Japan NCAP Update
-
Upload
global-ncap -
Category
Automotive
-
view
256 -
download
10
Transcript of Japan NCAP Update
![Page 1: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
28th October 20162016 Global NCAP Annual Meeting
Takahiro Omori of NASVA(National Agency for Automotive Safety and Victims’
Aid)
JNCAP UPDATE
![Page 2: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Features to be addressed for vehicle safety in Japan• After long year decrease, fatalities caused by vehicle crashes
increased to 4117 in 2015. MLIT is aiming to reduce fatalities by about 270 in 5 years.
• Pedestrian and bicyclist are about half of all.
• Elderly people, more than 65 years old, are more than half.
• Elderly people, more than 65 years old, caused more than 25 % of fatal crashes.
• About 70% of pedestrian fatal crashes occur in the night time.
MLIT plans to enhance regulation, NCAP and everything.
![Page 3: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Outline of JNCAP
![Page 4: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
NASVAMLIT
- Procurement of test vehicles- Implementation of tests- Public Relations - Making proposals of new tests- Communication with stakeholders
DesignationImplementation/communication
JNCAP Steering Committee Meeting - Determination of test procedures - Determination of test models - Confirmation of test results
Complicated technical issues are discussed at Working Groups and Task Forces which are organized by NASVA.
Cooperation with JARI
JNCAP is MLIT’s project.
Outline of JNCAP
4
![Page 5: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Secretariats of JNCAP as of 10/1/2016MLIT Director: Hidenobu Kubota Yuki Ebihara Satoru InoueNASVA A member of the board of directors: Takahiro Ikari Director: Takahiro Omori Manager:Haruo Otani Shouhei Hashimoto Kenichi Endo Shingo Nomoto Kohei Ukai Takumi Yagi Yoko KishinoJASIC Director of WashingtonD.C. office Kenji Sato
5
![Page 6: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
JNCAP items
Preventive Safety Assessment
6
![Page 7: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
2016 JNCAP Road Map
![Page 8: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Collision Safety
![Page 9: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
2016 JNCAP Road Map on Collision Safety
*1 Small overlap, pole, fuel leakage by rear collision, rear passenger neck injury, etc.
![Page 10: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Passenger Protection
![Page 11: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Point Upper limit Lower limit choice totalChest Accel. 3ms 4 373m/ s2 588m/ s2
Chest Defrection 4 22mm 50mmDriver Steering wheel lower displacement -1 90mm 110mm
Point Upper limit Lower limit totalChest Defrection 4 22mm 42mmChest Accel. 3ms
Steering wheel lower displacement -1 90mm 110mmSecondly impact with steering wheel -1 without with
lowestvalue
Evaluation item
Evaluation item
If a3ms≧ 588m/ s2 ⇒ 0pointDriver
Frontal collision test ( FRB , ODB )
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
from 1995 ( FRB ) 2000 ( ODB )
Study Small change
Small c hange on chest evaluation 1) Belt pass
2) Evaluation of HY-III AM50
2015
2016
AM50 AF05
~~
Deflection
Deflection
11
![Page 12: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
• Change of full frontal crash test coordinating with UN R137 from 2018.
• Change of side crash test in accordance with the change of real passenger vehicles’ dimensions and development of dummy from 2018.
• Introducing fitment evaluation of AACN and ACN from 2018
Things under discussion for passenger collision safety evaluation
![Page 13: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Changes of passenger collision safety evaluation
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
・ Full frontal collision - coordinating with UN R137 ・ Evaluation of small female occupant Hybrid III AF05? ・ Threshold considering elderly people・ Side collision ・ Change of moving barrier in accordance with the change of real passenger vehicles’ dimensions →AE-MDB? ・ Evaluation dummy Front: WorldSID? Used in UN pole side-impact regulation Rear: SID II-s? Problems of chest deflection measurement ・ Threshold considering elderly people
Change?Study Study
13
![Page 14: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Weight of vehicles for MDB• From 2000 to 2013, average curb weight of JNCAP tested vehicles is 1215kg.• Considering average number of passengers ”1.5” and average weight of
people “55kg”, average weight of a vehicle weight is about 1300kg. (1215kg + 55kg×1.5people = 1297kg) • The weight of AE-MDB is 1300kg.
Ave.1215kg
![Page 15: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
AE-MDB
150 500
60
JNCAP currentMDB
Euro NCAPAE-MDB ver 3.9
current MDB(UN R95)
AE-MDB
weight 950kg 1300kgrigidity 1 1.3dimension See below
350
550
300550
800
Domestic 113modelsH. Yonezawa et al., 2001, 17th ESV, Paper number 26
376504788
300
![Page 16: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Benefit of WorldSID 50th male
ES2 WorldSID
THORAX : DeflectionABDOMEN : Force
THORAX : DeflectionABDOMEN :
Deflection
THORAX
ABDOMEN
変位計
変位計
荷重計
FR
FR FR
THORAX & ABDOMEN
FR
Enhanced bio-fidelity for side impact evaluation
![Page 17: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Advanced Automatic Crash Notification system (AACN)
• Not only automatically making a call to an operator to send information (place, vehicle, etc.) of the crash for an ambulance when a vehicle crash occurs and airbags deploy, but also directly sending emergency medical services injury information of passengers estimated by crash information.
• Why JNCAP?
![Page 18: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
AACN and ACN
Operator
Place & vehicle
information
Automatically
call and sendCall
Emergency medical serveice
AmbulanceControl
At the same time
Send
crashinformation
Estimated injury
information
CrashRescue
Deployment of airbags
Sending medical vehicle with a doctor in proportion to injury
Call
Confirmation call
![Page 19: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
What JNCAP can do for AACN• Ambulance control centers and Emergency medical
services cannot fully support this system because practically only two auto makers are promoting fitment of AACN and ACN.
• The reason other auto makers do not promote is “Cost” and “Benefit”. They say that Infrastructure for this system is too limited and people cannot use it for now. This is a Chicken and Egg problem.
• Therefore, people expect JNCAP to run campaigns to have people buy vehicles with AACN or ACN by using persuasive leaflets (from 2016) and assessment results (from 2018)(for example, vehicles with AACN or ACN can acquire fitment points for passenger collision safety performance evaluation).
![Page 20: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Pedestrian Protection
![Page 21: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Pedestrian head protection perf. tests
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
from 2003 change
Ref: 1st&3rd JNCAP investigative commission in 2015
2015~ 2016 ≓ EuroNCAP)~(
Impact speed 35km/ h 40km/ h
Impact angle Adult 65° (1700mm WAD): < Child 50° (1000mm≦ WAD≦ 1700): Child 20° (Blue line WAD 1000mm): < <
Image of area division
Area method [Area I,II,III*6*4] Grid method [100mm interval]
How to select evaluation impact point Authorities arbitrariness selection Random selection
Evaluation area 82.5mm from side standard line 50mm from side standard line
Evaluation threshold Linear scale [HIC: 650 2000]~ Step scale [HIC: 650~1700]
Number of test points [experience] 13 10+α
Area I Area II Area III Area I Area II Area IIISedan 65° 65° 65° 40° 40° 40°
Multipurpose 90° 60° 60° 40° 40° 40°Minivan 50° 25° 25° 45° 45° 45°
Hood Windshield
21
![Page 22: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Pedestrian leg protection perf. tests
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
from 2011 Small change
Change of evaluation threshold
Current scale New scale
Level stage 4 stages (current) ⇒ 5 stages (New) Pedestrian protection performance evaluation Head : Leg = 75 : 25 (current) ⇒ 80 : 20 (New) The pedestrian protection performance are made to be offset and it uses it for the overall eveluation up to 2018.
offset ( overall evaluation)
Point Point
22
![Page 23: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Other things under discussion or to be studied for pedestrian crash safety
• Active devices like airbags for pedestrian safety which are also called “deployable systems” in EuroNCAP protocol are to be fitted more on passenger vehicles because of its big effect especially on mitigation of impact on A-pillars covered by airbags.
Therefore, JNCAP prepares test procedures for these devices referring to EuroNCAP protocol in 2016.
- Verification of functioning - Verification of safety without functioning at lower speed
(only for covering area and excluding red points)
![Page 24: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Air-bag for pedestrian safety
![Page 25: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Over all evaluation of Collision Safety Performance
![Page 26: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
3-2. Overall Evaluation for Collision Safety Performance
Series1
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
36.4 33.3 13.1 10.7 6.2
Because of the fact that fatalities of “Pedestrian” and “Occupant” from road accidents hold most of all, “Overall Safety Performance evaluation” was introduced in 2011.
Ratio of fatalities by road user type ( 2014 )
Pedestrian Occupant
Cyclist Motorcyclist
【 Overall Evaluation of Collision Safety Performance 】 Performed on a five-level rating☆ ( full mark of 5 stars )
《☆☆☆☆☆ Requirement 》Needs 170points and more, moreover well balanced earning
of each tests will be neededOverall Evaluation of Collision Safety Performance (208 points) with 5 star rating
100pt 100pt 8pt
![Page 27: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Change of overall Collision Safety Performance Evaluation from 2018
• Mitigation effect will be evaluated by social cost coordinating with that of Preventive Safety Evaluation.
• Points will be distributed according to mitigation effect of accident victims excluding the effect of regulation.
• This idea will bring us more effective and efficient evaluation method. JNCAP will think about the evaluation method through research planned in 2016 and 2017 to fill blank area of the Road Map after 2018.
• This change also enables JNCAP to implement Comprehensive Evaluation of Preventive and Collision Safety Performance
This doesn’t mean JNCAP starts this comprehensive evaluation from 2018, because major devices for preventive safety are still in developing phase and not ready for performance competition.
![Page 28: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Preventive Safety
![Page 29: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
2016 JNCAP Road Map on Preventive Safety
*2 AEB(car to bicycle, intersection), Wrong pedal stepping, Driver drowsiness detection etc.
![Page 30: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Transition of the fitment number of advanced safety technology
LDWS is a system which detects deviation and alerts driver.
AEBS ( car to car ) LDWS
Device volume( k unit )
平成(年)
・ Many manufacturers are now putting new technologies on the market and production volume of vehicles with preventive safety technologies such as AEBS are rapidly increasing.・ Spreading of safer cars are anticipated.
(出典:国交省 ASV 技術普及状況調査)
AEBS is the system which detects forward vehicle with camera or radar and alerts the driver
AEBS (car to car) and LDWS
AEBS
LDWS
Source: ASV technology survey of MLIT
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 30
![Page 31: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Addition1
・ Addition 1(from 2015); ○ Rear view monitor system Child body sized objects (poles) are placed in rear area where accidents are more likely to be caused by relatives.
Addition2
・ Addition 2(from 2016) ; AEBS test for pedestrian Two Test Scenarios; CPN (Car to Pedestrian Nearside) CPNO (Car to Pedestrian Nearside Obstruction) +Evaluation of specific speed(Child, 25,75%lap, 8km/h walk,etc.)
Study
Preventive Safety Performance Assessment items
31
![Page 32: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Brake performance tests
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
End
Dry road surface Wet road surface
from 1995
Brake performance at 100 km/h
The distance until stopping has shortened. The difference between "dry"and "wet" has become small. The brake performance seems to be evaluated in the AEBS test. ⇒ Brake performance test is ended at 2015 to evaluate safety performance efficiently.
32
![Page 33: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Overall evaluation of Preventive safety performance
Pedestrian day time
Rear view monitorCar to car
pts.pts. pts.
pts.
Full score
pts.
pts.
pts.
pts.
33
25
![Page 34: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Tactics to increase vehicles with preventive safety devices
• Thresholds of preventive safety awards are not so hard to reach because major devices for preventive safety are still in developing phase and not ready for performance competition.
• Therefore, Aiming of evaluation of preventive safety performance for now is showing off vehicles with preventive safety devices. Auto makers can use the awards on TV CM and their brochures to show off fitment of preventive safety devices.
• With this tactics, vehicles with these devices are rapidly increasing.
![Page 35: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
• Introducing Lane Departure Prevention system (LDP) and Lane Keeping Assist system (LKA) evaluation
• Introducing AEB for pedestrian for night time
• Improvement of pedestrian target for AEB
Things under discussion for preventive safety evaluation
![Page 36: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
Lane Departure Prevention system (LDP) and Lane Keeping Assist system (LKA) evaluation
![Page 37: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
• Crash data for points are already used for LDW evaluation. Deference is functioning ratio.
• Approaching speed, steering condition, thresholds, etc. have to be determined for automatic control considering deference of LDP and LKA through crash data analisys.
• To review marker line.
LDP and LKA evaluation
![Page 38: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Test image
10.0m
0.50m
操舵エリア
目標軌跡
レーンマーカ接近速度
試験車速
0.75m
3.5m
![Page 39: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
AEB for pedestrian for night time
![Page 40: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
①Test scenariosCrossing with/without obstruction For night time, ・ Crashes with crossing pedestrian are major issues like daytime, ・ Crossing cases from just behind other vehicles (blind spot) are about 20% of them.
駐停車/走行車両
の直前直後 23%
横断歩道外
横断 20%
斜め横断 5%
横断禁止 2%信号無視 7%
飛び出し3%
その他の
違反 7%
違反なし31%
人対車両/横断中,夜
社会損失額
2,541,231万円
Social loss
10K yen
Just behind vehicles 23%
Pedestrian’s violation, car to pedestrian, crossing, night time
Crossing outside crossing point 20%
Running into road 3%
Ignoring signal 7%
No violation 31%
![Page 41: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
横断中(飛び出し除く),夜間条件
遮蔽なし左から23.3%
遮蔽なし右から52.4%
遮蔽あり左から7.4%
遮蔽あり右から16.9%
社会損失額(夜)2,370,944万円
41
Crossing from far side “ Far side” cases are about 70% of crossing pedestrian to car crashes.
②Crossing direction
Far side, with obstruction 16.9%
Pedestrian’s walking situation (except running), car to pedestrian, crossing, night time
Far side, without obstruction 52.4%
Near side, with obstruction 7.4%
Near side, without obstruction 23.3%
Social loss
10K yen
![Page 42: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
③ ターゲット
社会損失額2, 541, 231万円
子供2. 2%
高齢者65. 2%
その他32. 5%
Pedestrian target is adult. Crashes with children are not many.
Pedestrian’s age, car to pedestrian, crossing, night time
Child (less than 13 years old) 2.2%
Elderly (over 65years old) 65.2%
Others
Social loss
10K. yen
![Page 43: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
45
④Luminous intensity
40m
max 20LuxLamp
40mLamp
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
件数
[件]
照度[Lx]
水平面照度Brighter condition
Darker condition
Level surface luminous intensity (Lx)
Microscopic investigation data
Num
ber o
f cra
shes
?
Difficult to determine luminous intensity and lighting condition In brighter condition, people don’t usually use driving beam. An idea of using Adaptive Driving Beams (ADB) only for darker condtion. Otherwise dipped beam.
![Page 44: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
車速条件 遮蔽なし 遮蔽あり10km/ h - -15km/ h - -20km/ h - -25km/ h - -30km/ h 3 135km/ h 5 240km/ h 7 245km/ h 9 250km/ h 9 255km/ h 7 160km/ h 4 1合計 44 11
横断中(飛び出し除外),夜間(薄暮含む)
071421283542495663707784
危険認知速度
社会
損失
額(億
円)
車速条件 遮蔽なし 遮蔽あり10km/ h 1 -15km/ h 1 -20km/ h 2 -25km/ h 2 130km/ h 2 135km/ h 3 140km/ h 3 145km/ h 2 150km/ h 2 -55km/ h 1 -60km/ h 1 -合計 20 5
横断中(飛び出し除外),昼間
071421283542495663707784
危険認知速度
社会
損失
額(億
円)
55
46
⑤Points
25 Points
Points
With Obstruction
Without Obstruction
Day time
Night time
With Obstruction
Without Obstruction
With Obstruction
Without Obstruction
![Page 45: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
47
Issures of target of AEB for pedestrian• Integration of leg moving target and stiff target Caused by posture and leg moving pace of the
target.• Adequate height target for Japanese people. →Difficult to be understood by people
• Cost of conducting tests caused by dummy durability, etc.
→limiting the number of tests.
![Page 46: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Apprehension for over trusting for Preventive Safety technologies
• Considering possibility of misunderstanding of effect of advanced safety technologies, a guideline for publication is already made by Auto Fair Trade Counsil and used by auto makers.
Example: -Caution should be shown beside technology expanation using designated character points.
• JNCAP has to decide what has to be written with JNCAP marks to lessen over trusting of users.
![Page 47: Japan NCAP Update](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033007/58728a9e1a28ab36118b4fe3/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Publication of Preventive Safety Evaluation
On December 1st, at JARI, JNCAP will publicize evaluation results of vehicles with AEB for pedestrian
for the first time. With this event, small demonstration of AEB for pedestrian will be held.
This is a good opportunity to have people know JNCAP because pedestrian crash is a big issue in Japan due to
the number of victims.