From the Periphery to the Center: Technical Communicators as Experience Architects
Janet Smith Carmen Burth. Why is this Information Important to technical communicators? Foundation...
-
Upload
everett-hardy -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Janet Smith Carmen Burth. Why is this Information Important to technical communicators? Foundation...
Janet SmithCarmen Burth
Why is this Information Important to technical communicators?
Foundation for what we do as technical communicators.
It can distinguish a professional writer from an amateur.
It adds professionalism to our documentation.
Getting the Language Right
Why is this Information Important to users? Ease of Use
• Helps Users do what they want/need to do. Users are generally in a hurry. They turn to the documentation to find answers to problems.
Clarity• We learn and remember easily when there are
patterns and structure. Confidence
• When a document is written this way readers are likely to have greater confidence in the document’s accuracy.
Getting the Language Right
How can we ensure that our documentation is written using performance-oriented language?
It’s very important that we analyze our own writing and revise, revise, revise.
Ask a peer to look at the document. It’s always
good to have another pair of eyes review the document from a fresh perspective.
Use a checklist during your review.
Do your sentences emphasize actions the user can take rather than functions of the program?
Do your sentences use the active voice predominantly?
Have you reviewed your sentences to make sure they have first-reading clarity?
Checklist Cont. Have you avoided overly long and
complicated sentences? Do your sentences contain easy-to-use
parallel phrases? Have you included clarifying operational
overviews in your documents? Do your sentences reflect a performance
orientation?
Analyze your style to make sure you avoid the following problems:
Overused and unexplained acronyms and abbreviations.
Confusing synonyms.
Overlong paragraphs and sentences.
Emphasis on the computer rather than the program.
Checklist Cont. Lack of connection between headings and
topics. Too formal tone. Inappropriate humor. Ambiguous task names. Confusing statements of steps. Omitted article