Korean conflict the fighting

23
Korean Conflict 1950-1953 The Fighting

Transcript of Korean conflict the fighting

Page 1: Korean conflict the fighting

Korean Conflict1950-1953

The Fighting

Page 2: Korean conflict the fighting

A. The North Invades the SouthNK captures SeoulNK pushes southward towards Pusan Peninsula (overtakes 90% of SK)

Page 3: Korean conflict the fighting
Page 4: Korean conflict the fighting
Page 6: Korean conflict the fighting
Page 7: Korean conflict the fighting

UN/SK recaptures SeoulNow what?

Communism contained…… but should they try for liberation?

Page 8: Korean conflict the fighting

UN/SK pursue Roll-back policy

Page 9: Korean conflict the fighting

C. The South Enters the NorthUN/SK capture Pyongyang

D. Chinese Involvement

Chinese threatened to enter if…

Page 10: Korean conflict the fighting
Page 11: Korean conflict the fighting

Chinese infiltrated NK lines & captured

Increase in Soviet troops too

Page 12: Korean conflict the fighting

Bloody Ridge, after capture by NK on September 5, 19512,700 American & SK casualties and approx. 15,000 NK casualties.

Heartbreak Ridge followed Bloody Ridge & claimed 3,700 American & French casualties and approx. 25,000 North Koreans and Chinese. (U.S. Army photo.)

Page 13: Korean conflict the fighting

UN/SK pushed back and lost Seoul

Containment or Roll-back?… (again)

Page 14: Korean conflict the fighting
Page 15: Korean conflict the fighting
Page 16: Korean conflict the fighting

E. MacArthur is DemotedMacArthur: Bomb Southern China!

Truman: NO!

Page 17: Korean conflict the fighting

For what (4) reasons did MacArthur give for wanting to bomb Southern China?Interlocking global issues… domino effectEqual “interest” -- How could the U.S. stop Communism in Korea but ignore it in China?

No ground troops – save American livesOther military leaders supported his ideas

“no substitute for victory” – No appeasement

Why was Truman opposed to the idea?

Page 18: Korean conflict the fighting
Page 19: Korean conflict the fighting

IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 10, 1951

ORDER TO GENERAL MACARTHUR FROM THE PRESIDENT

I deeply regret that it becomes my duty as President and Commander in Chief of the United States military forces to replace you as Supreme Commander, Allied Powers; Commander in Chief, United Nations Command; Commander in Chief, Far East; and Commanding General, U.S. Army, Far East.

You will turn over your commands, effective at once, to Lt. Gen. Matthew B. Ridgway. You are authorized to have issued such orders as are necessary to complete desired travel to such place as you select.

My reasons for your replacement will be made public concurrently with the delivery to you of the foregoing order, and are contained in the next following message.

Page 20: Korean conflict the fighting

IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 10, 1951

STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT

With deep regret I have concluded that General of the Army Douglas MacArthur is unable to give his wholehearted support to the policies of the United States Government and of the United Nations in matters pertaining to his official duties. In view of the specific responsibilities imposed upon me by the Constitution of the United States and the added responsibility which has been entrusted to me by the United Nations, I have decided that I must make a change of command in the Far East. I have, therefore, relieved General MacArthur of his commands and have designated Lt. Gen. Matthew B. Ridgway as his successor.

Full and vigorous debate on matters of national policy is a vital element in the constitutional system of our free democracy. It is fundamental, however, that military commanders must be governed by the policies and directives issued to them in the manner provided by our laws and Constitution. In time of crisis, this consideration is particularly compelling.

General MacArthur's place in history as one of our greatest commanders is fully established. The nation owes him a debt of gratitude for the distinguished and exceptional service which he has rendered his country in posts of great responsibility. For that reason I repeat my regret at the necessity for the action I feel compelled to take in his case.

Page 21: Korean conflict the fighting
Page 22: Korean conflict the fighting

Japan embargoTruman DoctrineMarshall PlanNATOAttacked for Comm. in China

Page 23: Korean conflict the fighting

F. OutcomeMatthew Ridgeway >

U.S. commanderUN/SK regained land to 38th parallel again