Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

27
1 Using Integrative Passive Samplers to Monitor Current- Use and Legacy Pesticides in San Francisco Bay, CA Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA April 24, 2007

description

Using Integrative Passive Samplers to Monitor Current-Use and Legacy Pesticides in San Francisco Bay, CA. Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA April 24, 2007. Suisun Marsh. Largest contiguous estuarine marsh on US west coast - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

Page 1: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

1

Using Integrative Passive Samplers to Monitor Current-Use and Legacy

Pesticides in San Francisco Bay, CA

Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila

USGS California Water Science CenterSacramento, CA

April 24, 2007

Page 2: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

2

Suisun Marsh

• Largest contiguous estuarine marsh on US west coast

• Major, but often ignored, component of the SF Estuary

• Covers 116,000 acres, including managed wetlands, upland grasses, tidal wetlands, channels and sloughs

• Intensely altered and managed for more than 100 years, mostly as a non-tidal freshwater wetland for waterfowl

Page 3: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

3

Importance of Suisun Marsh

• Recognized as valuable tidal brackish environment and important habitat for native fish

• Supports at least 43 plant and animal species of special concern

• Best place left in the estuary to restore large areas of tidal marsh

Page 4: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

4

Page 5: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

Sampled 3 Sloughs with different contaminant inputs Summer 2005 and Winter 2006

Hill Slough

Peytonia Slough

Boynton Slough

5

Page 6: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

• Urban input: EPA 303d list for current-use insecticides• Travis AFB - legacy organochlorine pesticides and current-use pesticides• Inactive landfills - legacy organochlorine pesticides

Hill Slough

6

Page 7: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

• Urban input: EPA 303d list for current-use insecticides and likely other pesticides from home use

• Managed wetlands - duck ponds with high DOM

Peytonia Slough

Duck Clubs

7

Page 8: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

• WWTP: likely source of current-use pesticides from home use

Boynton Slough

WWTP

8

Page 9: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

9

Why Passive Samplers?

• Integrate over time

• Interested in a wide range of pesticides (log Kow = 1.5-7)

– Combined SPMDs and POCIS to cover the range of Kow

• Monitoring legacy organochlorines and pyrethroids

Page 10: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

10

Polar organic chemical integrative sampler (POCIS)

used to monitor hydrophilic contaminants in water

• Easy to extract and analyze

• Contaminants with log Kow <4

• Integrates over time

Page 11: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

11

SPMD/POCIS deployment/retrieval

Page 12: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

12

POCIS Extraction/Analysis• Rinsed HLB sorbent

into glass columns with MeOH

• Extracted w/ 1:1:8 MeOH:EtOAc:DCM

• Filtered particulates using GF/F.

• Removed matrix with carbon SPE cartridges

• Analyzed by GC/MS for ~ 50 pesticides

Page 13: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

13

Pesticide Concentrations in POCIS Samplers (ng/gPOCIS)

1

10

100

1000

10000

Boynton

SloughHill

SloughPeytonia Slough

BoyntonSlough

Hill Slough

CP

OC

IS (

ng

/g)

SIMAZINE

METOLACHLOR

TRIFLURALIN

PENDIMETHALIN

FIPRONIL

Summer Winter

Page 14: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

14

POCIS Field Validation

• Collected water samples at beginning and end of each deployment

• Current-use pesticides detected in both water samples at a site (pendimethalin, simazine)

• Other pesticides were only detected in one of the samples at a site (hexazinone, oxyfluorfen)

Page 15: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

15

TRIF

LURALI

N

SIMAZI

NE

METO

LACHLO

R

PENDIMETH

ALIN

FIPRO

NIL

0

1

1

0

PO

CIS

Wa

ter

Frequency of Detection

Page 16: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

16

Comparison of Water Analysis with POCIS

• If detected in water, results of POCIS agreed well (pendimethalin, simazine, trifluralin)

• Some pesticides detected at low concentrations in POCIS but at or below detection limit in water (metolachlor)

• Transient compounds do not show up in POCIS (hexazinone)

• Good indicator of water concentration over time • Eliminates the need to catch definitive pesticide ‘pulses’• Does not over estimate

Page 17: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

17

PROBLEMS ??

Biofouling and sediment build-up may hinder uptake in environments with high-suspended sediment loads

Page 18: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

18

Semi-permeable membrane devices (SPMDs)

used to monitor hydrophobic contaminants in water

• Samples only dissolved form

• Contaminants with log Kow >4

• Integrates over time

Page 19: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

19

SPMD Extraction/Analysis• Dialyzed 24 hrs in hexane

(EST)• Matrix/lipid removed by GPC

(98:2 DCM:MeOH)• Clean-up/fractionation

– 5 g Florisil (5% deactivated)– 5 g activated silica gel– Collected 2 fractions

• Analyzed by GC/MS (25 current-use) and GC/ECD (26 legacy OCs)

Page 20: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

20

0.2

0.6

1.0

1.4

1.8

-C

hlor

dane

Die

ldrin

4,4

DD

E

4,4

DD

D

4,4

DD

T

Re

lati

ve

Ab

un

dan

ce

C

hlor

dane

Boynton SloughHill SloughPeytonia Slough

0.2

0.6

1.0

1.4

1.8

Summer

Winter

Page 21: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

21

0

1

10

100

1000

10000

Boynton Slough

HillSlough

PeytoniaSlough

Boynton Slough

Hill Slough

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n (

ng

/SP

MD

) TRIFLURALIN

PCA

PCNB

CHLORPYRIFOS

PENDIMETHALIN

BIFENTHRIN

PERMETHRIN

Summer Winter

Current-use Pesticides in SPMDs

Page 22: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

22

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Boynton Slough

Hill Slough

PeytoniaSlough

BoyntonSlough

Hill Slough

Nu

mb

er

of

de

tec

tsCurrent-useLegacy OCs

Summer Winter

• Constant source of legacy OCs to the estuary year around

• Occurrence of current-use pesticides dependent on use and run-off

• Greater number of detects in the winter compared to the summer

Page 23: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

23

POCIS

SPMD

decreasing solubility –increasing

hydrophobicity

Metolachlor

Fipronil

Simazine

Trifluralin

Pendimethalin

PCA

Chlorpyrifos

PCNB

Dieldrin

Bifenthrin

Chlordanes

4,4 DDD

Permethrin

4,4 DDE

4,4 DDT

Page 24: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

24

• Of interest due to increasing use and high toxicity to fish

• Should work since log Kow > 4

• But size and shape hinder their passing through the SPMD membrane

• Also more difficult to remove pyrethroids from SPMDs, resulting in high background of extracted samples

Pyrethroids in SPMDs

O

Cl

O

FF

F

ClO

O

O

Cl

O

O

NH

Cl

F

F

F

O N

Page 25: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

25

Using Passive Samplers for Pesticides

• Useful to combine POCIS (more polar/hydrophilic) with SPMDs (more hydrophobic/less water soluble)

• Good indicator for concentrations below typical MDLs

• Integrate over time – eliminate complexity due to episodic pulses

• ALWAYS TEST – potential problems with pyrethroids

Page 26: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

26

Future Directions

• Laboratory uptake studies to validate effectiveness of passive samplers for current-use pesticides

• Specifically focus on pyrethroids and uptake/extraction from SPMDs

• Future deployments of samplers in other areas where dissolved pesticides are of concern

Page 27: Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, CA

27

Acknowledgments

• Funded by USGS Priority Ecosystem Science Study

• James Orlando (USGS Sacramento, CA)• Cynthia Brown, Ed Moon and Francis Parcheso

(USGS, Menlo Park, CA)• Carl Orazio, David Alvarez, and Walter Crannor

(USGS, Columbia, MO)• Environmental Sampling Technologies (EST)