Korea Western Power · Gunsan C/C (718MW) 2,998MW Coal LNG 1,400MW Taean Pyeongtaek Gunsan...
Transcript of Korea Western Power · Gunsan C/C (718MW) 2,998MW Coal LNG 1,400MW Taean Pyeongtaek Gunsan...
Korea Western Power Ratings Presentation November 2012
Confidential Presentation
Table of Contents Agenda
1. Company Overview
2. Industry Overview
3. Operation Overview
4. Financial Management
5. Financial Forecast
I. Company Overview
Strong Credit Profile
Korea Western Power (KOWEPO) has maintained its strong credit profile
KOWEPO is closely linked with KEPCO,
given 100% share ownership and role as
the sole off-taker
There will be no change in the
shareholding structure for KEPCO and
Gencos for the foreseeable future
KEWEPO’s cost system ensures that it
can pass increases in fuel costs to
KEPCO
Wholesale electricity tariff system helps
maintain KOWEPO’s earnings and
financial stability
KOWEPO has maintained strong financial
stability with Debt/EBITDA of 2.5x and
EBIT/Interest Expense of 6.5x as of 1H
2012
The commercial operations of the new
plants will enhance operating cash flows
for debt reduction over the medium-to-
long term
KOWEPO plays a key role in the supply of
electricity in Korea, having provided
11.6% of all sales volume in 1H 2012
KOWEPO has a combined capacity of
8,409MW as of June 2012
Strong financial stability
Strategically important role of
KOWEPO Close link with Korea Electric
Power Corp (“KEPCO”)
Cost pass-through pricing
mechanism
Overview of Credit Profile
1
KOWEPO has established strong power generating facilities in Korea
Company Overview
One of the Most Important Gencos in Korea
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
Base Load Intermediate Load Peak Load
In Operation
Taean T/P
(4,000MW)
Pyeongtaek
T/P
(1,400MW)
4,000MW
Seoincheon
C/C
(1,800MW)
Pyeongtaek
C/C (480MW)
Gunsan
C/C (718MW)
2,998MW
Coal
LNG BC Oil
1,400MW Taean
Pyeongtaek
Gunsan
Seoincheon
Seoul and Gyeonggi Metropolitan Area
Samrangjin
Taean, Gunsan,
Samrangjin, Sejong
City, Taean S/H
(11MW)
Metropolitan Area
Power Plant Region
Sejong City
Hydro
Solar
Generation Capacity by Type of Plant Location of Plan Complex
Base load, intermediate load, and peak load account for 48%, 17% and 35% respectively in terms of generation capacity in
operation
Over 91% of capacity is located in or near the Seoul and Gyeonggi metropolitan areas
Seoul and Gyeonggi metropolitan areas comprise approximately 44% of total national demand
___________________________ Note: T/P denotes “Thermal Power Plant”, C/C denotes “Combined Cycle”, S “Solar”, S/H “Small Hydro.” Source: “Statistics of Electric Power in Korea”, KEPCO as of August 2012.
2
Company Overview
KOWEPO
8,408
10.3%
KOSEP
8,199
10.1%
KOMIPO
7,952
9.8%
KOSPO
9,240
11.3%
EWP
8,816
10.8%
KHNP
26,022
31.9%
Others
12,889
15.8%
Market Share by Generation Capacity
Others
38,410
9.2%
KHNP
152,443
31.6%
EWP
51,121
11.7%
KOSPO
58,085
13.1%
KOMIPO
51,355
10.4%
KOSEP
58,039
12.5%
KOWEPO
52,903
11.6%
Market Share by Sales Volume
(MW)
Total Generation Capacity
81,552MW
(GWh)
Total Electricity Sales
315,192GWh
Strong Market Position
KOWEPO maintained strong market share in terms of capacity and sales volume
___________________________ Source: “Statistics of Electric Power in Korea” , KEPCO as of Aug 2012.
3
Industry Overview
Industry Overview
Latest Power Industry Operating Environment
The Power Industry Restructuring Plan Delayed and the Former Privatization Plan for Gencos Cancelled
Privatization plan for
Gencos indefinitely
suspended
MOCIE(1) announced
restructuring plan for
power industry
Incorporation of
generation companies
Cost-based pool
bidding (“CBP”)
mechanism
IPO of KOSEP was
delayed
Implementation of
TWBP(2) was
suspended
Gencos were
designated as
market-oriented
public firms
Initiation of KOSEP
privatization
Plan to separate
KEPCO’s distribution
sector was halted due
to substantial risk and
uncertain benefits
from the separation
plan
Introduction of vesting
contracts for Gencos
deferred
Wholesale competition
was put on hold
Update on Gencos Privatization and Consolidation Plan
Privatization plan for KEPCO and its Gencos was cancelled in July 2008
Gencos have been designated as market oriented public firms by government to create a more efficient management structure and enhance their
competitiveness in 2011
1999 2000 2002 2001 2003 2004 2005 2007 2008 2006 2009 2010 2011
___________________________ 1. MOCIE : Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy (currently renamed as Ministry of Knowledge Economy). 2. TWBP : Two Way Bidding Pool.
4
Korean power generating sector is expected to enjoy constant demand growth and
government support
Industry Overview
High Electricity Demand and Strong Gov’t Support
240258
278294
312332 349
369385 394
434455
314
100
200
300
400
500
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
1H
2012
TWh
History of Power Consumption
Power consumption has continued to rise on the back of strong economic growth at an average rate of 6.0% per annum from 2000 tp
2011
Power demand is expected to grow at an average rate of 2.9% per annum from 2012 to 2024
The country imposed rolling blackouts as recently as September 2011, due to numerous maintenance issues which led to insufficient
peak load; this highlights the slim margin between electricity demand and supply
South Korea will have to develop more coal- and gas-fired generating capacity despite the strong expected growth in clean energy;
planned clean energy projects are insufficient to alleviate this shortage problem, and the government will have to increase capacity to
avoid an electricity shortfall
The South Korean government has plans to invest KRW49 tn (USD43 bn) in the country’s power generation capacity by 2024
Commentary
CAGR 6.0%
___________________________ Source: “Statistics of Electric Power in Korea”, KEPCO as of August 2012 / The Bank of Korea as of June 2012 / “Electricity Supply and Demand Basic Plan #5”, MKE as of 2010.
462482
503521
536 551567
582598 612 626 640 654
300
400
500
600
700
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
TWh
Electricity Demand Forecast
CAGR 2.9%
5
Govt’s Mid-to-Long Term Energy Supply Scheme
Industry Overview
Government’s Mid-to-Long Term Energy Strategy
24.8% 25.5% 29.4% 31.9%
32.1% 32.2% 29.7%27.9%
25.8% 21.9%
4.9% 4.4% 4.2%
4.3% 6.2% 7.2%
4.4% 4.6% 4.3%
24.6%24.4%
4.3% 3.8% 3.6%7.1%
5.2%2.8%2.2%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2010 2015 2020 2024
Nuclear Coal LNG Oil Hydraulic Renew able Others
___________________________ Source: “Electricity Supply and Demand Basic Plan #5”, MKE as of 2010.
Expansion on cost effective base load infrastructure in addition to promotion of environmental friendly energy sources such
as renewable energies, following the Government’s Green Growth Plan
By year 2024, the installed capacity for
Nuclear Power : 24.8% (’10) 31.9% (’24)
Coal : 32.1% (’10) 27.9% (’24)
LNG : 25.8% (’10) 20.9% (’24)
Renewable : 2.2% (’10) 4.3% (’24)
Installed Capacity Forecast by different energy sources
6
Industry Overview
Electricity Pricing Mechanism
Application of The Adjusted Coefficient of SMP
KOWEPO can pass through 100% of its fuel cost through the energy price
Electricity Generation Cost Evaluation Committee annually determines The Adjusted Coefficient
Power Price Comparison
Price type Price Remarks
Capacity
Payment
(CP)
Base Load
KRW 7.73/kWh
KRW 7.73/kWh as a base price, CP is
differentiated by regions, by seasons and by
hours Non Base Load
Energy
Price
Base Load
[Max {(SMP-Fuel Cost), 0} x
The Adjusted Coefficient + Fuel Cost]
The Adjusted Coefficient (Sept. 2012~)
Nuclear : 0.1194 (←0.1718)
Coal : 0.0001 (←0.0500)
Anthracite : 0.0001 (←0.2000)
Others/General : 0.0001 (←0.0936) Non Base Load
Newly raised Adjusted Coefficient will decrease KOWEPO’s operating income by KRW63.5 bn
※ SMP : System Marginal Price
Introduction of “The Adjusted Coefficient of SMP” will motivate Gencos to construct base load power plants and
lead to fair competition among Gencos. It will increase the efficiency of the power market by stimulating cost
reduction
Source: Company data as of September 2012.
KOWEPO continues to enjoy 100% fuel cost pass through pricing mechanism
7
Operation Overview
Sub-Header: Enter your optional sub-heading here
Operation Overview
Power Plant Facilities in Operation
___________________________ Source: “Statistics of Electric Power in Korea”, KEPCO as of June 2012. 1. GT: Gas Turbine 2. ST: Steam Turbine
KOWEPO Operates 48 Generation Units with Total Generation Capacity of 8,409MW
Type Fuel Type Number of Units Capacity (MW) Capacity Factor(%)
Taean
Thermal Bituminous 8 4,000 93.7
Small Hydro - 4 2.2 22.0
Solar - 2 0.7 -
Pyeongtaek
Thermal BC Oil 4 1,400 29.1
Combined Cycle LNG GT(1) : 4
ST(2) : 1
320
160 33.4
Seoincheon Combined Cycle LNG GT(1) : 8
ST(2) : 8
1,200
600 76.5
Gunsan
Combined Cycle LNG GT(1) : 2
ST(2) : 1 718 90.1
Solar - 1 0.3 14.7
Samrangjin Solar - 2 3 14.7
Sejong City Solar - 3 5 -
TOTAL 48 8,409 75.4
8
Operation Overview
New Business - Domestic
Power
Plant Type
Generation
Capacity
Construction
Period Remarks
New Plant
Taean
IGCC
Integrated
Gasification
Combined
Cycle
(IGCC)
380MW
Nov. 2011
~Nov. 2015
(49M)
Consortium with KEPCO E&C, Doosan Heavy(IG) / GE (CC) / Kumho E&C
R&D project supported by the government
Reduced emission of CO2 and waste by-products due to higher efficiency
compared to coal-fired electrical power plants
Taean
#9, #10 Thermal
2,100MW
(1,050x2)
Sep. 2012
~Dec. 2016
(52M)
Consortium with KEPCO E&C, Hitachi & Daelim, Hitachi
Largest unit capacity in Korea
Generation cost to be lowered through facility optimization such as expanding
combustion range of low rank coal
Pyungt
-aek 2nd
Combined
Cycle 946.5MW
Jul. 2012
~Oct. 2014
(28M)
Consortium with KEPCO E&C, MHI & Marunbeni, Daewoo / Lotte / Daejoe
Emergency power plant to prepare exponential increase in demand in summer of
2013
Initiation of Gas Turbine in July 2013
GT 317.5 MW x 2; ST 311.5 MW x 1
Equity Investment
Garolim Tidal 520MW
Oct. 2013
~Aug. 2020
(83M)
Consortium with POSCO E&C, Daewoo E&C, Lotte E&C
Project Financing
KOWEPO to be in charge of operation and maintenance
Dongdu
-cheon
Combined
Cycle 1,880MW
Jun. 2012
~Dec. 2014
(31M)
Consortium with Samsung E&C
Project Financing
KOWEPO to be in charge of operation and maintenance
KOWEPO plans to maintain its strong market position and superb operating performance
promoting growth with new plant constructions and new business
___________________________ Source: Company data as of September 2012.
9
KOWEPO plans to diversify its revenue through overseas expansion by leveraging its
proven experience in operating and maintaining power plants
Operation Overview
New Business - Overseas
Project Type
Gen Capacity /
Construction
Period
Ownership
Structure
Total Project
Expense Funding Method Remarks
Equity Investment
Rabigh,
Saudi Arabia Heavy Oil 1,204MW
KOWEPO 40%
NOMAC 60% n/a n/a
Consortium with KEPCO-ACWA
Construction started in Jun. 2009
KOWEPO to be in charge of O&M
Maharashtra,
India C/C
388MW /
2 yrs
KOWEPO 40%
PPIL 51%
Individual 9%
USD274 mn
Debt 75%
Equity 25%
(Local Financing)
Consortium with PPIL
Construction started in Feb. 2012
Build, Own, Operate & O&M
Xe-Namnoi,
Laos Hydro
410MW /
5 yrs
KOWEPO 25%
SK E&C 26%
Ratchaburi 25%
LHSE 24%
USD1,020 mn
Debt 70%
Equity 30%
(ADB, KEXIM,
Commercial
Banks)
Consortium with SK E&C, Ratchaburi,
LHSE
Construction expected to start in Jun.
2013
Build, Own, Operate, Transfer & O&M
Takalar,
Indonesia Thermal
250MW /
3 yrs
KOWEPO 48%
Indika 47%
MSC 5%
USD436 mn
Debt 70%
Equity 30%
(ECA, Commercial
Banks)
Consortium with Sambu, Yooho, MSC
Construction expected to start in Jul.
2013
Build, Own, Operate & O&M
Under PPA Negotiation
___________________________ Source: Company data as of June 2012.
10
Short
Term
18%
Long
Term
82%
Long
Term
100%
Fuel costs account for 88.2% of production costs
Long-term supply contracts assure adequate supply of the raw
materials
Hedging risks by adjusting portion of long-term contracts with market
volatility
Saved KRW5.9 bn of coal via group purchase with other Gencos
Operation Overview
Cost Efficiency
___________________________ Source: Company data as of June 2011. 1. Others: Fuel costs other than that required to generate electricity, such as fuel required to start up the generating units.
Coal
28.9%
LNG
57.9%
Oil&Others
13.2%
Fuel Cost Composition
44 50 52
110
148
208
108129
147
0
50
100
150
200
250
2010 2011 1H2012
KRW / kWh
Coal Heavy Oil Combined(LNG)
Fuel Cost
3,264
1,818
471 336 310 143
0
1,500
3,000
4,500
Indonesia Australia South
Africa
Colombia Canada US
Kiloton
Major Suppliers of Coal
Total 6,343 kilotons
Coal LNG
KOWEPO has implemented a cost competitive strategy
(1)
11
Operation Overview
Insurance Coverage -1H 2012
Asset Comprehensive Insurance
Details
Insurance Type Asset Comprehensive
Insurance
Insurer Dong-bu Fire & Marine
Insured Period 2012.01.01 ~ 2013.01.01
Insured Amount KRW6,402 bn
Insured Target Generation Facilities
KOWEPO is fully insured on its facilities under operation or construction and shipment/transportation
of fuels and raw materials to refrain from any unexpected accident and subsequent losses
Assembly Insurance
Details
Insurance Type Construction works for
Taean Pier 3 Site
Insurer Samsung Fire & Marine
Insured Period 2009.10.28 ~ 2013.09.30
Insured Amount KRW163 bn
Insured Target Fuel Unloading dock and
Equipments
Insurance on Cargo
Details
Insurance Type
Fuel and Equipment
Facilities Comprehensive
Insurance on Cargo
Insurer Lotte Fire & Marine
Insured Period 2012.02.01 ~ 2013.02.01
Insured Amount KRW1,655 bn
Insured Target Fuel and Equipments
___________________________ Source: Company data as of June 2012.
12
Operation Overview
View on USD/KRW and its Impact
Management’s View on USD/KRW
Impact of change in FX rate on KOWEPO
Current(1) 2012 2013 2014
USD/KRW 1,091 1,080 1,060 1,040
USD/KRW rate is expected to be gradually stabilized with downward tendency
The precise estimation of USD/KRW rate is difficult given the volatile nature of world’s macro economies
Under the CBP (Cost-Based Pool) system, the fuel price hikes as a result of depreciation of KRW (or appreciation of USD)
shall be 100% compensated
In that reason, KEPCO’s financial condition could be impacted by the FX fluctuation
The company enters into the cross-currency swaps for all its long-term foreign currency denominated debt, thus neutrally
positioned against FX fluctuation
KOWEPO is putting enormous effort on currency rate risk management through increasing credit line of the company and
reviewing to set dollar reserves
___________________________ 1. USD/KRW FX rate as of 1 November 2012.
KOWEPO has implemented strategies to minimize risks related to FX fluctuation
13
Financial Management
Financial Management
Capital Structure
___________________________ Source: Company filing as of 30 June 2012. 1. Financial data based on non-consolidated K-GAAP accounting standard. 2. Financial data based on consolidated K-IFRS accounting standard.
4,499
5,287
5,982
2,567
2,9523,134
1,932
2,847
2,335
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
2010 2011 1H 2012
(KRW bn)
Total Assets Total Shareholders' Equity Total Liability
Capital Structure
Assets
KRW5,982 bn
Non-Current Assets / Total
Assets Ratio : 74.5%
Liability
KRW2,847 bn
Shareholders
Equity
KRW3,134 bn
wholly owned by KEPCO
Revenue
KRW3,293 bn
EBITDA
KRW397 bn
Net Income: KRW135 bn
(1) (2) (2)
14
Financial Management
Financial Performance (1)
4,572
5,208
2,622
3,294
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
2010 2011 1H 2011 1H 2012
(KRW billion)
Revenue
6.1x
2.5x3.0x
6.5x
0.7x
1.5x
2.2x2.5x
0.0x
2.0x
4.0x
6.0x
8.0x
2010 2011 1H 2011 1H 2012
EBIT / Gross Interest Expense Debt / EBITDA
Interest Coverage
692
497
251
397
0
200
400
600
800
2010 2011 1H 2011 1H 2012
(KRW billion)
EBITDA
39%
50%
62%
28%33%
38%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
2010 2011 1H 2012
Debt / Equity Debt / Capital
Leverage
___________________________ Source: Company filing as of 30 June 2012.
15
Financial Management
Financial Performance (2)
___________________________ Source: Company filing as of 30 June 2012.
EBITDA / Revenue EBITDA / Net Interest Expense Debt / Equity
12.0%
18.5%
12.4%
13.9%13.6%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
KOWEPO KOSEP KOMIPO KOSPO EWP
17.0x
10.8x
14.2x
18.2x17.9x
0x
5x
10x
15x
20x
KOWEPO KOSEP KOMIPO KOSPO EWP
62.0%
77.8%
67.7%
47.3%
39.6%
0%
15%
30%
45%
60%
75%
90%
KOWEPO KOSEP KOMIPO KOSPO EWP
16
Financial Management
Financial Statements
Income Statement
___________________________ Source: Company filing as of 30 June 2012. 1. Financial data based on non-consolidated K-GAAP accounting standard. 2. Financial data based on consolidated K-IFRS accounting standard. 3. Decimal difference.
(Unit : KRW bn)
2009(1) 2010(1) 2010(2) 2011(2) 1H2011(2) 1H2012(2)
Sales 3,817 4,767 4,572 5,208 2,622 3,294
Cost of Sales 3,681 4,393 4,277 5,030 2,526 3,069
Gross Profit 136 374 295 178 96 225
SG&A 32 38 39 55 23 28
Net Other Operating Income (IFRS adj.) - - 20 (4) 6 (2)
Operating Profit (Loss) 104 335(3) 276 119 79 196
Non-Operating Income 141 87 47 13 17 23
Non-Operating Expense 132 104 81 64 34 40
Net Profit from Subs / Affiliates (IFRS adj.) - - (3) (1) (1) 1
Income Tax Expense (Benefits) 25 72 55 25 10 44
Income from Discontinued Operations (Loss) - - 34 - - -
Net Income (Loss) 88 246 218 42 51 135
17
Financial Management
Financial Statements
Balance Sheet
(Unit : KRW bn)
2009(1) 2010(1) 2010(2) 2011(2) 1H2012(2)
Assets
Current Assets 843 815 1,348 1,182 1,528
Non-Current Assets 3,639 3,683 4,040 4,105 4,454
Total Assets 4,482 4,499* 5,388 5,287 5,982
Liabilities
Current Liabilities 956 765 994 938 985
Non-Current Liabilities 1,171 1,167 1,138 1,397 1,862
Total Liabilities 2,127 1,932 2,132 2,335 2,847
Stockholders’ Equity
Capital Stock 176 176 1,443 1,192 1,192
Capital Surplus 1,267 1,267 22 2 -
Retained Earnings 896 1,116 1,791 1,757 1,859
Total Stockholders’ Equity 2,354 2,567 3,256 2,952(3)
3,135
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity 4,482 4,499 5,388 5,287 5,982 ___________________________ Source: Company filing as of 30 June 2012. 1. Financial data based on non-consolidated K-GAAP accounting standard. 2. Financial data based on consolidated K-IFRS accounting standard. 3. Decimal difference.
18
Financial Management
Financial Statements
Cash Flow Statement
___________________________ Source: Company filing as of 30 June 2012. 1. Financial data based on non-consolidated K-GAAP accounting standard. 2. Financial data based on consolidated K-IFRS accounting standard .
2009(1) 2010(1) 2010(2) 2011(2) 1H2011(2) 1H2012(2)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net Income 88 246 218 42 51 135
Non-cash Income & Expenses 306 410 546 478 220 273
Changes in Assets and Liabilities 98 (38) (52) (167) (73) 4
Other - - (88) (76) (38) (9)
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities 492 619 624 277 160 403
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Purchase of Fixed Asset (593) (487) (506) (452) (197) (555)
Other, Net (34) (19) (12) 11 14 5
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities (627) (506) (518) (441) (183) (550)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Cash Inflows 1,234 968 968 721 250 945
Cash Outflows (1,014) (1,062) (1,061) (422) (325) (422)
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities 220 (94) (93) 299 (44) 503
Cash and Cash Equiv. at End of Period 131 150 153 285 87 641
(Unit : KRW Bn)
19
Financial Management
Details on Credit Line Facilities -1H 2012
Bank Amount
NACF KRW100 bn
Bank Overdraft Facilities
Bank Amount
KEB KRW284 bn
Shinhan KRW100 bn
Bill Acceptance Facilities
Bank Amount
KEB USD18 mn
RBS USD80 mn
BNP Paribas USD60 mn
SC First Bank USD50 mn
Shinhan USD30 mn
HSBC USD100 mn
Mizuho Corporate Bank USD100 mn
Deutsche Bank USD100 mn
Short-term FCY Credit Facilities
___________________________ Source: Company data as of June 2012.
20
Financial Management
Debt Profile (1)
Debt Maturity Profile (1) Local vs. Foreign Currency
100.0
220.0
80.0100.0
404.0
570.0
160.0
0
200
400
600
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Foreign
(KRW 714bn)
42%
Local
(KRW 1,004bn)
58%
Floating
(KRW 104bn)
6%
Fixed
(KRW 1,617bn)
94%
Fixed vs. Floating Rate Debt
___________________________ Source: Company filing as of 30 June 2012. 1. Excludes swap effect of KRW29 bn and short-term borrowings of KRW182 bn.
(KRW bn)
21
Financial Management
Debt Profile (2)
Rating Triggers / Financial Covenants
Bond # 11~ 16 (KRW)
Rating Trigger
-
Financial Covenants
Liability/Equity ratio 500% or less
Collateral Not permitted
Sales of assets Sales more than 5 trillion KRW are not permitted in the same fiscal year
Maturity
2013.11- 2021.11
Currency Swap
Eurobond
Issue USD150 mn / 5.5%
Currency Swap KRW143.8 bn / 4.81%
Global bond
Issue USD500 mn / 3.125%
Currency Swap KRW570 bn / 3.83%
22
KOWEPO expects to increase its CAPEX for next 3 years
Financial Management
Capital Expenditure Plan
969
1,548
2,138
1,701
244
333
1,213
1,890
2,471
2,034
342
333
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
2012 2013 2014 2015
Unit : KRW billions
Expansion Maintenance&Others
Capital Expenditure Schedule
___________________________ Source: Company data as of June 2012.
23
Financial Management
Diversified Funding Sources (1)
KOWEPO successfully diversified its funding sources by establishing global MTN program
___________________________ Source: Issue Orderbook.
Benefits from the GMTN Programme
On 3 May 2012, KOWEPO priced a
US$500 million 5-year Reg S/144A
senior unsecured bond under its
Programme
With an issue spread of T5+235bps to
yield 3.169%, KOWEPO achieved
aribitrage funding on an after swap
basis, compared with the domestic
KRW market
USD500 mn Public Bond Offering (May 2012)
KOWEPO’s USD2 bn GMTN Programme
The Programme allows KOWEPO to access broader funding
markets and investor base, while issuing in various forms –
Currency: In any currency agreed between the issuer and the
relevant dealers
Type of Notes: Includes Fixed Rate, Floating Rate, Index Linked,
Dual Currency and Zero Coupon Notes
The cost of funding can be materially reduced on back of reduced
documentation process and timely access to relevant capital markets
Korea Western
Power Co., Ltd.
US$500 billion
3.125% due 2017
May 2012
24
Financial Management
KOWEPO secured funding sources by successfully issuing KRW100 bn Hybrid Bond
Diversified Funding Sources (2)
Hybrid Bond Issuance Terms
Spread:
5-yr T-bond +120bp
Method:
Private
Placement
Ratings:
AA+
Tenor:
30-Year
Revolving
Size:
KRW100 bn
Coupon
Rate:
4.05%
Benefits from Hybrid Bond
Increase in funding without diluting share value
Categorized as equity under IFRS
Does not deteriorate liability-to-equity ratio
Stock market multiples (ROD and P/E) do not
deteriorate
Option to extend tenor
Essentially equivalent to perpetuity bond
Call option (after 5 years)
Allows refinancing at a lower interest rate in the future
Step-up feature: +100bps after 10 yrs
Leads to higher investor demand
___________________________ Source: Company data as of October 2012.
25
Financial Forecast
Key Assumption
Assumptions Used for Financial Projection
(Unit : KRW bn) 2012 2013 2014 2015
GDP Growth (%) 3.3% 4.0% 4.3% 4.5%
Inflation (%) 2.8% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
FX rate (KRW/USD) 1,130 1,130 1,130 1,130
Oil Price (USD/barrel) 105 110 110 110
Interest Rate (%) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
26
Financial Statements (1)
Balance Sheet
(Unit : KRW bn) 2012 2013 2014 2015
Assets
Current Assets 995.3 1,258.8 1,347.0 1,448.5
Non-Current Assets 5,253.7 6,671.3 8,672.4 11,051.5
Total Assets 6,249.0 7,930.1 10,019.4 12,500.0
Liabilities
Current Liabilities 900.6 1,018.5 1,011.8 1,045.8
Non-Current Liabilities 2,132.2 3,580.1 5,049.6 6,971.3
Total Liabilities 3,032.8 4,598.6 6,061.4 8,017.1
Stockholder’s Equity
Capital Stock 351.1 210.1 438.7 527.8
Capital Surplus 1,031.4 1,031.4 1,031.4 1,031.4
Retained Earnings 1,829.4 2,085.8 2,483.6 2,919.5
Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2
Total Stockholders’ Equity 3,216.2 3,331.6 3,958.0 4,482.9
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity 6,249.0 7,930.1 10,019.4 12,500.0
___________________________ Note: Forecast subject to change by year end.
27
Financial Statements (2)
Income Statement
(Unit : KRW bn) 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sales 5,713.1 6.140.2 6,396.8 6,706.3
Sales of Electric Power 5,689.6 6,084.4 6,340.2 6,651.3
Others 23.5 55.8 56.5 55.0
Cost of Sales & SGA 5,538.1 5,683.7 5,785.8 6,038.0
Operating Income 174.9 456.4 611.0 668.3
Non-Operating Income 23.5 14.1 15.1 17.0
Non-Operating Expense 100.5 101.4 88.0 98.0
Income before Tax 98.0 369.2 538.1 587.3
Income Tax 23.2 88.9 129.8 141.7
Income(Loss) from Equity Method Invest. (5.3) (3.7) 71.9 133.7
Net Income 69.4 276.6 480.2 579.3
___________________________ Note: Forecast subject to change by year end.
28
Financial Statements (3)
Cash Flow Forecasts
(Unit : KRW bn) 2012 2013 2014 2015
Operating Activities 331.9 846.4 947.0 1,000.8
Net Income 69.4 276.6 480.2 579.3
Non-cash Expenses &Incomes 455.7 344.1 383.6 455.3
Depreciation 409.4 283.2 313.3 397.8
Changes in Assets and Liabilities (193.3) 225.7 83.2 (33.8)
Investing Activities (1,473.4) (1,948.0) (2,324.8) (2,780.6)
Plant Construction &Facility Improvement (1,318.3) (1,684.2) (2,144.8) (2,599.1)
Others (155.1) (263.8) (180.0) (181.5)
Financing Activities 864.2 1,104.2 1,380.4 1,782.4
Cash Balance, Beginning of Year 294.0 16.6 19.2 21.8
Net Cash (277.4) 2.6 2.6 2.6
Cash Balance, End of Year 16.6 19.2 21.8 24.3
___________________________ Note: Forecast subject to change by year end.
29
This presentation material is prepared by Korea Western Power (the “Company”) solely for your information only. All or any part of this
presentation material may not be taken away, reproduced, redistributed, or retransmitted in any manner. You agree to be bound by the
above condition by participating into this presentation. Any non-compliance may be against the related laws and requirements.
This presentation material does not constitute an offer to purchase or sell the related securities or forms the basis of, or be relied upon in
connection with any contract, commitment or investment decision whatsoever.
This presentation material may contain forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on a number of
assumptions about the future, some of which are beyond the Company’s control. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update
any forward-looking statements to reflect events that occur or circumstances that arises after the date of this presentation. Potential
investors should bear in mind that actual financial results may differ materially from the following forward-looking statements.
The information contained in this presentation material is not verified by any independent third party. No warranty is made as to, and no
reliance should be placed on, the fairness, accuracy, completeness or correctness of the information contained herein. The information
contained in this presentation material should be interpreted under the prevailing circumstances. There is no update and nothing to be
updated upon the presentation to reflect any significant change in the development. At no time does the Company or the related directors,
management, employees, agents or advisers accept any liability for the information contained in this presentation material and accordingly
accept any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from any use of this presentation material.
Disclaimer
30