January 13, 2016 NISO Webinar: Ensuring the Scholarly Record: Scholarly Retractions, Scientific...
-
Upload
devonne-parks-cem -
Category
Education
-
view
1.222 -
download
0
Transcript of January 13, 2016 NISO Webinar: Ensuring the Scholarly Record: Scholarly Retractions, Scientific...
NISO WebinarJanuary 13, 2016
Ivan OranskyCo-Founder, Retraction Watch,
The Center For Scientific IntegrityVice President, Global Editorial Director, MedPage Today
Distinguished Writer In Residence, NYU Journalism Institute@ivanoransky
Retractions, Post-Publication Peer Review, and Fraud: Scientific Publishing’s Wild West
Robots No Longer Considered Harmful
I.P. Freely, Oliver Clothesoff, Jacques Strap, Hugh Jazz, Amanda Huginkiss
Is This Science Today?
What Happens to Retracted Papers’ Citations?
Budd et al, 1999: • Retracted articles received more than 2,000 post-
retraction citations; less than 8% of citations acknowledged the retraction
• Preliminary study of the present data shows that continued citation remains a problem
• Of 391 citations analyzed, only 6% acknowledge the retraction
Do Journals Get the Word Out?
“Journals often fail to alert the naïve reader; 31.8% of retracted papers were not noted as retracted in any way.”
Contact Info/AcknowledgementsoransiØ[email protected]
http://retractionwatch.com
@retractionwatch
Thanks:
The MacArthur Foundation
The Arnold Foundation
The Helmsley Trust
Nancy Lapid, Reuters Health