June 24, 2008

13
The SDRGC Imagery Subcommittee presents The San Diego Sub-Regional Imagery Acquisition Project Status and Next Steps June 24, 2008

description

The SDRGC Imagery Subcommittee presents The San Diego Sub-Regional Imagery Acquisition Project Status and Next Steps. June 24, 2008. Imagery Subcommittee Introductions. Wendy Flynn, City of Encinitas Mettja Kuna, City of San Marcos Karl Von Schlieder, City of Carlsbad Sue Carnevale, SANDAG - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of June 24, 2008

Page 1: June 24, 2008

The SDRGC Imagery Subcommittee presents

The San Diego Sub-Regional Imagery Acquisition ProjectStatus and Next Steps

June 24, 2008

Page 2: June 24, 2008

Imagery Subcommittee Introductions

Wendy Flynn, City of Encinitas

Mettja Kuna, City of San Marcos

Karl Von Schlieder, City of Carlsbad

Sue Carnevale, SANDAG

Grace Chung, SANDAG

Page 3: June 24, 2008

Imagery Subcommittee Assistance

Cheryl Mason, SANDAG Service Bureau

Drew Decker, USGS

Paul Hardwick, SDSURF and SDRGC

Barbara Kent, CALTRANS and SDRGC

Pat Landrum, CALTRANS

Page 4: June 24, 2008

Brief History of Past Sub-Regional Imagery Projects

2001 effort led by San Diego County Water Authority

Methods: Traditional photogrammetry; film-based photography.

Deliverables: 6” orthos, 2 ft. contours.

Administration: Separate contracts.

2004 effort led by Chula Vista

Methods: Traditional photogrammetry; film-based photography.

Deliverables: 6” orthos, 2 ft. contours.

Administration: One joint contract.

2005 effort led by the City of San Diego

Methods: LiDAR; film-based photography.

Deliverables: 3” orthos, 2 ft. contours, LiDAR generated terrain model.

Administration: Separate contracts.

Page 5: June 24, 2008

Project Background and Current Status

Project Specifications and Requirements

Current Caveats and Assumptions

Imagery Subcommittee Efforts To-Date

Page 6: June 24, 2008

Project Specifications

4" digital true-color orthophotos, Delivered in 2000x3000 ft GeoTIFF tiles covering an

agency's selected area of interest, Captured with a digital matrix array camera, With positional accuracy to be sufficient for producing 1“

= 100 ft scale planimetric mapping (ASPRS Class 1

Accuracy Standards for Large Scale Maps), Delivered in CA Stateplane coordinates NAD83, 1993

HARN adjustment, Vertical datum NAVD88, and color-balanced across the entire project area. These are not true orthos and may contain an

acceptable amount of building lean.

Page 7: June 24, 2008

4” resolution true-color digital imagery example

Page 8: June 24, 2008

Project Requirements

A high resolution terrain model covering the entire project area is required for this project.

Agencies who already have an existing high resolution terrain model (e.g. LiDAR) can submit their DTM to the select vendor for use in the project.

Agencies who do not have an existing high resolution terrain model will need to acquire one for their AOI as part of this project in order to rectify the imagery to the required positional accuracy specs.

Page 9: June 24, 2008

Current Terrain Date – Merrick 2005 LIDAR Coverage

Page 10: June 24, 2008

Current Caveats and Assumptions Vendors can merge high resolution DTMs in different formats to

arrive at a uniform surface to produce orthorectified imagery within the required positional accuracy specs.

Vendors can produce “on-the-fly” autocorrelated terrain models in areas where no terrain models exist for image orthorectification, but the process may not meet the required positional accuracy specs or be of sufficient quality to generate 2-foot contours.

Agencies who need terrain data may opt to use the autocorrelated terrain method at a lower cost, or have the selected vendor create a more accurate terrain model for better orthorectification at a higher cost. The latter option would include the terrain data as a deliverable.

Does SD County’s existing control monumentation cover the project area? Is it accurate enough? Will vendor set up panels for ground control? Are these required for digital imagery acquisition?

Page 11: June 24, 2008

Imagery Subcommittee Efforts To-Date

Several meetings conducted.

Agencies contacted to select tiles.

Tile selections map created. Some agencies still need to select their tiles.

First draft of RFP completed.

Matrix developed to understand partner agency needs and possible constraints. Some agencies still need to fill out the matrix.

SANDAG approached to act as Administrative lead.

Page 12: June 24, 2008

Partner Agency Feedback To-Date These Agencies Are IN (e.g. No Constraints at this time): Airport Authority, Carlsbad, Coronado, Encinitas, Imperial Beach, Oceanside,

Poway

These Agencies Have Constraints (DTM, Cost, and/or Admin):

Borrego Water District, Chula Vista, County Water Authority, Escondido, San Marcos, SDG&E, Sweetwater, USFWS, Vallecitos Water District

These Agencies Have Not Yet Completed the Matrix:

Centre City Development, City of San Diego, Del Mar, National City, Navy, Port District, Santee, Solana Beach, Vista, Wild Animal Park

These Agencies Have Decided Not to Participate:

CALTRANS, County of San Diego, El Cajon, La Mesa, Lemon Grove, LWWD, NCTD, OMWD, SANDAG, Valley Center MWD

Page 13: June 24, 2008

Thanks for your time and attention.Thanks for your time and attention.

SDRGC Imagery Subcommittee