Job satisfaction
Click here to load reader
-
Upload
seta-wicaksana -
Category
Business
-
view
17.146 -
download
0
Transcript of Job satisfaction
www.humanikaconsulting.com
JOB SATISFACTION
Job Satisfaction
DefinitionA pleasurable, positive emotional state resultingfrom the appraisal of one’s job or job experience
Measuring Job Satisfaction
Measuring Job Satisfaction
Standard Measures• Global measures
Job Diagnostic Survey (JDS: general) Faces
Job Descriptive Index (JDI: Work-in-general)
• Facet Measures Job Descriptive index (JDI: original)
Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) Job Diagnostic Survey (JDS: facet)
Note. Standard measures of job satisfaction generally focuson the cognitive or affective evaluation of a job.
A General Model ofJob Satisfaction
Antecedents Job Satisfaction ConsequencesSituational CharacteristicsPersonal Characteristics
Person x Situation InteractionOrganizational outcomes
PerformanceAttendanceRetention
Personal OutcomesQuality of work life
Quality of lifeHealth and well-being
Theoretical Perspectives
1.Situational Perspective Job satisfaction is a reaction to the situation (e.g., Herzberg’s
concept of job enrichment) Job satisfaction is influenced by the reactions of others (e.g.,
Salancik & Pfeffer social information processing theory)2.Person Perspective
Satisfaction is influenced by personal dispostions (e.g., Staw &Ross, 1985; Arvey et al., 1989; Ilies & Judge, 2003)
3.Person-Situation Interaction Perspective Satisfaction is a joint function of the person and the situation (e.g.,Locke’s (1976) value theory; Loftquist & Dawis’s (1969) theory of
work adjustment)
Job Satisfaction andJob Performance
Hypothesis“Satisfied workers are productive workers.”
Empirical Evidence Narrative Reviews
Brayfield & Crockett (1955) -- "no appreciablerelationship"
Locke (1976) -- "job satisfaction has no direct effecton productivity"
Empirical Evidence
Meta-analyses 1.Vroom (1964) -- median r = .14
2. Iaffaldano & Muchinski (1985) -- sample weightedr = .17
3.Podsakoff & Williams (1986) -- corrected r = .214. Judge et al. (2001) – corrected r = .30 (.52 for
complex jobs)
Discussion QuestionWhy is the correlation between job satisfaction and
performance so weak?
Possible Answers1. Job satisfaction is just one of many
contributing factors – see Theory of PlannedBehaviour to illustrate
Discussion QuestionWhy is the correlation between job satisfaction and
performance so weak?
Possible Answers2. Problems with the measurement of job satisfaction• problem predicting specific behaviour from global
attitudes• Differential relevance of various facets of satisfaction
Discussion QuestionWhy is the correlation between job satisfaction and
performance so weak?
Possible Answers3. Problems with the measurement of job
performance• Organ (1977): satisfaction should be a better measure
of extra-role (OCB) than in-role performance• Bateman & Organ (1981): r = .41 with OCB
Job Satisfaction and Absenteeism
HypothesisSatisfied workers will attend more regularly
Empirical Evidence Meta-analyses report correlations between -.15 and -
.25 (e.g., Hackett & Guion, 1985; Scott & Taylor,1985)
Potential Explanations1. Problems with the measurement of absenteeism (e.g.,
voluntary vs. involuntary)2. Satisfaction is one of many factors influencing
attendance (see Steers & Rhodes’ model)
Job Satisfaction and Turnover
HypothesisSatisfied workers should be less likely to leave
Empirical Evidence Meta-analyses report correlations between -.20 and -.30
(e.g., Griffeth et al., 2000; Lee et al., 1999; Tett &Meyer, 1993)
Potential Explanations1. Problems with the measurement of turnover (e.g.,
voluntary vs. involuntary)2. Satisfaction is one of many factors influencing turnover
(see Hom & Griffeth, 1991, model)
Summary• Job satisfaction is an attitude that can affect work
behaviour and personal well-being• Job satisfaction can be enhanced by:
Improving work conditions (job, role, relationships,etc.) Selecting those who:
Are predisposed to be satisfied Fit with the job, culture, role, etc.
• Job satisfaction has modest but meaningful effectson performance, attendance, retention etc.
Effects are strongest for “volitional” behaviour (e.g.,OCB, voluntary absence, voluntary turnover)