Job satisfaction

26

Click here to load reader

Transcript of Job satisfaction

Page 1: Job satisfaction

www.humanikaconsulting.com

JOB SATISFACTION

Page 2: Job satisfaction

Job Satisfaction

DefinitionA pleasurable, positive emotional state resultingfrom the appraisal of one’s job or job experience

Page 3: Job satisfaction

Measuring Job Satisfaction

Page 4: Job satisfaction

Measuring Job Satisfaction

Standard Measures• Global measures

Job Diagnostic Survey (JDS: general) Faces

Job Descriptive Index (JDI: Work-in-general)

• Facet Measures Job Descriptive index (JDI: original)

Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) Job Diagnostic Survey (JDS: facet)

Note. Standard measures of job satisfaction generally focuson the cognitive or affective evaluation of a job.

Page 5: Job satisfaction

A General Model ofJob Satisfaction

Antecedents Job Satisfaction ConsequencesSituational CharacteristicsPersonal Characteristics

Person x Situation InteractionOrganizational outcomes

PerformanceAttendanceRetention

Personal OutcomesQuality of work life

Quality of lifeHealth and well-being

Page 6: Job satisfaction
Page 7: Job satisfaction
Page 8: Job satisfaction

Theoretical Perspectives

Page 9: Job satisfaction

1.Situational Perspective Job satisfaction is a reaction to the situation (e.g., Herzberg’s

concept of job enrichment) Job satisfaction is influenced by the reactions of others (e.g.,

Salancik & Pfeffer social information processing theory)2.Person Perspective

Satisfaction is influenced by personal dispostions (e.g., Staw &Ross, 1985; Arvey et al., 1989; Ilies & Judge, 2003)

3.Person-Situation Interaction Perspective Satisfaction is a joint function of the person and the situation (e.g.,Locke’s (1976) value theory; Loftquist & Dawis’s (1969) theory of

work adjustment)

Page 10: Job satisfaction
Page 11: Job satisfaction
Page 12: Job satisfaction
Page 13: Job satisfaction

Job Satisfaction andJob Performance

Page 14: Job satisfaction

Hypothesis“Satisfied workers are productive workers.”

Empirical Evidence Narrative Reviews

Brayfield & Crockett (1955) -- "no appreciablerelationship"

Locke (1976) -- "job satisfaction has no direct effecton productivity"

Page 15: Job satisfaction

Empirical Evidence

Meta-analyses 1.Vroom (1964) -- median r = .14

2. Iaffaldano & Muchinski (1985) -- sample weightedr = .17

3.Podsakoff & Williams (1986) -- corrected r = .214. Judge et al. (2001) – corrected r = .30 (.52 for

complex jobs)

Page 16: Job satisfaction

Discussion QuestionWhy is the correlation between job satisfaction and

performance so weak?

Possible Answers1. Job satisfaction is just one of many

contributing factors – see Theory of PlannedBehaviour to illustrate

Page 17: Job satisfaction
Page 18: Job satisfaction

Discussion QuestionWhy is the correlation between job satisfaction and

performance so weak?

Possible Answers2. Problems with the measurement of job satisfaction• problem predicting specific behaviour from global

attitudes• Differential relevance of various facets of satisfaction

Page 19: Job satisfaction

Discussion QuestionWhy is the correlation between job satisfaction and

performance so weak?

Possible Answers3. Problems with the measurement of job

performance• Organ (1977): satisfaction should be a better measure

of extra-role (OCB) than in-role performance• Bateman & Organ (1981): r = .41 with OCB

Page 20: Job satisfaction

Job Satisfaction and Absenteeism

Page 21: Job satisfaction

HypothesisSatisfied workers will attend more regularly

Empirical Evidence Meta-analyses report correlations between -.15 and -

.25 (e.g., Hackett & Guion, 1985; Scott & Taylor,1985)

Potential Explanations1. Problems with the measurement of absenteeism (e.g.,

voluntary vs. involuntary)2. Satisfaction is one of many factors influencing

attendance (see Steers & Rhodes’ model)

Page 22: Job satisfaction
Page 23: Job satisfaction

Job Satisfaction and Turnover

Page 24: Job satisfaction

HypothesisSatisfied workers should be less likely to leave

Empirical Evidence Meta-analyses report correlations between -.20 and -.30

(e.g., Griffeth et al., 2000; Lee et al., 1999; Tett &Meyer, 1993)

Potential Explanations1. Problems with the measurement of turnover (e.g.,

voluntary vs. involuntary)2. Satisfaction is one of many factors influencing turnover

(see Hom & Griffeth, 1991, model)

Page 25: Job satisfaction
Page 26: Job satisfaction

Summary• Job satisfaction is an attitude that can affect work

behaviour and personal well-being• Job satisfaction can be enhanced by:

Improving work conditions (job, role, relationships,etc.) Selecting those who:

Are predisposed to be satisfied Fit with the job, culture, role, etc.

• Job satisfaction has modest but meaningful effectson performance, attendance, retention etc.

Effects are strongest for “volitional” behaviour (e.g.,OCB, voluntary absence, voluntary turnover)