Karol Kuli n ski Marine Chemistry and Biochemistry Department Supervisor: Janusz Pempkowiak
description
Transcript of Karol Kuli n ski Marine Chemistry and Biochemistry Department Supervisor: Janusz Pempkowiak
Karol Kulinski
Marine Chemistry and Biochemistry Department
Supervisor: Janusz Pempkowiak
Carbon cycling in the Baltic Sea
Introduction Goal Methods Conclusion
CARBOOCEAN final meetingBergen, 5-9.10.2009
Borges et al., 2006
•Global uptake by the shelf seas 0.33-0.36 Pg C yr-1
•Global emission from estuaries, salt marshes and mangroves -0.50 Pg C yr-1
•(Chen & Borges, 2009)
Coastal and marginal seas sink or source of CO2?
Introduction Goal Methods Conclusion
The Baltic Sea:
- Semi-enclosed shelf sea
- Sea surface: 385 000 km2
- Catchment area: 1 700 000
km2
- Water volume: 23 000 km3
- River run-off : 428 km3
Baltic Sea sink or source of CO2?
• 10.8 g C m-2 yr-1 (Thomas et al.,
2003)
• 36.0 g C m-2 yr-1 (Kuss et al., 2006)
• -35.4 g C m-2 yr-1 (Algesten et al.,
2006)HELCOM, 2007
Introduction Goal Methods Conclusion
Baltic Sea
North Sea
Atmosphere
Land
Sediments
Fs
Fm
Fr
Fp
Ff
Fo Fa
Fe
Fi
Box model
Fi – input from the North SeaFe – output to the North SeaFo – precipitationFa – net CO2 exchange with atmophereFf – fisheries
Fp – point sourcesFr – river run-offFm – return flux from sedimentsFs – sedimentation
∑inputs = ∑outputs
Fi + Fe + Fo + Fa + Ff + Fp + Fr + Fm + Fs =
0
Fa = Fi + Fe + Fo + Ff + Fp + Fr + Fm + Fs
Inputs – positive
Outputs - negative
Introduction Goal Methods Conclusion
HELCOM, 2007
Carbon input from rivers is quantified based on the national monitoring programmes data.
Database :Period 2003-2008Monthly means of TOC and TIC concentrationsMonthly means water volume
63 the largest rivers 85% of the total water volume from river run-off
F = C • VF- carbon fluxC – carbon concentrationV – water volume
River run-off
Introduction Goal Methods Conclusion
North Sea
Baltic Sea
Carbon exchange between the Baltic and the North Sea
x + y = 1
SalB · x + SalNS · y = SalMod
x – Baltic water contribution
y – North Sea water contribution
Introduction Goal Methods Conclusion
Hydrodynamical model CMOD
•Period: VI.2002 – V.2006
•Time resolution: 1 hour
•Horizontal resolution: 2 nm
•Vertical resolution: 1mParameters:
•Water volume
•Salinity
•Temperature
F = C • VF- carbon fluxC – carbon concentrationV – water volume
Baltic Sea DIC
Thomas & Schneider,
1999
North Sea DIC
Prowe et al., 2009
North Sea
Baltic Sea
Carbon concentrations seasonality
DOC extrapolated from the weekly measurements in the near-shore zone.
Introduction Goal Methods Conclusion
•Algesten et al., 2006•Emeis et al., 2000•Christoffersen et al., 2007•PIG, 2005•Błaszczyszyn, 1982
Organic carbon deposition to the sediments
Surface of depositional
areas and the organic
carbon accumulation
rates are adopted from:
Introduction Goal Methods Conclusion
gradientionsconcentratcarbon
tcoefficiendiffusionsediement
porosity
fluxdiffusion
x
C
D
Jx
CDJ
sed
sed
Ullman & Aller, 1982
Carbon return flux from sediments
DOC and DIC fluxes from sediments are calculated
usingFick’s First Law
Introduction Goal Methods Conclusion
Baltic Sea
North Sea
Atmosphere
Land
Sediments
Fi = 3,90
Fe = -11,63Fr =
10,90
Fs =
-3,7
8
Fm =
1,1
4
Fp = 0,04
Ff = -0,06
Fo =
0,5
7
Fa =
-1,0
8
Values are in Tg C yr-
1
River run-offIC: 62%OC: 38%
Import from the North SeaIC: 95%OC: 5%Export to the North SeaIC: 83%OC: 17%
Deposition to the sedimentsOC: 100%
Return flux from the sedimentsIC: 91%OC: 9%
Net CO2 emission to the
atmosphere
-2.8 g C m-2 yr-1 ± 2.1 g C m-2 yr-1
Introduction Goal Methods Conclusion
Thank you
Chisholm, 2000
Anthropogenic CO2 emission ~6.5 Pg C yr-1 50% of this is accumulated in the atmosphere
~28-30% ocean uptake~20-22% land uptake
(Emerson & Hedges, 2008; Sabine et al., 2004; Takahashi et al., 2002 & 2009)
Introduction Goal Methods Conclusion