Larsen & Toubro - Outthink 2017 (Strategy Case Competition) - Campus Winners
-
Upload
anupreet-choudhary -
Category
Business
-
view
70 -
download
2
Transcript of Larsen & Toubro - Outthink 2017 (Strategy Case Competition) - Campus Winners
Team: ShootingStars
L&T OutThink 2017
Juggling Hypercubes: long-term EPC Business Strategy for Hydrocarbon Sector
September 30th, 2017
This case is developed by L&T Institute of Project Management, Vadodara.All the recommendations related to the business problems, as mentioned in the case, has been given by team Shooting Stars from IIM Rohtak
Image: Pexels
Executive Summary & the Approach
1
Existing Business Model
Value & Goals
External Analysis Internal AnalysisSWOT
Business Level Strategy
Global Strategy
Arena Selection Model
Corporate level Strategy
Portfolio Contribution
Impact on Competitive Advantage
Human Leverage
Stra
tegy
Fo
rmu
lati
on
Stra
tegy
Im
ple
me
nta
tio
n
1
2
3 4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Approach Flow Chart
1
2
3
Source: Case study, Team analysis. In our analysis we have assumed that DGHE business is very much similar to LTHE business of L&T Group
BCG, SWOT and Porter’s Five Forces analysis suggests DGHE has a strong competitive positioning
Arena Selection Model suggests Middle East & North Africa as a first choice followed by South East Asia. PESTLE analysis suggest South East Asian countries as 1st Preference
DGHE’s contribution to DGHE has significantly increased. Its EBITDA margin is 6.8%
3
Outlining DGHE’s Strategy (2-6)Arena Selection Model (7-9)DGHE’s Contribution (10-13)
Source: L&T annual report
DGHE executes capital projects through EPC contracts. DGHE can leverage on its value proposition to gain a competitive advantage in a maturing industry…
2*We have assumed that the growth in orders of DGHE is similar to LTHE unit of L&T. SOURCE: L&T Annual report , Case study & Team analysis
1 Existing Business Model
EPC Contracts
offshore onshore
• Well-head platforms
• Process Platforms
• Modular Structures like living quarters, heavy jackets
• Subsea pipelines, brownfield
• Floating system & offshore drilling rigs
• Refinery expansion and revamping projects
• Gas treatment facilities
• Fertilizer projects
• Petrochemicals
• Cryogenic storage tanks and terminals
• Pipelines₹ 7,025.00 ₹ 6,133.00
₹ 3,029.00
₹ 12,392.00
₹ -
₹ 2,000.00
₹ 4,000.00
₹ 6,000.00
₹ 8,000.00
₹ 10,000.00
₹ 12,000.00
₹ 14,000.00
₹ 16,000.00
₹ 18,000.00
₹ 20,000.00
2015-16 2016-17
Growth in Orders of DGHE Subsidiary*
Domestic International
Source: Annual Report and Appendix 1
Pros: “Single Point Responsibility” ensures completion of
projects in schedule and budget Guarantees Competitive advantage to clientsCons: Over-aggressiveness w.r.t schedule leads to unfavorable
delays, and decline in quality No periodic assessment of costs and risk of not having
the skilled labor force to complete the project
2 Value Proposition and Goals
Can DGHE meet its goal and continue offering the customer value?
The recent increase in the orders is favorable, but we should alsolook into the cons of the business model to address the demand
DGHE
Suppliers
Competitors Complementors
Customers
PLAYERS: DGHE, DGHE’s existing client base, new clients, other
competitors, Co-opetitors (Potential Partners)
ADDED VALUE: Flawless project deliveries, state of the art
execution, top class safety, sharp focus on quality, huge experience
RULES: Usually projects are EPC contract based, risk is high
TACTICS: Excellent PTR, high available capacity, integration
SCOPE: Huge scope in emerging economies
Currently, DGHE is more focused on Indian subcontinentand nearby regions. Existing business model offers anexcellent leverage to venture into other economies
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015 2025 2035
OECD China India Other non-OECD Asia Africa Other
Following the prolonged downturn, the oil & gas industry is showing some signs of revival, oil prices are expected to rise and emerging economies will be the largest energy market …
3Source: Team analysis, BP global outlook 2017 . *scores based on team analysis
3 External AnalysisFive Forces Analysis*A region - based perspective
-2.5
-1.5
-0.5
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
4.5
5.5
1965-75 1975-85 1985-95 1995-05 2005-15 2015-25 2025-35
GDP(%) Primary energy(%) Energy Intensity(%)
Growth in GDP is expected to become stable, but growth in primary energy is expected to decline
Due to increase in energy efficiency, there’s aslowdown in primary energy requirements.The pace at which global energy intensitydeclines is projected to increase as China’seconomy rebalances and India leverage itsgrowth on favorable macro conditions
• China is expected to be the largestenergy market, but India will overtake itby the end of 2035. Africa, also will be agrowth market in a long term.
• DGHE should consider it expansion inthese countries to gain as an earlymover by leveraging its valueproposition
Energy Consumption by region
0
1
2
3
4
Bargaining Power ofBuyers
Bargaining Power ofSuppliers
Threat of New EntratnsThreat of Substitutes
Industry Rivalry
Middle East and North Africa Russian Common Wealth
South East Asia North America
• Industry attractiveness is more in middleEastern Countries
• South Asian countries are center ofattraction for DGHE
Advancement in technology has led to slow down in oil demand from industry and transport sector. DGHE should focus on diversification of its services…
4
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015 2025 2035
Industry Buildings Transport Non-Combusted
Production by region Consumption by region
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
1975 1985 1995 2005 2015 2025 2035
Gas Non-Fossils Oil Coal
There’s a supply -demand gap ofaround 4-5 millionbarrels per day.Majority of theconsumption isfrom Asia PacificRegion, America& Europe
Due to recent advancement intechnology, the share of primaryenergy has shifted from coal to non-fossils sources of energy. It’s a riskfor Hydrocarbon Engineering EPCfirms
Shares of Primary Energy Increase in energy efficiency has led to theslow demand in industry and transportsector
Total energy consumption by sector
Macro factors are not that favorable, because it’s maturing industry. Business diversification is required
Source: Team analysis, BP global outlook 2017
Immense amount of experience has led DGHE to gain a competitive advantage. BCG analysis suggests that pipelines and head platforms are most profitable project types for DGHE…
5
4 Internal Analysis: Building Blocks of Competitive Advantage
Competitive Advantage:• Differentiation• Cost effective
Superior Quality
Superior Efficiency
Superior Innovation
Superior Customer
Responsiveness
• In-house capabilities helps to deliver complete from design to build turnkeysolutions
• The business has repeatedly delivered, large, critical and complex projects,globally, by virtue of its customer focus & responsiveness, experienced &highly skilled human resources, world-class Quality & HSE practices andculture of excellence
BCG Matrix analysis for project types (Revenue Streams)*
Relative Position (Market Share)
Gro
wth
Rat
e
High Low
High
Low
Invest ?
Cash Cow Dog
• BCG analysis shows that businesses like well head platforms, subseapipelines, cryogenic storage tanks, pipelines are in “investment zone”
• DGHE should use its resource to leverage on these kind of projects
Source: Team analysis, Annual Report, EY business outlook
SWOT analysis, with a score more than 2.5, suggests that DGHE has a huge competitive advantage over its competitors…
6
5 SWOT Analysis: Strategic Factor Evaluation Matrix
External Factors Weight Rating Weighted Score
Threats
High growth rate of renewable sources 0.15 4.8 0.72
Sharp decrease in demand of coal 0.15 4.2 0.63
Projected closure of global refineries in Europe, OECD Asia, North America
0.10 3.5 0.35
Decrease in demand of oil due to use of non-combustibles 0.05 1.6 0.08
Increasing energy efficiency 0.05 1.2 0.06
Total Scores 1.00 3.79
Internal Factor Evaluation Matrix
External Factor Evaluation Matrix
Internal Factors Weight Rating Weighted Score
Weaknesses
Little presence in markets other than India, Middle East 0.20 4 0.8
Project assessment not as good as European companies
0.10 2.5 0.25
ROE is less according to Indian standards 0.10 2.0 0.2
Total Scores 1.00 4.03
Internal Factors Weight Rating Weighted Score
Strengths
Robust track record on project deliveries 0.15 5 0.75
Vast client base, covers almost all major players 0.15 4.8 0.72
Market leaders in capital intensive projects 0.15 4.8 0.72
Major Focus on Operational Excellence 0.10 4 0.4
Umbrella for huge range of services 0.05 3.8 0.19
External Factors Weight Rating Weighted Score
Opportunities
Projected substantial increase in import of LNG in China and Europe
0.15 4.8 0.96
large scale and low cost resources in Middle East, US, Russia
0.10 3.0 0.3
Projected decline in liquids supply, while demand increases for China, Asia, Europe
0.15 3.4 0.51
Slow increase in oil producing market in Brazil 0.05 1.6 0.08
Increase in energy consumption to generate power 0.05 2 0.1
SWOT Analysis suggests that odds are in favor of DGHE
Source: Team analysis, case study, annual report
Hydrocarbon industry is in mature stage. The business level strategy for DGHE should be more focused on deterring rivals and diversifying across economies…
7
6 Business level Strategy: for Maturing Industry
Strategy for Deterring Entry of Rivals
Product proliferation
Price Cutting
Maintaining Excess Capacity
Strategy to manage Rivalry
Price Signaling
Price Leadership
NonpriceCompetition
Capacity Control
Market Penetration
Product Development
Market Development
Product Proliferation
ProductsExisting
Mar
keti
ng
Segm
en
ts
New
New
Exis
tin
g
• By focusing on diversified range of products,DGHE can improve its competitive positioningand deter competitors from entering
• Dynamic price cutting for high margin productsand efficient cost structure will give acompetitive edge
• DGHE can maintain excess capacity bydeveloping well tested processes
• DGHE can go for a tit-for-tat price signalingcompetitive strategy
• DGHE can leverage over its experience, resourcesand capabilities to gain price leadership
• Right forecast of capacity will help DGHE inefficient budgeting
• Hydrocarbon segment has high EBITDAmargin – hence penetration should bedone
• Electrical & Automation in Hydrocarbonsegment – penetration may lead tocompetitive advantage
• Innovation can lead to new productdevelopment in EPC life cycle
Four Nonprice Competitive Strategies
Source: Team analysis, case study, annual report
South East Asian & North African Countries seem very attractive after Middle East Countries. DGHE should look for divestment in these countries…
8Source: Team analysis, case study, annual report BP energy outlook
6 Arena Selection Model
Oil consumption per capita (in tonnes)Trade flows worldwide (in million tonnes)
Most trade flows in this region
Huge consumption in Middle East, America and South East Asia
Arena selection model suggests, after taking 7 important parameters, Middle Eastern and North African countries for penetration, followed by South East Asian countries. Qualitatively, south Asian countries are preferred..
9Source: Team analysis, case study, annual report
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Track record RepeatableAvailability of
Projects
Customer Base PEST Analysis Risk Metrics Accessibility (CAGE) Availability ofResources
Middle East and North Africa Russian Common Wealth South East Asia North America Average Socre
Arena Selection Model – Analyze on different parameters and compare with the average
We can clearly see from the above model suggests Middle East, North Africa and South Asian Countries
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4Political
Economical
Social
Technological
Legal
Environmental
Middle East and North Africa Russian Common Wealth
South East Asia North America
Average
PESTLE ANALYSIS
After qualitative analysis, preference order of region where DGHE should penetrate: South Asian Countries > Middle East & Africa > North America
After selection of the market, DGHE should align its global strategy with its business strategy and core competency…
10
8 Global Strategy: How to concur the world?
Glo
bal
Str
ateg
y fo
r Su
pp
ly C
hai
n o
f O
il an
d G
as
Cost cutting: A diet for the overweight
Vertical Integration: One-Stop shop
New Revenue models: for future rewards
Consolidation: Increasing Concentration
New Service models: Design to value
• Cost cutting by making well tested process • Use improved tech and BIM to reduce leaks
• Collaboration to simplify contractor management • In-house equipment purchase – 30% cost reduction
• High leveraged capital structure • Focus more on OPEX and capitalize by parts
• Joint ventures to gain the competitive adv. • Merger and Acquisition to gain mkt. share
• Collaboration with other co-opetitors• Leverage on technology
Company Response Strategy
Diversification of Revenue Streams
Effective cost controls & Customer Service
Safety and Human Capital Investment
• Offer broad service range • Consolidate & Leverage existing business in UKCS• Emerging market opportunities such as Africa
and Asia
• Continuous Capital Expenditure & Technology investments to improve economies of scale and efficiency
• Reduce operational cost base utilizing innovative approaches (e.g. cut down wastage)
• Ensure project deadlines & service delivery timely
• Investment in Employee Health & Safety• Initiatives to ensure continuous supply of talent
pool• Adequate succession planning for senior
management
Overcoming the Barriers to Change
• Utilize integrated logistics policies to cut down project timelines
• Bespoke risk & asset management strategies to address capital allocation decisions.
• Effective communication strategies to understand employee & customer needs
• Training and human capital development
Source: Team analysis, case study, annual report
D&G corporate strategy has four key areas. D&G group subsidiaries should contribute to D&G’s portfolio by focusing on these 4 areas…
11
9 Corporate level Strategy: Four Key Areas
Strengthening execution and operational
efficiency
Business value unlocking Digitalization
Emphasis on improving Working capital
level
D&G Group
DGHE
Source: Team analysis, case study, annual report
DGHE’s contribution to D&G’s portfolio is very significant. There’s a substantial increase in orders & EBITDA margin but asset size has remained low…
12
10 Portfolio Contribution of DGHE to D&G
6%
10%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
2016 2017
Number of Orders % Contribution
• There’s a significant increase in the number oforders from around 15000 to 25000
• The percentage contribution to total portfoliohas also increased significantly from 6% in2016 to 10% in 2017
• Hydrocarbon segment’s EBITDA margin hasincrease significantly frim 0.5% to 6.8% in amatter of one year
• Such increase indicates that the portfoliocontribution of DGHE to the parent companyhas become significant
• Despite being a significant increase in EBITDAmargin, there’s no significant increase inAssets as such
• DGHE has achieved such a high EBITDAmargin by having a light asset base
D&G consolidated – Hydrocarbon order bookD&G consolidated – EBITDA Margin D&G consolidated – Assets
Source: Team analysis, case study, annual report
The Impact web shows that the there’s a huge impact of corporate level strategy on DGHE’s business. DGHE’s should effectively use human capital to gain competitive advantage …
13
5
2
3
4
Strengtheningexecution and
operationalefficiency
Business valueunlocking
Emphasis onimproving Working
capital level
Digitalization
The Impact Web
• High EBITDA margin from DGHE business is inline with the corporate strategy ofstrengthening operational efficiency and execution
• D&G is planning to divest some of its business to diversify. DGHE being a highEBITDA and low asset business, it’s highly unlikely of such case to occur
Leveraging Human Capital
Organizations deliver superior and sustainable value when they have:
Evolutionary Purpose
Spiritual Intelligence
Entrepreneurial Ability
Shared Tacit Knowledge
Trust Communication
DGHE should leverage on it’s strong human capital by creating a trust among the employees
Source: Team analysis, case study, annual report