IWBs are one of the fastest growing technologies in education today. IWBs help differentiate...

17
Interactive White Boards Reaching and Teaching

Transcript of IWBs are one of the fastest growing technologies in education today. IWBs help differentiate...

Interactive White Boards

Interactive White BoardsReaching and Teaching

Integration Map

The TechnologyIWBs are one of the fastest growing technologies in education today.IWBs help differentiate instruction.IWBs are proven effective even when other methods fail.

The Linkshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0U05WeXPGlk

Elementary teacher and students show interaction and ease of use.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjdNPMZJbLs

Middle School Social Studies demonstration

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lQt5AgV9fQ

Demonstration of integration of other technologies with IWBs (brief)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwE25dx2CaU

How to make your own 3D books!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTFEUsudhfs Not To Be Missed! Salman Khan explains how to use technology to teach math.

The LearnersLD, ID, ADD, OHINeed supportsNeed interactionNeed validationNeed engagement

Typically served in a small group, self-contained setting or collaborative classroom.

Comparing Interactive Whiteboards can:Engage learners more effectivelySustain attention longerBe more student centeredFacilitate collaborationAddress higher level thinking skillsProduce a greater increase in student achievement

IWBs vs. OverheadsInteractive White BoardsCan interface with other technologiesEngages studentsSustains attentionEncourages collaborationStudent centeredMulti-modalAccess to the world wide webAccesses higher thinking levels Uses instructional softwareOverhead projectorsCan not interfaceLittle capacity for engagementShorter attentionLittle or no collaborationTeacher centeredFlat images onlyNo access to the world wide webDoes not have the creative aids for higher levels of skillsCan not use instructional software.

The ASSURE ModelAnalyze Learners

State Standards and Objectives

Select Strategies, Technology, Media, and Materials

Utilize Technology, Media and Materials

Require Learner Participation

Evaluate and Revise

Evaluation2 ConsiderationsEvaluation of Technology Was it student centered?Did it engage students?Were student needs met?Was it reliable?Evaluation of Student LearningDid student attention increase?Did student participation increase?Did student competency increase?

ResearchWhat we know :

As presentation hardware, IWBs are superior to existing technology such as an overhead projector because of their capacity to interface with other technologies such as the computer, ipad, tablet, or smart phone. When one considers what this means in terms of what it can bring into the classroom, there is little in the way of comparison. IWBs are capable of engaging students in complex, meaningful, goal-directed learning activities (Kuo & Hsiao, 2013). Students can be active in the processes of collaboration, discussion, creativity, and performance through a medium which addresses all learning styles rather than just a view of projected 2D notes (Thomas & Schmid, 2010) (Salton & Arslan, 2009).

ResearchWhen used appropriately, the IWB can be much more student centered than traditional presentations which are teacher centered (Howland, Johnassen, & Marra, 2013). For example, students can be involved in creating and sharing videos for demonstrations of how to solve math problems which is a much higher level skill than merely observing the teacher demonstrate a formula and/or choosing an answer from a list of choices.ResearchFor the population under consideration, IWBs can serve as a far less stressful and more successful form of evaluation than traditional tests, which typically result in failure. IWBs are more successful student engagement, and holding the attention and interest which is a major concern in working with students with special needs. IWBs can significantly increase student achievement. (Clemens, Moore, & Nelson, 2010). IWBs can help in cases where the use of traditional methods are failing (Dostal, 2011).

ReflectionsThrough this project, I have learned a great deal about using IWBs, as well as WHY they should be used.

ReflectionsApplications

References

Interactive White Boards This presentation was prepared by Jannet L. White

Strayer UniversitySummer 2014

Dr. Peter Dedominici