JWG SOFacts 11.18.2012 v3 Final

7/30/2019 JWG SOFacts 11.18.2012 v3 Final

1/21

1

VIRGINIA:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA

JANICE WOLK GRENADIER

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. CH010654

ILONA ELY FREEDMAN GRENADIER

et al,

And

GRENADIER INVESTEMENT CO., LTD et al,

And

DAVID MARK GRENADIER

Defendant

Statement of Facts For Hearing on September 26, 2012 in the Circuit Court of theCity of Alexandria Filed to perfect Order by Judge Clark on October 12, 2012

approving Plaintiffs Appeal Notice

COMES NOW JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, PLAINTIFF files Statement of Facts from the illegalOrders by Judge Clarkwho had recused himself from hearing Plaintiffs Motions in the past having had received in May of 2012 a letter stating he would be party to legal action against him byPlaintiff, that his actions on September 26, 2012 were with prejudice and that Plaintiff has still not hadher day in court according to Brody v. Connecticut. That the Judges have been ruling on Favoritism

and Cronyism not the Law and the Rules of the Supreme Court.

On September 26, 2012 the following picture shows the Notebook of evidence that was summitedto the Judge and copies to the Defendants attorneys with no Objections by Defendants attorneyswhen asked by Judge Clark. Judge Clark allowed all evidence in the Notebook to be put into therecord


2/21

2

On around October 11, 2012 Plaintiff went to the Clerks in the City of Alexandria office toconfirm Plaintiffs file was in Order. Plaintifffound the Exhibits that the Judge had ordered into recordwhere not in the file. When Plaintiff questioned itJudges Chambers informed the Clerks office afterabout 45 miniutes that Judge Clark was on the bench Plaintiff would need to come back. Plaintiffwent to the 4thfloor to find that was a lie. A clerk from Judges Chamber came down claiming shehad been in court on September 26, 2012 and

1. The Judge never had them on the bench which is unture how would the Judge have them ifthey hadnt been on the bench and he hadnt received them in court?

2. They were never put into evidence - Judge Clark very clearly asked Defendants lawyers ifthey had objections and niether attorney nor defendant whom is a lawyer and was in the courtroom had an issue with them being entered on the record.

3. Then it was Plaintiff could check the transcripts and they would say that they were neverentered into the record ( which means to Plaintiff the transcripts have been tampered with)

4. Prior to leaving the court house Sheriff Kapetanis of the Alexandria Sheriffs office escortedPlaintiff back into the Court house where Plaintiffrequested the notebooks back fromDefendants lawyers if they didnt wish to have them - They both in agreement informedPlaintiff they needed them as they had been entered into the record as evidence. Plaintiffwalked away agreeing with them.

The Clerk from Judges chambers thengave Plaintiff the choice of taking Plaintiffs Exhibitsor they would be destroyed


3/21

3

On October 13, 2012 in the Mail Plaintiff received the following Box which has not beenopened from the Circuit Court of Alexandria

On October 11 2012, Plaintiff wrote a letter to Chief Judge Lisa Kemler requesting a special GrandJury to look into the illegal behavior and irresponsible way the court handled the documentssummited into court The fraud on the court since September 5, 2007. Plaintiff was served inresponse to the request the following Order Plaintiff was served this Order as she walked into theCourt house on or around October 16, 2012


4/21

4


5/21

5


6/21

6

These two examples since September 26, 2012 shows the extremes the Judges are going tokeep the truth from being head since September 5, 2007. That Plaintiffs fundamental right to DueProcess the basic Freedoms that our country stands for. The right to due process without Fraud fromLawyers, Judges, Judicial, Elected officials is a primary component of Freedom. The right to a FairTrial Due Process is the basic Constitution right that has been the source of the light of freedomthat our Country has given the World. This basic Liberty is what our flag stand for and here is wherethe standard of Liberty is set for the rest of the World. This case started out as a Real EstatePartnership where one partner took advantage of another partner that partner defendant Ilonashowed how little integrity she has from how she stole from the Sonia Grenadier Trust - not once buton several occasions, etc. etc. But, it is deeply saddening now to see how harsh the effects ofdeprivation of basic freedoms, deprivation of constitutional rights are to Plaintiffs freedom and basichuman rights are to Plaintiffs freedom,

On Wednesday September 26, 2012 in the City of Alexandria Circuit Court room with Judge Clarkpresiding, Judge Clark did a roll call to see who was there and how long they would take. The docketwas full. When Grenadier v. Grenadier was called Defendants attorneys asked to go last Plaintiff

informed Judge she was ready to go. As has been the situation since September 5, 2007 the Judgefavorite the decision of the Defendants Which from what took place in court by all appearance as inthe past the Defendants and the Judge had planned how he would rule and how he would handle thesituation - through Favoritism and Cronyism and not the Law or the Rules of the Supreme Court.Showing the Basic Freedom of Due Process had no place in his court room. Taking 3 hours ofwait time so defendants could go last in a locked down court room then Judge Clark ruled Plaintiffhas to pay Defendants attorneys for that time. It is stated in the City of Alexandria Bar Magazine howwell the Judges and lawyers work together. From all the pictures in the magazine of them, dining,boating, once or twice a month together - how many lives of Victims are decided at these parties?When you have the Power that these Judges have over our being to have the decisions made atparties or by if you are part of the Old Boy Network is disgusting. Many times Plaintiff said a mistake

was made lets fix it; instead they went to another Party and thought how we can further ruin Plaintiffand hergirls lives.

After all others had been heard and several did go past the 30 minutes with the Judge being patientto litigants. The only litigant Judge Clark was rude to besides Plaintiff was another Pro se litigant.

After everyone had left and Grenadier v. Grenadier was heard the Sheriffs were standing outsidethe Court Room to make sure that no one was allowed in to watch the proceedings.

On the Plaintiff side you had pro se Janice Wolk Grenadier

On the Defendants side you had John Tran for Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman et al, and

Michael Wieser for David Grenadier. (Defendant Ilona attorney was a Bait and switch as Ben DiMuroand Hillary were involved in the Fraud on the Court in the filing with the Supreme Court of Virginia)

Plaintiff started out with asking that Judge Clark recuse himself for the following reasons:

1. Refusing to hear 2 Motions filed by Plaintiff2. The letter delivered in May that Plaintiff planed on naming him in a suit she plans to file

because by all appearance Plaintiff believe him to be in collusion with the other Circuit CourtJudges to rule in Defendants favor. Because she is part of their elite Old Boys Network group.


7/21

7

Plaintiff then discussed the issue of John Tran being disingenuous and not servicing Plaintiff properlyand all the grief from the court Plaintiff received with any type of filing or service.

John Tran took up and to the Judge said he had mailed the filing to Plaintiff. Which as red as heturned Plaintiff believes there is little truth to that?

Michael Weiser had complaints about the names on the Filing - ofnot his client but, John Transclient. Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman.

Plaintiff than told the Judge she had a notebook for him and Defendants lawyers and would like tohave them entered into the court record - Plaintiff handed the Notebook (pictured above) to theSheriff who then handed it to the Judge. The Plaintiff then handed both attorneys each a notebookwith the Exhibits. Judge Clark asked Defendants if they had any objections which both Mr. Weiserand Mr. Tran said no. The documents then were entered into the record.

Plaintiff had planned on starting in the beginning of the Notebook and taking the Judge through

1. Showing how much money was owed to Plaintiff from Defendants and that Plaintiff has aclaim. A right to file the Les Penitence. But, not one Judge nor have Defendants attorneysever denied that Plaintiff had a claim. All Orders only deny Motions without explanations

ruling only on Favoritism.2. Judge Clark made it clear he didnt care about the money he wanted to know about the Fraud.Which Plaintiff went into as follows:

1. Plaintiff to date has never had a Judge with Jurisdiction to hear her case no Judge hasbeen properly appointed

2. That Ilona Grenadier a lawyer when she mislead and lied to the Court on September 5,2007 about being served all the Circuit Court Judges at the time Judge Kloch, JudgeKemler, Judge haddock recused themselves. Not filing the appropriate paper work with theSupreme Court of Virginia - Being disengeonus to Plaintiff on several occasions telling herthe complete opposite of the rule 17.

Plaintiff then went into the following facts with Judge Clark at one point saying he didntunderstand just move on you have used your 15 minutes.

September 5, 2007 - Plaintiff Filed with the Alexandria Circuit Court a Motion for Reinstatement of the Bill of Complaint

of 28 E Bellefonte Ave Partnership. At the time I thought it best for notification to the parties to be served through the

Sheriffs office. The court date for the Motion was on September 12, 2007.

September 12, 2007 - Motions Day Judge Kloch is the judge that hears the case. This resulted in the Motion for Default

against Ilona filed on September 21, 2007. As the Motion for Default goes into more detail Ilona was disingenuous in

court claiming she hadnt been served. But, she couldnt have known of the court date unless she was served. She

admitted in court to Judge Kloch that David Grenadiers attorney; Mr. Michael Weiser was aware of the court date

because she had faxed the information to him. Judge Kloch kept passing it over to give Mr. Weiser the chance to show

up. He then sent a clerk down to the Sheriffs office that came back and according to Judge Kloch said that neither Ilona

nor Mr. Weiser had been served according to the Sheriffs records. I explained to the Judge the only way Ilona could be

there was if she was served. Ilona admitted to having been served and faxing the service to Mr. Weiser. At which point

Judge Kloch dismissed everything to be re-heard. Ilona had not been telling the truth when she said she hadnt been

served. Plaintiff also now finds it very questionable what the clerk was told by the Sheriffs office or what was really said

to Judge Kloch.


8/21

8

After Court Plaintiff went down to the Sheriffs office. They gave Plaintiff a copy of Ilonas service. Mr. Weisers papers

were not in the box, his office is in the same building as the Sheriffsoffices, they couldnt say whether he had been

served or not.

September 21, 2007- JWG filed Motion for Default, and The Motion to Reinstate (just in case) for October 10, 2007. -

September 22, 2007All the Alexandria Judges recuse them from hearing the case. This is the start of them bringing in

Judges that hold Kangaroo Court where the decision is made prior to court. This is the start of the collusion to bring in

Judges to rule in Ilona & Davids side. Ilona would brag about her relationship with the Judges and how they called her

and she would give free legal advice. .

October 17, 2007 Letter from Diane Fiske After informing Plaintiff that the Judges had recuse themselves she would

be finding Judges to hear the case. Judge Frank A. Hoss was available for November 28, 2007 at 10.00 am. At the time

of this letter the Judges were:

1. Judge Donald M. Haddock We learned in the Spring of 2008 he had recused himself from hearing the case.

2. Judge John E. Kloch Ilona had lied to him in court on September 5, 2007 He could have heard the Motion for

Default as he knew the truth But, the truth is not what he was looking for.

3. Judge Lisa Bondareff Kemler Her Father was our pediatrician for our girls, I believe David had gone to Hebrew

School with her, His father and her father were good friends/I had shown her and her husband Real Estate.

December 5, 2007- Judge Thomas A. Fortkort heard Motion. Denied Plaintiffs Motion for Default. The Motion for

Default was due to Ilona Grenadier an attorney, officer of the court lying to Judge Kloch in court. Fraud on the

Court

December 2007 - Question Diane Fiske about a Fair Judge she informs Plaintiff the only way anyone else (Supreme

Court choses Judge) is if they cant find one. Which is incorrect the rule is the complete opposite

in accordance with 17.1-105(B): Learn of June of 2010

If all the judges of any court of record are so situated in respect to any case, civil or criminal, pending in their court as torender it improper, in their opinion, for them to preside at the trial, unless the cause or proceeding is removed, as provided

by law, they shall enter the fact of record and the clerk of the court shall at once certify the same to the Chief Justice of

the Supreme Court, who shall designate a judge of some other court of record or a retired judge of any such court to

preside at the trial of such case.

2008

February 8, 2008 - Letter from Ilona (on her law firm stationary) to Plaintiff, Ilona asserts ownership of 75% of a property

Known as 28 East Bellefonte Ave, Alexandria, VA 22305. Plaintiff also felt threatened by the letter which is full of

misleading and deceitful statements. She then puts it in writing -

February 13, 2008Judge Brown hears Motions * Ilona is not in court Heather Jenquien represented her. Motions to

compel -

February 26, 2008Filed with Clerk of Courts following letter: Because keep in mind all Judges had recuse themselves

and all Motions had to go through Diane Fiske as she needed to find a judge or it had to be on a day they had a visiting

Judge.

The letter asks Ilona for dates to get back to Diane Fiske to file a Motion as no Motions could be filed without everyones

ageing on the date before Diane found a Judge.


9/21

9

February 27, 2008 - Ilona Grenadier filed on February 27, 2008 with the Circuit Court of The City of Alexandria anAnswer to The Amended Bill of Complaint claiming 75% ownership of the property at 28 East Bellefonte Ave.,Alexandria, VA 22305 which is a documented lie. Most of Ilona Grenadiers statements in the Answer to The AmendedBill of Complaint were disingenuous which Plaintiff has supplied documentation to VSB for the purpose of establishing thetruth. The following are the lies Ilona Grenadier Filed with the Circuit Court of Alexandria Fraud on the Court by alawyer

1. 75% ownership2. That plaintiff has provided no proof of actual payment for expenses ~ provided 3 times to defendants

3. Plaintiffs Bankruptcy caused by Bellefonte as Plaintiff in & out ~ Which now Plaintiff realizes she would neverhad been in and out if it wasnt for the manipulation and lie s of Ilona Grenadier

4. 4 times Ilona ~ Defendant, Ilona Ely Grenadier, denies that Plaintiff owns or owned 50%of East Bellefonte.

The document on February 27, 2008 by Ilona Ely Grenadier a lawyer was rattled with Lies - The VSB - The Judges inAlexandria and her good friend - Judge Brown had no problem with that.

This can be backed up with information/documentation from Admission statements from Ilona Grenadier which hadseveral conflicting statements. The amount of money Ilona put into the property can be established by an accountingdone by Ilona. The Accounting shows the 25% down payment that was contributed in the purchase of the BellefonteProperty. The documents that were filed with the Motion for Default in the Circuit Court of Alexandria can be used toverify the amount of ownership Ilona had. Ilona had in her possession the documents which showed her ownership at thetime she filed the pleadings. Those pleadings were disingenuous and misleading when filed with The Circuit Court ofAlexandria.

March 5, 2008File 2nd

Motion for Default to be heard March 12, 2008 for the following reasons: Fraud on the

Court by a Lawyer

1. For all the reasons as stated in Motion for Default Dated September 21, 20072. For all the untruths told in the Answer to Bill of Complaint by defendant and Counterclaim and Cross-Complaint

filed on February 27, 2008.3. For the letters Defendant sent bulling, threatening attached to the February Response to Ilona Ely Grenadier/GIC

Motion to Quash Plaintiffs Amended Complaint / From February 8, 2008.4. For the non-response to letters to try and set a new date for depositions or to set a trial date.

March 5, 2008 Filed Motion to Change Date for: Notice of Deposition and to Set Date for Trial As Defendants would

not respond to any correspondence.

March 11, 2008Plaintiff filesPraecipe - Remove Motions for March 12 no visiting Judges.

1. Clerk of the Court will please remove from the docket on March 12, 2008 Plaintiffs Motion to Compel as there isnta visiting judge available to hear it.

2. This again shows that the Circuit Court Judges had recused themselves. That Plaintiff though out the casevoiced her concern on getting a fair Trial. To the deaf ears of the Circuit Court of Alexandria who took thearrogant view of doing whatever they wanted to do.

April 30, 2008Praecipe re-file to have Motion for Default heard as Diane Fiske has found a date that works for the

Judges of Alexandria to find a Judge of their choice for May 7, 2008

May 7, 2008 Motions heard by Judge Brown Ilona after court informs me after he has ruled in her favor allowing her to

file false papers as an attorney in the Alexandria Circuit Court of law what good friends she and Judge Brown are

and how he called her all the time for legal advice. - Fraud on the court by a Judge using Friendships to Rule in

favor of a lawyer who has on several times committed FRAUD ON THE COURT

May 7, 2008 after Court -


10/21

10

1. Ilona Grenadier again brags about her relationship with the Judges - Which she has in the past & continues to givefree legal advice to Judge Brown.

2. Ilona Grenadier explains to Plaintiff why no one has anything do to with Plaintiffs children are because Plaintiff raisedthem Catholic. In 19 years she has seen the girls once by her choice.

3. That Plaintiff should be grateful to her for the listing on Holland Road.4. That Ilona doesnt believe David Stole the money from the Sonia Grenadiers Trust -which only left Ilona and her law

firm to steal over $95,000.005. Plaintiff introduced herself to Judge Haddock after he speaks with Ilonahe explains to Plaintiff I could never get a

fair trial as they all Love Ilona Iturn to Diane Fiske shocked by the statement and express I cant believe he just saidthat to me.

6. Again Plaintiffasks Diane Fiske about getting Judges that arent friends of Ilonas.

May 13, 2008 Letter from Diane P Fiske that the case would be heard by Judge John J. McGrath. This letter shows

the following Judges in the letter head:

1. Donald M. Haddock2. John E. Kloch (Retired) which means at the time Judge McGrath was chosen Judge Kloch and Judge McGrath

were working together.3. Lisa Bondareff Kemler

June 18, 2008Plaintiff Files:

1. Motion for Default - Defendant Ilona has lied in the Admissions

A. For Ilona lying in court to Judge Kloch on September 12, 2007 - Motion for DefaultB. For Motion for Default filed in February for Lying in the Answer to Bill of Complaint by defendant and Counter

claim and Cross ComplaintC. For lies in AdmissionsD. For the letters Defendant sent Bulling & Threatening Plaintiff if Plaintiff didnt drop suit.

2. Motion for Trial by Jury Due to comments made by Judge Haddock & Ilona Grenadier

A. Judge Haddock telling Plaintiff she could never get a fair trial as they all LOVE IlonaB. Ilona informing Plaintiff all the Judges were friends of hers & she gave them free legal advice when they

called her

July 2, 2008 Motion to be heard July 9, 2008 to include:

1. Motion for Trial by Jury2. Motion to Compel3. Motion for Default

July 9, 2008 Judge Howe Brown rules:

1. Denies motion for Default2. Denies motion for Trial by Jury3. And makes both sides work on responses in the Motion to Compel

Spring of 2008 Diane Fiske again advices Plaintiff the only way anyone else would choose a Judge was if they couldnt

find one then it would go to the Supreme Court and they would then choose the Judge. Which was incorrect? The minute

in September of 2007 when the Judges had recuse themselves is when the Supreme Court should have been choosing

the Judges not the Judges themselves or Diane Fiske should not have been choosing the Judges. The Head Judge -

Judge Haddock was talking and hugging Ilona while I was talk ing with Diane Fiske about Fair Judges that were arms

length. When Ilona left I turned to Judge Haddock and introduced myself which he then went onto inform me Iwouldnt

get a fair trial because they all Loved Ilona . Judge Haddock is the Head Judge at the Alexandria Circuit Court. I then

turned to Diane Fiske in shockand said I cant believe Judge Haddock just told me I would never get a Fair Trial


11/21

11

because they loved Ilona. - That the Circuit Court of Alexandria on several occasions was disingenuous with

Plaintiff - FRAUD ON THE COURT

September 11, 2008Trial with Judge John McGrath as our Judge.

1. The 1st issue I have is how first thing he did that morning was he called Ilona Grenadier and me intoChambers to have a conference to see if this could be settled. The problem I have with this is he said he hadstudied the file for the last 45 minutes and understood there to be an issue in including David in theconference. He also made a comment that the money/settlement shouldnt go directly to me because of

judgments against me which I had none at that time. He then suggested the funds could be disbursedthrough Burke & Herbert Bank towards my daughters education. This was my money, not my daughters.Not that every cent I have doesnt go to them. Now please keep in mind I had been led to believe this was ajudge from Harrisonburg, he had no ties to this area. While this was going on Judge Kloch lingered in the hallway. I had been very specific with the Judges office in Alexandria; I expected to have a fair judge, especiallyafter Ilonas comments about Judge Brown, and other Judges. I still felt if I was able to tell the truth, therewouldnt be an issue.

2. Then Ilona was allowed to bring up a situation which dealt with the theft of money from the Sonia GrenadierTrust that was run out of her law office. First in the Opening Statement, and then with questioning me underoath.

3. Then when it was my time to question David and Ilona, I wasnt allowed to question them or bring The SoniaGrenadier Trust up in any way. Judge McGrath said he wasnt going to allow it brought into his court roomand he really didnt understand it. I asked to explain it to him and he wouldnt hear of it. When I mentionedhow they had brought it up he just went on to say he wasnt allowing it in his court room.

4. David Grenadier lied under oath. Judge McGrath was just move on.

5. He then allowed the attorneys to hammer on me. When Mrs. Grenadier got on the stand I was WARNED onhow I question Mrs. Grenadier and what questions I asked her. I started asking Mrs. Grenadier questions,she broke down crying. I asked for recess to give her a chance to compose herself and was denied.

6. Mr. McGrath then went and had a very friendly lunch with Judge Kloch at Jackson 20 a new restaurant in OldTown. Only for Judge Kloch to be discussing going to work with Judge McGrath and his company JudicialSolutions.

7. He then of course found in favor of Ilona and David which I would not have had a problem with if it had been afair trial with a Judge that had integrity. Judge McGrath was tainted and had discussed this case prior to courwith Judge Kloch, and possible other Judges in the chambers. The order was written prior to closingarguments.

September 22, 2008 - File Motion for Reconsideration With new evidence that had been dropped off at my house - Aletter that David Ellsberg the Settlement attorney for Bellefonte had me write him that showed I was loaning the money toIlona / David / GIC

September 23, 2008

1. Diane Fiske - Question: Protocol (Judge was out of town last week)- She will e-mail / call Judge see if he wants mailed to him or in area to stop by

2. Plaintiff Need to know take to next level3. Andrea 703-624-4557 Commonwealth Attorneys Office Randy Sengel explained to me that Judge McGrath did a lot

of work in the Circuit Court of Alexandria and was well known with the Judges.

September 24, 2008Diane heard from Judge sent him Motion-but he didnt want Exhibits - So basically didnt

even consider the facts of the Motion

September 26, 2008 Friday

1. Diane Fiske - 21 days hopefully something today Judge has everything


12/21

12

2. Diane Afternoon received order from Judge in mail sent on 24th denying and he never looked at Exhibits

confirmed by Diane3. Randy Sengel Commonwealth Attorney tells me the JIRC Commission is where I need to go Randy Sengel

Commonwealths Attorney Informs me that Judge McGrath has done a lot of work in Alexandria Circuit Court

4. Call to Judicial Inquiry & Review Commission Donald Curry informed Plaintiff that Judge McGrath was from theArlington Area and that is how he knew about Burke & Herbert Bank - had done extensive work in AlexandriaCourts.

5. Plaintiff realized that the fact he was from Harrisonburg was mute it was a farce. With this new knowledge Plaintiffrealized the following was true Type of Complaints the commission investigates comes under:

A) Allowing Family, social or other relationships to influence this judgment

B) Engaging in private conversations which may influence judicial actions

C) Failing to disqualify in a proceeding in which impartiality reasonably might beQuestioned, because of his actions under A & B

December 18, 2008 Plaintiff learns from the internet that Judge John Kloch is now working with Judge john McGrath Jr

with a firm called Judicial Solutions PC *In Letter from Judge John Kloch he may have already started at Judicial

Solutions at the time of my trial or it may have been agreed opinion at that time. This made it more of a conflict of interest

Not an arms length situation. If it isnt enough to have the Commonwealths Attorney tell you Judge John McGrath has

done a lot of work in the Alexandria Courts.

2009

February 2009 Washingtonian top 25 Divorce attorneys includes Ilona and is referred to as A tough cookie for casesthat might not be amicable, she can mix it up in a state where the old-boy network is strong

March 2009 Alexandria Bar Thanks Ilona / law firm for their generosity in table sponsors

April 17, 2009 Letter from Ben DiMuro threatening Plaintiff that she was trying to extort money from Ilona

April, 29, 2009 2nd VSB complaint response was FU our lawyers can lie steal or cheat and if they are part of the Old

Boy Network we along with JIRC and the Supreme Court of Virginia are going to protect them.

July 7. 2009 - Ben DiMuro, Davids sisters Robin/Racial, Andrea & Karen e-mail calling Pope a Wanker Best description

of e-mail is full of Bull shit

On or around October 28, 2009 LM for Detective Pak about getting together I had been advised not to meet with him.

I choose to Plaintiff knew I had the truth.

October 29, 2009 Conversation to meet with Detective Pak

October 30, 2009 Meet with Detective Pak and a woman at my home for a few hours. I ask to have it recorded. It is

recorded. Yet when I later asked Detective Pak if there would be charges I was informed it was up to Randy Sengel.

Randy Sengel had personally requested the investigation. There is no insistent report or any record with the Alexandria

Police of such investigation.

2010

June 21, 2010 Letter Ms. Patricia L. Harrington Re- VSB

August 2010 Virginia Attorney Calls Diane Fiskeshe confirms all the Judges in The Alexandria Circuit Court ha d

recuse themselves


13/21

13

July 12, 2010 e-mail to Defendants that Plaintiff was filing Motion for Default to be heard on September 21, 2010 to be

heard on July 28, 2010

July 13, 2010 File Motion

July 26, 2010w/ 4 min left Michael Wieser files he cant be there * Remember Plaintiff in September of 2007 wasadmonished for giving enough time and notice to Defendants. Mr. Wieser knew about this conflict 11 days prior todeciding he wasnt going to be able to show up in court.

July, 2010 Ilona files Oppositionwerent we supposed to be in court on the 28

th

? When did she know that MichaelWiser would be filing with the court the conflict?

August 4, 2010 After being reprimanded by the Circuit Court about contacting everyone being treated rudely now

every time Plaintiff calls the Alexandria Circuit Court file Motion to be heard on August 11, 2010

August 11, 2010 Judge Kloch visiting Judge is 100% Disingenuous

August 11, 2010 Plaintiff is informed The Circuit Court would not take her phone calls or any messages from her

August 12, 2010 Plaintiff receives an e-mail - Judge Kloch Decides to recluse himself works with Judge McGrath

Quote from Judge Klochs letterI believe strongly that the appearance of justice is equally important as justiceitself

On or around August 13, 2010 it was agreed by the Alexandria Circuit Court, Defendants & Plaintiff after Alexandria

Circuit Court giving the Plaintiff much grief scheduled a new hearing for October 13, 2010 at 2pm.

October 6, 2010Plaintiff files Praecipe for Hearing on October 13, 2010 for all Motions that had been filed to be heard

along with a Motion for Sanctions filed on October 6, 2010. The Circuit Court of Alexandrias rules are 7 days prior to a

Motion being heard it is to be filed with the Clerks office and Notice to be delivered to opposing parties.

October 13, 2010 / In the Alexandria Circuit Court

1. Judge Nolan B Dawkins preceding, Michael Weiser Esq was there for David Grenadier Defendant, Hillary J.Collyer, Esq for Ilona Grenadier & GIC, Plaintiff Janice Wolk Grenadier was present pro se. Ilona & David were

not present2. There was no Court Reporter.3. Janice Wolk Grenadier started with her Motion to have her Motion for Default to be reheard as the Judges in the

Circuit Court of Alexandria Virginia in 2007 had recluse themselves from hearing the case. That the AlexandriaCircuit Court had not followed the rules of the Supreme Circuit Court 17.1 -105 (B).

4. The Judges of record in 2007 were Judge John Kloch, Judge Lisa Bondareff Kemler, & Judge Donald M.Haddock.

5. Judge Nolan Dawkins pointed out to Plaintiff she had misstated the Motion as it should have been titled a Motionfor Default Judgment.

6. Plaintiff then went on to focus on the Merits of the Case which included the following Facts: Stressing that theJudge understands a Mistake was made by the Alexandria Circuit Court and this was a chance to make right thatMistake. The following facts & evidence was presented to Judge Nolan Dawkins:

7. On September 12, 2007 that Defendant had been disingenuous in the Alexandria Circuit Court that DefendantIlona Ely Grenadier as a lawyer representing herself and Grenadier Investment as an officer of the Court hadbeen disingenuous in the Alexandria Circuit Court. Ilona Grenadier is the widow to the late Judge AlbertGrenadier of the Alexandria Circuit Court. Judge Albert Grenadier had worked with and had personal relationswith Judge Haddock, Judge Kloch, and a close relationship to the father of Judge Lisa Bondereff Kemler whosefather was the pediatrician to Plaintiffs girls, and had gone to Hebrew school with David Grenadier Defendant.

8. Plaintiff presented to the Judge that the Motion for Default was filed on September 21, 2007 and was not heard tillDecember 5, 2007 by Judge Frank A. Hoss.

9. Plaintiff presented to Judge Dawkins a Letter Dated October 17, 2010 setting the date for November 28, 2007from the Circuit Court of Alexandria written by Diane Fiske Court Administrator. Plaintiff then Presented letterdated November 15, 2007 that the Judge had to reschedule to December 5, 2010. Both letters were written byDiane Fiske court Administrator.


14/21

14

10. Plaintiff then presented letter dated May 13, 2008 that Judge John J. McGrath had been chosen as the Judge forTrial. This letter was also written by Diane Fiske who had informed Plaintiff all Alexandria Circuit Court Judgeshad recluse themselves from hearing any Motions or Trial

11. Plaintiff then addressed the rules of the Alexandria Circuit Court and that Motions are normally heard the 2nd and4thWednesday of the month and the Motions needed to be filed by the 1

st or 3rd Wednesday of the month. Thatmy motion took almost 3 months to be heard.

12. Plaintiff then informed Judge Dawkins how after the Motions would be heard by visiting Judges Defendant IlonaGrenadier an officer of the court would brag about what good friends she was with the Judge and how the Judgeswould call defendant Ilona Grenadier when they had legal questions.

13. Plaintiff would then go to Judges chambers and request Judges that were chosen at arms length. Plaintiffexplained to Judge Dawkins that she was informed that the Alexandria Circuit Court Judges choose the Judgeunless they couldnt find a Judge. The Alexandria Circuit Court choose the Days Motions & Trial to be heard tocoincide with the dates they could find the Judge of their choose.

14. Plaintiff then also presented to Judge Dawkins letter that Judge Kloch had written on August 12, 2010, at whichtime Plaintiff pointed out Judge Kochs statement further I believe strongly that the appearance of justice isequally important as justice itself It was Judge Kloch that defendant had been disingenuous September 12,2007. Which is at that point the Judges had recluse themselves.

15. Judge Dawkins acknowledged having seen the letter prior to court at which time Plaintiff asked Judge Dawkins torecluse himself. Plaintiff felt as a Judge working with Judges who had been disingenuous in this court he couldnot Judge this situation fairly. Judge Dawkins refused to recluse himself saying he wasnt a Circuit Court Judge atthe time this case was heard. On or around August 13, 2010it was agreed by the Alexandria Circuit Court,Defendants & Plaintiff after Alexandria Circuit Court giving the Plaintiff much grief scheduled a new hearing forOctober 13, 2010 at 2pm.

16. Judge Dawkins then went on to reference that Judge John McGrath was from Harrisonburg, Virginia. WhichJudge John McGrath is from Harrisonburg, Virginia?

17. Plaintiff then went on to inform Judge Dawkins that Judge John McGrath now lived in Harrisonburg, but, wasraised in Arlington which she learned from Donald Curry attorney for the JERK committee who as a friend ofJudge John McGrath and refused a complaint to be filed. When complaint was forced on him, rejected it with nofollow up on the facts. That the Commonwealth States Attorney Randy Sangel had informed Plaintiff that JudgeJohn McGrath had done extensive work in The Circuit Court of Alexandria as a Judge. Plaintiff then informedJudge Dawkins what had taken place the day of trail with Judge John McGrath on September 11, 2008:

October 13, 2010 Judge Dawkins Order reads:

1. Denied Motion for Default to be heard by a Judge with Jurisdiction2. Denied Sanctions3. Denied action to Recluse Himself.

October 13, 2010Plaintiff calls Alexandria Circuit Court to set up a date for a Motion to be heard. Plaintiffs is told she

must not just e-mail defendants; she must talk to them as well before date can be set. Plaintiff follows the rules put to her

by the Circuit Court of Alexandria

October 14, 2010Plaintiff is informed The Alexandria Circuit Court will not allow any other Motions on this case to be

filed.

October 14, 2010Plaintiff files with the court Facts of what the Plaintiff has claimed and what the actions were of the

Alexandria Circuit Court to have it on file.

October 19, 2010Plaintiff flies with the court Motion for Reconsideration of Order Dated October 13, 2010 Plaintiff in

researching information for Appeal to the Supreme Court finds the following information that had been filed with the Circuit

Court of Alexandria, which Plaintiff felt proved Plaintiff had not lied in court as Judge Dawkins had accused Plaintiff of

doing.

1. March 11, 2008 Plaintiff Filed a Praecipe in the Alexandria Circuit Court that states the Alexandria CircuitCourt wouldnt hear the Motion on the date first filed because there wasnt a visiting Judge , that the only wayMotions would be heard is if there was a visiting Judge.


15/21

15

2. June 18, 2008 Plaintiff Filed a Motion for Trial by Jury So Plaintiff could get a fair trial, again it was denied.Even though Plaintiff stated in Motion for Trial by Jury the difficulties of filing Motions as it could only be done onthe days of Visiting Judges and referenced Since the start of this the Judges in Alexandria have explained toPlaintiff the difficulties of being able to hear the motions or fairly judge this case

3. June 18, 2008 Motion for Default (Should have been Motion for Default Judgment) At this point defendantshad September 12, 2007 disingenuous in court, Had knowingly filed untruths and false statements in there Bill ofComplaint by defendant and Counterclaim and Cross-complaint filed on February 27, 2008. All the untruths filedin there Admissions that can be backed up with the interrogatories. Defendant Ilona Grenadier is a lawyer, anofficer of the court that should be held to a higher standard than to be allowed to be disingenuous in the

Alexandria Circuit Court.

October 20, 2010 Order by Judge Nolan B. Dawkins

1. Denies Reconsideration Order along this case is dismissed with prejudice and to be placed among the endedcases.

November 4, 2010 Plaintiff delivers to the trial Judge a copy Written Statement of Facts to the Alexandria Circuit CourtChambers.

2011

January 20, 2011 ~ JWG Appeal to Supreme Court ~ Record # 110156

February 2, 2011 - Letter Ben Dimuro Give notice file dismiss of Petition for Appeal

February 3, 2011 - Respondents Joint Motion to Dismiss Petition for Appeal Due to Plaintiff not filing Statement of

Facts - Disingenuous

February 8, 2011 Petitioners Response to Respondents Joint Motion to Dismiss Petition for Appeal on Page 2

Respondents state Petitioners state Petitioner failed to ensure that the record contains either a transcript or a

written statement of facts necessary to permit resolution of appellate issues is fatal to her appeal. Accordingly,

the Petition should be dismissed for Petitioners non-compliance with rule 5:11 Petitioner filed Court

Statement of Facts for October 13, 2010 & October 20, 2010 Order o Made a part of Record in accordance to

Supreme Court Rule 5:11 (c) (1) and (2).

FRUAD ON THE COURT BY LAWYERS MICHAEL WEISER, BEN DIMURO & HILLARY COYLERWHICH IS

WHY THE BAIT AND SWITCH WITH HAVING JOHN TRAN IN COURT ON SEPTEMBER 26, 2012

February 10, 2011 Respondents filed with the Supreme Court - Joint Brief in Opposition to Petition for Appeal

May 4, 2011 Letter from Supreme Court of Virginia to Plaintiff May 24, 2011 Oral Argument

May 24, 2011 Plaintiff Oral Argument in Richmond in front of the Supreme Court of Virginia

June 20, 2011 Supreme Court of Virginia Denies Petition, Ignores the law.

June 27, 2011 Plaintiff Petition for Reconsideration

September 2011 Ilona Grenadier & Ben DiMuro generous donation to the Judge Donald M. Haddock Portrait fund

September 15, 2011 Ilona Grenadier through her law firm throws a party on the Miss Mallory in Alexandria, Virginia, by

all appearance a $100,000 + party.

September 20, 2011 Supreme Court Deny Petition for Reconsideration, once again ignores the law.

November 21, 2011 JWG Learns about the Magistrate can also bring charges - Calls City of Alexandria Magistrate to

learn that he requires a Police Report - JWG then calls Detective Pak to ask for Police Report # he ignores phone calls,

e-mails when Plaintiff gets him on the phone first excuse is Computers are down, next excuse not to give me the number


16/21

16

is he hasnt had time to look it up. When asked where Plaintiff can call to get it he sounds nervous on phone and tells

Plaintiff he will get it for Plaintiff. Plaintiff leaves several messages etc.. To never hear back from Detective Pak.

Plaintiff Calls Records in Alexandria to learn - There is no Police Report # for the Extortion investigation brought on by

Randy Sengel commonwealths attorney which there is a letter from Ben DiMuro April 16, 2009 charging Plaintiff with

acts of Extortion.

January 9, 2012 Letter to The Honorable Cynthia Kinser Chief Justice of the Virginia Supreme Court - Plaintiff did not

send after conversation with Doug Roublin that anyone can write a Judge a letter. The issue is back in the Circuit Court

and must be dealt with in the Circuit Court.

January 18, 2012 Praecipe to be heard on January 25, 2012

January 20, 2012 Letter from Law Clerk Circuit Court of Alexandria that my Motion for Sanctions against Mr. Sengel

would be heard by Judge Potter. Again the Circuit Court of Alexandria does not follow the rules or the laws of the court.

Justice delayed is Justice denied.

February 1, 2012 - Motion filed to demand Ed Semonian Clerk of Court answer simple questions about Grand Jury -

Since Alexandria has shown in the past not to follow the rules of the courts It was reasonable for Plaintiff to ask basic

questions which he refused to answer. Most likely he doesnt know the basic rules.

February 1, 2012 - Parecipe filed on Feb 1 for Motion to be heard on February 8, 2012 by the new Judge - Judge Clarkwho had not recused himself from hearing this case.

February 2, 2012 Letter Circuit Court of Alexandria Motion Sanctions against Ed Semonian to be heard at 9am

February 13, 2012 by Judge Potter.

February 7, 2012 Letter to Circuit Court Judges & Ed Semonian Plaintiff planed on being in court on February 8, 2012

that Judge Clark had not recused himself.

February 8, 2012 Judge Clark in court confirms he has not recused himself from the matter and that it isnt on his docket.

Yet Judge Clark then turns and says yes I am going to hear this even though it is not on my docket.

In the End what we have is -

A Judge that blocked Defendant Ilona from taking the stand after Plaintiff had gone to the time,

money and trouble to have her subpoena and, by all appearance the Judges and Clerk of Court

had not planned for the Sheriff to serve her. It was the diligence of the Plaintiff that got the

Defendant served.

The Defendants attorneys defense was 8. Something the Judge wouldnt explain it when Plaintiff

asked and when Plaintiff looked it up - It is a Rule that you can use to Rule in Favoritism and

Cronyism instead of the Law and the Rules of the Supreme Court.

What Plaintiff proved over and over again - Defendant Ilona a lawyer mislead and lied in court, indocuments filed in the court, Fraud on the Court on several occasions -

That Defendants Lawyers Michael Weiser, Ben DiMuro & Hillary Coiler filed false statements in the

documents filed with the Supreme Court of Virginia on February 3, 2012 that Plaintiff had not filed a

Statement of Facts which was untrue. FRAUD ON THE COURT


17/21

17

That Judges Lawyers, Elected Officials, Government employees, have lied time and time again to

protect one anotherThat the Judicial system in Virginia is about Favoritism and Cronyism not

the Law and the Rules -

That the Plaintiff sited the following in court :

Read the Judicial CannonsCANON 1. - A JUDGE SHALL UPHOLD THE INTEGRITY AND INDEPENDENCE OF THEJUDICIARY.CANON 2. - A JUDGE SHALL AVOID IMPROPRIETY AND THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY

IN ALL OF THE JUDGE'S ACTIVITIES.CANON 3. - A JUDGE SHALL PERFORM THE DUTIES OF JUDICIAL OFFICE IMPARTIALLY AND

DILIGENTLY.CANON 4. - A JUDGE MAY ENGAGE IN EXTRA-JUDICIAL ACTIVITIES DESIGNED TO IMPROVETHE LAW, THE LEGAL SYSTEM, AND THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, AND SHALLCONDUCT ANY SUCH EXTRA-JUDICIAL ACTIVITIES IN A MANNER THAT MINIMIZES THE RISKOF CONFLICT WITH JUDICIAL OBLIGATIONS.CANON 5. - A JUDGE SHALL REFRAIN FROM POLITICAL ACTIVITY INAPROPRIATE TO THE

JUDICIAL OFFICE.CANON 6 - JUDGES PRO TEMPORE, RETIRED JUDGES, SUBSTITUTE JUDGES ANDPERSONS SELECTED FOR JUDGESHIPS ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE CANONS.

As to why Judge Clark should recuse himself.

That Supreme rule 17-1-105 (b) had been ignored and lied about to Plaintiff

If all the judges of any court of record are so situated in respect to any case, civil or criminal,pending in their court as to render it improper, in their opinion, for them to preside at the trial

unless the cause or proceeding is removed, as provided by law, they shall enter the fact ofrecord and the clerk of the court shall at once certify the same to the Chief Justice of theSupreme Court, who shall designate a judge of some other court of record or a retired judge ofany such court to preside at the trial of such case.

Plaintiff reminded Judge Clark of his Oath of Office

I do solemnly swear (or affirm ) that I willsupport the Constitution of the United States, and the

Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge all of the

duties incumbent on me as:

Judge of the Judicial Circuit

According to the best of my ability: (so help me God).

Plaintiff reminded Judge Clark of Due Process

The Constitution states only one command twice. The Fifth Amendment says to the federal

government that no one shall be "deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law."

The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, uses the same eleven words, called the Due

Process Clause, to describe a legal obligation of all states. These words have as their central
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html#amendmenthttp://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.amendmentxiv.htmlhttp://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.amendmentxiv.htmlhttp://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html#amendment


18/21

18

promise an assurance that all levels of American government must operate within the law

("legality") and provide fair procedures. When a government harms a person without following the

exact course of the law, this constitutes a due-process violation, which offends against the rule of

law. If you are denied due process in any way the judge's order is VOID!

- Under the color of the law the appearance of a legal right.

The act of a state officer, regardless of whether or not the act is within the limits of his or herauthority, is considered an act under color of law if the officer purports to be conducting himself orherself in the course of official duties.

Under the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT of 1871 (42 U.S.C.A. Section 1983), color of law is synonymous with StateAction, which is conduct by an officer that bears a sufficiently close nexus to a state so that the actionis treated as though it is by the state.

Justice Delayed is Justice Denied

If a judge doesnt have Jurisdiction to make an order the order is VOID . The issue whether thejudge had authority to do what was done, even if doing so was erroneous or even despicable. If hedoes not have jurisdiction to act he loses judicial Immunity. Stump v. Sparkman 435 US 349, 55 LEd 2d 331, 98 S Ct 1099 (1978)

If a judge participates in a conspiracy the acts which do not have judicial immunity are subject to suitand judgment against the judge

The true test in a judicial proceeding is whether the judge is acting within the jurisdiction. Withabsence of jurisdiction there is no judicial immunity. When a judge presides over a case which he hasno authority to preside the acts are void and he loses judicial immunity.

If appointed judge purports to preside under the original appointment, is an order void if the judge hasno authority or jurisdiction over the new matter.

The three legged stool upon which the judge is standing when the judge engages in the judicial actwhich gives rise to the claim. All three legs of the jurisdictional stool must be present. All must besturdy. If any leg fails, neither the judge, nor the judges judicial immunity defense, can stand.

1. TheCourtmust have subject matter jurisdiction. This element or leg is aboutthe power ofthe court as an institution, not the power of the individual who presides as judge. Subjectmatter jurisdiction allows the act to be done by thecourtin that kind of case.

2. Thecourtmust havejurisdiction over the particular case or matter. Generally this meansthat a case must be pending. That generally requires that a pleading was filed to activate thecourts jurisdiction. This element or leg is also about the power of the court as an institution,not the power of the individual who presides as judge.

3. Thejudgemust have authority to act as the judge. The judge must have jurisdiction overthat court in that particular case. This element is sometimes mentioned in passing. It is
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_lawhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_lawhttp://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Section+1983http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/State+Actionhttp://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/State+Actionhttp://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/State+Actionhttp://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/State+Actionhttp://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Section+1983http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_lawhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law


19/21

19

generally not in doubt. It is required. This element may be loosely stated as, the judge mustbe a judge and the judge must be the judge of the particular court with power over the

particular case.

When only one leg is challenged, a court which examines a different leg has engaged in

judicial malpractice. The consequence of a judge acting without authority or jurisdiction

over a case or court, he loses judicial immunity. He had no authority, He had no power, and

His only duty was to not act.

Treason ~ whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is

engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. V.Will, 449 U. S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct, 471 66 L.Ed.2d

392, 406 (1980); Cohen v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)

When reviewing a pro se pleading, it is prudent to follow the federal practice of liberally construing

the allegations set out in the pleading to determine whether the pleading asserts any valid causes of

actions. See e.g. Harrison v. U. S. Postal Service, 840 F.2d 1149, 1152 (4th Cir. 1988). The factual

allegations should be viewed in the light most favorable to the pleading party Davis v. City ofPortsmouth. 579 F. Supp. 1205, 1209-10 ( E.D. Va. 1983), affd, 742 F.2d 1448 (4th /cur. 1984)

I am not a lawyer since 2007 - I have been fighting for a Trial with a Judge with Jurisdiction - I didnt

graduate from college - A lot of people dont know why I didnt graduate from College - It is because

a year after Ted Bundy had killed a girl from my high school in Tallahassee. I was being stalked by a

local boy in Statesboro Ga. - I reported it to my RA, that this boy made me nervous, I had an

apartment on campus - One Friday night in the middle of the he broke into my apartment and hurt

me he went to jail for 6 years. I was on trial for the way I lived my life just as he was on trial for

what he had done to me. I understand Justice I understand the Old Boy Network A mistake was

made in 2007 the Slippery Sloop of injustice started with a lot of people not knowing the whole truth

about Defendant Ilona and that included Plaintiff. What I have learned about Defendant Ilona and

many have learned is horrid. This is just one of many things Ilona used to control me in helping her

cover her mess with the Theft of the money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust. I am Never Never Never

going to give upI have gone from being a victim of Ilona & Davids to being a victim of yall.

Judge Clark in his Order has taken away all my rights as a citizen in the United States of America by

saying I cannot file anything without his permission. He didnt write it once he wrote it 3 times. The

question is how premeditated was it. He has created a Trustee type situation that he must take into

consideration when reading this and in his decision to sign this or not sign this. But, it should be date

stamped November 20, 2012 showing I had met the requirements to perfect my Appeal to the

Supreme Court of Virginia.

Plaintiff has proven more than once that she has not had a Judge with jurisdiction, that there

has been Fraud on the court by Defendants and their attorneys. It should not be held against


20/21

20

Plaintiff that the Old Boy Network doesnt like her or she is not a part of it. Attached copy of Exhibits

that Plaintiff is assuming is in the Box sent back from the Circuit Court of Virginia that has not been

opened by Plaintiff.

Exhibits 1 -4 Show the Money Ilona owes Plaintiff for this suit and other moneys for the purpose and

reason of Lis Pendens

Exhibit 5 Documents that back up all other Fraud on the Court The information on the Bellefonte

Property The Documents that Ilona filed and lied inthe documents that prove Judges didnt have

jurisdiction, the documents that show Attorneys Motion to Supreme Court that Plaintiff had not filed a

Statement of Facts.

November 20, 2012

Janice Wolk GrenadierPro Se

15 West Spring Street

Alexandria, Virginia [email protected]

Certificate of ServiceDocuments have been delivered to Judges Chambers on November 20, 2012 for Judge Clarks approval as called for inOrders. Copies have been delivered to Defendants lawyers ( all Defendants lawyers have received e-mail copies) -Judge James Clark shall notify all partys that Statement of Facts was delivered with the Rules of the Supreme Court ofVirginia and has been filed to and will have it filed stamped and sent to all parties involved as Trustee to Plaintiffs suit.Ilona Grenadier/ GIC /Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffett & Kiesler PC to Ben Dimuro at DimuroGinsburg, 1101 KingStreet, Suite 610, Alexandria, VA 22314 & David Grenadier to Michael J. Weiser, 510 King St., Suite 416, Alexandria, VA

22314.

November 20, 2012

Janice Wolk Grenadier
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]


21/21

21

JWG SOFacts 11.18.2012 v3 Final

Documents

Transcript of JWG SOFacts 11.18.2012 v3 Final