Jackson County School District
39
Jackson County School District • A overview of test scores and cumulative data from 2001 – 2006 relative to the following: • Mississippi Curriculum Test • Writing Assessment • Subject Area Testing Program
description
Jackson County School District. A overview of test scores and cumulative data from 2001 – 2006 relative to the following: Mississippi Curriculum Test Writing Assessment Subject Area Testing Program. Mississippi Curriculum Test. Administered each May to students in grades 2 – 8 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of Jackson County School District
Jackson County School District
• A overview of test scores and cumulative data from 2001 – 2006 relative to the following:
• Mississippi Curriculum Test • Writing Assessment• Subject Area Testing Program
Mississippi Curriculum Test
• Administered each May to students in grades 2 – 8• Students are tested in the areas of reading, language
arts, and mathematics.• Mean scale score is the average score of all students
tested.• % of students scoring proficient and advanced looks
only at students in the upper quartiles.• Basis for state (Achievement and Growth) and most
of federal (AYP) accountability models. • As mandated by NCLB, by 2014 ALL students MUST
score either proficient or advanced.
JCSD Results
• Based on the results of the 2006 state testing, the JCSD was one of only nine school districts in the state of Mississippi who had ALL schools rated as Level 5 and who met AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress) in ALL subgroups in EVERY school.
Second Grade – A Six Year Look at Growth in Mean Scale Scores
430
440
450
460
470
480
490
500
Reading Lang.Arts
Math
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
• 26.0 scale point increase in Reading 2001 - 2006• 41.6 scale point increase in Language Arts 2001 – 2006. • 29.2 scale point increase in Math 2001 - 2006
Third Grade - A Six Year Look at Growth in Mean Scale Scores
470
480
490
500
510
520
530
540
Reading Lang.Arts
Math
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
• 15.2 scale point increase in Reading 2001 - 2006• 28.7 scale point increase in Language Arts 2001 –
2006• 34.5 scale point increase in Math 2001 - 2006
Fourth Grade – A Six Year Look at Growth in Mean Scale Scores
490
500
510
520
530
540
550
Reading Lang.arts
Math
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
• 11.9 scale point increase in Reading 2001 - 2006• 24.7 scale point increase in Language Arts 2001 – 2006• 23.6 scale point increase in Math 2001 - 2006
Fifth Grade – A Six Year Look at Growth in Mean Scale Scores
510
520
530
540
550
560
570
Reading Lang. arts Math
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
• 10.2 scale point increase in Reading 2001 - 2006• 33.7 scale point increase in Language Arts 2001 – 2006. • 20.8 scale point increase in Math 2001 - 2006
Sixth Grade – A Six Year Look at Growth
in Mean Scale Scores
510
520
530
540
550
560
570
580
590
Reading Lang.arts Math
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
• 7.8 scale point increase in Reading 2001 - 2006• 20.8 scale point increase in Language Arts 2001 – 2006. • 20.6 scale point increase in Math 2001 – 2006
Seventh Grade – A Six Year Look at Growth in Mean Scale Scores
520
530
540
550
560
570
580
590
600
Reading Lang. arts Math
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
• 8.2 scale point increase in Reading 2001 - 2006• 11.6 scale point increase in Language Arts 2001 – 2006. • 23.5 scale point increase in Math 2001 - 2006
Eighth Grade – A Six Year Look at Growth in Mean Scale Scores
520
530
540
550
560
570
580
590
600
610
620
Reading Lang. arts Math
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
• 1.6 scale point increase in Reading 2001 - 2006• 5.2 scale point increase in Language Arts 2001 – 2006. • 17.8 scale point increase in Math 2001 - 2006
Second Grade – Percentages of Students Scoring Proficient and Advanced –
Six Year Trend8
6.9
94 94
93
95
94
.3
0
20
40
60
80
100
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Reading
76.5 87 88 91 91 91
0
20
40
60
80
100
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Lang. Arts
93 9
8 97
98 98
96
.7
0
20
40
60
80
100
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Math
Third Grade – Percentages of Students Scoring Proficient and Advanced –
Six Year Trend8
8.6 9
2
91 92 92
94
.6
0
20
40
60
80
100
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Reading
75.3 80 88
89 94
92.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
89.7 94 96 98
97 98.2
0
20
40
60
80
100
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Math
Fourth Grade – Percentages of Students Scoring Proficient and Advanced –
Six Year Trend9
0.5
95 96
96
97
92
.70
20
40
60
80
100
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Reading
68.1
87
82 84 88
86.8
0
20
40
60
80
100
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Lang. Arts
80
.8
90
90 91
91
92
.2
0
20
40
60
80
100
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Math
Fifth Grade – Percentages of Students Scoring Proficient and Advanced –
Six Year Trend9
0
93 96
96 95
92
.20
20
40
60
80
100
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Reading
71.3 77 83 83 85
85.6
0
20
40
60
80
100
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Lang. Arts7
6.6
80 84
85 86
86
.9
0
20
40
60
80
100
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Math
Sixth Grade – Percentages of Students Scoring Proficient and Advanced –
Six Year Trend8
2.6
82 8
6
89
88
85
.20
20
40
60
80
100
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Reading
59.8
64
73 72 78
75.1
0
20
40
60
80
100
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Lang. Arts6
6.4 77
77 83
80
84
.1
0
20
40
60
80
100
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Math
Seventh Grade – Percentages of Students Scoring Proficient and Advanced –
Six Year Trend6
9.8
73 77
76
75
76
.10
20
40
60
80
100
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Reading
54.5 61 62
74
64
66.2
0
20
40
60
80
100
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Lang. Arts
54 62 7
2 76 78
76
.7
0
20
40
60
80
100
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Math
Eighth Grade – Percentages of Students Scoring Proficient and Advanced –
Six Year Trend6
9.4
55 6
9
79
73
68
.60
20
40
60
80
100
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Reading
56.3
48
65
61 67 59.9
0
20
40
60
80
100
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Lang. Arts5
7.9 61 6
9 80
73
74
.2
0
20
40
60
80
100
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Math
Cohort Groups (Analyzing the same students from year to year…..
or comparing apples to apples!)
Longitudinal Data 2003 – 2006 2nd – 5th Grade
468.
7
48
7.6
502.
7
51
9.8
519.
1
53
9.3 54
2.6
56
5.7
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2ndGrade2003
3rdGrade2004
4thGrade2005
5thGrade2006
MS JCSD
452.
748
6.4 50
051
9.4
521.
953
9.3 544
565.
4
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2ndGrade2003
3rdGrade2004
4thGrade2005
5thGrade2006
MS JCSD
46
7.8
48
6.8
49
5.1
51
0.7
51
1.6
53
2.7
52
7.3
54
4.3
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2ndGrade2003
3rdGrade2004
4thGrade2005
5thGrade2006
MS JCSD
Cohort Groups Cont. 3rd Grade – 6th Grade
2003 - 2006
49
5
508
51
9.1
537.
8
53
6.3
557
.9
54
1.9
557.
6
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
3rdGrade2003
4thGrade2004
5thGrade2005
6thGrade2006
MS JCSD
494
513.
4
521.
353
7.7
540.
956
2.1
562.
158
0.3
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
3rdGrade2003
4thGrade2004
5thGrade2005
6thgrade2006
MS JCSD
48
8.8
50
7.3
51
1.2
52
8.5
52
7.4
54
7.3 53
5.2
54
9.5
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
3rdGrade2003
4th grade2004
5thGrade2005
6thGrade2006
MS JCSD
Cohort Group4th Grade – 7th Grade
2003 - 2006
51
0.4 5
30
.6
53
4.5
54
6.2
54
4.4
55
9.3
55
0.2
55
9
460
480
500
520
540
560
580
600
4rhGrade2003
5thGrade2004
6thGrade2005
7theGrade2006
MS JCSD
452.
748
6.4 50
051
9.4
521.
953
9.3
573.
159
4.4
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
4thGrade2003
5thGrade2004
6thGrade2005
7thGrade2006
MS JCSD
50
8.1 52
8.9
52
6.4
54
1.3
53
0.6
54
7.2
54
2.3 5
58
.7
460
480
500
520
540
560
580
600
4thGrade2003
5thGrade2004
6thGrade2005
7thGrade2006
MS JCSD
Cohort Group 5th Grade – 8th Grade
2003 - 2006
52
9.4 54
4.4
53
8.3
549.
5
55
2.9
564.
2
55
8.7
566.
9
480
500
520
540
560
580
600
5thGrade2003
6thGrade2004
7thGrade2005
8thGrade2006
MS JCSD
535.
955
5.7
565 57
8.4
573.
559
3.4
590.
860
8.8
500
520
540
560
580
600
5thGrade2003
6thgrade2004
7thGrade2005
8thGrade2006
MS JCSD
52
7.2 54
4.9
53
5.3 54
9
54
5.2
55
8.8 56
0.1 57
2.6
480
500
520
540
560
580
600
5thGrade2003
6thGrade2004
7thGrade2005
8thGrade2006
MS JCSD
Writing Assessment
• Administered each March to students in grades 4 and 7.
• Students receive a score of 1 – 4 based on writing proficiency shown on a writing prompt.
Subject Area Tests
• Subject Area Tests are administered in the following areas:
* Algebra I
* English II (multiple choice and 1 writing prompt - informative * Biology
* United States History
More on SATP
• Students must pass all subject area tests in order to obtain a high school diploma.
• Students not passing any assessment will be given three opportunities to be retested.
• The 2001 administration of the SATP did not count towards graduation; therefore, a percentage of pass/fail was not included for that year.
Algebra 1 Data Comparison
Mean Scores ~ Pass RateMS and JCSD
33
9.9
36
6.2
35
2.3
37
9.4
35
5.2
38
1.3
35
2.2
37
4.5
310
320
330
340
350
360
370
380
390
2003 2004 2005 2006
MS
JCSD
81.9
92
.3
90.7
97
.7
91.3
97
.7
919
5.5
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
2003 2004 2005 2006
MS
JCSD
English II Data Comparison
Mean Scores ~ Pass RateMS and JCSD
33
03
40
.3
33
4.5
34
4.5
33
2.9
34
2.1
33
0.2
33
9.6
320
325
330
335
340
345
2003 2004 2005 2006
MS
JCSD
85
.2 85
.2
83
.1
90
.3
82
89
.1
78
.1
87
.3
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
2003 2004 2005 2006
MS
JCSD
BiologyData Comparison
Mean Scores ~ Pass RateMS and JCSD
35
2
37
5
35
6.8
37
9.5
36
0.7
39
1
36
2.3
38
5.1
330
340
350
360
370
380
390
400
2003 2004 2005 2006
MS
JCSD
86
.5
92
.3
89
.2 97
.7
91
.4 97
.7
93
.3 99
.3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2003 2004 2005 2006
MS
JCSD
U.S. History Data Comparison
Mean Scores ~ Pass RateMS and JCSD
36
3
37
4.5
36
6.3
38
2.7
36
5.6
38
4
36
5.7
37
8.6
350
355
360
365
370
375
380
385
2003 2004 2005 2006
MS
JCSD
94.3
97
.9 95.7
98
.8
91.3
99
95.9
98
.6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2003 2004 2005 2006
MS
JCSD
English II Writing AssessmentInformative
Mean Score Pass Rate2
.22
.2 2.1
2.1 2.1 2
.3
22
.2
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
2003 2004 2005 2006
MS
JCSD
94.1
94.4
89.2
88.3
90.2 94
.7
93.7
97
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2003 2004 2005 2006
MS
JCSD
Mississippi Science Test
• Administered to students in grades 5 and 8• These tests are aligned with the Mississippi Science
Framework 2001 and contains all multiple choice items with varying degrees of difficulty.
• The tests are summative. That is the assessment covers grades 3 – 5 of the grade 5 test and grades 6 – 8 on the grade 8 test.
• A field test was administered in 2005. • The first operational administration will take place in
March 2007. Standard setting will take place in June 2007. Results will be reported in late summer 2007.
• Beginning in 2008 all results will be distributed no later than June 15.
NAEP
• The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) is a congressionally mandated project overseen by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) to continuously monitor the knowledge, skills, and performance of the nation’s children and youth.
“Nation’s Report Card”
• As the “Nation’s Report Card,” NAEP has measured and reported on a regular basis what America’s fourth, eighth, and twelfth graders know and can do since 1969.
NAEP Data
• NAEP provides objective data about students’ performance at national, regional, and, as of 1990, state levels in reading, writing, mathematics, science, U.S. history, civics, geography, the arts, and other subjects.
NAEP Assessments
• Who takes NAEP assessments?• Federal law requires all states that receive
Title I funds participate in NAEP reading and mathematics assessments at 4th and 8th grades.
• Schools that represent the demographics of the state are selected to participate; students within the schools are selected randomly.
NAEP Schedule
January 22 to March 2, 2007 NAEPassessments will be administered.• Reading and Math (Grades 4 and 8)• Writing (Grade 8 and Grade 12)
• ECUE, ECMS and SMHS (8th Grade only) will participate in NAEP testing this spring.
NAEP Scores
• 2007 NAEP Mathematics and Reading results should be available in the fall of 2007.
• It is important to remember that no student scores or school scores or district scores are generated–only state scores for grades 4 and 8 and only national scores for grade 12.
Where do we go from here?
• Continue developing/refining curriculum pacing guides and common assessments to insure ALL students are held to the very highest standards. District assessments are currently given every 4 ½ weeks.
• Analyze data in a very deliberate manner to insure that students having difficulty with any skill are identified and remediated in a timely manner.
• Continue implementation of new computer based learning programs aimed at improving scores of targeted subgroups. (i.e. NovaNet, FastForward,
Compass Learning, etc.)
Steps to insure an increase in student achievement cont.
• All schools have identified each and every student who scored minimal or basic on the 2006 MCT. These students are receiving additional help through a wide range of services (i.e before and after school tutorial services)
• Schools have also identified students scoring in the lower 25% of the proficient range. These students are also given extra support to insure that they do show a decrease on the MCT.
• Students in need of assistance were identified not only as individuals, but also as members of their NCLB subgroup. This will aid in insuring that ALL subgroups meet Adequate Yearly Progress.
Conclusion
• The goal of the JSCD is to have 100% of students scoring either proficient and advanced BEFORE 2014.
• We will achieve this goal by showing sustained growth over time with all student groups.
