Kok 2000
-
Upload
pranav-kulkarni -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Kok 2000
-
7/24/2019 Kok 2000
1/26
This article was downloaded by: [Dalhousie University]On: 08 October 2014, At: 09:31Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Petroleum Science and TechnologyPublication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lpet20
MATHEMATICAL MODELLING OF WAX DEPOSITION INCRUDE OIL PIPELINES (COMPARATIVE STUDY)M.V. Kok
a& R.O. Saracoglu
a
aDepartment of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering , Middle East Technical University
Ankara, 06531, Turkey
Published online: 27 Apr 2007.
To cite this article:M.V. Kok & R.O. Saracoglu (2000) MATHEMATICAL MODELLING OF WAX DEPOSITION IN CRUDE OIL PIPELIN(COMPARATIVE STUDY), Petroleum Science and Technology, 18:9-10, 1121-1145, DOI: 10.1080/10916460008949895
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10916460008949895
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the Content) containedin the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make norepresentations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of th
Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, andare not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon anshould be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable forany losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoeveor howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematicreproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in anyform to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10916460008949895http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditionshttp://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditionshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10916460008949895http://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080/10916460008949895http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lpet20 -
7/24/2019 Kok 2000
2/26
PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 18 9 10), 1121-1145 2000)
M THEM TI L MODELLING OF WAX DEPOSITION IN CRUDE
OIL
PIPELINES OMPARATIVE STUDY)
M.V.Kok and R.O.Saracogiu
Department
Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Middle East Technical
University 653
Ankara Turkey
ABSTRACT
In this research, wax deposit ion in different crude oil pipel ine systems was studied.
In oil pipel ines, the main mechanism for wax appearance is the temperature change
along the pipeline. A computer program was developed to simulate the wax
precipitation phenomena. Temperature profile along the pipeline was determined and
sol id l iquid equil ibrium constant, wax mole fraction and wax th ickness along the
pipel ine were calculated. This computer program was applied to different crude oil
pipeline systems in Iraq Baiji-Daura, Rumaila-Zubair-Fao and Haditha-Rumailia).
In Haditha-Rumaila crude oil pipel ine system, it
was observed that wax thickness
after a year is approximately 0.1 mm and temperature declined from 303 K to around
300.5 K. The wax mole fraction after a year is approximately 0.2. The solid- liqu id
equil ibrium constant for the first component around 0.228 and around 165 for the
second component af te r a year. Similar results were obse rved in other c rude oil
pipeline systems studied.
Keywords: crude oil pipel ine , wax thickness, temperature prof ile , sol id-l iqu id
equilibrium constant, wax mole fraction
INTRODUCTION
Many crude oils throughout the world contain significant quantit ies of wax
which will readily crystallise during the production, transportation and storage of the
1121
opyrightce2 by Marcel Dekker Inc
www.dekker.com
-
7/24/2019 Kok 2000
3/26
1122
KOK AND S R OGLU
oil. This results in an increase in viscosity by several orders
of
magnitude, oil
gelation the formation of a yield stress and deposition on pipeline walls
Ward/wI/gil
and
Boger 1991 . Depos it ion of wax on the wall of p ipel ines is often
regarded as a problem since the tube diameter is reduced. Consequently, more power
is needed to force the same amount
of
oil through the system
Svendsen
1993 . The
wax precipitated from oil mixtures primarily consists of CIS to C
l 6
paraffin waxes
or C
l O
to C
60
microcrystall ine waxes , both made up of aligned paraffinic and
naphthenic molecules, paraffin waxes are also called microcrystalline
amoudaand
Davidsen 1995 . Waxes are multitude of higher-molecular-weight paraffinic
components Ihat are minutely soluble in the liquid phase of black oils and
condensates. As the fluid cools,
each
wax component becomes less soluble until the
higher-molecular- weight components solidify. This onset of crystallisation is known
as the cloud-point , or wax-appearance, temperature. As the fluid continues to cool,
lower-molecular-weight species also sol idi fy, adding to the solid fraction. Wax
crystallisation is controlled by temperature but is also dependent on fluid
compos ition , especia lly the light ends. To avoid waxing, thermal techniques are
applied by keeping the flowing-fluid temperature higher than the wax-appearance
temperature. Provided the pipeline is not totally blocked, hot fluids to melt the
deposit arc widely used. Waxes are multitude of higher-molecular-weight paraffinic
components that are minutely soluble in the liquid phase of black oils and
condensates. As the fluid cools , each wax component becomes less soluble until the
higher-molecular- weight components solidify. This onset of crystallization is known
as the cloud-point , or wax-appearance, temperature. As the fluid continues to cool,
-
7/24/2019 Kok 2000
4/26
WAXDEPOSITION INCRUDE OIL PIPELINES
3
lower-molecula r-weight species also solidify, adding to the sol id fraction . Wax
crystallisation is controlled by temperature but is also dependent on fluid
composi tion , especially the light ends. Solid waxes , when present in sufficient
quantities, can significantly affect oil viscosity. hey especially act as dispersion,
causing non-Newtonian, shear-thinning behaviour. If sufficient waxes are present in
the solid phase in static or very-low-flow conditions, they can interact to form a
matrix that entraps the liquid phase and effectively gels the fluid. The temperature at
which this occurs is known as the pour point.
Wardaug and oger
1991 defined waxy rude a rheologically complex
material whose flow proper ties are determined by the shear and thermal history
imparted to the oil. They concluded that the equil ibrium flow proper ties depend
s trongly on the shear history with very low shear his tories resulting in the highest
shear stresses. This results in a minimum operating condition below which flow in a
pipel ine would cease. This is of particular concern in the operation of declining oil
fields and poin ts to the need to design a waxy crude oil pipeline, not only for the
maximum flow but also for the minimum anticipated flow. In the rheological sense,
flow improver additives act to reduce the effect of the shear history and to reduce the
minimum operating condition to lower shear stresses pressure drops and shear rates
flow rates .
Svendsen
1993 developed a mathematical model for prediction
of
wax
deposition in both open and closed pipeline systems by using a combination
of
analytical and numerical models. The model includes several scientific disciplines
such as phase equilibr ium, phase transition and fluid dynamics. In any case the
-
7/24/2019 Kok 2000
5/26
4
KOK AND SARACOGLU
model predicts that wax deposition can be cons ide rably reduced when the wall
temperature is below wax appearance point, provided the liquid/solid phase transition
expressed by the change in moles of liquid with temperature. If, in addition, the
coefficient of thermal expansion is sufficiently large, some components may separate
and move in opposite radial directions at temperatures below WAP.
Hamouda and Davidsen 1995 performed experiments, which was designed
to simula te the now characteris tics at pipel ine .pressure. They developed three-
dimensional model for paraffin deposition rates at various flow regimes. They
concluded that the paraffin deposit ion by molecular d if fusion mechanism is the
dominant one and also the paraffin concentration gradient is the driving force of the
molecular diffusion mechanism but on the other hand shear dispersion mechanism
becomes more pronounced as the temperature gradients decreases. They also
observed wax depos ition rate with the flow rate might be explained by the increase
of the temperature gradient until the point where the sh r stress on the wall becomes
large enough to affect the adhesion of the wax crystal onto the pipe wall.
urger Perkins and Striegler
1981 studied to investigate mechanisms of
wax deposition and to determine the expected nature and thickness of deposits in the
Trans Alaska Pipeline System TAPS as a function of time and distance. Deposition
is bel ieved to occur as a resul t of lateral t ransport by diffusion, shear dispersion and
Brownian diffusion. They identified three mechanism accounting for lateral transport
molecular diffusion, sh r dispersion and Brownian diffusion. Molecular diffusion
dominates at the higher temperature and heat flux conditions, whereas shea r
dispersion is the dominant mechanism
at
the lower temperatures and low heat fluxes.
-
7/24/2019 Kok 2000
6/26
WAX DEPOSITION
RU E OIL PIPELINES 1125
The contribution of Brownian diffusion is small compared with the other
mechanisms. The size distribution of the precipi tated waxy particles increases
linearly with decreasing temperature. Gravity settling of particles as a mechanism
for wax deposition is negligible under flow conditions due probably to the
redispersal of the particles by shear dispersion.
Hsu and rubaker 1995 developed a wax deposit ion scale-up model
including the molecular diffusion effect and shear effect to scale-up laboratory wax
deposition results for waxy crude production lines. The wax deposition model allows
users to predict wax deposition profile along a cold pipeline and predict potential
wax problems and pigging frequency. They concluded that the flow turbulence effect
has significant impact on wax deposition and can not be neglected in wax deposition
modelling. Also shear rate, shear stress, and Reynolds number can not be used as a
scaler. Critical wax tension is verified as a reasonable scaler. They also concluded
that many wax deposition models only apply a molecular diffusion mechanism in
modelling and neglect shear effect. However, the flow turbulence effect has
significant impact on wax deposition and can not be neglected in wax deposi tion
modelling.
Hsu Santamaria and rubaker
1994 developed a new method to measure
wax deposi tion of waxy live crude oils under turbulent flow conditions without
knowing oil properties or disassembling the system for wax deposition measurement.
Under turbulent flow conditions the pseudo-plastic non-Newtonian behaviour of cold
waxy crude significant ly affects wax deposition rate. They concluded that wax
deposition from waxy crude could be reduced significantly under turbulent flow
-
7/24/2019 Kok 2000
7/26
1126
KOKANDSARACOGLU
conditions.
he
flow turbulence depresses the temperature at which maximum wax
deposit ion rate occurs. Also the s loughing effect generated under turbulent flow
conditions has significant impact on wax deposit ion rate and can not be neglected in
wax deposition modelling. As another observation, oil composition is factor affecting
wax deposit ion. Usually, wax deposit ion rate decreases with increasing oil bubble
point pressure under turbulent flow conditions. However, at specific flow conditions
for waxy live oil with a specific oil bubble point p ressure may have the same wax
deposit ion rate as its stock tank oil. They also concluded that the wax hardness and
carbon number of the wax deposited on the pipe wall increase with retention time.
Wardallgh and oger 1991 concluded that the yielding behaviour of waxy
crude oil is accomplished by three distinct characteristics as elast ic response, slow
deformation, leading to a breakdown of structure fracture-like and fracture-like
behaviour resembling the fracture solids.
Weingarten and uchner 1986 developed experiments to measure wax
crystallisation conditions and deposition rates. They concluded that, wax solubility
can be expressed in accordance with ideal-so lu tion theory for paraffinic waxes in
paraffin-based oils. Also, sloughing of deposits occurs when the
she r
rate is high
enough that the shear stress at the wall exceeds the strength of the wax deposit. he
onset of sloughing is not related to a transition from laminar to turbulent flow.
Mendell and Jessen 1972 used chemica l addit ives to present paraffin
deposit ion exhibited varying degrees of effectiveness, depending on the crude oil
being treated. he degree of crystal modificat ion caused by an addit ive is reflected
by the cold flow test. A change in the cold flow curve was accompanied by a change
-
7/24/2019 Kok 2000
8/26
WAX DEPOSITION RU E OIL PIPELINES
1127
in the paraffin deposition curve. The extent to which each fractional part of the
paraffin content of the crude oil is affected by the changes observed in the molecular
weight distribution compared with that of the saturated fraction of the crude oil.
Pan Firoozabadi and FOlland 1997 studied the effects of pressure and
composition on wax precipitation. They observed the cloud point temperatures at
live-oil conditions and the amount of precipitated wax at stock-tank-oil conditions.
The model showed that, normal paraffins readily precipitated, followed by
naphthenes and iso-paraffins, while aromatics stayed in the liquid phase. The cloud
point tempera ture was strongly influenced by heavy normal paraffins while the
amount of the precipitated wax depends on the concentration
of
n-paraffins as well as
isoparaffins and naphthenes.
According to Hamouda
n
Viken 1996 , wax deposit ion occurred by
molecular diffusion, shear dispersion and gravi tational set tl ing, but molecular
diffusion seemed to be dominant mechanism. They observed the wax appearance
point, and found a linear relationship between wax component and temperature.
Lira Galeana Firoozabadi and Prausnitz.
973 developed a
thermodynamic framework for calculating wax precipitation in petroleum mixtures
over a wide temperature range. The framework used the experimentally supported
assumption that precipitated wax consisted of several phases; each solid phase was
described as a pure component or pseudo-component that did not mix with o ther
solid phases.
T ORY
Deposition of solid material on pipe walls is frequently observed in fluid flow
-
7/24/2019 Kok 2000
9/26
8
KOK AND SARACOGLU
systems.
It
is very important to estimate the wax deposition criteria during
production and transportation. he main mechanisms by which the wax deposition
occur in pipelines are molecular diffusion, shear dispersion and rownian diffusion.
he gravity se ttli ng mechan ism has a ls o been identif ied; however. molecular
diffusion is the predominant mechanism. Certain conditions must be fulfilled if wax
deposition shall occur. he best known is:
-Measurable wax deposition will occur only if the wall temperature is bel ow the
prccipitation temperature of the particular oil WAP .
-A negat ive radial temperature gradient must be present in the flow. A zero gradient
implies that approximately no deposition will occur.
-Wall friction must be so large that wax crystals can stick to the wall.
Molecular Diffusion
For all flow condi tions, oil will be in laminar flow either throughout the pipe
or at least in a thin laminar sub-layer adjacent to the pipe wall. When the oil is being
cooled, there will be a temperature gradient across the laminar sub-layer. If
temperatures are below that level where solid waxy crystals can be precipitated, then
the flowing elements
of
oil will contain precipitated solid particles and the l iquid
phase will be in equil ibrium with the sol id phase, ie., the l iquid will be saturated with
dissolved particles as the temperature decreases . he temperature profi le near the
wall, t herefo re, will lead to a concent ra tion gradien t
of
d is so lved wax, and this
dissolved material will be transported toward the wall by molecular diffusion. When
this diffusing material reaches the solid/liquid interface, it will be precipitated out of
-
7/24/2019 Kok 2000
10/26
WAX DEPOSITION IN CRUDE OIL PIPELINES
9
sol ution. T he mass flux of dissolved wax mol ec ul es c ont rol le d by mo le cul ar
diffusion only is defined as Svendsen, 1993);
dW
d
_
D de dT
t
w
m dT dr
From the above equation, the wax deposition rate reaches its m axim um value just
below the cloud point
Hammouda and Davidsen,
1995
Brownian Diffusion Mechanism
Small, solid waxy crystals, when suspended in oil, will be bombarded
continually by thermally agitated oil molecules. These collisions will lead small
random Brownian movements of the suspended particles. If there is a concentration
gradient of these particles, Brownian motion will lead to a net transport, which,
nature and mathematical description, is similar
to
diffusion. The Brownian diffusion
coefficient for spherical, non-interacting particles is given by
Burger et al,
1981 ;
and a dispersing of particles. Wax deposition by shear dispersion can be described by
Burger et ai, 1981; Weillgarlell
nd
Euchner, 1986);
d
s
=
k yA
dt
-
7/24/2019 Kok 2000
11/26
1130
Gravity SeWing Mechanism
KOK AND SARACOGLU
Precipi ta ted waxy crystals are denser than the surrounding liquid oil phase.
Hence, if panicles were non-interacting, they would settle in a gravity field and could
be deposited on the bol tom of pipes or tanks. For an initially uni form mixture in a
vessel, there would be an initial rate of se tt ling followed by a diminishing rate of
deposition, which asymptotically would approach zero at complete settling.
Overall Deposition Mechanism
Total deposition in pipelines can be described by combin ing molecular
diffusion and shear dispersion by
urger
et al
1981 ;
IV = AD dCdT k C i4
I P dT
dr
...
p
=
a
T
-
T
)+
P
a
where;
a.;
P a
a
... and P a must be determined exper imental ly for each oil, and
where T is a reference temperature.
Freezing Temperature and Heat of Fusion
V 1986 used a correlation between freezing temperature
of
component i
i and molecular weight of the component i M as;
TJi
= 74 5 + O 02617M
i
_
~
I
-
7/24/2019 Kok 2000
12/26
-
7/24/2019 Kok 2000
13/26
1132
II
=
L O
i
=
L
aj-E, = a-E
=
i l
Determination of Wax Weight Fraction as Function of z
KOK N SARACOGLU
The weight fraction 11 ;asIuuction of d is ta nc e from inlet, z can be d et ermi ne d
from a mass b ala nce on a pipe s eg me nt b et wee n z and z+Llz, whe re z is an a rb it ra ry
position in the pipe. The mass now rate of each component i in the p os it io n z at time
r is
P,(z,l)q
where
q
is the
volumetric
oil now rate, a ss um ed to be a pp ro xi ma te ly
constant. The mass balance for component i over Llz is Svendsen, 1993 ;
Pi z+ t:lz,t)q
-
Pi (z,t}/
=-2nR iit:lz
whe re , Rw and ji are both fun ct io ns of z and t. After d iv is io n with
LIz
and taking the
limit Llz approaches to zero Svendsen, /993 ;
dP
i
=
-2nR ,J;
dZ
q
The weight fraction of wax in position
z+Llz
then yields
Svendsen, 1993 ;
)
2nR ,J; .z
)
Pi Z,I -
p. z+ .Z,t
lV.(Z+ .Zt)= = q
,
m (z+ .z,t) 27fR
w
j
p
.z
Z,I -
LJ
p q
The overall weight fraction
of
wax in p os it io n z at time I is Svendsen, 1993 ;
-
7/24/2019 Kok 2000
14/26
WAX DEPOSITION N CRUDE OIL PIPELINES
w, z,r)=
t
W i Z,t)=
t
Wi
Z,t)V i z.t)
i j l
Temperature Distribution
1133
The oil flow temperature distribution T r,Z) depends on the velocity profile I , r).
In the fol lowing it is assumed that the sys tem is operat ing
at
approximately steady-
state thermal conditions.
Solut ion for Small Values of z
A practical solut ion for T r,z when z is small. The solut ion is valid if the
Graetz
number
GZ=Pmaqc kL
is large, that is, if heat convection is much larger than
heal conduction and yields Svendsen, 1993 ;
T
T r , z =T
0 Jexp -I J II
o
r 4 /3)
R r
I
_
_ _
V9{3z
= a
o
u m l ~
The temperature gradient in position r.z) is then:
T
To
J
-r -(4-/- -3) V9 { zexp -I ,
z
0
-
7/24/2019 Kok 2000
15/26
1134
KOK AND SARACOGLU
Mole Fraction Determination
Accoun ting for the total composition effect on mole fractions, McCain
1973 proposed a model for liquid and gas mixtures, converted for solid and liquid
mixtures.
Xi
=
=
I
1 ll
s
i
I
i
=
- - - - - - - : - - -
=
1
L
-
1
I
II
- I
i
,
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Paraffin deposit ion mostly results from cooling and precipi ta tion high
molecular weight hydrocarbons during the movement
particles. Precipitation is an
example fluid/solid phase equilibrium. In pipeline systems, because
precipitated
particles, pipeline diameter reduces, and more power is needed to transport the same
amount of oil through the system. When oil cools below the cloud point/wax
appearance point WAP , a concentration gradient leads to transport by molecular
diffusion with subsequent precipitation and deposition occurs at the wall. The aim
this study is to determine the expected nature and thickness of deposits in the
pipeline as a function time and distance in oil pipelines. Wax deposition is usually
a slow process, and total blockages are rare. However, small reductions in diameter
and, more significantly, an increase in the pipe-wall roughness have a dramatic effect
on flow-line.
-
7/24/2019 Kok 2000
16/26
WAX DEPOSITION IN CRUDE OIL PIPELINES
Table-I
Input Data for Computer Simulation
A Pa.s)
1.056.10 /
To
K)
303
B K)
3429,5
T, K)
278
am
kg/nr . K) -0.65
T, K)
293
Pm kg/m )
855
k W/m.K)
0.134
a
w
k g/m .K) -0.5 p J/kg.K) 1920
pw, kg/nr )
885 Tn K)
272
M, kg/kmol)
215
TrdK)
341
M
2
kg/kmol) 530
L .Hn
kJ/mol)
34.9
w, paraffin wax) 0.85
I
kJ/mol)
107.8
W2 microcrystalline wax) 0.15
1135
In the course of this research, Baiji-Daura, Rumaila-Zubair-Fao and Haditha-
Rumailia crude oil pipeline systems have been simulated on
computer
with constant
wall temperature as a boundary condition for the temperature distribution Table-t).
Crude Oil Pipeline Systems
Iraq decided in the 1970 s to build a pipeline between its northern and
s ou th ern oil fields, ess en ti al ly to enabl e oil p ro du ced in the north of the cou nt ry to be
exported from the Gulf. The pipeline was completed in 1975, the pipeline comprises
two s ecti on s, one 655 km. long l in ki ng H ad it ha to R um ai la and ano th er 105 km. long
connecting Rumaila to Fao. Storage facilities at Fao are linked by submarine
pip el ine s to the deep sea t er mi na ls of Mina a l- Ba kr and Kohr al- Arnaya , In 1988
-
7/24/2019 Kok 2000
17/26
1136 KOK AND SARACOGLU
like the original pipeline, the second line
was
to be 42 inches i n di amete r and have a
capacity of 700,000 b d
Program Assumptions
The assumptions used for simplification of the program are listed below:
-Wax precipi ta tion occurs only when the pipeline fluid temperature is below wax
appearance temperature.
-Initially, solid concentration equals to zero.
-Pressure is assumed to be constant through the pipeline.
-When a solid par ticle occurs, it does not change into l iquid state . Also, sol id does
not have a reaction effect.
-The ratio of activity coefficient of liquid to solid is assumed to be equal unity.
-Inne r wall temperature is constant through the pipeline, which is less than wax
appearance
temper ture
Crude oil pipeline simulation results yearly wax deposition, bulk fluid
temperature, sol id-l iquid equil ibrium constant, wax mole fraction through the
pipeline and temperature effect in wax mole fraction is presented in figures 1-6 for
Haditha-Rurnailia crude oil pipeline . In figure-I yearly wax deposition thickness it
was observed that wax s tart s to depos it around 250 km. from inle t because of high
pumping rate and reaches about 0.10 mm after a year. In figure-2 bulk fluid
temperature it was seen that temperature starts to decline around 8 km. from inlet
and declines around 301 K. In figure-3 sol id l iquid equil ibrium constant for the first
-
7/24/2019 Kok 2000
18/26
WAX DEPOSITION IN CRUDE OIL PIPELINES
1137
0 12
E
0 1
E
-:: 0 08
III
III
Q
0 06
:
:5 0 04
s:
0 02
a
..
/
/
/
a
100 200 300 400
500 600
700
Distance from Inlet, z km
Figure Yearly
Wax
Deposition
Thickness inHaditha- Rumaila
Crude Oil
Pipeline
303.5
303,0
-:: 302 5
::I
302,0
.
E 301,5
f
301,0
. ...
.
..
.
1.....
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
300,5
o 100
200 300
400
500
600 700
Distance from Inlet, Z km
Figurc 2 Bulk Fluid Temperature in Hadilha Rumaila CrudeOil Pipeline
-
7/24/2019 Kok 2000
19/26
8
0,235
0,230
0,225
e
o
0,220
0,215
0,210
KOK AND SARACOGLU
/
/
0,205
100
200
300 400 500
600
700
Distance from Inlet, z km)
Figure-S Solid
iquid Equilibria onstant
for
the first omponent
in
Hadllha
Rumaila
rude
il
Piperine
component} it was observed that K value starts to rise around 290 krn. from inlet
with a value
0,21 and reaches 0,23 at the end
the pipel ine, In figure-4 sol id
liquid equil ibrium constant for the second component it was observed that K value
starts to rise around 300 km. from inlet with value
120 and reaches 164 at the end
of the pipeline. In figure-S wax mole fraction it was observed that wax mole
fraction starts to rise around 350 km. from inlet with a value of 0.194 and reaches
0,20 at the end of the pipeline . In f igure-6 temperature effect in wax mole fraction
in an inverse proportional between wax mole fraction with tempera tu re was
observed which means that wax mole fraction increases as the temperature decreases,
Similar results were observed in other crude oil pipeline systems studied,
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, a mathematica l model for prediction wax deposi tion in
-
7/24/2019 Kok 2000
20/26
WAX DEPOSITION IN
RU E
OIL PIPELINES
1139
I
..........
-
I
20
a
a
180
160
C 140
il 120
E:
100
E
80
.:1
@
6
40
w
100
200 300
400
500 600
700
Distance from Inlet, z (km)
Figure 4
SOlid
Liquid Equilibria
Constant
for
the second
Component
in dith Rumaila Crude Oil Pipeline
I
1 -
1 --
r
-...... . I I
1
0,201
0,200
5
0,199
ii
0,198
e
u
0,197
0 0,196
:;;
) ( 0,195
0,194
0,193
0,192
a
100
200 300
400
500 600 700
Distance from Inlet z, (km)
Figurc 5
WaxMole Fraction in Haditha Rumaila Crude
Oil
Pipeline
-
7/24/2019 Kok 2000
21/26
r
r
I
KOK AND SARACOGLU
140
0 12
0 10
c
0
0 08
l
lL
0 06
0
:;;
0 04
0 02
0 00
300 5
301
301 5
302
Temperature K
302 5 303
303 5
igllrc G Temperature effect inWaxMole raction inHaditha- Rumaila rude OilPipeline
different pipeline systems has been developed using a combination
or
analytical and
numerical models. The model includes several scienti fic discipl ines such as phase
equilibria phase transition and fluid dynamics.
It is also known that from published experiments that measurable wax
deposit ion will occur if the temperature
of
the bulk fluid is below the precipi tation
temperature of the particular oil and if simultaneously there is a nega tive radial
temperature gradient present in the flow.
The
amount of deposit ion also depends on the oil composi tion. The model is
consistent with experimental observations.
The
proposed combined phase t ransi tion and mass flux model is perhaps
quite generally valid and not restricted to oil and wax. Whether the derived
theoretical results hold well must be determined experimentally.
The
theory presented requires a lot of input data ranging from fluid
composition equilibrium data flow properties and thermal data.
-
7/24/2019 Kok 2000
22/26
X DEPOSITION INCRUDEOILPIPELINES
As presented in figures as the temperature of the fluid declines along the
pipeline, the wax mole fraction, solid-liquid equilibrium constant and wax thickness
incre ses
At lower temperatures the possibility of wax appearance increases.
REFERENCES
Burger, E.D., Perkins, T.K and Striegler, J.H., 1981. Jour. of Petroleum Tech.l075.
Chung, T.H., 1992. SPE 24851, 61 Annual Technical Conference and xhibition-
Washington USA.
Erickon,D.D., Niesen,V.G and Brown, T.S., 1993. SPE 26604, 68 Annua Technical
Conference and Exhibition - Houston - Texas.USA.
Hamouda, A.A and Viken, B.K. 1993. SPE 25189,
International Symposium on
Oilfield Chemistry - New Orleans. USA.
Hamouda, A.A., Davidsen,S 1995. SPE 28996, lnternational Symposium on
Oilfield Chemistry. San Antonio. USA.
Hsu Ll.C. and Brubaker, J.P., 1995. SPE 29976, International Meeting on
Petroleum Engineering. Beijing. Chine. 241.
Hsu
i.r.c.
Santamaria, M.M. and Brubaker, J.P., 1994. SPE 28480, 69 Annular
Technical Conference and Exhibition - New Orleans USA 179.
Keating, J.F., Wattenbergen, R.A., 1994. SPE 27871, Westem Regional Meeting.
Long Beacti-Catifornia US
Lira-Galena.C. Firoozabadi, A.
and
J.M. 1996.,AlChE . 42, pp.235.
McCain, W.O., 1973. The Properties of Petroleum Fluids , Petroleum Publishing
Company, Chapter 5.
Mendell, J.L, and Jessen, F.W., 1972., Jour. ofCan. tro Techn. 60.
Pan H., Firozoodai, P and Folland, P. 1997. SPE Production
Facilities 250.
Svendsen, J 1993. AlChE 39, No.8, 1377.
Wardhaugh, L.T. and Boger, O.V., 1991. AlChE 37 No 6 871.
-
7/24/2019 Kok 2000
23/26
1142
KOKAND SARACOGLU
Wardhaugh, L.T., and Boger, D.V. 1991. Jour Rheology 35 6), 1121.
Weingarten, J.S., and Euchner , J.A., 1986, SPE 15654.
61 Allllual Technical
Conference and Exhibition New Orleans USA
Won. K.W., 1986.
Fluid Phase Equilibria 30.265.
NOMENCLATURE
am
Parameter
in oil density
model
kg/m
3 K
a Particle diameter rum)
a Parameter in wax densi ty model
(kg/m]K)
II First parameter in viscosity equation Pa.s)
Surface area of clean inncr pipe wall m
2
)
C Volume fraction concentration
of
wax in solut ion
C, Parameter in diffusion constant model N)
c
p
Specific heat capacity of the mixture J/kg.K)
c, Concentration of precipitated waxes at the wall
nnerdiameter of the tube m)
O
Diffusion constant m
2/s)
h Wax thickness m)
Gas/liquid equilibrium constant
Gz Graetz number
6H
r
Heat
of fusion Jzrnol)
j Mass flux
of
wax kg/s.m
2
)
k mpirical constant analogous to reaction alc constant
k Thermal conductivity
of
the mixture (W/m.K)
k
Thermal diffusion ratio
K Liquid/solid equilibrium constant
L Pipc length
in)
L, Number
of
moles in liquid phase per mole mixture
-
7/24/2019 Kok 2000
24/26
WAX DEPOSITION IN CRUDE OIL PIPELINES
1143
y
L,
m
m.,
M
M
M
s
n
n
P
q
r
R
R
o
R,
Rw
s,
IS
T
Number
of
moles
of
gas
phase
per mole mixture
Number of
moles in solid
phase
per mole mixture
parameter
in power-law flow model
Wa x
deposition
pe r
> c lean wall at t ime
of measuring
(kg/m )
Molecular weight
of
component
i
(kg/krnol)
Mass of wax crystals which flow in the pipe of length at time of
measuring (kg)
Mass of wax crystals which flow outside th e pipe of length L at time of
measuring (kg)
Mass
of
wax crystals which flow in the whole closed at time of
measuring (kg)
Mass
of
wax depos it on the p ipe wall at time
of
measuring (kg)
Molecular
weight of component
Number
of components
Mole number
Pressure Nlm )
Volumetric flow rate (m)/s)
Heat source
(Jzs.nr )
Radial distance (m)
Ga s
constant=8.3143 (JlmoI.K)
Inner
radius of the clean pipe (01)
Reynolds number, R e = p v d l ~ l
Time
dependent
inner
radius of the pipe (rn)
Mole fract ion in sol id phase
Time
(s)
Residence
t ime in
closed
systems (s)
Length of simulation (s)
Temperature
(K)
Ambient temperature (K)
Freezing temperature of
component i K
Tube inlet temperature (K)
-
7/24/2019 Kok 2000
25/26
u
v
v
v,
X;
j
z
w
WAP
WI
Subscripts
w
a
KOK AND SARACOGLU
Inner wall
steel )
temperature K
Precipitation temperature of wax temperature K
Reference temperature K
Heat-transfer coefficient
W/m .K)
Average axial velocity m/s
Maximum
axial velocity
m/s
Molar volume of mixture rrr )
Volume of the closed system reservoir rrr )
Mole fraction in liquid phase
Mole fraction in gas phase
Mole fraction in mixture
Mole fraction in mixture
Distance from pipe inlet m
Weight
fraction
Wax Appearance Point K
Total wax deposition kg
Component
Liquid phase
Solid Phase
Wax
nitial
Grcek Letters
B
y
Thermal Diffusivity
Coefficient
of
thermal expansion
Parameter
m )
Activity coefficient
-
7/24/2019 Kok 2000
26/26
WAX DEPOSITION IN CRUDE OIL PIPELINES
1145
o
fl
n
J
Dimensionless weight function
Dimensionless length
l -L, fL,
ynamic
viscosity
N.sfnl
3.14159
Density of fluid mixture kgfm3
Density
of solid wax deposition kgfm3
Dimensionless weight function
Dimensionless weight function
Received: January 28, 2000
Accepted: March II 2000