January 24, 2008

54
January 24, 2008

description

January 24, 2008. Reading Assignment for Tuesday, January 29. Rich Williams (SOC) and Judy Fox (LAW)/Foreclosed and Abandoned Houses in SB/ Changing Face of Inequality, available at: https://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam/ndonly/rwpubs/SocialProblems2005.pdf ; or - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of January 24, 2008

Page 1: January 24, 2008

January 24, 2008

Page 2: January 24, 2008

Reading Assignment for Tuesday, January 29

• Rich Williams (SOC) and Judy Fox (LAW)/Foreclosed and Abandoned Houses in SB/ Changing Face of Inequality, available at:– https://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam/ndonly/rwpubs/

SocialProblems2005.pdf; or– http://www.nd.edu/~jwarlick/courses/html

Page 3: January 24, 2008

Extra Credit Event

William Julius Wilson Lecture:

Poverty and Inequality in Urban America

Sunday, Jan. 27th, 7:00 pm,

101 Debartolo Hall!!

Page 4: January 24, 2008

Outline for today

• Turn in papers– Observations about our public opinion poll?

• A quick quiz• Questions about Professor Betson’s lecture• A few more comments about Measuring

poverty• Ch. 1, What’s the point?• Taxes and the poor, featuring the EITC

Page 5: January 24, 2008

Turn in your papers now!

• Pass to someone on the aisle.

Page 6: January 24, 2008

Quick Quiz

1. Indicate whether the following statement is true or false:

– “The U.S. is the only country to adopt an official (government authorized) poverty measure.”

A. True

B. False

Page 7: January 24, 2008

Questions about Betson Lecture?

• Mollie Orshansky’s obituary is posted on my web site http://www.nd.edu/~jwarlick

• Also see http://www.ssa.gov/history/orshansky.html

• Economists contribution: development of equivalence scales

– “a means to allow for the comparison of the poverty status of families of various sizes and compositions”

– See: http://www.irp.wisc.edu/research/method/oakvos.htm

• Betson’s methods -- microsimulation with cross-sectional surveys of American households

Page 8: January 24, 2008

A bit more about Measuring Poverty

• International Poverty Line, $1-per-dayhttp://earthtrends.wri.org/images/pop_fea_dimofpov_fig4.jpg

• Alternatives to income-poverty: multidimensional indexes of poverty focused on capabilities– Amartya Sen, Nobel Prize winner, 1999

Page 9: January 24, 2008

Capability Deprivation

• . . . In analyzing social justice, there is a strong case for judging individual advantage in terms of the capabilities that a person has, that is the substantive freedoms he or she has to lead the kind of life he or she has reason to value. In this perspective, poverty must be seem as the deprivation of basic capabilities rather than merely as lowness of incomes. . .– Amartya Sen, “Poverty as Capability Deprivation,”

Development as Freedom (New York: Anchor Books, 1999).

Page 10: January 24, 2008

World Bank definition of the dimensions of poverty

• Income poverty--material deprivation• Health and education• Vunerability--exposure to risks• Voicelessness and powerlessness--

exclusion from political processes

• http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTPOVERTY/0,,contentMDK:20194762~pagePK:148956~piPK:216618~theSitePK

:336992,00.html

Page 11: January 24, 2008

Implications for Development Policies

• Development should not focus solely on raising incomes/consumption to reduce material deprivation, but also on enlarging people’s choices.

• Progress should not be measured in economic terms alone.

Page 12: January 24, 2008

Is it feasible to measure poverty using Sen’s

definition?• Human Development Index

– http://hdr.undp.org/en/ – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/

Human_Development_Index#Top_thirty_countries

Page 13: January 24, 2008

What’s the point of Chapter 1?

“Money and Its Opposite”2. Which of the following best expresses your

answer to the question above:A. To show adults in working poor families behave

unwiselyB. To show that the choices available to the working

poor are constrained relative to those with greater economic resources

C. To emphasis that the working poor face higher prices in financial markets and that these higher prices make it difficult for them to obtain basic necessities

D. None of the above

Page 14: January 24, 2008

Your thoughts

Page 15: January 24, 2008

Taxes and the Working Poor

Presentation 5

January 24, 2008

Page 16: January 24, 2008

Do the working poor pay taxes?

• Payroll taxes• Income taxes: Federal, State County, and local

• Sales taxes: – State and Local– 6% in Indiana

• Property taxes– collected by the local county treasurers, – based on assessments that are provided by the township

and county assessors– Range from 2 to 3% in South Bend

Page 17: January 24, 2008

Payroll Tax

• Tax Base: Earnings (wages and salaries)

• Tax individually paid by both employer and employee:

– OASI Portion: 6.2% of first $94,200 of Earnings– HI Portion: 1.45% of Earnings

Page 18: January 24, 2008

Payroll Taxes

Earnings

Tax ($)

$94,200

OASI

HI

OASI + HI

Page 19: January 24, 2008

Income Tax• Income

– Income Preferences -- Special Treatment of Certain Types of Income– Adjustments to Income

• Adjusted Gross Income– Deductions from Income Standard (single) $5,150 or (married) $10,300)

Itemized Deductions:– Medical and Dental Spending– Taxes Paid to other levels of Government– Interest Paid (Homes and Investments)– Gifts to Charity– Job Expenses, Thief Losses, Other

– Personal Exemptions ($3,300 per member)

• Taxable Income• Gross Tax Liability• + Tax Credits (EITC$$$$)• Net Tax Liability

Page 20: January 24, 2008

Tax Credits

• Different kinds of tax credits– Child- and dependent-care credit– Credit for the elderly or disabled

– Retirement savings contributions credit

– Adoption expenses credit– Hope and Lifetime Learning education credits

Page 21: January 24, 2008

Tax Credits, cont.

• Even better than deductions?!?– Deductions reduce your amount of taxable income

– credits cut your actual tax bill, dollar-for-dollar

Page 22: January 24, 2008

Tax Credits, cont.

• Non-refundable vs. Refundable credits– Nonrefundable credits can take your tax

down to nothing, but you can't get money back from the government

– Refundable credits may eliminate any tax you owe and provide you with a refund$$$

• Earned Income Tax Credit is a refundable tax credit targeted at the working poor!!!!!

Page 23: January 24, 2008

Tax Rates Terms

• Marginal Tax Rate -- if you earn one more dollar, what percent of that additional dollar do you pay in taxes?

Page 24: January 24, 2008

Marginal Federal Tax Rates

Lower Income Limit

on Taxable Income:

MRT Single Married

10% 0 0

15% $7,550 $15,100

25% $30,650 $61,300

28% $74,200 $123,700

33% $154,800 $188,450

35% $336,500 $336,500

Page 25: January 24, 2008

Tax Terms, cont.

• Average Tax Rate -- what percent of your income do you pay in taxes?

Page 26: January 24, 2008

Average Federal Tax Rates of U.S. Households, 2001 and 2004

2001 2004Upper income

limit 2004

Lowest 20% 5.4 5.2 $18,486

Second 20% 11.6 11.1 $34,675

Middle 20% 15.2 14.6 $55,230

Fourth 20% 19.3 18.5 $88,002

Highest 20% 26.8 23.8

Top 1% 30.1 25.6 LL: $150,499

Page 27: January 24, 2008

Sources for Previous Slides

• Congressional Budget Office, Effective Federal Tax Rates under Current Law, 2001 to 2014 (Washington, D.C.: Congressional Budget Office, August 2004), table 2.

• U.S. Census Bureau, Income: Historical Income Tables--Households, Table H-1: Income Limits for Each Fifth and Top 5 Percent of Households, All R aces, 1967 to 2006. Available at http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/histinc/h01ar.html

Page 28: January 24, 2008

Tax Equity TermsBased on Average Tax Rates

• Regressive -- Falling Average Tax Rate– Examples: OASI payroll tax– Sales taxes: As income rises, you spend less

• Proportional -- Constant Average Tax Rate– Example: HI payroll tax, property tax

• Progressive -- Rising Average Tax Rate– Example: Income Tax

• All taxes considered, the US Tax system is progressive!!!

Page 29: January 24, 2008

What means-tested welfare programs are available for poor people in the U.S.?

• Federal and State governments funded 85 welfare programs in FY 2002 at a total cost of $522 billion.– Federal Share: 71%– State and Local Share: 29%

• The means-tested programs fall into 8 different categories.

(Source for this and the next 2 slides : House Ways and Means Committee 2004 Green Book, http://www.gpoaccess.gov/wmprints/green/2004.html )

Page 30: January 24, 2008

Understanding the EITC

Page 31: January 24, 2008

Eight Categories of Welfare Programs and Total Costs, 2002

– Medical Aid: $282 billion, 54%– Cash Aid: $102 billion, 20%– Food Aid: $39 billion, 7%– Housing Aid: $36 billion, 7%– Education Aid: $30 billion, 6%– Other Services: $22 billion, 5%– Jobs and Training Aid: $8 billion, 2%– Energy Aid: $2 billion, 0.3%

Page 32: January 24, 2008

7 largest programs by amount spent

• Medicaid ($258 billion)• SSI ($39 billion)• EITC ($28 billion)• Food Stamps ($24 billion)• TANF cash, ,services, child care, and work

activities ($24 billion)• Section 8 low-income housing assistance

($18 billion)• Pell Grants ($11)

Page 33: January 24, 2008

Learn more about the EITC

• Greenstein, “The Earned Income Tax Credit: Boosting Employment, Aiding the Working Poor,” http://www.cbpp.org/7-19-05eic.htm

• Jason A. Levitis and Nicholas Johnson, “Together, State Minimum Wages and State Earned Income Tax Credits Make Work Pay,” http://www.cbpp.org/7-12-06sfp.pdf

• DeParle, Ch. 17: Money: Milwaukee, Summer 1999

Page 34: January 24, 2008

Additional Sources

• A. Nagle and N. Johnson, “A Hand Up: How State Income Tax Credits Help Working Families Escape Poverty In 2006,” Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, www.cbpp.org

• S. Holt, “The Earned Income Tax Credit at Age 30: What We Know,” The Brookings Institution, February, 2006 http://www.brookings.edu/metro/pubs/20060209_Holt.pdf

• Citizens for Tax Justice, “The Hidden Entitlements,” 1996 http://www.ctj.org/hid_ent/part-3/part3-3.htm

• Ifie Okwuje and Nicholas Johnson, “A RISING NUMBER OF STATE EARNED INCOME TAX CREDITS ARE HELPING WORKING FAMILIES ESCAPE POVERTY,” Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, October 20, 2006 http://www.cbpp.org/10-12-06sfp.pdf

Page 35: January 24, 2008

EITC Questions

• What is the EITC and how does it work?

• Who receives the EITC?

• How large are the credits?

• Which States supplement the credit?

• Why is the EITC politically popular?

• Will this popularity last?-- problems with the EITC

Page 36: January 24, 2008

What is the EITC and how does it work?

• A tax reduction and wage supplement for low- and moderate-income families

• Available to both single parent, two parent families, and childless low-income workers

• Must work to be eligible• A refundable credit, which means that if the credit amount is

larger than a family’s income tax bill, the family receives a refund check equal to the difference.

• Usually claimed when the income tax return is filed. Can opt for equal monthly payments.

Page 37: January 24, 2008

Source: Tax Policy Center, Joint effort of the Urban Institute and Brookings Institution http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/TaxFacts/TFDB/Content/PDF/eitc_parameters.pdf

Page 38: January 24, 2008

•Source: Together,State Minimum Wages and State Earned Income Tax Credits Make Work Pay” Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, http://www.cbpp.org/7-12-06sfp.pdf

Page 39: January 24, 2008

Example

• A single parent with two children working nearly full-time--52 weeks per year at 38 hours per week--at the minimum wage of $5.15 per hour has an annual income of about $10,712. After subtracting $819 in federal payroll taxes and adding the $4,285 federal EITC for which the family qualifies, the family’s cash income totals $14,178, or $2,064 below the 2006 poverty line for a family of three ($16,242).

• Source: Nagle and Johnson, 2006.

Page 40: January 24, 2008

Who Receives the EITC?

• 5.4 million poor families with able-bodied parents– 3.3 million or 66 percent had at least one parent in

the labor force – Among poor families with children in which one or

both parents worked anytime during the year, the parents worked at combined 44 weeks.

– About 75 percent of the families on welfare (TANF, SSI, or GA) had a parent working in 2004

Page 41: January 24, 2008
Page 42: January 24, 2008

Who Receives the EITC?

Source: Holt, 2006

Page 43: January 24, 2008

Who Receives the EITC?

Source: Holt, 2006

Page 44: January 24, 2008

Who Receives the EITC?

Source: Holt, 2006

Page 45: January 24, 2008

Source: Nagle and Johnson, 2006

How large are the credits?

Page 46: January 24, 2008

Source: Levitis and Johnson, 2006

Page 47: January 24, 2008

Which States supplement the federal credit?

• Nineteen States (counting the District of Columbia as a State) supplement with Federal EITC.

• A campaign is being waged to convince the remaining States to do likewise.

Page 48: January 24, 2008

Source: Okwuje and Johnson, 2006

Page 49: January 24, 2008

Notes for previous table

Page 50: January 24, 2008

Source: Nagle and Johnson, 2006

Page 51: January 24, 2008

Why is the EITC politically popular?

• Encourages work– More people enter the labor force– Workers work more hours

• Reduces welfare costs– Grogger concluded that the EITC “may be the single most

important policy for explaining recent increases in work and earnings and declines in receipt of cash welfare assistance among female-headed families.”Source: Greenstein, 2005

Page 52: January 24, 2008

Why is the EITC politically popular?, Cont.

• Reduces poverty– By 4.4 million in 2003– The poverty rate among children would be

1/4 higher without EITC– Lifts more children out of poverty than any

other program

Page 53: January 24, 2008

Will this popularity last?-- problems with the

EITC• Fraud

– Overpayments to eligibles– Fraudulent claims from ineligibles

• Nonparticipation• Marriage penalty encourages cohabitation

– A two earner, two-child couple making $35,000 (with a 60/40% earnings split) can save $3,923 a year in federal income taxes by avoiding marriage (EITC: $4,400 vs. $476).

Page 54: January 24, 2008

Will this popularity last?-- problems with the

EITC, cont.• High cumulative marginal tax rates

– When earnings are in the phase-out range, the combined marginal tax rates for the may create a substantial work disincentive

• Federal income taxes 15%• Payroll tax 7%• EITC phase-out 21%

– Add a State income tax (3 to 6%) to this 43% marginal tax rate if relevant.

– Add 24% phase-out rate for Food Stamps.– Cumulatively the marginal tax rate face by low-income

Americans is in the range of 43- 73% !