareholders.
• The Committee respects all shareholder votes, both “For” and “Against” our compensation program, and is committed to continued engagement with shareholders to ensure a full understanding of diverse viewpoints.
Key Messages and Why Vote "For" Say-On-Pay? | Shareholder Engagement and Prior Say-On-Pay Vote | 2015 Say-On-Pay
Shareholder Engagement and Prior Say-On-Pay Vote
Shareholder Engagement and Prior Say-On-Pay Vote
Executive Summary
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
• Say-On-Pay Results: 90.1 percent “For”
• We heard positive feedback from shareholders on:
- Extensive shareholder engagement
- New disclosure on the 7 key performance metrics that determine the number of long-term stock awards at grant
- Long-term vesting as a unique design feature that requires stock holding through the commodity cycle
- Market orientation based on realized and unrealized pay
• We also identified two improvement opportunities from our dialogue with shareholders:
- Further clarify how, in our program, performance criteria at grant (versus vest) strengthen the linkage between performance and pay, and allow for longer vesting periods. The combination of performance criteria at grant and longer vesting results in alignment with shareholder interests in a way that exceeds more traditional performance shares
- Increase disclosure on how the performance award matrix determines the level of individual stock and bonus awards
Key Messages and Why Vote "For" Say-On-Pay? | Shareholder Engagement and Prior Say-On-Pay Vote | 2015 Say-On-Pay
2015 Say-On-Pay
2015 Say-On-Pay
Executive Summary
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
How did we perform? Safety and ROCE
Industry-leading performance across companies within the oil and gas industry of similar scale and complexity formed the basis for compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2015
25
20
15
10
5
0
–5ExxonMobil ShellChevron BPTotal
(percent)
"2015" "11-15" "06-15""Exxon" 7.9 18.2 22.7"Chevron" 2.4 13.4 16.6"Shell" 2.2 9.4 12.5"Total" 4.3 8.3 11.1 "BP" -2.5 7.7 10.2
DATA AS OF 02/12/2016
-5
0
5
10
15
20
2506-15
11-15
2015
BPTotalShellChevronExxon
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 28, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
02 14XOMECO-ROCE.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 02
!CHART
IS IN
BOTHFO and EOC
alsoF02B
2015 5-Year Average 10-Year Average
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
SSHE: Tyler
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 29, 2016
SSHE: Tyler
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
01 15XOMECO-Safety.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 01alsoS37A
(incidents per 200,000 work hours)
ExxonMobil Workforce(1) U.S. Petroleum Industry Benchmark(2)
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
008 102006 07 09 11 1312 14 2015
(1) Employees and contractors. Includes XTO Energy Inc. data beginning in 2011.(2) Workforce safety data from participating American Petroleum Institute companies (2015 industry data not available at time of publication).
DATA as of 01/25/2015:
2015 API data not availableuntil April/May timeframe
"XOM" "Benchmark"“06” 0.051 0.22“07” 0.048 0.19“08” 0.051 0.18“09” 0.041 0.12“10” 0.038 0.13"11" 0.077 0.12“12” 0.046 0.11“13” 0.044 0.12“14” 0.031 0.11“15” 0.034
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30Benchmark
XOM
“15”“14”“13”“12”11“10”“09”“08”“07”“06”
Lost-Time Injuries and Illnesses Rate:
!CHART
IS IN
BOTHSAR and EOC
1. Safety and Operations Integrity
• Leading safety performance; results are a leading indicator of business performance and underscore safety as a core value
How did we perform?
Safety and ROCE | Shareholder Returns | Free Cash Flow and Shareholder Distributions | Strategic Business Results
2. Return on Average Capital Employed (ROCE)(3)
• Balanced and highly competitive portfolio of resources, assets, and products in each business segment, resulting in industry-leading ROCE
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
How did we perform? Safety and ROCE
Industry-leading performance across companies within the oil and gas industry of similar scale and complexity formed the basis for compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2015
25
20
15
10
5
0
–5ExxonMobil ShellChevron BPTotal
(percent)
"2015" "11-15" "06-15""Exxon" 7.9 18.2 22.7"Chevron" 2.4 13.4 16.6"Shell" 2.2 9.4 12.5"Total" 4.3 8.3 11.1 "BP" -2.5 7.7 10.2
DATA AS OF 02/12/2016
-5
0
5
10
15
20
2506-15
11-15
2015
BPTotalShellChevronExxon
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 28, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
02 14XOMECO-ROCE.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 02
!CHART
IS IN
BOTHFO and EOC
alsoF02B
2015 5-Year Average 10-Year Average
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
SSHE: Tyler
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 29, 2016
SSHE: Tyler
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
01 15XOMECO-Safety.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 01alsoS37A
(incidents per 200,000 work hours)
ExxonMobil Workforce(1) U.S. Petroleum Industry Benchmark(2)
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
008 102006 07 09 11 1312 14 2015
(1) Employees and contractors. Includes XTO Energy Inc. data beginning in 2011.(2) Workforce safety data from participating American Petroleum Institute companies (2015 industry data not available at time of publication).
DATA as of 01/25/2015:
2015 API data not availableuntil April/May timeframe
"XOM" "Benchmark"“06” 0.051 0.22“07” 0.048 0.19“08” 0.051 0.18“09” 0.041 0.12“10” 0.038 0.13"11" 0.077 0.12“12” 0.046 0.11“13” 0.044 0.12“14” 0.031 0.11“15” 0.034
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30Benchmark
XOM
“15”“14”“13”“12”11“10”“09”“08”“07”“06”
Lost-Time Injuries and Illnesses Rate:
!CHART
IS IN
BOTHSAR and EOC
1. Safety and Operations Integrity
• Leading safety performance; results are a leading indicator of business performance and underscore safety as a core value
How did we perform?
Safety and ROCE | Shareholder Returns | Free Cash Flow and Shareholder Distributions | Strategic Business Results
2. Return on Average Capital Employed (ROCE)(3)
• Balanced and highly competitive portfolio of resources, assets, and products in each business segment, resulting in industry-leading ROCE
(1) Employees and contractors; includes XTO Energy Inc. data beginning in 2011.
F1-P6
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
How did we perform? Safety and ROCE
Industry-leading performance across companies within the oil and gas industry of similar scale and complexity formed the basis for compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2015
25
20
15
10
5
0
–5ExxonMobil ShellChevron BPTotal
(percent)
"2015" "11-15" "06-15""Exxon" 7.9 18.2 22.7"Chevron" 2.4 13.4 16.6"Shell" 2.2 9.4 12.5"Total" 4.3 8.3 11.1 "BP" -2.5 7.7 10.2
DATA AS OF 02/12/2016
-5
0
5
10
15
20
2506-15
11-15
2015
BPTotalShellChevronExxon
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 28, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
02 14XOMECO-ROCE.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 02
!CHART
IS IN
BOTHFO and EOC
alsoF02B
2015 5-Year Average 10-Year Average
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
SSHE: Tyler
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 29, 2016
SSHE: Tyler
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
01 15XOMECO-Safety.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 01alsoS37A
(incidents per 200,000 work hours)
ExxonMobil Workforce(1) U.S. Petroleum Industry Benchmark(2)
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
008 102006 07 09 11 1312 14 2015
(1) Employees and contractors. Includes XTO Energy Inc. data beginning in 2011.(2) Workforce safety data from participating American Petroleum Institute companies (2015 industry data not available at time of publication).
DATA as of 01/25/2015:
2015 API data not availableuntil April/May timeframe
"XOM" "Benchmark"“06” 0.051 0.22“07” 0.048 0.19“08” 0.051 0.18“09” 0.041 0.12“10” 0.038 0.13"11" 0.077 0.12“12” 0.046 0.11“13” 0.044 0.12“14” 0.031 0.11“15” 0.034
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30Benchmark
XOM
“15”“14”“13”“12”11“10”“09”“08”“07”“06”
Lost-Time Injuries and Illnesses Rate:
!CHART
IS IN
BOTHSAR and EOC
1. Safety and Operations Integrity
• Leading safety performance; results are a leading indicator of business performance and underscore safety as a core value
How did we perform?
Safety and ROCE | Shareholder Returns | Free Cash Flow and Shareholder Distributions | Strategic Business Results
2. Return on Average Capital Employed (ROCE)(3)
• Balanced and highly competitive portfolio of resources, assets, and products in each business segment, resulting in industry-leading ROCE
(2) Workforce safety data from participating American Petroleum Institute (API) companies; 2015 industry data not available at time of publication.
F2-P6
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
How did we perform? Safety and ROCE
Industry-leading performance across companies within the oil and gas industry of similar scale and complexity formed the basis for compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2015
25
20
15
10
5
0
–5ExxonMobil ShellChevron BPTotal
(percent)
"2015" "11-15" "06-15""Exxon" 7.9 18.2 22.7"Chevron" 2.4 13.4 16.6"Shell" 2.2 9.4 12.5"Total" 4.3 8.3 11.1 "BP" -2.5 7.7 10.2
DATA AS OF 02/12/2016
-5
0
5
10
15
20
2506-15
11-15
2015
BPTotalShellChevronExxon
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 28, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
02 14XOMECO-ROCE.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 02
!CHART
IS IN
BOTHFO and EOC
alsoF02B
2015 5-Year Average 10-Year Average
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
SSHE: Tyler
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 29, 2016
SSHE: Tyler
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
01 15XOMECO-Safety.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 01alsoS37A
(incidents per 200,000 work hours)
ExxonMobil Workforce(1) U.S. Petroleum Industry Benchmark(2)
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
008 102006 07 09 11 1312 14 2015
(1) Employees and contractors. Includes XTO Energy Inc. data beginning in 2011.(2) Workforce safety data from participating American Petroleum Institute companies (2015 industry data not available at time of publication).
DATA as of 01/25/2015:
2015 API data not availableuntil April/May timeframe
"XOM" "Benchmark"“06” 0.051 0.22“07” 0.048 0.19“08” 0.051 0.18“09” 0.041 0.12“10” 0.038 0.13"11" 0.077 0.12“12” 0.046 0.11“13” 0.044 0.12“14” 0.031 0.11“15” 0.034
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30Benchmark
XOM
“15”“14”“13”“12”11“10”“09”“08”“07”“06”
Lost-Time Injuries and Illnesses Rate:
!CHART
IS IN
BOTHSAR and EOC
1. Safety and Operations Integrity
• Leading safety performance; results are a leading indicator of business performance and underscore safety as a core value
How did we perform?
Safety and ROCE | Shareholder Returns | Free Cash Flow and Shareholder Distributions | Strategic Business Results
2. Return on Average Capital Employed (ROCE)(3)
• Balanced and highly competitive portfolio of resources, assets, and products in each business segment, resulting in industry-leading ROCE
(3) Competitor data estimated on a consistent basis with ExxonMobil and based on public information. For definitions and more information, see page 44 of the Summary Annual Report included with the 2016 Proxy Statement.
F3-P6
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Industry-leading performance across companies within the oil and gas industry of similar scale and complexity formed the basis for compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2015
3. 10-Year Cumulative Returns(4)
• Superior relative returns through a range of economic environments and business cycles
• Maintaining leadership position despite industry downturn
ExxonMobil Industry Group Average(5) Brent Price(6)
(dollars per barrel)(percent)
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Cumulative Shareholder Returns:
12 201507 092006 08 10 11 13 14
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 29, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
03 15XOMECO-1-YrCmReturns.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 03
Ind Grp Avg XOM Brent“2006” 18.7 39.2 65.16“2007” 43.3 73.0 72.44“2008” 1.3 50.3 96.94“2009” 22.4 31.4 61.74“2010” 24.8 44.7 79.61“2011” 38.9 71.7 111.26“2012” 42.7 79.9 111.57“2013” 68.3 116.1 108.56“2014” 54.1 103.0 98.97“2015” 27.1 77.5 52.32
0
20
40
60
80
100
120XOM
Ind Grp Avg
“2015”“2014”“2013”“2012”“2011”“2010”“2009”“2008”“2007”“2006”0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Brent
“2015”“2014”“2013”“2012”“2011”“2010”“2009”“2008”“2007”“2006”
DATA AS OF 01/19/2016
4. Total Shareholder Return (TSR)(4)
• Leading the industry in TSR in all performance periods, most notably over time periods aligned with long investment lead times of our business
(percent)
ExxonMobil Industry Group Average(5)
30 Years20 Years10 Years5 Years1 Year 3 Years
15
10
5
0
–5
–10
–15
–20
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 10, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
04 15XOMECO-ShrhldrReturns.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
!CHART
IS IN
BOTHSFO, SAR and EOC
alsoC01B, S05DChart 04
DATA as of 01/19/2016
XOM Integrated
1 Year -12.6 -17.5
3 Years -0.4 -3.8
5 Years 4.2 0.4
10 Years 5.9 2.4
20 Years 9.7 7.2
30 Years 12 11.2
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
Integrated
XOM
30 Years20 Years10 Years5 Years3 Years1 Year
NOTE:
These numbers provided
on 1/19/2016 but still awaiting
numbers for FO/SAR version.
Carol
How did we perform?
Safety and ROCE | Shareholder Returns | Free Cash Flow and Shareholder Distributions | Strategic Business Results
Shareholder Returns
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Industry-leading performance across companies within the oil and gas industry of similar scale and complexity formed the basis for compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2015
3. 10-Year Cumulative Returns(4)
• Superior relative returns through a range of economic environments and business cycles
• Maintaining leadership position despite industry downturn
ExxonMobil Industry Group Average(5) Brent Price(6)
(dollars per barrel)(percent)
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Cumulative Shareholder Returns:
12 201507 092006 08 10 11 13 14
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 29, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
03 15XOMECO-1-YrCmReturns.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 03
Ind Grp Avg XOM Brent“2006” 18.7 39.2 65.16“2007” 43.3 73.0 72.44“2008” 1.3 50.3 96.94“2009” 22.4 31.4 61.74“2010” 24.8 44.7 79.61“2011” 38.9 71.7 111.26“2012” 42.7 79.9 111.57“2013” 68.3 116.1 108.56“2014” 54.1 103.0 98.97“2015” 27.1 77.5 52.32
0
20
40
60
80
100
120XOM
Ind Grp Avg
“2015”“2014”“2013”“2012”“2011”“2010”“2009”“2008”“2007”“2006”0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Brent
“2015”“2014”“2013”“2012”“2011”“2010”“2009”“2008”“2007”“2006”
DATA AS OF 01/19/2016
4. Total Shareholder Return (TSR)(4)
• Leading the industry in TSR in all performance periods, most notably over time periods aligned with long investment lead times of our business
(percent)
ExxonMobil Industry Group Average(5)
30 Years20 Years10 Years5 Years1 Year 3 Years
15
10
5
0
–5
–10
–15
–20
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 10, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
04 15XOMECO-ShrhldrReturns.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
!CHART
IS IN
BOTHSFO, SAR and EOC
alsoC01B, S05DChart 04
DATA as of 01/19/2016
XOM Integrated
1 Year -12.6 -17.5
3 Years -0.4 -3.8
5 Years 4.2 0.4
10 Years 5.9 2.4
20 Years 9.7 7.2
30 Years 12 11.2
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
Integrated
XOM
30 Years20 Years10 Years5 Years3 Years1 Year
NOTE:
These numbers provided
on 1/19/2016 but still awaiting
numbers for FO/SAR version.
Carol
How did we perform?
Safety and ROCE | Shareholder Returns | Free Cash Flow and Shareholder Distributions | Strategic Business Results
Shareholder Returns
(4) Cumulative (chart 3) and Annualized (chart 4) returns assuming dividends are reinvested when paid.
C3
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Industry-leading performance across companies within the oil and gas industry of similar scale and complexity formed the basis for compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2015
3. 10-Year Cumulative Returns(4)
• Superior relative returns through a range of economic environments and business cycles
• Maintaining leadership position despite industry downturn
ExxonMobil Industry Group Average(5) Brent Price(6)
(dollars per barrel)(percent)
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Cumulative Shareholder Returns:
12 201507 092006 08 10 11 13 14
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 29, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
03 15XOMECO-1-YrCmReturns.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 03
Ind Grp Avg XOM Brent“2006” 18.7 39.2 65.16“2007” 43.3 73.0 72.44“2008” 1.3 50.3 96.94“2009” 22.4 31.4 61.74“2010” 24.8 44.7 79.61“2011” 38.9 71.7 111.26“2012” 42.7 79.9 111.57“2013” 68.3 116.1 108.56“2014” 54.1 103.0 98.97“2015” 27.1 77.5 52.32
0
20
40
60
80
100
120XOM
Ind Grp Avg
“2015”“2014”“2013”“2012”“2011”“2010”“2009”“2008”“2007”“2006”0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Brent
“2015”“2014”“2013”“2012”“2011”“2010”“2009”“2008”“2007”“2006”
DATA AS OF 01/19/2016
4. Total Shareholder Return (TSR)(4)
• Leading the industry in TSR in all performance periods, most notably over time periods aligned with long investment lead times of our business
(percent)
ExxonMobil Industry Group Average(5)
30 Years20 Years10 Years5 Years1 Year 3 Years
15
10
5
0
–5
–10
–15
–20
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 10, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
04 15XOMECO-ShrhldrReturns.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
!CHART
IS IN
BOTHSFO, SAR and EOC
alsoC01B, S05DChart 04
DATA as of 01/19/2016
XOM Integrated
1 Year -12.6 -17.5
3 Years -0.4 -3.8
5 Years 4.2 0.4
10 Years 5.9 2.4
20 Years 9.7 7.2
30 Years 12 11.2
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
Integrated
XOM
30 Years20 Years10 Years5 Years3 Years1 Year
NOTE:
These numbers provided
on 1/19/2016 but still awaiting
numbers for FO/SAR version.
Carol
How did we perform?
Safety and ROCE | Shareholder Returns | Free Cash Flow and Shareholder Distributions | Strategic Business Results
Shareholder Returns
(4) Cumulative (chart 3) and Annualized (chart 4) returns assuming dividends are reinvested when paid.
C4
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Industry-leading performance across companies within the oil and gas industry of similar scale and complexity formed the basis for compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2015
3. 10-Year Cumulative Returns(4)
• Superior relative returns through a range of economic environments and business cycles
• Maintaining leadership position despite industry downturn
ExxonMobil Industry Group Average(5) Brent Price(6)
(dollars per barrel)(percent)
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Cumulative Shareholder Returns:
12 201507 092006 08 10 11 13 14
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 29, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
03 15XOMECO-1-YrCmReturns.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 03
Ind Grp Avg XOM Brent“2006” 18.7 39.2 65.16“2007” 43.3 73.0 72.44“2008” 1.3 50.3 96.94“2009” 22.4 31.4 61.74“2010” 24.8 44.7 79.61“2011” 38.9 71.7 111.26“2012” 42.7 79.9 111.57“2013” 68.3 116.1 108.56“2014” 54.1 103.0 98.97“2015” 27.1 77.5 52.32
0
20
40
60
80
100
120XOM
Ind Grp Avg
“2015”“2014”“2013”“2012”“2011”“2010”“2009”“2008”“2007”“2006”0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Brent
“2015”“2014”“2013”“2012”“2011”“2010”“2009”“2008”“2007”“2006”
DATA AS OF 01/19/2016
4. Total Shareholder Return (TSR)(4)
• Leading the industry in TSR in all performance periods, most notably over time periods aligned with long investment lead times of our business
(percent)
ExxonMobil Industry Group Average(5)
30 Years20 Years10 Years5 Years1 Year 3 Years
15
10
5
0
–5
–10
–15
–20
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 10, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
04 15XOMECO-ShrhldrReturns.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
!CHART
IS IN
BOTHSFO, SAR and EOC
alsoC01B, S05DChart 04
DATA as of 01/19/2016
XOM Integrated
1 Year -12.6 -17.5
3 Years -0.4 -3.8
5 Years 4.2 0.4
10 Years 5.9 2.4
20 Years 9.7 7.2
30 Years 12 11.2
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
Integrated
XOM
30 Years20 Years10 Years5 Years3 Years1 Year
NOTE:
These numbers provided
on 1/19/2016 but still awaiting
numbers for FO/SAR version.
Carol
How did we perform?
Safety and ROCE | Shareholder Returns | Free Cash Flow and Shareholder Distributions | Strategic Business Results
Shareholder Returns
(5) Chevron, Royal Dutch Shell, Total, and BP weighted by market capitalization; shareholder return data for Total available from 1992.
C3-b
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Industry-leading performance across companies within the oil and gas industry of similar scale and complexity formed the basis for compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2015
3. 10-Year Cumulative Returns(4)
• Superior relative returns through a range of economic environments and business cycles
• Maintaining leadership position despite industry downturn
ExxonMobil Industry Group Average(5) Brent Price(6)
(dollars per barrel)(percent)
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Cumulative Shareholder Returns:
12 201507 092006 08 10 11 13 14
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 29, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
03 15XOMECO-1-YrCmReturns.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 03
Ind Grp Avg XOM Brent“2006” 18.7 39.2 65.16“2007” 43.3 73.0 72.44“2008” 1.3 50.3 96.94“2009” 22.4 31.4 61.74“2010” 24.8 44.7 79.61“2011” 38.9 71.7 111.26“2012” 42.7 79.9 111.57“2013” 68.3 116.1 108.56“2014” 54.1 103.0 98.97“2015” 27.1 77.5 52.32
0
20
40
60
80
100
120XOM
Ind Grp Avg
“2015”“2014”“2013”“2012”“2011”“2010”“2009”“2008”“2007”“2006”0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Brent
“2015”“2014”“2013”“2012”“2011”“2010”“2009”“2008”“2007”“2006”
DATA AS OF 01/19/2016
4. Total Shareholder Return (TSR)(4)
• Leading the industry in TSR in all performance periods, most notably over time periods aligned with long investment lead times of our business
(percent)
ExxonMobil Industry Group Average(5)
30 Years20 Years10 Years5 Years1 Year 3 Years
15
10
5
0
–5
–10
–15
–20
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 10, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
04 15XOMECO-ShrhldrReturns.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
!CHART
IS IN
BOTHSFO, SAR and EOC
alsoC01B, S05DChart 04
DATA as of 01/19/2016
XOM Integrated
1 Year -12.6 -17.5
3 Years -0.4 -3.8
5 Years 4.2 0.4
10 Years 5.9 2.4
20 Years 9.7 7.2
30 Years 12 11.2
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
Integrated
XOM
30 Years20 Years10 Years5 Years3 Years1 Year
NOTE:
These numbers provided
on 1/19/2016 but still awaiting
numbers for FO/SAR version.
Carol
How did we perform?
Safety and ROCE | Shareholder Returns | Free Cash Flow and Shareholder Distributions | Strategic Business Results
Shareholder Returns
(5) Chevron, Royal Dutch Shell, Total, and BP weighted by market capitalization; shareholder return data for Total available from 1992.
C4-b
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Industry-leading performance across companies within the oil and gas industry of similar scale and complexity formed the basis for compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2015
3. 10-Year Cumulative Returns(4)
• Superior relative returns through a range of economic environments and business cycles
• Maintaining leadership position despite industry downturn
ExxonMobil Industry Group Average(5) Brent Price(6)
(dollars per barrel)(percent)
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Cumulative Shareholder Returns:
12 201507 092006 08 10 11 13 14
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 29, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
03 15XOMECO-1-YrCmReturns.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 03
Ind Grp Avg XOM Brent“2006” 18.7 39.2 65.16“2007” 43.3 73.0 72.44“2008” 1.3 50.3 96.94“2009” 22.4 31.4 61.74“2010” 24.8 44.7 79.61“2011” 38.9 71.7 111.26“2012” 42.7 79.9 111.57“2013” 68.3 116.1 108.56“2014” 54.1 103.0 98.97“2015” 27.1 77.5 52.32
0
20
40
60
80
100
120XOM
Ind Grp Avg
“2015”“2014”“2013”“2012”“2011”“2010”“2009”“2008”“2007”“2006”0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Brent
“2015”“2014”“2013”“2012”“2011”“2010”“2009”“2008”“2007”“2006”
DATA AS OF 01/19/2016
4. Total Shareholder Return (TSR)(4)
• Leading the industry in TSR in all performance periods, most notably over time periods aligned with long investment lead times of our business
(percent)
ExxonMobil Industry Group Average(5)
30 Years20 Years10 Years5 Years1 Year 3 Years
15
10
5
0
–5
–10
–15
–20
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 10, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
04 15XOMECO-ShrhldrReturns.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
!CHART
IS IN
BOTHSFO, SAR and EOC
alsoC01B, S05DChart 04
DATA as of 01/19/2016
XOM Integrated
1 Year -12.6 -17.5
3 Years -0.4 -3.8
5 Years 4.2 0.4
10 Years 5.9 2.4
20 Years 9.7 7.2
30 Years 12 11.2
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
Integrated
XOM
30 Years20 Years10 Years5 Years3 Years1 Year
NOTE:
These numbers provided
on 1/19/2016 but still awaiting
numbers for FO/SAR version.
Carol
How did we perform?
Safety and ROCE | Shareholder Returns | Free Cash Flow and Shareholder Distributions | Strategic Business Results
Shareholder Returns
(6) Annual data calculated as average of daily prices from U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).
C3-c
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
5. Free Cash Flow(7)
• Superior cash flow provides capacity for investments and shareholder distributions
• Generated $346.8 billion since 2006
6. Shareholder Distributions(8)
• Leading shareholder distributions through the cycle
• Distributed 54 cents of every dollar of cash flow generated from 2006 to 2015
Industry-leading performance across companies within the oil and gas industry of similar scale and complexity formed the basis for compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2015
"2015" "5-year avg" "10-year avg"“XOM” 6.5 19.7 34.7"CVX" -4.5 4.4 7.4“RDS” 7.8 13.6 10.9"TOT" -0.5 2.6 5.4“BP” 3 7.7 11.9
DATA AS OF 02/29/2016
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
3510-year avg
5-year avg
2015
“BP”TOT“RDS”CVX“XOM”
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
–5
(dollars in billions)
2015 5-Year Average 10-Year Average
ExxonMobil ShellChevron BPTotal
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 29, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
05 15XOMECO-FreeCashFlow.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 05
(yield, percent)
2015 5-Year Average
"2015" "5-year avg" "10-year avg""Exxon" 3.9 6.3 7"Chevron" 3.8 5 5.6"Shell" 4.6 4.7 5.4"Total" 2.4 5.1 5.2"BP" 5.8 5.5 5.9
DATA AS OF 02/12/2016
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0ExxonMobil ShellChevron BPTotal
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 28, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
06 15XOMECO-CashDistrbutYld.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 06
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
810-year avg
5-year avg
2015
BPTotalShellChevronExxon
10-Year Average
How did we perform?
How did we perform?
Safety and ROCE | Shareholder Returns | Free Cash Flow and Shareholder Distributions | Strategic Business Results
Free Cash Flow and Shareholder Distributions
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
5. Free Cash Flow(7)
• Superior cash flow provides capacity for investments and shareholder distributions
• Generated $346.8 billion since 2006
6. Shareholder Distributions(8)
• Leading shareholder distributions through the cycle
• Distributed 54 cents of every dollar of cash flow generated from 2006 to 2015
Industry-leading performance across companies within the oil and gas industry of similar scale and complexity formed the basis for compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2015
"2015" "5-year avg" "10-year avg"“XOM” 6.5 19.7 34.7"CVX" -4.5 4.4 7.4“RDS” 7.8 13.6 10.9"TOT" -0.5 2.6 5.4“BP” 3 7.7 11.9
DATA AS OF 02/29/2016
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
3510-year avg
5-year avg
2015
“BP”TOT“RDS”CVX“XOM”
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
–5
(dollars in billions)
2015 5-Year Average 10-Year Average
ExxonMobil ShellChevron BPTotal
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 29, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
05 15XOMECO-FreeCashFlow.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 05
(yield, percent)
2015 5-Year Average
"2015" "5-year avg" "10-year avg""Exxon" 3.9 6.3 7"Chevron" 3.8 5 5.6"Shell" 4.6 4.7 5.4"Total" 2.4 5.1 5.2"BP" 5.8 5.5 5.9
DATA AS OF 02/12/2016
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0ExxonMobil ShellChevron BPTotal
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 28, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
06 15XOMECO-CashDistrbutYld.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 06
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
810-year avg
5-year avg
2015
BPTotalShellChevronExxon
10-Year Average
How did we perform?
How did we perform?
Safety and ROCE | Shareholder Returns | Free Cash Flow and Shareholder Distributions | Strategic Business Results
Free Cash Flow and Shareholder Distributions
Competitor data estimated on a consistent basis with ExxonMobil and based on public information. (7) BP excludes impact of GOM spill, TNK-BP divestment, and 2013 Rosneft investment. For definitions and more information, see page 45 of the Summary Annual Report included with the 2016 Proxy Statement.
C5
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
5. Free Cash Flow(7)
• Superior cash flow provides capacity for investments and shareholder distributions
• Generated $346.8 billion since 2006
6. Shareholder Distributions(8)
• Leading shareholder distributions through the cycle
• Distributed 54 cents of every dollar of cash flow generated from 2006 to 2015
Industry-leading performance across companies within the oil and gas industry of similar scale and complexity formed the basis for compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2015
"2015" "5-year avg" "10-year avg"“XOM” 6.5 19.7 34.7"CVX" -4.5 4.4 7.4“RDS” 7.8 13.6 10.9"TOT" -0.5 2.6 5.4“BP” 3 7.7 11.9
DATA AS OF 02/29/2016
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
3510-year avg
5-year avg
2015
“BP”TOT“RDS”CVX“XOM”
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
–5
(dollars in billions)
2015 5-Year Average 10-Year Average
ExxonMobil ShellChevron BPTotal
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 29, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
05 15XOMECO-FreeCashFlow.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 05
(yield, percent)
2015 5-Year Average
"2015" "5-year avg" "10-year avg""Exxon" 3.9 6.3 7"Chevron" 3.8 5 5.6"Shell" 4.6 4.7 5.4"Total" 2.4 5.1 5.2"BP" 5.8 5.5 5.9
DATA AS OF 02/12/2016
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0ExxonMobil ShellChevron BPTotal
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 28, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
06 15XOMECO-CashDistrbutYld.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 06
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
810-year avg
5-year avg
2015
BPTotalShellChevronExxon
10-Year Average
How did we perform?
How did we perform?
Safety and ROCE | Shareholder Returns | Free Cash Flow and Shareholder Distributions | Strategic Business Results
Free Cash Flow and Shareholder Distributions
Competitor data estimated on a consistent basis with ExxonMobil and based on public information. (8) Total shareholder distributions divided by market capitalization. Shareholder distributions consist of cash dividends and share buybacks. For more information, see page 45 of the Summary Annual Report included with the 2016 Proxy Statement.
C6
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Industry-leading performance across companies within the oil and gas industry of similar scale and complexity formed the basis for compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2015
7. Strategic Business Results and Project Execution(9)
A. Upstream: Capital-Efficient Resource Developments
• Quality resource base, investment discipline, innovative designs, and superior project execution deliver a capital-efficient portfolio
• Start-up of 22 major projects since 2012, adding almost 1 million oil-equivalent barrels per day of working interest capacity, with plans to bring another 10 major projects online by 2017
• Leading track record of proved reserves replacement; replaced 115 percent since 2006
B. Downstream and Chemical: Value of Premier Integrated Businesses
• Generating superior results and solid cash flow through the cycle
• Full value-chain market view and integrated facilities enable more effective response to business environment
• 80 percent of refining capacity integrated with chemical or lube basestock manufacturing facilities
• Strategically investing at advantaged sites to enhance performance
C. Unparalleled Financial Flexibility
• Capacity to execute business strategy through the cycle
• Substantial flexibility to respond to opportunities
• Result of prudent financial management
• Unmatched access to capital on the most attractive terms
• Stable, attractive partner and capable investor of resources
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 29 7.09pm, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
07C 15XOMECO-TotalCapLevrg.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 07C
(Total Capitalization, dollars in billions) (10)
400
300
200
100
05 1510 2520
DATA AS OF 02/29 7pm/2016
Total Cap Leverage
XOM 359 9.75
CVX 197 13.96
Shell 174 15.66
Total 138 24.37
BP 125 23.3
0 5 10 15 20 250
100
200
300
400
Total Cap
ExxonMobil
Shell
Chevron
BPTotal
(Leverage, percent) (10)
How did we perform?
How did we perform?
Safety and ROCE | Shareholder Returns | Free Cash Flow and Shareholder Distributions | Strategic Business Results
Strategic Business Results
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Industry-leading performance across companies within the oil and gas industry of similar scale and complexity formed the basis for compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2015
7. Strategic Business Results and Project Execution(9)
A. Upstream: Capital-Efficient Resource Developments
• Quality resource base, investment discipline, innovative designs, and superior project execution deliver a capital-efficient portfolio
• Start-up of 22 major projects since 2012, adding almost 1 million oil-equivalent barrels per day of working interest capacity, with plans to bring another 10 major projects online by 2017
• Leading track record of proved reserves replacement; replaced 115 percent since 2006
B. Downstream and Chemical: Value of Premier Integrated Businesses
• Generating superior results and solid cash flow through the cycle
• Full value-chain market view and integrated facilities enable more effective response to business environment
• 80 percent of refining capacity integrated with chemical or lube basestock manufacturing facilities
• Strategically investing at advantaged sites to enhance performance
C. Unparalleled Financial Flexibility
• Capacity to execute business strategy through the cycle
• Substantial flexibility to respond to opportunities
• Result of prudent financial management
• Unmatched access to capital on the most attractive terms
• Stable, attractive partner and capable investor of resources
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 29 7.09pm, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
07C 15XOMECO-TotalCapLevrg.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 07C
(Total Capitalization, dollars in billions) (10)
400
300
200
100
05 1510 2520
DATA AS OF 02/29 7pm/2016
Total Cap Leverage
XOM 359 9.75
CVX 197 13.96
Shell 174 15.66
Total 138 24.37
BP 125 23.3
0 5 10 15 20 250
100
200
300
400
Total Cap
ExxonMobil
Shell
Chevron
BPTotal
(Leverage, percent) (10)
How did we perform?
How did we perform?
Safety and ROCE | Shareholder Returns | Free Cash Flow and Shareholder Distributions | Strategic Business Results
Strategic Business Results
Competitor data estimated on a consistent basis with ExxonMobil and based on public information. (9) More information on Strategic Business Results is included in the CD&A, see page 45.
C7-A
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Industry-leading performance across companies within the oil and gas industry of similar scale and complexity formed the basis for compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2015
7. Strategic Business Results and Project Execution(9)
A. Upstream: Capital-Efficient Resource Developments
• Quality resource base, investment discipline, innovative designs, and superior project execution deliver a capital-efficient portfolio
• Start-up of 22 major projects since 2012, adding almost 1 million oil-equivalent barrels per day of working interest capacity, with plans to bring another 10 major projects online by 2017
• Leading track record of proved reserves replacement; replaced 115 percent since 2006
B. Downstream and Chemical: Value of Premier Integrated Businesses
• Generating superior results and solid cash flow through the cycle
• Full value-chain market view and integrated facilities enable more effective response to business environment
• 80 percent of refining capacity integrated with chemical or lube basestock manufacturing facilities
• Strategically investing at advantaged sites to enhance performance
C. Unparalleled Financial Flexibility
• Capacity to execute business strategy through the cycle
• Substantial flexibility to respond to opportunities
• Result of prudent financial management
• Unmatched access to capital on the most attractive terms
• Stable, attractive partner and capable investor of resources
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 29 7.09pm, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
07C 15XOMECO-TotalCapLevrg.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 07C
(Total Capitalization, dollars in billions) (10)
400
300
200
100
05 1510 2520
DATA AS OF 02/29 7pm/2016
Total Cap Leverage
XOM 359 9.75
CVX 197 13.96
Shell 174 15.66
Total 138 24.37
BP 125 23.3
0 5 10 15 20 250
100
200
300
400
Total Cap
ExxonMobil
Shell
Chevron
BPTotal
(Leverage, percent) (10)
How did we perform?
How did we perform?
Safety and ROCE | Shareholder Returns | Free Cash Flow and Shareholder Distributions | Strategic Business Results
Strategic Business Results
Competitor data estimated on a consistent basis with ExxonMobil and based on public information. (10) Total Capitalization defined as “Net Debt + Market Capitalization”; and Leverage defined as “Net Debt / Total Capitalization.”
C7-B
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Industry-leading performance across companies within the oil and gas industry of similar scale and complexity formed the basis for compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2015
7. Strategic Business Results and Project Execution(9)
A. Upstream: Capital-Efficient Resource Developments
• Quality resource base, investment discipline, innovative designs, and superior project execution deliver a capital-efficient portfolio
• Start-up of 22 major projects since 2012, adding almost 1 million oil-equivalent barrels per day of working interest capacity, with plans to bring another 10 major projects online by 2017
• Leading track record of proved reserves replacement; replaced 115 percent since 2006
B. Downstream and Chemical: Value of Premier Integrated Businesses
• Generating superior results and solid cash flow through the cycle
• Full value-chain market view and integrated facilities enable more effective response to business environment
• 80 percent of refining capacity integrated with chemical or lube basestock manufacturing facilities
• Strategically investing at advantaged sites to enhance performance
C. Unparalleled Financial Flexibility
• Capacity to execute business strategy through the cycle
• Substantial flexibility to respond to opportunities
• Result of prudent financial management
• Unmatched access to capital on the most attractive terms
• Stable, attractive partner and capable investor of resources
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 29 7.09pm, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
07C 15XOMECO-TotalCapLevrg.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 07C
(Total Capitalization, dollars in billions) (10)
400
300
200
100
05 1510 2520
DATA AS OF 02/29 7pm/2016
Total Cap Leverage
XOM 359 9.75
CVX 197 13.96
Shell 174 15.66
Total 138 24.37
BP 125 23.3
0 5 10 15 20 250
100
200
300
400
Total Cap
ExxonMobil
Shell
Chevron
BPTotal
(Leverage, percent) (10)
How did we perform?
How did we perform?
Safety and ROCE | Shareholder Returns | Free Cash Flow and Shareholder Distributions | Strategic Business Results
Strategic Business Results
Competitor data estimated on a consistent basis with ExxonMobil and based on public information. (10) Total Capitalization defined as “Net Debt + Market Capitalization”; and Leverage defined as “Net Debt / Total Capitalization.”
C7-C
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Compensation program that rewards outstanding performance, promotes retention, and encourages long-term business decisions
Performance Differentiation
• Overall level of individual stock and bonus award grants is determined by the relative performance of the business
• Each executive’s total compensation is highly differentiated by individual performance [view chart]
Career Orientation
• Effective leadership results from broad range of experiences across the business cycle – CEO and other Named Executive Officers have career service
with ExxonMobil ranging from 23 to more than 40 years
• Focus on attracting and retaining best talent available for a lifelong career
• Requires a compensation program that promotes retention by delaying majority of annual compensation and placing it at risk of forfeiture
Succession Planning and Continuity of Leadership
• Strong belief that executive talent should be developed and promoted from within
• Continuity of leadership helps achieve critically important sustainable risk management
Design Objectives | Compensation Committee Decisions | Highest Performance Standards | Scale and Complexity
Design Objectives How do we link performance and pay?
Design Objectives
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Compensation program that rewards outstanding performance, promotes retention, and encourages long-term business decisions
Performance Differentiation
• Overall level of individual stock and bonus award grants is determined by the relative performance of the business
• Each executive’s total compensation is highly differentiated by individual performance [view chart]
Career Orientation
• Effective leadership results from broad range of experiences across the business cycle – CEO and other Named Executive Officers have career service
with ExxonMobil ranging from 23 to more than 40 years
• Focus on attracting and retaining best talent available for a lifelong career
• Requires a compensation program that promotes retention by delaying majority of annual compensation and placing it at risk of forfeiture
Succession Planning and Continuity of Leadership
• Strong belief that executive talent should be developed and promoted from within
• Continuity of leadership helps achieve critically important sustainable risk management
Design Objectives | Compensation Committee Decisions | Highest Performance Standards | Scale and Complexity
Design Objectives How do we link performance and pay?
Design Objectives
How do we linkperformance and pay?
Industry-Leading Performance in All 7 Key Areas:
• Safety and Operations Integrity
• Return on Average Capital Employed (ROCE)
• Total Shareholder Return (TSR)
• Free Cash Flow
• Shareholder Distributions
• Strategic Business Results
• Project Execution
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 19, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
08 15XOMECO-AwardMatrix.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
CEO
QuintileStock Award
Bonus
ManagementCommittee
Presidents
Executives
1100%
280%
350%
430%
50%
Performance
Pay
Gra
de Different awardby quintile and by pay grade
100% 80% 60% 50% 0%
Performance Award Matrix
8. Performance Criteria and Award Matrix
C8-DO
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
• Industry-leading performance over investment lead times of the business required in the following 7 key areas to achieve a top quintile bonus and long-term stock award:
- Safety and Operations Integrity
- Return on Average Capital Employed (ROCE)
- Total Shareholder Return (TSR)
- Free Cash Flow
- Shareholder Distributions
- Strategic Business Results
- Project Execution
• Experience and level of responsibility are also key factors in assessing the contributions of individual executives
• Tally sheets and pension modeling provide detailed information, by pay element, and allow for assessment against publicly available data for similar positions at comparator companies
Benchmarking
• Evaluation of level of compensation requires comparison against other U.S. companies that generally have large scale and complexity, capital intensity, international operations, and proven sustainability over time
• Assessment of business and individual performance requires comparison against companies of similar scale and complexity in the same industry
Design Objectives | Compensation Committee Decisions | Highest Performance Standards | Scale and Complexity
Compensation Committee Decisions
Compensation Committee Decisions
Chevron Royal Dutch Shell Total BP
AT&T Ford Motor Company Pfizer Boeing General Electric Procter & Gamble Caterpillar IBM United Technologies Chevron Johnson & Johnson Verizon
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
• Performance must be high in all 7 key areas for executive officers to receive an overall superior evaluation
– Outstanding performance in one area will not cancel out poor performance in another
• Annual performance assessment through well-defined process, covering executive officers and more than 1,700 executives worldwide across multiple business lines and staff functions
• Performance assessments are spread across 5 quintiles, each of which corresponds to an award level, widely differentiated between highest and lowest quintile
• Chart 8 illustrates distribution of stock and bonus awards by individual performance category (quintile) and pay grade, with awards for quintiles 2 through 5 expressed as a percentage of the highest quintile target
• All 21 executive officers are expected to perform at the highest level or they are replaced
• If it is determined that another executive would make a stronger contribution than the current officer, a succession plan is implemented and the incumbent is reassigned or separated
Design Objectives | Compensation Committee Decisions | Highest Performance Standards | Scale and Complexity
High Performance Standards
Highest Performance Standards
How do we linkperformance and pay?
Industry-Leading Performance in All 7 Key Areas:
• Safety and Operations Integrity
• Return on Average Capital Employed (ROCE)
• Total Shareholder Return (TSR)
• Free Cash Flow
• Shareholder Distributions
• Strategic Business Results
• Project Execution
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 19, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
08 15XOMECO-AwardMatrix.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
CEO
QuintileStock Award
Bonus
ManagementCommittee
Presidents
Executives
1100%
280%
350%
430%
50%
Performance
Pay
Gra
de Different awardby quintile and by pay grade
100% 80% 60% 50% 0%
Performance Award Matrix
8. Performance Criteria and Award Matrix
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
9. Scale of ExxonMobil vs. Benchmark Companies(1)
• Chart illustrates scale of ExxonMobil and each business segment on the basis of 2015 revenue
• All 3 business segments on a stand-alone basis would rank among other large companies based on revenue
• ExxonMobil far exceeds the median of compensation benchmark companies based on revenue (2.9x), market capitalization (1.8x), total assets (2.5x), net income (2.2x), and capital expenditures (8.5x)
• Furthermore, ExxonMobil is positioned between the 90th and 100th percentiles in each of these dimensions
• The Compensation Committee considers scale and complexity as relevant factors in assessing the appropriateness of pay levels
Design Objectives | Compensation Committee Decisions | Highest Performance Standards | Scale and Complexity
Scale and Complexity
ExxonMobil Downstream
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
March 02, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
09 15XOMECO-XOMvsBnchmrkCos.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 09
(2015 Revenue, dollars in billions)
ExxonMobil
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
0 1 20
1000
2000
3000
ExxonMobil ChemicalExxonMobil Upstream
XOM 2594.88 1Ford 1495.58 1AT&T 1468.01 1Verizon 1316.2 1Chevron 1299.25 1GE 1151.59 1Boeing 961.14 1IBM 817.41 1P&G 787.56 1J&J 700.74 1United 610.47 1Pfizer 488.51 1Caterpillar 470.11 1Downstream 2072.93 2Upstream 240.53 2Chemical 281.34 2
DATA AS OF 03/02/2016
Ford Motor Company
PfizerUnited TechnologiesJohnson & JohnsonProcter & GambleIBMBoeingGeneral ElectricChevronVerizonAT&T
Caterpillar
Scale and Complexity
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
9. Scale of ExxonMobil vs. Benchmark Companies(1)
• Chart illustrates scale of ExxonMobil and each business segment on the basis of 2015 revenue
• All 3 business segments on a stand-alone basis would rank among other large companies based on revenue
• ExxonMobil far exceeds the median of compensation benchmark companies based on revenue (2.9x), market capitalization (1.8x), total assets (2.5x), net income (2.2x), and capital expenditures (8.5x)
• Furthermore, ExxonMobil is positioned between the 90th and 100th percentiles in each of these dimensions
• The Compensation Committee considers scale and complexity as relevant factors in assessing the appropriateness of pay levels
Design Objectives | Compensation Committee Decisions | Highest Performance Standards | Scale and Complexity
Scale and Complexity
ExxonMobil Downstream
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
March 02, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
09 15XOMECO-XOMvsBnchmrkCos.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 09
(2015 Revenue, dollars in billions)
ExxonMobil
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
0 1 20
1000
2000
3000
ExxonMobil ChemicalExxonMobil Upstream
XOM 2594.88 1Ford 1495.58 1AT&T 1468.01 1Verizon 1316.2 1Chevron 1299.25 1GE 1151.59 1Boeing 961.14 1IBM 817.41 1P&G 787.56 1J&J 700.74 1United 610.47 1Pfizer 488.51 1Caterpillar 470.11 1Downstream 2072.93 2Upstream 240.53 2Chemical 281.34 2
DATA AS OF 03/02/2016
Ford Motor Company
PfizerUnited TechnologiesJohnson & JohnsonProcter & GambleIBMBoeingGeneral ElectricChevronVerizonAT&T
Caterpillar
Scale and Complexity
How do we linkperformance and pay?
(1) Benchmark company data based on public information. Revenues represent the financial year ending in 2015, and include sales-based taxes and revenues from discontinued operations where disclosed. Intersegment revenues are excluded.
C9
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Three performance factors determine the annual bonus and focus executives on sustainable growth in shareholder value:
1. Size of annual bonus pool determined by a formula, aligned with change in annual earnings
Programs applied consistently for the past 14 years to all executives worldwide, including the CEO
2. Individual grant levels determined by business and individual performance [view chart]
3. Half of annual bonus delayed until cumulative earnings per share (EPS) reach a specified level; EPS threshold at $6.50 in 2014/2015
2015 bonus represents 9 percent of CEO’s reported pay and is down 35 percent versus 2014, in line with change in earnings in 2015
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
EDIT
OR Clark Fertitta • Investor Relations
Exxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TEN
TIO
N: O
WN
ER
Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VER
SIO
N AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 16, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
INFO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
10A 15XOMECO-EarningsChange.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 10A
Annual Percent Change in Earnings
Percent Change in Bonus Program
Two-Thirds(1)
(percent)
13 141204 082002 06 10 1103 0705 09 2015
Bonus ProgramExxonMobil Earnings
100
80
60
40
20
0
–20
–40
–60
Earnings Bonus"2002" -25 -20 88 65"2004" 18 10 43 25"2006" 9 7.5 3 0"2008' 11 10 -57 -40"2010" 58 40 35 30"2012" 9 5“2013” -27 -20“2014” -0.2 0“2015” -35
DATA as of 02/07/2016
-50
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
Bonus
Earnings
20152014“2013”201220102008'200620042002
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 28, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
10B 15XOMECO-EarnVsBonus.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 10
10. Change in Earnings vs. Change in Bonus Program
Bonus Program | Equity Program | CEO Compensation | CEO Pay vs. Benchmark Companies
Bonus Program How did we pay?
Bonus Program
How did we pay?
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Three performance factors determine the annual bonus and focus executives on sustainable growth in shareholder value:
1. Size of annual bonus pool determined by a formula, aligned with change in annual earnings
Programs applied consistently for the past 14 years to all executives worldwide, including the CEO
2. Individual grant levels determined by business and individual performance [view chart]
3. Half of annual bonus delayed until cumulative earnings per share (EPS) reach a specified level; EPS threshold at $6.50 in 2014/2015
2015 bonus represents 9 percent of CEO’s reported pay and is down 35 percent versus 2014, in line with change in earnings in 2015
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
EDIT
OR Clark Fertitta • Investor Relations
Exxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TEN
TIO
N: O
WN
ER
Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VER
SIO
N AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 16, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
INFO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
10A 15XOMECO-EarningsChange.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 10A
Annual Percent Change in Earnings
Percent Change in Bonus Program
Two-Thirds(1)
(percent)
13 141204 082002 06 10 1103 0705 09 2015
Bonus ProgramExxonMobil Earnings
100
80
60
40
20
0
–20
–40
–60
Earnings Bonus"2002" -25 -20 88 65"2004" 18 10 43 25"2006" 9 7.5 3 0"2008' 11 10 -57 -40"2010" 58 40 35 30"2012" 9 5“2013” -27 -20“2014” -0.2 0“2015” -35
DATA as of 02/07/2016
-50
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
Bonus
Earnings
20152014“2013”201220102008'200620042002
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 28, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
10B 15XOMECO-EarnVsBonus.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 10
10. Change in Earnings vs. Change in Bonus Program
Bonus Program | Equity Program | CEO Compensation | CEO Pay vs. Benchmark Companies
Bonus Program How did we pay?
Bonus Program
How did we pay?
(1) The purpose of the two-thirds adjustment is to mitigate the impact of commodity price swings on short-term earnings performance.
Two Thirds
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Three performance factors determine the annual bonus and focus executives on sustainable growth in shareholder value:
1. Size of annual bonus pool determined by a formula, aligned with change in annual earnings
Programs applied consistently for the past 14 years to all executives worldwide, including the CEO
2. Individual grant levels determined by business and individual performance [view chart]
3. Half of annual bonus delayed until cumulative earnings per share (EPS) reach a specified level; EPS threshold at $6.50 in 2014/2015
2015 bonus represents 9 percent of CEO’s reported pay and is down 35 percent versus 2014, in line with change in earnings in 2015
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
EDIT
OR Clark Fertitta • Investor Relations
Exxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TEN
TIO
N: O
WN
ER
Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VER
SIO
N AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 16, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
INFO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
10A 15XOMECO-EarningsChange.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 10A
Annual Percent Change in Earnings
Percent Change in Bonus Program
Two-Thirds(1)
(percent)
13 141204 082002 06 10 1103 0705 09 2015
Bonus ProgramExxonMobil Earnings
100
80
60
40
20
0
–20
–40
–60
Earnings Bonus"2002" -25 -20 88 65"2004" 18 10 43 25"2006" 9 7.5 3 0"2008' 11 10 -57 -40"2010" 58 40 35 30"2012" 9 5“2013” -27 -20“2014” -0.2 0“2015” -35
DATA as of 02/07/2016
-50
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
Bonus
Earnings
20152014“2013”201220102008'200620042002
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 28, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
10B 15XOMECO-EarnVsBonus.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 10
10. Change in Earnings vs. Change in Bonus Program
Bonus Program | Equity Program | CEO Compensation | CEO Pay vs. Benchmark Companies
Bonus Program How did we pay?
Bonus Program
How did we pay?
Industry-Leading Performance in All 7 Key Areas:
• Safety and Operations Integrity
• Return on Average Capital Employed (ROCE)
• Total Shareholder Return (TSR)
• Free Cash Flow
• Shareholder Distributions
• Strategic Business Results
• Project Execution
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 19, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
08 15XOMECO-AwardMatrix.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
CEO
QuintileStock Award
Bonus
ManagementCommittee
Presidents
Executives
1100%
280%
350%
430%
50%
Performance
Pay
Gra
de Different awardby quintile and by pay grade
100% 80% 60% 50% 0%
Performance Award Matrix
8. Performance Criteria and Award Matrix
C8-BP
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Three design principles in combination result in performance and risk profiles aligned with the returns of long-term shareholders:
1. Number of shares at grant determined by business and individual performance [view chart]
2. Value of shares at vest determined by share price at vest
3. Time between grant and vest aligned with investment lead times of the business
Vesting periods for senior executives far exceed typical three-year vesting that is common across most industries
• Stock awards vest 50 percent in 5 years from grant date and 50 percent in 10 years or retirement, whichever is later; these stock holding requirements are not accelerated upon retirement
• Better aligns with time frames over which business decisions affect long-term shareholder value
Bonus Program | Equity Program | CEO Compensation | CEO Pay vs. Benchmark Companies
Equity Program
Equity Program
Programs applied consistently for the past 14 years to all executives worldwide, including the CEO
Example – Stock Award Grant vs. Vest Period for CEO, assuming retirement in 2017
Performance criteria at grant allow ExxonMobil to have long vesting periods while maintaining a significant award performance basis
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 10, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
10C 15XOMECO-AwardVsVew.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 10C
2006 201607 08 09 10 2011 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2026
Awards GRANTED based on business and individual performance
Awards VEST valued at share price when vested
2006 201607 08 09 10 2011 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2026
Awards GRANTED based on business and individual performance
Awards VEST valued at share price when vested
How did we pay?
2015 stock award represents 67 percent of CEO’s reported pay; number of shares granted is consistent with 2014, reflective of ExxonMobil’s industry-leading performance in all 7 key areas over investment lead times of the business
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Three design principles in combination result in performance and risk profiles aligned with the returns of long-term shareholders:
1. Number of shares at grant determined by business and individual performance [view chart]
2. Value of shares at vest determined by share price at vest
3. Time between grant and vest aligned with investment lead times of the business
Vesting periods for senior executives far exceed typical three-year vesting that is common across most industries
• Stock awards vest 50 percent in 5 years from grant date and 50 percent in 10 years or retirement, whichever is later; these stock holding requirements are not accelerated upon retirement
• Better aligns with time frames over which business decisions affect long-term shareholder value
Bonus Program | Equity Program | CEO Compensation | CEO Pay vs. Benchmark Companies
Equity Program
Equity Program
Programs applied consistently for the past 14 years to all executives worldwide, including the CEO
Example – Stock Award Grant vs. Vest Period for CEO, assuming retirement in 2017
Performance criteria at grant allow ExxonMobil to have long vesting periods while maintaining a significant award performance basis
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 10, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
10C 15XOMECO-AwardVsVew.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 10C
2006 201607 08 09 10 2011 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2026
Awards GRANTED based on business and individual performance
Awards VEST valued at share price when vested
2006 201607 08 09 10 2011 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2026
Awards GRANTED based on business and individual performance
Awards VEST valued at share price when vested
How did we pay?
2015 stock award represents 67 percent of CEO’s reported pay; number of shares granted is consistent with 2014, reflective of ExxonMobil’s industry-leading performance in all 7 key areas over investment lead times of the business
Ref1
Industry-Leading Performance in All 7 Key Areas:
• Safety and Operations Integrity
• Return on Average Capital Employed (ROCE)
• Total Shareholder Return (TSR)
• Free Cash Flow
• Shareholder Distributions
• Strategic Business Results
• Project Execution
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 19, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
08 15XOMECO-AwardMatrix.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
CEO
QuintileStock Award
Bonus
ManagementCommittee
Presidents
Executives
1100%
280%
350%
430%
50%
Performance
Pay
Gra
de Different awardby quintile and by pay grade
100% 80% 60% 50% 0%
Performance Award Matrix
8. Performance Criteria and Award Matrix
C8-EP
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Bonus Program | Equity Program | CEO Compensation | CEO Pay vs. Benchmark Companies
CEO Compensation
11. Reported Pay
• Pay granted to CEO in 2015 is down 18 percent versus 2014
• Change reflective of industry downturn and resulting primarily from decrease in annual bonus and share price
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 28, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
11 15XOMECO-ReportedPay.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 11
DATA AS OF 01/19/2016
(dollars)
Total Reported Pay:
All Other Compensation
Salary Bonus Stock Awards
Change in Pension Value(1)(2)
Salary Bonus Stockbased Other Change
"2013" 2.717000 3.670000 21.254625 .496704 0
"2014" 2.867000 3.670000 21.420000 .455420 4.683892
"2015" 3.047000 2.386000 18.288000 .540291 3.036167
0
10
20
30
40Change
Other
Stockbased
Bonus
Salary
201520142013
$28,138,329
2013
$2,717,000
$3,670,000
$496,704
$21,254,625
$33,096,312
2014
$2,867,000
$3,670,000
$21,420,000
$455,420
$4,683,892
$27,297,458
2015
–18%
$3,047,000
$2,386,000
$18,288,000
$540,291$3,036,167
12. Reported Pay vs. Realized Pay
• Realized pay represents on average 47 percent of total reported pay over CEO’s tenure
• Delta results from large portion of reported pay in equity with long vesting periods
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 28, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
12 15XOMECO-ReportedVsReal.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 12
(dollars in millions)
Realized PayReported Pay
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
02006 07 08 09 10 11(3) 12 13 14 2015
30% 47% 32% 31% 49% 71% 39% 56% 55% 57%Realized Pay as a Percentage of Reported Pay:
Reported Pay Realized Pay"2006" 22440.8 6712.44"2007” 27172.3 12884.3"2008" 32211.1 10212.1"2009" 27168.3 8530.17"2010" 28952.6 14229.6"2011" 34920.5 24637.2"2012" 40266.5 15561.2"2013" 28138.3 15768.8"2014" 33096.3 18253.2"2015" 27297.5 15601.8
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
Realized Pay
Reported Pay
201520142013201220112010200920082007”2006
DATA AS OF 01/19/2016
CEO Compensation
How did we pay?
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Bonus Program | Equity Program | CEO Compensation | CEO Pay vs. Benchmark Companies
CEO Compensation
11. Reported Pay
• Pay granted to CEO in 2015 is down 18 percent versus 2014
• Change reflective of industry downturn and resulting primarily from decrease in annual bonus and share price
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 28, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
11 15XOMECO-ReportedPay.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 11
DATA AS OF 01/19/2016
(dollars)
Total Reported Pay:
All Other Compensation
Salary Bonus Stock Awards
Change in Pension Value(1)(2)
Salary Bonus Stockbased Other Change
"2013" 2.717000 3.670000 21.254625 .496704 0
"2014" 2.867000 3.670000 21.420000 .455420 4.683892
"2015" 3.047000 2.386000 18.288000 .540291 3.036167
0
10
20
30
40Change
Other
Stockbased
Bonus
Salary
201520142013
$28,138,329
2013
$2,717,000
$3,670,000
$496,704
$21,254,625
$33,096,312
2014
$2,867,000
$3,670,000
$21,420,000
$455,420
$4,683,892
$27,297,458
2015
–18%
$3,047,000
$2,386,000
$18,288,000
$540,291$3,036,167
12. Reported Pay vs. Realized Pay
• Realized pay represents on average 47 percent of total reported pay over CEO’s tenure
• Delta results from large portion of reported pay in equity with long vesting periods
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 28, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
12 15XOMECO-ReportedVsReal.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 12
(dollars in millions)
Realized PayReported Pay
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
02006 07 08 09 10 11(3) 12 13 14 2015
30% 47% 32% 31% 49% 71% 39% 56% 55% 57%Realized Pay as a Percentage of Reported Pay:
Reported Pay Realized Pay"2006" 22440.8 6712.44"2007” 27172.3 12884.3"2008" 32211.1 10212.1"2009" 27168.3 8530.17"2010" 28952.6 14229.6"2011" 34920.5 24637.2"2012" 40266.5 15561.2"2013" 28138.3 15768.8"2014" 33096.3 18253.2"2015" 27297.5 15601.8
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
Realized Pay
Reported Pay
201520142013201220112010200920082007”2006
DATA AS OF 01/19/2016
CEO Compensation
How did we pay?
For definitions of the terms “Reported Pay,” “Realized Pay,” and “Unrealized Pay” as used in this Overview, as well as a list of our compensation benchmark companies, see Frequently Used Terms link below. (1) Interest rate changes: from 2.5% for 2012 to 3.5% for 2013; to 3.0% for 2014; to 2.75% for 2015.
C11
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Bonus Program | Equity Program | CEO Compensation | CEO Pay vs. Benchmark Companies
CEO Compensation
11. Reported Pay
• Pay granted to CEO in 2015 is down 18 percent versus 2014
• Change reflective of industry downturn and resulting primarily from decrease in annual bonus and share price
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 28, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
11 15XOMECO-ReportedPay.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 11
DATA AS OF 01/19/2016
(dollars)
Total Reported Pay:
All Other Compensation
Salary Bonus Stock Awards
Change in Pension Value(1)(2)
Salary Bonus Stockbased Other Change
"2013" 2.717000 3.670000 21.254625 .496704 0
"2014" 2.867000 3.670000 21.420000 .455420 4.683892
"2015" 3.047000 2.386000 18.288000 .540291 3.036167
0
10
20
30
40Change
Other
Stockbased
Bonus
Salary
201520142013
$28,138,329
2013
$2,717,000
$3,670,000
$496,704
$21,254,625
$33,096,312
2014
$2,867,000
$3,670,000
$21,420,000
$455,420
$4,683,892
$27,297,458
2015
–18%
$3,047,000
$2,386,000
$18,288,000
$540,291$3,036,167
12. Reported Pay vs. Realized Pay
• Realized pay represents on average 47 percent of total reported pay over CEO’s tenure
• Delta results from large portion of reported pay in equity with long vesting periods
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 28, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
12 15XOMECO-ReportedVsReal.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 12
(dollars in millions)
Realized PayReported Pay
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
02006 07 08 09 10 11(3) 12 13 14 2015
30% 47% 32% 31% 49% 71% 39% 56% 55% 57%Realized Pay as a Percentage of Reported Pay:
Reported Pay Realized Pay"2006" 22440.8 6712.44"2007” 27172.3 12884.3"2008" 32211.1 10212.1"2009" 27168.3 8530.17"2010" 28952.6 14229.6"2011" 34920.5 24637.2"2012" 40266.5 15561.2"2013" 28138.3 15768.8"2014" 33096.3 18253.2"2015" 27297.5 15601.8
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
Realized Pay
Reported Pay
201520142013201220112010200920082007”2006
DATA AS OF 01/19/2016
CEO Compensation
How did we pay?
For definitions of the terms “Reported Pay,” “Realized Pay,” and “Unrealized Pay” as used in this Overview, as well as a list of our compensation benchmark companies, see Frequently Used Terms link below. (2) In 2013, the change in pension value was negative (-$6.24 million), but under SEC reporting rules, a negative change in pension value must be shown in the Summary Compensation Table as zero.
C12
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Bonus Program | Equity Program | CEO Compensation | CEO Pay vs. Benchmark Companies
CEO Compensation
11. Reported Pay
• Pay granted to CEO in 2015 is down 18 percent versus 2014
• Change reflective of industry downturn and resulting primarily from decrease in annual bonus and share price
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 28, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
11 15XOMECO-ReportedPay.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 11
DATA AS OF 01/19/2016
(dollars)
Total Reported Pay:
All Other Compensation
Salary Bonus Stock Awards
Change in Pension Value(1)(2)
Salary Bonus Stockbased Other Change
"2013" 2.717000 3.670000 21.254625 .496704 0
"2014" 2.867000 3.670000 21.420000 .455420 4.683892
"2015" 3.047000 2.386000 18.288000 .540291 3.036167
0
10
20
30
40Change
Other
Stockbased
Bonus
Salary
201520142013
$28,138,329
2013
$2,717,000
$3,670,000
$496,704
$21,254,625
$33,096,312
2014
$2,867,000
$3,670,000
$21,420,000
$455,420
$4,683,892
$27,297,458
2015
–18%
$3,047,000
$2,386,000
$18,288,000
$540,291$3,036,167
12. Reported Pay vs. Realized Pay
• Realized pay represents on average 47 percent of total reported pay over CEO’s tenure
• Delta results from large portion of reported pay in equity with long vesting periods
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 28, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
12 15XOMECO-ReportedVsReal.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 12
(dollars in millions)
Realized PayReported Pay
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
02006 07 08 09 10 11(3) 12 13 14 2015
30% 47% 32% 31% 49% 71% 39% 56% 55% 57%Realized Pay as a Percentage of Reported Pay:
Reported Pay Realized Pay"2006" 22440.8 6712.44"2007” 27172.3 12884.3"2008" 32211.1 10212.1"2009" 27168.3 8530.17"2010" 28952.6 14229.6"2011" 34920.5 24637.2"2012" 40266.5 15561.2"2013" 28138.3 15768.8"2014" 33096.3 18253.2"2015" 27297.5 15601.8
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
Realized Pay
Reported Pay
201520142013201220112010200920082007”2006
DATA AS OF 01/19/2016
CEO Compensation
How did we pay?
For definitions of the terms “Reported Pay,” “Realized Pay,” and “Unrealized Pay” as used in this Overview, as well as a list of our compensation benchmark companies, see Frequently Used Terms link below. (3) Exercised last stock options granted in 2001 that would have expired in 2011. No stock options granted since 2001.
C12B
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Bonus Program | Equity Program | CEO Compensation | CEO Pay vs. Benchmark Companies
CEO Pay vs. Benchmark Companies
13. Realized Pay vs. Benchmark Companies(4)
• CEO’s realized pay is below the median of benchmark companies for most of his tenure
• In 2014, CEO’s realized pay ranked 8 of 13
14. Realized and Unrealized Pay(4)
• CEO’s combined realized and unrealized pay over his tenure is at the 39th percentile of compensation benchmark companies
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 19, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
13 15XOMECO-RealVsBnchmrk.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 13
2006 07 08 09 10 11(3) 12 13 2014
ExxonMobil
Compensation Benchmark Company: HighestMedian
(dollars in millions)
80
60
40
20
0
DATA as of 02/07/2016: “XOM” “Comp Co Median” “Comp Co Max”“2006” 6712 13484 49012“2007” 12884 15446 68647“2008” 10212 13480 47557“2009” 8530 12563 30933“2010” 14230 19593 51757“2011” 24637 14343 68248“2012” 15561 21415 68443“2013” 15769 16189 40816“2014” 18253 21193 80862
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
“Comp Co Max”
“Comp Co Median”
“XOM”
“2014”“2013”“2012”“2011”“2010”“2009”“2008”“2007”“2006”
• With pension value and nonqualified deferred compensation included, the orientation is between the 38th and 74th percentiles, depending on the method of quantifying pension values
CEO Compensation
ExxonMobil CEO’s Tenure 2006 to 2014 Percentile Position
Realized Pay 26% 10 of 13
Combined Realized and Unrealized Pay 39% 8 of 13
How did we pay?
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Bonus Program | Equity Program | CEO Compensation | CEO Pay vs. Benchmark Companies
CEO Pay vs. Benchmark Companies
13. Realized Pay vs. Benchmark Companies(4)
• CEO’s realized pay is below the median of benchmark companies for most of his tenure
• In 2014, CEO’s realized pay ranked 8 of 13
14. Realized and Unrealized Pay(4)
• CEO’s combined realized and unrealized pay over his tenure is at the 39th percentile of compensation benchmark companies
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 19, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
13 15XOMECO-RealVsBnchmrk.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 13
2006 07 08 09 10 11(3) 12 13 2014
ExxonMobil
Compensation Benchmark Company: HighestMedian
(dollars in millions)
80
60
40
20
0
DATA as of 02/07/2016: “XOM” “Comp Co Median” “Comp Co Max”“2006” 6712 13484 49012“2007” 12884 15446 68647“2008” 10212 13480 47557“2009” 8530 12563 30933“2010” 14230 19593 51757“2011” 24637 14343 68248“2012” 15561 21415 68443“2013” 15769 16189 40816“2014” 18253 21193 80862
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
“Comp Co Max”
“Comp Co Median”
“XOM”
“2014”“2013”“2012”“2011”“2010”“2009”“2008”“2007”“2006”
• With pension value and nonqualified deferred compensation included, the orientation is between the 38th and 74th percentiles, depending on the method of quantifying pension values
CEO Compensation
ExxonMobil CEO’s Tenure 2006 to 2014 Percentile Position
Realized Pay 26% 10 of 13
Combined Realized and Unrealized Pay 39% 8 of 13
How did we pay?
For definitions of the terms “Reported Pay,” “Realized Pay,” and “Unrealized Pay” as used in this Overview, as well as a list of our compensation benchmark companies, see Frequently Used Terms link below. (4) 2015 benchmark company data not available at time of publication.
C13
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Bonus Program | Equity Program | CEO Compensation | CEO Pay vs. Benchmark Companies
CEO Pay vs. Benchmark Companies
13. Realized Pay vs. Benchmark Companies(4)
• CEO’s realized pay is below the median of benchmark companies for most of his tenure
• In 2014, CEO’s realized pay ranked 8 of 13
14. Realized and Unrealized Pay(4)
• CEO’s combined realized and unrealized pay over his tenure is at the 39th percentile of compensation benchmark companies
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 19, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
13 15XOMECO-RealVsBnchmrk.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 13
2006 07 08 09 10 11(3) 12 13 2014
ExxonMobil
Compensation Benchmark Company: HighestMedian
(dollars in millions)
80
60
40
20
0
DATA as of 02/07/2016: “XOM” “Comp Co Median” “Comp Co Max”“2006” 6712 13484 49012“2007” 12884 15446 68647“2008” 10212 13480 47557“2009” 8530 12563 30933“2010” 14230 19593 51757“2011” 24637 14343 68248“2012” 15561 21415 68443“2013” 15769 16189 40816“2014” 18253 21193 80862
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
“Comp Co Max”
“Comp Co Median”
“XOM”
“2014”“2013”“2012”“2011”“2010”“2009”“2008”“2007”“2006”
• With pension value and nonqualified deferred compensation included, the orientation is between the 38th and 74th percentiles, depending on the method of quantifying pension values
CEO Compensation
ExxonMobil CEO’s Tenure 2006 to 2014 Percentile Position
Realized Pay 26% 10 of 13
Combined Realized and Unrealized Pay 39% 8 of 13
How did we pay?
For definitions of the terms “Reported Pay,” “Realized Pay,” and “Unrealized Pay” as used in this Overview, as well as a list of our compensation benchmark companies, see Frequently Used Terms link below. (4) 2015 benchmark company data not available at time of publication.
C14
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Bonus Program | Equity Program | CEO Compensation | CEO Pay vs. Benchmark Companies
CEO Pay vs. Benchmark Companies
13. Realized Pay vs. Benchmark Companies(4)
• CEO’s realized pay is below the median of benchmark companies for most of his tenure
• In 2014, CEO’s realized pay ranked 8 of 13
14. Realized and Unrealized Pay(4)
• CEO’s combined realized and unrealized pay over his tenure is at the 39th percentile of compensation benchmark companies
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 19, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
13 15XOMECO-RealVsBnchmrk.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 13
2006 07 08 09 10 11(3) 12 13 2014
ExxonMobil
Compensation Benchmark Company: HighestMedian
(dollars in millions)
80
60
40
20
0
DATA as of 02/07/2016: “XOM” “Comp Co Median” “Comp Co Max”“2006” 6712 13484 49012“2007” 12884 15446 68647“2008” 10212 13480 47557“2009” 8530 12563 30933“2010” 14230 19593 51757“2011” 24637 14343 68248“2012” 15561 21415 68443“2013” 15769 16189 40816“2014” 18253 21193 80862
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
“Comp Co Max”
“Comp Co Median”
“XOM”
“2014”“2013”“2012”“2011”“2010”“2009”“2008”“2007”“2006”
• With pension value and nonqualified deferred compensation included, the orientation is between the 38th and 74th percentiles, depending on the method of quantifying pension values
CEO Compensation
ExxonMobil CEO’s Tenure 2006 to 2014 Percentile Position
Realized Pay 26% 10 of 13
Combined Realized and Unrealized Pay 39% 8 of 13
How did we pay?
C14B
For definitions of the terms “Reported Pay,” “Realized Pay,” and “Unrealized Pay” as used in this Overview, as well as a list of our compensation benchmark companies, see Frequently Used Terms link below. (3) Exercised last stock options granted in 2001 that would have expired in 2011. No stock options granted since 2001.
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Resulting in extensive stock holding through the commodity cycle
Long Vesting Through The Cycle How do we manage risk?
15. Integration of Industry Environment and Compensation Program Design
• Chart depicts cumulative vested shares year on year, as compared to Brent price as an indicator of oil and gas industry performance
• Illustrates that a program with shorter term vesting enables an opportunity to monetize and diversify investment of realized pay at a much faster pace
• In this example, in 2013, on the eve of a greater than 50 percent crude price decline, an alternate formula-based program with three-year vest resulted in payout of 84 percent of awards granted versus ExxonMobil program where only 19 percent of awards granted had vested
ExxonMobil’s vesting periods far exceed competitors, are strongly integrated with our business model, and are aligned with long-term shareholder interests
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: O
WN
ER Data list is used to drive the black and
white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 18, 2016
G. Langston
FIL
E I
NF
O
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
15 15XOMECO-IntgrtIndComp.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 15
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200Formula
XOM
2624222018161412100820060
20
40
60
80
100
120
Brent
262422201816141210082006
Year Brent"2006" 65.16 72.44"08" 96.94 61.74"10" 79.61 111.26"12" 111.57 108.56"14" 98.97 52.32"16" "18" "20" "22" "24" "26"
Year XOM Formula"2006" 0 0 0 0"08" 0 0 0 200"10" 0 200 50 400"12" 100 600 150 675"14" 200 750 250 900"16" 300 900 350 900"18" 550 900 650 1100"20" 750 850 "22" 900 950 "24" 1000 1050 "26" 1100
DATA AS OF 01/19/2016
ExxonMobil(1) Alternate(2) Brent Price(3)
(number of vested shares) (dollars per barrel)
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
84%
19%
All awardsfully vested
2006 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 2507 09 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 2026
Long Vesting Periods
How do we manage risk?
Long VestingThrough The Cycle
Sound Governance Practices
Long Vesting and Investment Lead Times
Periodic Assessment of Program Design | | |
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Resulting in extensive stock holding through the commodity cycle
Long Vesting Through The Cycle How do we manage risk?
15. Integration of Industry Environment and Compensation Program Design
• Chart depicts cumulative vested shares year on year, as compared to Brent price as an indicator of oil and gas industry performance
• Illustrates that a program with shorter term vesting enables an opportunity to monetize and diversify investment of realized pay at a much faster pace
• In this example, in 2013, on the eve of a greater than 50 percent crude price decline, an alternate formula-based program with three-year vest resulted in payout of 84 percent of awards granted versus ExxonMobil program where only 19 percent of awards granted had vested
ExxonMobil’s vesting periods far exceed competitors, are strongly integrated with our business model, and are aligned with long-term shareholder interests
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: O
WN
ER Data list is used to drive the black and
white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 18, 2016
G. Langston
FIL
E I
NF
O
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
15 15XOMECO-IntgrtIndComp.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 15
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200Formula
XOM
2624222018161412100820060
20
40
60
80
100
120
Brent
262422201816141210082006
Year Brent"2006" 65.16 72.44"08" 96.94 61.74"10" 79.61 111.26"12" 111.57 108.56"14" 98.97 52.32"16" "18" "20" "22" "24" "26"
Year XOM Formula"2006" 0 0 0 0"08" 0 0 0 200"10" 0 200 50 400"12" 100 600 150 675"14" 200 750 250 900"16" 300 900 350 900"18" 550 900 650 1100"20" 750 850 "22" 900 950 "24" 1000 1050 "26" 1100
DATA AS OF 01/19/2016
ExxonMobil(1) Alternate(2) Brent Price(3)
(number of vested shares) (dollars per barrel)
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
84%
19%
All awardsfully vested
2006 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 2507 09 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 2026
Long Vesting Periods
How do we manage risk?
Long VestingThrough The Cycle
Sound Governance Practices
Long Vesting and Investment Lead Times
Periodic Assessment of Program Design | | |
In both programs, 100 shares are granted each year from 2006 to 2016. (1) ExxonMobil equity program: 50 percent of an annual grant of restricted stock or restricted stock units vests in 5 years and the other 50 percent vests in 10 years or retirement, whichever is later.
C15-a
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Resulting in extensive stock holding through the commodity cycle
Long Vesting Through The Cycle How do we manage risk?
15. Integration of Industry Environment and Compensation Program Design
• Chart depicts cumulative vested shares year on year, as compared to Brent price as an indicator of oil and gas industry performance
• Illustrates that a program with shorter term vesting enables an opportunity to monetize and diversify investment of realized pay at a much faster pace
• In this example, in 2013, on the eve of a greater than 50 percent crude price decline, an alternate formula-based program with three-year vest resulted in payout of 84 percent of awards granted versus ExxonMobil program where only 19 percent of awards granted had vested
ExxonMobil’s vesting periods far exceed competitors, are strongly integrated with our business model, and are aligned with long-term shareholder interests
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: O
WN
ER Data list is used to drive the black and
white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 18, 2016
G. Langston
FIL
E I
NF
O
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
15 15XOMECO-IntgrtIndComp.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 15
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200Formula
XOM
2624222018161412100820060
20
40
60
80
100
120
Brent
262422201816141210082006
Year Brent"2006" 65.16 72.44"08" 96.94 61.74"10" 79.61 111.26"12" 111.57 108.56"14" 98.97 52.32"16" "18" "20" "22" "24" "26"
Year XOM Formula"2006" 0 0 0 0"08" 0 0 0 200"10" 0 200 50 400"12" 100 600 150 675"14" 200 750 250 900"16" 300 900 350 900"18" 550 900 650 1100"20" 750 850 "22" 900 950 "24" 1000 1050 "26" 1100
DATA AS OF 01/19/2016
ExxonMobil(1) Alternate(2) Brent Price(3)
(number of vested shares) (dollars per barrel)
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
84%
19%
All awardsfully vested
2006 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 2507 09 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 2026
Long Vesting Periods
How do we manage risk?
Long VestingThrough The Cycle
Sound Governance Practices
Long Vesting and Investment Lead Times
Periodic Assessment of Program Design | | |
In both programs, 100 shares are granted each year from 2006 to 2016. (2) Hypothetical alternate formula-based program: percent of target shares that pay out depending on ExxonMobil’s relative three-year TSR rank versus our primary competitors: Chevron, Royal Dutch Shell, Total, and BP. TSR ranking has been determined by a Monte Carlo simulation that applies equal probability to each rank position. The Monte Carlo simulation method is consistent with U.S. GAAP accounting principles for valuing performance stock awards. Payout factors as follows: 200% of target if ranked 1; 150% of target if ranked 2; 75% of target if ranked 3; and 0% of target if ranked 4 or 5.
C15-b
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Resulting in extensive stock holding through the commodity cycle
Long Vesting Through The Cycle How do we manage risk?
15. Integration of Industry Environment and Compensation Program Design
• Chart depicts cumulative vested shares year on year, as compared to Brent price as an indicator of oil and gas industry performance
• Illustrates that a program with shorter term vesting enables an opportunity to monetize and diversify investment of realized pay at a much faster pace
• In this example, in 2013, on the eve of a greater than 50 percent crude price decline, an alternate formula-based program with three-year vest resulted in payout of 84 percent of awards granted versus ExxonMobil program where only 19 percent of awards granted had vested
ExxonMobil’s vesting periods far exceed competitors, are strongly integrated with our business model, and are aligned with long-term shareholder interests
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: O
WN
ER Data list is used to drive the black and
white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 18, 2016
G. Langston
FIL
E I
NF
O
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
15 15XOMECO-IntgrtIndComp.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 15
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200Formula
XOM
2624222018161412100820060
20
40
60
80
100
120
Brent
262422201816141210082006
Year Brent"2006" 65.16 72.44"08" 96.94 61.74"10" 79.61 111.26"12" 111.57 108.56"14" 98.97 52.32"16" "18" "20" "22" "24" "26"
Year XOM Formula"2006" 0 0 0 0"08" 0 0 0 200"10" 0 200 50 400"12" 100 600 150 675"14" 200 750 250 900"16" 300 900 350 900"18" 550 900 650 1100"20" 750 850 "22" 900 950 "24" 1000 1050 "26" 1100
DATA AS OF 01/19/2016
ExxonMobil(1) Alternate(2) Brent Price(3)
(number of vested shares) (dollars per barrel)
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
84%
19%
All awardsfully vested
2006 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 2507 09 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 2026
Long Vesting Periods
How do we manage risk?
Long VestingThrough The Cycle
Sound Governance Practices
Long Vesting and Investment Lead Times
Periodic Assessment of Program Design | | |
(3) Annual data calculated as average of daily prices from U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).
C15-c
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Long Vesting and Investment Lead Times
Reflective of long investment lead times and well aligned with ExxonMobil’s business model
Long Vesting Periods
ExxonMobil’s vesting periods far exceed competitors, are strongly integrated with our business model, and are aligned with long-term shareholder interests
16. Integration of Project Net Cash Flow and Compensation Program Design
• Chart depicts frequency and pace of vested shares each year, as compared to typical net cash flow of a major ExxonMobil project
• Illustrates high degree of variability and earlier payout of an alternate formula-based program, which is not aligned with the impact of project decisions spanning a longer period of time
• In this example, assuming retirement in 2017, the majority of ExxonMobil awards remain unvested, thus holding the executive accountable many years in the future for business decisions made 12 years prior
Year XOM Alternative“2005” 0 0"2006" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200"2010" 0 0 50 200 50 200 50 75 50 75"2015" 50 150 50 0 50 0 200 0 100 200"2020" 100 0 100 0 50 0 50 0 50 0 50 0"2026" 50 0
Year Project Cash Flow“2005” -19"2006" -149 -881 -2119 -2121"2010" -990 308 771 976 958"2015" 1156 1249 1297 1307 1105"2020" 1041 1057 1103 1118 1124 1120"2026" 1120
DATA as of 01/23/2014:
-500
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300Alternative
XOM
20262020201520102006
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 28, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
16 15XOMECO-Integration.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 16
1.5
1.0
0.5
0
–0.5
–1.0
–1.5
–2.0
–2.5
300
200
100
0
(number of vested shares)
ExxonMobil(1) Alternate(2)
(dollars in billions)
Project Net Cash Flow
-2500
-2000
-1500
-1000
-500
0
500
1000
1500
Project Cash Flow
20262020201520102006
2006 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 2507 09 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 2026
How do we manage risk?
Long VestingThrough The Cycle
Sound Governance Practices
Long Vesting and Investment Lead Times
Periodic Assessment of Program Design | | |
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Long Vesting and Investment Lead Times
Reflective of long investment lead times and well aligned with ExxonMobil’s business model
Long Vesting Periods
ExxonMobil’s vesting periods far exceed competitors, are strongly integrated with our business model, and are aligned with long-term shareholder interests
16. Integration of Project Net Cash Flow and Compensation Program Design
• Chart depicts frequency and pace of vested shares each year, as compared to typical net cash flow of a major ExxonMobil project
• Illustrates high degree of variability and earlier payout of an alternate formula-based program, which is not aligned with the impact of project decisions spanning a longer period of time
• In this example, assuming retirement in 2017, the majority of ExxonMobil awards remain unvested, thus holding the executive accountable many years in the future for business decisions made 12 years prior
Year XOM Alternative“2005” 0 0"2006" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200"2010" 0 0 50 200 50 200 50 75 50 75"2015" 50 150 50 0 50 0 200 0 100 200"2020" 100 0 100 0 50 0 50 0 50 0 50 0"2026" 50 0
Year Project Cash Flow“2005” -19"2006" -149 -881 -2119 -2121"2010" -990 308 771 976 958"2015" 1156 1249 1297 1307 1105"2020" 1041 1057 1103 1118 1124 1120"2026" 1120
DATA as of 01/23/2014:
-500
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300Alternative
XOM
20262020201520102006
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 28, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
16 15XOMECO-Integration.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 16
1.5
1.0
0.5
0
–0.5
–1.0
–1.5
–2.0
–2.5
300
200
100
0
(number of vested shares)
ExxonMobil(1) Alternate(2)
(dollars in billions)
Project Net Cash Flow
-2500
-2000
-1500
-1000
-500
0
500
1000
1500
Project Cash Flow
20262020201520102006
2006 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 2507 09 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 2026
How do we manage risk?
Long VestingThrough The Cycle
Sound Governance Practices
Long Vesting and Investment Lead Times
Periodic Assessment of Program Design | | |
Footnote-D1
In both programs, 100 shares are granted each year from 2006 to 2016. (1) ExxonMobil equity program: 50 percent of an annual grant of restricted stock or restricted stock units vests in 5 years and the other 50 percent vests in 10 years or retirement, whichever is later.
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Long Vesting and Investment Lead Times
Reflective of long investment lead times and well aligned with ExxonMobil’s business model
Long Vesting Periods
ExxonMobil’s vesting periods far exceed competitors, are strongly integrated with our business model, and are aligned with long-term shareholder interests
16. Integration of Project Net Cash Flow and Compensation Program Design
• Chart depicts frequency and pace of vested shares each year, as compared to typical net cash flow of a major ExxonMobil project
• Illustrates high degree of variability and earlier payout of an alternate formula-based program, which is not aligned with the impact of project decisions spanning a longer period of time
• In this example, assuming retirement in 2017, the majority of ExxonMobil awards remain unvested, thus holding the executive accountable many years in the future for business decisions made 12 years prior
Year XOM Alternative“2005” 0 0"2006" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200"2010" 0 0 50 200 50 200 50 75 50 75"2015" 50 150 50 0 50 0 200 0 100 200"2020" 100 0 100 0 50 0 50 0 50 0 50 0"2026" 50 0
Year Project Cash Flow“2005” -19"2006" -149 -881 -2119 -2121"2010" -990 308 771 976 958"2015" 1156 1249 1297 1307 1105"2020" 1041 1057 1103 1118 1124 1120"2026" 1120
DATA as of 01/23/2014:
-500
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300Alternative
XOM
20262020201520102006
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 28, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
16 15XOMECO-Integration.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 16
1.5
1.0
0.5
0
–0.5
–1.0
–1.5
–2.0
–2.5
300
200
100
0
(number of vested shares)
ExxonMobil(1) Alternate(2)
(dollars in billions)
Project Net Cash Flow
-2500
-2000
-1500
-1000
-500
0
500
1000
1500
Project Cash Flow
20262020201520102006
2006 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 2507 09 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 2026
How do we manage risk?
Long VestingThrough The Cycle
Sound Governance Practices
Long Vesting and Investment Lead Times
Periodic Assessment of Program Design | | |
Footnote-D2
In both programs, 100 shares are granted each year from 2006 to 2016. (2) Hypothetical alternate formula-based program: percent of target shares that pay out depending on ExxonMobil’s relative three-year TSR rank versus our primary competitors: Chevron, Royal Dutch Shell, Total, and BP. TSR ranking has been determined by a Monte Carlo simulation that applies equal probability to each rank position. The Monte Carlo simulation method is consistent with U.S. GAAP accounting principles for valuing performance stock awards. Payout factors as follows: 200% of target if ranked 1; 150% of target if ranked 2; 75% of target if ranked 3; and 0% of target if ranked 4 or 5.
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Periodic Assessment of Program Design
The Compensation Committee periodically evaluates alternate long-term equity programs, including a methodology based on three-year relative TSR
• Charts 15 and 16 demonstrate that such a program enables a faster payout schedule, not aligned with the Company’s business model nor the interests of long-term shareholders [view charts]
• In confirming the design of our long-term equity program, the Compensation Committee took into consideration that:
– Long-term equity programs in which performance criteria apply to the vest date require greater line of sight and thus shorter vesting periods
– Earlier payout schedules entail a leveraged formula that could focus executives on short-term results at the expense of long-term sustainable growth in shareholder value
– ExxonMobil executives see a one-for-one change in compensation through share price, aligned with the experience of the long-term shareholder
– After retirement, ExxonMobil senior executives continue to have grants unvested, which are at risk of forfeiture for 10 years, and cannot be used as collateral for any purpose
A requirement to demonstrate leadership in all 7 key performance areas establishes a significant performance standard at grant which in turn allows ExxonMobil to maintain its uniquely long vesting periods
Periodic Assessment of Program Design
How do we manage risk?
Long VestingThrough The Cycle
Sound Governance Practices
Long Vesting and Investment Lead Times
Periodic Assessment of Program Design | | |
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
Periodic Assessment of Program Design
The Compensation Committee periodically evaluates alternate long-term equity programs, including a methodology based on three-year relative TSR
• Charts 15 and 16 demonstrate that such a program enables a faster payout schedule, not aligned with the Company’s business model nor the interests of long-term shareholders [view charts]
• In confirming the design of our long-term equity program, the Compensation Committee took into consideration that:
– Long-term equity programs in which performance criteria apply to the vest date require greater line of sight and thus shorter vesting periods
– Earlier payout schedules entail a leveraged formula that could focus executives on short-term results at the expense of long-term sustainable growth in shareholder value
– ExxonMobil executives see a one-for-one change in compensation through share price, aligned with the experience of the long-term shareholder
– After retirement, ExxonMobil senior executives continue to have grants unvested, which are at risk of forfeiture for 10 years, and cannot be used as collateral for any purpose
A requirement to demonstrate leadership in all 7 key performance areas establishes a significant performance standard at grant which in turn allows ExxonMobil to maintain its uniquely long vesting periods
Periodic Assessment of Program Design
How do we manage risk?
Long VestingThrough The Cycle
Sound Governance Practices
Long Vesting and Investment Lead Times
Periodic Assessment of Program Design | | |
15. Integration of Industry Environment and Compensation Program Design
• Chart depicts cumulative vested shares year on year, as compared to Brent price as an indicator of oil and gas industry performance
• Illustrates that a program with shorter term vesting enables an opportunity to monetize and diversify investment of realized pay at a much faster pace
• In this example, in 2013, on the eve of a greater than 50 percent crude price decline, an alternate formula-based program with three-year vest resulted in payout of 84 percent of awards granted versus ExxonMobil program where only 19 percent of awards granted had vested
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: O
WN
ER Data list is used to drive the black and
white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 18, 2016
G. Langston
FIL
E I
NF
O
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
15 15XOMECO-IntgrtIndComp.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 15
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200Formula
XOM
2624222018161412100820060
20
40
60
80
100
120
Brent
262422201816141210082006
Year Brent"2006" 65.16 72.44"08" 96.94 61.74"10" 79.61 111.26"12" 111.57 108.56"14" 98.97 52.32"16" "18" "20" "22" "24" "26"
Year XOM Formula"2006" 0 0 0 0"08" 0 0 0 200"10" 0 200 50 400"12" 100 600 150 675"14" 200 750 250 900"16" 300 900 350 900"18" 550 900 650 1100"20" 750 850 "22" 900 950 "24" 1000 1050 "26" 1100
DATA AS OF 01/19/2016
ExxonMobil(1) Alternate(2) Brent Price(3)
(number of vested shares) (dollars per barrel)
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
84%
19%
All awardsfully vested
2006 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 2507 09 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 2026
16. Integration of Project Net Cash Flow and Compensation Program Design
• Chart depicts frequency and pace of vested shares each year, as compared to typical net cash flow of a major ExxonMobil project
• Illustrates high degree of variability and earlier payout of an alternate formula-based program, which is not aligned with the impact of project decisions spanning a longer period of time
• In this example, assuming retirement in 2017, the majority of ExxonMobil awards remain unvested, thus holding the executive accountable many years in the future for business decisions made 12 years prior
Year XOM Alternative“2005” 0 0"2006" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200"2010" 0 0 50 200 50 200 50 75 50 75"2015" 50 150 50 0 50 0 200 0 100 200"2020" 100 0 100 0 50 0 50 0 50 0 50 0"2026" 50 0
Year Project Cash Flow“2005” -19"2006" -149 -881 -2119 -2121"2010" -990 308 771 976 958"2015" 1156 1249 1297 1307 1105"2020" 1041 1057 1103 1118 1124 1120"2026" 1120
DATA as of 01/23/2014:
-500
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300Alternative
XOM
20262020201520102006
CH
AR
TO
WN
ER NAME
G. Langston
AR
TB
OO
K Eric Whetstone • Whetstone Design studio/cell: 214-412-8000fax: [email protected]
ED
ITO
R Clark Fertitta • Investor RelationsExxon Mobil Corporation, Irving, TXOffice: 972.444.1135Cell: 832-803-4316 [email protected]
Carol Zuber-Mallison • ZM Graphics, Inc.studio/cell: 214-906-4162 • fax: [email protected]
Usage: Exclusive rights within ExxonMobil
AT
TE
NT
ION
: OW
NE
R Data list is used to drive the black and white chart, which is then used as a template for the color chart. Bars and lines are cut and pasted from the black and white template and are highly accurate. However, the color chart is NOT linked to the database and is NOT “driven” by the data; it is a piece of artwork buiilt by a human. Therefore, the editor needs to thoroughly proof the final artwork, not JUST the data list .
VE
RS
ION AS OF
APPROVED BY
Feb. 28, 2016
G. Langston
FILE
IN
FO
LAST FILE CHANGE MADE BY
16 15XOMECO-Integration.ai
Carol Eric Bill
IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
Chart 16
1.5
1.0
0.5
0
–0.5
–1.0
–1.5
–2.0
–2.5
300
200
100
0
(number of vested shares)
ExxonMobil(1) Alternate(2)
(dollars in billions)
Project Net Cash Flow
-2500
-2000
-1500
-1000
-500
0
500
1000
1500
Project Cash Flow
20262020201520102006
2006 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 2507 09 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 2026
C15-16 PU
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Footnotes | Frequently Used TermsNext
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home
How our program encourages the highest performance standards:
√ Keeps executives focused on delivering industry-leading results over long periods of time, aligned with the Company’s business model
√ Holds executives accountable for many years, extending well beyond retirement
√ Aligns the financial gains or losses of each executive with the experience of long-term shareholders
√ Supports retention and continuity of leadership by encouraging a career orientation
How our program discourages inappropriate risk taking:
√ Extensive stock holding requirement through total compensation that is heavily weighted towards the equity program with long vesting periods
√ Unvested stock awards and the delayed payout of half of the annual bonus are subject to forfeiture for resignation or detrimental activity, with no accelerated payout at retirement
√ Strong bonus clawback policy
√ No employment contracts, severance agreements, or change-in-control arrangements
√ Grant decisions based on share-denominated basis (versus price basis) reinforce risk/reward profile of our program
√ No guaranteed bonuses or additional grants to balance changes in value of prior grants
Our program is applied consistently to all executives, including the CEO
Sound Governance Practices
Sound Governance Practices
How do we manage risk?
Long VestingThrough The Cycle
Sound Governance Practices
Long Vesting and Investment Lead Times
Periodic Assessment of Program Design | | |
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous Next
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home Footnotes | Frequently Used Terms
Footnotes
How did we perform? Charts 1-4: (1) Employees and contractors; includes XTO Energy Inc. data beginning in 2011. (2) Workforce safety data from participating American Petroleum Institute (API) companies; 2015 industry data not available at time of publication. (3) Competitor data estimated on a consistent basis with ExxonMobil and based on public information. For definitions and more information, see page 44 of the Summary Annual Report included with the 2016 Proxy Statement. (4) Cumulative (chart 3) and Annualized (chart 4) returns assuming dividends are reinvested when paid. (5) Chevron, Royal Dutch Shell, Total, and BP weighted by market capitalization; shareholder return data for Total available from 1992. (6) Annual data calculated as average of daily prices from U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).
How did we perform? Charts 5-7: For the following footnotes, competitor data estimated on a consistent basis with ExxonMobil and based on public information. (7) BP excludes impact of GOM spill, TNK-BP divestment, and 2013 Rosneft investment. For definitions and more information, see page 45 of the Summary Annual Report included with the 2016 Proxy Statement. (8) Total shareholder distributions divided by market capitalization. Shareholder distributions consist of cash dividends and share buybacks. For more information, see page 45 of the Summary Annual Report included with the 2016 Proxy Statement. (9) More information on Strategic Business Results is included in the CD&A, see page 45. (10) Total Capitalization defined as “Net Debt + Market Capitalization”; and Leverage defined as “Net Debt / Total Capitalization.”
How do we link performance and pay? Chart 9: (1) Benchmark company data based on public information. Revenues represent the financial year ending in 2015, and include sales-based taxes and revenues from discontinued operations where disclosed. Intersegment revenues are excluded.
How did we pay? Formula: (1) The purpose of the two-thirds adjustment is to mitigate the impact of commodity price swings on short-term earnings performance.
How did we pay? Charts 11-14: For definitions of the terms “Reported Pay,” “Realized Pay,” and “Unrealized Pay” as used in this Overview, as well as a list of our compensation benchmark companies, see Frequently Used Terms [view page]. (1) Interest rate changes: from 2.5% for 2012 to 3.5% for 2013; to 3.0% for 2014; to 2.75% for 2015. (2) In 2013, the change in pension value was negative (-$6.24 million), but under SEC reporting rules, a negative change in pension value must be shown in the Summary Compensation Table as zero. (3) Exercised last stock options granted in 2001 that would have expired in 2011. No stock options granted since 2001. (4) 2015 benchmark company data not available at time of publication.
How do we manage risk? Charts 15-16: For both examples, and in both programs, 100 shares are granted each year from 2006 to 2016. (1) ExxonMobil equity program: 50 percent of an annual grant of restricted stock or restricted stock units vests in 5 years and the other 50 percent vests in 10 years or retirement, whichever is later. (2) Hypothetical alternate formula-based program: percent of target shares that pay out depending on ExxonMobil’s relative three-year TSR rank versus our primary competitors: Chevron, Royal Dutch Shell, Total, and BP. TSR ranking has been determined by a Monte Carlo simulation that applies equal probability to each rank position. The Monte Carlo simulation method is consistent with U.S. GAAP accounting principles for valuing performance stock awards. Payout factors as follows: 200% of target if ranked 1; 150% of target if ranked 2; 75% of target if ranked 3; and 0% of target if ranked 4 or 5. (3) Annual data calculated as average of daily prices from U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).
Reference
How did we perform?
Executive Summary
Previous
How do we linkperformance and pay?
How did we pay?
How do we manage risk?
Home Footnotes | Frequently Used Terms
Reported Pay is Total Compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table, except for years 2006 to 2008, where the grant date value of restricted stock as provided under current SEC rules is used to put all years of compensation on the same basis.
Realized Pay is compensation actually received by the CEO during the year, including salary, current bonus, payouts of previously granted Earnings Bonus Units (EBUs), net spread on stock option exercises, market value at vesting of previously granted stock-based awards, and All Other Compensation amounts realized during the year. It excludes unvested grants, change in pension value, and other amounts that will not actually be received until a future date. Amounts for compensation benchmark companies include salary, bonus, payouts of non-equity incentive plan compensation, and All Other Compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table, plus value realized on option exercise or stock vesting as reported in the Option Exercises and Stock Vested table. It excludes unvested grants, change in pension value, and other amounts that will not actually be received until a future date, as well as any retirement-related payouts from pension or nonqualified compensation plans.
Unrealized Pay is calculated on a different basis from the grant date fair value of awards used in the Summary Compensation Table. Unrealized Pay includes the value based on each compensation benchmark company’s closing stock price at fiscal year-end 2014 of unvested restricted stock awards; unvested long-term share and cash performance awards, valued at target levels; and the “in the money” value of unexercised stock options (both vested and unvested). If a CEO retired during the period, outstanding equity is included assuming that unvested awards, as of the retirement date, continued to vest pursuant to the original terms of the award.
Compensation Benchmark Companies consist of AT&T, Boeing, Caterpillar, Chevron, Ford Motor Company, General Electric, IBM, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Procter & Gamble, United Technologies, and Verizon. For consistency, CEO compensation is based on compensation as disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table of the proxy statements as of August 31, 2015.
Statements regarding future events or conditions are forward-looking statements. Actual future results, including project plans, schedules, and results, as well as the impact of compensation incentives, could differ materially due to changes in oil and gas prices and other factors affecting our industry, technical or operating conditions, and other factors described in Item 1A “Risk Factors” in our most recent Form 10-K. References to oil-equivalent barrels and other quantities of oil and gas herein include amounts not yet classified as proved reserves under SEC rules, but which we believe will ultimately be moved into the proved category and produced.
The term “project” can refer to a variety of different activities and does not necessarily have the same meaning as in any government payment transparency reports.
Frequently Used Terms
Please also read the footnotes contained throughout this Overview for additional definitions of terms we use and other important information.
Frequently Used Terms