Key players of the phytoplankton communities 5 µm 50 µm 0.5 µm50 µm.

16
Key players of the phytoplankton communities 5 µm 5 µm 50 µm 50 µm 0.5 µm 50 µm

TAGS:

Transcript of Key players of the phytoplankton communities 5 µm 50 µm 0.5 µm50 µm.

Page 1: Key players of the phytoplankton communities 5 µm 50 µm 0.5 µm50 µm.

Key players of the phytoplankton communities

5 µm 5 µm

50 µm 50 µm

0.5 µm

50 µm

Page 2: Key players of the phytoplankton communities 5 µm 50 µm 0.5 µm50 µm.

Key players of the phytoplankton communities

Page 3: Key players of the phytoplankton communities 5 µm 50 µm 0.5 µm50 µm.

Key players of the phytoplankton communities

M2

D6

D5D4

D3D2

D1

A5

A1

A11 B11

C11

C1B1

KERFIX

Page 4: Key players of the phytoplankton communities 5 µm 50 µm 0.5 µm50 µm.

Key players of the phytoplankton communities

N D J F M A M J Jt A S O N D J F M A M J Jt A S O N D J F

1992 1993 1994 1995

0

2

8

6

4

To

tal

cell

Car

bo

n,

µg

L-1

M2

Kopczynska E.E., Fiala M., and Jeandel C., Annual and interannual variability in phytoplankton at a permanent station off Kerguelen Islands, Southern Ocean, Polar Biology, 20 (5), 342-351, 1998.

Page 5: Key players of the phytoplankton communities 5 µm 50 µm 0.5 µm50 µm.

Key players of the phytoplankton communities

N D J F M A M J Jt A S O N D J F M A M J Jt A S O N D J F

1992 1993 1994 1995

0

2

8

6

4

To

tal

cell

Car

bo

n,

µg

L-1

0

20

40

60

80

100A

lgal

gro

up

sas

% o

f to

tal

cell

C

Kopczynska et al., 1998

Page 6: Key players of the phytoplankton communities 5 µm 50 µm 0.5 µm50 µm.

Key players of the phytoplankton communities

N D J F M A M J Jt A S O N D J F M A M J Jt A S O N D J F

1992 1993 1994 1995

0

20

40

60

80

100A

lgal

gro

up

sas

% o

f to

tal

cell

C

Diatoms

total Dinoflagellates

naked flagellates

picoplankton

Coccolithophorids

Kopczynska et al., 1998

Page 7: Key players of the phytoplankton communities 5 µm 50 µm 0.5 µm50 µm.

Key players of the phytoplankton communities

N D J F M A M J Jt A S O N D J F M A M J Jt A S O N D J F

1992 1993 1994 1995

0

20

40

60

80

100A

lgal

gro

up

sas

% o

f to

tal

cell

C

Diatoms

Kopczynska et al., 1998

• low contribution• dominant species : Fragilariopsis kerguelensis,

Thalassionema nitzschioides

Page 8: Key players of the phytoplankton communities 5 µm 50 µm 0.5 µm50 µm.

• highest contribution

• dominant species : Prorocentrum spp., Gymnodinium spp., heterotrophic species of Protoperidium spp. and Gyrodinium spp. during summer.

total Dinoflagellates

Key players of the phytoplankton communities

N D J F M A M J Jt A S O N D J F M A M J Jt A S O N D J F

1992 1993 1994 1995

0

20

40

60

80

100A

lgal

gro

up

sas

% o

f to

tal

cell

C

Kopczynska et al., 1998

Page 9: Key players of the phytoplankton communities 5 µm 50 µm 0.5 µm50 µm.

Key players of the phytoplankton communities

N D J F M A M J Jt A S O N D J F M A M J Jt A S O N D J F

1992 1993 1994 1995

0

20

40

60

80

100A

lgal

gro

up

sas

% o

f to

tal

cell

C

naked flagellates

Kopczynska et al., 1998

• low contribution during biomass peaks

• dominant groups : Prymnesiophyceae (Chrysochromulina spp.), Prasinophyceae (Pyramimonas spp.), and Cryptophyceae (Hillea fusiformis)

Page 10: Key players of the phytoplankton communities 5 µm 50 µm 0.5 µm50 µm.

• occasionally abundant• dominant species :

Coccolithophorids

Key players of the phytoplankton communities

N D J F M A M J Jt A S O N D J F M A M J Jt A S O N D J F

1992 1993 1994 1995

0

20

40

60

80

100A

lgal

gro

up

sas

% o

f to

tal

cell

C

Emiliania huxleyi

Kopczynska et al., 1998

Page 11: Key players of the phytoplankton communities 5 µm 50 µm 0.5 µm50 µm.

Surface temperatures (> 2°C) are compatible with Emiliania huxleyi and Fragilariopsis kerguelensis

Key players of the phytoplankton communities

Page 12: Key players of the phytoplankton communities 5 µm 50 µm 0.5 µm50 µm.

Key players of the phytoplankton communities

M2

Blain S., Tréguer P., Belviso S., Bucciarellia E., Denis M., Desabre S., Fiala M., Martin Jézéquel V., Le Fèvre J., Mayzaud P., Marty J.-C., and Razouls S., A biogeochemical study of the island mass effect in the context of the iron hypothesis: Kerguelen Islands, Southern Ocean, Deep-Sea Research, 48 (1), 163-187, 2001.

Page 13: Key players of the phytoplankton communities 5 µm 50 µm 0.5 µm50 µm.

Key players of the phytoplankton communities

Blain et al., 2001 – 4-10 October 1995

Page 14: Key players of the phytoplankton communities 5 µm 50 µm 0.5 µm50 µm.

Objective 3 : Knowledge and quantification of biogeochemical processes and their responses to changes in the forcing parameters.

3.1) Structure of phytoplankton communities. KEOPS will address the question "what physical and chemical factors regulate phytoplankton growth and species composition?"

3.2) Shifts in the structure of the phytoplankton communities in response to changes in the forcing parameters. (KEOPS will focus on the following forcing parameters: iron, light (visible and UV), stratification.

3.3) Do biological activity compete with photochemical processes for the production of biogenic gases and iron speciation?

Key players of the phytoplankton communities

Page 15: Key players of the phytoplankton communities 5 µm 50 µm 0.5 µm50 µm.

3.1) Structure of phytoplankton communities. KEOPS will address the question "what physical and chemical factors regulate phytoplankton growth and species composition?" Detailed topics include:

3.1.1) Characterization of phytoplankton communities in contrasted environments. Special attention will be paid to the major biogeochemical players: diatoms, Phaeocystis, coccolithophorids, cryptophyceans and picoplankton.

3.1.2) Identification, hierarchisation, and parameterization of the processes that control the structure of the phytoplankton communities.

3.1.3) Impact of the structure of the phytoplankton community on the fluxes of chemical compounds that are relevant for climate.

3.1.4) Impact of the structure of the phytoplankton community on the flux of carbon exported below the depth of the mixed layer

Objective 3 : Knowledge and quantification of biogeochemical processes and their responses to changes in the forcing parameters.

Key players of the phytoplankton communities

Page 16: Key players of the phytoplankton communities 5 µm 50 µm 0.5 µm50 µm.

3.2) Shifts in the structure of the phytoplankton communities in response to changes in the forcing parameters. (KEOPS will focus on the following forcing parameters: iron, light (visible and UV), stratification. The processes will be investigated mainly in the surface layer.

3.2.1) How will the forcing parameters impact the processes controlling the production of chemical compounds that are relevant for climate?

3.2.2) How will the forcing parameters impact the processes controlling the export of carbon below the depth of the mixed layer?

3.2.3) What is the feedback of biological activity on iron speciation?

Objective 3 : Knowledge and quantification of biogeochemical processes and their responses to changes in the forcing parameters.

Key players of the phytoplankton communities


volume ~ 1 µm x 1 µm x 1 µm

volume ~ 1 µm x 1 µm x 1 µm

Fluke 971Temperature Humidity Meter - AresAgante, Lda. · 2015-01-12 · Specifications Six size channels 0.3 µm, 0.5 µm, 1.0 µm, 2.0 µm, 5.0 µm, 10.0 µm Flow rate 2.83 L/min

Fluke 971Temperature Humidity Meter - AresAgante, Lda. · 2015-01-12 · Specifications Six size channels 0.3 µm, 0.5 µm, 1.0 µm, 2.0 µm, 5.0 µm, 10.0 µm Flow rate 2.83 L/min

Manufacture and Characterization of Graphene Membranes ... · 5 µm × 5 µm × 16.4 µm to 100 µm × 100 µm × 16.4 µm in size.Our approach is compatible with wafer-scale MEMS

Manufacture and Characterization of Graphene Membranes ... · 5 µm × 5 µm × 16.4 µm to 100 µm × 100 µm × 16.4 µm in size.Our approach is compatible with wafer-scale MEMS

Monoliths Modified with Nanoparticles for …Fused-Core® silica particles are designed with a 1.7 µm solid core and a 0.5 µm thick porous layer to yield 90 Å and 160 Å size pores.

Monoliths Modified with Nanoparticles for …Fused-Core® silica particles are designed with a 1.7 µm solid core and a 0.5 µm thick porous layer to yield 90 Å and 160 Å size pores.

OOSAFE IVF LABORATORY GARMENTS - dmdevsites.com · management finished fabric filter particles up to 65 % (0.3 µm) and 72 %(0.5 µm). Oosafe® IVF Laboratory Garments are made of

OOSAFE IVF LABORATORY GARMENTS - dmdevsites.com · management finished fabric filter particles up to 65 % (0.3 µm) and 72 %(0.5 µm). Oosafe® IVF Laboratory Garments are made of

Excessive ERK-dependent synaptic clustering drives ...within 5-10 µm of another new spine (3.0±0.5 vs. 1.6±0.5 spines/1000µm, though this certified by peer review) is the author/funder.

Excessive ERK-dependent synaptic clustering drives ...within 5-10 µm of another new spine (3.0±0.5 vs. 1.6±0.5 spines/1000µm, though this certified by peer review) is the author/funder.

Marines Phytoplankton* mit Nährstoff Analyse (*Meeres ... · PDF fileMarines Phytoplankton* mit Nährstoff Analyse (*Meeres Phytoplankton) 1 Das Marine Phytoplankton Jetzt von Experten

Marines Phytoplankton* mit Nährstoff Analyse (*Meeres ... · PDF fileMarines Phytoplankton* mit Nährstoff Analyse (*Meeres Phytoplankton) 1 Das Marine Phytoplankton Jetzt von Experten

M=1.33 1.45 1.59 0.1 µm 0.2 0.3 0.4 White light. 0.5 µm 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 µm X=10 M=1.33 1.45 1.59.

M=1.33 1.45 1.59 0.1 µm 0.2 0.3 0.4 White light. 0.5 µm 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 µm X=10 M=1.33 1.45 1.59.

Les Principes de Filtration | Présentation I.C.V. · 2016-07-01 · Le spectre de filtration Microfiltration Ultrafiltration 70 µm/50 µm/20 µm 8 µm/5 µm/3 µm 1 µm/0.8 µm/0.65

Les Principes de Filtration | Présentation I.C.V. · 2016-07-01 · Le spectre de filtration Microfiltration Ultrafiltration 70 µm/50 µm/20 µm 8 µm/5 µm/3 µm 1 µm/0.8 µm/0.65

B. abortus as viewed by electron microscopy. abortus as viewed by electron microscopy Cells are approximately 0.5-0.7 µm in diameter and 0.6-1.5 µm in length Brucella Establishment

B. abortus as viewed by electron microscopy. abortus as viewed by electron microscopy Cells are approximately 0.5-0.7 µm in diameter and 0.6-1.5 µm in length Brucella Establishment

GRAZER INDUCED RESPONSES IN MARINE PHYTOPLANKTON · Phytoplankton are the most important primary (Wolfe 2000) producers in the oceans, and even though they constitute less than 0.5%

GRAZER INDUCED RESPONSES IN MARINE PHYTOPLANKTON · Phytoplankton are the most important primary (Wolfe 2000) producers in the oceans, and even though they constitute less than 0.5%

Presentación de PowerPoint - Grepalma · 2018. 9. 20. · Microrganismos del Suelo virus(0.02 x 0.3 µm) Bacterias (0.5 x 1.5 µm) Actinomicetos (0.5 –2.0 *) Hongos (8.0*) Protozoarios

Presentación de PowerPoint - Grepalma · 2018. 9. 20. · Microrganismos del Suelo virus(0.02 x 0.3 µm) Bacterias (0.5 x 1.5 µm) Actinomicetos (0.5 –2.0 *) Hongos (8.0*) Protozoarios

CATALOG - BioClean Essentials Catalog Cleanroom... · BioClean Pharma Covers BPC 57 ... Ms. G. Love the Mother of all ... 0.1 µm 0.2 µm 0.3 µm 0.5 µm 1.0 µm 5.0 µm ISO Class

CATALOG - BioClean Essentials Catalog Cleanroom... · BioClean Pharma Covers BPC 57 ... Ms. G. Love the Mother of all ... 0.1 µm 0.2 µm 0.3 µm 0.5 µm 1.0 µm 5.0 µm ISO Class

Picot13,183-206,24pgs 8/17/04 11:01 AM Page 183 · Retinoic acid 5 × 10–8 M Sigma-Aldrich R2625 Phosphorylethanolamine 0.5 µM Sigma-Aldrich P0503 Ethanolamine 0.5 µM Sigma-Aldrich

Picot13,183-206,24pgs 8/17/04 11:01 AM Page 183 · Retinoic acid 5 × 10–8 M Sigma-Aldrich R2625 Phosphorylethanolamine 0.5 µM Sigma-Aldrich P0503 Ethanolamine 0.5 µM Sigma-Aldrich

GDD - Production guide v41 · 2020. 6. 4. · Shielding Aluminium (10 µm) GDD GEM foils (50 µm) 50 µm thick kapton, 5 µm copper, 70 µm hole diam., 140 µm pitch EST Drift 2 µm

GDD - Production guide v41 · 2020. 6. 4. · Shielding Aluminium (10 µm) GDD GEM foils (50 µm) 50 µm thick kapton, 5 µm copper, 70 µm hole diam., 140 µm pitch EST Drift 2 µm

ISO 16890 Get the full picture on filter performance....1 µm and PM10 2 µm 3 µm 4 µm 5 µm 6 µm 7 µm 8 µm 9 µm 10 µm 0 µm 1 µm So you get the full picture of how a filter

ISO 16890 Get the full picture on filter performance....1 µm and PM10 2 µm 3 µm 4 µm 5 µm 6 µm 7 µm 8 µm 9 µm 10 µm 0 µm 1 µm So you get the full picture of how a filter

Ecology of Phytoplankton - Cambridge University Pressassets.cambridge.org/97805218/44130/frontmatter/9780521844130... · Ecology of Phytoplankton Phytoplankton communities dominate

Ecology of Phytoplankton - Cambridge University Pressassets.cambridge.org/97805218/44130/frontmatter/9780521844130... · Ecology of Phytoplankton Phytoplankton communities dominate

Reconstructing the Human Renal Vascular–Tubular Unit In Vitro · of 3.1 µm (n = 7, SEM = 0.8µm), and a minimum thickness of 0.5 µm after 14 d of culture (p< 0.0001) (Figure 2i).

Reconstructing the Human Renal Vascular–Tubular Unit In Vitro · of 3.1 µm (n = 7, SEM = 0.8µm), and a minimum thickness of 0.5 µm after 14 d of culture (p< 0.0001) (Figure 2i).

C190-E206A Shim-pack HPLC Column Guidebook4 5 1.6 µm, 2.2 µm 1.9 µm, 2 µm, 2.2 µm, 3 µm ≥ 3 µm 5 µm, 10 µm 15 µm Analytical Columns High-Speed Analysis Conventional Analysis

C190-E206A Shim-pack HPLC Column Guidebook4 5 1.6 µm, 2.2 µm 1.9 µm, 2 µm, 2.2 µm, 3 µm ≥ 3 µm 5 µm, 10 µm 15 µm Analytical Columns High-Speed Analysis Conventional Analysis

Fig. 19-1 0.5 µm Chapter 19. Fig. 19-9 (a) The 1918 flu pandemic (b) Influenza A H5N1 virus (c) Vaccinating ducks 0.5 µm.

Fig. 19-1 0.5 µm Chapter 19. Fig. 19-9 (a) The 1918 flu pandemic (b) Influenza A H5N1 virus (c) Vaccinating ducks 0.5 µm.