Kirtland Schools State Report Card 2009

8/14/2019 Kirtland Schools State Report Card 2009

1/8

To meet a testindicator for grades

3-8 and10, atleast75%of students

tested must score proficientor higher

on that test. Other indicator requirements are:

11th grade Ohio Graduation Tests, 85%; Attendance

Rate, 93%; Graduation Rate, 90%.

StateIndicators

2008-2009 School Year Report Card

The state requirement is 75 percent








3rd Grade Achievement

1. Reading2. Mathematics

4th Grade Achievement

3. Reading

4. Mathematics

5. Writing


6. Reading

7. Mathematics

8. Science

9. Social Studies


10. Reading

11. Mathematics


12. Reading

13. Mathematics

14. Writing


15. Reading

16. Mathematics

17. Science

18. Social Studies

Ohio Graduation Tests (10th Grade)

19. Reading

20. Mathematics

21. Writing

22. Science23. Social Studies

Ohio Graduation Tests (11th Grade)

24. Reading

25. Mathematics

26. Writing

27. Science

28. Social Studies

Attendance Rate

29. All Grades

2007-08 Graduation Rate

30. District



The six designations are Excellent with Distinction Excellent Effective Continuous Improvement Academic Watch Academic Emergency

Value-AddedAdequateYearly Progress

PerformanceIndex

Indicators

The District Report Card for the2008-2009school year showsthe progress districts have madebased on four measures ofperformance.

The combination of the fourmeasures is the basis forassigning state designationsto districts, buildings andcommunity schools.

Your DistrictsDesignation: Number of State

IndicatorsMet out of 30

PerformanceIndex

StateIndicators Performance

Index

Value-AddedMeasure

Your District

2008-2009

Similar Districts

2008-2009

State

2008-2009

Percentage of Students at and above the Proficient Level

On the Web: reportcard.ohio.gov

Value-AddedMeasure

State

Indicators

District Improvement(0-120 points)

AYP

*

**

Any result at or above the state standard is indicated by a .

SimilarDistrictsare basedon comparingdemographic,socioeconomicand geographicfactors. Cumulative resultsfor studentswho tookthe testsas 10th or 11thgraders.***

-- =Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

97.1 %

98.5 %

96.2 %

98.7 %

IRN # 047878

Excellent28

103.4

Met

OK

Kirtland Local School District9252 Chillicothe Rd, Kirtland, OH 44094-9298 - Lake County

Current Superintendent: Stanley J. Lipinski (440) 256-3311

93.0 %92.9 %

87.2 %

95.2 %89.5 %

92.8 %

82.6 %

90.4 %

89.2 %

96.6 %

85.1 %

93.7 %

86.9 %

88.2 %

81.1 %

78.7 %

68.4 %

64.2 %

98.8 %

96.4 %

100.0 %

97.6 %98.8 %

90.6 %91.0 %

77.4 %81.3 %

93.6 %

91.5 %93.3 %

82 %

78.4 %84.4 %

85.4 %

77.0 %

86.4 %

78.8 %

72 %

62.3 %

70.6 %

61.6 %

81.3 %

75.2 %

91.7 %

88.5 %

76.6 %

74.3 %

80.5 %

89.7 %

88.2 %

91.0 %

72.4 %

70.6 %

62.8 %

51.1 %

86.2 %

85.7 %

78.6 %

68.7 %

84.5 %

81.4 %

89.7 %

76 %81.6 %

93.2 %

92.5 %

96.4 %

90.3 %92.2 %

92.8 %

88.4 %

93.2 %

84.2 %

88.6 %

94.3 %

84.6 %

97.8 %

96.3 %

98.0 %

95.1 %

96.3 %

95.8 %

97.2 %

+ = above


2/8


3/8

Overall CompositeScores reflect grade level and overall composite

ratings for the 2008-2009 school year.

Value-Added Measure

Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

Reading

Mathematics

On the Web: reportcard.ohio.gov

Your districts Value-Added rating represents the progress yourdistrict has made with its students since last school year.In contrast, achievement scores represent students performance at apoint in time. A score of Above indicates greater than one year of

progress has been achieved; Met indicates one year of progress has beenachieved; Below indicates less than one year of progress has been achieved.

Value-AddedMeasure

-

+ AboveExpected GrowthMetExpected Growth

BelowExpected Growth

=

=

=

Legend

Performance Index

Performance Level Across Grades3-8 and 10 for all Tested Subjects

(Includes every student enrolled in

the district for a full academic year)

X =WeightPercentage Points

Your Districts Performance Index

0.0

0.3

0.6

1.0

1.1

1.2

Untested

Limited

Basic

Proficient

Accelerated

Advanced

X

X

X

X

X

X

=

=

=

=

=

=

The PerformanceIndex reflects theachievementof everystudentenrolled for the full academic

year. The Performance Indexis a weighted average that includesall tested subjects and grades anduntested students. The greatestweight is given to advanced scores(1.2); the weights decrease for eachperformance level and a weight ofzero is given to untested students.This results in a scale from 0 to120points. The Performance Index can becompared across years to showdistrict achievement trends.

PerformanceIndex

2008-2009 2007-2008 2006-2007

Performance Index Over Time

0.0

2.3

9.0

29.8

31.6

27.2

0.7

5.4

29.8

34.8

32.7

103.4 103.6 103.0

103.4

Kirtland Local School District, Lake Coun

+

+ - -

+ + - +

0.0


4/8

4

Grades 3-8 and 10

Readingand

Mathematics

Adequate YearlyProgress

AllStude

nts

PercentProficient

PercentTested

Econo

mica

llyDisad

vantag

ed

Asian/P

acific

Islan

der

Black

,non

-Hisp

anic

Ameri

can I

ndian

/Alas

kaNativ

e

Hispa

nic

Multi-

Racia

l

White

,non

-Hisp

anic

Stude

ntswith

Disab

ilities

Limite

d Eng

lishProfic

ient

Reading

Mathematics

Reading

Mathematics

Graduation Rate*

Attendance Rate*

Legend

Not applicable.

NR

N/A

Met

Not Met

Not Required This indicator was not evaluated for this subgroup because the subgroup size was smaller than the minimum number needed to achieve a statistically

reliable result. 30 students is the minimum size for the proficiency and non-test indicators, while 40 is the minimum size for the participation rate indicators.

This subgroup met AYP for this indicator with its current year, two-year combined, Safe Harbor, or growth measure results.

This subgroup did not meet AYP for this indicator.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

ReadingProficiency:

MathematicsProficiency:

ReadingParticipation:

Mathematics

Participation:

AttendanceRate:

AYP Determinatio

by Indicator

GraduationRate:

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a federally required measure. Everyschooland district must meet AYP goals thatare set for Reading and Mathematics

Rate. These goals are applied to ten student groups: All Students,Economically Disadvantaged Students, Asian/Pacific IslanderStudents, Black, non-Hispanic Students, American Indian/AlaskaNative Students, Hispanic Students, Multi-Racial Students, White,

non-Hispanic Students, Students with Disabilities (IEP), and Students withLimited English Proficiency (LEP). If any one of these groups does not meet

Rate, or Graduation Rate, then the school or district does not meet AYP.Not meeting AYP for consecutive years will have both federal and stateconsequences. Federal consequences could include a school or district beingidentified for improvement. State consequences could include a reductionin the states rating designation.

AYP

AYP Determination

by Subgroup

AYPDetermination

for Your District:

This legend explains terms used in the above chart that describe whether each student group met this years AYP goals.

For test indicators, AYP can be met in one of four ways:

1) meeting the AYP targets with current year results;

2) meeting the AYP targets with two-year combined results;

3) meeting the improvement requirements of Safe Harbor;

4) meeting the AYP targets with projected results.

For non-test indicators, AYP can be met in one of three ways:

1) meeting the AYP targets with current year results;

2) meeting the AYP targets with two-year combined results;

3) making improvement over the previous year.

* The non-test indicators used for overall AYP (Attendance Rate and Graduation Rate)are evaluated only for the All Students subgroup.

Black,non-Hispanic

HispanicWhite,

non-Hispanic

Asian orPacific Islander

American Indian/Alaska Native

Econ.Disadvtgd

Limited EnglishProficient Multi-Racial

Federally RequiredGraduation Rate Information

The disaggregated graduation rates ofyour district are provided forinformational purposes onlyand are not used foryour AYPdetermination.

Students withDisabilities

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Kirtland Local School District, Lake County

Met

Met

NR

NR

Met

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

0% 0% >95% >95%

0% 0% >95% >95% >95%


5/8

Under the federalNo Child Left BehindAct, states are

required to reportcertain data aboutschools and teachers.Data presented hereare for reportingpurposes only andare not used in thecomputation of thestate designationfor districts andschools.


Reading

WritingMathematicsScienceSocial Studies

ReadingWritingMathematicsScienceSocial Studies

ReadingWritingMathematicsScience

Social Studies



Black,non-Hispanic

AmericanIndian/

Alaska Native

Asian orPacific

IslanderHispanic

Multi-Racial

White,non-Hispanic

Non-DisabledStudents

Studentswith

DisabilitiesMigrant

Non-Econ.

Disadvtgd

Econ.Disadvtgd

LimitedEnglish

ProficientFemale Male

Your District's Percentage of Students at Each Performance Level

Percentage of Students Scoring Limited

Percentage of Students Scoring Basic

Percentage of Students Scoring Proficient

Percentage of Students Scoring Accelerated

Percentage of Students Scoring Advanced

State and Federally Required District Information

Number of Limited English Proficient StudentsExcluded from Accountability Calculations

Your District State

All Schools inYour District

High-PovertySchools Locatedin Your District*

Low-PovertySchools Locatedin Your District*

Percentage of teachers with at least a Bachelors Degree

Percentage of teachers with at least a Masters Degree

Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondaryclasses not taught by highly qualified teachers

Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondaryclasses taught by properly certified teachers

Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondary classes taught byteachers with temporary, conditional or long-term substitute certification/licensure

*High-povertyschoolsare thoserankedin the topquartile based onthe percentage ofeconomicallydisadvantagedstudents. Low-poverty schoolsare thoserankedin thebottomquartile based onthe percent

ofeconomicallydisadvantagedstudents. Adistrict mayhavebuildingsin both quartiles, in just onequartile orin neither quartile.

Federally Required School Teacher Information


Average DailyStudent

Enrollment

Black,non-

Hispanic

AmericanIndian or

Alaska Native

Asian orPacific

IslanderHispanic Multi-Racial

White,non-

Hispanic

Studentswith

DisabilitiesMigrant

EconomicallyDisadvantaged

LimitedEnglish

Proficient

Your Districts Students 2008-2009

--

1136 -- -- -- -- 0.9% 97.9% 4.7% -- 8.9% --


100.0

49.2

0.0

100.0

99.3

59.3

1.8

98.7

----------

--

--------

--

--------

--

--------

--

--------

2.7

0.42.90.82.7

1.2

0.41.81.22.5

17.5

0.015.80.0

10.0

--

--------

2.7

0.43.11.23.2

2.8

0.02.80.00.0

1.6

0.02.91.63.2

--

--------

3.7

0.73.10.73.0

----------

----------

----------

----------

5.67.28.8

14.013.2

4.76.36.9

12.012.0

14.019.229.840.035.0

----------

5.07.39.2

13.812.6

13.910.55.6

21.435.7

----------

4.93.28.8

14.312.7

6.211.19.1

14.114.8

--------

--

--------

--

--------

--

--------

--

--------

--

34.435.031.023.3

16.0

34.034.031.324.1

16.6

42.146.226.320.0

10.0

--------

--

34.334.629.923.1

16.2

41.742.147.235.7

14.3

--------

--

29.928.630.323.8

19.0

39.340.531.423.7

13.3

----------

----------

----------

----------

----------

29.952.724.734.227.6

31.054.225.734.927.0

19.334.617.520.030.0

----------

29.653.124.633.627.1

36.142.130.635.728.6

----------

31.861.126.434.134.9

28.245.123.633.320.0

----------

--

--------

----------

----------

----------

----------

27.34.7

32.627.640.5

29.15.1

34.327.841.9

7.00.0

10.520.015.0

----------

28.44.6

33.328.340.9

5.65.3

13.97.1

21.4

----------

31.87.1

31.626.230.2

22.62.6

32.728.148.9

0.0 -- 0.0


6/8

6

Every school in SI has to create animprovement plan. If a school in SIreceives federal funds, it may have tooffer Public School Choice and/orSupplemental Educational Services.

Being in SI for three or more yearsrequires more extensive correctiveactions and, eventually, restructuring.

Generally, a school will enter SchoolImprovement (SI) after missing AYPfor two consecutive years, and it canexit SI only after meeting AYP for two

consecutive years.

Name of the School & Years in Improvement

Name of Schools Identified for Improvement and Years in Improvement Status

Schools in School Improvement

Measures of a Rigorous Curriculum for the Class of 2008

Measure 2007-08 Graduates Data Source

EMIS - EducationManagement Information Systemof the Ohio Department of Education

ACT College Entrance Exam - Nonprofit organization that administerstheACT college entrance test

College Board (SAT)- Nonprofit association that administers the SAT exam

AP - Advanced Placement, a program offering courses/exams that provide

students the opportunity to earn credit or advanced standing at colleges anduniversities

Legend

The Measures of a Rigorous Curriculum are intended toreport on the completion of a rigorous curriculum and otherindicators of studentsuccess thatensure students leaveschool with the knowledgeand skills needed to succeed in

college, careers and citizenship. These indicators pertain toschools that have any combination of grades10, 11 and 12.

The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),often referred to as The Nations Report Card, is the only nationallyrepresentative and continuingassesssubject areas. Schools and students within each stateare selected randomly to be a part of theassessment. Not all students in the state or in a particularschool take the assessment.

, and there are no individual student or even schoolsummary results. The assessments are conducted in mathematics, reading, science, writing,the arts, civics, economics, geography and U.S. history.

To view Ohios most recentNAEP results,

go to:

and search for key word N AEP

gov

98.7

Kirtland Local School District, Lake County

No Schools Identified for Improvement in District

1096

52

64.1

46.2

26.9

51.3

23

%

%

%

%

%


7/8

1. If a district meets AYP in the current year, it can berated no lower than Continuous Improvement.

2. If a district does not meet AYP for three consecutiveyears and in the current year it does not meet AYP inmore than one student group, it can be rated no

higher than Continuous Improvement.3. In all other cases, AYP has no effect on the

preliminary designation. Thus, the preliminary designationbecomes the final designation.

Once the preliminary designation is determined, Value-Added,the fourth measure in the accountability system, is evaluatedto determine the impact (if any) on the districts finaldesignation.

1. If your districts rating is restricted to ContinuousImprovement due to AYP, then Value-Added will have noimpact on the designation and the preliminary designationbecomes the final designation.

2. If your district experiences above expected growth for atleast two consecutive years, your districts finaldesignation will increase by one designation.

3. If your district experiences below expected growth for atleast three consecutive years, your districts finaldesignation will decrease by one designation.

The preliminary designation results from identifying thehigher value between the percentage of indicators met byyour district and your districts performance index. AYPthen is evaluated to determine its effect on the preliminarydesignation. There are three ways in which AYP can affectthe preliminary designation.

Determining Your District's Rating

Indicators Met Performance Index Score AYP Status Preliminary Designation94%-100% 100 to 120or

or

or

or

or

and

and

and

and

and

andand

Met or Not Met Excellent

75%-93.9%

0%-74.9%

50%-74.9%

31%-49.9%

0%-30.9%

90 to 99.9

80 to 89.9

0 to 89.9

70 to 79.9

0 to 69.9

Met or Not Met

Not Met

Not Met

Not Met

Met

Effective

Academic Watch

Academic Emergency

Continuous

Improvement

=

=

=

=

=

=

Preliminary Designation Value-Added Measure* Final Designation

Excellent

Effective

Continuous Improvement

Academic Watch

Academic Emergency

Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive yearsand

and

and

and

and

Excellent with Distinction

Effective

Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive years


Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years







Excellent


Academic Emergency

Academic Watch

Academic Emergency


Academic Watch

Effective

*In all other cases, including if your districts designation has been restricted to Continuous Improvement, then Value-Added will haveno impact on the designation and the preliminary designation becomes the final designation.

or

or

or

or

or

Determiningyour districts reportcard designationis a multi-stepprocess. Thefirst stepis to determinea preliminary designation,whichis basedon thefollowingcomponents:1)the percentageof indicators met, 2)theperformanceindex and 3)AYP determination.



8/8

8

Ohio Department of EducationReport Card Resources on the Web:

reportcard.ohio.govKirtland Local School District, Lake County

Kirtland Schools State Report Card 2009

Documents

Transcript of Kirtland Schools State Report Card 2009