Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University.

16
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University

Transcript of Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University.

Page 1: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University.

STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING

Kayla Jordan

D. Wayne Mitchell

RStats Institute

Missouri State University

Page 2: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University.

What is SEM?

Statistical technique useful for testing theoretical models

Theory-driven Confirmatory

Page 3: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University.

Types of Variables

Latent VariableExogenous Variable

Manifest or Observed Variable Error

Residual

Endogenous

Page 4: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University.

Types of Models

Measurement Model Structural Model

Page 5: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University.

Degrees of Freedom

Knowns: n(n+1)/2 -> 8(9)/2 -> 36 Unknowns: 5 factor loadings, 2 path coefficients, 8

error variances, 2 residuals -> 17 total unknowns Degrees of Freedom: Knowns – Unknowns -> 19

Page 6: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University.

Estimates

Page 7: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University.

Factor LoadingsRegression Weights: (Group number 1 - Default model)

Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label

H1 <--- Harm 1.000

H2 <--- Harm 1.020 .112 9.105 ***

H3 <--- Harm 1.096 .111 9.843 ***

H4 <--- Harm .883 .112 7.900 ***

H5 <--- Harm .692 .153 4.508 ***

H6 <--- Harm .643 .171 3.754 ***

Standardized Regression Weights: (Group number 1 - Default model)

Estimate

H1 <--- Harm .716 H2 <--- Harm .705 H3 <--- Harm .768 H4 <--- Harm .608 H5 <--- Harm .344 H6 <--- Harm .286

Indicates all observed variables are measuring the latent variable.

Values closer to one indicate that the observed variable is measuring latent better (e.g., H3 is a better item than H6)

Page 8: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University.

Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Page 9: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University.

Path Analysis

Page 10: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University.

Full Structural Model

Page 11: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University.

Multi-Trait, Multi-Method

Page 12: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University.

Fit IndicesModel Fit Summary

CMIN

Model NPAR CMIN DF P CMIN/DF Default model 70 1021.692 395 .000 2.587 Saturated model 465 .000 0 Independence model 30 2715.382 435 .000 6.242

Baseline Comparisons

Model NFI

Delta1 RFI

rho1 IFI

Delta2 TLI

rho2 CFI

Default model .624 .586 .730 .697 .725 Saturated model 1.000

1.000

1.000

Independence model .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

RMSEA

Model RMSEA LO 90 HI 90 PCLOSE Default model .089 .082 .096 .000 Independence model .162 .156 .168 .000

Page 13: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University.

Model Comparisons Need for Multiple Models Chi-Square Difference CFI Difference

Page 14: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University.

Assumptions Sample Size Normality Outliers Multicollinearity

Page 15: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University.

Programs

Page 16: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University.

Questions?

Contact: [email protected]