Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

download Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

of 30

Transcript of Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    1/30

    P-Graph Approach to Carbon-Constrained

    Energy Planning Problems

    Raymond R. Tan1, Kathleen B. Aviso1, Dominic C.Y. Foo2

    1Chemical Engineering Department

    De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines2Chemical Engineering Department

    University of Nottingham Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia

    26th European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process

    Engineering, June 12 - 15, 2016 Portoro, Slovenia

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    2/30

    My co-authors

    26th European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process

    Engineering, June 12 - 15, 2016 Portoroz, Slovenia

    2

    Prof. Dominic C.Y. Foo

    University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus

    Prof. Raymond Tan

    De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    3/30

    Outline of Presentation

    Global Energy/Climate Scenario

    Generalized Source/Sink Model

    P-graph methodology

    Problem structure in planning CO2 abatement technologies

    Case study

    Results, Conclusions and Future work

    26th European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process

    Engineering, June 12 - 15, 2016 Portoroz, Slovenia

    3

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    4/30

    Exceeding the Limits(Rockstrom et al., 2009)

    Atmospheric CO2 levels

    now exceed 400 ppm

    Global GHG emissions

    continue to grow, fuelled

    by economic and

    demographic trends

    Climate change has

    complex links with other

    issues e.g.,

    biodiversity loss, water

    stress, land use

    26th European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process

    Engineering, June 12 - 15, 2016 Portoroz, Slovenia

    4

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    5/30

    Selected Energy Statistics

    Indicator Value Source

    Projected primary energy demand

    2040

    750 - 860 x 1018 J IEA (2015)

    Projected CO2 emissions in 2040 45 x 109 t/y EIA (2016)

    World petroleum reserves-to-

    production (R/P) ratio in 2001

    39 y BP (2002)

    Projected global consumption of oil,

    NG and coal in 2020

    255, 178 and 129 x

    1018 J

    EIA (2002)

    Estimated land requirement to

    supply bioenergy

    0.74-1.94 ha/capita Nonhebel (2005)

    26th European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process

    Engineering, June 12 - 15, 2016 Portoroz, Slovenia

    5

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    6/30

    Some Recent Energy Trends

    Strong demand growth for reliable, low-cost energy, especially inthe developing world, will continue for decades

    Nuclear energy has fallen into disfavor as a result of the

    Fukushima crisis in 2011

    Non-conventional gas is now accessible; CO2 emissions, ratherthan supply, will be the constraint to its use.

    Transport trends (EVs and HEVs) may cause shifts in patterns of

    energy use

    There still remain inherent limitations to various forms ofrenewable energy

    26th European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process

    Engineering, June 12 - 15, 2016 Portoroz, Slovenia

    6

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    7/30

    CO2 Abatement Technology Wedges(Source: International Energy Agency)

    26th European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process

    Engineering, June 12 - 15, 2016 Portoroz, Slovenia

    7

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    8/30

    8

    Basic Problem Pattern

    Minimize use of scarce, high-quality stream

    Each stream source has fixed quality and quantity characteristics

    Each stream demand has fixed quality and quantity requirements

    Quality index is inverse and follows a linear mixing rule

    26th European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process

    Engineering, June 12 - 15, 2016 Portoroz, Slovenia

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    9/30

    Source: A streamwhich containsthe targeted

    species. Eachsource has:Flowrate FiQuality QiQuality load:

    mi = Fi Qi

    Source/sink representation

    Sink: An existingprocess unit/equipment that canaccept a source.

    Each sink has:Flowrate FjQuality Qj where:Qj

    min Qj Qjmax

    Load capacity:mi = Fi Qi

    Source i

    j = 1

    j = 2

    Sinkj

    j = 3

    i = 1

    i = 2

    i= 3

    (El-Halwagi, 2006)

    26th European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process

    Engineering, June 12 - 15, 2016 Portoroz, Slovenia

    9

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    10/30

    Streams and Qualities in Pinch Analysis

    Flows Qualities Examples/Problems

    Heat Temperature

    Heat integration (1971, 1979)

    Total site integration (1984)

    Integration of thermal equipments (1982)

    Mass Concentration

    Mass integration (1989)

    Water/Hydrogen management(1994,1996)

    Pollution prevention/Treatment networks

    Mass Properties Recycle/reuse networks (2004)

    Steam Pressure Cogeneration (1993, 2008)

    Energy CO2 Carbon-constrained energy planning (2007)

    Mass Time Supply chain management (2002)

    Energy TimeStand-alone energy system (2007)

    Isolated power system (2007)

    26th European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process

    Engineering, June 12 - 15, 2016 Portoroz, Slovenia

    10

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    11/30

    11

    The Solution Strategy

    In the simplest case, the objective is to

    identify the minimum external resource

    needed by maximising use of internal

    sources.

    Problem components:

    Targeting identification of optimal

    resource budget

    Network design matching sources

    and sinks to achieve target

    i = 1

    i = 2

    i = 3

    i =NSR

    SOURCE

    j = 1

    j = 2

    j = 3

    j =NSK

    SINK

    26th European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process

    Engineering, June 12 - 15, 2016 Portoroz, Slovenia

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    12/30

    Optimization Model

    Objective Function

    Balance at Sink

    Balance at Source

    Quality Constraint

    26th European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process

    Engineering, June 12 - 15, 2016 Portoroz, Slovenia

    12

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    13/30

    P-graph Methodology

    Process graph or p-graph is a graph theoretic method

    developed for process network synthesis (Friedler et al., 1992,

    1993)

    P-graph utilizes 3 algorithms to identify the optimal network

    structure

    MSG maximal structure generation SSG solution structure generation

    ABB advanced branch and bound

    P-graph is a graphical representation of

    matrix calculations such as MILP Provides near optimal solutions

    13

    RM1

    P1

    RM2OPERATING UNIT

    26th European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process

    Engineering, June 12 - 15, 2016 Portoroz, Slovenia

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    14/30

    Recent applications of P-graph

    Application Authors

    Vehicle maintenance scheduling Adonyi et al. (2013)

    Industrial symbiosis networks Aviso et al., (2015a)

    Allocation of in economic systems during crises Aviso et al., (2015b)

    Planning of CO2 capture and storage systems Chong et al. (2014)

    Planning of building evacuation during

    emergenciesGarcia-Ojeda et al. (2012)

    Planning of supply chains in the Energy-Water-

    Food Nexus Heckl et al. (2015b)

    Open-structure biomass networks Lam et al. (2013)

    Renewable energy systems for cities Maier and Narodoslawsky (2014)

    Biomass supply chains with consideration of

    occupational safety Ng et al. (2015)

    Operation of polygeneration plants underabnormal conditions Tan et al. (2014)

    Inoperability risk allocation in urban infrastrcuture Tan et al. (2015)

    14

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    15/30

    Problem Statement

    There are Mnumber of energy sources with supply limit and

    specified CO2 intensity

    There are Nenergy demands with given energy requirement and

    maximum tolerable CO2 intensity

    A high quality energy source (e.g. zero CO2 intensity) is externally

    available

    Determine the optimal allocation of energy sources which minimizes

    the zero-carbon energy source and meets energy demand of sinks

    26th European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process

    Engineering, June 12 - 15, 2016 Portoroz, Slovenia

    15

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    16/30

    P-Graph Source-Sink Model

    SOURCE 1

    S1

    SOURCE 2

    S2

    DEMAND 1

    D1

    DEMAND 2

    D2

    Superstructure for 2 sources and

    2 sinks

    P-graph representation for 2

    sources and 2 sinks

    26th European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process

    Engineering, June 12 - 15, 2016 Portoroz, Slovenia

    16

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    17/30

    P-Graph Source-Sink Model

    26th European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process

    Engineering, June 12 - 15, 2016 Portoroz, Slovenia

    17

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    18/30

    P-Graph Source-Sink Model

    AvailableSource

    26th European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process

    Engineering, June 12 - 15, 2016 Portoroz, Slovenia

    18

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    19/30

    P-Graph Source-Sink Model

    Energy

    Demands 19

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    20/30

    P-Graph Source-Sink Model

    QualityConstraints

    26th European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process

    Engineering, June 12 - 15, 2016 Portoroz, Slovenia

    20

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    21/30

    P-Graph Source-Sink Model

    Flow ofresources

    26th European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process

    Engineering, June 12 - 15, 2016 Portoroz, Slovenia

    21

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    22/30

    Case Study(Tan and Foo, 2007)

    Energy Source Emission Factor

    (t CO2/TJ)

    Available Sources

    (TJ)

    Coal 105 600,00

    Oil 75 800,00

    Natural Gas 55 200,00

    Zero-carbon 0 > 400,00

    Total > 2,000,000

    Energy Demand Emission Limit

    (x 106 t CO2)

    Expected Consumption

    (TJ)

    Region 1 20 1,000,000

    Region 2 20 400,000

    Region 3 60 600,000

    Total 100 2,000,000

    26th European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process

    Engineering, June 12 - 15, 2016 Portoroz, Slovenia

    22

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    23/30

    P-graph Representation

    ZERO

    CARBON

    NATURAL

    GASOILCOAL

    REGION 3REGION 2REGION 1

    ENERGY

    SOURCE

    ENERGY

    DEMAND26th European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process

    Engineering, June 12 - 15, 2016 Portoroz, Slovenia

    23

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    24/30

    Optimal Solution

    Source Region 1

    (TJ)

    Region 2

    (TJ)

    Region 3

    (TJ)

    Total

    (TJ)

    Coal 0.00 0.00 186,667 186,667

    Oil 266,667 120,000 413,333 800,000

    Natural Gas 0.00 200,000 0.00 200,000

    Zero Carbon 733,333 80,000 0.00 813,333

    Total 1,000,000 400,000 600,000

    24

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    25/30

    Near Optimal Network

    Source Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Total

    Coal 0.00 0.00 540,000 540,000

    Oil 266,667 164,000 0.00 430,667

    Natural Gas 0.00 140,000 60,000 200,000

    Zero Carbon 733,333 96,000 0.00 829,333

    Total 1,000,000 400,000 600,000

    25

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    26/30

    Near Optimal Network

    Source Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Total

    Coal 0.00 0.00 540,000 540,000

    Oil 266,667 164,000 0.00 430,667

    Natural Gas 0.00 140,000 60,000 200,000

    Zero Carbon 733,333 96,000 0.00 829,333

    Total 1,000,000 400,000 600,000

    2%

    26

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    27/30

    Conclusions and Future Work

    The P-graph model is equivalent to alternative techniques (e.g.

    CEPA and linear programming)

    P-graph provides n-best solutions

    Alternative structures may be important in real life decision-making

    Future work will look into:

    integration of multiple quality indicators

    evaluation of robustness of alternative solutions

    extensions to other problem variants

    26th European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process

    Engineering, June 12 - 15, 2016 Portoroz, Slovenia

    27

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    28/30

    References

    Friedler, F., Tarjan, K., Huang, Y. W., and Fan, L. T.,1992a, Graph-theoretic approach to process

    synthesis: axioms and theorems. Chemical Engineering Science, 47: 1973-1988.

    Friedler, F., Tarjan, K., Huang, Y. W. and Fan, L. T., 1992b, Combinatorial algorithms for process

    synthesis. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 16: 313 320.

    Friedler, F., Tarjan, K., Huang, Y. W., & Fan, L. T., 1993, Graph-theoretic approach to process

    synthesis: polynomial algorithm for maximal structure generation. Computers & Chemical

    Engineering, 1993; 17: 929-942.

    Foo, D. C., Tan, R. R., and Ng, D. K. ,2008, Carbon and footprint-constrained energy planning using

    cascade analysis technique. Energy, 33(10), 1480-1488.Foo, D. C., Tan, R. R. (2015). A review on process integration techniques for carbon emissions and

    environmental footprint problems. Process Safety and Environmental Protection.

    Lam, H. L., 2013, Extended P-graph applications in supply chain and process network synthesis.

    Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 2(4), 475-486.

    Tan, R. R., and Foo, D. C., 2007, Pinch analysis approach to carbon-constrained energy sector

    planning. Energy, 32(8), 1422-1429.

    26th European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process

    Engineering, June 12 - 15, 2016 Portoroz, Slovenia

    28

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    29/30

  • 7/25/2019 Keynote lecture ESCAPE 2016

    30/30

    Thanks for your attention

    Comments and questions are welcome

    Or contact me via e-mail:

    Kathleen B. Aviso

    [email protected]

    30