KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation
-
Upload
kelly-mcdonald -
Category
Documents
-
view
70 -
download
0
Transcript of KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation
![Page 1: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Physiological Decline and Recovery of Eastern Hemlock to Hemlock Woolly Adelgid (HWA)
Kelly McDonald1, John Seiler1,Scott Salom2,Rusty Rhea 3
1Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation2Department of Entomology3 USDA Forest Service Forest Health Protection Department
![Page 2: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Overall Goal
Characterize the physiological response of eastern hemlock to HWA
with a particular emphasis on the impact on carbon
uptake
Heavily infested tree recovering after treatment
![Page 3: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
WHY DO WE CARE?
William M. Ciesla, Forest Health Management International, Bugwood.org
![Page 4: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Predicted Range Expansion of HWA
Map produced by: USDA Forest Service
Randall MorinNortheastern Research Station
![Page 7: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
1. Determine the impact of HWA in hemlock needle physiology at sites with varying levels of HWA infestation.
2. Examine initial changes in needle physiology in response to treatment with imidacloprid.
3. Examine the impact of HWA on hemlock chlorophyll fluorescence.
4. Examine percent bud break on treated and untreated trees.
Specific Objectives
![Page 8: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Study Locations
Elevation ~3825
Elevation ~2010 ft
Elevation ~2000 ft
![Page 9: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
•Six replications
•Three tree size classes
•Treated and untreated with imidacloprid
•Treated plots 15m+ away from untreated plots Smallest size class tree being treated with
imidacloprid in summer of 2011
Design at Fishburn Forest & Mountain Lake
![Page 10: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
![Page 11: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Imidacloprid Treatment
•Kiortz Soil Injection of imidacloprid (Merit® 2 F, Bayer)
•Rate of 1.2 g (a.i.)/ 2.5 cm dbh
•Treatment Dates:-Fishburn Aug 2011-MLBS Nov 2011-Twin Falls Oct 2011 Medium size class tree being treated with
imidacloprid in summer of 2011
![Page 12: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
DBH Distribution
Small Medium Large0
7
14
21
28
35
DBH
(cm
)
Small Medium Large
TreatedUntreatedMLBSFishburn
![Page 13: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
•Ten replications
•Treated and untreated with imidacloprid
•No size classes
Hemlock in serious decline due to HWA
Design at Twin Falls State Park
![Page 14: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
DBH Distribution
Treated Untreated0
5
10
15
20
25
DBH
(cm
)
![Page 15: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Methods
![Page 16: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Leaf Gas ExchangeLi-Cor 6400 Open Portable Photosynthesis System
CO2R= 385 ppm Temp= ambient PAR= 1200 µmol m-2sec-1
![Page 17: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Gas Exchange•Fishburn & MLBS- measurements are taken on fully mature, attached foliage
•Twin Falls- measurements are taken on detached foliage
![Page 18: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Branch Removal
Attached Detached0 6 12 18 24 300
1
2
3
4
5
Time Since Removal (min)
Phot
osyn
thes
is (µ
mol
CO
2 m
-2 s-
1)
![Page 19: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Chlorophyll Fluorescence•Hansatech Handy PEA Meter
•15 min dark adaption
•Fv/Fm- Quantum Efficiency of PSII
![Page 20: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
% Bud Break•5 randomly selected branches on each side of tree
•~20 buds counted per branch
•Recorded Y/N for each bud
![Page 21: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Results
![Page 22: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
9/15/11 11/15/11 1/15/12 3/15/12 5/15/12 7/15/12 9/15/12 11/15/12 1/15/130
3
6
9Twin Falls
*
0
3
6
9MLBS
0
3
6
9
FishburnUntreatedTreated
Phot
osyn
thes
is (µ
mol
CO
2 m-2 s
-1 )
* **
****
*
=2.92 =3.16
=3.18 =3.31
=3.87 =4.10
![Page 23: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
0.760000000000001
0.790000000000001
0.820000000000001
0.850000000000001
0.880000000000001Fishburn Not
TreatedTreated
0.760000000000002
0.790000000000002
0.820000000000002
0.850000000000001
0.880000000000001MLBS **
**
Fv/F
m
![Page 24: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Fishburn MLBS0.760000000000001
0.790000000000001
0.820000000000001
0.850000000000001
0.880000000000001
TreatedNot Treated
Fv/F
m
Quantum Efficiency of PSII
![Page 25: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Fishburn MLBS0
20
40
60TreatedUntreated
% B
ud B
reak
Percent Bud Break
*
50%
![Page 26: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Conclusions
1. Determine the impact of HWA in hemlock needle physiology at sites with varying levels of HWA infestation.
• Ps rates similar between sites-Twin Falls averages highest Ps rates-MLBS averages lowest Ps rates
![Page 27: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Conclusions
2. Examine initial changes in needle physiology in response to treatment with imidacloprid.
• Treated trees tend to have higher Ps rates than untreated trees
• Treated trees:-highest average rate @ Twin Falls-lowest average rate @ MLBS
• Untreated trees:-highest average rate @ Twin Falls
-lowest average rate @ MLBS
![Page 28: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
3. Examine the impact of HWA on hemlock chlorophyll fluorescence.
• No difference between treated and untreated trees overall
• No difference in Fv/Fm between Fishburn & MLBS
4. Examine percent bud break on treated and untreated trees.
• % bud break much lower at Fishburn compared to MLBS• % bud break significantly higher for treated trees at
Fishburn
Conclusions
![Page 29: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Future Work
•Continue with gas exchange measurements through March
•Develop methods to use a Sunscan Plant Canopy Analyzer to get LAI estimates
-Correlate with: Hemiview photograph analysis Crown class score based on % foliage
•Run statistics in JMP- time series analysis-Covariates: soil moisture, tree age/size, min temps
![Page 30: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Acknowledgements
•John Peterson•Tom McAvoy•Tom McNamara•US Forest Service
![Page 31: KMcDonald_ Hemlock Presentation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051404/58841d0f1a28ab485c8b4b97/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Schedule
Complete fieldwork: April 15Organize data for statistical analysis: May 1Run Statistics: May 15Submit first draft: June 1Submit second draft: June 15Defend: July 1