Jenn Hadley portfolio
-
Upload
jenn-hadley -
Category
Documents
-
view
231 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Jenn Hadley portfolio
hello!I’m Jenn Hadley. I do typesetting for publications, design production, project management, photography, and image retouching.
After graduating, Bachelor of Design Hons (Photography), I moved into layout, image retouching along with project, studio and production management in design studios and publishing houses.
I’m currently looking for contracts in the creative sector here in Wellington, from pubication and campaign layout to project and production managment.
Have a look at what I can offer, go on... just turn the page!
021 853 667
www
jennhadleyphotography.co.nz
books
AWA PRESS www.awapress.com
TYPESETTING, IMAGE RETouchING ANd PRoducTIoN.
cRAIG PoTToN PublIShING www.craigpottonpublishing.com
publications production
Described by Lonely Planet as the “coolest little capital
in the world”, Wellington has a great deal to be positive about in 2011.
Key factsWellington City, Porirua,
Upper Hutt and Hutt City make up the Wellington region.
364,000 people live
in the Wellington region, including strong Pacific communities and a diverse migrant community.
Key industries are
Iconic events include
The Rugby World Cup
public administration, professional, scientific and technical services, education and training, healthcare and social assistance.
the Wellington Sevens, World of Wearable Arts, and the New Zealand International Arts Festival.
will see seven matches played in Wellington.
Spo t l i g h t o n We l l i n g t o n
WellingtonDescribed by Lonely Planet as the “coolest little
capital in the world”, Wellington has a great
deal to be positive about in 2011, with the
Rugby World Cup, an improving labour market
and new services for clients.
Partnerships with local employers have
proved to be a great way to help employers
get the skilled workforce they need, and create
training and work opportunities for jobseekers.
Wellington region has formed industry
partnerships to create jobs for clients in retail,
hospitality, security, bus driving, caregiving,
business and administration.
The Rugby World Cup which kicks off
in September is expected to create significant
demand for workers. Work and Income is
working with employers involved in the event to
assist with their labour force planning. Security
is just one area expected to be in high demand.
Over the past year a pre-employment training
programme was set up to train people towards
the foundation qualification for the security
industry. This programme resulted in a high
number of clients getting work in the industry.
Work is also in progress with local councils
planning festival events to coincide with the
Cup. These include the Montana Wearable Arts
Awards, Jewellery Expo and the over 35’s rugby
tournament. Some councils are also looking at
bringing forward events to align with the Cup.
The Wellington labour market has shown
improvement on this time last year. Work and
Income has almost doubled the number of
clients placed into employment in December
2010 compared to the same month in 2009.
Redundancy notifications in the Wellington
region reduced considerably during 2010 – we
supported 19 employers and 196 employees in
2010, in contrast to 44 employers and 1,971
employees in 2009.
Although commentators predict the
Wellington labour market will remain flat for
some time with construction and manufacturing
remaining weak, anecdotal feedback suggests
businesses are optimistic about 2011.
The Community Link in Courts “CLiC”
project is being piloted by Porirua Community Link,
wrapping many services around people affected
by family violence. It is a court-based service that
links people to support and specialist agencies.
Porirua people affected by family violence can
access CLiC by self-referral, or by judicial referral
in the cases of Family Violence Court defendants
who are intending to plead guilty.
Limited Service Volunteer courses
expanded in April 2010 to run at Trentham
Military Camp in Upper Hutt, creating a
fantastic opportunity to increase the number of
young people on this course. The New Zealand
Defence Force and Work and Income have
strengthened the employment focus of the
course, including vocational training sessions
and a vocational room displaying job vacancies
and training opportunities. Work brokers also
work with clients on the course.
22 RISE: Issue 14 – March 2011 RISE: Issue 14 – March 2011 23
WHAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT THING? I T I S T H E P E O P L E , I T I S T H E P E O P L E , I T I S T H E P E O P L E
He aha te mea nui? he tangata, he tangata, he tangata
MINISTRY OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
World of WearableArt – a korowai with a purpose
Sophie Gray – living a rich life doesn’t cost a fortune
Stage Challenge – teamwork and footwork
It’s Not OK campaign – helping the families that need it most
Creativity
I S S U E 12 – S EP T EM B ER 2010
RISEMinistry of Social Development bi-monthly magazine.
4 / Fire+Rescue / October 2011 Fire+Rescue / October 2011 / 5
keep the parents busy and stop them
from taking their kids away before they
had been properly assessed.”
They set up two salvage sheets, one on
either side of the school bus. The walking
wounded were kept on one side and the
seriously injured on the other.
“Our biggest logistical problem was
getting enough blankets to keep everyone
warm as they were in shock. We gave
some of the kids our bunker coats and
local people started bringing in duvets
and blankets,” he said.
Whakatane Station Officer Doug Berben
arrived with their pump rescue tender.
“Ambulance staff had their work cut out
for them, and it was difficult to tell who
had been fully assessed and who hadn’t
until they started tagging the children.
We did what we could to help and kept
our eyes and ears open for any signs that
anyone was deteriorating,” said Doug.
With so many police and ambulance
personnel on the scene, Doug says it was
difficult for the Fire Service personnel to
work out who was in charge for the police
and St John. “They didn’t have the jerkins
that we have and so we spent a bit of time
trying to work out who we should be
talking to,” he said.
Taneatua’s Deputy Chief Fire Officer
Howard Black was designated as Safety
Officer and acted as Media Liaison. He said
the incident reminded him a bit of a mass
casualty exercise involving children that
the brigade had been involved in a few
years earlier. “I realise now how valuable
those exercises are,” he said.
Howard said the incident also showed how
important it was for the community to
pitch in and help when something big
happens. “The local people were fantastic
and everyone worked in well with each
other and the emergency services.”
He said even the media played their part,
holding back on any questions until all
the helicopters and ambulances had
taken away the injured children.
CFO Laurance Richardson said the
brigade had had two debriefs following
the incident, one on the night it happened
and the other the next day on the training
night. “It was the biggest event we’ve had
here in my 25 years with the brigade and
I’m extremely proud of how everyone
performed,” he said.
road-side
He kept up that hope until his
appliance arrived at the crash
scene at Ruatoki, near Whakatane,
a little after 3.30pm on 5 September.
“First I saw the logging truck and then
the bus in the paddock nearby – there
were kids crying and screaming and
a few adults had started arriving.”
Laurance started pulling the
operation together.
“We parked the truck so that it blocked
off the road. I left one person with the
injured driver who was still in the truck
and we went over to the bus and began
checking on the kids,” he said.
The Whakatane appliance arrived about
10 minutes after Taneatua and then the
Whakatane van with another nine
firefighters arrived within half an hour.
Basically, Laurance said he treated
the accident scene as a fire ground –
dividing it into sectors and making sure
communications and a safety officer
were in place and all the children were
being helped.
“It felt like pandemonium to start with,
and it looked a bit like a bomb had gone off.
There were so many injured kids, some of
them very seriously, with lots of lacerations
and broken limbs,” said Laurance.
In all, 35 children were injured.
Several ambulances and three
helicopters were used to transport the
injured with six children needing several
nights in hospital. One little girl was in
critical condition. The driver of the logging
truck was also admitted to hospital.
Laurance and his crew knew most of the
families of the children. “We did our best
to calm everyone down and we tried to
a parent’s worst
nightmareWhen the emergency call came in, ‘logging truck versus school bus’, Taneatua Chief Fire Officer Laurance Richardson hoped like hell that the bus had been empty of children.
It felt like pandemonium to start with, and it looked a bit like A bomb had gone off. there were so many injured kids, some of them very seriously, with lots of lacerations and broken limbs
he treated the accident scene as a fire ground _ dividing it into sectors and making sure communications and a safety officer were in place
Phot
o: L
ani H
epi
Phot
o: W
haka
tane
Bea
con
Phot
o: W
haka
tane
Bea
con
Scenes from the crash site at Ruatoki.
FIRE+REScuENew Zealand Fire Service’s monthly industry magazine.
out of the ruinsPlus
new normalUSar matUreS
april/may 2011 / Issue 68
PRoducTIoN MANAGEMENT, PhoToShoP & QuAlITY ASSuRANcE
vectorPointing to Safer aviation
Nov
embe
r / D
ecem
ber 2
011
Busting Wellington
Congestion in Westland national Park
Less Search, More rescue
Adventure Aviation Takes Off!
Flight Instructor Guide
New
VEcToRNew Zealand Civil Aviation Authority’s bi-monthly industry magazine.
The recently released Land and Water Forum report has underlined the
growing scrutiny around water management in New Zealand (Grower, October).
Water, a resource which is often taken for granted, is now recognised for what it is, a valuable and vital resource to every one of us in both the rural and urban sectors. For those whose livelihood is based upon the land and the crops they produce, the issue of water and their need for water take resource consents is vital to ensure the continuing success and development of their business.
However, anyone who assumes they will be guaranteed water take resource consent needs to be particularly careful. With the resource management rules changing they could face the real possibility their application will be declined, presenting them with a serious and permanent problem. Growers can no longer assume they will be granted consent, those days have gone. Today it is vital growers are pro-active and take responsibility by submitting their applications within time to avoid the chance of consent being declined.
Set up to look at ways of improving freshwater management in New Zealand,
Easy water is down the drain foreverGrowers can no longer take water for granted. Water meters are coming, and debate is swirling around issues such as transfer vs trading water for money. The waters are no longer still, and the complex issues around freshwater run deep. Barbara Gillham continues our water feature and spoke to those leading the debate for horticulture.
the Land and Water Forum comprised 58 organisations. Twenty two of the parties, including HortNZ, were nominated to a “small group” that did much of the policy review work and consensus building. The group recognised the need for an overall water strategy and for better ways of allocating water permits and their transfer.
Water is without doubt one of New Zealand’s major national advantages. Not only does it sustain life and support our ecosystems, it is also our key eco-nomic advantage and essential to our key industries. However while it rates well internationally its quality and avail-ability have deteriorated, making better water management and monitoring controls vital.
There are several reasons for this deterioration, one of which is the difficulty of setting and managing limits. According to the Land and Water Forum report “without limits it is hard to manage diffuse discharges – nutrients, microbes, sediment and other contaminants that wash into water from the land – and impossible to deal with the cumulative effects on water bodies of water takes on the one hand and diffuse and direct discharges to water on the other.”
“My first message to growers is to expect that metering will be required on most consents – you can’t manage what you can’t measure. You should also know what your water requirements are.”
7Vol 65 No 106 NewsNews
Continued over...
Vol 65 No 10
Your levy at work HortNZ activities
NZgrower
Vol 65 No 11 December 2010 Horticulture New ZealaNd
Veggies need Zespris Fragmentation doesn’t work
Trade barriers What they cost you
Profile: Dr Stuart Davis Busy in the boardroom of vegetables
HortNZ backs growers in fight for ETS justice
NZ GRoWERHorticulture New Zealand’s monthly trade magazine.
Photo: ©istock.com
/brytta
An article in the November/December 2007 issue of Vector discussed runway incursions, and cited two major accidents as examples – the 1977 Tenerife
collision between two Boeing 747s, with the loss of 583 lives, and the 2001 Milan collision between an MD-80 and a Cessna Citation, that killed 118.
Despite the high profile of accidents of this type, runway excursions are a far more common type of accident. A runway excursion is the departure of an aircraft from the runway surface, from either the runway end (an overrun) or the edge (a veer-off).
Runway excursions can occur on either takeoff or landing. According to Flight Safety Foundation (FSF) statistics for worldwide air transport accidents from 1995 to 2008, involving aircraft of over 5700 kg maximum takeoff weight, runway
Runway ExcursionsKeeping the aircraft within the confines of the runway during takeoff and landing is the intention of every pilot, but occasionally execution diverges from intention.
excursions comprised 97 per cent (417 of 431) of all runway-related accidents. Of the 417 runway excursion accidents, 34 were fatal, with a total of 712 lives lost. Landing occurrences outnumbered takeoff occurrences by about four to one.
How Do They Happen?The Flight Safety Foundation’s data analysis identified a number of risk factors for both the takeoff and landing cases. The most common risk factor in runway excursions on takeoff was a rejected takeoff above the takeoff decision speed (V1) – the speed above which, in the event of an engine failure, takeoff must be continued, and below which, takeoff must be abandoned. It is calculated before each takeoff, and is dependent on aircraft weight and aerodrome dimensions.
Next most common was loss of directional control by the pilot, followed by rejected takeoff below V1. Note that more than one risk factor may be present in any runway excursion event.
For landing occurrences, the number one risk factor was the failure to go around, followed by landing long, and runway
contamination leading to inadequate braking. Numerous other risk factors included approach and touchdown speeds too high, approach too high, crew resource management issues and non-compliance with standard operating procedures.
All of the risk factors listed are equally applicable in New Zealand, including runway contamination by snow, slush, or standing water.
Not Just Big AeroplanesRunway excursion accidents do not involve only heavy air transport aircraft. Sampling of the CAA database records from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2010 identified 28 light aeroplane and glider runway excursion accidents, of which 12 were overruns and 16 were veer-offs. A few accidents where the veer-off resulted from undercarriage failure in a heavy landing were not included. Nineteen occurred on landing, eight on takeoff, and one was not specific.
While most operators of large aircraft will have well-defined procedures that, when followed, should minimise the risk of a runway excursion, light aircraft owners and operators may not have access to similar information to assist with decision making and risk management relating to taking off and landing. A study of the FSF Report of the Runway Safety Initiative (available on http://flightsafety.org/current-safety-initiatives/runway-safety-initiative-rsi) will quickly conclude that most or all of the risk factors listed for the takeoff and landing cases are equally applicable to light aircraft. The astute pilot may be able to identify more that apply only to the light end of the spectrum – for example, the wide variety of surfaces utilised for takeoff and landing, as against the generally sealed-runway environment of large air transport aircraft.
Decisions, Decisions – Taking Off…A successful takeoff starts at the planning stage – the correct calculations of required takeoff distance and V1 in particular. Occasionally, an accident can be traced back to an error at this point.
Although V1 is the takeoff decision speed, in reality there should be no decision involved, as the required actions are clearly defined. Something wrong below V1, we stop; above V1, we go. Simple! Or so it seems. Why, then, are crews attempting rejected takeoffs above V1 when it is extremely likely that the aircraft won’t stop before reaching the end of the runway? In some cases, the crews have assessed the risk of continuing to be greater than the risk of an overrun, and in others, an abnormal sound, or something feeling “not quite right”.
In the case of the Kalitta Air Boeing 747-209F accident at Brussels Airport in May 2008, an abnormal sound prompted a rejected takeoff at V1 + 12 knots, resulting in a 300-metre overrun that terminated on the lip of a 20-metre railway cutting. During the overrun, the aircraft broke into three distinct portions as a result of a 4-metre drop over the aerodrome ring road.
The V1 calculation was based on the full runway length, but 300 metres of available takeoff run was not used, and reverse thrust was not selected after the takeoff was rejected. The abnormal sound was a loud bang from a compressor stall on number 3 engine, caused by the ingestion of a small bird. There were other contributing factors, which can be studied in the full report, available on the link http://www.mobilit.fgov.be/data/aero/accidents/AA-8-5.pdf.
Continued over »
8 9vector September / October 2011 vector September / October 2011
photography
thanksThanks for checking out my portfolio! If you think we could work together on exciting projects, please get in touch!
say hello!
021 853 667
www
jennhadleyphotography.co.nz
jenntakesphotos
jennhadleyphotography
jenntakesphotos