John Kander: Passing Through Curtains - · PDF fileJohn Kander: Passing Through Curtains...
Transcript of John Kander: Passing Through Curtains - · PDF fileJohn Kander: Passing Through Curtains...
John Kander: Passing Through Curtains
Published: May 1, 2010 In conversation with Frank J. Oteri at Kander's home in New York, New York April 7, 2010—10:30 a.m. Transcribed and edited by Frank J. Oteri and John Lydon Video edited by Molly Sheridan
John Kander knew that he wanted to write music for the theatre from his earliest childhood. He wrote his very first song instead of paying attention during his second grade math class and had already completed a musical for his high school. A protégé of Douglas Moore and Jack Beeson, with whom he studied composition at Columbia, Kander eventually found himself accompanying singers, conducting summer stock productions, and playing in the pit orchestra for West Side Story. One thing led to another and he wrote the music for the short-lived 1962 Broadway musical, A Family Affair which Harold Prince directed. As Kander explains:
The theater community is very small. Once you pass through a curtain which lets people look at you as a professional, you can really get to or make contact with just about anybody from one or two degrees of separation.
Later that year, Kander met lyricist Fred Ebb which proved to be the most important encounter of his entire career. Kander and Ebb sustained one of the longest lasting as well as one of the most successful of songwriting collaborations in the history of the American musical theater. Only months after they began writing songs together, Barbara Streisand recorded two of them. And a few years later they landed on Broadway with their score for Flora the Red Menace, about a Depression-era ingénue (Liza Minnelli in her debut) who unwittingly joins the Communist Party. But it was their second Broadway musical together, Cabaret, which solidified their reputation. Against all odds, they transformed Christopher Isherwood's unlikely narrative about sexual awakening amidst the rise of the Nazis in the final years of the Weimar Republic into one of the most popular song and dance extravaganzas of all time. Says Kander:
I can remember when we were writing Cabaret and were talking about the subject, people said "That's really not a good idea." I don't remember reviews very often, but there's one line in the Variety review for Cabaret which I will always remember: "It is unlikely there will be much of an audience for this sort of thing." It all has to do with people's imaginations, what you find theatrical and what you don't.
Kander and Ebb's landmark partnership also yielded such classics of the Broadway canon as Zorba, Chicago (currently on stage at the Ambassador Theatre and the longest-running revival in Broadway history), Woman of the Year, and Kiss of the Spider Woman—all challenging shows which respectively deal with such difficult atypical Broadway topics as revenge killings, corrupt
trials, the private life of a celebrity reporter, and prison torture. In between, they found time to write songs for cabaret acts and motion pictures, the most popular of which remains "New York, New York," which has been performed by everyone from Frank Sinatra to the Three Tenors. But perhaps unsurprisingly, given the vagaries of the Great White Way, not every one of their efforts has been a blockbuster. However, some of the lesser known items in their oeuvre—such as The Rink (a poignant mother-daughter face-off), Steel Pier (about rigged dance marathons in the heyday of Atlantic City), and 70, Girls, 70 (exploring the shenanigans of the residents of a retirement home)—are extremely worth revisiting. Luckily there have been recordings of all of their Broadway output as well as of Go Fly a Kite, an industrial musical they wrote on hire for General Electric.
Kander and Ebb wrote almost all of their music and lyrics together in the same room and their collaborative process was so fruitful that they did not work on projects with anyone else for the duration of their creative partnership, which only ended when Ebb died in 2004. Actually not quite, since Kander has spent the last six years finishing work on four musicals that were left in various stages of development at the time of Ebb's death:
I just channeled Fred as much as I can. I had done a lot of lyric writing before I met Fred and in our collaboration we bounced off into each other's territories freely a lot. When there were new songs to be written for these projects, at first I was nervous about it. Then I got a little more confident. Every once in a while I look up and say, "Where are you, you son of a bitch!" But I've enjoyed doing that; I got to flex my lyricist muscles a lot.
The first of these shows, Curtains, ran over a year on Broadway, while two others—All About Us (based on Thornton Wilder's zanily experimental play, The Skin of Our Teeth) and The Visit (inspired by a macabre Dürrenmatt play)—have been mounted outside of New York City. Their final show, The Scottsboro Boys (about the wrongful, racially-motivated incarceration of nine African American young men in Alabama in the 1930s), just completed a successful off-Broadway run and will be mounted on Broadway next season.
Kander, now in his 80s, once said that he would not work on anything or with anyone else until these four projects were brought to fruition. But now that all four of these shows have been produced, it seemed like a good time to talk with him about his career thus far and what his plans for the future might be. Talking to him was a time portal to a by-gone era when the Broadway musical was central to American popular culture—after all, he is one of the last surviving composers who was around during Broadway's Golden Age. But there was very little time or inclination for nostalgia. Indeed, Kander's determination, creative process, and overall positive outlook make him an excellent role model for composers of all stripes nowadays.
—FJO
Frank J. Oteri: I'm curious about where your interest in writing music for the Broadway theatre began. What was your exposure to musicals growing up in Kansas City?
John Kander: I've always been kind of a musical schizophrenic. Classical music is where I lived mostly, but I was also always interested in popular music, and in theatre music particularly. My brother was, too, and my father. We now loftily call it musical theatre, but in those days musical comedy songs accounted for about fifty percent of the popular songs that the whole country knew. When that changed, I'm not exactly sure, but I grew up in a tradition of listening to a lot of that as well as listening to all the Saturday afternoon broadcasts of the Met. As a matter of fact, when I was in high school I had a picture of Lotte Lehmann as the Marschallin at one end of my bureau and a picture of Gertrude Lawrence at the other end. And I thought if I ever ran away from home, I'd run away to one of these two women, but I wasn't sure which, though not for a second realizing the symbolism of that. I guess that's a long-winded way of saying that I've just always been attracted in both directions.
FJO: So when you first started composing music, what did you compose?
JK: The first thing I wrote was in second grade during arithmetic class. The teacher asked me a question, which of course I couldn't answer. And so she said, "What are you doing?" And I said, "I'm writing a Christmas carol." And so she came to the back of the room where I was sitting and there it was with big notes and all the words about Jesus in the manger and all of that. She made me stay after school and she played it. And they sang it at the Christmas program. This is all faint to me now, but I found out years later that she had called my parents to say, "I just want to let you know that John wrote a Christmas carol; is that all right because I know you're Jewish?" And they said that was O.K. And so that, I suppose, was the beginning of my downfall.
FJO: So does that Christmas carol still survive anywhere?
JK: I hope not.
FJO: It's interesting that for that very first composition you wrote both words and music.
JK: Yeah, I didn't know that there was anything else that you did. I certainly didn't want to do my math exercise. I'm one of those lucky people who always had something I loved to do. I thought that everybody had a passion for something until I got into college and realized that wasn't so and that I was just lucky. Music was in my life from the time I was four years old. It just seemed like a natural part of the world that I lived in. There were no professional musicians in the family, but my dad loved to sing and there were children's concerts that I went to. I got a record player when I was 10, and from then on that was all I wanted, recordings, mostly operas. But I didn't draw much of a line between opera and musical theatre. I was always attracted to the idea of words and music together telling a story. It sounds phony, but it's true. It's just something that I did and didn't think about a lot. I wrote a show for high school and a couple of other local shows, but it was just a part of life. And I assumed that my life would continue in that direction. I didn't feel special and I didn't feel removed from the world around me or my friends.
FJO: Does that first show survive?
JK: I don't know. Songs from it do. I wrote that with a friend of mine in senior class. It was the senior show and it was 1944. We were all going off to war. I remember we had written this sort of anthem called "Carry On" and all the mothers were weeping at the end of it because their sons were going off to be slaughtered in battle. We all came back. I don’t think anybody saw any serious action; I certainly didn't. But when I think back to that big emotional moment, which all of us in our class were playing to the hilt, it makes me smile a little.
FJO: So what did you do right after you got back from the war?
JK: I went to Oberlin, where I graduated in 1951. And then I came to New York, where I went to grad school at Columbia, and I've been here ever since.
FJO: At Columbia I know that one of your mentors was Jack Beeson, who is one of the great American opera composers.
JK: Yes, he and Douglas Moore. I came to New York trying to decide where I wanted to go to grad school. I didn’t particularly want to go to Columbia. I was sort of interested in Yale. But a friend of mine, a girl who had graduated a year before me, was Douglas Moore's assistant, and she thought I ought to go and talk to Douglas. It didn't interest me very much, and it certainly didn't interest him very much. But as a favor to her, he said, "I've got ten minutes before I go to the country." So I had an appointment with him and we talked for almost two hours and became great friends. And I stopped looking. I wanted to go to Columbia and Douglas and I struck up a friendship. Jack Beeson was my first composition teacher. And they became my surrogate family in New York. We always said that Jack was Douglas's legitimate son and I was Douglas's illegitimate son, because of the directions that we went in. But I was then still sort of schizophrenic musically, and Douglas one drunken night said, "You know if I had it to do all over again, I think I'd write for Broadway." And that was the kind of kick in the ass that I needed to help me focus on the direction that I wanted to go.
FJO: When you say schizophrenic, what other kinds of music were you writing?
JK: I was writing some chamber music, a couple of orchestral pieces, and a one-act opera that was my thesis. When I look back on it, it's like every composer I'd ever heard went into my head and stayed there. It was second-rate Stravinsky and second-rate Menotti, maybe not so second-rate but recycled; it didn't have any voice. Much later on, maybe ten or twelve years ago, I started writing art songs where I think maybe I've found a little bit more of a personal voice.
FJO: I'm curious about what happened immediately after this epiphany inspired by Douglas Moore's drunken proclamation. I know that you wound up being a rehearsal pianist for West Side Story.
JK: That's the end of a long story. I had an assistantship in the Opera Workshop at Columbia when I was getting my master's, which essentially meant playing and coaching singers. So I supported myself that way when I got out. Everything sort of leads to something else: I was playing a lot of auditions as well as coaching and that led to me getting a job in summer stock as an assistant conductor. I had studied conducting at Columbia.
So first I conductopiano accshe was ohands heseemed tvery aggryou do wopportun
I was conConversaopened. Ba drink anlittle shorsaw my dI'll order talked anWest Sideconversaso he neebe interethose daythe pit foplaying ifor that yrehearsal
And thenthe auditiwas thereused to mwith me?dance muDouce.
was an assior in stock ancompanimenon tour. Jobslped me a loo be able to ressive sort o
what you do anities present
nducting an ation Piece wBut I was at nd it was likrt man was sdilemma andit for you."
nd he turned e Story. We
ation over theeded a sub ansted. So I says. So for thror West Side n the pit, Ru
you usually cls.
n she went onions. So she e playing pia
me, and at th?" And I saidusic arranger
stant conducnd also tourent to Beatrices came. I fouot during the get a job plaof fellow, buas well as yot themselves
off-Broadwawhen West Sthe party. I w
ke five deep standing in fd said, "WhaSo he got mout to be thekept up an oe year, and hnd he asked id yes. I justree weeks I wStory. And w
uth Mitchell call the piani
n to becomeasked me to
ano for peope end of that
d, "Do you wr for Gypsy,
ctor, then a ed as a two-e Lillie whenund that my
'50s. I alwaaying. I'm nout fortunatelyou can, .
ay show callSide Story was trying toat the bar. T
front of me aat do you wa
me a drink ande pianist for occasional he had to leame if I woul
t said yes a lwas playing while I was who was theist from the o
the stage mo do that andple who camet period, he s
want me to?"and from th
n
ys ot a y if
led
o get This and ant? d we
ave, ld ot in in
e stage manaorchestra to
manager for Gd I said yes. Se in to auditisaid literally" And he saidhat I did the d
A youlegend
ager had to prehearse. So
Gypsy and shSo for weekion for Jerom
y, "Hey, do yd yes, and I dance music
ung John Kandd Beatrice Lill
put in some no I was playi
he needed soks and weeksme Robbins.you want to dsaid yes. So
c for another
der (far right) relie (reading).
new people,ing all those
omebody to ps and weeks . And so he gdo this show I became thshow, Irma
elaxing with st
and e
play I got
w he La
tage
shows yo
JK: I'm tour apartpeople. M
FJO: Foreleased
JK: Therif I had bWest Sidealways thbartender
FJO: Of
JK: Dickworked hbacker's
The originonly historfrom JohnBroadway
ou had previo
trying to thintment on WeMary Rodger
r a flop muson United A
re were wonbeen more age Story, I wohought backr had noticed
f course the n
k Seff was thhard and sawaudition, but
nal cast album irical document Kander's first
y, A Family Affa
ously worke
nk. As I saidest 72nd Strers was there.
ical, A FamiArtists, which
nderful peoplggressive andould never h: If I'd been d me, I'd stil
next big part
he agent for w to it that A t I don't rem
is one of the ts that survivesmusical on
fair (1962).
The theaa curtaincan reallfrom onestory, buapartmenThe threchildrenAffair] thbecause flop, butit, becauwork. Adirected
FJO: Buthrough
ed on?
d, the commueet, nine room. And Sondh
ily Affair didh gave you a
le in it. The td had been a
have had a caa little tallerll be playing
t of the begin
Jim, Bill, anFamily Affa
member meet
s
ater communn which lets ly get to or me or two degut my two clnt at that tim
ee of us had k. And we hahat we tried of some hel
t Hal Prince use we were nd I believe as well.
ut how did yyour connec
unity is veryms for 275 d
heim. I can't
dn't do so baan imprimatu
thing about able to get mareer, becausr or if I'd wav the piano so
nning of this
nd me—Jim'sair happeneding him at th
nity is very speople look
make contactgrees of sepaosest friends
me, were Jamknown each
ad written a mto get on an
lp from peopcame in at thin serious trit was the fi
you get to mections to the
y small. And dollars a monremember th
adly. There's ur. And it's a
all of this—my own drinkse everythingved my armsomewhere, I
s story is you
s plays and Bd. And he muhat time.
small. Once at you as a pt with just ab
aration. It's ss, with whom
mes and Willh other since musical toge
nd did get onple that we kthe last ten drouble and hefirst thing tha
eet Harold Ppeople you
when Jim anth, we just he first time
a cast albuma nice album
—I've always k at the openg stemmed fs a little highI guess.
ur first meeti
Billy's novelust have brou
you pass thrprofessionalbout anybodort of a longm I shared anliam Goldmawe were
ether [A Famn [Broadwayknew. It was days and diree made it almat he ever
Prince, just knew from t
and Bill and Igot to know I met Hal.
m that was m.
said this—isning night offrom that. I'vher and the
ing Fred Ebb
ls. Dick realught Fred to
rough l, you dy g n an.
mily y]
a ected most
the
I had w
s that f ve
b.
lly o the
What I republisherout that Fthis was should malong tog
And so wI began wwe wrotethe samethat way there is to
FJO: Whwrote a stogether Barbara S
JK: Thatdinner wtogether strange. Idessert anpiano andsaid, "I d"I Don't Cnot—somthat you This was
FJO: Yowords at written: a
JK: Rareand write"Meeskitphone, anmoments
Mostly, Itime. I'veimproviswere wriSometim
emember is tr named TomFred was, tooafter A Fam
meet Fred Ebgether." That
we did meet awriting togete a lot. We w
time. It staruntil the endo the story. I
hat's so amazshow togethevery early oStreisand rec
t's true! We which was ver[at that poinI guess we wnd coffee, wd both of us
don't know; ICare Much"
metimes youcan work on
s one of the s
ou mentionedthe same tim
a lyric or a m
ely. But evere out a versete." But I wand so I copies were rare.
I would say ne said this ofe. And we wting a theatr
mes we'd even
that we weremmy Valando. And Tommily Affair—sb; I think yot would have
and we did gther almost i
wrote in the srted off that wd of his life. It started and
zing to me iser you wroten, and they wcord. And le
were very fary unusual [f
nt], but we wwere kind of we would wri
sat on the piI don't care m before coffecan write so
n something songs that ju
d that when me. Did eithemelody line?
ry once in a w. When we w
as in Long Ised it down an
ninety perceften: Fred cowould get a pre piece, whin play the ro
e signed to ado, and it turnmy at one posaid, "I thinkou two woulde been in 196
get along. Frmmediatelysame room away and it stThat's really
d it never en
s that beforee these two swound up on
egend has it t
ast. It was atfor Fred]. I c
were talking aboasting andite a song. Tiano bench.much." And ee which oddomething in for three we
ust sort of cam
you got togeer of you eve
while when were writingsland. And hnd then set i
ent of what would improviphrase or a rhich is mostlyoles until we
a ned oint—k you d get 62.
red and . And
and at tayed y all
nded.
e you ongs n a that one of th
Fred's apartcan't remembabout how fad we said tha
They took us And Fred sahe said, "Pladly enough—fifteen minu
eeks and it came out.
ether with Frer come to a
we were sepg Cabaret, hehe called andt, and we rev
we wrote, wese in rhyme hythm. But b
y what we wecould find t
OntheKa
hem was wr
tment. He haber how lonast we wroteat if they'd cup on the ch
aid, "What'll ay a waltz." —and thoughutes that is rean really be
red Ebb, youa writing ses
parated, Frede had an idea
d had read mvised it whe
e wrote in thand meter inbefore any oere doing, wthe voice of
ne of the longese history of theander and Fred
ritten at a din
ad some frieng we had bee together whclear the tablhallenge, so we write abAnd we wroh this soundeally good inlousy and so
u would creasion with so
d would hava for a song
me a version on we got tog
he same roomn the same wof that happe
we would talkthe person w
st songwriting e American mu
Ebb.
nner party.
nds over foreen working hich was reale between we went to t
bout?" And Iote a song cas like vanityn the same wound labored
ate music anomething alre
ve a lyrical idcalled
of that over tgether. But th
m at the samway that I coened, when wk a lot. who was sing
collaborationsusical theater: J
r
ally
the I alled y, it's way d.
d eady
dea
the hose
e ould we
ging
s in John
or the people who were singing. Then it would evolve into song. Fred was very inventive and would frequently have thoughts that I would not have thought of on my own. But I don't ever remember handing him a melody and saying, "Put a lyric to this." It never worked that way.
He had a little study in his apartment. I went to his house mostly. He lived four blocks from here. I liked to go out for work and he liked to stay home. In that room is where most of the work got done.
FJO: How frequently would you meet?
JK: If we were working on a show, we'd work every day.
FJO: Including weekends?
JK: No. I like to go to the country. The normal pattern was going to Fred's house at about 10 or 10:30 [A.M.] and we went until about 3 [P.M.]. We were very different people in terms of our interests and personalities and friends and maybe even outlook on the world. But when we got in that little studio room of his, we became almost like one person. It was amazing, because that never changed.
FJO: What I find so remarkable about your collaboration is that all those years neither of you ever worked with anyone else.
JK: It just didn't seem like a lot of fun. I did some movie scores. Fred did some special material occasionally. But the idea of doing a project—I don’t know; I think we kinda got spoiled, because of the way we wrote. It's not a way of working that you can export. A lot of people don't work that way and would be very uncomfortable working that way. When Fred and I were working together in the room anything was possible. You didn't have to worry about making a fool of yourself—a bad joke, a really lousy melodic line. We were free in there. And I think that one of the things that made it possible for us to do good work when we did good work was the fact that we allowed ourselves to do bad work and tear it up. We didn't work with a censor over our shoulders. We could try anything.
FJO: Was there ever something that one of you thought was good work and the other thought was bad work?
JK: A final product?
FJO: No, something while you were working.
JK: Yes. But if either of us had a passion for it, the other person would go with it. It was like an unspoken rule.
FJO: One of the strangest projects you were involved with earlier in your collaboration with Fred Ebb was a full-length "industrial" musical commissioned by General Electric for a
conventiobut there
JK: It wafor someyearly thpay themcommon
industrianever com
JK: No, song fromseparate
FJO: BuOut of H
JK: I cantheatre. Orespectab
FJO: Sothe mater
JK: I donarranger those day
FJO: Bulucrative interestin
Joanna LeWife" fromat the 5th EWilliamsb
on of their e were lots of
as a differenproduct. Anings. They w
m handsomelything.
l show, Go Fmmercially r
those were nm this industworld.
ut the songs iHell" and "Ma
n't really remOne is to wrible as long a
when you wrial?
n't even knofor Gypsy an
ys. They got
ut there are qshows like
ng to hear yo
ster sings "Mam General ElecElectric Utility
burg VA, Septe
mployees. I'f them.
nt world thennd the Oldsmwould employ, and writer
Fly a Kite; I released.
never intendtrial show, o
in that show ake a Woma
member it. I'vite what yous you know
wrote music
w. In those dnd Irma La Dlike three th
quite a few shCabaret, Ch
ou describe t
ake a Woman Octric's Go Fly ay Executives Coember 19-21, 1
'm too young
n. An industrmobile showoy a lot of pers the same w
tracked dow
ded for commoh boy, some
are quite goan Out of Yo
ve always thu love. And th
the differenc
for an indus
days I think Douce, the dhousand doll
hows you dihicago, and ithe process a
Out of Your a Kite presenteonference in 966.
g to have eve
rial show wa, for instanceeople from Bway. I think
There wwere veconducThere athose. Yfreedomsome pwere veBroadwmeant ymornin
FJO: Twn a copy of
mercial releaebody else is
ood. "Be Dirour Wife" are
hought there he other is foce.
strial show, d
we were jusdance arranglars and that
d for love anin more receas fun, becau
d
er seen one
as on the mae, and the G
Broadway—tk those are go
was a Generery happy to
cted a coupleare some funYou would hm, but you hpoint. They wery lucrative
way was eagyou had to g
ng, but they p
There's evenf it on eBay a
ase. I never rs going to sin
rect with Mee a hoot.
were two refor money. T
did you have
st for hire. Agers didn't ge
was it.
nd, luckily, fnt years, Kis
use though th
of these indu
gnitude of aGeneral Elect
they would hone now, but
ral Electric so get, because of industrianny stories chave a certaihad to sell thwere sort of e. Every choger to get thoget to work epaid a lot of
n a cast albuma few years a
remember anng it." It was
e" is wonderf
easons to wriThey're both
e to relinquis
And when I wet a percenta
for money ass of the Spidhese shows a
ustrial music
a Broadway stric show wehave stars—t it was a ve
how which wse it paid weal shows, too
connected wiin amount of
he product at fun, and the
orus kid on ose jobs, whiearly in the f money.
m of your ago. But it w
nyone sayings sort of a
ful, and "He
ite for the perfectly
sh your right
was a dance age of anythi
s well, very der Woman.are all fun,
cals,
show ere
—and ry
we ell. I o. ith f t y
ich
was
g, "A
aven
ts to
ing in
It's
remarkabNazism, racial injBroadwathem also
JK: WheIt was forwith peopcollaboragreat joythese lastprocess ito make a
FJO: Buissues?
JK: I donCabaret opened, Hthe next p
And FlorCabaret.were ablework on,think thematerial politicallthese piewe ever sthe Spide"Kiss of And we gwe spokesaid the tit was a gtangentiatheatricalmusicallymovies inof that imwould beworking
bly, their plosensational mustice. Thes
ay fare. But yo be fun.
en I say fun Ir us, and it dple that we ration is a wos of my life.t few years hs fun. The exart in a colla
ut what has a
n't think thatwas broughtHal said, "Wpiece."
ra was not su For the mose to work on so some of thing that atwas its theat
ly about somces are discuset out to doer Woman, Fthe Spider Wgot on the phe to was Hal title and Hal great messagal, it was becl. What couly theatrical tn contrast to
mmediately. e quite an atton they thou
ots are very dmurder trialse are very seyou've found
I was talkingdepends on yreally felt wa
onderful time Fred died in
have had a wxcitement of
aborative wa
attracted you
t we ever stat to us; that w
Whatever hap
uccessful, bust part, fromn the pieces wthe things cattracted us totricality. We
mething—aboussing—but good deeds
Fred just saidWoman." Anhone and thePrince. Andsaid yes. It
ge for the wocause it was ld be more ththan a story ho the grim atmAnd when ytractive thingught we were
decidedly nos, torture. Yoerious topicsd a way to ge
g about workyour collaborarmly towarde. This last wn 2004, but D
wonderful timf the process
ay with peop
u to create so
arted somethwas Hal [Prippens with F
ut that was m then on we
we wanted toame from uso any piece oe feel stronglout the thingI don't think. With Kiss o
d the title, nd I said yes.e next persond we simply wasn't becau
orld, that waimmediatelyheatrical andhalf of whicmosphere whyou look bacg to set musie just crazy.
ot fun. The suour most recs, and a far cet a message
king. I don't rators, but mds and with
work, the colDavid Thomme. As grim s—and I hople whom you
o many show
hing with theince]. Two w
Flora, we'll m
o s. I of ly gs k of
. n
use s
y d h takes plachere he's liv
ck on it, it's qically. But w
RehearsHarold Dishy, J
ubject mattecent show, Tcry from whae across in al
know how tmost of the ti
whom we collaboration o
mpson and Suas that piece
pe I'm not sou respect an
ws that deal w
e idea that wweeks beforemeet the next
e in someboing? All thre
quite clear thwhenever we
sing Flora the Prince, GeorgeJohn Kander (s
er is so dark:The Scottsborat might be cll of these sh
to explain it:ime our collaould be free
on Scottsborousan Stromae is, and inte
ounding too ld/or love is p
with grim, so
e were sendie Flora, the Rt day and sta
ody's mind suee of us sawhat Kiss of the told anybod
Red Menace (e Abbott, Liza seated at piano
the rise of ro Boys, is aconsidered fuhows and hav
: working is aborations w. And a goodo, was one o
an and I overentionally solofty—of trypretty good.
ocial charged
ing a messagRed Menaceart to work o
ummoning uw the possibilhe Spider Wody what we w
1965), left to rMinnelli, Bob
o), Fred Ebb
about fun ve
fun. were d of the r o, the ying
d
ge. e on
up lities oman were
right: b
I can rem"That's re
because iinterestin
FJO: Ofare lots o
JK: Oh, almost caexperiencis to dimBut it waand that i
From KanCabaret (1Club.
member wheneally not a g
it's really allng.
f all your shoof underpinn
no! That's name as an afces I've had inish all thes
as like Spideis the atmosp
der and Ebb's m1966): Joel Gre
n we were wood idea."
the same. It
ows, the one ings around
not true! Steefterthought. Tin the theatrse other storr Woman, thphere.
most successfuey and compan
writing Caba
t's hard to tak
that seems cit.
el Pier is aboThe thing thre—is the daies until we
he first thing
ul musical, ny at the Kit Ka
ret and were
I don't there's Cabareunlikelthis sorimaginyou do
What iall overto do a boy losthe earlopera b18th ce
ke those stor
closest to bo
out all the peat attracted u
ance marathocould find a
g we were att
at
e talking abo
remember reone line in t
et which I wly there will rt of thing."
nations, whaton't.
s hardest, I tr the place, i
a simple contses girl, boy ly intermezzbuffas that wenturies, are ries and find
oy meets girl
eople in it. Tus to it—andons. What wa hook to motracted to is
out the subje
eviews verythe Variety r
will always rebe much of It all has to t you find th
think, and I sincluding outemporary bgets girl. W
zos operaticawere written
hard. I'm red anything ne
l is Steel Pie
The boy meetd it's one of m
we had to do, ove us througthe thing tha
ect, people sa
y often, but review for emember: "Itan audiencedo with peop
heatrical and
see evidenceur own workoy meets gir
What worked ally, the littlein the 17th alating this ew and
er, although t
ts girl part my favorite which was h
gh the eveninat feels theat
aid
t is e for ple's what
e of it k, is rl, in e and
there
hard, ng. trical,
What's clYear. Thwas mucthat it wait, but we
FJO: I thcharacterhusband,unique.
JK: Thatthat a frein pre-Nadance ma
FJO: Thvery begisaying thpopular mBroadwayou circuPier takereliving mBroadwayours I cthat showkind of m
loser to boy at is a standah more diffias successfule did not do
hink the duetr and the wo, "Grass is A
t was fun, bush color thanazi Germanyarathon, or a
hat raises anoinning of ou
hat once uponmusic was may musicals aumvent that ies place in anmemories. Aay show musan think of t
w is about eldmusic they si
meets girl isard story, ancult to writel and that weour best wor
t you wrote man who ma
Always Green
ut I meant it n somethingy, or on Creta prison in La
other interestur conversatin a time abo
music that camand that is noissue in yournother era. A
A Family Affasic was still pthat takes pladerly peopleing would so
s Woman of nd consequene. I'm very ple got an awark on it.
for the lead arried her exner," is prett
was harder tg which takese [Zorba], oatin America
ting issue. Aon you were
out fifty percme out of o longer the r shows by t
And shows lifair took placpart of mainace completee who live inound like mu
the ntly leased ard for
x-ty
to give s place r at a a.
At the e cent of
case, and it taking them ike The Happce in the presstream popuely in the pre
n a retiremenusic from an
WoStoKa
hasn't been outside of thpy Time andsent, but wh
ular music. Besent is 70, G
nt home, it's pearlier era.
oman of the Yeone, Lauren Baander and other
for decades he here and nd The Rink arhen you wrotBut the only Girls, 70. Hoperfectly na
ear (1981): (lefacall, Ebb, Harr members of t
at this pointnow. Even Sre all about te it the sounlater show oowever sinc
atural that the
ft to right) Peterry Guardino, the original cas
t. But Steel
nd of of e e
er
st.
FJO: Lik
JK: Evenbest and theatre alagain in a
FJO: Buas a compzeitgeist
70, Girls, Kander anthe presenafter only
ke Allegro.
n Me and Julasted longelmost totallyan exotic wa
ut by having poser to evois.
70 (1971), onend Ebb shows tt tense, closed 35 performanc
uliet, which ier are pieces y. The Menoay.
the plotline oke those ear
e of the few o take place inon Broadway
ces.
JK: I hawell as mpeople dsong. If musicalsthe audieall the Jethem, allone whicremove.
When Trthings thwas wrorevival, point it dexactly awere at a
Now thinhave lastwell for contemp
is about the twhich are attti pieces see
situated at arlier styles ra
n
ave a theory musicals. If yduring their oyou look at s that have lience. There erome Kern l of which wch lives as aIt has an atm
raviata was hat went wroong was that they went badeveloped ita popular hita remove fro
nk of the Roted. The onlan audience
porary in the
theatre. So tht some sort oem to be dea
an historical ather than try
about that anyou look at iordinary daythe operas thived, they alare very fewmusicals wi
were contempa piece is Shomosphere th
first premierong with it. Bit was in conack one genets reputation t [smiles]. Evom the audie
odgers and Hly ones that re were the one sense of bei
he pieces of of remove. I aling with co
remove, it aying to be pa
nd it has to dit realisticall
y do not suddhat have livell are at somew exceptionsith those wonporary comeow Boat bec
hat is exotic t
red, there wBut one of thntemporary eration or twand, as you ven Gilbert
ence.
Hammersteinreally didn't nes which wing ordinary
f ours which just think it
ontemporary
also gives yoart of whatev
do with operly, ordinary denly burst ied and the e remove fros. If you looknderful songedies, the onause it was ato the audien
ere a lot of hose things tcostume. At
wo, at which know, it's nand Sullivan
n musicals wwork all tha
were y life.
seem to wort's true of muy subjects, bu
ou an opportuver we think
ras as
into
om k at gs in ly at a nce.
that t the
not n
which at
rk usical ut
unity k the
we bouncfor these a while I to flex m
FJO: I rewouldn't until all fshows haSo what's
JK: At thwriter nasmall chawhich yogoing to four actoof them awith a fewthrough tupstairs alike doinprojects Isuddenlyreally tinapproachstory wrisomethin
Steel Pier and Ebb shBroadway2004.
ced off into projects, at look up and
my lyricist mu
emember reawork on a n
four of the uad been brous next?
he moment Iamed Greg Pamber piecesou could do iuse just four
ors in all threand did a littw people listhe second oand thinkingg right now?I had been d
y the idea of ny appealed thed this frieniter and we sng—once Sco
(1997) was thehow to be prod
y before Fred E
each other's first I was n
d say, "Wheruscles a lot.
ading somewnew project wnfinished Ka
ught to life; n
I'm working Pierce on soms—three shoin this livingr instrumentee stories. Wtle workshoptening. And
one. I rememg, "What do I?" And I thin
doing with Frdoing sometto me. And snd of mine wstarted. So thottsboro get
e last Kander duced on Ebb's death in
JK: Rigon the auoperas atime of t
FJO: It'were fouwere notAbout Ufor over has beenwill be mwhat youhim over
JK: I jusof lyric w
territories frnervous aboure are you, y
where that yowith someonander and Ebnow they hav
with a younme very, veryort stories—g room. Theys and the sam
We finished onp for ourselv
we're halfwmber standing
I really feel nk because thred were largthing really, so I
who is a shorthat's s itself work
ght. I think thudience. But
are in the stanthe audience
s staggeringur shows thet yet finished
Us have been a year on Br
n having a vemoving to Brur process wr the past six
st channeledwriting beforeely a lot. Wut it. Then I gou son of a b
ou ne bb ve.
ng y
y're me ne
ves way g
he ge,
t
ked The finais comin
hat works ont it is true. Tndard repert
e when they w
g to me that we two of you d. Since then
n produced ouroadway. Anery successfuroadway nex
was for compx years.
d Fred as muore I met FreWhen there wgot a little mbitch!" But I
al Kander and ng to Broadwa
n the writers Try to think otory which towere written
when Fred Ehad been wo
n both The Vut of town and now The
ful run on Ofxt season. I'mpleting these
uch as I can. d and in ourwere new son
more confidenI've enjoyed
Ebb show, Theay next season.
as well as itof how manyook place in n.
Ebb died, theorking on th
Visit and All and Curtains
Scottsboro Bff-Broadwaym curious ab shows with
I had done ar collaborationgs to be wrnt. Every ondoing that;
e Scottsboro B.
t does y the
ere hat
ran Boys
y and bout hout
a lot on ritten nce in I got
Boys,
out—that I'm eager to get back to.
FJO: You mentioned writing art songs. I know that Renée Fleming sang a wonderful song that you had written for her.
JK: We're back to fun again. It's hard to imagine not writing, so it's what I do. It's what I've done since second grade. Someday I'll stop, because I'll die, but I can't ever imagine not feeling or thinking musico-theatrically, and by that I mean songs which have a certain theatricality to them as well.
FJO: So to get back to your observation that if you do what you do as well as you can, things will happen and people will notice—
JK: —I don't know that things will happen. I was very lucky. As a pianist and sometime conductor, I played well and I enjoyed coaching, and some things came from that. If I had had to go knock on doors, I would have starved to death.
FJO: So what would be your advice to people starting out now who want to create the kinds of work that you've done.
JK: It is so much harder. When Fred and I were starting out, Jerry Bock and Sheldon Harnick were already established and Steve Sondheim was just starting and Jerry Herman had just started. We were all allowed to fail. We were part of a generation where there was so much being done that if people thought you were talented the chances are that they would listen to your work and maybe hire you. It's so much more difficult now. Theatre is so expensive to produce.
The only advice I could have for anybody is if you really love something, if your passions are what sustain you through life, then you just have to find some way to survive and to support your passion. I have an actress friend who loves the theatre. She is a great actress. Her name is Debra Monk. And she once told me that she told her agent that if she could have five lines in any movie she'd say yes and earn a living so she could support her habit, which is playing in the theatre where you can often not make any money. You have to find some way, if you're a composer or if theatre is what you love, you have to find some way to support yourself while you're doing it. We had it easy. My generation had it really, really easy. Hal Prince used to produce a musical for $160,000. They all did. And if a show ran for a year it was a success. That's not true anymore. These are different times. And the music business is different. But all I can say is if you love something, don't let go of it.