Julia Sylva - Continuing Disclosure: Why Issuers Should Be Concerned

17
California Contract Cities Association 31 st Annual Fall Seminar October 2011 Continuing Disclosure: Why issuers should be concerned.

description

 

Transcript of Julia Sylva - Continuing Disclosure: Why Issuers Should Be Concerned

Page 1: Julia Sylva - Continuing Disclosure: Why Issuers Should Be Concerned

California Contract Cities Association 31st Annual Fall Seminar

October 2011 Continuing Disclosure:

Why issuers should be concerned.

Page 2: Julia Sylva - Continuing Disclosure: Why Issuers Should Be Concerned

Tax Exempt Municipal Bonds: $2.4 Trillion Industry

“Full and Fair Disclosure insures the integrity of the

Municipal Securities Market”

Page 3: Julia Sylva - Continuing Disclosure: Why Issuers Should Be Concerned

Securities Act of 1933

Regulates the Sale of Securities Requires Disclosure & Registration—Prior

to Sale Prohibits Fraud Protects Investors Applies to Big Corporate Issuers Municipal Bonds are EXEMPT from

Taxation, Disclosure and Registration

Page 4: Julia Sylva - Continuing Disclosure: Why Issuers Should Be Concerned

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Regulates the Sale and Purchase of Securities Formed and Empowered the SEC—to monitor,

regulate, set policy and enforce securities laws Promulgated Rule 10b-5--no fraud or omission of

material facts in the sale or purchase of securities

Page 5: Julia Sylva - Continuing Disclosure: Why Issuers Should Be Concerned

Amendments to Securities Act of 1933Adopted in 1975

Formed and Empowered the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (“MSRB”)*

TOWER AMENDMENT—no oversight of municipal bonds by SEC or MSRB

MSRB Rules Do Not apply to Issuers—only to Brokers, Dealers and Banks

MSRB Rule G-37-”Pay to Play Rule”

Page 6: Julia Sylva - Continuing Disclosure: Why Issuers Should Be Concerned

San Diego Fiasco—April 2008“SEC Issues Cease and Desist Order” SEC Complaint for intentional violation of Rule 10b-5 Inadequate Disclosure of their $2 Billion underfunded Pension Fund City Officials Sanctioned:

City Manager City Treasurer Auditor Comptroller Deputy City Manager of Finance Assistant Auditor & Comptroller Independent Auditors—direct liability - not aiding and abetting

(“insufficient auditing proficiency”)

Page 7: Julia Sylva - Continuing Disclosure: Why Issuers Should Be Concerned

San Diego - continued SEC: “Municipal officials are responsible for

municipal bond disclosure, they play a key gatekeeper role in protecting investors.”

Remediation Actions: outside auditors and conduct two annual follow-up reviews

Fall Out: lowered credit rating; not able to issue municipal bonds(no current financial statements; have to borrow from private lenders at higher interest rates and costs of SEC investigation: $26 million

Page 8: Julia Sylva - Continuing Disclosure: Why Issuers Should Be Concerned

New Jersey Fiasco – 2010“SEC Issues Cease and Desist Order”

• State was negligent in the preparation of the disclosure documents

• State failed to exercise “reasonable care” in preparing its bond offering documents

• NO Violation of Rule 105-b (requires intent)

Page 9: Julia Sylva - Continuing Disclosure: Why Issuers Should Be Concerned

New Jersey - continued

• SEC: “Bond documents created a “fiscal illusion” that the pension funds wee adequately funded

• Settlement—State agreed not to commit further violations; no fines or penalties; no remedial actions

Page 10: Julia Sylva - Continuing Disclosure: Why Issuers Should Be Concerned

Why Issuers should be concerned…

• Heightened focus by the SEC • Cities are being held more accountable• Must implement sufficient processes for updating disclosure• Must educate public officials, administrators and staff about their

role in disclosure obligations re material facts and developments• Must explain the “overall financial condition” of the issuer• Elected City Officials must adopt and articulate written policy

decisions• Investors must understand the full financial impact—a very difficult

• SEC is raising for issuers…they are now responsible to disclose the unlikely and unknown –very difficult task—practically and politically

Page 11: Julia Sylva - Continuing Disclosure: Why Issuers Should Be Concerned

SEC adopts Rule 15c2-12Adopted 1995• Prior to Issuance of Municipal Bonds, Underwriters are obligated to

prepare, receive, review and disseminate disclosure documents (“OS”)

• Annual Financial Information• Material Events…within a reasonable time…

• Principal and Interest Payment Delinquencies• Unscheduled Draws on debt reserves• Unscheduled Draws on Credit Enhancements• Substitution of Credit or Liquidity Providers• Adverse Tax Opinions• Defeasances• Rating Changes

• Non Payment related defaults• Modifications to Rights of Security Holders• Bond Calls• Release, Substitution or Sale of Security Interest

Page 12: Julia Sylva - Continuing Disclosure: Why Issuers Should Be Concerned

SEC Amendments to Rule 15c2-12Adopted June 2010

• “Timely Notice” Defined—within ten (10)days after occurrence of Event (whether material or not)

• Additional Events• Receipt by notices by the IRS re proposed of final

determinations of taxability or tax status of security…• Tender Offers• Bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership…• Merger, Consolidation, or Acquisition re Issuer…or sale

of substantially all of its assets• Appointment of successor or additional Trustee…

Page 13: Julia Sylva - Continuing Disclosure: Why Issuers Should Be Concerned

Effect of Non Compliance

• U/W must evaluate the likelihood that the issuer will comply with Continuing Disclosure

• U/W may rely on specific issuer certifications as to whether Events have occurred, but NOT as to whether Events are material

• Issuer must remedy disclosure deficiencies—• Otherwise U/W cannot underwrite bonds

Page 14: Julia Sylva - Continuing Disclosure: Why Issuers Should Be Concerned

Tower Amendment Under Attack• Rumblings of repeal , amendment…• Dodd – Frank Wall Street Reform & Consumer Protection Act

(August 2010)• Coordinate with SEC and MSRB for rulemaking and enforcement

actions• More oversight• Continuing Obligation for Education of Municipal Advisors and

Issuers• Bill: U.S. Comptroller to conduct two (2) years study re Disclosure

and Report to U. S. Senate Committee on Banking• Repeal: Would allow the SEC & MSRB to require issuers to comply

with Disclosure…

Page 15: Julia Sylva - Continuing Disclosure: Why Issuers Should Be Concerned

Disclosure Counsel

Continuing Disclosure Agreement• Reporting Requirements

• Annual Report• Events (whether material or not)

• Default Remedy: Writ of Mandate or Specific Performance…not deemed a Default on the bonds

• Indemnity Provisions—for Dissemination Agent, officers, directors, employees and agents…

Disclosure Counsel Opinion—examined originals or certified copies of bond documents…bonds are exempt…not undertaken to determine independently or assume any responsibility for the accuracy of disclosure docs…we have had discussions with Issuer and U/W and no reason to believe information misleading… We offer no guarantee…

Page 16: Julia Sylva - Continuing Disclosure: Why Issuers Should Be Concerned

Lessons Learned• Adopt written disclosure policies and

procedures• Train City Officials, Administrators and

Staff• Focus on the “Big Picture” facing the

issuer• Disclose the good, bad and ugly• Hire skilled professional• Take affirmative steps to avoid what

happened in S.D. and N.J.• When in doubt, disclose

Page 17: Julia Sylva - Continuing Disclosure: Why Issuers Should Be Concerned

LAW OFFICES OF JULIA SYLVA ALC

1100 S. Flower Street, Suite 3300Los Angeles, CA 90015

◊2700 Cherry Avenue

Signal Hill, CA 90755◊

Tel: 562.988.3225Fax: 213.652.1966

www. sylvalawcorp.com

Thank you.