Kay 235: Introduction to Management Lecture 2 Subject: The public & private (business)...
-
date post
21-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
2
Transcript of Kay 235: Introduction to Management Lecture 2 Subject: The public & private (business)...
Kay 235: Introduction to Management
Lecture 2
Subject: The public & private (business) administration difference
Reading: Graham Allison Article
Public and Business Administration: The Links Last week: Links between public and
private (business) administration A generic view of administration
No real difference between PA & BA- Wilson Universal principles of (scientific)
management- Taylor PA is a multidisciplinary field
Includes political science, management & law There are many BA courses in PA programs
Beginning Point for Allison
Wallace Sayre`s often quoted law/hypothesis: Based not on scientific analysis, but
on years of personal observation of governments.
Public and private management are fundamentally alike in all unimportant respects.
Allison`s objective
Answer Sayre`s invitation to research And write an article to examine and
discuss how PA & BA are similar and different.
Central question: In what ways are the jobs &
responsibilities of a public manager similar to and different from those of a private manager?
FRAMING THE ISSUE How is `management` different (broader,
narrower…) from administration? Management: Organization and direction of
resources to achieve a desired result. What is public management?
Minimal government PA borrowing from management strategies Detailed answer:
Laurence Lynn`s article next week
ANATOMY OF PA What?
Activities found in govt. and non-profits
Who? People who at all levels of
government Elected
Presidents, members of the Parliament, mayors…
Appointed Many levels of
bureaucrats like office directors, judges…
Contracted
Definition of PA Daily personnel management Workforce Planning Collective bargaining & labor-
management relations Productivity & performance management Organization/ reorganization Financial management Program and management audit
Similarity: General Functions
How are public and private management alike?
1. A set of general management functions: Famous acronym: POSDCORB
Planning Organizing Staffing Directing Coordinating Reporting Budgeting
Similar lists can be found in the management literature
Similarity: General Functions
A general manager is expected to integrate these general functions to achieve results. In real life situations, significant
differences may emerge More difficult execution in PM
The two sectors are interdependent
Differences
How are public and private management different? Identical labels take on different
meanings in public and private settings
People, who worked in both sectors judge that the two are different and public management is harder.
Difference 1: Time Perspective Public managers have relatively shorter
time horizons dictated by Political necessities Political calendar (e.g. elections)
Private managers have a longer time perspective oriented toward Market developments, Technological innovation and investment, Organization building
Example to Time Horizon Difference
The US President looks forward four years at most The fourth, even the third year is
dominated by the reelection issues and the campaign
President of a company usually looks forward a decade (Ten years)
Difference 2: Duration
The length of service of politically appointed top public managers is relatively short Averaging no more than 18 months
Private managers have a longer tenure
Difference 3: Successors
In private management, a successor and even several possible candidates are trained before leaving the job In public management, fostering a
successor can be perceived even dangerous
Difference 4: Performance Measurement
There is little agreement on the standards and measurement of performance in the public sector This has changed since late 1970s
Public management discussion in Lynn article Various tests of performance is
available in the private sector Financial return Market share Performance measures for executive pay
Difference 5: Personnel Constraints
Legal constraints complicate the hiring, transfer, and layoff of personnel in the public sector Private managers have greater latitude
in hiring, transfer and firing of employees Other important personnel issues:
Can government employees join unions? Can they strike and collectively bargain?
Difference 6: Equity & Efficiency
In public management the main emphasis is on providing equity among different constituencies
Private management places greater stress upon efficiency and competitive performance
Difference 7: Public vs. Private Processes
Public management tends to be exposed more to public scrutiny and claims of open government
Private management tends to be relatively more `private` and its processes are less exposed to public review
Difference 8: Role of Press & the Media
Public management must meet regularly with the press & the media Its decisions are often anticipated by
the press Private sector decisions are reported
less The press has a much smaller impact
on the substance and the timing of the decisions
Example to Press Relations
A CEO of a private firm rarely deals with the press Except for public relations purposes
The US President is routinely on display Continuously dealing with the White
House press, and with the wider circle of reporters, commentators and columnists
Difference 9: Persuasion & Direction
Public managers often seek to mediate decisions in response to various pressures They have to form coalitions of inside
& outside groups to survive By contrast, private managers risk
little contradiction And thus seek less consent
Difference 10: Number of Superiors
Public managers tend to regard themselves as responsive to many superiors This is a constitutional difference
Separation of powers
Private managers look more to one high authority
Difference 11: Legislative & Judicial Impact
Public managers are often subject to close scrutiny by Legislative oversight groups Judicial orders
Such scrutiny is much less common in private management
Difference 12: Bottom Line Public managers rarely have a clear
bottom line Social usefulness and public interest are many
times vague concepts, which are hard to define
The bottom line is very clear for private managers To maximize profits brings legitimacy To increase market performance and survive
Issues that Complicate Things
Blurring of differences between public and private management There are hybrid organizations
Government agencies that seek profits Private firms that seek to promote the
public interests A new category
Public-private partnerships
How to extend the discussion?
The article only provides One comparative example Several quotes from managers, who
worked in both sectors More systematic comparisons are
needed More case study research in PA to
examine similarities and differences with BA