Kazakhstan Renewable Energy Financing Facility (KazREFF ... · Kazakhstan Renewable Energy...

Kazakhstan Renewable Energy Financing Facility (KazREFF) - Strategic Environmental Review

Appendix A – Receptor ‘value’, ‘vulnerability’ and ‘sensitivity’

Appendix A: Receptor ‘value’, ‘vulnerability’ and ‘sensitivity’

This SER has used expert judgement to determine the sensitivity of receptors based on the value of each receptor against the vulnerability of that receptor to changes resulting from each renewable energy scenario (Table A1 –A7). The value, vulnerability and sensitivity of receptors are defined as follows:

Value: the value of a receptor (either high or low) is based on the scale of geographic reference, rarity, importance for biodiversity, social or economic reasons, and level of legal protection;

Vulnerability: the vulnerability of a receptor (either high, medium, low or none) is based on likelihood of a receptor being exposed to an environmental effect from the KazREFF programme, and the receptor’s tolerance and resilience to a given environmental effect;

Sensitivity: the sensitivity of a receptor is determined as being either high, medium, low or none, based on the combination of the receptor value and vulnerability, as identified below matrix.

Value

High – receptor is rare, important for social or economic reasons, legally protected, of international or national designation

Low – receptor is common, of local or regional designation

Vu

lner

abil

ity

High e.g. potential pathways exist for environmental change in receptors as a result of KazREFF, receptor is in a declining condition, dependent on a narrow range of environmental conditions

High Medium

Medium e.g. few pathways exist for environmental change in receptors as a result of KazREFF, receptor is only expected to recover from disturbance over a prolonged period of time, if at all

Medium Medium

Low e.g. limited or no pathways exist for environmental change in receptors as a result of KazREFF, receptor is in stable or favourable condition &/ or dependent on wide range of environmental conditions

Medium Low

None e.g. no pathways exist between environmental changes and receptors, receptor is insensitive to disturbance

None

None

1. Climate and Air quality

The value, vulnerability, and sensitivity of the environmental receptors for this topic are shown in Table A-1.

Table A-1: Sensitivity of receptors for Climate and Air quality Receptor Wind Solar PV Small Hydro Biogas

Type Value Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity

Climate High –

Climate is an global issue

None –

Installation of wind turbine will not affect the climate

None None –

Installation of solar PV will not affect the climate

None None –

Installation of SSH will not affect the climate

None None –

Installation of biogas facility will not affect the climate

None

Air quality High –

Air quality is national priority which could be a trans boundary issue

Low –

Limited impact is expected during the construction.

Medium Low –

There is limited impact during the construction.

Medium Low –


Medium Low –


Medium

Odour Low –

Odour is an issue with a limited area.

None –

Wind power does not generate odours; therefore, there is no pathway.

None None –

Solar power does not generate odours; therefore, there is no pathway.

None None –

SSH power does not generate odours; therefore, there is no pathway.

None None –

Biogas can only occur on capped landfill, which reduces odours. Emissions are used to generate electricity and decrease emissions

None

2. Surface Water and Groundwater


Table A-2: Sensitivity of receptors for Surface Water and Groundwater

Receptor Wind Solar PV Small Hydro Biogas

type Value Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity

Surface water resource

High –

Availability of surface water resources is of national importance, especially given water scarcity issues forecast for Kazakhstan.

May also be a trans-boundary issue in some locations.

None –

Wind farm development will not utilize water resources; therefore, there is no pathway for environmental change.

None None -

Solar PV plant development will not utilize water resources; therefore, there is no pathway for environmental change.

None

Medium -

There is a potential to change surface water resources due to changes and usage of water as a power source in SSH systems.

Medium None –

Biogas plant development will not utilize water resources; therefore, there is no pathway for environmental change.

None

Surface water quality

High –

Quality of surface water resources is of national importance, especially given water scarcity issues forecast for Kazakhstan.

High -

Construction works, such as installation of turbine foundations and access roads, may cause erosion, surface run-off and sedimentation of surface waters if placed in close proximity to surface water resources.

High High -

Construction works, such as installation of solar panel and access roads, may cause erosion, surface run-off and sedimentation of surface waters if placed in close proximity to surface water resources.

High High -

Construction works may cause erosion, surface run-off and sedimentation of surface waters.

Potential operational impact upon water quality due to disruption of flow, sediment dynamics, etc.

High High -

Construction works, such as installation of solar panel and access roads, may cause erosion, surface run-off and sedimentation of surface waters if placed in close proximity to surface water resources.

High

3. Geology and soils


Table A-3: Sensitivity of receptors for Geology and Soils

Receptors Wind Solar PV Small Hydro Biogas


Bedrock Geology Low –

Geology common to localities or region

Low –

Pathways limited to construction blasting, drilling and foundations

Low None –

No likely potential pathway - construction of facilities are unlikely to require construction at depths that would affect bedrock geology

None Low –

Pathways limited to dam construction blasting, drilling and foundations

Low None –

No likely potential pathway - construction of facilities are unlikely to require construction at depths that would affect bedrock geology

None

Various receptors in Mudflow Hazard Areas

(only in mudflow prone areas)

High –

Mudflow hazards mostly in mountainous regions, adjacent to steep river banks, and along southern border mostly detrimental to environment, public health & welfare

None

Mudflow prone areas are a siting constraint and facilities will not be sited in these areas. Therefore, there are no pathways.

None None

Mudflow prone areas are a siting constraint and facilities will not be sited in these areas. Therefore, there are no pathways.

None Medium –

Project construction activities, land clearing, vegetation removal, inundation along rivers in mudflow prone areas could increase chances for inducing mudflows in higher risk areas.

Medium None –

Mudflow prone areas are a siting constraint and faculties will not be sited in these areas. Therefore, there are no pathways.

None

High Value Soils

(only where geographically present)

High –

Primarily in Northern Kazakhstan, chernozems and other high value soils critical to agricultural productivity and economy

Medium –

Facility footprint and construction activities can result in loss of use for agricultural purposes.

Medium Medium –

Facility footprint and construction activities can result in loss of use for agricultural purposes.

Medium Medium –

Small run-of-river project footprint limits pathways but impoundment can impact broader area. Construction activities, land clearing, removal of vegetation, alteration of drainage can increase erosion / loss of receptor

Medium None –

Most, if not all, biogas projects would be on previously degraded lands.

None

General Soil Characteristics

Low –

General soils of all classifications are common and local

Medium -

Removal of vegetation, erosion, potential release of chemicals, and compaction under heavy equipment and facilities can effect changes to soil characteristics.

Medium Medium -


Medium Medium -


Medium Medium -


Medium

4. Landscape and Biodiversity


Table A-4: Sensitivity of receptors for Landscape and Biodiversity



Protected areas High –

Protected areas are internationally, nationally and regionally important areas of natural habitat, supporting rare, endangered species.

High -

There could be permanent loss of the large land areas occupied by the wind turbine development if sited in or near these areas. Receptors are dependent on narrow range of conditions.

High High -

There could be permanent loss of the large land areas occupied by the solar PV development if sited in or near these areas. Receptors are dependent on narrow range of conditions.

High

Medium –

There would be limited area of footprint occupied by small hydro. Receptors are dependent on narrow range of conditions.

Medium None –

Candidate landfills for biogas facilities are not likely to be present in or near protected areas; however, transmission lines could impact these areas

None

Bird and bat species (migratory species)

High –

Migratory species in Kazakhstan are internationally, nationally and regionally important.

High -

There could be loss of population of migratory bird due to strike associated with turbine and additional above ground transmission line. Receptors are dependent on narrow range of conditions.

High High -

There could be loss of population of migratory bird due to additional above ground transmission line. Receptors are dependent on narrow range of conditions.

High High -


High High -


High

Important terrestrial species

High –

Vulnerable or endangered species such as those species cited under the IUCN red list and Kazakhstan red list.

High –

There could be loss of habitat of important terrestrial species by the wind turbine and transmission line development, particularly during construction. Receptors are in decline and dependent on narrow range of conditions.

High High –

There could be loss of habitat of important terrestrial species by the solar PV and transmission line development, particularly during construction. Receptors are in decline and dependent on narrow range of conditions.

High High–

There could be loss of habitat of important terrestrial species by the SSH and transmission line development, particularly during construction. Receptors are in decline and dependent on narrow range of conditions.

High Medium –

Candidate landfills for biogas facilities are not likely to provide useful habitat and would not support important terrestrial species. However, transmission lines could impact these species

Medium



Important Aquatic species

High –

Vulnerable or endangered species such as those species cited under the IUCN red list and Kazakhstan red list.

High –

Aquatic species could be affected by stormwater runoff, particularly during construction if sited close to water supporting important aquatic species

High High –

Aquatic species could be affected by stormwater runoff, particularly during construction if sited close to water supporting important aquatic species.

High High -

Change in water environment by withdrawal or discharge can have local and regional scale impact on affected water bodies and have potential to disrupt protected fish species if sited close to water supporting important aquatic species.

High None

None

Forest Areas High –

Forest areas are limited in Kazakhstan

High –

There could be permanent loss of the large land areas occupied by the wind turbine and transmission line development if sited in or near these areas.

High High –

There could be permanent loss of the large land areas occupied by the solar PV and transmission line development if sited in or near these areas.

High Medium –

There would be limited area of footprint occupied by small hydro; however, transmission lines could impact forested areas

Medium Medium –

Candidate landfills for biogas facility are not likely to have forest areas; however, transmission lines could impact these species

Medium

Unprotected natural ecosystems

Low-

Network of general natural ecosystem

Low–

There could be permanent loss of the large land areas occupied by the wind turbine development; however, the receptor is stable and common.

Low Low–

There could be permanent loss of the large land areas occupied by the solar PV development; however, the receptor is stable and common.

Low Low–

There would be limited area of footprint occupied by small hydro and the receptor is stable and common.

Low None–

Biogas facilities are not likely to be present in or near valued natural ecosystems – no pathway..

None

High quality landscape

High –

Protected and forested areas are an important resources for visual amenity and unique landscapes character

High –

The presence of wind turbine could directly affect the value of landscape of protected area, their setting and people experience of these landscapes.

High High –

The presence of Solar PV could directly affect the value of landscape of protected area, their setting and people experience of these landscapes.

High Medium –

Small Hydro facility may have local scale landscape impact.

Medium None–

Biogas facilities would be located on existing landfills, which already have a degraded visual character..

None

5. Community and Socio-economics


Table A-5: Sensitivity of receptors for Community and Socio-economics



Housing and Livelihood

High –

Housing and livelihood are important and sensitive community issues.

High –

If facility or transmission lines are sited in high density areas, could require resettlement or loss of livelihood.

High High –


High High –


High Low – Possible resettlement for transmission lines.

Medium

Health High –

human health is a National importance

High –

possible noise and dust during construction and noise and vibration during operation.

Possible injury during construction and installation of transmission lines.

High Medium –

possible noise and dust disturbances during construction.


Medium Medium –



Medium Low –


Positive impact to air quality by replacing fossil fuel and capping open landfill.


Medium

Local employment/income

Low –

Unemployment rate is generally low and similar jobs are comment

Medium –

Few pathways for increasing employment after construction.

Medium Medium–


Medium Medium –


Medium Medium –


Medium

Economy High –

balanced development of major sectors is critical for stable development

Medium –

improvement in energy security.

Permanent loss of

Medium Medium –


Permanent loss of

Medium Medium –


Water availability and quality for industry, mining and agriculture

Medium Medium –


Possibility of loss of land

Medium


Type Value Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity productive land (agriculture, grazing and mineral etc.) due to installation of equipment.

productive land (agriculture, grazing and mineral etc.) due to installation of equipment.

may be affected during construction and operation.

nutrients from the soil by using biogas for power generation.

Tourism Low – contribution of tourism to national economy is underdeveloped.

Low –

Transmission lines might detract from the scenery but very limited pathways for change.

Low Low –


Low Low –


Water impoundments may create additional recreation opportunities

Low Low –


Low

6. Cultural Heritage


Table A-6: Sensitivity of receptors for Cultural Heritage



UNESCO World Heritage Sites and sites on the UNESCO Tentative List

High - High -

If project is sited on or near receptor.

High High -


High High -


High High -


High

Registered cultural heritage sites.

High - High -


High High -


High High -


High High -


High

Unregistered or unknown cultural heritage sites

High to Low - High –


High to Medium

High –


High to Medium

High –


High to Medium

High –


High to Medium

Intangible cultural heritage

High to Low - Low –

Possibility to cause change is unlikely, however impact should be evaluated locally.

Medium to Low

Low –


Medium to Low

Low –


Medium to Low

Low –


Medium to Low

7. Material assets


Table A-7: Sensitivity of receptors for Material assets



Infrastructure High –

Infrastructure is critical for stable development

Medium –

Temporary impact to traffic during construction. Need to construct new transmission lines to connect with grid.

Possible impact to the existing infrastructure due to equipment installation.

Possible improvement in energy access and stability.

Medium Medium –

Temporary impact to traffic during construction. Need to construct new transmission lines to connect with grid.

Possible impact to the existing infrastructure due to equipment installation.


Medium Medium –

Temporary impact to traffic during construction.

Need to construct new transmission lines to connect with grid.


Medium Medium –

Temporary impact to traffic during construction.

Possible impact to the existing facility due to equipment installation.

Need to construct new transmission lines to connect with grid.


Medium


Appendix B – Kazakhstan Species Distribution Maps

Figure B-1: Kazakhstan Species Distribution map for Red List Mammals, excluding bats (Table 1/2)

Altai argali (Ovis ammon ammon) Tian shan argali (Ovis ammon karelini) Karatau argali (Ovis ammov nigrimontana)

Urial (Ovis orientalis) Bukhara red deer (Cervus elaphus bactrianus) Asiatic wild dog (Cuon alpinus)

Caracal (Lynx caracal) Otter (Lutra lutra seistanica) Honey badger (Mellivora capensis)

Figure B-1 : Kazakhstan Species Distribution map for Red List Mammals, excluding bats (Table 2/2)

Russian desman (Desmana moschata) Central asian wild ass (Equus hemionus) Menzbier marmot (Marmota menzbieri)

Goitered Gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa) Siberian Musk Deer (Moschus moschiferus) Snow Leopard (Panthera uncia)

Caspian Seal (Pusa caspica) Mongolian Saiga (Saiga tatarica) European Marbled Polecat (Vormela peregusna)

Figure B-2 : Kazakhstan Species Distribution map for Red List Reptiles

Desert monitor (Varanus griseus)

Figure B-3 : Kazakhstan Species Distribution map for Red List Ampihbians

Asiatic frog (Rana asiatica)

Figure B-4 : Kazakhstan Species Distribution map for Red List Fishes (Table 1/2)

Volga shad (Alosa kessleri volgensis) Pike asp (Aspiolucius esocinus) Aral barbel (Barbus brachycephalus brachephalus)

Turkestan barbel (Barbus capito conocephalus) Ili marinka (Schizothorax argentatus pseudaksaiensis) Balkhash perch (Perca schrenki)

Caspian lamprey (Caspiomyzon wagneri) Inconnu (bukhtarma-zaysan population) (Stenodus leucichtys

nelma) Taimen trout (Hucho taimen)

Figure B-4 : Kazakhstan Species Distribution map for Red List Fishes (Table 2/2)

Aral trout (Salmo trutta aralensis) Caspian trout (Salmo trutta caspius)


Appendix C –List of Cultural Heritage of Kazakhstan Under National Government Program

Table C-1: List of Cultural Heritage of Kazakhstan under National Government Program

№№ Name of Monument Monument Type Monument Location

Astana

1 Building for production workshops of the Kazakh musical-drama theatre named after Kuanyshbayev (former Muslim school), 19th century.

urban development and architecture

ul. Otyrar, 31

2 Congress Hall (former Palace of the Virgin Soil Developers). The Architects O. N. Krauskaya, D. K. Danneberg. 1963, reconstruction in 2000-2001.


ul. Beibitshilik, 1

Almaty

3 The main building of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Architect A. Shchusev. 1948-1953, 1980.


ul. Shevchenko, 28

4 National Library of the Republic of Kazakhstan (the former State Library named after A.S. Pushkin). Architects V.P. Ischenko, B. H. Kim, K. Kalpoj, V. Tyutin, E. K. Kuznetsova, 1970


Prospect Abaya, 14

5 Almaty State University building (the former men's Vernenskaya Gymnasium). Architect P. Gurde. 1892-1895.


ul. Kazybek-bi, 28

6 The Palace Of The Republic. Architects N. I. N, Kim, P. Uhobotov, N. G. Ratushny, Kukushkin, B. H. Parts. 1970


Prospect Dostyk, 54, Abay square

7 The building of the Academy of arts. T. Zhurgenov (former home of the Government of the Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic). Architect M. J. Ginzburg. 1927-1931.


ul. Bogenbai Batyr, 136-а


8 Literary-Memorial Museum of M. Auezov. Architect G. Gerasimov. 1961.


ul. Tulebaev, 185

9 City ambulance station (the former home of architects Zenkov). The architect is unknown. The end of the 19th century.


ul. Kazybek-bi, 115

10 Building of Kazakh-British Technical University (former home of the Government of the Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic). Architects B. R. Rubanenko, T. A. Simonov. 1947-1957.


ul. Tole-bi, 59, Astana Square

11 State residence No. 4 building (former home of T. A. Golovizin, honorary citizen of the Verny city). 1905-1908.


ul. Furmanova, 162

12 The former home of the merchant M. A. Gavrilov. Architect A.P. Zenkov. The beginning of XX century.


ul. Zheltoksan, 167

13 House of fabrics "Kyzyl-Tan" (a former merchant's Gabduvaliev House). Architect A.P. Zenkov. 1912.


ul. Zhibek zholy, 39

14 The building of the Museum of national musical instruments named after Ykylas (former Army Officers Assembly House). Architect A.P. Zenkov. 1908.


ul. Zenkova, 24

15 United States Consulate building in the Republic of Kazakhstan (the former home of Shahvorostov, a merchant). Architect A.P. Zenkov. 1890.


ul. Furmanov, 99

16 Sports complex "Medeu". Architects V. Z. Katzev, A. S. Anarkulov, engineer S. B. Matveyev. 1969-1972.


Natural landmark Medeu


17 The building of the State Museum of arts named after A. Kasteev. Architects E. K. Kuznetsova, O. Naumov, B. M. Novikov. 1976.


ul. Satpaeva, 30-а

18 The building of the National Centre for culture (formerly the boarding house of the Verny city gymnasium). Architect p. Gurde supported by A.P. Zenkov. 1907.


Prospect Dostyk, 15

19 Voznesensky Cathedral. The architects: A. Borisoglebsky, Troparevskij with N. Stepanova, and A.P. Zenkov. 1904-1906.


28 Panfilovtsev Memorial Park

20 The building of the Kazakh State academic theatre of Opera and Ballet named after Abay. Architects A. N. Simpletons, N. A. Orazymbetov. 1939-1941гг.


ul. Kabanbaj batyr, 112

21 The building of the Ministry of culture and information of the Republic of Kazakhstan (former municipal primary real college named after A. Kolpakovsky). Architect A.P. Zenkov. 1890г.


ul. Gogolya, 37

22 Bust of D. A. Kunaev, a three times Hero of Socialist Labor, a prominent statesman and public figure, First Secretary of the Kazakhstan Communist Party since 1964 to 1991. Sculptors T. S. Dosmagambetov, A. B. Tatarinov. 1978.


ul. Bogenbaj batyr, at the crossing with ul. Kunayeva

23 Bust of Lugansky, twice hero of the Soviet Union. Sculptor b. Pavlov, architect M.V. Belotserkovsky. 1947.


ul. Abylai khan, between ul. Gogolya and ul. Aiteke-bi


24 The Memorial Of Glory. Sculptors A. Artimovich, V. Andrushchenko, architects T.K. Basenov and R.A. Seidalin. 1975.


28 Panfilovtsev Memorial Park, along ul. Zenkov

25 Monument to Abai (Ibrahim) Kunanbayev. Sculptor Kh. I. Nauryzbaev, architect I. Belotserkovsky. 1961


Prospect Dostyk, Abay square

26 Monument to M. Auezov. The sculptor E. A. Yesken, architects O. Bajmurzaev, S. Anarkulov. 1980


Prospect Abaya in front of the drama theatre named after Auezov

27 Monument to Chokan Valihanov. Sculptor Kh. I. Nauryzbaev, architect Sh. E. Valikhanov. 1969


ul. Shevchenko at the square opposite the Kazakhstan Academy of Sciences

28 Monument to A. Zhangildin. Sculptors T. S. Dosmagambetov, O. G. Prokopyeva, architect Sh. Valikhanov. 1975


Alamty-1 Rail station square

29 Monument to A. Imanov. Sculptor Kh. Askar-Saryja, architect T.K Basenov. 1947


Prospect Abylay khan, Amangeldy public garden near ul. Mamtova

30 Residence of the First President of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Beginning of 90-ies of the XX century.


ul. Furmanova, 205

Akmolinsk oblast

31 The building of the Museum of the history of Kokshetau (the former House-Museum of V.V. Kuibyshev). 1889-1905


Kokshetau, ul. Dzerzhinsky, 29

32 Monument to Ch. Valikhanov. Sculptor T. S. Dosmagambetov, architect K. A. Abdikov. 1971


Kokshetau, ul. Auezova at the crossing with ul. Kuibisheva

33 Grave of folk composer Birzhan Kozhagulov (1832-1897). Sculptor T. S. Dosmagambetov. 1950


Stepnyak, ul. Lenina, suburbs of the town near the old cemetery

34 The Mausoleum of Botagaj (Bogataj). XI-XII centuries.


Koragalzhinsky district, Koragalzhin settlement, 2 km to the east from the settlement

Aktyubinsk oblast


35 House of culture for the railwaymen (cinema). 1928.


Aktobe, ul. Sh. Ualikhanova, 39

36 Bust of V. Patsaeva, Aviator-Cosmonaut, and hero of the Soviet Union. Sculptors Yu. A. Tour, A. A. Zavarzin. 1976.


Aktobe, sports complex, Prospect Abulkhaira

37 Monument to A. Moldagulov, Hero of the Soviet Union. Sculptor E. N. Shtamm, architect L. V. Rasputov. 1960.


Aktobe, public garden named after Moldagulova, ul. Terniyaza

38 The necropolis of Daumshar XVII-XX centuries. (mausoleum, end of 19th and early 20th century; mausoleum, 2-nd half of the 19th century; saganatam with kulpytas (No. 25); mausoleum (No. 81), 19th century; mausoleum with kulpytas (No. 86), mid-19th century; mausoleum of Murza Murun, 1880)

ensemble Baiganin district, Zharkamys settlement, 37 km south-west from the settlement, left bank of the Emba River

39 The necropolis of Karakesek XVII-XX centuries. (kulpytas and sarcophagus with a kojtas, 19th century; kulpytas (No. 7), early 20th century; fence with kulpytas (No. 10), the end of the 19th century; kulpytas (No. 15), the end of 19th and early 20th century; fence with kulpytas (# 18), 1881; saganatam (No. 68), 1914; saganatam (No. 83), the end of the 19th century; saganatam with kulpytas (No. 111), the 2-nd half of the 19th century; saganatam with kulpytas (No. 115), 1899; sandyktas with kulpytas (No. 131), the 2-nd half of the 19th century; mausoleum (No. 146), the 2-nd half of the 19th century; the mausoleum (No. 147), 1861; fence with kulpytasom (No. 330), beginning of XX century; fence with kulpytas (No. 450), 1844; mausoleum with kulpytas (No. 451), 1845)

ensemble Baiganin district, Zharkamys settlement, 60 km south-west from the settlement


40 Mausoleum of Sundeta built by Dauletnyaz, Master. 1st half of the 19th century.


Baiganin district, Ojamuiut settlement, 30 km north-north-west from the settlement, left bank of the Emba River

41 The necropolis of Asan- Khodzha (Khozha) of the 17th-20th centuries. (saganatam (No. 1), beg. of the 20th century; saganatam (No. 2), beg. of the 20th century; saganatam (No. 3), beg. of the 20th century; saganatam (No. 3), 18th-20th centuries; mausoleum (No. 171), the 17th-20th centuries)

ensemble Baiganin district, Ojamuiut settlement, 50 km north-north-west from the settlement, Emba River valley

42 Mausoleum of Tokban, the 19th century.


Shalkar district, Zhanakonis settlement, 35 km to the north-east from the settlement

43 Abat-Baytak necropolis: mausoleum, kulpytases. XIV-XX centuries.


Khobdinskiy district, Taldisay settlement, 12 km south from the settlement

Almaty oblast

44 Kapchagai hydroelectric complex. Engineer N.V.Vologdin, architect E.V. Earhart. 1965-1971.


Kapchagai city; at the Ili River banks

45 Grave of Sara Tastanbekova, akyn (1878-1916). 1972


Aksu district, Koshkental settlement, 8 кm north-west from the settlement

46 Bust of N. Aldabergenov, twice Hero of Socialist Labour. Architect K. Nauryzbaev. 1960.


Eskaldinskiy district, Aldabergenov village, The Heroes Alley near the Palace of Culture

47 Petroglyphs within the archaeological landscape Tamgaly. The bronze age, and the middle ages

archaeology Zhambyl district, Karabastau settlement, 4 km north-west from the settlement, 40 km north-west from the Kopa rail station, Tamagly mountain region in the Anyrakhai Mountains, south-eastern part of the Chu-Ily mountains separating the watersheds of the Lake Balkash and the Chu River


48 The complex of the House-Museum of Zhambyl 1938-1946. (House of Zhambyl, occupied by Zh. Zhabayev in 1936-1938 and by his the youngest son in 1945-1978. —lived Zhambyla Tezekbaj (museum depository), 1935; literary memorial House-Museum by the architects V. V.Biryukov, and A.K. Deyev, 1938, 1995 - Annex; Zhambyl mausoleum (1846-1945), architect I.I. Belotserkovsky, 1957, 1978 — reconstruction; administrative building, 60s; park)


Zhambyl district, Zhambyl settlement, within the settlement area

49 Besshatyr burial mounds. VII-IV centuries BC.

archaeology Kerbulakskiy district, Basshi settlement, 65 кm north from the settlement on the right bank of the Ili River near the entrance to the Shilbyr ravine

50 Ch. Valikhanov Memorial Park, 1985 (Tomb of Ch. Valikhanov (1835-1865), 1865, 1881 — setting the headstone; monument to Ch. Valihanov; sculptors Yu. Rukavishnikov, N. Milovidov, 1979, Valikhanov Museum «Altyn Emel»; architects B. Ibrayev, A. Rustembek, R. Sejdalin. 1985)


Kerbulakskiy district, Shokan settlement, 3 кm west from the settlement, western edge of the settlement

51 Architectural and art museum complex "Mosque of Zharkent" (a mosque; the Madrasah; main gate; the gate side (South, North) of the 19th century.)


Panfilov district, Zharkent, ul. Yuldasheva, 40

52 Memorial of the Cherkasy defence 1918-1919. (Museum, 1974; Cherkasy Defence Memorial. sculptor V. Yu. Rakhmanov, architects A. Ordabayev, T. B. Suleimenov, 1973; dwelling house -headquarters (1918-1919)


Sarkandskiy district, Cherkasskoye settlement, 2.5 km north from the settlement, in the centre of settlement


53 Talgar Settlement. VIII-XIV centuries.

archaeology Talgar district, Talgar, at the southern suburb of the town on the right bank of the River Talgar and next to the ravine entrance

Atyrau oblast

54 Residential settlement of the oil workers, 1945-1947. Architects A. V. Arefiev, S. V. Vasilkovsky. 1943-1948.

ensemble Atyrau, Area of the residential settlement of the oil workers

55 Mausoleum of Zhuban. Masters Ungalbaj, Munalbaj, Umerbaj, Itbaj, Imanbaj Karažusupov. 1880-1898.


Zhyliojskiy district, Kulsary, 90 km north from the town

56 The burial place of Makhambet Utemissov (1803-1846), poet, the leader of the uprising in 1836-1838; mausoleum was built 1995.


Inderskiy district, Indeborsky settlement, 40 km south from the settlement

57 City of Salem. XIII-XVI centuries.

archaeology Makhambetskiy district, Saraichik settlement, 1.5 km east from the settlement

Eastern Kazakhstan oblast

58 The building of the regional drama theatre. Zhambyl (former People's House). 1902.


Ust-Kamenpgorsk, ul. Golovkova, 31

59 Kredsocbank building (formerly the first public Gogol library; later Abay library; JSC "Bank Centercredit" from 1997). The end of the 19th century.


Semey, ul. Abaya, 68

60 Yamyshevsky fort gates, 18th century (1776)


Semey, ul. Abaya

61 The building of the regional historical Museum (former home of the Governor). 1856.


Semey, ul. Abay, 90


62 Building of the Literary-Memorial Museum-House of. M. Dostoyevsky (the former home of postman Lipuhina, the writer F. M. Dostoevsky lived there in1857-1859). 1838.


Semey, ul. Dostoyevskogo, 118

63 The Memorial to the heroes of the revolution and the civil war. Sculptors A. V. Tikhomirov, O.S Klyushkin, A M. Semchenko, architect M. I. Mikhailov, 1977.


Semey, ul. Mamai batur

64 Double-minaret mosque. Architect Bolbatov, engineer Lieutenant Manashev. 1856-1862.


Semey, ul. Abaya, 50

65 One-minaret mosque. Master Gabulla Efendi. Second half of the 19th century.


Semey, ul. Zhumabayeva, 17

66 Monument to the Hero of the Soviet Union T. Tohtarov. Sculptor P. V. Shishov, architects S. Rapoport, A. E. Martirosov. 1970.


Ridder, ul. Tokhtarova

67 The House where the writer M. Auezov was born. Second half of the 19th century.


Abayskiy district, Borly setttlement, in the settlement area north east from Kaskabulak settlement

68 Complex of Abay Kunanbayev estate 1894-1904. (House, House-Museum of Abay, Tomb of Abay)


Abayskiy district, Borly setttlement, 23-25 km south from the settlement in the Zhidebay ravine

69 Kozy-Korpesh – Bayan-Sulu masar, IX-X century.


Ayaguzskiy district, Tarlauly settlement, 7 km southwest from the settlement on the right bank of the Ayaguz River, 11 km west from the Tansy rail station

70 Shilikty burial ground (57) VII-V centuries BC.

archaeology Zaisanskiy district, Shilikty settlement, 3 km southeast and 5 km northeast from the settlement

71 Mausoleum Of Zejnully. Master and builder Bayazit held. 1925.


Zaisanskiy district, Zholshi settlement, 0,5 km northeast from the settlement

72 Ruins of the Ablaket temple. 1654 г.

archaeology Ulanskiy district, Bozanbay settlement, 15 km southeast from the settlement


Zhambyl oblast

73 Taraz town. I-XIX centuries A.C.

archaeology Taraz, Central town market

74 Bridge over the River Talas. XIII century A.C.


Taraz, south-eastern edge of the city, where the ul. Samarkandskaya and ul. Zhangildina are coming to the River Talas, and near the Tekturmas complex

75 Cali Zhunus Bath. Beg. of the 20th century.


Taraz, ul. Baizak Batyr, 38, at the intersection with ul. Kazybek-bi

76 Mausoleum of Kara Khan. XI century.


Taraz city, in the Centre of the city, at the intersection of ul. Tole-bi and ul. Baizak Batyr

77 Tekturmas Mausoleum. X-XIV centuries.


Taraz, south-eastern edge of the city, the right bank of the River Talas, atop Tekturmas Mount

78 The Mausoleum of Shamansur (Davutbek). XIII century.


Taraz city, in the central part of the city, Karahan st, 1

79 Mosque-Madrasah of Abdukadyra, the beginning of XX century.


Taraz. ul. Abay., 5 at the intersection with ul. Koshenej

80 Zhunusbay mosque (Aulie-Ata), 1913.


Taraz, ul. Adambaeva, 24, at the intersection with ul. Kylymbaj-akyn

81 Nametay mosque. 1887, 1897.


Taraz, ul. Tashkent, 21, at the intersection with ul. Baizak Batyr

82 Statue of Zhambyl Zhabayev. Sculptor Kh. Nauryzbaev, architect V. Sashenko. 1961 г.


Taraz, Zhambyl square

83 Mound Nizhniy Bariskhan (Tortkol). VI-XII centuries.

archaeology Bayzak district, Talas, 1.5 km southeast of the village, on the right bank of the river Talas, 0.5 km north of Taraz-Almaty road

84 Tujmekent Settlement. VI-XII centuries.

archaeology Bayzak district, village of Tujmekent, South-eastern edge of the village, on the right bank of the river Talas Bazakskiy District, Tuimekent village, southeastern adge of the village on the right bank of River Talas


85 The Settlement Ohhum. VI-XII centuries.

archaeology Bayzak district, Shakhan, 13 km northeast of the village, 3 km to the west of the road Sambet-Bostandyk

86 Mausoleum of Aisha-Bibi. XI-XII centuries.


Zhambyl district, village of Aisha Bibi, in the centre of the village, 20 km west of Taraz

87 Babaji Khatun Mausoleum. X-XI centuries.


Zhambyl district, village of Aisha Bibi, in the centre of the village, 20 km west of Taraz

88 Architectural-archaeological complex of Akyrtas. VIII-XII centuries.

ensemble Zhambyl district, Aksholak rail station, 6 km south of the station, at the foots of the Kyrgyz Alatau range, 40 km East from the city of Taraz

89 Zhalpaktobe (Zhikil) settlement. VI-XII centuries.

archaeology Zhambyl district, Zhalpaktobe settlement

90 Burial mound Berkkara (500). 2nd century BC - 4th century AD.

archaeology Jualy, Karabastau village, 3 km south of the village

91 City of Merke. VII-XIII centuries.

archaeology Merki, merke village, Western suburb village

92 The monument to the twice Hero of the Socialist Labor Zh. Kuanishev. Sculptor B. Tulekov, architect T.K. Basenov. 1962.


Moiynkum district, Birlik, in front of the akimat building

93 Shokai Datka Mausoleum. XVIII century.


Sarysu district, village Saudakent, on the eastern outskirts of the village, on the old cemetery

94 Akkol Shell temporary settlement

archaeology Talas district, Akkol, 13 km west of the village, 8 km north of the Lake Akkol

95 Borikazgan Shell-ashel temporary settlement

archaeology Talas district, Kyzylaut, 8 km South-East of the village, 38 km North-East of Karatau

96 Tenirkazgan Shell-ashel temporary settlement

archaeology Talas district, Kyzylaut, 10 km South-East of the village, 34 kilometres north-east of karatau, 13-15 km east of r. Koktal


97 Karakozha Mosque. Beg. of the 20th century.


Talas district, village of Sejilbek, the eastern edge of the village

98 Abdullah Ishanah Mosque. Beg. Of the 20th century.

archaeology Talasskiy District, Usharal village, ul. Eshtaibeka, 7

99 Kulan settlement. VI - beginning of the 13th century.

archaeology Turar Ryskulov area, Kulan, Eastern and North-eastern edge of the village

100 Aktobe settlement. VI—XIII centuries.

archaeology Shui district, Aksu, 3 kilometres south-east of the village, on both banks of the river Aksu

Western Kazakhstan oblast

101 The building of the regional historical Museum (formerly the Russian-Kirghiz school). 1864.


Uralsk, Prospect Dostyk-Druzhba, 184

102 City-building complex, part of the old city of Uralsk from the city centre to ul. Pugachyov XVII-XX centuries: (building of the regional Akimat (formerly Commerce Bank), 1896; building of the clinics of the Department of Internal Affairs (the former home of nakaznyh atamans), 1823, building of the regional Philharmonic, ul. Kurmangaliyev (former home of Karev), 1901; building of the Gaidar library (former army utility Board), 1869; the Cathedral of Michael the Archangel, 1740-1751; the building of the Military Prosecutor's Office (the former model urban Homestead). 1878; Cathedral of Christ the Saviour, architect V. N. Chagin, 1891-1907)

ensemble Uralsk, Prospect Dostyk-Druzhba, 184; Prospect Dostyk-Druzhba, 179; ul. N. Savicheva, 43; ul. Kareva, 47; Prospect Dostyk-Druzhba, Prospect 166; Prospect Dostyk-Druzhba, 63; city district "Kureni"; Prospect Dostyk-Druzhba, 147; Prospect Dostyk-Druzhba, 202


103 The Chapayev museum complex; 1919. (25th Chapayev Division headqiaters (museum), 1919; place of V. I. Chapaev death, 1919; mass grave of Chapayev Division soldiers, 1957)


Akzhikskiy District, Chapayevo village, Culture and Recreation Park, monuments alley

104 Dwelling house (Urdinskaya Publishing House from 1918, later dwelling house). Second half of the 19th century.


Bokeyordinskiy District, Orda village, ul. Abdully Tenizbayeva, 19

105 Bust of the Hero of the Soviet Union M. Mametova. Sculptors Yu.P. Pommer, N.A. Kovalchuk. 1971 г.


Zhanibekskiy District, Zhanibek village, ul. Utemisova, 26

Karaganda Oblast

106 Monument to the Hero of the Soviet Union N. Abdirov, Sculptors A.P. Bilyk, Yu.V. Grummel, architect L.E. Vorobiov. 1958 г.


Karaganda, Prospect N. Abdirova

107 Begazy burial. XII-X centuries BC

archaeology Aktogay district, Begazy village, 1 km west of the village on the right bank of the Begazy river, 18 km above its confluence with the river Tokyrau, 40 km South-East from Aktogai village

108 Group burials Aidarly. Late bronze age-early iron age

archaeology Zhanaarka district, Ajshyrak, 2 km west of the village, on the right bank of the Atasu river, in the Valley of Aksay

109 Cemetery of Sangru (Sanguyr) (II) (150). Bronze age-early iron age

archaeology Zhanaarka district, Ajshyrak, 5.5 km west of the village, 4 km northwest of Darat homesteading, Sanguyr natural landmark in the upper reaches of Atasu river.

110 Ajshyrak burial ground (102). Bronze age

archaeology Zhanaarka district, Aktau village, 20 km north of the village, on the left bank of the Atasu river, 93 km to the southeast of the Karazhal mine


111 Cemetery of Sangru (Sanguyr) 1 (40). The era of the late bronze age

archaeology Zhanaarka district, Aktau village, 45 km to the East of the village, in the Sanguyr natural landmark, 3 km North-East of the Darat natural landmark

112 Mausoleum of Juban-Ana. XI-XII centuries.


Zhanaarka district, Monadyr rail station, 12 km to the Northwest of the station, on the right bank of the Sarysu river

113 Tomb of the folk composer Madi Bapiuly (1880-1921)


Karkaraly district, Karkaralinsk, 0.2 km north of the city, the Akbejt cemetery

114 The ruins of the Kzylkent Palace. XIV-XV centuries.

archaeology Karkaraly district, Kent village, 3 km east of the village on the river Kzylsu, a tributary of r. Taldy in the Kent mountains, 40 km South-East from Karkaralinsk

115 The Mausoleum of Ajranbay (Beskumbez). 19th century.


Ulytau district, Algabas village, 35 km south of the village, on the right bank of the Sarysengir river

116 Mausoleum of Ayakhamyr. XI-XII centuries


Ulytau district, Zhezdy village, 9 km northwest of the village on the left bank of the Zhezdy river

117 Alasha-Khan mausoleum. XI-XII centuries.


Ulytau district, Melshibay village, 2 km southwest of the village on the right bank of the Karakengir river

118 Zhoshi-Khan (Jochi-Khan) mausoleum, 1st half of XIII century.


Ulytau district, Melshibay village, 28 km south-east of the village, on the left bank of the Kengir River, 50 km northeast of Zhezkazgan

119 The Mausoleum Of Duzena (Zhuzden). Master: Emanuly Seraly. 1863-1866.


Ulytau district, Melshibay village, 30 km to the north-west of the village, on the right bank of the Karakengir river

120 The ritual structure of Dombaul. VIII-IX cent.


Ulytau district, Melshibay village, 24 km south-east of the village, on the right bank of the Kengir River, 55 km northeast of Zhezkazgan

121 Labak Mausoleum. 19th century.


Ulytau district, Melshibay village, 20 kilometres south-east of the village, on the left bank of the Karakengir


river

122 Ketebay Mausoleum. 1898 г. urban development and architecture

Ulytau district, Melshibay village, 20 kilometres south-east of the village, on the left bank of the Karakengir river

123 Bolgan-Ana mausoleum. The 12th and 13th centuries.


Ulytau district, Talap village, 30 km South-East of the village

124 Ancient settlement Baskamyr IX-XII centuries.

archaeology Ulytau district, Taldysay, 0.5 km South-East of the village, 18 km north of Zhezdy settlement, on the left bank of the Zhezdy river at the mouth of the Taldysay river

125 Makat mausoleum 1923 urban development and architecture

Ulytau district, Shenber village, 8 km northwest of the village

126 Burial ground Taldy, 1 (48). XIV-XI centuries B.C.

archaeology Shetskiy district, Zhanazhurt village, 10 km North-East of the village, on the left bank of the Taldy river

127 Burial Buguly II (Kusmurun) (57). Late Bronze-early iron age

archaeology Shetkiy district, Zharyk rail station, 40 km North-East of the station, on the Bank of the Shop river, off the North-East, at the foot of Mount Buguly

Kostanay Oblast

128 Bust of the twice Hero of the Soviet Union P.I Beda. Sculptor D.P Shwartz. 1951


Kostanaj, ul. Pushkina, 98

129 Bust of the twice Hero of the Soviet Union I.A. Pavlov. Sculptor D.P Shwartz. 1952


Kostanaj, ul. Pushkina, 98

130 Monument to I. Altynsarinu The sculptor N. Shcherbakov, architects I. A. Pokrovsky, D. D. Gorchinskij. 1970.


г. Kostanaj, ul. Altynsarina, 118-a, near the Museum of Altynsarin.

131 Residential house in which A. Imanov was proclaimed leader of the 1916 uprising. Master Ajmagambet-mouth. The beginning of XX century.


Amangeldi district, Amangeldy village, ul. Mailina, 16


132 The ritualistic structure of Ekidyn. VII-IX centuries.


Within the Arkalyk City Akimat area, Ekidyn village, 1.5 km North-East of the village, on the right bank of the Karaturgaj river

133 The ritualistic structure of Ekidyn II. VII—IX centuries.


Within the Arkalyk City Akimat area, Ekidyn village, 0.5 km North-East of the village, on the left bank of the Karaturgaj river

Kysylorda oblast

134 Bust I. Zhakhayev, the twice Hero of the Socialist Labour. Sculptor A. Pekarev. Architects A. Boretskiy and K. Kulbasheva. 1975


Kyzylorda, ul. Ibraya Zhahaeva, near school No. 4. Named after S. Seifullin

135 The Mosque of Ajtbay. Masters Iskhan and Kamal. 1878.


Kyzylorda, ul. Satpayeva, 18

136 Church of Christ The Savior XIX century.


Kyzylorda, ul. Isy Toktybayeva,5

137 Urban settlement Zhent (Zhankala) V—XVII centuries.

archaeology Zhalagashskiy district, village of Akkyr, 30 km south of the village, on the right bank of the Zhanadar river, 2 km from the main channel

138 The Mausoleum Mulkalan (Mulla-Kalan). XVI century.


Zhalagashskiy district, Zhanadarya village, 3 km to the South-East of the village

139 Mausoleum of Kara-Zopa. XVIII-XIX centuries.


Zhanakorgan region, Zhanakorgan village, 5 km South-East of the village

140 Mausoleum of Ajkozhi. XVIII-XIX centuries.


Zhanakorgan region, Besaryk rail station, 6 km south of the station

141 Aktas mosque. 1884. urban development and architecture

Zhanakorgan region, Besaryk rail station, 6 km south of the station

142 Urban settlement Sagynak (Sunakata). VI—XIX centuries.

archaeology Zhanakorgan district, Sunakata village, 2 km northwest of the village

143 Begin-An tower. XI century. urban development and architecture

Kazalinskiy district, Kazaklinsk, 10 km east of the city


144 Complex of city buildings is a historic part of the city of Kazalinsk, end of XIX-beginning of XX century (House of Ganibaya, 19th century; the building of the Memorial Museum of G. Muratbaev (former building of Soviet Department), end of XIX - beginning of XX centuries; the building of the city library (the former Ganibaya mosque), 19th century; Nogai mosque (mosque Nuraly), 19th century)


Kazalinskiy district, Kazalinsk, in the courtyard of the school № 7, ul. Korkyta-ata, 24; ul. Chaliapina, 17; ul. Zhanuzakova, 51

145 Building of the district House of Culture named after R. Baglanova (former Church). 1904.


Kazalinskiy district, Kazaklinsk, ul. Aiteke-bi, 1

146 Saraman-Kosa (Sharman-Hodge) Tower. XI century.


Kazalinskiy district, Kaukej village, 2 km North-East of the village

147 Mausoleum of Kuttybay. The 17th-20th centuries.


Kazalinskiy district, Urkendeu village, 5 km from the village

148 Ancient settlement Zhankent (Yangikent). V-XV centuries.

archaeology Kazalinskiy district, Urkendeu village, 0.5 km South-East of the village, on the left bank of the Syrdarya River

149 Mausoleum of Balanda 2. VI-II cent. BC.


Karmakchinskij district, village of Kuandarya, 15 kilometres south-west of the village

150 Mausoleum of Syrly-tam on Zhanadarya. XII — XIII centuries.


Karmakchinskij district, Tagai, 16 km north-east of the village

151 Urban settlement Zhetiasar 3 (Altynasar). I century B.C. — beginning of VIII century.

archaeology Karmakchinskij district, village of Turmagambet, 12 km northwest of the village, in the Zhetyasar natural landmark, by the dry bed of the Kuandarya River

152 Kutebar tower. XIX cent. urban development and architecture

Sirdarya region, Akzharma village, 10 km west of the village, at grave-yard of the abandoned village Shirkejli.

153 Sarly-tam mausoleum on Inkadarya. XIII cent.


Sirdarya region, Inkardaya village, 25 km south of the village

154 Asan-ata mausoleum. XVI cent.


Chiiliyskiy district, rail station Bajgekum, 5 km east of the station

Mangistau oblast


155 The necropolis of old Beineu XI-XIX centuries. (Beket-ata underground mosque; mausoleums (2); sagana (24) kulpytas; sagana (9); kulpytas (26), kojtas (15) koshkartas (1); koitas, kulpytas (14); fence, kulpytas (8); (2) pyramid; the sarcophagus, kulpytas (5); sarcophagus (7); wall (6); Stella (5); fence, stela (5)

ensemble Beyneu district, rail station Beineu, 17 km South-West of the station

156 Omar and Tur mausoleum. 1898


Beyneu district, rail station Beineu, 20 km to the East of the station

157 Beket-ata underground mosque in the Oglandy area. XVIII century


Karakiya district, Senek village, 95 km North-East of the village

158 The necropolis of Kyzylsu, XVIII-XX centuries. ((1) mosque, mausoleum (1); sagana (54); kulpytas (3); koitas (11); koitas, kulpytas (1); kulpytas, koitas, sarcophagus (1); pyramid (26); sarcophagus (4); fence (9); stela (2)


Karakiya district, Senek village, 21 km North-East of the village

159 The necropolis of Senek XVII-XX centuries. (the mausoleum (3); Sagan (30); pyramid (1)

ensemble Karakiya district, Senek village, 1 km south of the village

160 Shopan-ata necropolis X-XIX centuries. (underground mosque (1); (6) Sagan (209) kulpytas, Sagan (7); kulpytas (65); koitas (680) koitas, kulpytas (149), kulpytas, koitas, sarcophagus (5); kulpytas, pyramid (50) fence, kulpytas (52); pyramid (54); sarcophagus, kulpytas (21); sarcophagus (59); fence (210); stone mound (50); stela (58); fence, stela (24)

ensemble Karakiya district, Senek village, 12 km North-East of the village

161 The necropolis of Kyrgyn of the 19th-20th centuries. (mausoleum (1) Sagan (3) kulpytas (1); koitas (15) pyramid (6).

ensemble Karakiya district, Old Zhetybai village, 5 km west of the village


162 Sisem-ata necropolis XIII — XIX centuries (mausoleum (24); sagana (138); kulpytas, sagana (17); kulpytas (81); koitas (159); koshkartas (1); kulpytas, koitas (148); kulpytas, koitas, sarcophagus (20); kulpytas, pyramid (22) fence, kulpytas (79); pyramid (3); sarcophagus, kulpytas (17); sarcophagus (129); fence (133); stone mound (70); stela (236)

ensemble Mangystau district, rail station Sai-Utes, 35 km North of the station, 2.5 km east of the western escarpment of the Ustyurt Plateau

163 The necropolis of Ouali XI-XX centuries. (mosque (1); (1) sagana (6); kulpytas, sagana (2); kulpytas (16), (18); koitas, kulpytas (7); kulpytas, pyramid (2); fence, kulpytas (27); pyramid (12); sarcophagus, kulpytas (2); sarcophagus (4); fence (92); stone mound (44); stela (52); fence, stela (42)

ensemble Mangystau district, rail station Sai-Utes, 60 km North-East of the station, 5 km northwest of passing siding №6

164 The necropolis of Karamola (Shytsha, Tobekuduk), XII-XV centuries. (mausoleum (1); sagana (1); koitas (107); sarcophagus (5); fence (13) stonemound (7)

ensemble Mangystau district, p. Tauchik village, 20 km north of the village

165 Underground mosque and necropolis of Shakpak-ata IX-X and XIV-XIX centuries.


Mangystau district, Tauchik village, 45 km North-East of the village, 6 km south of Sarytas area, Shilikuduk mount area

166 Masat-ata necropolis X-XIX centuries. (mosque (1); (5) Sagan (28); kulpytas, sagana (3), kulpytas (18) koitas (309); koshkartas (1); kulpytas, koitas (48); kulpytas, pyramid (8); fence, kulpytas (5); the sarcophagus, kulpytas (6); sarcophagus (25); fence (42); stone mound (7); stela (16); fence, stela (4)

ensemble Mangystau district, Ushtagan villager, 20 km South-East of the village

167 Kapasha Mosque. Master: Kapash Kinakumy. 1928.

ensemble Mangystau district, Shetpe village, 35 km north of the village

168 Mangystau district, p., 35 km north of Shetpe village

ensemble Mangystau district, Shetpe village 17 км east of the village


169 The necropolis of Beki XVIII — XIX centuries (mausoleum (3); sagana (13); kulpytas (7); koitas (35); koitas, kulpytas (6); kulpytas, koitas, sarcophagus (2); kulpytas, pyramid (5); fence, kulpytas (5); pyramid (5); sarcophagus, kulpytas (2); sarcophagus (4); fence (8); stone mound (7); stela (9); fence, stela (6)

ensemble Mangystau district, Shetpe village, 25 km to the South of the village

170 Kara-Tobe necropolis of XVIII-XX centuries (sagana (20); kulpytas (40); koitas (22); koitas, kulpytas (63); kulpytas, koitas, sarcophagus (1); kulpytas, pyramid (3); fence, kulpytas (3); sarcophagus, kulpytas (4); sarcophagus (3); fence (39); stone mound (8); stela (19)

ensemble Mangistau district, Tuschykuduk village, 30 km east of the village

171 Karaman-ata necropolis XIII — XIX centuries. (underground mosque; (3) sagana (41); kulpytas, sagana (2); kulpytas (17); koitas (132); koitas, kulpytas (52); kulpytas, koitas, sarcophagus (5); kulpytas, pyramid (7); fence, kulpytas (6); pyramid (10); sarcophagus, kulpytas (1); sarcophagus (33); fencing (55); stone mound (40); stela (38); fence, stela (30)

ensemble Mangystau district, Shetpe village, 40 km North-East of the village

172 The necropolis of Kamysbaj XV-XIX centuries. (mausoleum (12); sagana (54); kulpytas (10); koitas (99); koitas, kulpytas (83); kulpytas, koitas, sarcophagus (3); fence, kulpytas (11); pyramid (40); sarcophagus, kulpytas (1); sarcophagus (10); fence (51); stone mound (11); stela (33); fence, stela (12)

ensemble Mangystau district, Shetpe village, 14 km east of the village

173 Dwelling house. Master Idris Serkebayev. 1940.


Tupkaragan district, Fort-Shevchenko, ul. M. Abdyhalykova, 58


174 The necropolis of Bisembay XVII-XIX centuries (mausoleum (2); sagana (16); koitas (21); koitas, kulpytas (13); kulpytas, fence (2); pyramid (1); sarcophagus (1); fence (17); stone mound (5); stela (5)


Tupkaragan district, Fort-Shevchenko, 25 km east of the city

175 Memorial of Taras Shevchenko (1847-1857). 1932 (dugout of Shevchenko; House Museum, 1853; well; the bust of Taras Shevchenko, 1888)


Tupkaragan district, Fort-Shevchenko, Park named after T. G. Shevchenko, ul. B. Mayauly, 7

Pavlodar oblast

176 The building of the regional historical Museum (formerly the Trade House of Merchant Derov). 1899.


Pavlodar, ul. Lenina, 149

177 Tomb of the folk composer Yestai (1874-1946). 1946.


Aktogay district, Mutkenova village, 4 km south of the village

178 Tomb of the folk composer Zhayau Musa (1835-1929). 1929.


Bayanaul district, village of Zhanatlek, 30 km to the South-West of the village, in the desert

North Kazakhstan oblast

179 House of Ablai (military infirmary, barracks). 1829.


Petropavlovsk, ul Teatralnaya, 16

180 The building of the regional Finance Department (the former home of the merchant Yangurazov, school from 1988; from 2005 - the Office of the spiritual Association of Muslims of Kazakhstan). The beginning of XX century


Petropavlovsk, ul Ulyanova, 94

181 The building of the Museum of fine arts (former home of the merchant Yuzefovich). 1909.


Petropavlovsk, ul. 314 Strelkovoj Divisiy, 83

182 Monument to Karasay and Agyntay batyrs. 1999.


Petropavlovsk, Theatre square

183 Memorial to Karasay and Agyntay batyrs. 1999.


Aiyrtau district, karasay village, 4 km South-East of the village

184 Settlement Botai. XXIV-XXII century BC

archaeology Aiyrtau district, village of Nikolskoye, 1.5 km southeast of the village, on the right bank of the Iman-Burlyk river

185 Syrymbet Manor (Manor Of Valihanov). 19th century.

urban development and Aiyrtau district, Syrymbet village, 3 km to the South-East of the


architecture village

South Kazakhstan oblast

186 Mausoleum of Khoja Ahmed Yasawi. The end of the 14th century.


Turkestan, South-Eastern part of the city, in the settlement of Turkestan

187 Urban settlement of Kultobe, mid 1st cent. - XIV cent.

archaeology Turkestan, 350 m south of the mausoleum of Khoja Ahmed Yasawi

188 Urban settlement of Turkestan XV—XIX cent.

archaeology Turkestan city, in the South-East of the modern city

189 Large Hilvet. XII cent. urban development and architecture

Turkestan city, 150 m south of Ahmed Yasavi hanaka in Turkestan, necropolis

190 Hilvet of Aulye Kumchik-ata. XII cent.


Turkestan, 1 km south of Ahmed Yasavi hanaka

191 Chillyahana (shidehana). XIV cent.


Turkestan city, 22 m Northwest of Ahmed Yasavi hanaka in Turkestan, necropolis

192 The octahedral mausoleum XIV-XVI centuries.


Turkestan, 40 m to the South of East minaret Ahmed Yasavi hanaka

193 The Mausoleum of Sultan Begim. XV cent.


Turkestan city, 60 m South-West of Ahmed Yasavi hanaka in the Turkestan medieval necropolis

194 Nameless mausoleum (crypt) XVI.


Turkestan city, 45 metres south-west of Ahmed Yasavi hanaka in Turkestan, necropolis

195 Wall of the fortified Citadel. XVI-XIX centuries.


Turkestan city, eastern part of the Citadel fortifications, Turkestan urban settlement

196 Eastern bath. XVI-XVIII centuries.


Turkestan city, 150 m to the South-South-West of Ahmed Yasavi hanaka

197 Mausoleum of Esim Khan. XVII cent.


Turkestan city, 12 m south of Ahmed Yasavi hanaka minaret in the West, on the site of the medieval necropolis of Turkestan

198 Gate of the Citadel. XVIII-XIX centuries.


Turkestan, eastern side of the Citadel fortifications, Turkestan

199 Juma Mosque. 19th century. urban development and architecture

Turkestan, 150 m south of Ahmed Yasavi hanaka, next to Large Hilvet

200 Complex of railway station, 1903 (station; Home Depot; living; ice stores)


Turkestan rail station


201 Sauran urban settlement XIII—XVIII cent.

archaeology The territory of the Turkestan maslikhat, Sauran village, 9 km northwest of the village, 40 miles northwest of Turkestan

202 Karasu temporary settlement (named after Ch. Valikhanov), Mustye

archaeology Baidibek district, Karasu village, 2 km northwest of the village, on the right bank of the Arystandy river

203 The architectural complex Appak Ishanah XIX (mosque, madrasa, darshana)


Baidibek district, Shayan village, the western edge of the village

204 The architectural complex of Ismail-ata, XI-XIX centuries. (mausoleum of Ismail-ata, middle ages; Zhabraila mausoleum, XIX century: Koshkar-ata mausoleum, middle ages; mosque, the later Middle Ages; chillyahana, the middle ages, the gates 19th century.)


Kazygurt district, Turbat village, in the Centre of the village on the territory of the necropolis, on the north side

205 Arystanbab Mausoleum. The beginning of XX century.


Otyrar district, Kogam village, 3 km North-North-West of the village

206 Urban settlement Okyz (Oksus) I—XIV cent.

archaeology Otyrar district, Mayakum village, 8 km north of the village in the Akzhar natural landmark, on the left bank of the Syrdarya River

207 Otrar settlement I-XVIII centuries

archaeology Otyrar district, Talapty village, on the south-eastern outskirts of the village

208 Sairam (Isfidzhab) settlement VIII-XVII centuries

archaeology Sairam district, Sairam village, in the village, in the floodplain on the right bank of the River Sayramsu

209 Abdel Azizbaba Mausoleum. Mid XIX century.


Sairam district, Sairam village, the northern part of the village, in the centre of the old cemetery

210 Ibrahim Ata Mausoleum. XVII-beginning of XX century


Sairam district, Sairam village, in the north-western outskirts of the village, on a hill near the road to the village Aksu

211 Mausoleum of Khoja Taliga. XIX century.


Sairam district, Sairam village, in the centre of the village, 300 meters east of the intersection of Lenin and


Communisticheskaya streets

212 Mausoleum of Mirali-baba. End of XIX century


Sairam district, Sairam village, in the old cemetery, 250 meters west of the intersection of Lenin and Communisticheskaya streets

213 Mausoleum Karashash analysis. XVIII century.


Sairam district, Sairam village, in the village centre, in the old cemetery, 250 meters west of the intersection of Lenin and Communisticheskaya streets

214 Minaret Hyzr Payghambar. XVIII-XIX centuries.


Sairam district, Sairam village, in the centre of the village, 200 meters southeast of the intersection of Lenin and Communisticheskaya streets

215 Madrassas. End of XIX century.


Suzak district, Baba-Ata village, on the outskirts of the village

216 Mosque-mausoleum Baba-ata the end of XIX century.


Suzak district, Baba-Ata village, on the left bank of the river. Baba-Ata, in the settlement

217 Castle ruins. VI-X centuries. archaeology Suzak district, Baba-Ata, on the left bank of the Baba-Ata river, in the settlement

218 Mosque Nogai-Ishan XIX century.


Suzak district, Suzak, in the village centre

Table C - 2: National List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage

№ Name of an element Category of an element/ ICH domain

1 Nauryz Social practices, rituals and festive events

2 Hunting with birds of prey (eagles, hawks and etc.)

Knowledge and practices concerning nature and the universe

3 Aitys – art of music and poetic improvisation as a contest between akyns

Oral traditions and expressions, including language as a vehicle of the intangible cultural heritage

4 Traditional knowledge and skills of manufacturing Kiyiz Yui/Yurt.

Traditional craftsmanship

5 Kazakh traditional art of performing dombra kuy

Performing arts

6 Art of music performance on Kazakh national stringed instrument Kobyz

Performing arts

7 Kazakh traditional art of singing Performing arts

8 Batyrlan zhyry/ Heroic epics - Cycle of 50 Kazakh heroic epics:


o Alpamys batyr

o Kobylandy batyr

o Yer targyn

o Yer Edige

o Kambar batyr

o Karabek batyr

o Kokshe batyr

o Son of Kokshe Er Kosay

o Son of Aisa Akhmet batyr

o Alau batyr

o Tama batyr

o Karasay-kazy

o Yer Zhanibek

o Ensegei boily er Yessim

o Aidos batyr

o Zhetigen batyr

o Sabalak Abylaikhan

o Olzhash batyr

o Kabylan batyr

o Myrza Satbek batyr

o Orakty batyr

o Bogenbay batyr

o Kissa yer Kabanbay

o Yer Zhassybay

o Zhidebay batyr

o Olzhabay batyr

o Otegen batyr

o Rayimbek batyr


o Zhanibek batyr

o Myrky batyr

o Barak batyr

o Kokzharly Barak batyr

o Bazar batyr

o Berdikozha batyr

o Zhantay batyr

o Syrym batyr

o Yer Azhibay

o Arkalyk batyr

o Yer Kenesary

o Agybay batyr

o Yessenkeldi batyr

o Iman batyr

o Zhankozha batyr

o Sauryk batyr

o Suranshy batyr

o Bayseyit batyr

o Myrzash batyr

o Shayan batyr

o Kozheke batyr

o Beket batyr

9 Kyz Zhibek – Kazakh lyric and epic poem Oral traditions and expressions, including language as a vehicle of the intangible cultural heritage

10 The book of Korkyt Ata – Kazakh epic Oral traditions and expressions, including language as a vehicle of the intangible cultural heritage

11 Kazakh zergerligi – knowledge and skills of Kazakh traditional jewellery making


12 Kokpar – Kazakh national horse-riding sports game


13 Kazakh kuresy – Kazakh national style of wrestling


14 Kiyiz basu – traditional art of manufacturing felt Traditional craftsmanship 15 Besik – traditions of manufacturing and using

Kazakh traditional baby cradle Traditional craftsmanship

16 Kymyz – technologies of manufacturing and meaning of Kumys, Kazakh traditional dairy product made from fermented horse milk


17 Kozy Korpesh – Bayan Sulu - Kazakh lyric and epic poem


18 Zhetigen – technologies of manufacturing traditional polycord stringed musical instrument and art of performing on it

Performing arts

19 Sybyzgy – technologies of manufacturing traditional wind musical instrument and art of performing on it

Performing arts

20 Shankobyz – technologies of manufacturing traditional reed musical instrument and art of playing on it

Performing arts


21 Orteke – Kazakh traditional art of music puppetry

Performing arts

22 Kara Zhorga – folk dance Performing arts

23 Terme – singing and recitative genre of Kazakh folklore


24 Komei – Kazakh traditional art of throat singing and reciting

Performing arts

25 Togyzkumalak/9 stones – Kazakh traditional board game


26 Kazakh traditional art of carpet weaving Traditional craftsmanship

27 Shubat – technologies of manufacturing and meaning of the national dairy product Shubat made of camel milk


28 Kara Olen – genre of lyric singing Oral traditions and expressions, including language as a vehicle of the intangible cultural heritage

29 Baksy Saryny – ritual ceremonial song of Kazakh shamans, followed by dancing


30 Keste – Kazakh embroidery on various materials Traditional craftsmanship

31 Tekement – tradition of manufacturing felt carpet


32 Teri ondeu – traditions and technologies of manufacturing leather products


33 Er-turman – technologies of manufacturing horse harnesses


34 Asyk – national game Knowledge and practices concerning nature and the universe

35 Kazakh national cousine Knowledge and practices concerning nature and the universe

36 Shildekhana – Kazakh ceremonies related to the birth of a child:

Social practices, rituals and festive events

Besik toyi

Kyrkynan shygaru

Tusau kesu

Ashamayga mingizu

37 Betashar – Kazakh wedding ceremonies: Social practices, rituals and festive events

qoshtasu

synsu

betashar

toybastar

zhar-zhar

38 Zhoktau – funeral rites Social practices, rituals and festive


estirtu events

konil aitu

korisu

zhoktau

aryzdasu

39 Sayis – national horse-racing games: Knowledge and practices concerning nature and the universe

Audaryspak

Kyz kuu

Tenge alu

Zhaby atu

Zhorga zharys

40 Sheshendik sozder – oratory skills Oral traditions and expressions, including language as a vehicle of the intangible cultural heritage

41 Kazakh traditional wearing – technologies of manufacturing and meaning:


Saukele

KImeshek

Taqiya

Shapan and etc.

42 Kazakhtyn zhylnamasy – Kazakh calendar of 12-year animal cycle


43 Anecdotes and tales of Kozhanassyr/Hodja Nasreddin


44 “Keroglu” epic Oral traditions and expressions, including language as a vehicle of the intangible cultural heritage

45 Traditional games for children and youngsters – “Bes tas”, “Tympi”, “Sokyr teke”, “Ak suyek”, “Altybakan”, “Akterek pen kok terek and etc.)

обычаи, обряды, празднества

46 Art of manufacturing Kazakh music instrument Dombyra



Appendix D – Compliance of the KazREFF Renewable Energy Scenarios against the SER Objectives

Table D-1: Compliance of the KazREFF Renewable Energy Scenarios against the SER Objectives Key Performance is based on the number or proportion of receptors linked to each SER Objective for which significant effects have been predicted Significant negative performance against SER Objective

or

Significant positive performance against SER Objective

or

Insignificant negative performance against SER Objective

or Insignificant positive performance against SER Objective

or

No Effects Uncertain ?

Environmental Topic

SER Objective: Does the proposed development of the KAZREFF renewable scenario…

Receptors

Wind Small hydro Solar Photovoltaic

Biogas

Climate and air quality

Contribute to reduction of GHG emission

Climate

Reduction of GHG emission can be achieved

through replacement of

fossil fuel related energy by renewable

energy




energy




energy

Capping/covering existing open

landfills can significantly

decrease methane

emissions.




energy

Contribute to improved air quality

Air quality

Improvement of air quality

can be achieved through

replacement of fossil fuel

related energy by renewable










landfills can significantly air

quality.

Improvement of air quality can

Environmental Topic


Receptors

Wind Small hydro Solar

Photovoltaic Biogas

energy

energy

energy

be achieved through



energy.

Design modifications can mitigate

potential emissions of

hazardous air pollutants.

Comply with EU and Kazakh air quality regulations

Air quality

Compliance of air quality regulation can be achieved as practice is established.




Surface water and groundwater

Minimise adverse impacts to surface/ground water quality

Surface Water quality Groundwater quality

Pollution prevention,

erosion control measures, and

siting constraints will avoid adverse

effects on surface and

groundwater quality.
















Minimise adverse impacts to water resource

Surface Water Resource Groundwater



or

Even with successful

implementation of mitigation





Environmental Topic


Receptors


Photovoltaic Biogas

s Resource



groundwater resource.

measures, there will be potential

to change to surface water

resource at impoundment

or between intake and

outflow of run-of-river systems.







Maintain ecologically-viable base flows in waterways

Surface Water Resource Aquatic species

Projects will not impact aquatic

species.

or

Lengths of river at structure or downstream

may be affected by low flows

with effects on fisheries and other uses.


species.


species.

Geology and soils

Minimise loss of use of high quality arable soils and impacts of soil nutrient depletion

High value soil

or

Application of siting

constraints and mitigation measures

should minimize loss of high value soils.

or




or




Candidate development landfills are

already degraded with little to no high

value soils.

Avoid the weakening of soil/streambanks resulting in mudflo

Various receptors in Mudflow Hazard Areas

Siting constraints will avoid placing

facilities in mudflow prone

areas

or



should minimize loss of



areas



areas

Environmental Topic


Receptors


Photovoltaic Biogas

ws high value soils

Landscape and biodiversity

Minimise adverse impacts to wildlife, protected species, and their habitat

Protected areas

Bird and bat

Important terrestrial species

Important Aquatic species

Unprotected natural ecosystems

or



should significantly

minimise impacts to

wildlife, and protected

species, and their habitat.

or




minimise impacts to


species, and their habitat

or




minimise impacts to


species, and their habitat


already degraded with

little to no wildlife and habitat area.

Avoid adverse impacts to designated conservation sites

Protected areas

IBA



should avoid impact on designated

conservation sites.




conservation sites.




conservation sites


already degraded and would not be designated as conservation

sites

Avoid impacts to scenic/aesthetic areas

High quality landscape value

Due to the scenario scale

and the area of land-take it is

not likely to be possible to fully mitigate/offset

for the landscape &

visual effects of

or



should avoid or significantly

minimise impact on landscape &

visually

or

Due to the scenario scale

and the area of land-take it is

not likely to be possible to completely

mitigate/offset for the

landscape &

or


already degraded areas with little to no scenic/aesthetic

value. However,

capping/coveri

Environmental Topic


Receptors


Photovoltaic Biogas

large wind farms.

aesthetic areas visual effects of large solar PV

facilities; however, some visual screening

will minimise these impacts. .

ng existing open landfills can improve the

aesthetics of the area. .

Community and socio-economics.

Minimize the physical displacement of people

Demographics

or



should avoid displacement. However, if

unavoidable, impacts will be minimised by

mitigation measures



should avoid displacement.

or



should avoid displacement. However, if


mitigation measures


already degraded areas and are unlikely

to provide living areas for

people.

Minimise impacts to important areas for hunting, fishing, tourism, and recreation

Tourism or

Application mitigation measures

should avoid impact to the

areas.

There might be positive effect

on environmental

image and ecotourism potential through

improved energy

reliability for economic

or

Careful siting of project could

avoid impact to the areas.


on environmental


improved energy


development.

or

Careful siting of project could

avoid impact to the areas.


on environmental


improved energy


development.

or

Candidate development

landfills are not likely to be

tourist areas or have significant

recreational value.

However, capping/covering existing open

landfills can improve the

tourism potential of the

surrounding areas.


Environmental Topic


Receptors


Photovoltaic Biogas

development. on environmental


improved energy


development.

Minimise impacts to human health from noise, vibrations, odour, lighting, or sanitation

Human Health

or



should avoid impacts from

noise and vibration.

However, if unavoidable,

impacts will be minimised by

mitigation measures.

or








or




reflections. However, if




landfills can decrease odours and improve the sanitation of the

surrounding areas.

Improve employment and standard of living

Employment Economy

Increased local employment opportunities

can be maximised,

mainly during construction but also operation.


can be maximised,



can be maximised,



can be maximised,


Avoid impacts to water supply

Employment Econom


or




Environmental Topic


Receptors


Photovoltaic Biogas

for potable use, fisheries, and irrigation

y constraints and mitigation measures

should avoid impacts to water supply, fisheries and irrigation.






mitigation measures





Material Assets

Avoid impacts to existing infrastructure

Infrastructure

or

New development might require improvements

to existing transportation infrastructure.

Can provide increased

reliability for electricity in remote area.

or

New development would require

improving existing

transportation infrastructure.



or


improving existing




or


improving existing


Avoid impacts resulting from increased vehicular traffic

or

Minor increases in traffic would

be limited to construction

period. Impact will be

minimised through


or




minimised through


or




minimised through


or




minimised through


Environmental Topic


Receptors


Photovoltaic Biogas

Cultural heritage

Avoid impacts to cultural and archaeologically important areas

UNESCO World Heritage Sites and sites on the UNESCO Tentative List

Registered cultural heritage sites.

Unregistered or unknown cultural heritage sites

or

?



should avoid impact on

known sites.

However, it may not be possible to completely some vial

impacts are placed close to

sites.

Chance finds protocols will mitigate impacts at unknown or unregistered sites; however, any effects on these areas would need to be determined at the project level and may not be possible to effectively mitigate.

or

?




known sites.



sites.

Chance finds protocols will

mitigate impacts at unknown or unregistered

sites; however, any effects on

these areas would need to be determined at the project level and may not be possible to effectively

mitigate.

or

?




known sites.



sites.

Chance finds protocols will

mitigate impacts at unknown or unregistered

sites; however, any effects on

these areas would need to be determined at the project level and may not be possible to effectively

mitigate.

Due to location at existing

landfill, effects on intangible

cultural heritage are unlikely.


Appendix E – Gaps between EBRD PR for ESIA and Kazakhstan EIA requirements

Appendix E: Gaps between EBRD PR for ESIA and Kazakhstan EIA requirements

EBRD Performance Requirement/Issue

Issue Related Kazakhstan OVOS Requirement

Gap

PR 1: Environmental and Social Appraisal and Management

All EBRD‐financed projects undergo environmental and social appraisal

The EIA is obligatory for all sectors of economic and other activities that may directly or indirectly impact the environment and public health. The EIA process is performed on the strength of commitment, integration (magnitude), alternative, adequacy, preservation, compatibility, flexibility, and public participation.

None

Categorization and EIA magnitude The EBRD categorizes proposed projects as “A”, “B”, and “C”. A project is classified as Category A when it could result in potentially significant and diverse adverse future environmental and/or social impacts and issues which, at the time of categorization, cannot readily be identified or assessed and which require a formalized and participatory assessment process carried out by independent third party specialists in accordance with the PRs (Appendix 1 to the EBRD ESP). A proposed project is classified as Category B when the potential adverse environmental and / or social impacts that it may give rise to are

Economic activities subjected to the EIA procedure are categorized as I, II, III, and IV, of which categories I and II cause major impacts on the environment. According to the requirements, there is the list of projects (economic activities) for which the EIA is recommended to be performed in full (for example, oil industry and crude oil refineries, thermal power stations, chemical installations, pipelines for transport of gas, oil or chemicals, etc.) and the list of projects (economic activities) for which the requirements to carry out a comprehensive assessment are imposed by State review authorities on the basis of a preliminary review or by applying

None



Gap

typically site‐specific, and/or readily identified and addressed through mitigation measures. These impacts could be from past, current or future activities. Due diligence requirements may vary depending on the project and will be agreed with the EBRD on a case‐by‐case basis, in accordance with PR 1. A proposed project is classified as Category C when it is likely to result in minimal or no adverse environmental or social impacts and therefore requires no further environmental and social appraisal beyond categorization. Based on the KazREFF SER, it is anticipated that most funded projects will fall within Categories B or C.

thresholds defined by regulations (agriculture, forestry, mining industry, power industry, wind farms, etc.).

EIA stages The EIA process comprises the following stages: 1) preliminary EIA (stage 1); 2) EIA that is performed for a complete and comprehensive analysis of potential effects of the project or further economic and other activities, substantiation of alternatives, and development of an environmental management plan (programme) (stage 2); 3) “Environmental Protection” section that constitutes part of the design documentation and contains engineering solutions aimed at prevention of adverse

None



Gap

impacts on the environment (stage 3). The EIA format, completeness of studies, scope of used documents, levels and degree of detail of environmental scientific & design surveys depend on the design stage as well as on magnitude and intensity of impacts caused by projected economic and other activities on human health and environment. EIA is an integral part of pre‐design and design documents.

Preliminary environmental and social assessment (Pre EIA) Through appraisal activities, the client will consider in an integrated manner the potential environmental and social issues and impacts associated with the proposed project. The appraisal process will be based on recent information, including an accurate description and delineation of the client’s business or the project, and social and environmental baseline data at an appropriate level of detail. The appraisal should also identify applicable laws and regulations of the jurisdictions in which the project operates that pertain to environmental and social matters, including those laws implementing host country obligations under international law (for example, commitments

Through Pre‐EIA activities, the potential trends of changes in environmental and socioeconomic components as well as impacts on both the society and environment are identified. No need in computations of the pollution level for certain environmental components (air, soils, water, subsoil resources). Pre‐EIA documents are disclosed for public by a project initiator. Pre‐design appraisal documents (business‐plans, feasibility studies) and main pre‐design documents such as “Investment substantiation” and Pre‐EIA documents are

None



Gap

related to land use planning and protected area management).

submitted to the State Environmental Review (SER). A positive Conclusion issued by the SER in favour of the project initiator, serves as a guide for making decisions to initiate designing of specific facilities and structures in accordance with the most rational option selected in the course of Pre‐EIA development.

Environmental and social appraisal (EIA) mechanism

Environmental and social impacts and issues will be appraised in the context of the project’s area of influence. Environmental and social issues and impacts will also be analysed for the relevant stages of the project cycle. These may include preconstruction, construction, operations, and decommissioning or closure and reinstatement. Where relevant, the appraisal will also consider the role and capacity of third parties, such as local and national governments, contractors and suppliers, to the extent that they may influence the project, recognizing that the client’s ability to address these risks and impacts will depend on its control and influence over the third party actions. The appraisal will also consider potential trans‐boundary and global issues, such as impacts from effluents and emissions, increased use or contamination of international waterways, greenhouse gas emissions, climate change mitigation and adaptation issues, and impacts on endangered species and habitats.

The EIA process comprises an assessment of impacts on:

atmospheric air water resources; subsoil resources; industrial and domestic waste; physical impacts; lands and soils; flora; fauna; socioeconomic environment; environmental risks from planned

activities in the region A project initiator discloses EIA documents for the public.

None



Gap

PR 2: Labour and Working Conditions

At a minimum, the client’s human resources policies, procedures and standards shall be designed to: establish and maintain a sound worker‐management relationship; promote the fair treatment, non‐discrimination and equal opportunity of workers; promote compliance with any collective agreements to which the client is a party, national labour and employment laws, and the fundamental principles and key regulatory standards embodied in the ILO conventions that are central to this relationship; protect and promote the health of workers, especially by promoting safe and healthy working conditions.

Labor relationship in the Republic of Kazakhstan is regulated by the Labor Code and it does not constitute part of the EIA process. Issues related to labor and working conditions and safety are considered in the “Environmental risk assessment in connection with planned activities in the region” section.

Labor relationship issues are not reflected in typical Kazakh EIA documents. This would be a gap if not addressed in a project‐specific ESMP.

PR 3: Pollution Prevention and Abatement

The client will avoid the release of pollutants or, when avoidance is not feasible, minimize or control their release. This applies to the release of pollutants due to routine, non‐routine or accidental circumstances with the potential for local, regional, or trans‐boundary impacts. In addition, the client should examine and incorporate in its operations energy efficiency measures and measures to conserve water and other resources, consistent with the principles of cleaner production. The client will avoid or minimize the generation of hazardous and non‐hazardous waste materials and reduce its harmfulness as far as practicable.

Measures aimed at prevention and abatement of environmental pollution are specified in EIA documents (“Atmospheric Air”, “Water Resources”, and “Waste” sections). These measures provides for introduction of low‐waste and waste‐free technologies and special measures on i) prevention (abatement) of air emissions; ii) adverse impact mitigation; iii) air quality monitoring; iv) amounts and chemical composition of wastewater discharges; v) substantiation of the introduction of water circulating systems and wastewater reuse systems, recycling of sludge from wastewater treatment facilities; vi)

None



Gap

groundwater protection against pollution and depletion; and vii) recommendations related to recycling, treatment and disposal of all types of waste and waste recycling/waste disposal technologies.

PR 4: Community Health & Safety and Security

Requirements relating to: infrastructure and equipment safety; hazardous materials safety; community exposure to disease; emergency preparedness and response; and security personnel requirements. These requirements are focused on avoidance or prevention of risks and impacts rather than their minimization and mitigation.

EIA documents comprise a section titled “Assessment of environmental risks for the environment and community health in connection with planned economic activities”. This section contains i) recommendations on prevention of and response to emergencies; ii) consideration of emergency probability; sources and kinds of emergencies and frequency of their occurrence as well as forecasts of their impacts on the environment and community.

None

PR 5: Land Acquisition, Involuntary Resettlement and Economic Displacement

The following requirements are considered in the course of project design: carrying out of consultations; grievance mechanism; resettlement planning and implementation; Resettlement Action Plan; livelihood restoration framework; compensation and benefits for displaced persons; displacement; physical displacement; economic displacement; and loss of public amenities.

Issues related to land acquisition and involuntary resettlement are regulated by the Land Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. But the Pre‐EIA documents to be submitted to the SER for reviewing should contain a copy of document for the right of land use in the subject territory.

Kazakhstan EIA regulations do not contain requirements related to land acquisition, involuntary resettlement and economic displacement.

PR 6: Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Resource Management

Through the environmental and social appraisal process, the client will identify and characterize the potential impacts on biodiversity likely to be caused by the project. The extent of due diligence should be sufficient to fully characterize the risks

The EIA process also includes an assessment of impacts on vegetation in the project influence area (the presence of medicinal herbs; rare, endemic and Red Data Book‐listed plat species), green space

None



Gap

and impacts, consistent with a precautionary approach and reflecting the concerns of relevant stakeholders. The client will seek to avoid adverse impacts on biodiversity.

condition; forecasted changes of the vegetation cover in the project implementation area and impacts of these changes on life and health of local communities; recommendations for conservation of vegetation communities, improvement of their condition, flora conservation and revegetation; recommendation for vegetation monitoring, etc. Furthermore, the EIA documents contain a baseline assessment of aquatic and terrestrial fauna (the presence of rare, endangered and Red Data Book‐listed fauna species); measure to conserve and reproduce the integrity of natural communities and species diversity of aquatic and terrestrial fauna; food potential improvement; a wildlife monitoring programme. In addition, the presence of natural territories and landmarks under special protection in the territory of potential construction operations is considered.

PR 7: Indigenous Peoples

In projects where Indigenous Peoples are likely to be affected, the client is required to carry out an assessment of impacts on Indigenous Peoples. Depending upon the outcome of this, the client is expected to first avoid adverse effects and where this is not feasible, to prepare and Indigenous

The Kazakhstan legislation does not specify requirements related to Indigenous Peoples

The Kazakhstan EIA procedure does not consider issues related to Indigenous People. However, this is not typically an issue in



Gap

Peoples’ Development Plan so as to minimize and/or mitigate any potential adverse impacts. The client is also expected to implement a specific grievance mechanism and determine appropriate modalities for compensation and benefit‐sharing.

Kazakhstan, where there is no indigenous population.

PR 8: Cultural Heritage

At an early stage of the environmental and social appraisal, the client should identify if any cultural heritage is likely to be adversely affected by the project, and assess the likelihood of any chance finds. The client will ensure that provisions for managing chance finds, defined as physical cultural heritage encountered unexpectedly during project implementation, are in place. Such provisions shall include notification of relevant competent bodies of found objects or sites; alerting project personnel to the possibility of chance finds being discovered; and fencing‐off the area of finds to avoid any further disturbance or destruction.

EIA documents contain a section devoted to territories, landmarks and sites under special protection. Cultural heritage is regulated by the RK Law “On Protection and Use of Historical and Cultural Heritage Sites and Objects” dated July 2, 1992. Companies, institutions, organizations, educational institutions, public organizations and individuals will support an authorized relevant body in implementation of measures aimed at protection, preservation and use of historical and cultural heritage sites.

None

PR 9: Financial Intermediaries (FI)

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable

PR 10: Information Disclosure and Stakeholder Engagement

“Information Disclosure and Stakeholder Engagement” specifies requirements relating to stakeholder identification, development of a Stakeholder Engagement Plan, information disclosure, meaningful consultations, and grievance mechanism.

Public opinion is given proper weight in the process of EIA development. Public opinion consideration format depends on the significance of planned economic activities and the extent of project influence on the environment and community health; much

Kazakhstan requirements do not specify a detailed procedure for stakeholders identification and engagement or the grievance mechanism



Gap

depends on stakeholders. The procedure and dates of public consultations is regulated by environmental supervisory authorities. Public opinion is mainly considered through public consultations. The results of public consultations are recorded in the form of a report where all key issues and disagreements between stakeholders and a client are recorded. Stakeholders’ comments and proposals are considered in design documents. Written proposals and comments from stakeholders (as an independent form of public opinion consideration) are collected for individual less significant projects of economic activities. At subsequent stages of project design, the procedure of public opinion consideration can be carried out through collection of written proposals and comments in respect of EIA findings for a certain industrial operation.

procedure.


Appendix F – Stakeholder Engagement Programme Timeframe

Appendix F: Stakeholder Engagement Programme Timeframe Error! Reference source not found. below describes the key elements of the KazREFF SER stakeholder engagement and consultation programme. Stakeholder consultation has been on-going throughout the main SER. There will be additional scoping meetings and capacity-building training to allow more people to contribute and learn how this SER can be a valuable environmental and social planning tool.

Events/Activities Tasks Information for disclosure

Timeframe

1. Stage 1 – Project Introduction and Stakeholder Identification (April through July 2013)

1.1.Individual consultations with identified key stakeholders

Gathering baseline information; presenting SER process

Initial KazREFF SER flyer (in English and Russian)

April-May 2013

2. Stage 2 – Scoping and Capacity Building (July 2013 through March 2014)

2.1 Posting SEP on the KazREFF website

Presenting the document to public for discussion and comments

SEP (in English and Russian)

June 2013

2.2. Posting draft SER Scoping Report on the KazREFF website


Draft SER Scoping Report (in English and Russian)

June 2013

2.3 SER Scoping Meetings in Astana and Almaty

Gathering feedback on SER Scoping Report from the stakeholders and identification of capacity building needs

Presentation of key topics from the SER Scoping Report (in Russian)

16 and 18 July 2013

2.4. On-going Phone/email/mail correspondence with key stakeholders

Gathering feedback on SER Scoping Report from the stakeholders

Draft SER Scoping Report (in English and Russian)

June 2013 – February 2014

2.5. Scoping and capacity building workshops as needed

Building dialogue capacity for KazREFF and its applicants and local experts; introduction of SER approach

Draft SER Scoping Report; hand-out materials (in Russian)

July 2013 –March 2014

3. Stage 3 – Public Consultation and Implementation (September 2014 through March 2015)

3.1 Notify stakeholders of availability of Draft SER for 120-day public consultation

Email communication with all identified stakeholders

Availability of SER for public consultation.

Revised KazREFF SER Leaflet (from Stage 1)

September 2014

Events/Activities Tasks Information for

disclosure Timeframe

3.2. Posting Draft SER Report on the KazREFF website


Draft SER Report (in English and Russian)

September 2014

3.3. Posting Draft SER Report Non-Technical Summary on the KazREFF website


Non-Technical Summary (in English, Russian, and Kazakh)

September 2014

3.4 SER workshops in Astana, Almaty, and regional centres as necessary

Presentation of key conclusions of the SER (in Russian)

Draft SER Report in English and Russian

SER Non-Technical Summary in English, Russian, and Kazakh

September 2014

3.4.1 Announcement of SER workshops in Astana, Almaty, and regional centres as necessary

Publish meeting, date, and venue announcement in regional newspaper.

SER report meeting announcement

14 days prior to each meeting

3.4.2 Establish SER report repositories in Astana, Almaty, and regional centres as necessary

Place copies of the SER Report in libraries for public review

Draft SER Report in English and Russian

SER Non-Technical Summary in English, Russian, and Kazakh

14 days prior to each meeting

3.5. Implementation round tables/by-invitation workshops in the target regions if level of interest indicates the need for it

Provide stakeholders with key guidance for using the SER, both within EBRD’s KazREFF programme and for other RES developments projects outside of KazREFF.

Renewable Project Environmental Review Report

January 2015.

Specific dates for meetings will be announced through SER and KazREFF public websites, and regional newspapers

3.6. Collecting feedback and comments on Draft SER report

Discussion of the SER results

Draft SER documents On-going process throughout the 120 day consultation period September 2014 through January 2015

3.7. Closing of public comment period

Obtain and process public feedback

Draft SER documents At the end of the 120 day consultation period (January 2015)

Events/Activities Tasks Information for

disclosure Timeframe

3.8. Preparation of Report on Public Consultation

Addressing all comments and feedback

Preparing a summary of the KazREFF SER stakeholder engagement consultation process

Final SER Report in English and Russian

Report on Public Consultation

March 2015

Kazakhstan Renewable Energy Financing Facility (KazREFF ... · Kazakhstan Renewable Energy...

Documents

Transcript of Kazakhstan Renewable Energy Financing Facility (KazREFF ... · Kazakhstan Renewable Energy...