JAA TGL 10 Explained D J Hawkes UK CAA RNAV in European Terminal Airspace Workshop.

JAA TGL 10 Explained

D J Hawkes UK CAA

RNAV in European Terminal Airspace Workshop

http://www.ecacnav.com/p-rnav/default.htm

http://www.ecacnav.com/p-rnav/default.htm

RNAV in European Terminal Airspace oint Aviation Authorities

22 of 34

Joint Aviation Regulation OPS 1.243 Operations in areas with specific navigation performance requirements:

An operator shall not operate an aeroplane in…specified airspace…where minimum navigation performance specifications are prescribed unless …approved to do so by the authority.

JAROPS

http://www.eurocontrol.int/


33 of 34

Joint Aviation Regulations

OPS 1.865 … requires the aircraft to be “…equipped with … navigation equipment in accordance with the requirements of air traffic services in the area(s) of operation”; and “An area navigation system where area navigation is required for the route being flown”. OPS 1.630 … requires instruments and equipment to be approved.



44 of 34

Guidance Leaflet No. 10

Published by JAA on 1st November 2000 to support the European P-RNAV strategy.

Supplemented by FAQs published April 2003.

AIRWORTHINESS AND OPERATIONAL APPROVAL FOR PRECISION RNAV OPERATIONS

IN DESIGNATED EUROPEAN AIRSPACE


TGL-10 Main Topics

P-RNAV System Description

Airspace Assumptions

Performance Criteria

Required Functions

Airworthiness Compliance

Flight CrewProcedures

Flight Manual

Crew Training

Operations Manuals

Database Integrity


66 of 34

Assumptions- about P-RNAV

The design of terminal P-RNAV procedures: • is consistent with the relevant parts of

ICAO Doc 8168 PANS OPS ; • follow the guidelines of EUROCONTROL

document NAV.ET1.ST10;• is based upon WGS 84 co‑ordinates;• is validated and shown to be aircraft

compatible.



77 of 34

Further Assumptions

• Fix data is provided on charts to assist integrity checking by the flight crew;

• NOTAMs for non-availability of a procedure;• Where needed to address specific hazards,

dual P-RNAV systems is stated in the AIP; • The AIP addresses radar service if needed;• RT phraseology for P-RNAV has been

promulgated;• Non ICAO compliant navigation aids are

excluded from the AIP, e.g. TACAN.



88 of 34

Aircraft Systems for P-RNAV

P-RNAV may be based the following types of sensor to give lateral navigation along a path defined by waypoints from on-board navigation database:

– Distance Measuring Equipment using two or more beacons (DME/DME);

– Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS);– Co-located VOR/DME provided the

requirements of the procedure are met. – Inertial Systems (INS or IRS) with automatic

radio updating.



99 of 34

Other Aircraft Systems

• LORAN C is not an acceptable sensor;• VNAV capability is optional;• The navigation database may hold

TACAN data to supplement DME provided the TACAN beacon meets ICAO Annex 10 Standards and is listed in the AIP.



1010 of 34

System Performance- Accuracy

• The lateral track keeping accuracy of the on-board P-RNAV system shall be equal to or better than +/- 1 NM for 95% of the flight time.

• Track keeping accuracy depends on the navigation system error (a combination of path definition error, position estimation error and display error), and the Flight Technical Error (FTE). It corresponds to the accuracy component of RNP-1 and RNP-1 RNAV.



1111 of 34

Meeting the accuracy requirement- GPS

• For manual flight, a default FTE of 0.8 NM may be assumed (ref. RTCA DO-283, 2.2.5.1).

• For GPS, provided the path definition and display errors are negligible, manual flight using GPS can achieve the required accuracy.

• For non-GPS cases, positioning error is more significant, so flight director or autopilot is necessary to reduce FTE and to achieve the required accuracy.

• Also, a suitable map display can reduce FTE.



1212 of 34

• RNAV systems using DME/DME and compliant with the 2D navigation accuracy criteria of FAA AC 90-45A, AC 20-130(), FAA TSO-C115(), or JAA JTSO-2C115(), can be used for P-RNAV procedures meeting the published criteria without further evaluation of system accuracy.

• However, compliance with all other criteria of TGL 10 will need to be shown.

Meeting the accuracy requirement- DME/DME



1313 of 34

Evidence of meeting accuracy criteria

Options include:• A Flight Manual statement;• A statement from the aircraft constructor;• A statement from the equipment installer;• An assessment report.

Refer to TGL 10 for acceptable equipment performance standards.



1414 of 34

System Performance- Integrity

• The probability of displaying hazardously misleading navigational or positional information simultaneously to both pilots shall be Remote, as defined in JAR 25.1309.

• For P-RNAV in the terminal area, hazardous should be interpreted as involving misleading information without a timely warning and which, in the absence of other cues, is unlikely to be detected by the flight crew.



1515 of 34

Meeting the integrity requirement

• The integrity requirements applied at initial aircraft build for primary navigation systems are the same as those for P-RNAV, no further investigation is required.

• Compliance may be claimed on the basis of the original certification.

• For modified aircraft, a statement should be sought from the equipment installer.



1616 of 34

System Performance- Continuity of Function

• For the on-board systems, it shall be shown that:

• The probability of loss of all navigation information is Remote*.

• The probability of non-restorable loss of all navigation and communication functions is Extremely Improbable*.

• * as defined in JAR 25.1309.



1717 of 34

Meeting Continuity of Function criteria

• In addition to the equipment required by JAR-OPS 1, Sub-part L for IFR flight (or equivalent national requirements), at least one area navigation system is required.


Required Functions for P-RNAV


1919 of 34

Objectives

• P-RNAV capability;• Appropriate controls and displays

to avoid confusion and crew errors;• Low crew workload compatible

with TMA operations;• Monitoring provisions;• Failure indications.


2020 of 34

TGL 10 Table 1: Required functions

• System display requirements;• Parameters to be displayed;• Use of the navigation database;• Auto-tuning and navaid selection;• Automatic leg sequencing;• Fly-over and fly-by turns;• Use of ARINC 424 path terminators;• Automatic reversion after primary nav

sensor failure.


2121 of 34

Specific issues- Course Selection

• Automatic course selection slaved to the RNAV computed path is necessary to ensure accurate track keeping with an acceptable crew workload during a complex P-RNAV procedure.

• Automatic selection will be required for all new installations.

• If this function is not provided in existing installations, track keeping & crew workload will need to be assessed on a case-by-case basis.


2222 of 34

Specific issues- Deviation Scaling

• The deviation display shall have a full-scale deflection suitable for the phase of flight and the required track keeping accuracy.

• Scaling may be set automatically to a default value, or obtained from a database.

• The full-scale deflection value must be known or made available for display to the flight crew.

• For P-RNAV operations, a value of ±1 NM is acceptable.


2323 of 34

Specific issues- MAGVAR

• To ensure accurate navigation, the magnetic variation tables held in the system (e.g. IRS or FMC or Navigation computer) need to be current.

• Updates should be requested from the equipment supplier.


2424 of 34

Specific issues- Dual Systems and Intermixing of equipment

• For approach operations, to avoid problems of conflicting methods of operation and conflicting display formats, intermixing of RNAV equipment is not permitted.

• The following must be consistent:— Units and notation of displayed data; — Display Symbology — CDI scaling; — Databases;

— Data entry; — Mode logic; — mode annunciation;


2525 of 34

TGL 10 Table 2: Recommended functions

• Parallel offset paths;• Autopilot/Flight Director* coupling;• VNAV;• Automatic runway position update;• Additional ARINC 424 path terminators;

* May be required to obtain low Flight Technical Error to meet accuracy requirement.


2626 of 34

Airworthiness Compliance- New installations

• Submit a compliance statement to your authority that shows how the criteria of TGL 10 have been satisfied. Address:– Equipment qualification;– System safety analysis;– Software assurance level;– Performance Analyses;– System failure scenarios;– Human interface;– Autopilot/Flight Director coupling;– Execution of leg types.

JAR 25 ACJ 25hgdfjhgjkdhg

kj

fvkjfdhvjkhfjk

lkjfjkhjjljknjlkn

hjuhgdfjhgjkdhgkjfvkjfdhvjkhfjklkjfjkhjjljknjlkn


2727 of 34

Airworthiness Compliance- Existing Installations

• Submit a compliance statement to your own authority that shows how the criteria of TGL 10 have been satisfied. Compliance may be established by inspection of the installed system to confirm the availability of required features and functionality.

• The performance and integrity criteria may be confirmed by reference to statements in the Aircraft Flight Manual or to other applicable approvals and supporting certification data.


2828 of 34

Aircraft Flight Manual- new or modified aircraft

If a description of the installed system with related operating instructions and procedures are available in other approved operating or training manuals, the AFM may need only the following information:

–A statement which identifies the equipment and aircraft build or modification standard certificated for P-RNAV operations with an RNP-1 or better capability.


2929 of 34

AFM- Existing aircraft

If the AFM or Pilot’s Operating Handbook is unclear about the system capability, the operator has one of the following options: • Obtain a Change Sheet or Supplement

from the aircraft constructor.

• Propose an AFM Supplement based on the template shown in TGL 10, Annex E; or

• Propose an Operational Specification giving information equivalent to that in an AFM.


3030 of 34

Operational Criteria

• An operational evaluation will need to confirm the adequacy of normal and contingency procedures for the particular equipment installation.

• Operational approval will be stated in the applicable Air Operator Certificate, or issued in accordance with national procedures, as appropriate.


3131 of 34

Flight Crew Procedures & Training

TGL 10 provides advice on:– Pre-flight Planning;– Database checks;– Departure;– Flight progress monitoring;– Arrival;– Contingency Procedures;– Incident Reporting;– Contents of training manuals.


3232 of 34

Navigation Databases

• The navigation database should be obtained from an approved supplier who has complied with EUROCAE/RTCA document ED-76/DO-200A, Standards for Processing Aeronautical Data.

• Until such approved suppliers become available, as a minimum, the operator must implement integrity checks to verify data relating to waypoints below the applicable minimum obstacle clearance altitude.


3333 of 34

Cautionary Note

This presentation is a compressed overview of published regulatory material.

Delegates should consult the latest publications of national authorities for details of applicable

policies, requirements and guidance material.

Enquiries relating to the certification of aircraft systems, or to operational approvals, should be made to the applicant’s own national authority.


3434 of 34

d3

www.JAA.nlwww.EASA.EU.int

www.ECACNAV.comwww.EUROCAE.org

JAA TGL 10 Explained D J Hawkes UK CAA RNAV in European Terminal Airspace Workshop.

Documents

Transcript of JAA TGL 10 Explained D J Hawkes UK CAA RNAV in European Terminal Airspace Workshop.