Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves
-
Upload
challenge-partners -
Category
Education
-
view
2.063 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves
![Page 1: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Joint Practice Development:how to combine CPD with innovation
Professor David Hargreaves
(Wolfson College, Cambridge)
Challenge Partners 9 July 2013
Part One
![Page 2: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The problem:
knowledge transfer
...from one person to another
...from one situation to another
...from one school to another
...from one country to another
![Page 3: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
SHARING GOOD PRACTICE
JOINT PRACTICE DEVELOPMENT
= haphazard scattering of pre-defined and well-honed practice to possible adopters
= teachers working closely together to improve their practice beyond present quality,all within a far better distribution system
versus
![Page 4: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
What causes many attempts at knowledge transfer to fail?
✤ Too little account it taken of the culture in which the practice is embedded, often quite deeply
✤ The practice has to be learned afresh
✤ It is often not a transfer but a transplant or graft
![Page 5: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Teachers’ learning a new practice...
is slow
requires trial & errer
needs
needs
so no quick fixes!
so a partner/coach/mentor
so opportunity to fail
so a partner/coach/mentor
Is this built into your school’s CPD?
error
feedback
support
![Page 6: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Under what conditions is SGP most likely to work?
✤ When the innovation is easily added to existing practice rather than being a replacement of it
✤ When acceptance of the innovation demands little abandonment of an existing practice
✤ When the introduction of the innovation is supported by mentoring and/or coaching
![Page 7: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
SGP - largely unilateral, rarely interactiveJPD - always interactive, often bilateral
SGP - rarely innovative for both partiesJPD - always innovative for both parties
Sharing Good Practice versus Joint Practice Development
SGP - supposedly runs down from successJPD - builds up from what is not working
![Page 8: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Discontent is the first necessity of progress
I have not failed: I have just found ten thousand ways that won’t work
You must learn to fail intelligently. Failing is one of the greatest arts in the world. One fails forward towards success.
In the words of the great innovator, Thomas Edison:
![Page 9: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The plan for teaching and learning
Monitor and improvise where the plan doesn't work
Personal tinkering
Tinkering with partners
Systematic innovation with partners
Distributed innovation to partner schools
From common practice to full JPD
A self-improving school system?
...for the rest of one's career
on a systematic basis
![Page 10: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Remember...
Being presented with the ‘best practice’ of another teacher or school can easily intimidate and provoke defensiveness
A group of teachers facing up to where they would like to be better practitioners can fire their imagination and empower
![Page 11: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
What can I offer to someone else?
What do I want to learn from someone else?
Establish pairs/trios for common pursuits/interests or for complementary skills/expertise
How do you initiate and then embed JPD?
Build on reciprocity, not deficit
Conduct audits for JPD matching
What can our school offer to a partner school?
What do I want to learn from a partner school?
What aspect of teaching/learning am I not content with?
What aspect of teaching/learning are we not content with?
![Page 12: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
In England, for more than two decades, teachers have been required to participate in five in-service training days per year. The research evidence demonstrates that these are rarely well organised, are seen as of little use by participating teachers, and represent a wasted resource.
Brighouse & Moon, 2013
![Page 13: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
1. Joint professional training day
3. Complementary reciprocal closure
2. Unbundle the day for twilights
Implications for Professional Development Days?
In what ways do you think you need to change how you use CPD or training days?
![Page 14: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
How do you initiate and then embed JPD?
★ Work with the natural grain - build on individual tinkering and gossip
★ Research Lesson Study - Pete Dudleywww.lessonstudy.co.uk www.lessonresearch.net
★ Slide from SGP to JPD - by coaching!
★ Build a culture of everybody learning
![Page 15: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Suggested process for JPD
Select a priority area for development
Select an aspect that is NOT working well
Brainstorm possible repair work
Consult students and recruit to the work
Fail until some breakthrough reached
Challenge to push to further innovation
Transfer through new JPD pods
Create an innovation network
![Page 16: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Joint Practice Development:how to combine CPD with innovation
Professor David Hargreaves
(Wolfson College, Cambridge)
Challenge Partners 9 July 2013
Part Two
![Page 17: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
The nature of innovation
Close to existing practice
Far from existing practice
Minor change Major change
Incremental change
Radical change
![Page 18: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
How do you initiate and then embed JPDat student level?
Students as co-constructors and co-innovatorsfor better learning and teaching?
Have you developed student voice?
Students as Web 2.0 innovators?
Students as digital mentors and coaches?
![Page 19: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Wikipedia
Fanfiction
Web 2.0
User-created content
![Page 20: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Harry Potter (635,353)Twilight (207,939)Lord of the Rings (48,276)Percy Jackson and the Olympians (36,519)Hunger Games (30,081)Maximum Ride (17,274)Warriors (15,230)Phantom of the Opera (10,645)Chronicles of Narnia (10,275)Gossip Girl (9,821)Song of the Lioness (8,111)Outsiders (7,642)Mortal Instruments (6,979)Vampire Academy (6,790)Inheritance Cycle (5,442)Artemis Fowl (5,084)Animorphs (4,984)Fairy Tales (4,707)Gallagher Girls (3,766)Clique (3,651)Vampires (3,623)
![Page 21: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
What will happen when they all have constant access to the internet?
Aged 12-15: 43% have internet access in the bedroom Aged 8-11: 14% have internet access in the bedroom
Cloud computingUniversal handhelds with Net access
tv versus the internet
Aged 4-15 weekly time spent watching TV
15 Hours 37 Minutes - 200717 Hours 34 Minutes - 2011
Aged 5-15 - 91% have home access to the internet
![Page 22: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Increase in computer and video gaming among 8-11s
While 12-15s are using the internet for social networking sites, 8-11s are more likely to use it for gaming, with 51 per cent saying they play games online on a weekly basis, up from 44 per cent in 2010.
8-11s are also spending more time playing on games players/ consoles compared with 2010 (9 hours 48 minutes – an increase of nearly 2 hours).
Taking computer and video games together, seven in ten (68 per cent) 8-11s say they play games almost every day, up from 59 per cent in 2010.
![Page 23: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Computer games Conventional classroom
Activity is usually chosen by learner Activity is rarely chosen by learner
Learner is usually highly active Learner is usually relatively passive
Learner is highly motivated to engage
Collaboration among learners usual
Learner motivation is variable
Increasing level of difficulty sought
Feedback is regular and impersonal
Learner is emotionally involved
Failure is a spur to renewed effort
Competition with others is enjoyable
Collaboration among learners is rare
Increasing level of difficulty avoided
Feedback is irregular and personal
Learner is emotionally uninvolved
Failure is dreaded as demotivating
Competition enjoyed only by winners
Consequential decision making vital Student decision making rarely vital
Can you make classroom activity more like a computer game?
![Page 24: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Students as co-constructors and co-innovatorsfor better learning and teaching?
Would the development of pupil voice, and the use of the new
technologies, and the recruitment of pupils as co-innovators affect how
you establish and sustain JPD groups within your school
and then across partner schools?
![Page 25: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Jean Rudduck et al (eds) School Improvement: what can pupils tell us, Fulton, 1988
Michael Fielding & Sara Bragg, Students as Researchers, Pearson, 2003
John MacBeath et al, Consulting Pupils, Pearson, 2003
![Page 26: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
What is the state of the foundations of JPD in your school/department at present?What steps do you need to take to improve JPD within your school/department?What steps do you need to take to improve JPD across partner schools?Do you know how to re-culture your school so that every teacher sees JPD as a naturalway in which to exercise their profession?
JPD built into a teacher’s DNA?JPD teams for school leaders?
![Page 27: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Evidence-based practice
Evidence-informed practice
Evidence-generating practice
Three possibilities
![Page 28: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
In obstetrics… if a new strategy seemed worth trying, doctors did not wait for research trials to tell them if it was all right. They just went ahead and tried it, then looked to see if results improved. Obstetrics went about improving the same way Toyota and General Electric went about improving on the fly, but always paying attention to the results and trying to better them. And that approach worked. Whether all the adjustments and innovation of the obstetrics package are necessary and beneficial may remain unclear… But the package as a whole has made child delivery demonstrably safer and it has done so despite the increasing age, obesity and consequent health problems of pregnant mothers
Atul Gawande, Better: a surgeon’s note on performance, 2007
![Page 29: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
JPD checklist
1. How many JPD pairs, trios etc now established, and how?
5. How are JPD teams being monitored and evaluated?
6. How do professional training days support JPD teams?
9. How innovative have the JPD teams become?
2. How were JPD topics/themes decided?
4. How were JPD success criteria devised?
8. Is evaluation and challenge an element of JPD work?
10. Are innovation processes and outcomes distributed among partners?
3. Are you building from what is not working/needs to be better?
7. Are pupils contributing to the work of JPD teams?
![Page 30: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Dynamic governments remain porous. Renewal rarely comes from within. One of the optical illusions of government is that those inside of it think of themselves as the drivers of change…Yet most far-reaching ideas and changes come from outside… Governments are more often vehicles than initiators. They play a role in embedding these changes but typically they get involved only at a late stage…
Geoff Mulgan
The smarter governments around the world realise that they need to build innovation into their everyday working: through experimental zones and pilots, competitive funds and rewards for promising ideas. And new ideas need time to evolve - preferably away from the spotlight… Most radical change has to start outside government, usually from the bottom rather than the top.
![Page 31: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Most innovations are not disruptive. Many ofthe most important…are sustaining innovations that take a good product or service and make it better. Clayton Christensen
Failures should not be confused with mistakes. Stefan Thomke
Management practices that work for incremental innovation often deter radical innovation. Wolfgang Grulke
![Page 32: Joint Practice Development (Parts 1 and 2) - Prof. David Hargreaves](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042601/54835e4bb47959140d8b49f8/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
The challenge is not to avoid taking risks,but to get much, much smarter about how to de-risk grand aspirations.
Gary HamelAll processes designed to generate newideas begin with information from users.
Eric von Hippel
Most radical projects were driven byinspired and determined people who often had to swim against a tide of corporateindifference. Richard Leifer