“…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality...
description
Transcript of “…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality...
![Page 1: “…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality .”](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070420/56815f7a550346895dce83ff/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
“Without the understanding that Piaget deliberately stepped out of
the western philosophical tradition, it is impossible to come
to a comprehensive view of his theory of knowing and the model he built to explain how children
acquire knowledge.”
![Page 2: “…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality .”](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070420/56815f7a550346895dce83ff/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
“…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence
with an ontological reality.”
![Page 3: “…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality .”](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070420/56815f7a550346895dce83ff/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
1) What is Constructivism?
2) What makes radical constructivism different from constructivism?
![Page 4: “…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality .”](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070420/56815f7a550346895dce83ff/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
What is the nature of mathematics in Radical Constructivism?
![Page 5: “…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality .”](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070420/56815f7a550346895dce83ff/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Bonita is a 9th-grade algebra student. She is asked to solve some problems in an interview setting about a dripping faucet.
Int: Okay. Now let’s suppose that it drips 6 ounces in 8 minutes, and it’s going at the same speed, or same rate. How many ounces do you think it dripped in 4 minutes?
![Page 6: “…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality .”](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070420/56815f7a550346895dce83ff/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Bonita: Um, can I use your pen?Int: Uh huh. Oh, I hogged both of them.
Bonita: Could I use a calc – Int: You sure can! Now I think this is like
the ones you’ve used in class.
![Page 7: “…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality .”](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070420/56815f7a550346895dce83ff/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Bonita: Uh huh.Int: I’ll let you turn it on, you probably know
how to use it better than I do.
Bonita: Thank you. It, um, to be able – oh. It would be 3 ounces in 4 minutes.
![Page 8: “…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality .”](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070420/56815f7a550346895dce83ff/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
What does Bonita Understand?
![Page 9: “…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality .”](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070420/56815f7a550346895dce83ff/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Int: Let me give you one other problem, and
you can use that pen. And let’s just see
if there’s another way to do it. Like, can
you think about it without – the, there’s
nothing wrong with this, you did a great
job with that. But I just want to see if
there’s another way to do it too. So,
this time I’m gonna ask how many
ounces in 40 minutes?
![Page 10: “…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality .”](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070420/56815f7a550346895dce83ff/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Bonita: So you want me to try different rather
than this? Or…Int: Yeah.Bonita: (Unintelligible) there the same?Int: Can you do it in your head, or is there a
way to just think about it without using
a math formula?Bonita: Uh…Int: It’s okay if there isn’t. I just want you to
think about it a minute.
![Page 11: “…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality .”](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070420/56815f7a550346895dce83ff/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Bonita: I can’t do it in my head, it’s, it’s…Int: What if this was a 16 instead of a 40?
Could you do it in your head then? Ifit was, um, 6 ounces in 8 minutes, howmany ounces in 16 minutes?
Bonita: Um, I have problem with thinking of these, like, in my head. I don’t come upwith answers really quick, I have to, likeeither, get a calculator to…that’s not…
![Page 12: “…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality .”](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070420/56815f7a550346895dce83ff/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Int: Can you use a calculator, but not the formula?
Bonita: Hmm.Int: Is there any way to think about it?Bonita: Like without using this? (Points to the
cross-multiplication algorithm)Int: Uh huh.Bonita: Just like putting it in there?Int: Yeah just, just curious.Bonita: I don’t know how to…
![Page 13: “…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality .”](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070420/56815f7a550346895dce83ff/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
What does Bonita Understand?
![Page 14: “…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality .”](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070420/56815f7a550346895dce83ff/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Int: Now, let’s suppose you have two peopleLet’s put you and me. And we’re
eachwatching a little faucet. And, let’s
say weeach have a container here. And
let’s saythat you collected 3 ounces, and
I’vecollected 3 ounces. Are they
dripping theas fast as each other, or do you
think thatone could be dripping faster than
the other?
![Page 15: “…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality .”](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070420/56815f7a550346895dce83ff/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Bonita: Um, they’re dripping the same.Int: The same? What if mine took 10 minutes
and yours took 20 minutes. In other words,
you had to watch, sit and watch your clock
for 20 minutes to get the 3 ounces, but
mine filled 3 ounces in only 10 minutes?
![Page 16: “…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality .”](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070420/56815f7a550346895dce83ff/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Bonita: Um, this one (points to the left one) is going way faster and probably this
(pointsto the right one) is like, I don’t
know it’skind of going, like, fast and slow,
maybe?Int: Hmm. How’d you determine that? What
were you thinking?Bonita: Um.Int: What makes this one faster? (Points to the
left one).
![Page 17: “…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality .”](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070420/56815f7a550346895dce83ff/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Bonita: Um, makes it faster ‘cause it, it um, it beat
the, the 10 minutes…Int: Okay.Bonita: And this one (points to right one) as I said
it, it was going fast, or, and then slow, or,
the opposite way.
![Page 18: “…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality .”](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070420/56815f7a550346895dce83ff/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Int: Okay. Let’s put one more person in here.Have you got a friend’s name?
Bonita: Um, Andrea.Int: Andrea. That’s a pretty name. I have no
idea if I spelled it right, but…Bonita: Yeah.
![Page 19: “…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality .”](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070420/56815f7a550346895dce83ff/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Int: Let’s say that she collected…she stood there the same amount of time as
I did butshe collected 4 ounces instead of
3. Is herfaucet dripping at the same, same
fastnessas mine or is hers faster or slower
thanmine?
Bonita: Um, Andrea’s is faster.
![Page 20: “…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality .”](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070420/56815f7a550346895dce83ff/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
What does Bonita understand?
![Page 21: “…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality .”](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070420/56815f7a550346895dce83ff/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
1) What would an information processor say about Bonita’s math knowledge?2) What would a behaviorist say about Bonita’s math knowledge?3) What would a radical constructivist say about Bonita’s math knowledge?
![Page 22: “…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality .”](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070420/56815f7a550346895dce83ff/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
What is a rate?
![Page 23: “…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality .”](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070420/56815f7a550346895dce83ff/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
What is a Rate?
External perspective• A rate is the relationship of
two measurements with different units, like miles per hour.
• A rate is a “per 1” ratio, like 60 miles per hour.
Radical Constructivist Perspective• “A rate is a reflectively
abstracted constant ratio.” (Thompson & Thompson, 1992, p. 7)
• “A specific ratio in relation to the quantities compared to make it is a mental structure. A rate, as a reflectively abstracted constant ratio, symbolizes that structure as a whole, but gives prominence to the constancy of the result of the multiplicative comparison.”
![Page 24: “…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality .”](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070420/56815f7a550346895dce83ff/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
![Page 25: “…Knowledge, of its nature, cannot have any iconic correspondence with an ontological reality .”](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070420/56815f7a550346895dce83ff/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)