Kansas State University

33
Kansas State University High energy 6.2 fs pulses J. R. Macdonald Laboratory Shambhu Ghimire , Bing Shan, and Zenghu Chang Kansas Light Source Group

description

High energy 6.2 fs pulses. Shambhu Ghimire , Bing Shan, and Zenghu Chang. Kansas Light Source Group. J. R. Macdonald Laboratory. Kansas State University. Summary. A shorter pulse ? A higher energy pulse ? Limitations for producing such pulses Our approach of obtaining a higher energy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Kansas State University

Page 1: Kansas State University

Kansas State University

High energy 6.2 fs pulses

J. R. Macdonald Laboratory

Shambhu Ghimire, Bing Shan, and Zenghu Chang

Kansas Light Source Group

Page 2: Kansas State University

Summary

• A shorter pulse ?• A higher energy pulse?• Limitations for producing such pulses• Our approach of obtaining a higher

energy• Measurement of the pulse• Further possibilities

Page 3: Kansas State University

Applications of attosecond pulses

Time scale

as psfszs10-18 s 10-15 s 10-12 s10-21 s

Progress

Page 4: Kansas State University

HHG

e-

Attosecond pulse train by HHG

Half Cycle

HHG as pulse Train

Driving fs Pulse

Gastunnel

ionization+ re-collision

e-

E(t)

Experimental ObservationHHG Spectrum: Discrete Spectral

Lines

Page 5: Kansas State University

Discrete harmonic orders in the plateau

-Spatial analogy of pulse train interference

Single slit

Double slit

Multi slit

Diffraction patterns(spatial frequency)

Discrete pattern at plateau analogy to multi-slit diffraction

Page 6: Kansas State University

Shorter fs-pulse to get a single atto-pulse

Harmonic generation

??

Super continuum at near cutoff

With ~25 fs pulses

With ~10 fs pulses

With ~5 fs pulses

fs-pulses Atto-pulses

??

Traditional method : generation of single atto-second pulses

Page 7: Kansas State University

P. B. Corkum, N. H. Burnett, and M. Y. Ivanov, Opt. Lett. 19, 1870 (1994)V. T. Platonenko and V. V. Strelkov J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 16, 435 (1999)

p

Left Circular Pulse

Right Circular Pulse

Td

e-

e-

e-

Polarization gating for a single atto-pulse

Ellipticity dependent pulse

Page 8: Kansas State University

1) Polarization gating method

Shorter gate

Using a shorter pulse

Using a longer delay

High energy, ultra-short pulse

d

p

Tt

2

2.0 3.0

available short pulse

2) Traditional method

To cover broader wavelength range of a atto-pulse

Limits

final energy at gate

Page 9: Kansas State University

Our goal

To scale up the energy of a few cycle pulses

Page 10: Kansas State University

I t( ) Io e

4 ln 2( )t

2

n I( ) n0

n2I t( ) t

2 n

2 I t( ) L

o

o

Spectral broadening by SPM

I (t)

n(t)

no

wtd

d

t

o

t( )

t( )

Non linear medium

I (w)

I (w)

Page 11: Kansas State University

Pulse compression by - GVD

Self Phase modulation

Compressor

Page 12: Kansas State University

Experimental setupGeneration of a few cycle pulses

FROG

f = 1mO D = 6mmI D = 0.4mm

f = 2.5 mAr- gas

Hollow core fiber/ chirp compressor technique

Page 13: Kansas State University

Previous work and Limitations

• Self focusing along with self phase modulation• Self de-focusing by plasma formation

Higher Energy ~ 0.5 mJ1

Shorter Pulse Duration ~ 5 fs 1

• Achievable spectral broadening by SPM • Bandwidth limitation of compressor technique

1S. Sartania, Z. Cheng, M. Lenzner, G. Tempea, Ch. Spielmann, and F. Krausz, Optic Letters, 22,20 (1997).

Page 14: Kansas State University

Limitations

I (r)

I (r)

no+n2I (r)

no - n e

Self-focusing

Self-defocusing

f=1m

f=1m

n (I) = no + n2 I

n (I) = no - Ne/ 2Ncr

Page 15: Kansas State University

Our approach

Higher Energy

Shorter Pulse Duration

• Broader spectrum with higher input circular polarization

Linear polarization input Circular polarization input

• lower self-focusing with circular polarization• Reduced ionization greatly reduces self de-

focusing

Page 16: Kansas State University

Reducing self focusing

n (r) = no + nL2 I (r)

n (r) = no + nC2 I (r)

Radial distance in micrometer

0

2 1013

4 1013

6 1013

6 1013

0

I r( )

300300 r

190 80 0 140 2500

1 10 6

2 10 6

3 10 6

4 10 6

5 10 6

4.704 106

1.378 107

nL r( )

nC r( )

250250 r

A Gaussian pulse

Nonlinear index of refraction

nC2

nL2= 1.5

Page 17: Kansas State University

Preserving self phase modulation

b4 a n

2 I L 0

F f 1b

a

2

n (r) = no + nL2 . I (r) n (r) = no + nC2

. I (r)

Chirp parameter Output band width

Linear polarization input Circular polarization input

=

Page 18: Kansas State University

Reducing self defocusing

F

2 Fo

F.A. Ilkov et al. J. Phys. B, 25 (1992)A.M. Perelomov et al. JETP, 24, (1966)

Selection rule : Less ionization channels in circular

Reducing field by 0.7 reduces ionization by >1 order

Multiphoton ionization Tunneling ionization

Page 19: Kansas State University

Reducing self defocusing

)()( 0 InnIn cr

gas

N

NIIPIn

.2

).()(

Lower field of circular input lead to decrease in ionization

By using circular polarization input

nC F( ) 0.0086IPC F( )nL F( ) 0.0086IPL F( ) IPL

Page 20: Kansas State University

Combined effects : SF and SDF

0)( nRrn

SDFSF

60 107.4)0( nrn 008.0)0( 0 nrn

0)( nRrn 0)( nRrn

Linear input

Circular input

0)0( nrn

0)( nRrn

0)0( nrn

Complicated profile

Single mode

Page 21: Kansas State University

Measured spatial profiles

a) b) c) d)

Input Energy

0.55 mJ 1.0 mJ 1.2 mJ1.2 mJ

vacuum Ar-gas Ar-gas Ar-gas

Linear

Circular

Page 22: Kansas State University

Throughput energy in vacuum

0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.20.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

Outp

ut E

nerg

y (

mJ)

Input Energy (mJ)

Linear Circular

Page 23: Kansas State University

Scaling up energy by circular polarization

Ar-gas pressure at ~ 1 atm

0.6 0.8 1.0 1.20.35

0.40

0.45

0.50

0.55

0.60

0.65

Linear-Threshold

Circular-Threshold

Outp

ut E

nerg

y (

mJ)

Input Energy (mJ)

Circular Linear

Page 24: Kansas State University

Scaling up energy by circular polarization

0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

Linear-Threshold

Circular-Threshold

Outp

ut E

nerg

y (

mJ)

Input Energy (mJ)

Linear Circular

Ar-gas pressure at ~ 0.5 atm

Page 25: Kansas State University

Broader spectrum for circular input

Ar-gas pressure at ~ 0.5 atm

600 700 800 9000.0

0.5

1.0

Inte

nsi

ty (

norm

aliz

ed)

Wavelength (nm)

At circularthreshold

At linearthreshold

CircularAt linearthreshold

Page 26: Kansas State University

Time Delay Stage

Spectrometer and CCD

BBO Crystal

I(t)

lens

50% BS

I (t-ז)

Tim

e (f

s)

Wavelength (nm)

Filter

Measurement of the pulses

FROG- Experimental setup

Page 27: Kansas State University

Measurement of pulsesmeasured FROG traces

Input pulse Output pulse

Wavelength (nm) Wavelength (nm)

Tim

e d

ela

y (

fs

) Tim

e d

elay

( fs )

1 pixel horizontal = 0.291 nm, 1pixel vertical = 0.716 fs

Page 28: Kansas State University

Measurement of input pulses

-100 -50 0 50 1000.0

0.5

1.0

33 fs

Intensity Phase

Time (fs)

Inte

nsity (

norm

aliz

ed)

0

5

10

15

20

Phase (ra

d)

Page 29: Kansas State University

Measurement of input pulses

725 750 775 800 825 850 8750.0

0.5

1.0

Reconstructed measured

Wavelength (nm)

Inte

nsity

(no

rmal

ized

)

Time

Time

(d)

Fre

que

ncy

Fre

que

ncy

Measured

Reconstructed

Page 30: Kansas State University

Measurement of output pulses

-20 -10 0 10 200.0

0.5

1.0

6.2 fs

Intensity Phase

Time (fs)

Inte

nsity (

norm

aliz

ed)

0

2

4

6

8

10

Phase (ra

d)

0.6 mJ, 6.2 fs pulses at rep. rate of 1k Hz

Page 31: Kansas State University

Measurement of output pulses

600 700 800 900 10000.0

0.5

1.0

Inte

nsity (

no

rma

lized

)

Wavelength (nm)

Retrieved Measured

(d)

Measured

Reconstructed

Fre

que

ncy

Fre

que

ncy

Time

Time

Page 32: Kansas State University

Results

• 0.6 mJ, 6.2 fs pulses by Hollow Core/Chirp compressor technique

• Scaling up the pulse energy by a factor of 1.5 by using circular input

• Demonstration of measurement of sub-10 fs pulses with SHG-FROG

Page 33: Kansas State University

Further possibilities

Obtaining even higher energy and a shorter pulse

• By lowering gas pressure and further increasing input energy

• By using Ne gas instead of Ar• By improving the compressor technique to

compress a broader spectra