Knut Olsen, Brent Ellerbroek, and Steve Strom Presentation to GSMT SWG, October 20, 2005

16
Chronicling the Histories of Galaxies at Distances of 1 to 20 Mpc: Simulated Performance of 20-m, 30-m, 50-m, and 100-m Telescopes Knut Olsen, Brent Ellerbroek, and Steve Strom Presentation to GSMT SWG, October 20, 2005

description

Chronicling the Histories of Galaxies at Distances of 1 to 20 Mpc: Simulated Performance of 20-m, 30-m, 50-m, and 100-m Telescopes. Knut Olsen, Brent Ellerbroek, and Steve Strom Presentation to GSMT SWG, October 20, 2005. Context. Hierarchical structure formation: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Knut Olsen, Brent Ellerbroek, and Steve Strom Presentation to GSMT SWG, October 20, 2005

Page 1: Knut Olsen, Brent Ellerbroek, and Steve Strom Presentation to GSMT SWG, October 20, 2005

Chronicling the Histories of Galaxies at Distances of 1 to 20 Mpc: Simulated Performance of 20-m, 30-m, 50-m, and 100-m TelescopesKnut Olsen, Brent Ellerbroek, and Steve Strom

Presentation to GSMT SWG, October 20, 2005

Page 2: Knut Olsen, Brent Ellerbroek, and Steve Strom Presentation to GSMT SWG, October 20, 2005

Context

Hierarchical structure formation:

Primordial fluctuations + CDM + collapse of DM halos, starting with the smallest

Explains:

•Large-scale structure (e.g. White & Rees 1978)

•The morphologies of galaxies (e.g. Kauffmann et al. 1993; Steinmetz & Navarro 2002)

•The globular cluster systems of elliptical galaxies and of the Milky Way halo (Beasley et al. 2002; Searle & Zinn 1978)

Mathis et al. (2002)

Page 3: Knut Olsen, Brent Ellerbroek, and Steve Strom Presentation to GSMT SWG, October 20, 2005

Dark matter Gas Stars

Galaxy formation physics

•Gas cooling

•Star formation

•Feedback

•Merging

Abadi et al. (2003)

320 kpc

40 kpc

Page 4: Knut Olsen, Brent Ellerbroek, and Steve Strom Presentation to GSMT SWG, October 20, 2005

The angular momentum problem of disk galaxy formation

•Early gas cooling in simulations leads to compact gas disks inside dark matter halos

•Every merger has the opportunity to transfer L outwards, so that baryons lose L to dark matter

Abadi et al. (2003)

Page 5: Knut Olsen, Brent Ellerbroek, and Steve Strom Presentation to GSMT SWG, October 20, 2005

The importance of star formation and feedback

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

•Feedback inhibits rapid collapse of gas

•Feedback regulates star formation

Robertson et al. (2004)

Page 6: Knut Olsen, Brent Ellerbroek, and Steve Strom Presentation to GSMT SWG, October 20, 2005

ELT Stellar Populations Science

•Near IR photometry of resolved stars in nearby galaxies provides a way to extract their entire star formation histories

Crowding, and hence aperture size, is the limiting factor

• Spectroscopy of individual stars supplements the photometric data with more accurate chemical abundance measurements

Sensitivity and crowding can both be limiting factors

M31 observed with Gemini N+NIRI/Altair (Olsen et al., in prep.)

Page 7: Knut Olsen, Brent Ellerbroek, and Steve Strom Presentation to GSMT SWG, October 20, 2005

QuickTime™ and aVideo decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Stellar Evolution in a Composite Population: M31

Model with constant star formation rate and stepwise increasing metallicity

Girardi et al. (2000) tracks

AO-corrected 8-m performance

Page 8: Knut Olsen, Brent Ellerbroek, and Steve Strom Presentation to GSMT SWG, October 20, 2005

Modeling crowding effects

V I

Crowding introduces photometric error through luminosity fluctuations within a single resolution element of the telescope due to the unresolved stellar sources in that element.

Page 9: Knut Olsen, Brent Ellerbroek, and Steve Strom Presentation to GSMT SWG, October 20, 2005

To calculate the effects of crowding on magnitudes and colors, we need only consider the Poisson statistics of the luminosity functions (e.g. Tonry & Schneider 1988)

For magnitudes:

For colors:

hi

8 8

Page 10: Knut Olsen, Brent Ellerbroek, and Steve Strom Presentation to GSMT SWG, October 20, 2005

30-m vs. 100-m: Analytical results

Magnitudes at which 10% photometry is possible in regions of surface brightness V=22, K=19 for galaxies at the indicated distances.

Page 11: Knut Olsen, Brent Ellerbroek, and Steve Strom Presentation to GSMT SWG, October 20, 2005

Issues

Photometric Issues:

Spatial variability of PSF

Time variability of PSF

Absolute calibration

Scientific Issues:

Sample size needed

Field size needed

Filters needed

Page 12: Knut Olsen, Brent Ellerbroek, and Steve Strom Presentation to GSMT SWG, October 20, 2005

PSF Simulation

• AO Error sources included

1. Finite number of guide stars and DMs

2. Finite spatial resolution of wavefront sensors and DMs

• Sampled on 49x49 20” wide grid in IJHK for 20-m, 30-m, 50-m, and 100-m telescopes

• Sampled over 12-minute average intervals from hour-long “typical” observation with TMT MASS/DIMM

• 5 atmospheric profiles 4 filters 49 (10) positions 4 telescopes = 3920 (800) PSFs

Page 13: Knut Olsen, Brent Ellerbroek, and Steve Strom Presentation to GSMT SWG, October 20, 2005

30-m J PSF grid, profile 1

PSF Simulation

Courtesy of Richard Clare

Page 14: Knut Olsen, Brent Ellerbroek, and Steve Strom Presentation to GSMT SWG, October 20, 2005

20-m to 100-m: Simulated scenes (in progress)

•M31 Bulge

•M31 Disk

•NGC 3379 effective radius

•NGC 3379 3x effective radius

Page 15: Knut Olsen, Brent Ellerbroek, and Steve Strom Presentation to GSMT SWG, October 20, 2005

QuickTime™ and aVideo decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Simulation procedure

•Select appropriate population mix

•Pick stars from stellar isochrones and place in image, making sure to simulate stars well below crowding limit

•Convolve image with PSFs (495 convolutions, combine through weighted average)

•Add sky background and noise

•Perform PSF-fitting photometry

•Correct photometry for Strehl ratio using profile 1 or average of profiles 1 and 5

•Derive best-fit population mix

Page 16: Knut Olsen, Brent Ellerbroek, and Steve Strom Presentation to GSMT SWG, October 20, 2005

Coming results

•Demonstrate ability of suite of ELTs to measure the formation epoch of disks vs. bulges vs. ellipticals

•Show effect of likely calibration errors on end results

•Quantify observing strategies

•Recommend instrument FOV, filters, and necessary sample sizes