KWANTLEN POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY ACCOUNTABILITY PLAN …
Transcript of KWANTLEN POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY ACCOUNTABILITY PLAN …
KWANTLEN POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY ACCOUNTABILITY PLAN AND REPORT
2012/13
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | i
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
1. Letter from the Board Chair and President ............................................................................ 1
2. Institutional Overview and Strategic Direction 2013 ............................................................ 3
2.1 Institutional Overview .................................................................................................. 3
2.2 VISION 2018: Kwantlen Polytechnic University Mission, Vision, Values,
Goals and Strategies .................................................................................................. 9
3. Planning and Operational Context ..................................................................................... 13
3.1 KPU’s Community Focus ........................................................................................... 13
3.2 Engagement with Our Communities ..................................................................... 15
Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 16
4. Alignment of KPU’s Goals and Objectives with AVED’s Objectives 2012/13 .................. 17
5. KPU’s Goals, Initiatives and Performance Measures ......................................................... 19
5.1 Quality .......................................................................................................................... 19
5.2 Relevance ................................................................................................................... 24
5.3 Reputation .................................................................................................................. 27
6. AVED Performance Measures with Targets and Results .................................................... 29
7. Financial Information ......................................................................................................... 35
7.1 Summary Financial Report 2012/13........................................................................ 35
7.2 Summary Financial Outlook 2013/14 – 2015/16 ................................................... 36
Appendix A: FTE Enrolment Report Year Ended March 31st, 2013 .......................................... 37
This page left intentionally blank.
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 1
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
1. Letter from the Board Chair and President
Letter from the Board Chair and President
July 19th, 2013 Board of Governors
Hon. Amrik Virk
Minister of Advanced Education
Province of British Columbia
P.O. Box 9059, STN PROV GOVT
VICTORIA B.C. V8W 9E2
Dear Minister Virk:
We are pleased to submit KPU’s institutional Accountability Plan and Report for 2012/13
to 2014/15 and affirm that, in accordance with KPU’s governance structure, the Board
Chair and the President/Vice Chancellor are accountable for achieving its objectives
and would be most pleased to answer any questions you might have about it.
You will note that KPU has “substantially achieved, achieved or exceeded” targets set for
2012/13 except in the FTE targets for areas for health and access programs. We have
implemented significant changes to both areas to ensure that we make solid progress
towards meeting those targets, as the numbers for health programs this past year already
indicate.
KPU serves the fastest growing region in BC, and one which offers fewer postsecondary
spaces per capita than elsewhere in BC, at a time when a looming shortage of skilled
and qualified workers is being projected.
KPU’s mandate as a polytechnic university aligns perfectly with the needs of many more
citizens to have access to affordable and quality higher education that will lead to
employment, and yet our domestic enrolments were essentially flat for 2012/13. We
obviously need to find ways to increase our activity for the people in our region,
especially in key areas that align with the BC Jobs Plan, and in keeping with our
polytechnic mandate.
We stand ready to serve the higher education of this region, which is so crucial to the
economy of BC. Our intent is explicitly stated in the nine goals contained within our
VISION 2018 Strategic Plan (section 2.2) and our three themes align well with the
objectives of the BC government: quality, relevance and capacity.
We look forward to working with you to achieve the goals of the government of BC,
especially as they relate to the social, cultural, and economic vitality of the South Fraser
region that we are proud to serve. We appreciate very much the support we receive
from the staff at AVED, and we look forward to continued productive working
relationships in the coming year.
Sincerely,
Gord Schoberg Alan Davis
Chair, Board of Governors President & Vice Chancellor
This page left intentionally blank.
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 3
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
2. Institutional Overview and Strategic Direction 2013
Institutional Overview and Strategic Direction 2013
2.1 Institutional Overview Figure 2.1
The Kwantlen Polytechnic University (KPU)
region comprises the Tsawwassen First
Nation, the City of Richmond, the
Corporation of Delta, the City of Surrey, the
City of White Rock, and the City and
Township of Langley, a total of 1,023 km2. It
has a population of 908,080 people,1 21% of
BC’s total population in 2011.
The region includes densely populated
urban regions, suburban neighbourhoods,
areas of heavy and light industry, and
working farms. The KPU region is home to three airports, three ports, six major highways, three rail
systems, three international border crossings, and the majority of Metro Vancouver’s warehouse
space and remaining industrial land.
Population in the Region KPU provides educational opportunities to the fastest
growing region of the province. Its regional
population increased 13% from 2006 to 2011. (See
Figure 2.2) This compares to 7% population growth in
the province in the same period. Thirty-seven
percent of the province’s overall population growth
in this five-year period was in KPU’s region.2
Four-fifths of KPU’s students and 55% of its employees
live within the region.
The most recent population projections
prepared by BC Stats3 show that the KPU
region’s population will exceed a million
people by 2016.
The population of the KPU region is
projected to increase by 17% in the
decade between 2013 and 2023 while the
population of BC overall increases by 10%.
(See Figure 2.3)
1 Population counts, 2011 census, Statistics Canada 2 Population counts, 2006 and 2011 censuses, Statistics Canada 3 PEOPLE 2012, BC Stats September 2012
3,492,153
(79%)
3,310,565
(80%)
907,904
(21%)
802,922
(20%)
2006 Census 2011 Census
Figure 2.2: Population Growth in BC
and KPU Region
between 2006 and 2011
KPU
Region
Rest of BC
13%
15%
17%
10%
12%
15%
Total BC Metro
Vancouver
KPU Region
Figure 2.3: Projected Population Growth
2013 - 2033
2013 - 2023 2023 - 2033
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 4
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
2. Institutional Overview and Strategic Direction 2013
The number of 15 to 24 year olds in the KPU
region will drop over the next 15 years while
the number of 25 to 29 year olds will
increase.
Number aged 15 to 24 in the KPU region:
in 2013 – 123,927
in 2028 – 123,589
Number aged 25 to 29 in the KPU region:
in 2013 – 66,748
in 2028 – 70,711
Although the population in the KPU region is projected
to grow in the next twenty years, the number of 15 to 24
year olds is decreasing. By 2018, the number of 15 to 24
year olds will drop by 5%. This figure does not start to
increase until 2028, whereas the number of 25 to 49 year
olds will grow 9% by 2018. By 2033, the number of 25 to
49 year olds will have grown by 32% compared to 2013.
(See Figure 2.4)
Focus on Sustainability KPU has a long standing commitment to environmental sustainability. Over the past ten years the
University has made significant investments in reducing its energy consumption and its greenhouse
gas emissions. In 2012, KPU reduced its greenhouse gas emissions by 12.7%.
KPU’s concern for environmental sustainability issues is reflected in its buildings. The Cloverdale
campus, built in 2007, is KPU’s, and the City of Surrey’s, first LEED Gold certified building. Since then,
the Surrey Main Building expansion has been awarded LEED Silver, and Surrey’s three-story library is
LEED Gold certified.
This year KPU expanded its geothermal field at its Surrey campus; the field now provides heating
and cooling to recently constructed buildings and to the wing of the Library that was built in 1989.
KPU offers a number of degree programs focusing on sustainability; these include offerings in
science, urban agriculture/horticulture, and public policy.
- 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000
2013
2018
2023
2028
2033
2013 2018 2023 2028 2033
>1-14 154,068 161,060 171,935 183,719 193,471
15-19 57,646 55,876 58,130 60,720 64,561
20-24 66,281 61,383 60,800 62,869 65,635
25-29 66,748 72,359 68,770 68,793 70,711
30-39 121,141 143,725 163,103 166,618 164,486
40-49 133,312 133,954 145,938 170,004 190,021
50-59 132,335 143,507 146,435 148,351 160,448
60-69 100,272 114,558 134,557 145,813 148,431
70-90+ 113,102 134,561 155,136 180,986 209,266
Figure 2.4: Population Projections by Age Group for KPU Region
2013 – 2033
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 5
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
2. Institutional Overview and Strategic Direction 2013
KPU’s Campuses To accommodate the burgeoning population across this large and densely populated region
(950 persons per km2), KPU has four campuses: Richmond, Surrey, Cloverdale (Trades and
Technology), and Langley spread across 42km, as well as on-line and off-site course offerings. The
distribution of students by campus is shown in Figure 2.5.4
All KPU’s campuses have a retail bookstore,
cafeteria, learning centre, lounge areas and Wi-Fi
network service. The Richmond and Surrey
campuses have conference centres that are
heavily used for university and postsecondary
system events and are also used by community
groups. Most classrooms are equipped with
computers and digital projectors. Libraries on all
four campuses have computers, individual study
spaces, and small group study spaces for student
use.
The Richmond campus has 40 classrooms, and 25
laboratories: 4 computer labs, 15 science labs, a
psychology lab, 2 language labs, and 3 graphic
design computer labs; and 15 design studios.
In December 2012, KPU announced the creation of the Chip and Shannon Wilson School of
Design as the result of gifts from Chip and Shannon Wilson, lululemon athletica, and contributions
from the Province of BC and KPU. The new building is expected to open on the Richmond
campus in September 2015.
The Surrey campus is KPU’s largest and serves the largest number of students. It has 53 classrooms,
29 labs: 13 science labs, 15 computer labs, and a psychology lab; and 8 studios for Visual Arts. A
125-seat lecture theatre provides space for lectures and panel discussions, and a public art
gallery showcases installations by students and visiting artists. Surrey is the only campus with a
gymnasium and fitness center. An award winning Aboriginal Student Gathering space opened in
2010 supports the learning of Aboriginal students.
The Cloverdale campus has 20 classrooms, 4 computer labs, 5 simulation labs and 13 shops
dedicated to trades and technology skill development. The campus also has a fine arts studio for
upper division students. The only Farrier training program in BC’s public postsecondary sector is
delivered at KPU’s Cloverdale campus.
The Langley campus is home to the School of Horticulture’s field lab, greenhouses, technical
training shops and a three-hole demonstration golf course. The Institute of Sustainable Horticulture
has state-of-the-art research laboratories and a research greenhouse at Langley. In fall 2012, the
Faculty of Community and Health Studies relocated to the Langley campus following a $7 million
renovation to the South building of the campus.
The Langley campus has 36 classrooms, 5 computer labs, 7 labs supporting horticulture,
environmental protection technology, and general science programs as well as 6 labs and 4 high-
technology simulation labs for Nursing. A 250-seat auditorium for music rehearsals and concert
performances at the Langley campus is also made available to community groups for
competitions and performances. In addition, the Music department has specialized teaching
studios and individual practice rooms.
4 Unless otherwise noted, all data in this Overview are drawn from internal KPU datasets.
Cloverdale
4%
Langley
15%
Offsite
2%
Online
5%
Richmond
31%
Surrey
43%
Figure 2.5: Distribution of Enrolments
by Campus, Fall 2012
N=14,896 unduplicated
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 6
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
2. Institutional Overview and Strategic Direction 2013
KPU’s Students Total KPU enrolments have increased 13%
over the five academic years 2007/08 to
2011/12 (Figure 2.6). Increases in both
domestic and international student
enrolments have contributed to this
growth.
Reflecting the growth in the regional
population, KPU’s domestic enrolments
have grown steadily. In the last full
academic year 2011/12, 18,132 individual
domestic students enrolled in programs at
KPU. This is a 9% increase over 2007/08.
The number of international students at
KPU grew by 700 between academic
years 2007/08 and 2011/12, an 86%
increase. This demonstrates KPU’s efforts to
achieve the Ministry objective of
increasing international students in BC by
50%. More than half of KPU’s international students in 2011/12 were enrolled in programs in the
Faculty of Business, and 22% in the Faculty of Academic and Career Advancement.
KPU offers a wide array of courses
in all three terms each year.
Enrolments in the spring and
summer terms have increased
most. We attribute this to an
increasing number of students
who study part-time, likely also
working, throughout the year.
Summer 2012 enrolments
accounted for 16% of FTEs
generated in academic year
2011/12.
Two-thirds of all KPU students are
enrolled in programs in either the
Faculty of Business or the Faculty
of Arts. The growth in enrolment
from fall 2010 to fall 2012 was
greatest in the Faculties of
Community and Health Studies
(11%), Business (8%), and Arts (6%).
(See Figure 2.8 on the following
page.)
Forty-four percent of Arts students are taking General Studies, most at the Associate Degree level.
Thirty percent of Business students are taking Accounting, most at the BBA level. The majority of
students, regardless of Faculty, are studying part-time (i.e. taking fewer than 12 credits a
semester).
12,818
13,773
14,324
7,059
7,094
7,748
14,473
14,983
14,816
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000
2010 Spring
2011 Spring
2012 Spring
2010 Summer
2011 Summer
2012 Summer
2010 Fall
2011 Fall
2012 Fall
Figure 2.7: Unduplicated Headcount by Term
Spring 2010 – Fall 2012
16,597 16,695
17,495 17,705
18,132
809 967
1,226
1,396
1,502
AY2007/08 AY2008/09 AY2009/10 AY2010/11 AY2011/12
Figure 2.6: Unduplicated Domestic and
International Headcount by
AY 2007/08 – 2011/12
Domestic International
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 7
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
2. Institutional Overview and Strategic Direction 2013
Because students may take courses in Faculties other than the one they are enrolled in, the
distribution displayed in Figure 2.8 does not reflect the proportion of educational activity delivered
by each Faculty.
In academic year 2012/13, KPU students had a choice of one hundred and twenty-two programs
ranging from certificates of completion to post-baccalaureate diplomas in a wide range of
disciplines delivered by seven Faculties. Figure 2.9 shows the distribution of student enrolments by
credential level over each of the last three fall terms.
*Other credential: citation, statement of completion
Apart from the increase in students enrolled in baccalaureate programs and the increase in
international students, the profile of KPU’s student body has changed little over the past three
years. (See Figure 2.10 on the following page.)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Academic &
Career
Advancement
Arts Business Community
and Health
Studies
Design Science and
Horticulture
Trades and
Technology
Other
Figure 2.8: Distribution of Student Enrolments by Faculty
Fall 2010, 2011, and 2012
Fall 2010
N=14,136
Fall 2011
N=14,686
Fall 2012
N=14,553
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Associate
Degree
Baccalaureate
Degree
Certificate Certificate of
Completion
Diploma No credential Other
credential*
Figure 2.9: Distribution of Students by Credential Level
Fall 2010 , 2011, and 2012
Fall 2010
N= 14,473
Fall 2011
N-14,983
Fall 2012
N=14,816
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 8
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
2. Institutional Overview and Strategic Direction 2013
35%
30%
25%
62%
63%
63%
92%
93%
93%
80%
79%
76%
29%
32%
33%
32%
33%
33%
47%
47% 46%
48%
46%
40%
40%
65%
70%
75%
38%
37% 37%
8%
7%
7%
20%
21%
24%
71%
68%
67%
68%
67%
67%
53%
53%
54%
52%
54%
60%
60%
Fall 2012
Fall 2011
Fall 2010
Fall 2012
Fall 2011
Fall 2010
Fall 2012
Fall 2011
Fall 2010
Fall 2012
Fall 2011
Fall 2010
Fall 2012
Fall 2011
Fall 2010
Fall 2012
Fall 2011
Fall 2010
Fall 2012
Fall 2011
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
Fall 2009
Fall 2011
Fall 2009
Figure 2.10: Profile of KPU Student Body Fall 2010 through Fall 2012
Domestic International
Live in Region Outside Region
New to KPU Continuing at KPU
Study Full-time Study Part-time
Male Female
Working less than 10 hours/week Working more than 10 hours/week
Speak only English Speak English and Another Language
Seeking Baccalaureate Seeking Other Credential
Age 22 or less Age > 22
Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012
N=14,473 N=14,983 N=14,816
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 9
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
2. Institutional Overview and Strategic Direction 2013
2.2 VISION 2018: Kwantlen Polytechnic University Mission, Vision,
Values, Goals and Strategies
KPU worked from September 2012 through May 2013 to develop its first strategic plan as
a polytechnic university. VISION 2018, KPU’s Strategic Plan for 2013 – 2018, was approved
by Senate 29 April 2013 and by the Board of Governors 5 June 2013. The plan’s goals and
strategies are grouped in three themes: Quality, Reputation, and Relevance.
Mission KPU offers all learners opportunities to achieve success in a diverse range of programs
that blend theory and practice, critical understanding, and social and ethical awareness
necessary for good citizenship and rewarding careers.
Vision In 2018, KPU is Canada’s leading polytechnic university, with
inspiring educators,
all learners engaging in campus and community life,
open and creative learning environments,
relevant scholarship and research, and
authentic external and internal relationships.
Values Synergistic community relationships
Supportive and collaborative learning and working environments
Scholarship of discovery, creativity, integration, application, and teaching
Rich learner experiences and a vibrant campus life
Responsible stewardship of resources
Multiple ways of knowing
Excellence and innovation
Diversity and inclusion
Continuous personal and professional enrichment
Access and flexibility
Academic freedom
QUALITY Goals and Strategies
All KPU graduates are prepared for global citizenship and rewarding careers.
Embed learning outcomes within the University’s academic plan that prepare
students for global citizenship and rewarding careers.
Enhance internationalization at KPU to allow learners and educators to develop a
better understanding of the global challenges facing society.
Integrate sustainability into the core curriculum across disciplines.
Learner engagement and retention at KPU show continuous improvement.
Assess, select, implement, and celebrate learning methodologies and
educational delivery options that provide learners with the support within and
beyond the classroom to succeed academically, personally, socially, and
professionally.
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 10
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
2. Institutional Overview and Strategic Direction 2013
Develop and implement retention strategies that identify groups of students at
risk, set retention targets, and enhance student success.
Ensure that KPU’s physical and virtual learning spaces and other infrastructure are
able to accommodate curricular innovation and changing educational
practices, and create vibrant campuses.
Improve the student experience in first year and beyond based on the
recommendations arising from the 2011/12 internal study (Foundations of
Excellence).
Ensure that programming builds on KPU’s tradition of laddering to allow students
flexible options and recognition for previous learning.
KPU is a well-managed, integrated, and transparent organization that supports
learning.
Implement an integrated system that aligns institutional plans, allows for strategic
allocation of resources, and facilitates the articulation of, and reporting on,
annual goals and priorities.
Institutionalize effective quality assurance processes that allow for regular review
of all areas of the University.
Review and adjust KPU’s procedures to ensure efficiency and effectiveness.
Broaden the modes and increase the frequency of communication within the
University community in order to enhance transparency, decision-making,
collaboration, and relationship-building among departments.
Implement initiatives that will attract, support, engage, and retain KPU’s people
and create an environment where all employees see themselves as contributing
to student learning.
Continue to enhance environmental sustainability efforts on campus.
Create an inclusive and safe learning environment for everyone at KPU.
REPUTATION Goals and Strategies
KPU is widely recognized for its teaching and its scholarship.
Develop and implement a plan for teaching and learning, including the role of
instructional technologies that will extend and enrich the learning environment
within and across disciplines.
Develop and implement a comprehensive plan that engages KPU in research
and scholarship.
Promulgate and celebrate KPU’s achievements in teaching, learning, and
scholarship.
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 11
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
2. Institutional Overview and Strategic Direction 2013
KPU’s unique identity is clearly articulated and well understood across the University
and beyond.
Ensure that KPU’s unique role in higher education, its pride in its important
endeavors, and the success of its students are all reflected in its publications and
communications, internal and external.
Expand initiatives to improve KPU’s recognition and reputation in our
communities.
KPU is the foremost provider of continuing and professional education in its region.
Establish the necessary infrastructure to effectively expand continuing and
professional education in response to the changing needs of business, industry,
and individual adults in KPU’s region.
RELEVANCE Goals and Strategies
The impact of KPU’s community engagement has doubled by 2018.
Implement a coordinated approach to document, expand, measure, and
celebrate effective partnerships with KPU’s communities.
Establish KPU as a place where the community gathers for informed discussions
on relevant topics.
Establish KPU as a key partner in regional economic development.
Create distinct campus identities within the unifying institutional vision.
Cultivate KPU’s relationship with its alumni in order to celebrate their
accomplishments, respond to their life-long educational needs, and support their
role as KPU ambassadors in the community.
Partner with Aboriginal communities to develop appropriate educational
pathways and programs to facilitate Aboriginal learner success.
KPU’s operations support purposeful learner FTE growth of at least 5% annually to meet
the educational needs of its region’s diverse population.
Expand initiatives to increase operating and capital funding from government
and other external sources.
Undertake research to understand the needs of learners in the diverse
communities KPU serves.
Create financially viable professional development, degree completion, post-
baccalaureate, and graduate programs.
Expand the distinctiveness and scope of KPU’s program offerings to realize its
polytechnic university mandate.
Develop a comprehensive strategic enrolment management plan directed
towards traditional and non-traditional, domestic and international learners to
support strategic growth.
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 12
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
2. Institutional Overview and Strategic Direction 2013
Experiential learning is integrated into every KPU program, connecting theory to
application and the classroom to the community.
Ensure every KPU program of study includes experiential learning that connects
theory to its application.
Support and coordinate opportunities for experiential learning, applied research,
and community engagement.
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 13
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
3. Planning and Operational Context
City of Surrey Key Sectors:
Advanced Manufacturing
Agriculture
Arts
Clean Energy
Construction and
Development
Education
FIRE
Health
High Technology
One of Richmond’s economic
development strategies
involves building critical mass
of high tech companies to
facilitate synergies and create
room for innovation and
growth.
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.2
Planning and Operational Context
3.1 KPU’s Community Focus
Historically, KPU has been a regional institution, attuned to the economic, social, and
demographic trends in the communities it serves. In the new strategic plan, VISION 2018,
KPU has reaffirmed its commitment to its communities and seeks to re-focus the University
on its campuses and the ways each one interfaces with and serves its distinctive
communities. In doing so, the University is positioning itself to serve the diverse needs in its
region that is characterized by:
a mixed economy which includes a wide range of sectors such as food
processing, high tech, manufacturing, and transportation;
regional governments that are advancing economic diversification and livable-
city strategies to attract businesses and improve quality of life in their
communities;
high levels of immigration and cultural and ethnic diversity; and,
a younger demographic make-up with 31% of the region’s population under 25
compared to only 28% of the BC population.
City of Surrey The City of Surrey is supporting investment and expansion
in nine key sectors (see Figure 3.1) that will expand the
economic prosperity of the region and the quality of life
of residents. It is taking a collaborative approach to
advancing these sectors by involving industry,
government and academic partners at every
opportunity possible.
Surrey is amongst the fastest growing cities in the
province; it grew by 18.6% between the 2006 and 2011
censuses compared to the province’s 7% growth rate.
Much of the growth is attributed to immigration. According to the 2011 National
Household Survey (NHS), 40.5% of the population was foreign-born. This is 13 percentage
points greater than the provincial level. Recent immigrants arriving between 2006 and
2011 made up 18.6% of immigrants in Surrey.5
Forty-five percent of people in Surrey spoke a mother tongue other than French or
English, the most common of these was Punjabi (20%), Tagalog (2.9%) and Hindi (2.6%).
Sixty-three percent of the population primarily spoke English at home. Six percent had no
knowledge of English.6
City of Richmond Richmond is an ethnically diverse, growing, and
dynamic urban centre with a unique mix of residential
and commercial property, agricultural lands, industrial
parks, waterways, and natural areas.
5 2011 National Household Survey, Statistics Canada
6 2011 Census, Statistics Canada
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 14
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
3. Planning and Operational Context
Agriculture is vitally important to Delta’s
economic, environmental, and social
sustainability. Delta’s agricultural sector
consists predominantly of large, well-
established and efficient agricultural
operations specialized in domestic and
export markets.
Approximately 20% of employment in
the City of Langley is in the industrial
sector. With more than 2.5 million
square feet of industrial floor space,
industry is the backbone of the City of
Langley. The City of Langley’s industrial
base comprises plastics manufacturing,
metal fabrication, clothing
manufacturing, and warehousing,
amongst others.
The Township of Langley has a diverse
economic base including state-of-the-
art manufacturing industries,
agriculture, and a very strong retail and
service sector. A favourable tax base,
skilled labour force, and its strategic
location within the regional trans-
portation network make the Township
of Langley attractive to investment and
development.
Figure 3.3
Figure 3.4
Richmond's economy supports over 135,000 jobs in various sectors including services,
retailing, tourism, technology industries, light manufacturing, airport services and aviation,
agriculture, fishing, and government. In recent years, Richmond has been emerging as a
leading centre for high tech industries.
Richmond’s population is also growing faster than the provincial average at 9.2%
between the 2006 and 2011 censuses. According to the 2011 NHS, 60% of Richmond’s
population was foreign born; 17% of the immigrants living in Richmond came to Canada
within the last seven years.
Sixty-two percent of Richmond residents speak a mother tongue other than English or
French. The most commonly spoken languages are Cantonese (16%) and Mandarin
(11%). Ten percent of the population had no knowledge of English.
Corporation of Delta The economic diversification strategy of the
Corporation of Delta targets the companies
in the high tech, aviation/airport, and
green/agriculture-related sectors. The ware-
housing sector in Delta has experienced
significant growth, and there is potential for
further development of the waste
management industry.
Unlike other parts of the KPU region, Delta’s population only grew by 3.3%, nearly half the
rate of the province. Nearly 30% of Delta’s population is immigrants, of which 12% came
to Canada between 2006 and 2011.
Close to a third of Delta residents’ mother
tongue is not English or French. Punjabi was,
by far, the most frequently cited non-official
language in the 2011Census (10%) of the
population. Three percent of the population
in Delta did not speak English.
City of Langley and Township of Langley The economic development sectors
identified by the City of Langley include: arts
and culture, education, food and restaurant,
retail, residential, industrial, and professional.
The Township of Langley’s main industries
include: agriculture, air transportation,
education, social assistance and health
care, home-based businesses, and film.
The City and Township of Langley are
positioning themselves as complete
communities where families can have a high
quality of life, enjoy amenities, and work.
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 15
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
3. Planning and Operational Context
KPU Facts:
Almost half of KPU students
have learned English in
addition to another language.
Over half of high school
students who come to KPU
don’t have an academic GPA.
The number of student work
placements is growing every
year. In 2012/13, there were
over 5,000 student work
placements.
Figure 3.5
Between the 2006 and 2011 censuses, the City and Township together grew by 10.2%,
and less than a fifth of the population is immigrants, of which 14% came to Canada
between 2006 and 2011.
In the City and Township, around 15% of the residents’ mother tongue is a language
other than English or French. The top three mother tongues in the City of Langley were
German (1.5%), Spanish (1.3%) and Sino-Tibetan (1.2%). In the Township of Langley they
were Korean (2.3%), German (1.8%) and Punjabi (1.5%). Less than 1% of the population in
the City and Township did not speak English.
KPU’s communities are dynamic, diverse, and growing. They are fertile ground for KPU to
grow into its polytechnic university mandate in innovative and impactful ways. The
diverse economic base offers opportunities for KPU to be responsive to the economic
development needs of the region through the
development of innovative and relevant programs
that blend theory with practice in ways that prepare
KPU graduates for successful careers. Furthermore,
the socio-economic and cultural diversity in our
region also presents interesting opportunities for
students to develop as citizens of the world with the
ability to lead locally and globally.
KPU is committed to enriching students’ learning not
only by challenging them academically and
providing opportunities to apply what they learn in
the classroom in various contexts, but also by
providing them with the support they need to excel in
their academic endeavours. KPU has the capacity to
take students who are academically underprepared
or whose first language is not English and prepare
them so that they can learn and grow.
3.2 Engagement with Our Communities
KPU’s role in each of its communities is significant. To maximize impact, KPU seeks to
understand the specific needs of its communities, establish partnerships, and involve
students and faculty. Some examples include:
The Community Adult Literacy Program: KPU partners with non-profit agencies to
deliver programs in Richmond, Langley, and Surrey. In each of these
communities, the programs offered meet specific needs. For example, KPU
student tutors are providing one-on-one instruction in basic literacy and
workplace literacy to clients of community service agencies across the region.
The Langley Environmental Partner Society Education Programs: KPU faculty
coordinate course activities for the society’s education programs aimed at raising
awareness of the natural environment, increasing conservation efforts, and
protecting biodiversity in the area.
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 16
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
3. Planning and Operational Context
Fourth year KPU Fashion Design student, Taylor Byrom worked with Canuck Place
Children's Hospice to research the needs of children with special needs to
develop a line of clothing. Taylor designed Jolie Hart, a line of clothing
specifically made for children who have conditions such as feeding tubes,
tracheotomy tubes, wheelchair dependency, and sensory processing disorders.
Network to Eliminate Violence in Relationships (NEVR): KPU Nursing faculty are
working with thirteen community agencies to eliminate violence in relationships in
the North Delta, Surrey, and White Rock areas by coordinating efforts to provide
open and seamless service delivery, collaboration, sharing of resources among
service providers, community leaders, educators, and government bodies.
Surrey Urban Mission: six Nursing students developed a volunteer guidebook on
how to deal with difficult situations through appropriate intervention strategies for
volunteers at the Surrey Urban Mission.
Inside-Out Prison Exchange Program (Criminology 4900): KPU in partnership with
the Correctional Service of Canada at Matsqui medium security institution
brought together KPU students and incarcerated students to learn in a semester-
long academic course meeting once a week, involving a seminar-sized class (25)
composed of equal numbers of undergraduate students (outside learners) and
prisoners (inside learners) who attend class together inside prison. The program
places a human face on justice issues while giving both inside and outside
students a powerful academic and experiential learning opportunity outside the
traditional campus classroom.
Conclusion As it prepared its strategic plan, VISION 2018, this past year KPU recognized the many
and varied resources existing in our communities that will help us provide our students
with opportunities to apply their learning. At the same time, the expertise resident at the
University can make significant contributions to the economic and social development
of our communities. Initiatives to expand our relationships with our communities will be
expanded and further focused as KPU moves to full implementation of VISION 2018 in the
next years.
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 17
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
4. Alignment of KPU’s Goals and Objectives with AVED’s Objectives 2012/13
Alignment of KPU’s Goals and Objectives with
AVED’s Objectives 2012/13
BC Postsecondary System Objectives:
Capacity, Access, Efficiency, Quality and Relevance
KPU’s Strategic Plan Goals KPU’s Accountability Plan Objectives
Alignment with
Objectives for the BC
Postsecondary System
QUALITY
1. All KPU graduates are
prepared for global citizenship
and rewarding careers.
1.1 Implement student and graduate
success initiatives
Quality, Capacity
and Relevance
1.2 Provide international learning
opportunities
Relevance
2. KPU is a well-managed,
integrated, and transparent
organization that supports
learning.
2.1 Implement education and service
quality improvement programs
Quality
2.2 Ensure operational structures and
processes support student, program,
and community goals in a sustainable
manner
Efficiency and
Capacity
2.3 Ensure physical and technological
environments support student,
program, and community goals in a
sustainable manner
Efficiency,
Capacity and
Relevance
3. Learner engagement and
retention at KPU show
continuous improvement.
3.1 Create an engaging learning
environment for students
Quality
RELEVANCE
4. The impact of KPU’s
community engagement has
doubled by 2018.
4.1 Increase educational access to
different segments of KPU’s
communities
Access
4.2 Increase financial support from
community to support initiatives and
students with financial need
Access
5. KPU’s operations support
purposeful learner FTE growth of
at least 5% annually to meet the
educational needs of its
region’s diverse population.
5.1 Provide an appropriate and
comprehensive program mix to meet
targets
Capacity
6. Experiential learning is
integrated into every KPU
program, connecting theory to
application and the classroom
to the community.
6.1 Create opportunities for students to
apply theory to practice and make
connections in the community
Relevance
REPUTATION
7. KPU is widely recognized for
its teaching and its scholarship.
7.1 Provide a learning environment
that inspires inquiry, collaboration,
creativity, and application
Relevance
This page left intentionally blank.
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 19
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
5. KPU’s Goals, Initiatives and Performance Measures
KPU’s Goals, Initiatives and Performance Measures
5.1 Quality
1.1.1 The number of
credentials awarded by KPU
each year will equal or
exceed the Ministry target.
(AVED)
2012/13 Target
≥ 2,127 credentials
awarded
2012/13 Actual
2,173 credentials awarded
Performance
Assessment
Achieved
2011/12 Actual 2,026 credentials awarded
2010/11 Actual 1,934 credentials awarded
2009/10 Actual 1,693 revised by AVED to 1,939 credentials awarded
2013/14 Target > 2,237
The total number of credentials awarded calculated by AVED is the average of the three most recent
fiscal years (2008/09, 2009/10, and 2010/11). Developmental credentials are included. Apprenticeship,
short certificate, and other credentials are excluded. The Student Transitions Project is the data source for
credentials awarded. The target is calculated using the institution’s actual FTEs and it takes into
consideration the average program length.
1.1.2 Employed graduates’
assessment of the usefulness of
their knowledge and skills
acquired at KPU in performing
their job will equal or exceed
90%. (AVED)
2012/13 Target
≥ 90%
2012/13 Actual
DACSO: 80.4% (+/-3.3%)
BGS: 91.2% (+/-2.9%)
APPSO: 91.1% (+/-3.0%)
Performance
Assessment
DACSO:
Substantially
achieved
BGS:
Achieved
APPSO:
Achieved
2011/12 Actual DACSO: 78.7% (+/-3.6%); BGS: 89.9% (+/-2.6%); APPSO: 86.9% (+/-3.9%)
2010/11 Actual DACSO: 75.4% (+/-3.6%); BGS: 93.2% (+/-2.5%); APPSO: 85.5% (+/-6.1%)
2009/10 Actual DACSO: 79.2% (+/-3.2%); BGS: 96.7% (+/-1.6%); APPSO: n/a
2012/13 – 2015/16 Target DACSO/BGS/APPSO: ≥ 90%
1.1.3 The unemployment rate
of KPU’s graduates will be
lower than that of high school
graduates in the Lower
Mainland/Southwest region of
BC. (AVED)
2012/13 Target
≤ 11.1%
2012/13 Actual
DACSO: 11.3% (+/-2.4%)
BGS: 4.4% (+/-2.0%)
APPSO: 7.7% (+/-2.6%)
Performance
Assessment
DACSO:
Achieved
BGS:
Exceeded
APPSO:
Exceeded
2011/12 Actual DACSO: 12.3% (+/-2.7%); BGS: 5.7% (+/-1.9%); APPSO: 7.6% (+/-2.8%)
2010/11 Actual DACSO: 9.9% (+/-2.3%); BGS: 5.8% (+/-2.2%); APPSO: 12.6% (+/-5.1%)
2009/10 Actual DACSO: 9.1% (+/-2.2%); BGS: 4.0% (+/-1.7%); APPSO: n/a
2012/13 – 2015/16 Target ≤ unemployment rate for individuals with high school credentials or less
Goal 1
All KPU graduates are prepared for global citizenship
and rewarding careers.
Objective 1.1
Implement student and graduate success
initiatives
Postsecondary System Objective
Quality, Capacity and Relevance
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 20
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
5. KPU’s Goals, Initiatives and Performance Measures
1.1.4 [Former] student
assessment of their skill
development (written and oral
communication, group
collaboration, critical analysis,
problem resolution, reading
comprehension, and
independent learning) at KPU
will equal or exceed 85%.
(AVED)
2012/13 Target
Skill development
(avg. %): ≥ 85%
2012/13 Actual
DACSO:
Skill development (avg. %)
75.4% (+/-1.9%)
Written communication
70.4% (+/- 2.1%)
Oral communication
68.8% (+/-2.2%)
Group collaboration
81.0% (+/-1.7%)
Critical analysis
79.7% (+/-1.7%)
Problem resolution
71.7% (+/-1.9%)
Learn on your own
77.3% (+/-1.8%)
Reading comprehension
79.1% (+/-1.7%)
BGS
Skill development (avg. %)
90.0% (+/-2.7%)
Written communication
84.4% (+/- 3.3%)
Oral communication
91.3% (+/-2.6%)
Group collaboration
93.5% (+/-2.2%)
Critical analysis
93.5% (+/-2.2%)
Problem resolution
85.2% (+/-3.2%)
Learn on your own
94.7% (+/-2.0%)
Reading comprehension
87.2% (+/-3.0%)
APPSO
Skill development (avg. %)
72.0% (+/-5.1%)
Written communication
63.6% (+/- 7.5%)
Oral communication
63.9% (+/-7.5%)
Group collaboration
79.1% (+/-4.2%)
Critical analysis
77.5% (+/-4.1%)
Problem resolution
70.9% (+/-4.5%)
Learn on your own
78.6% (+/-4.0%)
Reading comprehension
70.2% (+/-4.5%)
Performance
Assessment
DACSO:
Substantially
achieved
BGS:
Achieved
APPSO:
Substantially
achieved
2011/12 Actual DACSO: 72.9% (+/-2.0%); BGS: 88.9% (+/-2.5%)
2010/11 Actual DACSO: 75.0% (+/-1.9%); BGS: 89.7% (+/-2.7%)
2009/10 Actual DACSO: 74.1% (+/-1.7%); BGS: 88.7% (+/-2.7%)
2012/13 – 2015/16 Target DACSO/BGS: ≥ 85%
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 21
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
5. KPU’s Goals, Initiatives and Performance Measures
1.2.1 International student FTEs
will increase year to year to
meet the government
objective of a 50% increase
over the next five years.
2012/13 Target
≥ 844.5 International
. FTEs
2012/13 Actual
983.1 International FTEs
Performance
Assessment
Exceeded
2011/12 Actual International FTEs: 844.5; total enrolment FTEs: 11,382.5 (7.4%)
2010/11 Actual International FTEs: 818.2; total enrolment FTEs: 11,013.1 (7.4%)
2009/10 Actual International FTEs: 687.2; total enrolment FTEs: 10,576.8 (6.5%)
2013/14 Target Yearly increase in international FTEs towards target of 1,300 international
FTEs by FY 2015/16 (based on new measure for 2012/13).
2.1.1 At least five program units
will undertake a program
review or demonstrate
completion of equivalent
external process in each
academic year.
2012/13 Target
≥ 5 program units
2012/13 Actual
6 program units completed:
Modern Languages, History,
Criminology, Political
Science, Creative Writing
and Horticulture
Performance
Assessment
Achieved
2011/12 Actual 6 program units completed: SETA, GDMA, ABE/ACP, APPD, Political
Science, and Accounting
2010/11 Actual 1 program completed the review; 8 programs began the review
process as of June 2010
2009/10 Actual
5 programs reviewed: Diploma in ELST, Bachelor of Applied Arts in
Psychology, Bachelor of Arts Major in Psychology, Bachelor of Arts Minor
in Psychology, Associated of Arts Degree in Psychology
2013/14 Target ≥ 5 program units
Goal 1
All KPU graduates are prepared for global citizenship
and rewarding careers.
Objective 1.2
Provide international learning opportunities
Postsecondary System Objective
Relevance
Goal 2
KPU is a well-managed, integrated, and transparent
organization that supports learning.
Objective 2.1
Implement education and service quality
improvement programs
Postsecondary System Objective
Quality
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 22
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
5. KPU’s Goals, Initiatives and Performance Measures
2.2.1 Student satisfaction with
transfer from KPU will equal or
exceed the average of the
previous two years.
2012/13 Target
Sending: ≥ 82.5 %
2012/13 Actual
Sending: 85% (n=303)
Performance
Assessment
Sending:
Achieved
2011/12 Actual Sending: 79.0% (n=300)
2010/11 Actual Sending: 86% (n=344)
2009/10 Actual Sending: 84.2%
2013/14 Target Sending: ≥ 82%
2.2.2 Student satisfaction with
transfer to KPU will equal or
exceed the average of the
previous two years.
2012/13 Target
Receiving: ≥ 70.1%
2012/13 Actual
Receiving: 67% (n=51)
Performance
Assessment
Receiving:
Substantially
achieved
2011/12 Actual Receiving: 65.1% (n=43)
2010/11 Actual Receiving: 75% (n=48)
2009/10 Actual Receiving: 70.0%
2013/14 Target Receiving: ≥ 67.6%
2.3.1 Create or enhance at
least one space each year
that will encourage and
support student engagement
strategies.
2012/13 Target
≥ 1 space created or
enhanced
2012/13 Actual
3 spaces enhanced
Two new student gathering
places created in Richmond
campus
Langley campus cafeteria
Performance
Assessment
Exceeded
2011/12 Actual 4 spaces enhanced
2010/11 Actual 2 spaces created, 1 space enhanced
2009/10 Actual 2 spaces created
2013/14 Target ≥ 1 space created or enhanced
Goal 2
KPU is a well-managed, integrated, and transparent
organization that supports learning.
Objective 2.2
Ensure operational structures and processes
support student, program, and community
goals in a sustainable manner
Postsecondary System Objective
Efficiency and Capacity
Goal 2
KPU is a well-managed, integrated, and transparent
organization that supports learning.
Objective 2.3
Ensure physical and technological
environments support student, program, and
community goals in a sustainable manner
Postsecondary System Objective
Efficiency, Capacity and Relevance
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 23
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
5. KPU’s Goals, Initiatives and Performance Measures
2.3.2 KPU will reduce GHG
emissions by 18% by 2016 from
its 2007 baseline using weather
adjusted calculations for
energy usage.
2012/13 Target
487 tonnes reduction
by 2016
2012/13 Actual
GHG emissions reduction of
18% or 498 tonnes from its
2007 baseline using weather
adjusted calculations for
energy use
Performance
Assessment
Achieved
2011/12 Actual 1.3% reduction or 34 tonnes from the 2007 base
2010/11 Actual 14.4% reduction or 391 tonnes
2009/10 Actual In process
2013/14 Target < 18% of GHG emissions
New measure in 2013/14: Maintain GHG emissions at 18% below 2007 baseline using weather adjusted
calculations for energy use and building area adjustments (m2) for changes to building sizes.
2.3.3 KPU will maintain energy
density level at 0.85 eGJ/m2 for
2011/12.
2012/13 Target
0.95 eGJ/m2
2012/13 Actual
Energy intensity has been
reduced to .87 eGJ/m2
Performance
Assessment
Achieved
2011/12 Actual 0.91 eGJ/m2
2010/11 Actual 0.80 eGJ/m2
2009/10 Actual 0.85 eGJ/m2
2008/09 Actual N/A - new measure in 2009/10
2013/14 Target < 0.85 eGJ/m2
New measure in 2013/14: Maintain energy intensity at 0.85 eGJ/m2 using weather adjusted calculations
for energy use.
2.3.4 The percentage of annual
educational activity occurring
between May and August will
equal or exceed the average
of the previous two years.
2012/13 Target
≥ 15.6%
2012/13 Actual
15.8%
Performance
Assessment
Achieved
2011/12 Actual 15.1%
2010/11 Actual 16.0%
2009/10 Actual 15.2%
2013/14 Target ≥ 15.5%
3.1.1 Student assessment of
satisfaction with education will
equal or exceed 90%. (AVED)
2012/13 Target
≥ 90%
2012/13 Actual
DACSO: 90.8% (+/-1.2%)
BGS: 98.0% (+/-1.3%)
APPSO: 88.2% (+/-3.0%)
Performance
Assessment
DACSO:
Achieved
BGS:
Exceeded
APPSO:
Achieved
2011/12 Actual DACSO: 91.0% (+/-1.2%); BGS: 96.4% (+/-1.4%); APPSO: 92.2% (+/-2.7%)
2010/11 Actual DACSO: 93.0% (+/-1.0%); BGS: 95.4% (+/-1.8%); APPSO: 88.0% (+/-4.7%)
2009/10 Actual DACSO: 91.7% (+/-1.1%); BGS: 97.5% (+/-1.3%); APPSO: n/a
2012/13 – 2015/16 Target DACSO/BGS/APPSO: ≥ 90%
Goal 3
Learner engagement and retention at KPU show
continuous improvement.
Objective 3.1
Create an engaging learning environment
for students
Postsecondary System Objective
Quality
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 24
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
5. KPU’s Goals, Initiatives and Performance Measures
3.1.2 Student assessment of the
quality of instruction [at KPU as
good or very good] will equal
or exceed 90%. (AVED)
2012/13 Target
≥ 90%
2012/13 Actual
DACSO: 94.0% (+/-1.0%)
BGS: 98.4% (+/-1.1%)
APPSO: 91.0% (+/-2.7%)
Performance
Assessment
DACSO:
Achieved
BGS:
Exceeded
APPSO:
Achieved
2011/12 Actual DACSO: 94.5% (+/-0.9%); BGS: 97.1% (1.3%); APPSO: 94.0% (+/-2.3%)
2010/11 Actual DACSO: 96.4% (+/-0.8%); BGS: 97.0% (+/-1.5%); APPSO: 90.3% (+/-4.2%)
2009/10 Actual DACSO: 95.1%(+/-1.5%); BGS: 95.8% (+/-1.6%); APPSO: n/a
2012/13 – 2015/16 Target DACSO/BGS: ≥ 90%
5.2 Relevance
4.1.1 Maintain or increase the
number and percent of student
population that is Aboriginal.
(AVED)
2012/13 Target
≥ 488 and 2.7%
2012/13 Actual
487 and 2.7%
Performance
Assessment
Number:
Substantially
achieved
Percent:
Substantially
achieved
2011/12 Actual 488 and 2.7%
2010/11 Actual 505 and 2.9%
2009/10 Actual 496 and 2.9% (revised by AVED from 475 and 2.8%)
2012/13 – 2015/16 Target ≥ previous year
Note: Since 2011, the Student Transitions Project is the data source for the number and percent of students
who are Aboriginal.
4.1.2 Maintain or increase the
number of Aboriginal student
spaces (FTEs). (AVED)
2012/13 Target
N/A
2012/13 Actual
Total 311 FTEs
(AVED 201 FTEs; ITA 110 FTEs)
Performance
Assessment
Not Assessed
2011/12 Actual Total 335 FTEs (201 AVED FTEs; 134 ITA FTEs)
2010/11 Actual Total 342 FTEs (184 AVED FTEs; 157 ITA FTEs)
2009/10 Actual n/a
2013/14 Target n/a
Goal 4
The impact of KPU’s community engagement has
doubled by 2018.
Objective 4.1
Increase educational access to different
segments of KPU’s communities
Postsecondary System Objective
Access
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 25
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
5. KPU’s Goals, Initiatives and Performance Measures
4.2.1 KPU will receive cash
donations from the community
for capital expansion, special
projects and student awards
that equal or exceed the
average of the previous two
years.
2012/13 Target
≥ $1,855,473
2012/13 Actual
Total: $ 2,723,512
Performance
Assessment
Exceeded
2011/12 Actual $2,014,000
2010/11 Actual $1,696,946
2009/10 Actual $1,458,695
2008/09 Actual $1,564,773
2013/14 Target ≥ $2,289,493
5.1.1 The number of Nursing and
other Allied Health student
spaces at KPU will equal or
exceed the Ministry student FTE
targets for Health and Allied
Health Programs. (AVED)
2012/13 Target
716 FTEs
2012/13 Actual
596.7 FTEs
Performance
Assessment
Not achieved
2011/12 Actual 539 FTEs
2010/11 Actual 552.2 FTEs
2009/10 Actual 527 FTEs
2008/09 Actual 470 FTEs
2013/14 – 2014/15 Target 716 FTEs
Explanation: The revamping of the admission requirements for the Bachelor of Science in Nursing
(September 2012) and Bachelor of Psychiatric Nursing (May 2013) have helped address issues of student
attrition which impacts FTEs generated. Although the Nursing and allied health FTE target was not met this
cycle, KPU met 83% of the target compared to only 72% last cycle. It is anticipated that utilization will
continue to rise as the changes in admission requirements are fully realized, and the number of students in
the Bachelor of Science in Nursing increases. The new Bachelor of Science in Nursing post-baccalaureate
program, designed to allow students who already have a baccalaureate degree to transition to the field
of Nursing and offered in a hybrid delivery format, is expected to attract additional students.
Goal 4
The impact of KPU’s community engagement has
doubled by 2018.
Objective 4.2
Increase financial support from community to
support initiatives and students with financial
need
Postsecondary System Objective
Access
Goal 5
KPU’s operations support purposeful learner FTE growth
of at least 5% annually to meet the educational needs
of its region’s diverse population.
Objective 5.1
Provide an appropriate and comprehensive
program mix to meet targets
Postsecondary System Objective
Capacity
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 26
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
5. KPU’s Goals, Initiatives and Performance Measures
5.1.2 The number of student
spaces in ABE, ESL, and ASE
programs at KPU will equal or
exceed the Ministry student FTE
target for Developmental
programs.(AVED)
2012/13 Target
968 FTEs
2012/13 Actual
701.4 FTEs
Performance
Assessment
Not achieved
2011/12 Actual 682 FTEs
2010/11 Actual 760.5 FTEs
2009/10 Actual 450 FTEs
2008/09 Actual 870 FTEs
2013/14 – 2014/15 Target 968 FTEs
In 2012, AVED approved a four-year plan for attaining KPU’s Developmental program FTE targets. The year
one FTE target in that plan (721FTEs) was substantially achieved (97%) in 2012-13. Multiple strategies to
continue increasing KPU’s Developmental program FTEs over the four years of the plan: e.g., the
accelerated ELST program, a designated recruiter and coordinated marketing strategy for
Developmental programs, increased connections with community agencies, and clearly described
pathways for students in developmental programs to other KPU programs, were put in place over the last
15 months, and development of additional strategies is underway.
5.1.3 KPU’s FTEs in trades training
and apprenticeship programs
will equal or exceed the
average of the previous two
years.
2012/13 Target
≥ 1,224 FTEs
2012/13 Actual
Total: 1,177.5 FTEs
Trades training: 402.4 FTEs
Apprenticeship: 775.1 FTEs
Performance
Assessment
Substantially
achieved
2011/12 Actual Total:1,209 FTEs (Trades training: 405.1 FTEs; Apprenticeship: 804 FTEs)
2010/11 Actual Total:1,239 FTEs (Trades training: 407.6 FTEs; Apprenticeship: 831.4 FTEs)
2009/10 Actual Total:1,371 FTEs (Trades training: 367.9 FTEs; Apprenticeship: 1,003 FTEs)
2008/09 Actual Total:1,280 FTEs (Trades training: 360.7 FTEs; Apprenticeship: 919.6 FTEs)
2013/14 Target > 1,201 FTEs
5.1.4 CTC and ACE IT program
enrolments will equal or exceed
the average enrolments of the
two previous years.
2012/13 Target
≥ 252 student
enrolments
2012/13 Actual
235 student enrolments
Performance
Assessment
Substantially
achieved
2011/12 Actual 248 student enrolments
2010/11 Actual 255 student enrolments
2009/10 Actual 336 student enrolments
2008/09 Actual 254 student enrolments
2013/14 Target ≥ student enrolments
5.1.5 The number of domestic
student spaces (FTE) at KPU will
equal or exceed the Ministry
overall student FTE targets.
(AVED)
2012/13 Target
9,141 FTEs
2012/13 Actual
9,272.8 FTEs (excludes
international and ITA)
Performance
Assessment
Achieved
2011/12 Actual 9,329 FTEs (excludes international and ITA)
2010/11 Actual 8,956 FTEs (excludes international and ITA)
2009/10 Actual 8,507 FTEs (excludes international and ITA)
2008/09 Actual 8,065 FTEs (excludes international and ITA)
2013/14 – 2014/15 Target 9,077 FTEs
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 27
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
5. KPU’s Goals, Initiatives and Performance Measures
6.1.1 Links to the workplace
through co-op education
placement, internships,
practicums, work placements,
and apprenticeships will equal
or exceed the average of the
two previous years.
2012/13 Target
≥ 4,547 links to the
workplace
2012/13 Actual
6,315 links to the workplace
Performance
Assessment
Exceeded
2011/12 Actual 4,855 links to the workplace
2010/11 Actual 4,239 links to the workplace
2009/10 Actual 3,866 links to the workplace
2008/09 Actual 3,582 links to the workplace
2013/14 Target 5,585 links to the workplace
5.3 Reputation
7.1.1 The amount of research
funding from community
partners, industry contributions,
and granting agencies will
equal or exceed the average
of the previous five years.
2012/13 Target
≥ $491,774 (based on
most recent 4 years)
2012/13 Actual
External funding:
$991,243
Performance
Assessment
Exceeded
2011/12 Actual $941,958
2010/11 Actual $578,806 (modified from $561,873)
2009/10 Actual $337,287 (modified from $657,223)
2008/09 Actual $109,047 (modified from $4,858,000)
2013/14 Target ≥ $591,668 (based on most recent 4 years)
Historical figures were modified to reflect the new criteria and tracking method introduced in 2009/10.
Goal 6
Experiential learning is integrated into every KPU
program, connecting theory to application and the
classroom to the community.
Objective 6.1
Create opportunities for students to apply
theory to practice and make connections in
the community
Postsecondary System Objective
Relevance
Goal 7
KPU is widely recognized for its teaching and its
scholarship.
Objective 7.1
Provide a learning environment that inspires
inquiry, collaboration, creativity, and
application
Postsecondary System Objective
Relevance
This page left intentionally blank.
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 29
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
6. AVED Performance Measures with Targets and Results
AVED Performance Measures with Targets and Results
System Objective: Capacity
1a. The number of domestic
student spaces (FTE) at KPU will
equal or exceed the Ministry
overall student FTE targets.
(AVED)
2012/13 Target
9,141 FTEs
2012/13 Actual
9,273FTEs (excludes
international and ITA)
Performance
Assessment
Achieved
2011/12 Actual 9,329 FTEs (excludes international and ITA)
2010/11 Actual 8,956 FTEs (excludes international and ITA)
2009/10 Actual 8,507 FTEs (excludes international and ITA)
2013/14 – 2014/15 Target 9,077 FTEs
System Objective: Capacity
1b. The number of Nursing and
other Allied Health student
spaces at KPU will equal or
exceed the Ministry student FTE
targets for Health and Allied
Health Programs. (AVED)
2012/13 Target
716 FTEs
2012/13 Actual
597 FTEs
Performance
Assessment
Not achieved
2011/12 Actual 539 FTEs
2010/11 Actual 552.2 FTEs
2009/10 Actual 527 FTEs
2013/14 – 2014/15 Target 716 FTEs
Explanation: The revamping of the admission requirements for the Bachelor of Science in Nursing
(September 2012) and Bachelor of Psychiatric Nursing (May 2013) have helped address issues of student
attrition which impacts FTEs generated. Although the Nursing and allied health FTE target was not met this
cycle, KPU met 83% of the target compared to only 72% last cycle. It is anticipated that utilization will
continue to rise as the changes in admission requirements are fully realized, and the number of students in
the Bachelor of Science in Nursing increases. The new Bachelor of Science in Nursing post-baccalaureate
program, designed to allow students who already have a baccalaureate degree to transition to the field
of Nursing and offered in a hybrid delivery format, is expected to attract additional students.
System Objective Capacity
1c. The number of student
spaces in ABE, ESL, and ASE
programs at KPU will equal or
exceed the Ministry student FTE
target for Developmental
programs.(AVED)
2012/13 Target
968 FTEs
2012/13 Actual
701 FTEs
Performance
Assessment
Not achieved
2011/12 Actual 682 FTEs
2010/11 Actual 760.5 FTEs
2009/10 Actual 450 FTEs
2013/14 Target 968 FTEs
In 2012, AVED approved a four-year plan for attaining KPU’s Developmental program FTE targets. The year
one FTE target in that plan (721FTEs) was substantially achieved (97%) in 2012-13. Multiple strategies to
continue increasing KPU’s Developmental program FTEs over the four years of the plan: e.g., the
accelerated ELST program, a designated recruiter and coordinated marketing strategy for
Developmental programs, increased connections with community agencies, and clearly described
pathways for students in developmental programs to other KPU programs, were put in place over the last
15 months, and development of additional strategies is underway.
2013/14 – 2014/15 Target 968 FTEs
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 30
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
6. AVED Performance Measures with Targets and Results
System Objective: Quality, Capacity and Relevance
2. The number of credentials
awarded by KPU each year will
equal or exceed the Ministry
target. (AVED)
2012/13 Target
≥ 2,127 credentials
awarded
2012/13 Actual
2,173 credentials awarded
Performance
Assessment
Achieved
2011/12 Actual 2,026 credentials awarded
2010/11 Actual 1,934 credentials awarded
2009/10 Actual 1,693 revised by AVED to 1,939 credentials awarded (calculation of
measure was revised by AVED)
2008/09 Actual 1,666 revised by AVED to 1,782 credentials awarded
2013/14 Target > 2,237
The total number of credentials awarded calculated by AVED is the average of the three most recent
fiscal years (2008/09, 2009/10, and 2010/11). Developmental credentials are included. Apprenticeship,
short certificate, and other credentials are excluded. The Student Transitions Project is the data source for
credentials awarded. The target is calculated using the institution’s actual FTEs and it takes into
consideration the average program length.
System Objective: Access
3a. Maintain or increase the
number and percent of student
population that is Aboriginal.
(AVED)
2012/13 Target
≥ 488 and 2.7%
2012/13 Actual
487 and 2.7%
Performance
Assessment
Number:
Substantially
achieved
Percent:
Substantially
achieved
2011/12 Actual 488 and 2.7%
2010/11 Actual 505 and 2.9%
2009/10 Actual 496 and 2.9% (revised by AVED from 475 and 2.8%)
2013/14 – 2015/16 Target ≥ previous year
Note: Since 2011, the Student Transitions Project is the data source for the number and percent of students
who are Aboriginal.
System Objective: Access
3b. Maintain or increase the
number of Aboriginal student
spaces (FTEs). (AVED)
2012/13 Target
N/A
2012/13 Actual
Total 311 FTEs
(AVED 201 FTEs; ITA 110 FTEs)
Performance
Assessment
Not Assessed
2011/12 Actual Total 335 FTEs (201 AVED FTEs; 134 ITA FTEs)
2010/11 Actual Total 342 FTEs (184 AVED FTEs; 157 ITA FTEs)
2009/10 Actual n/a
2013/14 Target n/a
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 31
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
6. AVED Performance Measures with Targets and Results
System Objective: Quality
4. Student assessment of
satisfaction with education will
equal or exceed 90%. (AVED)
2012/13 Target
≥ 90%
2012/13 Actual
DACSO: 90.8% (+/-1.2%)
BGS: 98.0% (+/-1.3%)
APPSO: 88.2% (+/-3.0%)
Performance
Assessment
DACSO:
Achieved
BGS:
Exceeded
APPSO:
Achieved
2011/12 Actual DACSO: 91.0% (+/-1.2%); BGS: 96.4% (+/-1.4%); APPSO: 92.2% (+/-2.7%)
2010/11 Actual DACSO: 93.0% (+/-1.0%); BGS: 95.4% (+/-1.8%); APPSO: 88.0% (+/-4.7%)
2009/10 Actual DACSO: 91.7% (+/-1.1%); BGS: 97.5% (+/-1.3%); APPSO: n/a
2008/09 Actual DACSO: 92.5% (+/-0.9%); BGS: 96.5% (+/-1.9%); APPSO: n/a
2013/14 – 2015/16 Target DACSO/BGS/APPSO: ≥ 90%
System Objective: Quality
5. Student assessment of the
quality of instruction [at KPU as
good or very good] will equal or
exceed 90%. (AVED)
2012/13 Target
≥ 90%
2012/13 Actual
DACSO: 94.0% (+/-1.0%)
BGS: 98.4% (+/-1.1%)
APPSO: 91.0% (+/-2.7%)
Performance
Assessment
DACSO:
Achieved
BGS:
Exceeded
APPSO:
Achieved
2011/12 Actual DACSO: 94.5% (+/-0.9%); BGS: 97.1% (1.3%); APPSO: 94.0% (+/-2.3%)
2010/11 Actual DACSO: 96.4% (+/-0.8%); BGS: 97.0% (+/-1.5%); APPSO: 90.3% (+/-4.2%)
2009/10 Actual DACSO: 95.1% (+/-1.5%); BGS: 95.8% (+/-1.6%); APPSO: n/a
2008/09 Actual DACSO: 84.3% (+/-1.3%); BGS: 97.1% (+/-1.7%); APPSO: n/a
2013/14 – 2015/16 Target DACSO/BGS: ≥ 90%
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 32
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
6. AVED Performance Measures with Targets and Results
System Objective: Quality, Capacity and Relevance
6. [Former] student assessment
of their skill development
(written and oral
communication, group
collaboration, critical analysis,
problem resolution, reading
comprehension, and
independent learning) at KPU
will equal or exceed 85%.
(AVED)
2012/13 Target
Skill development
(avg. %): ≥ 85%
2012/13 Actual
DACSO:
Skill development (avg. %)
75.4% (+/-1.9%)
Written communication
70.4% (+/- 2.1%)
Oral communication
68.8% (+/-2.2%)
Group collaboration
81.0% (+/-1.7%)
Critical analysis
79.7% (+/-1.7%)
Problem resolution
71.7% (+/-1.9%)
Learn on your own
77.3% (+/-1.8%)
Reading comprehension
79.1% (+/-1.7%)
BGS
Skill development (avg. %)
90.0% (+/-2.7%)
Written communication
84.4% (+/- 3.3%)
Oral communication
91.3% (+/-2.6%)
Group collaboration
93.5% (+/-2.2%)
Critical analysis
93.5% (+/-2.2%)
Problem resolution
85.2% (+/-3.2%)
Learn on your own
94.7% (+/-2.0%)
Reading comprehension
87.2% (+/-3.0%)
APPSO
Skill development (avg. %)
72.0% (+/-5.1%)
Written communication
63.6% (+/- 7.5%)
Oral communication
63.9% (+/-7.5%)
Group collaboration
79.1% (+/-4.2%)
Critical analysis
77.5% (+/-4.1%)
Problem resolution
70.9% (+/-4.5%)
Learn on your own
78.6% (+/-4.0%)
Reading comprehension
70.2% (+/-4.5%)
Performance
Assessment
DACSO:
Substantially
achieved
BGS:
Achieved
APPSO:
Substantially
achieved
2011/12 Actual DACSO: 72.9% (+/-2.0%); BGS: 88.9% (+/-2.5%)
2010/11 Actual DACSO: 75.0% (+/-1.9%); BGS: 89.7% (+/-2.7%)
2009/10 Actual DACSO: 74.1% (+/-1.7%); BGS: 88.7% (+/-2.7%)
2008/09 Actual DACSO: 76.5% (+/-1.6%); BGS: 93.0% (+/-2.6%)
2013/14 – 2015/16 Target DACSO/BGS: ≥ 85%
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 33
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
6. AVED Performance Measures with Targets and Results
System Objective: Quality, Capacity and Relevance
7. Employed graduates’
assessment of the usefulness of
their knowledge and skills
acquired at KPU in performing
their job will equal or exceed
90%. (AVED)
2012/13 Target
≥ 90%
2012/13 Actual
DACSO: 80.4% (+/-3.3%)
BGS: 91.2% (+/-2.9%)
APPSO: 91.1% (+/-3.0%)
Performance
Assessment
DACSO:
Substantially
achieved
BGS:
Achieved
APPSO:
Achieved
2011/12 Actual DACSO: 78.7% (+/-3.6%); BGS: 89.9% (+/-2.6%); APPSO: 86.9% (+/-3.9%)
2010/11 Actual DACSO: 75.4% (+/-3.6%); BGS: 93.2% (+/-2.5%); APPSO: 85.5% (+/-6.1%)
2009/10 Actual DACSO: 79.2% (+/-3.2%); BGS: 96.7% (+/-1.6%); APPSO: n/a
2008/09 Actual DACSO: 66.6% (+/-2.1%); BGS: 95.7% (+/-2.2%); APPSO: n/a
2013/14 – 2015/16 Target DACSO/BGS/APPSO: ≥ 90%
System Objective: Quality, Capacity and Relevance
8. The unemployment rate of
KPU’s graduates will be lower
than that of high school
graduates in the Lower
Mainland/Southwest region of
BC. (AVED)
2012/13 Target
≤ 11.1%
2012/13 Actual
DACSO: 11.3% (+/-2.4%)
BGS: 4.4% (+/-2.0%)
APPSO: 7.7% (+/-2.6%)
Performance
Assessment
DACSO:
Achieved
BGS:
Exceeded
APPSO:
Exceeded
2011/12 Actual DACSO: 12.3% (+/-2.7%); BGS: 5.7% (+/-1.9%); APPSO: 7.6% (+/-2.8%)
2010/11 Actual DACSO: 9.9% (+/-2.3%); BGS: 5.8% (+/-2.2%); APPSO: 12.6% (+/-5.1%)
2009/10 Actual DACSO: 9.1% (+/-2.2%); BGS: 4.0% (+/-1.7%); APPSO: n/a
2008/09 Actual DACSO: 7.2% (+/-1.1%); BGS: 1.2% (+/-1.1%); APPSO: n/a
2013/14 – 2015/16 Target ≤ unemployment rate for individuals with high school credentials or less
This page left intentionally blank.
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 35
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
7. Financial Information
Financial Information
7.1 Summary Financial Report 2012/13*
Financial Report 2012/13 2012/13 2011/12
Actual Forecast Actual
Revenues
Grants $74,362 $73,406 $73,755
Tuition and other fees $53,589 $46,977 $51,706
Other revenues $4,621 $10,843 $7,044
Ancillary services $8,191 $9,035 $8,333
Amortization of deferred capital
contributions $4,860 $5,105 $5,230
Restricted endowment
contributions $317 $317
Total Revenues $145,940 $145,683 $146,068
Expenditures
Salaries and benefits $104,350 $105,159 $101,383
Cost of goods sold $5,243 $6,127 $5,160
Other operating costs $22,224 $22,375 $22,414
Amortization of capital assets $9,858 $11,000 $10,105
Transfers to KPU Foundation $1,191 $1,000 $1,194
Total Expenditures $142,866 $145,661 $140,256
Net Results $3,074 $22 $5,812
Net Assets
*All figures in thousands
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 36
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
7. Financial Information
7.2 Summary Financial Outlook 2013/14 – 2015/16*
Summary Financial 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16
Outlook Forecast Forecast Forecast
Revenues
Grants $72,205 $71,155 $71,155
Tuition and other fees $55,272 $58,279 $60,784
Other revenues $6,600 $6,600 $6,600
Ancillary services $9,035 $9,035 $9,035
Amortization of deferred capital
contributions $5,105 $5,105 $5,105
Total Revenues $148,217 $150,173 $152,678
Expenditures
Salaries and benefits $107,320 $108,715 $110,889
Cost of goods sold $5,806 $5,922 $6,041
Other operating costs $23,066 $23,330 $23,545
Amortization of capital assets $11,000 $11,200 $11,200
Transfers to KPU Foundation $1,000 $1,000 $1,000
Total Expenditures $148,192 $150,167 $152,675
Net Results $25 $6 $3
*All figures in thousands
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 37
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
Appendix A: FTE Enrolment Report Year Ended March 31st, 2013
FTE Enrolment Report Year Ended March 31st, 2013
Faculty/Ministry Credential Level 2012/13
Actual 2011/12
Actual
Academic & Career Advancement
Developmental Credential 207.1 235.8
No Credential Level/Others 213.8 192.4
420.9 428.2
Arts
Baccalaureate degree 1,541.5 1,318.1
Associate degree 1,797.2 2,111.6
Diploma 226.2 250.1
Certificate/Others 53.4 92.9
3,618.2 3,772.6
Business
Baccalaureate degree 1,677.5 1,483.3
Associate degree 39.1 33.5
Post-degree Diploma 17.1 19.5
Diploma 1,046.6 1,184.7
Certificate 200.2 244.0
2,980.5 2,965.0
Community and Health Studies
Baccalaureate degree 352.4 320.9
Post-degree Certificate 5.7
Certificate/Others 331.8 303.3
684.3 629.9
Continuing Education
No Credential Level 40.2 24.3
40.2 24.3
Design
Baccalaureate degree 299.2 272.5
Diploma 49.8 43.8
Certificate 20.2 43.9
369.2 360.1
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 38
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
Appendix A: FTE Enrolment Report Year Ended March 31st, 2013
Faculty/Ministry Credential Level 2012/13
Actual 2011/12
Actual
Science and Horticulture
Baccalaureate degree 18.0 9.2
Associate degree 615.5 645.7
Diploma 145.3 154.0
Apprenticeship 113.0 142.0
Certificate/Others 143.2 137.2
1,035.1 1,088.1
Trades and Technology
Diploma 68.2 58.4
Apprenticeship 728.2 739.0
Certificate/Others 457.2 435.7
1,253.6 1,233.1
Non-credential /Undeclared
No Credential Level 48.2 37.0
48.2 37.0
Government Funded FTEs 10,450.2 10,538.3 International FTEs 983.1 844.5
Total Institution FTE 11,433.3 11,382.8
1. Basis of actual FTE calculation: The Ministry of Advanced Education, Innovation and Technology (AEIT) issued in March 2013, the February 2013 version of the Enrolment Analysis and FTE Audit tool (EAT and FAT) for the May 2013 BC Postsecondary Central data Warehouse submission.
This February 2013 version of the FTE Audit tool was used to produce student FTE enrolments for program/course instructional activities for the fiscal year 2012/13 (April 1
st, 2012 to March 31
st,
2013). 2. Report Presentation:
This enrolment statement reports all student enrolments funded by AEIT and the Industry Training Authority (ITA) – as defined in the Student FTE Enrolment Reporting Manual. This statement also reports on international student enrolments separately. These enrolments are shown separately as they are not counted towards meeting government enrolment targets.
Accountability Plan and Report 2012/13 P a g e | 39
Institutional Analysis & Planning, KPU July 2013
Appendix A: FTE Enrolment Report Year Ended March 31st, 2013
3. Full-Time Equivalent Targets: The domestic enrolment targets for 2012/13 and 2011/12 were:
2012/13 2011/12
Advanced Education, Innovation and Technology (AEIT)* 9,125 9,170 Industry Training Authority (ITA)**
Apprenticeship 968 972 Foundation 304 336
Total 10,397 10,478 4. Comparative Figures:
Report categories reflect the program credential level categories submitted to the Ministry in Kwantlen bi-annual Central Data Warehouse submissions. Certain comparative figures have been restated to conform to the report presentation adopted in the current year. Faculty is student program faculty.
*AEIT target is from the Ministry Final FTE Report templates for 2011/12 and 2012/13
**ITA target is from Schedule C – ITA Agreement for 2011/12 and 2012/13