John McCain Communist Mole

8/14/2019 John McCain Communist Mole

1/17

John McCain Communist Mole

The Vietnam War is history. However there are many lies and deceptions stillfloated by America's Marxist media about that war and many say that the war waslost because of the media, just like Iraq is being lost because of the media.It is a fact that the US media has subsequently paid for the sons of high ranking

Vietnamese communists to be educated in places like Harvard and Yale, where nopoor white Americans are allowed to go, but that's another story that will be told.As I studied the way John McCain handled his run for president and his treatmentof his running mate, Sarah Palin, I realized that McCain was not what he claimed tobe, a patriotic war hero. I began to study McCain from the time he was trained at

the Annapolis Naval Academy, which has a reputation of harboring one of the mostleftist officers training faculties in America.Then I studied the information from translated North Vietnamese sources about

captured US officers who broke, and then became allies of North Vietnam andworld communism. Then I heard and read and re-read the transcripts of pro-communist broadcasts made by John McCain numerous times during hisincarceration in North Vietnam. McCain's pro-communist broadcasts went farbeyond the normal submission brought about by brutal communist interrogation. Itis evident that the reds broke and turned him.

A Manchurian Candidate is a POW that is turned by communist captors into acovert agent of world communism. The news media, being Marxist itself, ignoredevidence of McCain's collusion with the enemy thirty years ago. That suppressionof evidence allowed McCain's political career to burgeon.Where would a communist sleeper agent be the most dangerous in politics? The USMarxist democrat party or in the so-called Republican conservative Party? It is notsurprising that McCain took on the personna of a Vietnam War Hero who was aconservative Republican. People fell for that disguise for years.hen when McCain was finally recognized as an influential long-time Republican

Senator, he began to wield his influence in ways that marked him as a Marxist, nota conservative. In Congress he became known as Vietnam's most powerful friend,the enemy of POW families wanting their relatives back from communistincarceration and a supporter of many Marxist causes including completely open USborders.Then when Obama needed a stooge set up as a false candidate who would make


2/17


3/17

1970s after serving in Vietnam--has turned a totally deaf ear to the numerousindividuals and groups who are, correctly or not, convinced that Americans wereand are alive in captivity in Southeast Asia.

What, therefore, motivates a John McCain to attack as a pit bull everyone andanyone who has the opinion that men are still alive in the very same captivity thathe himself once experienced? Mr. McCain disguises his attacks on the POW/MIAby claiming he is on the committee to ask "the tough questions" to grill and beratein order to get to the truth. What motivates the man, who at the same time hasshown a sensitive, almost patronizing approach to U.S. government officials whohave lied to the committee? . . .

Borrowing from the title of a popular movie of some years ago, many activists who

have felt the fangs of this pit bull call him the "Manchurian Candidate." Is that afair accusation to level at Senator McCain, the war hero and the former POW?

In the movie, "The Manchurian Candidate," actor Lawrence Harvey portrayed thecharacter of a former POW and war hero of the Korean War, whose brainwashingby his communist captors resulted in his enemies being able to manipulate hisactions. To trigger him to do their bidding all they had to do was have him playsolitaire with the Queen of Diamonds being the trigger that made him theirs, bodyand soul . . .

SOMETIMES TAKES EXTREMES

While there are some who have over the years taken extreme measures to keepalive the POW/MIA issue, to paint everyone--even some of the most extreme--with a broad brush as being frauds and predators is not just.

As Senator Kerry, once an activist himself, knows, and I am sure understands in hisheart, the activist must be at times an extremist. He must do extreme thingsbecause he is the David taking on the Goliath, or, to put it another way--you can't

fight a tiger with a dish rag.

In the case of Kerry, the anti-war activist, he could not fight the powerful, oftenvengeful government officials with the proverbial dish rag. So, he and his followersdisrupted Senate committee meetings, threw red paint, representing blood, on theCapitol steps, etc.


4/17

In the case of the POW/MIA activists they have chained themselves to the WhiteHouse fence, at times verbally abused government officials--whatever it took topeacefully draw attention to their cause, just as Kerry before them.

Presently, Kerry the senator does not approve of POW/MIA activists andPOW/MIA activists, particularly Vietnam veterans, do not approve of the pro-Hanoi Kerry. And yet there is a common ground with Kerry.

There is none with McCain. He has, simply put, declared his own personal war onPOW/MIA activists, and one must ask why?

Even during the Select Committee hearings, H.

Ross Perot, perhaps at one time, one of themost devout POW/MIA activists of all, was atarget of Senator McCain. And yet, it isdoubtful if another POW in America would haveanything but the deepest respect for Mr.Perot.

When someone suggested during the committeehearings that Mr. Perot's efforts in drawingattention to the plight of the POWs in Vietnam

during the war years which ultimately caused the POWs to receive more humanetreatment from their captors, McCain snidely remarked that he thought it was thebombing of Hanoi that was responsible for their better care.

But after his release by Hanoi in 1973, McCain had nothing but praise for Perot andhis followers who ignited and fanned the flames of POW/MIA activism.

Nor has McCain stopped there. He has also viciously attacked fellow war hero,fellow POW and fellow retired Navy captain, Eugene "Red" McDaniel, as a fraud

and a dishonorable man who preys upon the families of those still unaccounted forfrom the war.

Again, it is a case of McCain attacking the activist. McDaniel has been in theforefront of activism in keeping the POW/MIA issue alive during the years, beforethe Select Committee, when few, particularly much of the press, could have cared


5/17

less.

Today, there is extreme pressure on members of Congress to lift the tradeembargo with Vietnam and to establish diplomatic relations with Hanoi, both

actions are opposed by the POW/MIA activists.

McCain, like his fellow Senator, Mr. Kerry, favors lifting the embargo and bothwere on record as such long before they became associated with the SelectCommittee. In fact, the efforts of both have reflected at times more interest inbettering relations with Vietnam, in consort with greedy U.S. big businessinterests, than resolving the POW/MIA issue by accounting for the missing men; inMcCain's case his FELLOW POWs.

However, before becoming a powerful figure in Congress, McCain the candidate,said: "The regime in Hanoi, politically degenerate even by totalitarian standards,refused to provide or even assist in providing a satisfactory accounting ofAmerican MIAs . . .

EXPLOITATION OF POWS

While the Senate Select Committee in its final days of existence is spending itstime and resources on alleged instances of what it considers to be "fraud," and"predator fund-raising activities," it has and is ignoring an issue which is vital toresolving the POW/MIA riddle, that being the issue of intelligence exploitation ofU.S. prisoners of war by Soviet, Chinese, Cuban and Vietnamese psychologicalwarfare experts.

There has been some debate in the committee as to the extent of Soviet KGB andGRU (Soviet military intelligence) involvement in attempts to "turn" AmericanPOWs, with attempts by the Pentagon, supported always by McCain, to deny thatthe Soviets were involved in any such activity. Nevertheless, there was extensivetestimony that POWs were interrogated and possibly recruited before the Paris

Peace Accords were signed in 1973 ending U.S. military involvement in the war--andafterwards, possibly as late as 1978.

"While we all assume the very best about our servicemen who were held itcaptivity," one POW/MIA activist wrote to Sen. Kerry, "there is a historicalprecedence of Soviet, Chinese and North Korean exploitation of American


6/17

prisoners of war. The success of the communist program in Korea may well havebeen duplicated to a degree in Vietnam."

The communist definitely had a sophisticated system of "turning" U.S. prisoners of

war in Korea and, ironically, the movie, "The Manchurian Candidate," fiction that itmay be, was nota misrepresentation of the creative experiments and attempts bythe communists to "turn" American prisoners of war into agents.

According to some, the FBI has/had a program to monitor the activities ofreturned prisoners of war from Indochina. That FBI investigation is based onhistorical knowledge which concluded that some American POWs had been "turned"into agents of the communist.

"Turning" a prisoner of war is not necessarily the prisoner being convinced or "re-educated" by his captors to change his beliefs or politics. The process can involvethe use of a variety of means, both subtle and brutal, elaborately contrived tomanipulate an otherwise patriotic U.S. prisoner's situation or environment to apoint where he is convinced that he must cooperate with his captors in order toremain alive.

One method which had been used successfully by the KGB for their clandestinepurposes was the use of threats of exposing embarrassing behavior, particularlyany illicit sexual behavior. As a classic example, several years ago, the KGB usedsex and seduction to get the U.S. Marine guards to allow them to infiltrate theU.S. Embassy in Moscow.

Another example, if a subject, in this case a POW, became involved in a homosexualsituation and his captors found out about it, his captors would most certainly makea record of the homosexual behavior. Later an interrogator would use that recordas blackmail to extort intelligence information from anyone involved.

Thus, an otherwise defiant prisoner could be blackmailed into becoming an unwilling

collaborator and agent of his captors. After the first collaboration it is a processof threatening to expose the prisoner to his peers or family back home unless theprisoner further "cooperates" by giving even more information.

Another example, if U.S. prisoner "X," under duress or torture, reveals sensitiveinformation about prisoner "Y," which causes prisoner "Y" to be tortured or


7/17

punished, prisoner "X" certainly doesn't want prisoner "Y" to know he was thesource of that information.

Thus, even more information or collaboration can be extracted from prisoner "X."

What in the beginning would seem a necessary collaboration to save one'sreputation or life, could be used over the long term by experienced interrogatorsto create an extensive dossier of collaborations by the prisoner. Anyone trained inthe interrogation of enemy prisoners knows this.

Nearly all of the POWs have reported that they were threatened with the denialof medical treatment unless they provided their captors with specific information.

BOTH KOREA AND VIETNAM

According to sources, some of the same KGB agentsand their associates, often the latter posing asforeign journalists, were involved in attempting toexploit American POWs for intelligence andpropaganda purposes in both Korea and Vietnam. Tocite as just one example, Australian communistjournalist Wilfred Burchett, well known to AmericanPOWs for this activity in Korea, later appeared inthe same role in Vietnam.

Pentagon files regarding exploitation of U.S.prisoners of war in Indochina are kept secret, except from the hierarchy of theU.S. intelligence community and some high U.S. government officials. It of coursealso remains in the files of the communist exploiters of the POWs.

As it stands, the American people will never know the truth about this exploitationin Vietnam, unless some official body, such as the Senate Select Committee,subpoenas the files from the Pentagon. As an example, the Senate Select

Committee has never followed up on the explosive testimony of former KGB Maj.Gen. Oleg Kalugin, who testified, under oath, that the KGB interrogated U.S. POWsin Vietnam.

Kalugin stated that one of the POWs worked on by the KGB was a "high-rankingnaval officer," who, according to Kalugin, agreed to work with the Soviets upon his


8/17

repatriation to the United States and has frequently appeared on U.S. television.

Whether this is true or not it certainly begs to be investigated and, like it or not,Sen. John McCain fits the description, and his behavior, also like it or not, raises

serious questions. The fact that he is a United States Senator should not be afactor, alas, "The Manchurian Candidate" possibility.

When it comes to matters of national security and the welfare of every man,woman and child in the United States, there should be no sacred cows, and it mustnot be forgotten that Sen. McCain was being considered for higher office, prior tohis numerous appearances on national television defending his involvement in theSavings and Loan scandal.

In November of 1991, when Tracy Usry, the former chief investigator of theMinority Staff of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, testified beforethe Select Committee, he revealed that the Soviets interrogated U.S. prisoners ofwar in Vietnam. Sen. McCain became outraged interrupting Usry several times,arguing that "none of the returned U.S. prisoners of war released by Vietnam wereever interrogated by the Soviets." However, this was simply not true and Sen.McCain knows that from firsthand experience.


9/17

Col. Bui Tin, a former Senior Colonel in the North Vietnamese Army, testified onthe same day, but after Usry, that because of his high position in the Communist

Party during the war, he had the authority to "read all documents and secrettelegrams from the politburo" pertaining to American prisoners of war. He saidthat not only did the Soviets interrogate some American prisoners of war, but thatthey treated the Americans very badly.

Bui Tin, who indicated he favored a normalization of relations between the U.S. andVietnam, also offered the committee his records concerning his personalinterrogations of American POWs.

A WARM HUG FOR THE ENEMY

Sen. McCain stunned onlookers at the hearing when he moved forward to thewitness table and warmly embraced Bui Tin as if he was a long, lost brother.

"Was that hug for Bui Tin, a Vietnamese official responsible for the torture ofsome American prisoners of war, a message 'please don't give them my records?'"one activist questioned at the time.

In any case, many of McCain's fellow Vietnam War POWs were aghast, not tomention former POWs of World War II and Korea, who could, only in someinstances after decades, forgive but never forget the inhumanity of their captors--certainly not to the point of embracing them.

Shortly thereafter, as a direct result of Sen. McCain's lobbying of otherRepublican Senators, Usry, a distinguished Vietnam veteran, and all other membersof the Minority Staff, who had participated in the POW/MIA investigations, wereabruptly fired.

If the Senate Select Committee finds it pertinent to investigate alleged instancesof "fraud" by POW/MIA activists, then certainly, by even the most liberalstandards, the charge of collaboration with the enemy by a "high-ranking naval"officer should be investigated just as seriously as were the charges against MarinePrivate Robert Garwood, the only American POW charged and convicted of thiscrime.


10/17

THE ADMIRAL'S SON

John McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone on August 29, 1936. His father

was Admiral John McCain II, who became commander-in-chief of the Pacific forcesin 1968. Admiral McCain later ordered the bombing of Hanoi while his son was inprison. His grandfather was Admiral John S. McCain, Sr., the famous commander ofaircraft carriers in the Pacific under Admiral William F. Halsey in World War II . ..

On his 23rd mission in Vietnam on Oct. 26, 1967, he was shot down by a surface-to-air missile.

To relate the event, McCain later recalled that he was "flying right over the heartof Hanoi in a dive at about 4,500 feet, when a Russian missile the size of atelephone pole came up--the sky was full of them--and blew the right wing off mySkyhawk dive bomber. It went into an inverted, almost straight-down spin.

"I pulled the ejection handle, and was knocked unconscious by the force of of theejection--the air speed was about 500 knots. I didn't realize it at the moment, butI had broken my right leg around the knee, my right arm in three places and myleft arm. I regained consciousness just before I landed by parachute in a lake rightin the center of Hanoi, one they called the Western Lake. My helmet and myoxygen mask had been blown off. "I hit the water and sank to the bottom . . . I didnot feel any pain at the time, and I was able to rise to the surface. I took a breathof air and started sinking again."After bobbing up and down, he was eventuallypulled from the water by Vietnamese who had swam out to get him.

A mob gathered on shore and McCain was bayoneted in the foot and his shoulderwas smashed with a rifle butt. He was put on a truck and taken to Hanoi's mainprison.

After being periodically slapped around for "three or four days" by his captors whowanted military information from him, which McCain claims he refused to give,providing only his name, rank and serial number, he realized he was in critical shapeand called for an officer. He told the officer, "O.K., I'll give you militaryinformation if you will take me to the hospital."


11/17

Regardless of the reasons, the offer to give "military information" in exchange forbetter treatment was a violation of the military Code of Conduct and CollaborationNo. l.

The doctor, according to McCain, said about taking him to the hospital, "It's toolate."

At that point, McCain knew he was in big trouble. According to informationobtained by the U.S. VETERAN, the flier in desperation invoked the name of hisfamous father, Admiral John S. McCain, Jr., the soon-to-be commander of all U.S.Forces in the Pacific.

And that was a violation of the Code of Conduct and Collaboration No. 2.

McCain admits that because of the Vietnamese having the knowledge of who hisfather was, he thus survived because they rushed him to the hospital. TheVietnamese figured that because POW McCain's father was of such high militaryrank that he was of royalty or the governing circle. Thereafter the communistbragged that they had captured "the crown prince."

Later, the Vietnamese would erect a monument in Hanoi near the site of his landingin the lake, stone figure of a pilot raising his arms skyward in surrender andreferring to their catch McCain, by name, as an "air pirate."

At the hospital his wounds were treated. He readily admits that other U.S.prisoners with similar wounds were left to die, pointing out "There were hardly anyamputees among the prisoners who came back because the North Vietnamese justwould not give medical treatment to someone who was badly injured. They weren'tgoing to waste their time.

"McCain has failed to mention in public what he has confided to another U.S.prisoner privately, that since the Vietnamese felt they had in their hands such a

"special prisoner", a propaganda bonanza, a Soviet surgeon was called in to treathim.

HOW MUCH MORE INFORMATION DID HE GIVE?

McCain has admitted that the Vietnamese repeatedly threatened to withhold much


12/17


13/17

NEW WIFE, NEW LIFE, ENTER McCAIN THE POLITICIAN

Later that year, McCain married Cindy Hensley, whose father, Jim, was an Arizona

"beer baron," owning Hensley and Co., the Anheauser-Busch distributor for Phoenixand Tempe, where McCain settled with his new wife after his retirement from theNavy in the spring of 1981.

His new father-in-law made him vice president in charge of public relations forHensley and Co., and soon McCain was writing guest editorials for Arizonanewspapers and thus paving the way for a career in politics. Most of the articleswere of a patriotic nature--"For POWs in Hanoi, Christmas Eve 1971 marked aspiritual turning point," "America--Bastion of liberty, beacon ofhope," "Remember

MIAs fought for valid cause," etc.

It was not long until McCain caught the attention of Sens. Barry Goldwater andPaul Fannin, both Arizona institutions and devout conservative Republicans, menwho could easily be identified with "America--Bastion of liberty, beacon of hope."

Soon, McCain was their choice to succeed veteran Congressman John J. Rhodes, aRepublican representing Arizona's 1st Congressional DIstrict, which convenientlyincluded the city of Tempe.

When McCain was still with the Navy's congressional liaison office it was no secretthat Rhodes, the House minority leader, was getting ready for retirement. Theseat to be vacated in the House was a ripe plum waiting to be picked. The would-beCongressman had long envisioned a career in government service.

And thus began John McCain's first run for elective office. From the beginning thecards were in his favor, even though he was accused of being a carpetbagger sincehe had only recently moved to Arizona . . .

THE COUNTERFEIT HERO

McCain's rising political power in Arizona Republican politics was due in largemeasure to his friendship with Duke Tully, the publisher of the conservative andpowerful ARIZONA REPUBLIC and the PHOENIZ GAZETTE, with a combined dailycirculation of about 400,000.


14/17

Described as "equal parts cowboy, commando, swashbuckler and elegant tycoon" bythe CHICAGO TRIBUNE (Jan. 9, 1986), Tully was, according to the Chicago paper,"a George Patton who drove a Corvette, a Randolph Hearst who flew an F-16, a

John Wayne in aviator glasses and Air Force dress blues."

"I tell Arizona what to think," he stated in public more than once, and it wasparticularly true regarding backing for the efforts of his friend, CongressmanMcCain.

Tully appeared to have a lot in common with his close friend, former Navy combatpilot and war hero John McCain. He boasted of his 100 missions over Vietnam,retiring from the Air Force as a lieutenant-colonel. His service, according to Tully,

also included air combat in Korea, where he once was forced to crash land his P-51Mustang fighter and spent time in a hospital as a result--so he said. His smashedfront teeth were replaced with stainless steel, he also said.

He had, just like his friend John McCain, received the Purple Heart, DistinguishedFlying Cross and the Vietnam Cross of Gallantry.

However, the day after Christmas 1985, it was revealed, according to theCHICAGO TRIBUNE, that John McCain's close friend had "an imagination as big ashis ego."

In fact, the man who even was the godfather to one of McCain's daughters, was atotal fake.

Duke Tully, the man who had arranged to have his newspapers endorse and furtherthe chances of McCain's first run for the House and was already touting him asGoldwater's successor, had "never even went to boot camp."

Nevertheless, the genuine American patriot, Barry Goldwater, almost a national

icon, decided not to run for re-election in 1986 and McCain quickly moved in to fillhis shoes.

According to the NEW YORK TIMES (June 1, 1988), "When John McCain arrived inhere [in Washington] as a freshman Republican Congressman in 1983, one of theissues very much on his mind was how the United States should deal with Vietnam .


15/17

. . He was, he said, dismayed by the Reagan Administration's flat refusal to affordany kind of diplomatic recognition to Hanoi, something he thought could help clearup a number of issues, including the fate of those servicemen still missing in action. . . Mr. McCain, now the junior Senator from Arizona, is leading a legislative effort

to force the Administration to open a lower-level American post in Vietnam, whichcould be preliminary to more formal relations."

SPEAKING OF FRAUD

Otherwise, McCain after his switch to the Senate differed little on any ReaganAdministration policy.

He made few waves until suddenly he found himself on television trying to explain

himself as one of the "Keating 5," five U.S. Senators who became enmeshed in thescandal involving the collapsed Lincoln Savings and Loan and the financialmachinations of now convicted cheat Charles Keating. The U.S. taxpayers will feelfor years the aftershocks of what has become known as the "S & L scandal" andwill be paying off the billions that S & L clients found themselves swindled out ofby Keating and others involved in the massive fraud.

As one of the "Keating 5" Senators, John McCain saw his chances to higher officego down the drain.

Reports from a variety of U.S. publications tell of the involvement of McCain in theever-widening scandal.

ECONOMIST, Mar. 9, 1991--"Mr. McCain, despite his claims of innocense, was theonly one of the five who benefited personally--family holidays in the Bahamas onMr. Keating's tab."

NEW REPUBLIC, Dec. 31, 1990--"The only Republican of the bunch [the fiveSenators], John McCain of Arizona wins credit for finally drawing the line. After

the second of the two April meetings [with Federal regulators] he told Mr. [Sen.Dennis] DeConcini [D-Ariz.] and Mr. Keating that he wouldn't lean on the regulatorsany more. Mr. Keating called him a wimp. But before the rupture, Mr. McCain andhis family were regular guests of Mr. Keating's on trips to the Bahamas. Mr.McCain reimbursed the owner of Lincoln Savings and Loan for only a small fractionof the cost of these holidays. Yet, he never reported the vacations on Senate


16/17


17/17

American people on Jan. 5, 1993, as its plans now stand. If Sens. John McCain andJohn Kerry have their way, as all factors seem to indicate that they will, thereport will trash POW/MIA activists, whose activities the Vietnamese have askedthe senators to curtail.

The report will conclude that U.S. Prisoners of war were left behind but all havesince died and that the Vietnamese are doing all they can to help search for theremains of the dead.

Nevertheless, a report by Senators, each following his own personal agenda, willnot be written in stone and it will not end the dispute.

And the U.S. government will soon lift the trade embargo with Vietnam and

normalize relations.

However, if there are no POWs/MIAs left alive in Southeast Asia then it must beassumed that in one way or another the Vietnamese caused their deaths. Certainly,Sen. John McCain, a former POW, knows the current leaders of Vietnam wereresponsible for murdering many while he was in a Hanoi prison.

Why, Sen. McCain, is there such a rush by you and others to do business with thesame regime, which you, yourself, once called "degenerate" and whose leaders'hands are dripping with the blood of captive, helpless Americans--your fellowPOWs? Have the Vietnamese flipped you a Queen of Diamonds?

John McCain Communist Mole

Documents

Transcript of John McCain Communist Mole