Jeff Neal 1 , Paul Bates 1 , Caroline Keef 2 , Keith Beven 3 and David Leedal 3
description
Transcript of Jeff Neal 1 , Paul Bates 1 , Caroline Keef 2 , Keith Beven 3 and David Leedal 3
![Page 1: Jeff Neal 1 , Paul Bates 1 , Caroline Keef 2 , Keith Beven 3 and David Leedal 3](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020308/56815f6a550346895dce6dec/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Modelling of the 2005 flood event in Carlisle and probabilistic flood risk
estimation at confluences
Jeff Neal1, Paul Bates1, Caroline Keef2, Keith Beven3 and David Leedal3
1School of Geographical Sciences, University Road, University of Bristol, Bristol. BS8 1SS.2JBA Consulting, South Barn, Broughton Hall, Skipton, N Yorkshire, BD23 3AE, UK.
3Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, UK.
![Page 2: Jeff Neal 1 , Paul Bates 1 , Caroline Keef 2 , Keith Beven 3 and David Leedal 3](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020308/56815f6a550346895dce6dec/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
• A Framework for Assessing Uncertainty in Flood Risk Mapping, Data and Modelling
• Carlisle 2005 event data• Overview• Evaluation data errors
• Inundation modelling example uncertainties• Channel hydraulics and gauges• Structural complexity• Resolution
• Beyond inundation modelling• Probabilistic flood risk at confluences• New numerical scheme• Results
Introduction
![Page 3: Jeff Neal 1 , Paul Bates 1 , Caroline Keef 2 , Keith Beven 3 and David Leedal 3](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020308/56815f6a550346895dce6dec/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Uncertainty Framework
• A framework for the discussion and assessment of uncertainty in flood risk mapping between analysts and clients, stakeholders and users
• A way to audit uncertainties in each element of the whole systems model
![Page 4: Jeff Neal 1 , Paul Bates 1 , Caroline Keef 2 , Keith Beven 3 and David Leedal 3](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020308/56815f6a550346895dce6dec/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
2005 event data
![Page 5: Jeff Neal 1 , Paul Bates 1 , Caroline Keef 2 , Keith Beven 3 and David Leedal 3](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020308/56815f6a550346895dce6dec/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
2005 event data
![Page 6: Jeff Neal 1 , Paul Bates 1 , Caroline Keef 2 , Keith Beven 3 and David Leedal 3](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020308/56815f6a550346895dce6dec/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
2005 event data
![Page 7: Jeff Neal 1 , Paul Bates 1 , Caroline Keef 2 , Keith Beven 3 and David Leedal 3](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020308/56815f6a550346895dce6dec/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Channel hydraulics and gauges
![Page 8: Jeff Neal 1 , Paul Bates 1 , Caroline Keef 2 , Keith Beven 3 and David Leedal 3](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020308/56815f6a550346895dce6dec/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
1D/2D model complexity
![Page 9: Jeff Neal 1 , Paul Bates 1 , Caroline Keef 2 , Keith Beven 3 and David Leedal 3](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020308/56815f6a550346895dce6dec/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Urban floodplain processes
Neal et al., 2009
25 m resolution10 m resolution5 m resolution
![Page 10: Jeff Neal 1 , Paul Bates 1 , Caroline Keef 2 , Keith Beven 3 and David Leedal 3](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020308/56815f6a550346895dce6dec/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Probabilistic flood risk mapping at confluences
Q
RP
![Page 11: Jeff Neal 1 , Paul Bates 1 , Caroline Keef 2 , Keith Beven 3 and David Leedal 3](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020308/56815f6a550346895dce6dec/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Q
RP
Q
RP
Q
RP
The problem at confluences
? ?
![Page 12: Jeff Neal 1 , Paul Bates 1 , Caroline Keef 2 , Keith Beven 3 and David Leedal 3](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020308/56815f6a550346895dce6dec/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Set Δ of m gauges. Each is a random
variable X at location i
Marginal distributions at each location Yi
Conditional distribution, spatial
dependence
Simulate events over time t (e.g. 100 years) when y at Yi
is greater than u
Sample from data at gauges Δ
(Block bootstrapping)
The problem at confluences
• Model the conditional distribution of a set of variables given that one of these variables exceeds a high threshold.
Event simulation with spatial dependence
![Page 13: Jeff Neal 1 , Paul Bates 1 , Caroline Keef 2 , Keith Beven 3 and David Leedal 3](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020308/56815f6a550346895dce6dec/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Set Δ of m gauges. Each is a random
variable X at location i
Marginal distributions at each location Yi
Conditional distribution (spatial
dependence)
Simulate events over time t (e.g. 100 years) when y at Yi
is greater than u
Sample from data at gauges Δ
(Block bootstrapping)
The problem at confluences (uncertainty)
• Model the conditional distribution of a set of variables given that one of these variables exceeds a high threshold.
Refit to data and run event generator may times to approximate uncertainty
![Page 14: Jeff Neal 1 , Paul Bates 1 , Caroline Keef 2 , Keith Beven 3 and David Leedal 3](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020308/56815f6a550346895dce6dec/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Hydraulic modelling
4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0
45
67
89
10
Sheepmount
Model
Empi
rical
2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.02.
02.
22.
42.
62.
83.
03.
2
Cummersdale
Model
Empi
rical
1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
Harraby Green
Model
Empi
rical
3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.4
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
Linstock
Model
Empi
rical
3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
Great Corby
Model
Empi
rical
2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4
2.5
3.0
3.5
Greenholme
Model
Empi
rical
![Page 15: Jeff Neal 1 , Paul Bates 1 , Caroline Keef 2 , Keith Beven 3 and David Leedal 3](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020308/56815f6a550346895dce6dec/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
A new LISFLOOD-FP formulation
• Continuity Equation• Continuity equation relating flow fluxes and change in cell depth
• Momentum Equation• Flow between two cells is
calculated using:
• Manning’s equation (ATS)
2
,1,,1,,
xQQQQ
th ji
yjiy
jix
jix
ji
xxzh
nhQ
2135
flow )(
i jhflow
i j
Representation of flow between cells in LISFLOOD-FP
xhqtnghxzhtghq
Qflowflow
flow
3/102 /1
![Page 16: Jeff Neal 1 , Paul Bates 1 , Caroline Keef 2 , Keith Beven 3 and David Leedal 3](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020308/56815f6a550346895dce6dec/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
A new LISFLOOD-FP formulation
![Page 17: Jeff Neal 1 , Paul Bates 1 , Caroline Keef 2 , Keith Beven 3 and David Leedal 3](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020308/56815f6a550346895dce6dec/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
A new LISFLOOD-FP formulation
![Page 18: Jeff Neal 1 , Paul Bates 1 , Caroline Keef 2 , Keith Beven 3 and David Leedal 3](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020308/56815f6a550346895dce6dec/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Hydraulic modelling
• LISFLOOD-FP hydraulic model (Bates et al., 2010)• 1D diffusive channel model• 2D floodplain model at 10 m resolution• Model calibrated on 2005 flood event (RMSE 0.25 m).
![Page 19: Jeff Neal 1 , Paul Bates 1 , Caroline Keef 2 , Keith Beven 3 and David Leedal 3](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020308/56815f6a550346895dce6dec/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Hydraulic modelling
• LISFLOOD-FP hydraulic model (Bates et al., 2010)• 1D diffusive channel model• 2D floodplain model at 10 m resolution• Model calibrated on 2005 flood event (RMSE 0.25 m).
• Event simulation• 47000 events• Scaled 2005 hydrographs• Event simulation time was 0.1-2 hours• Analysis took 5 days and generated 40 GB of data
![Page 20: Jeff Neal 1 , Paul Bates 1 , Caroline Keef 2 , Keith Beven 3 and David Leedal 3](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020308/56815f6a550346895dce6dec/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Run 1 flood frequency• Run 1 of the event generator using all flow data
![Page 21: Jeff Neal 1 , Paul Bates 1 , Caroline Keef 2 , Keith Beven 3 and David Leedal 3](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020308/56815f6a550346895dce6dec/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Run 1 flood frequency
• The maximum flood outline was a combination of multiple events.
• Cannot assume same return period on all tributaries
![Page 22: Jeff Neal 1 , Paul Bates 1 , Caroline Keef 2 , Keith Beven 3 and David Leedal 3](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020308/56815f6a550346895dce6dec/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Uncertainty in the 1 in 100 yr flood outline
![Page 23: Jeff Neal 1 , Paul Bates 1 , Caroline Keef 2 , Keith Beven 3 and David Leedal 3](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020308/56815f6a550346895dce6dec/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Risk• MasterMap building outlines• Depth damage curve• Calculate damage from each event
![Page 24: Jeff Neal 1 , Paul Bates 1 , Caroline Keef 2 , Keith Beven 3 and David Leedal 3](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020308/56815f6a550346895dce6dec/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Conclusions• Flooding at confluences is critical to the basin-wide development of
flood hazard and depends on the joint spatial distribution of flows.• Assuming steady state flows over predicted flood hazard for a range of
flows and event durations.• The maximum flood outline was a combination of multiple events.
• Cannot assume the same return period on all tributaries• Risk assessment using the event data was demonstrated.
• Expected damages increase nonlinearly. • As expected a few events caused most of the damage.