K6 Optical Sources and Amplifierspeople.ee.ethz.ch/~fyuriy/oe/oe_optcom_chapters/...Basic concepts...

72
K6 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009 6-1 diode laser- crystal Heatsink (Diamant) SOA I InP-LED, Light Emitting Diode with integrated lens 6 Optical Sources and Amplifiers 12/02/2009 Fiber Semiconductor Optical Amplifier with fiber coupling (SOA, courtesy OptoSpeed SA) Diode Laser with salt crystal as a comparison

Transcript of K6 Optical Sources and Amplifierspeople.ee.ethz.ch/~fyuriy/oe/oe_optcom_chapters/...Basic concepts...

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-1

    diode laser- crystal

    Heatsink (Diamant)

    SOA

    I

    InP-LED, Light Emitting Diode with integrated lens

    6 Optical Sources and Amplifiers 12/02/2009 ← Fiber Semiconductor Optical Amplifier with fiber coupling (SOA, courtesy OptoSpeed SA)

    Diode Laser with salt crystal as a comparison

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-2

    Goals of the chapter: • Functional concepts, design and analysis of semiconductor based components for light

    generation and amplification

    • Light Emitting Diodes (LED) as incoherent sources based on spontaneous light emission

    • Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation (LASER) as a light oscillator and major current-modulated source of coherent mono-chromatic light from semiconductor pn-heterojunction diodes

    • Semiconductor and Solid State Optical Amplifier (SOA) as a light amplifier with THz-bandwidth Methods for the solution:

    • LED, Diode-Lasers and SOAs can be treated in the frame-work of the rate equation formalism • Calculation of static emission vers. current P-I of LED and LASERS and amplification characteristics gain

    vers. current of SOAs • Small and large signal modulation and noise analysis models are developed

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-3

    6 Optical Sources and Amplifiers:

    Schematic functional blocks and devices of a modern 40 Gb/s (4x10Gb/s) fiberoptic TDM Link:

    data input

    data output

    80Gb/s MUX with InP/InGaAs-DHBT, I. Schnyder, IfE, ETHZ

    waveguideUTC

    SOAwaveguideUTC

    SOA

    2ps-pulse generating InGaAsP-diode laser, H-J., Lohe, R. Scoillo, H.J. Lohe IfE, ETHZ

    PIN-Photo-diode

    TransimpedanceAmp

    9 μm

    PIN-Photo-diode

    TransimpedanceAmp

    9 μm

    • 40 Gb/s fiber-optics is commercial

    and being deployed • 80-160 Gb/s TDM-systems are de-

    monstrated for feasibility but the electronics is not yet commercial.

    No fundamental bottle-neck. DRLM DRLM

    Frequency-Phase Locked Loop

    VCO

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-4

    lense

    free-space wave

    active media

    Introduction:

    Fiberoptic application depend on compact, fast and easy to modulate (10-40 Gb/s) nearly monochromatic light sources adapted to the optimal fiber transmission wavelength bands of 850nm , 1200 – 1700nm (IR=infra red).

    with the realization of fast (GHz – several 10 GHz) optical sources, such as LEDs and in particular of diode lasers, operating at low current densities, the optoelectronic communication technology achieved a breakthrough in the 70-ties.

    The basic achievement was the invention of the double heterojunction (DH) diode structure, providing the solution for a 1000-fold reduction of the operation and threshold currents of diode LASERs in the order of a few 10uA.

    The introduction of the optical amplifier in the 90-ties, eliminating the electronic „bottle-neck“ for amplification and opened the path to extremely broadband, optically transparent networks.

    Basic concepts of optical / electronic interaction in active optoelectronic devices:

    a) Active planar (wafer plane) waveguides b) free-space and guided beam vertically emitting devices - Long interaction length, high intensity, small dimensions - short interaction length, weak intensity, larger dimensions - Current flow vertical to the light propagation - current flow co-linear to the light propagation

    Pump current

    Pump current

    Light emission

    t

    Light emission

    t

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-5

    Confinement of Electrons and Photons: Device Concepts Maximizing the interaction of electrons and photons in a device requires confining them into the same space (eg. active core of WG) at high density

    - guiding photons by dielectric waveguides (WG, resonators) or free space optics requires optical confinement by dielectric contrasts

    - localized injection or extraction of electrons into or from potential boxes in SC requires electrical carrier confinement by potential barriers

    Active waveguides: the dielectric SC-WG contains the “active” (interacting) SC-material (often in the WG core)

    charge carriers confined for high density by - potential barriers at heterojunction interfaces and - local electrical contacts

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-6

    Carrier Injection / Extraction Processes in pn-junctions

    In optoelectronic devices the resonant interaction with photons generates e-h-pairs (absorption, PD) or destroys e-h-pairs by stimulated (gain, SOA, LASERs) or spontaneous emission (LED).

    Generated or required e-h-pairs are extracted or supplied, resp. injected into the active WG material

    Carrier Injection or Extraction is realized by forward- or backward biased pn-junctions:

    Carrier extraction: reverse biased pn-junction (PD) Carrier injection: forward biased pn-junction (SOA, LED, LASER)

    Strong electric field E in the depletion layer w transports by drift the photogenerated electron to the n-contact and holes to the p-contact

    photogenerated “reverse” photocurrent Iph carrier density n,p → 0 in the depletion layer

    Electrons (holes) diffuse from the n- and p-contact through the depletion layer w to the p(n)-contact where they recombine radiatively as minority carriers

    injection current generates photon flow minority carrier density are high population inversion and optical gain

    hv

    e

    h

    hID

    e

    ehID

    hv

    e

    h

    p n p n

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-7

    Optoelectronic Device Requirements: LED, LASER and SOA

    a) Fundamental requirements for Light Sources in fiberoptic applications:

    1) Emission-wavelength at dispersion or attenuation minimum of optical glass fibers: λ=1.3 and 1.5μm (Eg~ 0.80, 0.93 eV) 2) Minimal spectral width (Fourier-limit) Δλ, resp. Δω~1/B (B=data rate) of the optical emission spectrum for minimal

    pulse broadening and high data rates 3) Simple and efficient current-modulation of the light intensity or light frequency (phase) at high modulation-bandwidth,

    high linearity and with low optical noise 4) Compact, efficient monolithic device realization and low operation power 5) Small emission area, resp. high spatial and temporal coherence of the light emission for diffraction limited focusing

    down into the μm-sized core of optical fibers and adapted to the fiber NA 6) Small dynamic emission wavelength λ shift (frequency-chirp) during modulation for minimal dispersion in the fiber

    • Diode laser fulfils all requirements almost ideally with the exception of 6). • LEDs fail in 2), partially 3), 5) and 6), LED are therefore only suited for short distances and MM-fibers

    b) Requirements for Optical Amplifiers:

    1) High gain per length at: λ=1.3 and 1.5μm 2) Low insertion losses 3) Efficient pumping and simple, compact pumping mechanism 4) High optical bandwidth and low optical noise 5) Low intermodulation between different wavelength channels

    • EDFA (Erbium doped fiber amplifiers) fail 3)

    • SOAs (semiconductor optical amplifiers) fail on 2) and 5)

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-8

    6.1 SC pn-Junction devices for light generation

    Important material requirements for SC-materials for light generation / amplification are:

    • Bandgap Eg sets emission at telecom wavelength of (0.8), 1.3, 1.55μm, resp. Eg~ (1.45), 0.93 - 0.80 eV, using (GaAs/AlGaAs) and InP/InGaAsP

    • Direct optical transitions for gain (not necessary for absorption in photodetectors) • Optical Confinement in waveguides requires a strong dependence of refractive index n on the composition of the ternary /

    quaternary compound SC crystal (high dielectric contrast Δn)

    • Carrier Confinement in light emitters requires strong dependence of bandgap Eg on crystal composition and suitable band alignment and off-sets ΔEc, ΔEv for efficient Double Heterojunction (DH) diodes

    • Long carrier lifetime for low threshold currents (low crystal defect density, long spont. lifetime) Generic InP-InGaAsP-InP-pin-diode DH-structure with a planar ridge-waveguide:

    I

    Popt front mirror

    ridge waveguide optical farfield

    Barrier ΔEc for electron confinement

    Barrier ΔEv for hole confinement

    Lateral Rib- Stripe- Waveguide Contact w ~3-5μm

    Lateral optical and Current Confinement

    Light field (mode)

    Active layer

    Bottom ohmic contact

    Planar InP-InGaAsP-InP 3-layer waveguide

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-9

    Most optoelectronic devices must provide by geometrical and material design

    1) 2 dimensional waveguide structure vertical and lateral optical confinement (Δnlateral, Δnvertical)

    2) DH- and stripe-contact structure for vertical and lateral carrier confinement (ΔΕC, ΔΕV, lateral contact width w)

    6.1.1 Material requirements for SC for optoelectonic devices

    Direct optical Band-to-Band-transition

    For a non-zero matrix element vc uru the wavevector k of the conduction band minima and the valence band maxima must be identical k-conservation rule .

    Indirect SC (Si, Ge) Direct SC (III-V): GaAlAs, GaInAsP, GaN… II-VI: ZnSe)

    Bild

    k

    For details on materials / fabrication technology of optoelectronic devices see literature [11,7].

    electrons , e direct transition at k=0 (energy minimum/maximum for e and h) holes, h

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-10

    Material systems for specific mission-wavelength and bandgap Eg

    Because the gain-maximum gmax(Emax) occurs slightly above bandgap Eg, the Emission Wavelength λ of a direct SC (for Laser, LED) is determined mainly by the Bandgap Eg. Eg determines also the absorption edge of the SC (for Photodiodes, Modulators)

    The bandgap Eg is a function of crystal composition: GaAs : λ=0.85μm → Eg=1.45eV

    InxGa1-xAs : λ=0.98μm → Eg=1.26eV GaxIn1-xAsyP1-y : λ=1.35μm → Eg=0.92eV : λ=1.55μm → Eg=0.80eV (AlxGa1-x)yIn1-yP : λ=0.65μm → Eg=1.90eV

    GaN : λ=0.35μm → Eg=3.53eV

    AlN : λ=0.35μm → Eg=3.53eV UV Visible IR Communication- FIR wavelengths

    [ ]g 0 gE c / eVλ≅

    The Bandgap Eg and electron affinity χ determine the also:

    potential-barriers in conduction- and valence band ΔEC, ΔEV at the heterojunctions.

    Direct Compound-SC-crystals for different wavelengths regions:

    Emission wavelength of direct compound semiconductor material systems:

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-11

    Control of the refractive index n by the crystal composition

    For the realization of 2D-dielectric waveguides in optoelectronic components use is made of the property of SCs, that the refractive index n together with the bandgap Eg can be changed spatially by modification of the material composition x,y by the material growth (epitaxy), etching processes and regrowth of material

    Bandgap Eg and refractive index n of Ga1-xAlxAs and GaxIn1-xAsyP1-y versus composition x,y:

    x, y = crystal compositions

    x 1 xgroup Vgroup III

    x 1 x y 1 y

    group III group V

    Al Ga As

    Ga In As P

    − −

    Trend: n ~1/Eg

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-12

    Lattice matching (Gitteranpassung) for different crystal compositions:

    To grow epitaxially layers of semiconductors with different n and Eg onto a monocrystalline substrate (eg. GaAs, InP, GaP) without crystal defects, the lattice constants a of the different layers and the substrate have to be matched closely (Δa/a< 10-4).

    Bandgap versus lattice constant diagram for various ternary material systems:

    GaAs-Substrate InP-Substrate (automatic matching) (concentration (x,y) dependent matching)

    AlGaAs, Al-Variation

    InGaAsP, P-Variation

    InP (binary)

    GaAs (binary)

    InAs (binary) Ga0.47In0.53As (ternary)

    In1-xGaxAsyP1-y

    (quaternary)

    InGaP (ternary)

    Increasing Ga Increasing P

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-13

    Suitable Band-Offsets ΔEC, ΔEV for Carrier-Confinement in Hetero-Junction pn-Diodes

    For the realization of an effective vertical Carrier-Confinement in the active layer (Eg2) of optoelectronic heterojunction-devices the following conditions for n and Eg must be fulfilled simultaneously:

    g1 g3 g 2

    1 3 2

    1 ) E , E E and

    2 ) n , n n

    >

    < 2: active layer, 1,3: cladding layer

    But also the resulting band-barriers ΔEC (C-band) and ΔEV (V-band) must properly aligned and have large enough values ΔE >>6-7kT

    Anderson-Model for single Heterojunction interface: (unbiased pn Heterojunction, equilibrium)

    n1 , Eg1

    n3 , Eg3

    n2 , Eg2

    ΔE12 ΔE23

    InP GaAlAs InGaAs GaAs InP GaAlAs

    P depletion layer w N

    Band-offset ΔE depends on (no proof)

    - bandgaps Eg and

    - electron affinities χ:

    ( )

    ( ) 21 2

    21

    10

    0

    6V g

    CE

    see append x

    E

    i

    ;

    E χ

    χΔ = −Δ

    Δ = −Δ + Δ

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-14

    active layer d d electron-barrier hole-barrier

    Forward Bias: FQ,n FQ,p DE E V−

    Degenerate n and p doping for reaching FQ,n C V FQ,pE E 0 und E E 0− > − > (eg. cladding layers for laser diodes)

    The doping in the layers (in particular for SC-laser diodes) must be high enough to reach the

    inversion requirement of Barnard-Durafough:

    FQ,n FQ,p gE E E− >

    Bandalignment in forward biased (VD>0) P-AlGaAs – i-GaAs – N-AlGaAs Double Heterojunction (DH)-Diode:

    ID

    d

    Quasi-neutrality n=p (assumption)

    eVD

    ID

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-15

    6.2 Light Emitting Diodes, LEDs Forward biased Light Emitting Diodes (LED) are the simplest optoelectronic light source generating incoherent radiation from electron-hole recombination by spontaneous light emission in current pumped direct SC pn-junctions. As each injected e-h-pair generates ideally one photon the optical power Pout is proportional to the diode current ID.

    Basic Properties:

    - LEDs generate light by spontaneous emission of radiation in current pumped pn- or pin-junction diodes.

    - the emission wavelength is determined by the bandgap Eg of the active layer

    - the spontaneous radiation is temporal and spatial incoherent, unpolarized and broadband and can not be focused to the diffraction limit (only for MM-fibers)

    - IR-LED are important low-cost, low power (~100μW) light sources for low bandwidth (~100MHz 1 GHz) applications with multimode-fibers over short distances

    - Visible LEDs are important for highly efficient, long-life display and illumination applications

    6.2.1 Spontaneous Light Emitter with current-pumped pn-Diodes

    Concept of carrier injection in forward biased pn-junctions • Electrical carrier injection in pn-junction is technological simple, efficient and very fast.

    • Spontaneous emission from injected e-h-pair recombination is the simplest form of light generation in SC.

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-16

    Electrical Pumping: Carrier Injection in pn-Homojunctions junctions

    Drawback of the simple pn-Homojunction diode:

    - the thickness d of the active injection volume is large, comparable to the minority carrier diffusion lengths d~(Lp+Ln)~2-4μm and the carrier densities remain low. - the bandgap Eg is constant for the whole pn-structure the light can be reabsorbed in cladding layers and substrate !

    Injection volume V=dA where non-equilibrium minority carrier, resp. e-h-pair density is high

    The e-h-pair injection rate or pump rate Rpump caused by the diode current ID is: Assuming all injected e-h-pairs recombine by photon emission the emitted isotropic total photon flux φ from the volume V is:

    ( )0 0

    pump D

    equilibrium e and h densities

    Ad R I / e

    n p n , p − −

    =

    = >> =

    ( ) ( )spont pump Dopt,internal D

    Ad R Ad R I / e and

    P hv hv / eI

    φ

    φ

    = = =

    = =

    ID

    A

    d

    hv

    ep

    eVD

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-17

    Carrier Confinement in Heterojunctions Diodes

    • Potential barriers ΔEV and ΔEC confine the electron to a thickness d

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-18

    6.2.2 Light Emitting Diodes (LED):

    Control of broadband emission wavelength by:

    The bandgap of the active layer Eg, resp. material composition of the SC determine the emission wavelength

    6.2.2.1 Planar structures of LEDs

    Example: p-AlGaAs/i-GaAs/n-AlGaAs-DH-LED:

    2-

    80μm

    electron-barrier ΔEc

    Hole barrierΔEv

    EFQ,C

    EF,V

    A

    Current I

    Light Popt

    Band diagram for forward bias:

    spontaneous e-h-pair-recombination

    VD ~ Eg/e ≅(EFQ,n – EFQ,p)/e

    Pout

    Planar, lensed InP-LED:

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-19

    Advantages of LEDs:

    1) relative small active (typ. 50x50x0.1μm) volume (GaAs) and transparent, nonabsorbing (AlGaAs-) cladding layers resulting in relative high quantum efficiency

    2) cheap and simple planar device structure Drawbacks of LEDs:

    1) broad emission spectrum, several 10nm high signal dispersion 2) modest modulation bandwidth < 1GHz (carrier lifetime limited) 3) low to moderate light emission efficiency, large emission area, not suited for SM-fibers large (50-100mA) operation currents

    6.2.2.2 Rate-equation description and PI-Characteristics • Spontaneous e-h-pair recombination (Rspont) converts the electrical excitation energy by current pumping ID into light Pmax. • Pmax=(ηihv/e) ID • Stimulated emission (Rcv,net) and amplification is small because the photon density sph and gain-length ~d is small. • spontaneous emission occurs non-directional into all spatial modes (Lambertian radiation pattern).

    The conduction- and valence-bands of the active volume Ad are considered as pumped “reservoirs” for electrons and holes with densities n and p.

    The active region is assumed to be undoped such that n=p (quasi-neutrality)

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-20

    ( )

    pump 21,net spont

    21,net spont spont

    pump spont

    D Di D i

    spontspont

    with the assumption of a constant spontaneous lifetime

    V active volume and nV N number of electrons in V

    with

    0 R R R

    R R n /

    R R 0 dA V

    I N I0 N I nVe e

    τ

    η η ττ

    = = =

    = + − −

    = =

    spontR

    int

    Ad)

    int ernal quantum efficiency ~ 80 90%η = −

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-21

    φkrit

    n2 ~1 (air)

    n1~3.5 (SC)

    total reflection angle:n2

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-22

    VD-ID-Characteristic of LEDs (voltage-current characteristic) Knowing n(ID)=p(ID) in the active volume, we can in principle determine the Voltage-Current-characteristic VD(ID) from the dependence of quasi-Fermi-levels EFQ,n(n) , EFQ,p(p) on the carrier density n,p: Concept: in non-equilibrium the external diode voltage VD must be equal to the the separation of the quasi-Fermi-levels. Procedure: n, p(ID) → EFQ,n(n) ; EFQ,p(p) → VD(ID)=EFQ,n(n)/e + EFQ,p(p)/e

    ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

    Dspont

    D FQ,n FQ,p eff ,n 1/ 2 FQ,n eff ,n 1/ 2 FQ,p

    1 1FQ,n C 1/ 2 V QF ,p 1/ 2

    eff ,n eff ,p

    In p quasi-neutralityV e

    V E n E p with n N F E and p N F E

    n nE E kT F , and analog E E kT FN N

    τ

    − −

    = =

    = − = =

    ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞− = − =⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟

    ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠

    ( ) ( ) ( )1 1D DD D 1 / 2 1 / 2 geff ,n eff ,p

    n I n IV I kT F kT F E

    N N− −⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= + +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟

    ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠

    V-I-characteristic (intern) ( + voltage drop ΔV across access resistance RS ΔV= ID Rs )

    As the equation can not be solved analytically one often approximates the pn-heterojunction characteristic by an exponential:

    D DD S D

    S

    V e kT II I exp 1 ideality factor V ln 1kT e I

    ηηη

    ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞= − = = +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟

    ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-23

    Spectral Properties:

    • spontaneous emission represents “optical noise” (caused by random spontaneous emission processes) which is temporal and spatial incoherent (random)

    • the lack of spatial coherence prevents focussing the radiation to the diffraction limit ( very small coupling efficiency to SM-fibers)

    • the emission spectrum is relatively broad (typ. Δλ~100nm which is ~ 7% of the bandgap Eg) The large spectral width is determined by the current dependent band-filling of the C- and V-band by the injected electrons (n) and holes (p) (energy spread of the carriers)

    The broadband spectrum is not ideal for low dispersion applications. Spectral broadening by band-filling and thermal spreading in LEDs:

    EFQ,n EFQ,p

    λmin λmaxλmin λmax

    ( )30 20E ~ kT ~ meV ~ nmΔ ≡

    ( )30 20E ~ kT ~ meV ~ nmΔ ≡

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-24

    Popt,out-ID-Characteristic of different long-wavelength LED with Fiber coupling:

    LEDs produce spatially and temporally incoherent radiation from an area A>>λopt2, which can not be focused to the diffraction limit ~λopt.

    Because the emission area A (φ ~10-100 μm) of LEDs is considerably larger than the core of Single-Mode (SM)-Fibers (φ~8μm), coupling also by optical means (eg. lenses) produces large coupling losses.

    In additions LEDs behave almost as Lambertian-radiation with large beam angles (typ.~900), which is much larger than the

    acceptance angle of fibers (typ. NA~0.1 –0.2)

    Thermal heating

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-25

    6.2.3 LED-Device Design and Properties

    6.2.2.1 Surface and Edge-emitting LEDs

    Surface Emitting LEDs: Edge-Emitter LED:

    (with planar waveguide and stripe contact)

    • High optical power/area ratio • Small emission area, (~stripe contact width) • Waveguide with mirrors (avoiding lasing !) • Relative high fiber coupling efficiency • High modulation bandwidth (small

    capacitance) • Light emission vertical to current flow

    Direct MM-fiber butt-coupling

    • Poor optical power/area ratio • Relative large emission area • Simple planar construction, no mirrors • Slow response and large junction

    capacitance (external RC time constant) • Light-emission through the surface

    and parallel to the current flow

    I

    Lens-MM-fiber coupling

    LED with ball-lens for better fiber coupling by beam collimation (focusing)

    NA

    50-60μm

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-26

    6.2.2.2 Small Signal Equations and Modulation-Transfer function M(ω)

    Concept: The modulated light flux is proportional to the modulated carrier density. Due to the finite carrier lifetime the carrier density can not follow the injection rate immediately.

    The lightpower Popt of a LED is modulated by a current ID(t), in particular by an additional small harmonic current modulation Δ

    j tDI e

    ωΔ ( ) ( ) ( )j t j t j tD D D opt optI t I I e , P t P Pe , n t n neω ω ω= + Δ = + Δ = + Δ small signal assumption

    Small signal Light-Current Modulation-Transfer function ( ) ( )opt ,outP

    MI

    ωω

    Δ=

    Δ:

    From the rate equation we calculate only the time-dependent parts Δn(t) and the modulated optical power ΔPopt(t)=ηemV Δn(t)/τspont ħω

    ( )

    pump 21,net spont

    stim spont

    Di opt em

    spont spont

    n R R R dA V V active volumet

    R R and N nV total carrier number in V

    I t N NN with P and jt e t

    η η ω ωτ τ

    ∂= + − − ∗ = =

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-27

    ( )

    pump spont

    Di D

    spont

    Static part : 0 R n /

    I Nj N N Ie

    τ

    ω ητ

    = −

    Δ ΔΔ = − → Δ Δ

    sponti

    D spont

    opt ,outem i

    D spon

    3dB sp

    t

    ont1/N 1 LP withI e 1 j

    P 1I e 1 j

    ωτ

    ηωτ

    ωη ηωτ

    τ−Δ

    =Δ +

    Δ=

    Δ +

    =

    Lowpass Modulation-Transfercharacteristic LEDs show in general:

    • modest bandwidth B (100- max. 1000 MHz), data rates ~100Mb/s • small optical power, a few 10-100μW in MM-fibers, short distances 1- ~100m only efficient coupling into MM-fibers with large diameters • large operation currents (50-150mA) and heating effects • large optical bandwidth (Δλ~50 - 100 nm) leading to dispersion • low cost in comparison to lasers

    LEDs are interesting for low-cost, short-distance (m – 100m) links with MM-Fibers with modest bit-rates

    The intrinsic (without the external RC-time constant due to the series resistance RS and the diffusion-capacitance CD) Bandwidth B=1/τspont of LEDs is carrier-lifetime limited and reaches values of a few 100 MHz.

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-28

    LED Applications

    The emission wavelength of LEDs is determined by the bandgap Eg depending on the material composition. • Current LEDs cover the total spectral range LED-Illumination: from blue-to-red:

    “White” LED = Blue LED + phosphorus converter

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-29

    LEDs have become very efficient emitters by eliminating reabsorption in the crystal (transparent substrates, back-side reflectors) and total reflection (structured surfaces).

    Typical LED Applications:

    LEDs are successful for display application and illumination at visible wavelengths

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-30

    6.3 Optical Amplifiers (semiconductor optical amplifier, SOA and Erbium doped fiber amplifier, EDFAs) During propagation in fibers lightwave signals suffer from reversible and irreversible distortions:

    a) Reversible distortions: attenuation and dispersion signal can be restored by amplification or dispersion compensation

    b) Accumulative, irreversible distortions: noise and random fluctuations, which can not be eliminated

    Optoelectronic repeaters are used to restore (amplitude, pulse width and postion) the digital signal after a max. propagation distance (typ. 10-100km) L, before the signal is no longer recoverable with out substantial information loss (bit errors).

    3R-Repeater Functions: Reamplification, Regenerate, Retime (today mostly electronically)

    optical electronic optical

    O/E-Converter (PD)/amplifier Electronic (Regeneration) E/O-Converter (LED/LASER/moduator)

    In communication systems of 1. - 3. generation optical signals had to be converted into electrical signals and processed by an electronic 3-R-repeater before being retransmitted in the optical domain again.

    For data rates >40 Gb/s the electronic circuits became a severe bottle-neck of bandwidth.

    A breakthrough was the transition to:

    amplification in the optical domain by optical amplifiers (OA) optical amplification with THz-bandwidth (parallel or serial format) is possible

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-31

    6.3.1 Concepts of SC and Fiber Optical Amplifiers (SOAs and EDFAs) Generic requirements for OAs:

    • High optical gain (20-50bB) • Low insertion losses • High optical bandwidth (10 – 50nm, ~2-10 THz) • High output power for power OA • Polarization independent gain • Lowest noise figure F (4-5dB) for preamp-OA

    1) Semiconductor Optical Amplifiers

    SOAs are devices performing a coherent amplification with THz bandwidth of an optical wave at frequency ω.

    SOA are based on the process of current or optical pumped stimulated emission of radiation R21,net(ω,n).

    The optical device gain G(ω) is a complex value an d the amplification is not noise-less (amplified spontaneous emission).

    SOAs are key for:

    - low-noise preamplifiers (F~6dB) with THz-bandwidth for optical signal amplification (no electronic bottle-neck !) - power amplifiers in fiberoptic signal distribution (Pout ~ 15dBm) - LASERs (Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation) for optical wave generation

    However signal regeneration and retiming is still done electronically doday.

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-32

    Active current-pumped WGs

    For strong interaction between photons and e/h pairs SOAs are often realized as current pumped active wave guides.

    - active layer provides optical gain by stimulated emission

    - active layer forms part of a current pumped pn-junction - active layer provides part of the high refractive index core of a planar waveguide structure

    Concept and Realization of SOAs: Input Pin (r

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-33

    Advantages SOAs: small (mm) size, efficient current pumping, high gain, low cost

    Drawbacks SOAs: high fiber-SOA coupling loss (3-5dB), “high” noise figure F~6dB, polarization sensitivity of G

    Waveguides and optical confinement (opt. confinement factor Γ) Active WG consist of a high index (ncore=n1) active core with the lowest bandgap defining the wavelength of the gain G(λ) and low-index (nclad=n2,n3), transparent high bandgap top, bottom and lateral cladding layers.

    Only a fraction Γ is confined to the active layer and amplified as G=eΓL.

    confinement factor Γ

    22 2

    2

    1d /

    active

    mod ed /

    AE dx / E dxA

    + +∞

    − −∞

    Γ = ≤∫ ∫

    Aactive, n1

    n2

    dn3 n3

    wn2 Amode

    Aactive, n1

    n2

    dn3 n3

    wn2 Amode

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-34

    2) Fiber Optical Amplifiers (eg. Er-doped Fiber Amplifier, EDFA at 1.55μm)

    FOA consist of 10 – 100m of optical glass fiber, containing active Erbium-ions in its core. Er+-ions form a 3-level system which is optically pumped by a diode pump-lasers producing with ~100-200 mW pump power at 980 or 1480 nm. Advantage of EDFA: 1) high gain G~40dB, 2) good fiber-coupling 3) low cross-talk between WDM-channels, 4) low noise.

    Drawbacks of EDFA: 1) expensive and large size, 2) low electrical efficiency.

    Schematic EDFA: Gain ≈ 40dB at 1.55 μm, bandwidth ≈ 5nm Erbium-doped Fiber:

    InGaAs/AlGaAs Pump-Diode Lasers: λ= 980 or 1480nm Popt ~100-200mW

    coupler: λ= 980 /1550nm

    Energy-levels of Er-ions in Glass (3-level system):

    980nm 1550nm Pump gain transition

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-35

    6.3.2 Optical material gain g in SCs vs. carrier density n and pump-current ID

    The small-signal material gain g(ω,n) in SC is often approximated to first order as a linear gain function with a “parabolic” frequency dependence.

    Practically the confinement factor Γ reduces the effective optical gain further

    geff=gΓ. Linear small-signal gain g

    ( )( )

    ( )

    L

    0

    g n z dzg n L

    homogeneouspumping

    G e e∫

    = =

    Non-linear, saturated gain g

    In SC the optical gain g(n,ω,P) at high power levels depends for large optical P also on the power itself mainly due to the carrier depletion processes by R21,net > Rspont, resp. P >Psat (saturation power as parameter) Gain Satturation

    ( ) ( )( )

    ( ) ( ) ( )

    ( )

    sat

    s

    tr 2 20

    max 0 trsat

    assumption

    tr

    tr

    at s

    1 1 Pg ,n a n nP z1 / P /

    1g n,P g ,n a n n1 P / P

    optical ban

    P

    P P saturation power ;dwidth , a n n unsaturated gainconfinement factor , n transparency carrier den

    ωω ω ω

    ω ω

    ω

    ∂Γ ≅ Γ − =

    ∂+ − Δ +

    Γ = Γ = ≅ Γ −+

    Δ = − =

    Γ =

    = =

    = sity

    g(ω,n)gmax(n)

    2Δω

    n

    ωo ω

    gmax(n,P)P/Psat=0)

    P/Psat

    ntr n

    g(ω,n)gmax(n)

    2Δω

    n

    ωo ω

    g(ω,n)gmax(n)

    2Δω

    n

    ωo ω

    gmax(n,P)P/Psat=0)

    P/Psat

    ntr n

    gmax(n,P)P/Psat=0)

    P/Psat

    ntr n

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-36

    ( ) ( )

    ( ) ( )

    ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

    D spont0 0 0 tr tr

    in out

    D spont0 tr

    g z optical power P z

    I 1g ,n ,z a n n a n PeLwd P z

    boundary conditions : P 0 P , P L P

    IP ,z P 0 e P 0 exp a n z ;

    eLwd

    with z L

    τω

    τω Γ

    ⎛ ⎞ ∂Γ ≅ Γ − = Γ − =⎜ ⎟ ∂⎝ ⎠

    = = →

    ⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞= = Γ −⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟

    ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠=

    ( ) D spontout0 0 trin

    IPG ,I exp a n LP eLwd

    τω

    ⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞= = Γ −⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟

    ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠

    6.3.2.1 Rate-equation description of SOAs

    Goal: determine the small signal (P

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-37

    6.3.2.2 Gain Saturation in SOAs (large signal gain)

    unsaturated device gain G0

    Including the local carrier depletion n(z)PSat as function of the SOA length L If g is constant we obtain the result of chap.4.3.4

    If P(z) > Psat then n(z)

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-38

    Observe: 1) n0 is the carrier density without saturation or carrier depletion (small signal) 2) in the above expression for G(ω0, n0), the local power P(z), the boundary values at z=0 and L Pin and Pout are contained implicitly in the integral and can not be expressed analytically.

    For the solution we eliminate g to obtain the saturated Gain G=Pout/Pin at ω=ω0:

    ( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( )( )

    ( )

    ( )out

    in

    00

    sat sat

    P out in out out in0 0 P

    sat sat in sat

    PL outdz dP

    0 Pin

    we take the exponential func

    P zP 1 gfrom the definition of g P = P g P z P P z P g zz P z 1 P z / P 1 P z / P

    1 1 P P P P Pg z P g L ln P lnP z P P P P

    =∫ ∫=

    ∂ ∂→ = = → ∂ = ∂ →

    ∂ ∂ + +

    ⎡ ⎤ − −∂ = + ∂ ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯→ = + = +⎢ ⎥

    ⎣ ⎦

    in

    outout in out outsat

    0 sat out sat sat

    out in

    P1P 1

    P P P P1 1 G 1P 1g L P P G P G Pout out out out

    0 0using the definitionin in in inG=P / P

    tion of both sides of the above equation:

    P P P PG e e e e e ; G unsaturatedP P P P

    − −⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞−⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠= = ⋅ = ⋅ = ⋅ = ⋅ = gain

    ( ) ( )

    ( )

    out outout out in 0 0

    sat sat

    0 0 satwe get an implicite equation for G, with

    G 1 P G 1 Pwith G L,P P / P exp g L / exp G / exp ; G saturated gainG P G P

    G exp g L = small signal gain (P

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-39

    ( )0 in insat

    G Pln G implicit equation for saturated gain G PG P

    ⎛ ⎞ ≅ ⇒⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠

    ( )

    ( ) ( ) ( )

    out,sat

    0 out ,sat 0

    out ,sat 0 0 0

    We are looking for the saturated output-power P where the amplification G of the whole amplifiers is reduced

    to half of the small-signal-gain G : G P G / 2 :

    1G P G / 2 exp g L exp g L2

    =

    = = = ( )

    ( )

    out ,sat out ,sat00

    sat 0 sat

    ln out ,sat0

    0 sat

    0out ,sat sat

    0

    out ,sat satG 1o

    P PG 1 G / 2 1/ exp exp g L / expG P G / 2 P

    PG 2ln2G P

    G ln2P P Output Saturation Power of the amplifiersG 2

    P ln2 P high gain OA>>

    ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞− −=⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟

    ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠−

    ⎯⎯→ =

    = −−

    ⎯⎯⎯⎯→ =

    Saturation of the output power as a function of unsaturated Gain Go and Psat As derived before the implicit eq. for G(Pin) is:

    ( )0 in insat

    G Pln G G PG P

    ⎛ ⎞ ≅ →⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠

    Approximated saturated Gain G as a function of the input power (implicit equation)

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-40

    From numerical simulation of the implicit equation for G:

    G as a function of Pout: Gain-Reduction ΔG=G0-G as a function of Pin: To obtain a high saturated output power Pout,sat of an amplifier, we need a high local saturation power Psat. Pout,sat is almost independent of the small signal gain G0. Remark: We will see that gain saturation is important also in Lasers diodes at the lasing threshold, for amplitude stabilization (nonlinearity) and for the spectral characteristics (see chap.4.4)

    Pout ≈ PS G0/2

    Pout/PSATPin/PSAT

    ~PSAT

    Pout ≈ PS G0/2

    Pout/PSATPin/PSAT

    ~PSAT

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-41

    6.3.2.3 Gain Saturation by Carrier depletion (self-study)

    Homogenous broadening is assumed, so total (distributed in energy) carrier density n is depleted by a single discrete transition.

    In the following we determine the saturation power Psat caused by the reduction of the carrier density n(z)=n(P(z)) < n0 originating from the non-negligible local stimulated emission rate R21,stim(z). We also prove that gain

    saturation can be represented as assumed as ( ) sat1

    1 P z / P+

    (We consider only the static case and not dynamic gain saturation for short optical pulses).

    ( )

    ( )

    21,net ph gr 21,net opt 21,net mod e opt

    opt mode

    21,net opt opt mode

    / t 0 stationary and using the relation g R / s v R / I R A / P

    I intensity P / A

    R g I / g P / A

    ω ω

    ω ω

    ∂ ∂ = = = =

    = =

    → = =

    ( ) optDpump stim spont tr 0mod e spont

    opt

    Rate eq. including stimulated emissionPI nn R R R a n n 0 with n n

    t eLwd A

    we assume that L is so small that P does not change in the active volume:

    multiplication wit

    ω τ∂

    = + − − = + − − − = <∂

    → ( )

    ( )D tr 0mode spont

    D spontDtr 0

    mode mode spont

    h the active volume .... V .... LwdI P Na N N 0 N saturated carrier number ; N unsaturated carrier numbere A

    II P P 1N aN / a Ne A A e

    ω τ

    τω ω τ

    =

    − − − = →

    ⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞= + + < = →⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠

    i i

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-42

    For P=0 we obtain and P=∞ N=Ntr. Insertion of N(P,I) in g(P) leads to:

    0 spontN N I / eτ= =

    ( ) ( ) Dtr tr tr trmode mode spont

    D trtr tr

    mode mode spont mode spont

    D tr

    spont mode

    1 1 I P P 1g a n n a N N a aN / a NV V e A A

    1 I P P N P 1a aN aN / aV e A A A

    1 I N Pa / aV e A

    ω ω τ

    ω ω τ ω τ

    τ

    ⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞= − = − = + + − =⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠

    ⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= + − − +⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠

    ⎛ ⎞= −⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟

    ⎝ ⎠

    ( ) ( )

    0

    D spont sponttr

    spont mode

    spont0 0 o tr

    mode sat sat

    N

    I P1 1 a N / a 1V e A

    a P Pg P g / 1 P g / 1 a n n / 1 qed.A P P

    Reduction of g by reduction of the

    τ τω τ ω

    τω

    ⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞ ⎜ ⎟⎛ ⎞ ⎜ ⎟ ⎛ ⎞

    + = − + =⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟ ⎝ ⎠⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞

    = + = + = − +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠

    carrier density n

    modesat

    spont

    AP Saturation Energya

    ωτ

    → = Saturation Energy is a material parameter

    Amplifiers with high saturation power require:• large mode crossection • short carrier lifetime • small differential gain

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-43

    6.3.4.2 Bandwidth reduction as a function of gain

    Similar to electronic amplifiers, SOAs also decrease their device gain bandwidth ΔΩ with increasing total linear device gain G in comparison to the material gain g bandwidth Δω. ( ) ( )

    ( )

    ( )( )

    ( )

    ( ) ( )

    spont0 0 tr o2 2

    0

    0

    D spontout0 D tr 2 2

    in 0

    spont0

    I1 1g ,n a n n P with nP z eLwd1 /

    spectral total gain G :

    IP 1G ,I exp a n LP eLwd 1 /

    3dB Bandwidth 2 L at amplifier exit:

    IG , I 1G , I exp a2 2 eL

    τω

    ω ω ω

    τω

    ω ω ω

    τω

    ∂≅ − = =

    ∂+ − Δ

    ⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞= = −⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟+ − Δ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠

    − ΔΩ

    ±ΔΩ = =( )

    sponttr tr 2 2

    I 1n L exp a n L solve for wd eLwd 1 /

    τ

    ω

    ⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞− = − → ΔΩ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟+ ΔΩ Δ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠

    ( )( )

    ( ) ( )

    ( )( )

    ( ) ( )

    ( )

    0 0 2 2

    0 0 02 22 2

    2 22 22 2

    0 02 2

    0 0

    1 1exp g L exp g L2 1 /

    1 1 1 1ln g L g L ln ln2 g L 12 21 / 1 /

    /ln2 g L ln2 ln2 / g L /

    1 /

    L ln2 ln2ln2 g L G ln2

    ω

    ω ω

    ωω ω

    ω

    ω

    ⎛ ⎞= ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟+ ΔΩ Δ⎝ ⎠

    ⎛ ⎞+ = → = − = − =⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟+ ΔΩ Δ + ΔΩ Δ⎝ ⎠

    ⎛ ⎞ΔΩ Δ− = − → − − ΔΩ Δ = − ΔΩ Δ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟+ ΔΩ Δ⎝ ⎠

    ΔΩ=

    Δ − + −

    G(ω) g(ω)

    SOA-Gain G(ω)

    Gmax(ω0)

    2ΔΩ

    2Δωmaterial-Gain

    g(ω)

    G(ω) g(ω)

    SOA-Gain G(ω)

    Gmax(ω0)

    2ΔΩ

    2Δωmaterial-Gain

    g(ω)

    SOA-Gain G(ω)

    Gmax(ω0)

    2ΔΩ

    2Δωmaterial-Gain

    g(ω)

    Bandwidth reduction vs. gain G

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-44

    6.3.2.5 Nonidealities of SOAs (self-study)

    Polarization dependence of gain: Because the WG are 1) not symmetric and 2) because the optical matrix elements in Quantum Wells is anisotropic the gain depends on polarisation (gTM, gTE). Undesired because standard optical fibers Do not maintain polarization → gain fluctuations in the SOA.

    Noise Properties of SOAs:

    Noise in SOAs is caused by spontaneous emission PASE, resp. amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) which is superposed to the coherently amplified signal beam Pout=GPin, resp. optical signal mode. Spontaneous emission is optical noise and not directional and can be partially filtered out, except for the part emitted in the spatial angle of the amplified beam. Optical SOAs have much lower noise Figures F~6dB than most electronic high frequency amplifiers. G

    Amplified spontaneous emission

    PASE(z)PASE(L)

    Pout(L) Pin(0)

    PASE(L)

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-45

    SOA with Noise and Signal detection by a PD (optical square law detector)

    Photodiode PD: i~E2 ~Popt

    The optical ASE random field in a bandwidth Δω is mixed in the “square law” detection process of the PD with the signal field and with itself to produce the photocurrent containing “down-mixed” random noise (beat noise) + the intrinsic detection shot-noise:

    As a measure of signal quality we introduce the Signal/Noise Power Ratio S/N, (SNR) after detection in the current i(t) of the PD: Time domain i(t):

    iS(t) =signal-photocurrent, harmonic intensity modulation at ωs

    in(t) = noise-current resulting from mixing in PD:

    1.) Shot-noise of the photodetection , 2.) Interference- or „Beat“-noise of ASE and ASE 3.) interference of signal and ASE

    Frequency domain for i(t) PSD Si(f):

    ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )i s n s shot ASE / Signal ASE / ASESIGNAL NOISE

    S f S f S f S f S f S f S f= + = + + +

    Pin

    Amode

    dVol

    Pout

    i(t)

    in,PD(t) Rauschen

    iph(t)

    APD

    θ Oeffnungswinkel, Mode

    Pspont, mode

    S/N ?

    verstärkteSignalwelle

    verstärkteSpontanemissions-Welle

    i(t)=is(t) + in(t) signal noise

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-46

    Noise Figure F is then defined as usual for the conversion: optical input current output (SOA+PD)

    Definition of SNR of the source: (input-noise) SNR at the SOA output:

    ( ) ( )in S ,in n,inB B

    Def : SNR S f df / S f df= ∫ ∫ ( ) ( )out S ,out n,outB B

    Def : SNR S f df / S f df= ∫ ∫

    The Noise Figure F of the SOA is defined as the ration of the output SNR to the input SNR (after detection by a square-law PD):

    1SNRSNRF

    out

    in ≥=

    Ps,out = G Ps,in Pn,out > Pn,in G + PASE

    ( ) ( )( ) ( )sps,in s,in ASE / Sin outout out,quelle s,in

    2 G 1 n2eRGP B 4GRP RS B 2 G 1SNR N 1 1F .SNR N G G G G2eRP B

    −+ −= = = ≅ <

    It is obvious that the noise figure F is always ≥2 (3dB), because nsp>1. For low F operate the SOA at high G !

    Summary: Optical Amplifiers

    • OA allow a direct optical signal amplification with THz-band width Bopt • OA combined with an optical feedback mechanism are the basic building blocks for LASER-oscillators • Increasing pump current increases the gain G and the noise figure F but decreases the optical bandwidth ΔΩ • SOAs and EDFAs become nonlinear at high output powers resulting in a gain-saturation • The spontaneous emission in OA (and LASERs) is the fundamental source of noise in optical amplification

    Ps,in Ps,out=G Ps,in Signal SOA, G Pn,in Pn,out=G Pn,in + Pn,SOA Noise

    Internal noise

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-47

    6.4 Optical LASER Oscillators and Laser diodes

    LASER (Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation)

    Light waves at ~200 THz can not be amplified by transistor electronics based on free carrier transport because transit frequencies fT are

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-48

    6.4.1 Analogy: electronic and optical oscillators (coherent light wave generator)

    A laser is a generator of almost coherent light waves by stimulated emission.

    It converts for electrically pumped diode laser DC-electrical power from the pump-mechanism into optical AC-power with a frequency of several 100 THz.

    Analogous to electronic oscillator LASERs comprise an optical amplifier (SOA) and a feedback structure (DFB, FP). In contrast to electronic oscillators the LASER contains: - a SOA is a bidirectional amplifier based on quantum-mechanical transitions between excited electron states - a feedback structure providing attenuation and phase shift by distributed optical resonators L>>λ

    Electronic Transmission-line Oscillator: • Non-inverting amplifier, matched at its input to the TL Rin=Z0 • the feed back element is a transmission line resonator:

    L= resonator length γ(ω) =α + jβ = propagation constant of transmission line Γ = γL G(ω)=IGI=Vo/Vin = amplifier gain

    For a self-consistent input – output relation (self-reproducing)

    ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )0 0 1iRoundtrip Gain

    V G V G V Gω ω β ω ω β ω−

    = = → =

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-49

    Multi-Frequency Traveling Wave Oscillators (Ring-Laser): feedback by transmission line

    ( ) ( )

    ( )( ) ( ) ( )

    ( )

    0

    0 2

    2

    1

    2 1 2

    2 1 2

    ph

    L jph

    L

    j L / vj nph

    phres ,n

    with j / j / v ; e and G G e

    Amplitude condition : G e and

    Phase condition : G e e e L / v n ; n , ...

    vOscillation frequencies : n ; n , ... multiple resonances

    L

    γ

    α

    ω π

    γ α π λ α ω β ω ω

    ω

    ω β ω ω π

    πω

    − −

    −− −

    = + = + = =

    =

    = = → = =

    = =

    G(ω) SOA

    Mirror Mirror

    Mirror

    Mirrorsemi-transparent

    opt. Isolator

    L, ΓL, Γ

    Z0

    Vi V0

    Rin=Z0 Rout=0

    ΔΩ

    Iμβ(ω)I

    arg(μβ(ω)) φ

    ω

    ω

    amplifier

    transmission line

    opt. feedback

    μ:

    β:

    −π

    −2π

    ωres,1 ωres,2

    Δωres=2πvph/L

    1

    Multi-Frequency Oscillation are possible !

    (without frequency selective element if the bandwidth ΔΩ of G>>(Δωr))

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-50

    Amplitude stabilization by non-linear gain, gain-saturation of the amplifier:

    • Because the amplifiers are assumed to be linear, the amplitude V0 drops from the oscillation condition and is undefined. • To define the amplitude V0 the oscillator needs a kind of nonlinearity (very often the nonlinear amplifier gain G). • Gain saturation in the SOA of the LASER leads to an amplitude dependent G(V0,ω) resulting in an amplitude condition for V0:

    ( ) ( )L L0 0 0G V e 1 G V e amplitude condition equation for Vα α− = → ≥ → nonlinear Standing Wave Distributed Oscillator: Leads to a very similar oscillation condition, but the field is not a rotating filed but a standing wave as a sum of 2 counter-propagating waves. The configuration represents the standard Fabry-Perot Resonator LASER (exception VCSEL), Reflector Bidirectional Gain Resonator-Transmissionline Reflector R1 Element G R2 Z0, L, Γ

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-51

    Laser Oscillator: (standing wave Fabry-Perot Resonator)

    The Laser consists of: An optical amplifier SOA (eg. a ridge WG DH-Junction) inside a Fabry-Perot (FP) feedback Resonator (with cleaved or etched facets):

    Operation Principle: A stationary optical standing wave between the mirror is possible if the the gain and mirror losses just cancel, resp. the round-trip gain is 1 and the field reproduce itself in amplitude and phase.

    The FP-resonator consists of 2 semi-transparent, parallel mirrors with power reflections R1(2)=r1(2) r1(2)* and transmission T1(2)=1- R1(2) separated by a distance L . We assume propagation losses αWG and bidirectional gain g in the resonator between the mirrors

    E+

    E-

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-52

    For self-consistent field relations at the mirrors z=0 and L using k=2π/λ: (rotating field must reproduce itself after one roundtrip)

    Round-trip gain condition Transmitted left Transmitted right Propagating wave E - Propagating wave E +

    2-2

    0 L zr1 g, αWG r2

    E+(0)

    E-(0)

    r1 r2

    E-(L)

    E+(L)

    0 L zr1 g, αWG r2

    E+(0)

    E-(0)

    r1 r2

    E-(L)

    E+(L)

    ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( )( ) ( ) ( )

    ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( )

    ( ) ( ) ( )

    21 1

    21 2

    2 21 2

    21 2

    0 0

    0

    1 1

    WG

    WG

    WG WG

    WG

    g L/ jk L

    g / jk L

    g / g /jk L jk L

    g j k L

    E r E r E L e e

    re e r E L

    r r e e E e e

    r r e e round trip gain

    α ω

    α ω

    α αω ω

    α ω

    − −+ − −

    − − +

    − −− −+

    − −

    = = =

    = =

    =

    = − =

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-53

    6.4.2 Generic Structures of Diode Lasers

    6.4.2.1 Requirements and basic building blocks of diode lasers:

    The LASER with a Fabry-Perot Resonator (2 parallel semitransparent mirrors (r) separated by the distance (L) represents a standing wave oscillator in the optical domain: • SOA, G(I) • Wave guide FP-resonator with mirror-separation L and opt. propagation constant Γ • Reflection coefficient of the mirrors r1, r2 (field) resp. R1, R2 (power)

    Generic functions:

    PIN-Double-Hetero-diode-structure for efficient Current-Injection of electrons and holes into the thin active layer d

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-54

    x

    y

    L

    w

    d

    current z

    Maximum spatial overlap between waveguide mode and current pumped active layer (large confinement factor Γ∼1, geff=Γg)

    Small contact resistance Rs and low ohmic losses

    Minimal thermal resistance Rth for efficient cooling of the active layer Laser Structures (epitaxial and by etching) realize

    lateral carrier- and optical confinement in many ways:

    Vertical Carrier (optical) Confinement is mainly realized because the bandgap Eg,clad (nclad) of the cladding layers (eg. AlxGa1-xAs) is larger (smaller) than Eg,active (nactive) of the active layer (eg. GaAs) → crystal composition (eg. Al-content x) Buried Heterostructure Laser Diode as a generic realization of the ideal SC-Diode Laser:

    Vertical Carrier-Confinement

    AlGaAs-GaAs-AlGaAs-HD-structure

    Lateral Carrier-Confinement GaAs-AlGaAs-Diode-Isolation

    Vertical and lateral optical Confinement AlGaAs-embedding of the active GaAs-wave guide The high index GaAs active layer and waveguide core is completely surrounded by low-index AlGaAS Front mirror (cleaved, etched)

  • K6

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Electronics Laboratory: Optoelectronics and Optical Communication 18.02.2009

    6-55

    Examples of different lateral optical and carrier confinement:

    During the past 3 decades many laser diode structures emerged for different material systems and growth techniques:

    ridge waveguide

    rib waveguide

    etched mesa buried DH Double-channel planar buried DH

    Planar buried DH strip buried DH