Key factors in the successful roll-out of ERTMS on ... · Key factors in the successful roll-out of...

1Deutsche Bahn AG, Klaus Junker, VB, July 2007

UIC ERTMS World Conference in Berne, 11-13 September 2007

Key factorsin the successful roll-out

of ERTMS on international Corridors

Frankfurt, 24.07.2007

Member of the Management Committee Corridor A

Klaus Junker, VB, DB AG

VB, Delegate of DB AG

http://www.railfaneurope.net/pix/ch/SBB_CFF_FFS/electric/Re482/SBB-Cargo/020-029/482_022_RBL.jpg

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild:Railion_189100.jpg

http://www.bahnbilder.de/name/einzelbild/number/18768/kategorie/Italien%7EE-Loks%7EE+656.html

http://www.bahnbilder.de/name/einzelbild/number/81893/kategorie/Schweiz%7EBLS+Bern-L%F6tschberg-Simplon-Bahn%7EL%F6tschberg-Nordrampe.html


Key factors in the successful roll-out of ERTMS on international corridors

Frankfurt, 24.07.2007

Member of the Management Committee Corridor A

Klaus Junker, VB, DB AG

VB, Delegate of DB AG

TEN corridors in Europe

• Main railway corridors in Europe• ATC systems deployed in Europe today• Railway corridors in the European Union• General corridor approach by objectives

Key factors in the successful roll-out of ERTMS

• Organisation of corridor management• System & product requirements• Implementation schedule• Organisation of testing & approval

Conclusion

UIC ERTMS World Conference 2007


In the early 1990s, the idea of a European Rail Transport Management System was born and subsequently pursued



A wide variety of ATC and traction power systems are still used across Europe

BR

NS

SNCB/

NMBS

PKP

SNCF

MAVSBB/CFF/FFS ÖBB

CD

DSB

SNCFR

BDZ

RZD

FS

OSE

NSB SJ

VR

DB AG

CFL

JZ

HZSZ

RENFECP

UZ

EVR

LDZ

LG

CFM

BZD

ZBH

ZSR

IE

HSH

EBICAB 700/L 10000

EBICAB 900

ZUB 123AWS

ATB/ATB-NG

TVM/KVB

ASFA/LZB

EBICAB 700

SIGNUMZUB

BACC/SCMT

EVM

SHP

IINDUSI / LZB

INDUSI/LZB

TBL

LS 90

Not electrified

DC conductor rail

1,5 kV DC

3 kV DC

15 kV 16 2/3 Hz

25 kV 50 Hz

3 kV DC/ 25 kV 50 Hz

ATC Systems

Multi-system rolling stock and equipment is

required for international cross-

border traffic

I n e f f i c i e n t



The ERTMS corridors are defined in the EC/ERA MOU signed on 17 March 2005 as the future strategy guiding rail freight transport policy objectives

Corridor A: Rotterdam-GenoaCorridor B: Naples-StockholmCorridor C: Antwerp-LyonCorridor D: Valencia-LjubljanaCorridor E: Dresden-PragueCorridor F: Aachen-Warsaw



Corridor A is the most important in relative terms because of its very high transport volumes, which are expected to double by 2020

Transport volume (2006)Corridor A

– international 35 mt– national 115 mt

Total 150 mtCorridor C

– Basle branch 7,2 t mt– Lyon branch 3,6 mt

Total 10,8 mt

Corridor length (geographical)Corridor A 1300 kmCorridor C 770 km

Travel time (2006)Corridor A ~ 25 hCorridor C ~ 14 h

Source: "ERTMS implementation: getting a European corridor solution, Comparison between the Corridors A and C“,24. Aug. 2006

Corridor A: Rotterdam-GenoaCorridor B: Naples-StockholmCorridor C: Antwerp-LyonCorridor D: Valencia - LjubljanaCorridor E: Dresden-PragueCorridor F: Aachen-Warsaw



Each corridor must define its own objectives and means of improvement in order to meet future transport demand in Europe

Technical parameterse.g.

travel time, axle load, train length etc.

Competitivenesse.g.

Interoperability, more capacity, lower cost

etc.

Social/ecological benefits

noise, pollution, energy etc.

30% Quality

30% Capacity

30% Transport time

30% Cost

++--

Achievements

“30% improvement”

Anticipated future objectivesAreas for improvement



Key factors in the successful roll-out of ERTMS

System & product requirements

...only now can

the entire corridor

be a success

Organisation of corridor management

Organisation of testing & approvalImplementation schedule



Organisation of corridor management

Key factors in the successful roll-out of ETCS

Commitmentof all parties to the

Common Corridor Goalsintegrated management

of communication,risks & chances

..support & coordinationof corridor issues at

European level

..full coordination ofcorridor interfaces

..full integration of corridor activities

..scheduling ofcorridor programme and optimisation of baseline

..monitoring & consolidationof progress on corridors

The whole corridor must be managed in a unified way to ensure shared successThe whole corridor must be managed in a unified way to ensure shared success


Organisation of management for Corridor A


Integration of all corridor stakeholders & unified action will produce common resultsIntegration of all corridor stakeholders & unified action will produce common results


The complexity of a corridor means ETCS must be managed as an integrated system The complexity of a corridor means ETCS must be managed as an integrated system


ETCS system requirements on the Rotterdam – Genoa Corridor

* (partial migration by temporary use of Level 1 limited supervision)

MANNHEIM

OFFENBURG

FREIBURG

BAS-FRE

KARLSRUHE

BIBLISGROSS GERAU

KOBLENZ

BONNKOLN

DUSSELDORFOBERHAUSEN

EMMERICH

GENOAOVADA

KIJFHOEKk

ROTTERDAM

OLTENARTH -GOLDAUBERN

THUN

BRIG

NOVARA

SEREGNO

ALESSANDRIA

DOMODOSSOLA LUINO

GALLARATE

CHIASSO

MORTARA

BERGAMO

CREMONAPAVIAVOGHERA

PIACENZATORTONA

ZENENAR

2012 2.2.2c ETCS Level 2+Crs ETCS Level 2 Zevenaar -Border

2012 3.0.0 ETCS Level 2

2015 3.0.0 ETCS Level 2*

2012 3.0.0 ETCS Level 2*

2007 2.2.2c ETCS Level 2 Lötschberg2007 2.2.2c ETCS Level 2 Matt -Rothrist2011 P 44 & ETM completed2012 3.0.0 ETCS L1 Limited Supervision

2010 3.0.0 ETCS Level 1 Radio infill

2015 3.0.0 ETCS Level 1 additional line

NL

D

CH

I

SRS

Total length :

2123 km

NL

D

CH

I

MANNHEIM

OFFENBURG

FREIBURG

BAS-FRE

KARLSRUHE

BIBLISGROSS GERAU

KOBLENZ

BONNKOLN


EMMERICH

GENOAOVADA

KIJFHOEKk

ROTTERDAM


THUN

BRIG

NOVARA

SEREGNO

ALESSANDRIA

DOMODOSSOLA LUINO

GALLARATE

CHIASSO

MORTARA

BERGAMO

CREMONAPAVIAVOGHERA

PIACENZATORTONA

ZENENAR

MANNHEIM

OFFENBURG

FREIBURG

BAS-FRE

KARLSRUHE

BIBLISGROSS GERAU

KOBLENZ

BONNKOLN


EMMERICH

GENOAOVADA

KIJFHOEKk

ROTTERDAM


THUN

BRIG

NOVARA

SEREGNO

ALESSANDRIA

DOMODOSSOLA LUINO

GALLARATE

CHIASSO

MORTARA

BERGAMO

CREMONAPAVIAVOGHERA

PIACENZATORTONA

ZENENAR

2012 2.2.2c ETCS Level 2+Crs ETCS Level 2 Zevenaar - border

2012 3.0.0 ETCS Level 2*

2015 3.0.0 ETCS Level 2*

2012 3.0.0 ETCS Level 2*

2007 2.2.2c ETCS Level 2 Lötschberg2007 2.2.2c ETCS Level 2 Matt - Rothrist2011 P 44 & ETM completed2012 3.0.0 ETCS L1 limited supervision

2010 3.0.0 ETCS Level 1 radio infill

2015 3.0.0 ETCS Level 1 additional line

NL

D

CH

I

SRS

Total length :

2123 km

NL

D

CH

I



..go live,§ 2 EIV

..inter-operability

..inputsituation

..versionmgmt.

..designfreeze .. Operational Requirements Specifications & corridor rules

..Assessment of the corridor’s functional system requirements

..Assessment of all prerequisites for ETCS engineering, installation & tests

..Preparation of common tender specifications for HW & SW interfaces

..Development of harmonised test & approval procedures


Expert working groups needed to liaise closely at EU & manufacturer levelExpert working groups needed to liaise closely at EU & manufacturer level

..imple-mentation ..compatibility of HW & SW is essential for economic roll-out process



SRS. 2.3.015 Feb. 2007European law

SRS. 2.3.0 + 70 change requests(Selected by corridor 2007 group)

47 additional change requests(to be assessed by triage)

about 240 CRs, DCs, fault corrections

Consolidation

&

Developm

ent Process

SRS. 3.0.0


The corridor must not become a testing & development groundThe corridor must not become a testing & development ground



Implementation Schedule

Time forinstallation & tests

Time slot requirements

Inclusion of

time slots in

schedule

Time for systems integration tests

Time for upgradesTime for lab

tests

Time for declaration of approval

Time for interoperability

tests

Time for commissioning

How does this fit together? Realistic schedule to be confirmed by all partiesHow does this fit together? Realistic schedule to be confirmed by all parties


Testing & approvals must be integrated and closely monitored by a joint corridor steering body which is highly competent and capable of providing strong leadershipTesting & approvals must be integrated and closely monitored by a joint corridor steering body which is highly competent and capable of providing strong leadership

Organisation of testing & acceptance


..sharing test experiences & improvements

..early and close involvement of all

NBCs & contractors

..scheduling of cross-border & IOP

tests

Competence Centrefor Corridor

Testing & Approval

..step-by-step programming of

corridor tests

..coordination of test labs, simulators

and locos

..day-by-day monitoring of test results & upgrades

..coordination of technical & operational

solutions

..supervision of approvals & certification



The standard roll-out will require revision in the light of initial experiencesThe standard roll-out will require revision in the light of initial experiences

Standard roll-out for a given section



Extensive lab tests help reduce dependency on installations & operationsExtensive lab tests help reduce dependency on installations & operations

Standard testing scenario

Manufacturer – A - TrackConformity Declaration & Hand Over to IM ( HdF)

ACCEPT.

SAFETY

Acceptance Declaration §2EIV (EBA)/Start of Operations Track A

EU-CERT

ACCEPT.

SAFETY

EU-CERT

IOT-Tests in Laboratory (90 %)• Track A with Loko A• Track A with Loko B

Transitions-Tests in the field (10%)Track A & B with Loco A & B

1-2 Month

Manufacturer – B - TrackConformity Declaration & Hand Over to IM ( HdF)

IOT-Tests in Laboratory (90 %)• Track B with Loko B• Track B with Loko A

3 – 6 Month

Acceptance Declaration §2EIV (EBA)/Start of Operations Track B

Manufacturer – A - TrackConformity Declaration & Hand Over to IM ( HdF)

ACCEPT.

SAFETY

Acceptance Declaration §2EIV (EBA)/Start of Operations Track A

EU-CERT

ACCEPT.

SAFETY

EU-CERT

IOT-Tests in Laboratory (90 %)• Track A with Loko A• Track A with Loko B

Transitions-Tests in the field (10%)Track A & B with Loco A & B

1-2 Month

Manufacturer – B - TrackConformity Declaration & Hand Over to IM ( HdF)

IOT-Tests in Laboratory (90 %)• Track B with Loko B• Track B with Loko A

3 – 6 Month

Acceptance Declaration §2EIV (EBA)/Start of Operations Track B



Systems integration

Integration of infrastructure & ETCS is absolutely vital and requires early attention Integration of infrastructure & ETCS is absolutely vital and requires early attention


Conclusion


The first factor in guaranteeing success will be the experience gained during roll-out of the first corridorThe first factor in guaranteeing success will be the

experience gained during roll-out of the first corridor

Key factors in the successful roll-out of ERTMS on ... · Key factors in the successful roll-out of...

Documents

Transcript of Key factors in the successful roll-out of ERTMS on ... · Key factors in the successful roll-out of...