Journal Article Critique

GOOD BADTitle and abstract is brief and simple. Easy to understand the whole research carried out

The abstract and title is not very will related due to lacking of information and justification

Using scientific measurement to carry out the research and make it systematic in data presentation

Standard scientific representation used in this articles is not accurate – unit and scientific naming is not accurate

The source for the substance of interest, propolin in the research is stated which is the Autralia Honeybee

The source is not well justify and confusing reader about the source of the propolin is a type of propolin or the company selling it

Research carried out using two concentration making it easier to present the result of the research obtained

Research conducted is not using wide range of concentration. Hence, the result obtained is not persuasive and convincing enough

The methodology conducted is only using the propolin to study the antimicrobial properties. It is easier to understand and simple data presentation.

The methodology does not have control to compare the effectiveness of the propolin. Thus, the result obtain is barely only about the effect of propolin but reader are not able to make comparison of the result obtained.