Kate Comtois, PhD, MPH University of Washington Treatment Interventions for Suicide Prevention.

31
Kate Comtois, PhD, MPH University of Washington ent Interventions for Suicide Prev

Transcript of Kate Comtois, PhD, MPH University of Washington Treatment Interventions for Suicide Prevention.

Kate Comtois, PhD, MPHUniversity of Washington

Treatment Interventions for Suicide Prevention

Suicide prevention has many forms

Public health or injury prevention

Gatekeeper Training

Treating Depression

Suicide prevention has many forms

This talk is about preventing suicide with mental health interventions to treat suicide attempts or other suicidal behavior

Overview

• What does the clinical trial research tell us about treatment with suicidal patients?– What doesn’t work?– What does work?

• What can we learn clinically from the research data?

What doesn’t have evidence?Inpatient psychiatric admission

http://www.thecochranelibrary.com Hawton et al, 2009, Deliberate Self Harm

Note, highest risk individuals excluded from trial.

Or type of inpatient psychiatry…

http://www.thecochranelibrary.com Hawton et al, 2009, Deliberate Self Harm

Easy access to inpatient psychiatry has promise, but is not significant.

http://www.thecochranelibrary.com Hawton et al, 2009, Deliberate Self Harm

Anti-depressant medications don’t have evidence either.

http://www.thecochranelibrary.com Hawton et al, 2009, Deliberate Self Harm

What does work?Earlier studies of CBT show promise

http://www.thecochranelibrary.com (Meta-analysis including DBT show significance for CBT)

Cognitive Therapy for suicide prevention (10-16 sessions) plus case management is quite effective in reducing suicide attempts.

Brown, G. K. et al. JAMA 2005;294:563-570

Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) is effective at reducing self harm (with BPD).

http://www.thecochranelibrary.com Hawton et al, 2009, Deliberate Self Harm

Since this review, DBT benefits have been replicated in 8 randomized clinical trials. Two trials non-significant: compared to APA guidelines for BPD and to Transference Focused Therapy

And, believe it or not, an innovative idea from 1976: sending caring letters is effective.

Letters were sent to patients who were not in

treatment 30 days after inpatient discharge.

Hunter Area

Toxicology Service

Dear « FirstName » It has been a while since you were here at the Newcastle Mater Hospital, and we hope things are going well for you. If you wish to drop us a note we would be happy to hear from you. Best wishes, Dr Andrew Dawson Dr Ian Whyte

Newcastle Mater Misericordiae Hospital

Locked Bag 7, Hunter Regional Mail Centre NSW 2310 Phone: 49 211 283 Fax 49 211 870

5 Year Psychiatric Hospital admissions

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Quarter

Cum

ulat

ive

n

Control

Postcard

Sending caring letters was replicated in Australia for deliberate self poisoning.

Random half of the patients discharged after self-poisoning

got these cards.

Results:

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59

Months

Cum

ulat

ive

num

ber

of r

eadm

issi

ons

Control

Postcard

5 year medical admissions for self-poisoning

Carter GL et al 2005 BMJ;331:805; Carter GL et al 2007 Br J Psychiatry;191:548-53.Carter GL Oct 2008 Presentation at HMC

Recently letters did not replicate in psychiatric emergency room setting when controlling self-harm

Beautrais et al 2010 Br J Psychiatry 197, 55–60

Caring letters receiving further study with study pending in Army personnel and revising a grant from Harborview to NIMH.

VA has implemented caring letters now.

Jobes, 2006

Standard clinical interactions, including suicide interventions, are clinician as expert interviewing patient about depression.

????????

????

THERAPISTTHERAPIST

PATIENTPATIENT

KRAEPELINIAN REDUCTIONISTIC MODELREDUCTIONISTIC MODEL

DEPRESSIONDEPRESSIONLACK OF SLEEPLACK OF SLEEP

POOR APPETITEPOOR APPETITE

ANHEDONIA ...ANHEDONIA ...

? SUICIDALITY ?? SUICIDALITY ?

(1) Treating suicide directly (not just bytreating the diagnosis)

Effective psychotherapies for suicidal individuals have (at least) 2 differences.

(2) Using an overtly collaborative stance rather than psychiatric interview.

Treatment of psychiatric diagnosis does not necessarily result in reduction of suicide risk.

• Treatment associated with reduced psychiatric symptoms and suicidal behavior:– Lithium in bipolar

affective disorder (no RCT but Baldessarini et al, 1999 shows evidence in review of studies) (RCT in progress)

– Clozapine in schizophrenia (one RCT: Meltzer et al., 1998)

• Treatment not associated with reduced psychiatric symptoms and suicidal behavior:– Depression (Brent et al,

1997; Hawton et al, 2009; Khan et al., 2000; Khan et al, 2001; Lerner & Clum, 1990; Rutz, 1999)

– Psychosis (Khan et al., 2001)

– Depression in Borderline Personality Disorder (Linehan et al, 1991)

If you’re not treating diagnosis,what should you treat?

There are many stressors, including psychiatric diagnosis, experienced by suicidal individuals.

Secondary drivers of suicidality

Pain and Medical problems

HomelessnessFinancial Stress

Interpersonal conflict or loss

The most effective treatments focus on the unique problems of suicidal people that prevent them from solving secondary drivers.

Primary drivers of suicidality

Intense emotion dysregulation

Inability to solve problems

Reasons for dying (e.g., thinking they

are a burden)

Lack of reasons for living

Psychiatric interviews often do not create collaboration.

• Instead, the patient is more likely to feel interrogated (or even shamed if regretful).

• The patient may feel that you are only trying to run through a checklist, rather than trying to understand what is really going on.

• Patients are frequently aware that they can have their freedom taken away due to their suicide risk, so they can be leery of authority.

Jobes, 2007

Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality(CAMS)

Take steps to overtly demonstrate a desire to be collaborative.

THE CAMS APPROACHTHE CAMS APPROACH

THERAPIST & PATIENTTHERAPIST & PATIENT

SUICIDALITYSUICIDALITY

PAINPAIN STRESSSTRESS AGITATIONAGITATION

HOPELESSNESSHOPELESSNESS SELFSELF--HATEHATE

REASONS FOR LIVING VS. REASONS FOR DYINGREASONS FOR LIVING VS. REASONS FOR DYING

Mood

Collaborative Stance in CAMS

• Want to directly demonstrate to client that you empathize with the patient’s suicidal wish– “You have everything to gain and nothing to lose from

participating in this potentially life-saving treatment”.– You can always kill yourself later.

• At the same time, clarify when you would have to take action that they might not choose – know your personal and clinic limits– If they won’t participate in treatment…OR– If they say they can’t control their impulses…

Approached by Clinician (N=50)

Assessor Screen (N=50)

Accepted into Study (N=41)

Randomization Sample (N=32)

Rejected at Screening (N=9)•leaving the country = 1 •currently had provider = 3 •denied SI = 4 •wanted different treatment = 1

CAMS (N=14)

TAU (N=15)

Completed Treatment

(N=10)

Dropped Study Treatment (N=2)

Dropped out of Study Assessments

(N=0)

Completed Treatment

(N=12)

Did not attend first session (N=9)

Dropped Study Treatment (N=5)

Dropped out of Study Assessments

(N=3)

Harborview CAMSFeasibility TrialConsort Chart

Withdrawn from study (N=3)•too severe for study tx = 2 CAMS•court-ordered to treatment=1 TAU

Results for Suicidal Ideation

Bayesian Poisson HLM(because many zeros)

Posterior mean=-0.6295% CI: -1.19 - -0.04

Results on Overall Symptom Distress

Standard HLMt=-1.19 p=0.24

Client Satisfaction

Average client satisfaction was high for both treatments (range 1-4).Satisfaction higher for the CAMS treatment condition

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

CAMS

TAU

t(24)=-2.76 p=.01

Treatment Retention

86

67

0

20

40

60

80

100

Completed treatment (until crisisresolved)

CAMS

TAU

Total sessions ranged from low of 1 to high of 16 sessions:CAMS = 2 to 16 sessions (mean = 8.5), 7% subject had < 3 sessionsTAU = 1 to 11 sessions (mean = 4.5), 53% subjects had < 3 sessions

In summary

1.There are relatively few clinical trials for treatments for suicidality.

2.Standard of care interventions such as inpatient and anti-depressants do not have strong support.

3.Psychotherapy – particularly CBT and DBT have support.

4.Caring letters alone have support.5.Psychotherapy emphasizes collaboration and

directly treating suicidality. Perhaps this makes them more effective?

Questions?