ITEM: E SANJOSE Memorandum€¦ · California Police Chiefs Association) ... Executive Director of...
Transcript of ITEM: E SANJOSE Memorandum€¦ · California Police Chiefs Association) ... Executive Director of...
RULES COMMITTEE: 10-03-07 ITEM: E
~CITYOF
SANJOSE Memorandum CAPITAL 01' SILICON VALLEY
TO: .Honorable Mayor & City Council Members
FROM: Lee Price, MMC City Clerk
SUBJECT: The Public Record September 21-26,2007
DATE: September 27,2007
ITEMS TRANSMITTED TO THE ADMINISTRATION
ITEMS FILED. FOR THE PUBLIC RECORD
(a) Response memo from City Manager Debra Figone to City Attorney's Office Staff dated September 24,2007 regarding retiree healthcare.
(b) Letter from TMobile to City Clerk Lee Price dated September 19,2007 regarding ocr Site Number SF24681 San Jose Light Pole 6.
(c) Memo from Mayor Reed to Sunshine Reform Task Force copies of three letters (California Narcotic Officers' Association, California Peace Officers' Association, and California Police Chiefs Association) regarding their work on police records.
(d) Letter from Association of Bay Area Governments to the Mayor, Councilmembers, and City Clerk regarding notice of election of the president and vice president of the Association of Bay Area Governments.
(e) Notice of Applicant ofAnteneh G. Lakew dba Paradise Valley Shuttle was filed with the California Public Utilities Commission on September 12, 2007.
(f) Email from Joanne Benjamin, Executive Director of Santa Clara County Cities Association to City Clerk Lee Price received on September 23,2007 call for applications: Climate Protection Grants.
(g) Email from Joanne Benjamin, Executive Director of Santa Clara County Cities Association to City Clerk Lee Price received on September 23, 2007 regarding three upcoming appointments to positions on regional level boards and commissions.
Lee Price, MMC City Clerk
LP/np
P{AhL{~ !.?t(!(}/)C( 0c CITYOF ~
SAN]OSE Memorandum' CAPJ'D\L OF SILICON VAl.LEY
TO: City Attorney's Office Staff FROM: Debra Figone (See Distribution)
SUBJECT: Retiree Healthcare DATE: September 24, 2007
I received your communication regarding the references to retiree healthcare benefits in the Unit 99 Benefit and Compensation Summary. The summary reflects the Council's direction of August 28, 2007, to engage stakeholders, including the Executive Management (Unit 99) Forum, in identifying the strategies and alternatives to address the City's unfunded liability for retiree healthcare.
We understand the concern of all City employees about the retiree healthcare issue. .It is a significant challenge facing not only the City of San Jose, but many government agencies. Our plan has been, and will continue to be, to engage stakeholders in a collaborative fashion to come up with strategies and alternatives to address the cost to employees and the City for retiree healthcare benefits. These will be presented to the City Council this fiscal year.
The employees in Unit 99 are a key group of executive management and professional employees. We will need to count on the leadership of this group of employees to play an integral role in helping the City meet the challenges facing us in the next several years.
These challenges are not easy and require us to have difficult conversations. I look forward to hearing your ideas and suggestions. Please feel free to pass along your ideas directly or through our meetings with the Executive Management Forum.
c: Mayor and City Council Rick Doyle, City Attorney
Distribution: Brian Doyle Michael Groves Jennifer Pousho Tom Murtha Ken Johnson Joseph DiCiuccio Michael J. Dodson Suzanne Felkner' Daisy Nishigaya
-Robert Fabela Richard Brennen Angelique Gaeta Nkia D. Richardson Thomas Alston Karin Murabito Margo Laskowska Shannon Smyth-Mendoza Rosa Tsongtaatarii Norma L. Acosta Sandra Lee Carl B. Mitchell Paul D. Ahn Ellen Donnelly Mollie Dent Vera M. I. Todorov J. Ken Mower Barbara Jordan Clifford Greenberg Mark DeCastro Glenn Schwarzbach Brian C. Hopper Johnny V. Phan
II III •®-Mobile
September 19,2007
City Clerk Lee Price 200 Santa Clara St., 7th Floor San Jose, CA 95133
Re: OCI Site Number SF24681 San Jose Light Pole 6
Dear Ms. Price,
General Order 159-A (GO-159-A) of the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) requires cellular carriers to send a notification letter of a utility's intent to construct a cellular facility to CPUC's Safety and Enforcement Division within 15 business days of receipt of all requisite local land use approvals. The notification letter shall state that such approvals have been received, or that no land use approvals are required.
As set forth in GO 159-A, copies of the notification letter are required to be served concurrently by mail on the local governmental agency. Where the affected local governmental agency is a city, service of the notification letter to the city shall consist of service of separate copies of the notification letter upon the City Manager, the City Planning Director and the City Clerk. m order to comply with these requirements, I have enclosed a copy of the notification letter for our project within your city limits.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Rod De La Rosa at (925) 521-5948.
Renee Davis Compliance Consultant Ornnipoint Communications mc.
Attachments
T-Mobile USA, Inc. Office: (925) 521-5500 Fax: (925) 521·5501 1855 Gateway Blvd., Suite 900 Concord, CA 94520
· · · · ~ · ·Mobile·® ATTACHMENT A
1. Project Location:
Site Identification Number:
Site Name:
Site Address:
County:
Site Location:
Assessor's Parcel Number:
Latitude: NAD 83
Longitude: NAD 83
2. Project Description:
Number of Antennas to be installed:
Tower Design:
Tower Appearance:
Tower Height:
A) Structure Height
B) Top of antenna Height
BUilding Size(s):
SF24681
San Jose Light Pole 6
6102 Glen Harbor
Santa Clara
San Jose
N/A (City ROW)
37 14 14.7 N
1214912.6 W
1
Light Standard
Light Standard
30.7'
30.7'
N/A
3. Business addresses of all Governmental Agencies
City of San Jose 200 Santa Clara Street, yth Floor San Jose, CA 95133
4. Land Use Approval:
N/A
5. If Land Use approval was not required: Explain reason for exemption and attach documentationfrom the jurisdiction (i.e. copy ofordinance) that officially states exemption:
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT, NO LAND USE APPROVAL REQUIRED
T-Mobile USA, Inc. Office: (925) 521-5500
9/115'1X)~{Wi21-5501 '1'8~I~way Blvd., Suite 900 Concord, CA 94520
· •· · tF · ·Mobile·® September 19,2007
Safety & Enforcement Division California Public Utilities Commission 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 RE: OCI Site Number SF24681 San Jose Light Pole 6
This is to provide the Commission with notice pursuant to the provisions of General Order No. 159A of the Public Utilities Commission ofthe State of California ("CPUC") that:
(a) The cellular company has obtained all requisite land use approval for the project described in Attachment A.
eYlCX" cuchmeAt-_X_ _ (b) That no land use approval is required because -fer rn(-r-A copy of this notification is also being provided to the appropriate local governmental agency for its information. Should there be any questions regarding this project, or if you disagree with any of the information contained herein, please contact. Rod DeLaRosa at (925) 521-5948 ofOmnipoint Communications, Inc. dba T-Mobile, USA corporate identification number U-3056-C.
Renee Davis Compliance Consultant
c:City of San Jose
T-Mobile USA, Inc. Office: (925) 521-5500 Fax: (925) 521-5501 1855 Gateway Blvd., Suite 900 Concord, CA 94520
CITYOF ~ SAN]OSE Memorandum CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY
TO: Sunshine Reform Task Force FROM: Mayor Chuck Reed
SUBJECT: See Below DATE: September 20,2007
APproved~ ~Q Date c=t {Lor 01
Enclosed are copies of three letters I received today regarding your work on police records.
Cc: City Council City Clerk City Manager
CaliforniaNarcotic Officers' President
JOHN AVILA Association Fresno Co. S.D.
1st Vice President RUDY TAl
San Diego P.D.
2nd Vice President GIL VAN ATTENHOVEN
DOJ Sacramento
3rd Vice President BOBBY HERNANDEZ San Bernardino Co. S.D.
4th Vice President JAMES C. HODGES
Alameda Co. S.D.
Seigeoiit a~ AnTis RICK SERRATO
Santa Ana P.D.
Executive Director ROBERT G. HUSSEY. Los Angeles Co. S.D. (ret)
General Counsel BRUCE WOLFE
Van Nuys
Director of Training JAMES AUMOND Orange Co. D.A. (ret)
Legislative Counsel JOHN LOVELL
Sacramento
Conference Chairperson MICHEAL KENNEDY
San Luis Obispo D.A.
Legislative Chairperson ROBERT Elsberg
DOJ San FranciscolNDIC
Region I Chairperson ANTHONY MUNOZ
Alameda P.D.
Region /I Chairperson JORGE GIL·BLANCO WSINIRancho Cordova
Region III Chairperson JAMES ROYER
Hawthorne P.D.
Region IV Chairperson STEVE RIDDLE
San Diego P.D.
Region V Chairperson James Ellis
CDC-Ironwood State Prison
Region VI Chairperson MARK RITCHIE Ventura Co. S.D.
Region VII' Chairperson RACHEL CAPELLO
DOJIBNE Fresno
Region VIII Chairperson RONALD PROSE DOJIBNE Redding
Immediate Past President MICHAEL KENNEDY
San Luis Obispo D.A.
28245 AVENUE CROCKERSTE 230 - SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA 91355-1201
(661) 775-6960· (877) 775-NARC • FAX (661) 775-1648
WWW.CNOA.ORG
September 17,2007
Honorable Chuck Reed Mayor of the City of San Jose San Jose City Hall 200 East Santa Clara Street San Jose, CA 95113
Dear Mayor Reed:
The California Narcotic Officers Association is strongly opposed to the proposed "Sunshine" recommendations that are currently before the San Jose City Council. Our organization is made up of over 7000 law enforcement professionals throughout California who are charged with the responsibility of enforcing the state's controlled substance laws. It's very dangerous work - over 80 names on the Peace Officers' Memorial Wall in Sacramento are CNOA members. Included among those 80 names are two past presidents of CNOA.
Much of our work involves the use of undercover officers and the inadvertent disclosure of the identity of one ofthose individuals is more than embarrassment, it is more than a chilling effect, it can result in their death. Although no one would deliberately disclose the name of an undercover officer, it is inevitable that the broad brush disclosure required by this proposal would result in mistakes being made - mistakes that could have tragic consequences. This is a risk we do not believe is justified by any potential countervailing benefit - particularly when the
. California Public Records Act already provides ample disclosure ofall manner ofpublic documents.
We believe that these recommendations are well-intentioned, but it is equally clear that they were developed by persons with little first-hand knowledge of police procedures and the risks associated with much ofpolice work. CNOA respectfully requests that you decline to approve this proposal.
Sincerely,
John Avila President
CNOA"FOR BETTER NARCOTIC ENFORCEMENT"
California Peace Officers' Association 1-1-55 Response Road. Suite 190. Sacramento. CA 95815
(916) 263-05-1-1 FA.\' (916) 263-6090 E-maiL cpo~u:icpoa.org Website: ,yww.cpoa.org
September 17,2007
Honorable Chuck Reed Mayor of the City of San Jose S;w Jose City Hall 200 East Santa Clara Street San Jose. CA 951 13
Dear Mayor Reed:
The California Peace Officers' Association represents the entire scope of the law enforcement profession. Our membership includes sheriffs. chiefs of police. COllllillllld staff at aU jurisdictional1eYels. as weB as rank: and file members. We haye examined the proposed Sunshine ordinance that will be considered by your City Coullcil 011 September 20 and ,,,ould respectfully request that you decline to adopt it.
Put simply. CPOA believes that this ordinance 'Yill compromise the fundamental public safety mission: place officers. witnesses, and citizen by-standers at risk expose those ,,,ho are detennined not to ltaye conllllitted a crune to the same public opprobriulU as if they had: all without adnmcing any public policy objectiYes tItat are not already protected by the California Public Records Act.
To fully protect the public. law enforcement depends on the confidence of the conllllUnity that they '''ill be protected. That confidence is undemuned if the names of citizens can be freely disclosed to the yery people about whose crinunal conduct they are complaining. As lught follm"s day. an oyerbroad reporting requirement as contemplated by this proposal will haye a chilling effect on citizen participation and will canse a decline Ul citizen confidence in law enforcemenfs ability to protect them. Ironically, tillS proposal will also punish those ,,,110 may llaye been initially suspected of a crime. but rn.Y~ lllti.J1!.~.t~Jy ~~~!l.
determined to be blameless. The disclosure of their name in connection with a criminal lllYestigatioll 'Yill be the type of comnnuuty scarlet letter that will be accessed by landlords and employers and will un£1irly disadnmtage tIlem.
Our organization stands ready to work: with you in deYeloping appropriate ordinances if that is your wislL but we belieye that the Califomia Public Records Act more than adequately addresses these issues.
Thank: you for considerlllg the' 'iews of the California Peace Officers' Association.
Sincerely.
Sam Spiegel President
California Police Chiefs Association P.o. Box 255745, Sacramento, California 95865-5745
(Office) 916-481-8000 (Fax) 916-481-8008 e-mail [email protected] web site www.cpcachiefs.org
September 17,2007
Honorable Chuck Reed Mayor ofthe City of San Jose San Jose City Hall 200 East Santa Clara Street San Jose, CA 95113
Dear Mayor Reed:
The California Police Chiefs Association has serious concerns about the proposed "Sunshine" recommendation that is slated to be considered by the San Jose City Council on September 20. The members of our organization are the primary providers ofpublic safety in California - our members provide front-line law enforcement protection for over three quarters of Californians - and we believe that a proposal such as the one you are considering will have the unintended consequence of severely compromising the fundamental public safety mission of law enforcement.
Adoption of these proposals would inevitably result in the release ofthe identities of complaining witnesses as well as those who, although not witnesses, nevertheless provided law enforcement with important information that lead to the discovery of a crime and apprehension of those responsible. This type ofpublic disclosure will not only result in retaliation and/or intimidation being visited upon these citizens, but it will have the further consequence of chilling future cooperation ofprivate citizens. It is axiomatic that successful law enforcement depends on the cooperation and assistance of law-abiding citizens, but that cooperation will evaporate if citizens believe that their identities will be accessible by those about whom they are reporting. Although it is true that the identities of some of these citizens would be revealed if they were to testify at trial, this proposal is so all-encompassing that it sweeps up virtually every name listed in any police report - whether or not the individual will ultimately be a witness in a case; whether or not a case is even fIled at all!
The California Police Chiefs Association does not believe that any public policy will be served by adoption ofthese proposals.. It is noteworthy that the City and County of San Francisco (which has in place policies similar to what is being contemplated in San Jose) has a public safety profile that is significantly less safe than the City of San Jose. We believe that the standards of California' Public Records Act - which has been tested though extensive litigation - provide sufficient standards to keep the public fully informed and still assure that the fundamental mission of public safety, the personal security and privacy of individual citizens, and the public safety ofcommunities is not compromised.
Thank you for considering the views ofthe California Police Chiefs Association.
Sincerely,
Richard Word President
· '-f1~~d ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS.· 0 Representing City and County Governments of the San Francisco Bay Area ABAG
MEMO
Date: September 21, 2007
To: All SupeNisors, Mayors, Councilmembers, Clerks of Couniy Boards of SupeNisors, Ciiy and Town Clerks, and Other Officers Having Charge of Elections in Member Jurisdictions
From: Fred Castro _~ /' /l_~ Clerk of the Board f ~~
SUbject: NOTICE OF ElECTION OF THE PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT OF THE ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS
The bylaws of the Association of Bay Area Governments (Association) provide for the election of the President and Vice President every two years. With the concurrence of the Executive Board and in accordance with election procedures adopted by the Board notice is hereby given that an election of the President and Vice President will take place in 2008.
The bylaws provide that the President and Vice President shall be elected by secret. ballot of supeNisors, mayors and councilmembers of jurisdictions belonging to the Association. Per the Association's Legal Counsel, the secret ballot provisions of the Association's bylaws for electing a President and a Vice President do not violate the Brown Act because the electors neither constitute a "body" nor fall within the Brown Act's definition of a "legislative body."
ElECTION CALENDAR
• The offices to be filled are those of the President and Vice President of the Association. The term of office for these positions begins January 17, 2008 and expires January 15, 201 O.
• Procedures for the election of President and Vice President are attached.
• The period for filing nomination pe-I-itions with the Executive Director begins immediately and ends at noon on Friday, October 12, 2007. Nomination petitions must be obtained from the Executive Director of the Association.
• Ballots will be mailed to couniy and ciiy clerks and others having charge of elections by Friday, October 19, 2007.
Mailing Address PO_ Box 2050 Oakland, California 94604-2050 (510) 464-7900 Fax (510) 464-7985 [email protected]
Location: Joseph P Bort MetroCenter 101 Eighth Street Oakland, (;ilifornia 94607-4756
2
Notice of Election September 21,2007
• Completed ballots may be filed with the Executive Director no earlier than Monday, October 22, 2007 and no later -than 12 noon on "Monday, November 5, 2007.
• Opening and counting of ballots will be conducted at 1:00 PM, Wednesday, November 7,2007 at the Association's offices.
• Pursuant to the Association's Procedures for Election of -the President and Vice President: "If, at the close of nominations, only one candidate 'has been nominated for the office of President or for the office of Vice President then such sole nominee is declared hereby to be elected to such office." A certification of election notice is to be mailed to county and city clerks and others having charge of elections by Monday, October 15, 2007.
Please direct any questions to the Clerk of the Board at (510) 464 7913.
Attachment: Procedures for Election of the President and Vice President
Cc: Henry L. Gardner, Executive Director Patricia M. Jones, Assistant Executive Director Kenneth Moy, Legal Counsel
ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS
PROCEDURES FOR ELECTION OF THE PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT
The Executive Board of the Association has adopted procedures for election of the President and Vice President of the Association. These rules are intended to govern lhe "filing of l\Jominalion Petitions, mailing and "filing of Voter Ballots, and the canvassing of Voter Ballots. The following procedures have been adopted to govern elections of the Association and shall be liberally construed.
DEFINITIONS
"Voting Member" - anyone of the following officers: Supervisor, Mayor, or City or Town Councilmember. Any action of a Voting Member taken under these Procedures (e.g., signing or circulating a petition or voting) shall be valid if the Voting Member held such office at the time of his or her acting, notwithstanding any subsequent change of status.
"Member Jurisdiction" - anyone of the counties, cities or towns wrlich are members of the Association of Bay Area Governments.
"Clerk" - the Clerk of County Board of Supervisors, City or Town Clerk, or other officer having charge of elections in a Member Jurisdid-ion.
"Voter Ballot" - ballot which will contain lhe names of the nominees for the offices of President and Vice President.
"ldentifica1-ion Envelope" - envelope which will contain the Voter Ballot as marked by the Voting Member, with the Declaration and Certification printed on its face.
"Return Envelope" - envelope which will contain signed and unsigned Identification Envelopes.
"Executive Director" - the Executive Director of the Associa-I-ion of Bay Area Governments.
"Legal Counsel" - lhe Legal Counsel of the Association of Bay Area Governments.
2
Procedures Tor Election Revised 9/1 7/92
NOMINATION
Section 1 - Basic Reference - The regulations, procedures and forms set forth in the California Election Laws shall be utilized as a basic reference unless otherwise in conflict with the Bylaws or Procedures and approved by the Legal Counsel of the Association.
Section 2 - Notice of Election - On or before the 'first·day for filing Nomina"l"ion Peti"tions, the Execu1ive Director shall mail to each Voting Member and Clerk, 1) a No"l"ice of Election and 2) a copy of the approved Procedures. The Notice shall contain a statement of:
a. The offices to be filled and the term;
b. The first and last day for filing of Nomination Petitions;
c. The first and last day for the Executive Director to mail to the Clerks the Voter Ballots;
d. The last day and time for the Executive Director to receive from the Clerk the Return Envelope containing the individuals Identification Envelopes with the enclosed Voter Ballots; and
e. The date, time and place for counting Voter Ballots.
Section 3 - Nomination Petition - Nomination Petitions for the ofFices of President and Vice President shall be substantially in the form set forth in "the Eled"ions Code and shall include -the verified statement of acceptance. Nomina"l"ion Peti-I-ion forms shall be furnished only by "the Executive Director.
Section 4 - Signature of Voting Members - Not less than fifteen nor more than twenty Voting Members shall sign the Petition. No Voting Member may sign more than one Petition for the same office, and in the event he or she does so, his or her signature shall count only on the first Petition filed which contains his or her signature.
Section 5 - Nomination for Office - Nominations shall close on the last day for filing of Nomination Petitions. If, at the close of nominations, only one candidate has been nominated for the office of President or for the office of Vice President, then such sole nominee is declared hereby to be elected to such office.
3
Procedures for Election Revised 9/1 7/92
Section 6 - Circulation of Petition - Any Voting Member may circulate a Nomination Petition. The circulator must sign a Certificate of Circulator on the Nomination Petition. The signature to each Petition shall be on the same form, and each signer shall add the date of his or her signing, his or her official title, and his or her member county, city or town. Successive signers may not use ditto marks.
Section 7 - Mailing of Ballots - The Executive Director, wi-~hin the dates prescribed in the Notice of Elec1-ion, shall mail to each Clerk one Voter Ballot and IdentiFication Envelope for each Vo-~ing Member of his or her county, city or town and one Return Envelope to return the documents to the Executive Director.
Section 8 - Voting of Ballots - Upon receipt of the items referred to in Section 7, the Clerk shall arrange to hand the Voter Ballot to each Voting Member.
Each Voting Member shall mark his or her Ballot in the presence of the Clerk but in a manner that the Clerk does not see how it is being marked. Each Voting Member shall place his or her marked Ballot in the' Identification Envelope, seal the Identification Envelope, sign the Declaration printed on the face of the Identification Envelope and hand it sealed to the Clerk before whom the Ballot is marked. The Clerk shall complete the Certification on the face of the Identification Envelope.
The Clerk shall deposit the signed Identification Envelopes in a safe place in his or her office, to be kep-~ by him or her until it is necessary to File -~he
signed and unsigned Iden-l-ifica1-ion Envelopes with '~he Executive Director in accordanc~ with the final date and -I-ime for such "filing prescribed in the Notice of EleG~ion..
Section 9 - Filing of Ballots - The Clerk shall place each signed Identification Envelope which contains a Voter Ballot from a Voting Member in the Return Envelope. The Clerk shall mail to the Executive Director the Return Envelope with enclosures, by the final date and time for such filing prescribed in the Notice of Election. -_..
No Voter Ballot shall be accepted for count by the Counting Board unless' received within the time specified in the notice of Election and unless the Declaration by the Voting Member and Certi"Fica-l-ion of the Clerk have been completed.
4
Procedures for Eleclion Revised 9/1 7/92
COUNTING AND CANVASSING OF THE VOTER BAllOTS
Section 10 - Custody of Return Envelopes - The Executive Director shall have custody of all Return Envelopes after they are received from the Clerks and until the date and time for counting of Voter Ballots.
Section 11 - Counting of Voter Ballots - The Executive Director shall co'mmence to count the voter ballots on the date, at the time and in the place specified in the Notice of Election. The Executive Director may appoint a Counting Board to assist him in counting the Voter Ballots. l\lo person who is a Voting Member shall be eligible to be appointed to the Coun'ting Board. The Coun1'ing Board shall consist of not less 'than two and not more than fo.ur per'sons. The Execu1'ive Director shall determine the form of tally sheets and shall determine necessary and required procedures to assure an accurate counting of 'the Voter Ballots.
Section 12 - Canvassing Board - A Canvassing Board shall be appointed by the President, sUbject to Executive Board confirmation, consisting of three persons who shall be voting members other than candidates for President and Vice President. A majority of this Board shall be present at all times during the counting of Voter Ballots and shall pass upon challenges of Voter Ballots, and all questions relating to the signing and certification of Identification Envelopes and the marking of Voter Ballots. The Canvassing Board further shall receive from the Executive Director the Voter Ballot tally results after completion of count by the Executive Director, and shall thereupon post the results and certify the count to the Executive Board.
Section 13 - Public Attendance - The public shall be permitted to be in attendance during the counting and canvassing of the Voter Ballots, subject only to reasonable restrid'ions issued by the Execu1ive Director to prevent interference with such counting and canvassing.
Section 14 ..., Declaration of Election - Legal Counsel shall declare elected the persons having received the highest number of votes given for the offices of President and Vice President, submit a written declaration to the President and the Executive Director, and report the results to the Executive Board at its next regular meeting. In the event of a tie, selection will be by drawing of lots.
PcAbL{~ f?ptt(Jkl e
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 0 THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the matter of the Application of) ANTENEH G. LAKEW doing business)
As paradise valley Shuttle) For authority to operate a passenger state) Corporation Between points in San Francisco) Alameda, Contra Costa, Santa Clara,) APPLICATION NO.__~_
Solano, Marin and San Mateo Counties) And the San Francisco, Oakland and) San Jose International airports and to) Establish a Zone of Rate Freedom.
Application
The application ofANTENEH G. LAKEW doing business as PARADISE VALl
shuttle here in after referred to as "applicant" respectfully states.
I
The exact name ofapplicant is ANTENEH G. LAKEW doing business as
PARADISE VALLEY Shuttle. The applicant is an individual doing business paradise VE
shuttle its principal place of business is located at:
1025 McKay Dr. # 22
San Jose, CA 95131, and its telephone numbers are
(408) 432-6202, and (408) 483-4036.
II
All notices, correspondence and communications concerning the application should be
Addressed to:
Anteneh G. Lakew 1025 McKay Dr. # 22 San Jose, CA 95131
Telephone (408) 432-6202 (408) 483-4036
m
By this application, applicant seek authority, under Section 1031~ et seq.
of the California Public Utilities Code, to provide as passenger stage corporation
an on-call, door-to-door services between points in San Francisco, Alameda,
Contra Costa, Santa Clara, Solano, Marin, and San Mateo Counties, on the one
hand, and San Francisco, Oakland, and San Jose international airports, on the
other hand. A description of the proposed services area within which applicant
will operate is attached hereto, as Exhibit "A," and by this reference made a part
hereof
Applicant also seek authority under Section 4542.2 of the Code to
establish a zone ofrate freedom ("ZORF") whereby he may assess fare which are
$10.00 above and below the fares which are $30.00 and less, as are set forth in
Exhibit "C" attached hereto and $15.00 for fares $30.00 and above, with a
minimum fare of $6.00 per adult passenger.
N
Attached hereto, as Exhibit "B," and by this reference made a part hereof,
is a map showing the points and areas proposed to be served by applicant
V
Proposed initial fares to be assessed for the transportation to be provided
under the authority sought will be in accordance with those attached hereto,
marked Exhibit "C," and by this reference made a part hereof.
VI
Appli.cant proposes to perfonn an on-call, door-to-door, twenty-four (24)
hours per day, seven (7) days a week service, passengers will be picked up and
delivered at points within the service area, described in Exhibit "B," and pickups
will he made pursuant to telephone calls received from the public for service. To
be assured of a timely scheduled service three hours advance notice for pickup
shall be required.
vn Applicant presently have available the equipment described in Exhibit
HD," attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereofand a second van
will be acquired immediately after the requested PSC authority is granted.
Application will add other units to the service after receipt of the authority and as
required to meet the public's requirements. Applicant is financially able to
acquire such units.
YIn
Applicant will have said vehicles and any other units to be acquired
covered by liability insurances in amounts of not less than those specified and
required by the Commissioner's General Order No. lOI-C.
IX
Attached hereto, marked Exhibit "E," and by this reference made a part
hereofare copies of the balance sheet ofthe applicant as ofFebruary 2,2Q07and a
pro fonna income and expense statement for the first year's operation under the
proposed authority. The pro fonna statement is submitted because applicant's
PSC service will not begin until the authority requested permitting
commencement of the service is received. However, the statement is based, in
part, upon the revenue and costs experienced in the services, which the applicant
have been conducting a through research.
X
Granting authority to perfonn the service requested by this application
will have no significant adverse effect upon the environment of the areas to be
served. On the contrary, it is believed that availability of this service will benefit
the environment and the public by a resultant reduction in the number ofprivate
vehicles required to operate over the roads and highways of the involved areas
and at the passenger loading and unloading areas of the San Jose, Oakland and
San Francisco International Airports.
XI
Public convenience and necessity require a grant of the authority
requested by the application for the following reasons:
The passenger traffic between points in San Francisco, Contra Costa, Santa Clara,
Solano, Marin, Alameda and San Mateo counties and the three Bay Area Airports
is increasing substantially as are the request for local airport transportation, and
this growth is expected to continue on the foreseeable future. Presently, annually
over 41 million passengers are passing through the San Francisco International
Airport, the fifth busiest airport in the United States, and this number is expected
to increase to over 55 million in the next ten years. The expanded utilization of
the Oakland and San Jose International Airports, percentage-wise, has exceeded
that which has been experienced at the San Francisco Airport, and this continued
growth is projected for the future. This growth has resulted in increased needs for
multi~passenger motor carrier services by the general public, due, in part, to the
massive traffic problems caused by the large volumes of private vehicles using the
streets and highways to and from the airports. Traffic congestion at these
facilities, and particularly in the loading and unloading areas, is becoming
excessive and difficult to control. These conditions, together with the increased
parking fees and the shortage of parking areas during peak travel periods have
caused large numbers of the public to seek and utilize alternative for-hire-van type
door-to-door services. Due to these problems, governmental agencies are
encouraging the public to use shuttle vans and other mUltiple capacity passenger
vehicles in an effort to reduce these highways, environmental and airport
congestion problems. A 1998 study prepared by Pacific Traffic Management
described the public's approbation of shuttle van services as "the San Francisco
Airport can rightfully boast of the highest usage ofshared-ride airport ground
services in America." Applicant's proposed service will make available a fonn of
transportation that will meet the public's needs and convenience and will assist in
reducing certain of the above~mentionedproblems. It will provide transportation
to and from all points within the requested service area, and is designed to be
more responsive to the request of the passengers originated at or destined to
residential areas, which are presently not being :fully served. An example ofthe
public's need for service to and from the airports are the 90,000 passengers
passing through the San Francisco Airport each day, of which approximately
70,000 are local and have origins of destinations within the area to be served.
Applicant will also meet the need for service that employs drivers employed, are
and will be fluent in multiple languages.
Applicant has many years ofexperience in providing transportation
services for the traveling public to and from points in the involved areas and the
airports. Anteneh G. Lakew has operated as a driver ofairport shuttles and owner
of a TCP transportation service provider company to and from the three Bay Area
airports and the proposed area to be served for over the past year. Applicant
manifestly, has the experience, knowledge, ability and means ofproviding the
transportation required by the public, and upon receipt of authority requested, will
commence the considered transportation.
XII
As justification for proposed ZORF, application state as.follows:
Section 454.2 of the Code provides that the Commission may, upon
application, establish a ZORF for any passenger stage corporation which the
Commission finds will operate in competition with substantially similar passenger
stage transportation services, or competitive transportation service from any other
transportation means, if the Commission finds that these competitive
transportation service will result in reasonable rates and changes when considered
along with the authorized zone rate freedom. Service between points in the
involved six counties and the three Bay area airports is extremely competitive,
and this condition is expected to markedly increase in the future with respect to
both service and rates. In addition to the large number of shuttle van carries
operating to and from San Francisco, Oakland and San Jose International
Airports, competing passenger services are provided by: taxicabs, limousines,
private automobiles, automobile rental agencies, public transit, charter van and
bus services, and others.
These services have a variety and wide range of fares, which are based
upon the character of services provided by each and the level ofcharges~ which
result from the extreme competition for available patronage. Further, the
commission's records show that a large number of these passenger carriers
serving the airports have applied for and have received similar authorizations with
ZORF rates ranging from $3.00 to $25.00 above and below standard tariff
charges. Applicant must be able to compete price-wise with these other carriers
and transportation means and has rate flexibility by the ZORF, which is necessary
to provide a viable public service.
XUI
Copies ofthe application have been forwarded to the public transit
operatOrs within the territory to be served by applicant and Notices as said filing
have been mailed to governmental entities and regional transportation planning
agencies described in the Certificate of Service, attached hereto, marked Exhibit
"F," and by this reference, made a part hereof.
Pursuant to Rule 87 ofthe commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure,
applicant hereby request waiver of the requirements ofRule 21 of the
Commission's Rule ofPractice and Procedure if, and to the extent thereof, that
the Notice issued by applicant may be deficient. Applicant does not believe the
Notice given of this Application is inadequate under that Rule, but through over
caution, seeks this waiver. Copies ofApplication were sent to the public transit
operators in the involved area and the Notice was served on the six involved
counties, three airports and twenty cities. Also, the Notice of the Application will
be published in the Commission's Daily Calendar, which is adequate notice to the
public for all passenger carrier application for a passenger stage corporation
certificate which is probably by oversight. The Notices provided are manifestly
adequate but, ifnecessary, applicant requests ofRule 21 to the extent required.
WHEREFORE, applicant prays that the Commission issues its order as
follows:
1. Granting by an expert order, a certificate of public convenience and necessity as
requested herein.
2.Grant authority to establish a ZORF to assess rates which are $10.00 above and
below the proposed fares which are $30.00 and less, and $15.00 for fares $21.00
and higher With minimum fare of$6.00 per adult passenger.
3.Grant applicant a waiver from the requirements ofRule 21 Of Commission's Rules
of Practice and Procedure to the extent necessary, if the Notice provided is
deemed in sufficient.
4.Granting the applicant such other and further relief as is just and proper.
Dated: September 12,2007
APPLICANT:
ANTENEH G. LAKEW
PARADISE VALLEY SHUTTLE
Anteneh G. Lakew
VERIFICAT~ON
The undersigned, an applicant in the ~bove-entit1ed matter, declares that
the statemepts in the foregoing document aI:f true ofhis own knowledge, except
as to matters, which are therein stated on infonnation and belief, and as to those , .!
matters, he pelieves them to be true, The U1l4rrsigned declares under penalty of
perjury that:the foregoing is true and correct,;
E~~futed on September 12, at San Frww~s~o, California.
..': ;~~b >?~t=--,J"' Anteneh G. LftK~~
ANTENEH G. LAKEW
PARADISE VALLY SHUTTLE
PROPOSED OPERATIl'fG AUTHORITY , ."
SECTION 1. SERVICE
Service as a passenger stage corporation providing on - call, door-to-door
service with in service area described in Section 2.
SECTION 2. SERVICE AREA DESCRIPTION
Includes all points within the geogr~phicallirnits of San Francisco, !I .
Alameda, Contra Costa, Santa Clara; Solano, Marin and San Mateo Counties and
the San Frarcisco, Oakland and San. Jose International Airports.
SECTION 3. ROUTE DESCRIPTION
Commencing at the San Jose, Oakland, and San Francisco International
Airports, then via the most convenient streets and highways to any point within
the service area described in Section 2.
EXHIBIT "A"
Anteneh G. Lflkew
PARADISE VALLY SHUTTLE
PROPOSED FARES
CONTRA COSTA ~OUNTY
To and/or from:
OAKLAND SFO SAN JOSE
Alamo Antioch Clayton Concord Crockett Danville Di ablo £1 Cerrito El Sobrante Hercules Lafayette Martinez· Moraga Orinda Pinole Pittsburg Pleasant Hill Rodeo Richmond San Pablo SanRamon Walnut Creek
40 45 60 55 75 75 45 65 6? 40 65 65 45 60 65 45 60 qO 45 60 q~ 25 35 60 35 45 65 40 45 65 35 45 60 50 65 65 40 45 65 35 45 65 35 45 65 45 65 65 40 45 60 40 45 65 35 45 60 35 45 60 40 55 60 35 45 60
MARIN COUNTY
To and/or from:
Sausalito Mill Valley Larkspur C~np Madera ~~ntfield
50 32 75 50 33 75 50 33 75 50 33 75 50 33 75
,~;f:;:.U~~~~teneh ~ Lakew) EXHIBIT "c"
MARIN COUNTY
OJ\KLAND SFO
Tiburon 50 35 Belvedere 55 35 Terra Linda 55 45 Ignacio 55 44 Novato 65 44
ALAMEDA COUNTY To and/or frpm:
Alameda 15 35 Albany 25 35 Berkeley 19 35 Berkeley-Hill 29 45 Castro Valley 25 35 Dublin 35 45 EI Cerrito 25 35 Emeryville 19 35 Fremont 39 55 Fremont-north 35 49 Hayward 30 35 Livermore 59 74 Oakland 18 35 Oakland-Hill 29 45 Piedmont 20 40 Richmond 35 45 San Leandro 20 35 San Lorenzo 22 37 Union City 39 49
SANTA CLARA COUNTY To and/or from:
Alviso 57 46 Campbell 69 45 Cupertino 69 55 Gilroy 89 85 Los Altos 59 49 Los Altos Hill 65 55 Los Gatos 59 55 Los Gatos Hills 65 55 Milpitas 55 57 Monte Sereno 56 55
~~'e-.dAnteneh G. Lakew)
SAN JOSE
75 75 7';> 75 89
65 65 79 85 50 50 65 65 35 39 45 69 59 64 55 65 45 65 49
21 24 23 49 23 28 24 28 23 24
EXIDBIT "c"
SANTA CLARA COUNTY
OAKLAND
Morgan Hill 79 Mountain View 64 Palo Alto 55 Palo Alto Hills 61 San Jose (Alameda Valley) 55 San Jose (alum Rock) 55 San Jose (Bernal/Cottle) 69 San Jose (San Carlos) 69 San Jose (Cambrian) 54 San Jose (Clayton) 69 San Jose (Downtown) 69 San Jose (East ridge Mall) 69 San Jose (Evergreen) 69 San Jose (foothill) 69 San Jose (Loyette Valley) 69 San Jose (McKee Rd) 69 San Jose (Mt. Han:i.ilton) 69 San Jose-North Great Mall 55 San Jose-south Bernal Rd. 69 San Jose-Villages 65 San Jose-Willow Glen 59 Saratoga Hills 79 San Martin 69 Santa Clara 59 Stanford 55 Sunnyvale 55
SAN MATEO To ~d/or from: AKLAND
Atherton 55 Belmont 39 Burlingame 39 MeruoPark 59 Menlo Park-Sharon Hts. 56 Millbrae 39 Redwood Ciry-1 01 54 Redwood City-Hills 54 Redwood City-Lakewood 54 Redwood City-Shore 54 Redwood City-Woodside Rd 69
SFO
77 46 34 41 55 55 65 50 45 45 55 55 55 61 45 45 55 49 54 61 55 65 69 49 41 40
SFO
49 35 21 3~
39 15 35 . 39 31 31 31
SAN JOSE
45 23 24 26 25 25 25 19 21 29 23 23 23 23 27 19 23 21 23 25 21 24 45 17 24 2~
SAN JOSE
31 36 39 26 29 39 26 29 39 41 31
San Bruno 39 49 15 San Mateo 45 18 39 San Mateo Hill 45 21 49 SFO 39
SOLANO COUNTY To and/or from:.
OAKLAND SFO SAN JOSE
Benicia 55 65 75 Chabot 65 75 85 Cordelia 65 65 85 Dixon 75 85 95 Fairfield 65 75 95 Rio Vista· 75 75 95 Rockville 75 75 95 Suisun City 65 75 95 Vacaville 75 75 95 Vallejo 55 65 75
Airport to Airport
SFO 39 49 OAKLAND 39 59 SAN JOSE 59 49
Rules Children's Fairs: Children under 8 yeats ofage must accompany an adult passenger
and shall ge charged one-haif(1/2) the applicable full fare. (Prices are subject to change.)
percent (90~)ofthe full fare upon request. Senior Fares: Senior Citizens (persons over 65 years of age) shall be charged ninety
Baggage f~res: Skies, golf bags, footlockers, surfboards, bicycles, boxes and cartons: $5.0pper Piece. Extra suitcases or bags (2 allowed): $4.00 per piece.
~~ (AnteI1eh /. . LBkew) =-
EXHffiIT "C"
Rules and regulations:
1. Fares are for one-way trips and apply to pr from points named. 2. Fares to points not named which are interme4iate to named points shall be the
same as the next most distant named point from point :of origin. 3. In addition to the applicable point-to-point far~s, ':for services to an authorized
point beyond any named point shall be charg~d,$15.00in addition to the prescribed tariff fare. .: '
4. Fares shall apply to each passenger. However, a "passenger group" shall be charged one full fare and $8.00 for the second and eapp additionaJ passenger. A "passenger group" is a group that makes a single resefY~tion for transportation from a single origin to a single destination. 'j;" , .: '
5. A free standby time of 15 minutes shalllw aUOweq for ~a,FP. pickup. After that time, a charge of $7.50 for each 15 minutes or fraction t4erePf shall be assessed. Time shall commence from the agreed reservatio~ tim{pfvfp¢n the van arrives at pickup point, whichever is later. . ,. .,' " ,
6. A surcharge of$10.00 will be added to tlW f~n~~s~s~r4 for any trip starting between 11:00 P.M. and 5:00 A.M.' l"!'. ".'
~ (Antenel:f~. Lakew)
~ T
EXHIBIT "c'
ANTENEH G. L~W
PARADISE VALLEYI~~VTTLE
Vehicle List ;!
Year Make Model Passengers capacity
Vehicles identification f!
2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor 7 ;4A4MM21S76E040842
EXIllBIT '~P"
ANTENEH G. LAKEW
PARADISE VALLEY SHUTTLE I
Balance S~fet
February 12T2007
Assets Cash in bank and hand $10,000.00 Vehicles $25,000.00
Total Assets $35,000.00
Liabilities Bank Mortgage $00,000.00 Credit Cards $7,000.09.
Net Worth $28,000.00
Total Liability and Net Worth $28,000.00
EXIDBIT "E"
ANTENEH G. LAKEW
PARADISE VALLY~IfVTTLE . . I
PRO-FORMA INCOME STAT~MENT ...'
FIRST YEAR OF OPERAIfPN
INCOME I
Gross receipts: $45,000.00 Other receipts: _------"0'-"-0.:..;:.0-"-0
Total Income: $45,000.00
Expenses:
Telephone $1,100.00 Office Expenses and supplies $ 600.00 Gas and oil $5,600.00 Auto parts and supplies $1,500.00 Radios/Communication $ 800.00 Parking and tolls $ 775.00 Postage $ 100.00 Taxes and licenses $ 995.00 Maintenance- and repair $ 1,125.00
Airport Fees $ 1,450.00 :PUC Fees $ 219.00
$ 5,250.00 ~~svr~c~ Accotintmg $ 525.00
TOTAL EXPENSES: $ 20,154.00
NET PROFIT: $ 24, 846.00
;~?a<~ (Anteneh G. Lakew)
EXHIBIT "E"
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I herby certifY that I have lived in California State for many years, and my address is 1025 McKay Dr. #22~San Jose, CA 95131. On September 12,2007 I served within Application on the following named public transit operators and Notices of said filing, a copy of which is attached hereto, on all the named city and county govemmental agencies, regional planning agencies and airports by depositing same, enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at San Francisco, California.
I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at San Francisco, California, September 12,2007
Executive' ' San Francisco International Airport Metropolitan Transportation Commission P.O. Box 8097 Metro Center Sal) Francisco, CA 94128 10I_8th Street Oakland, CA 94607
AC Transit San Jose International Airport 1600 Franklin Cunningham Avenue Oakland, CA 94501 Jose, CA 95148-1001
Oeneral Manager OaIqand mtemational Airport Municipal Railway Port of Oakland City and County of San Francisco P.O. Box 2064 949 Presidio Avenue Oakland, CA 94064
San Francisco, CA 94115
Clerk of the City and Goldep. Gate TranSit District Cpunty of San Francisco 1011 Anderson Drive CitY Hall, Room 317 San Rafael, CA 94913 40q Van Ness Avenue
S~A941.02 . . ~teneh G.Lakew) :PXlIIBIT "F"
County of Santa Clara
County Clerk San Jose, CA 95113 191 No. First Street San Jose, CA 95113
City Manager City ofPalo Alto 250 Hamilton Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94301
City Clerk City of Santa Clara 1500 Warburton Avenue Santa Clara, CA 95050
City Clerk City of San Jose 801 N. First Street, room 116 San Jose, CA 95110
County of Alameda
.County Clerk _ County ofAlameda 1225 Fallon Street Oakland, CA 94612
City Clerk City of Oakland 505 lith Street,
ptyManager City of Berkeley 2120 Milvia
City I\1anager City ofPleasanton 777 B Street Hayward, CA 94541
County of Contra Costa County Clerk Contra Costa County 1020 Ward Martinyz,CA 9455
City Manager City ofWalnut Creek 1666 N. Main Street Walnut Creek, CA 94596
City Manager City ofRichmond 2600 8arrette Avenue Richmbnd, CA 94804
City manager City of Concord 1950 ~ark Side Drive
I
Concord, CA 94519
County ofMartin County Clerk County of Marine Room 609 P.O. Box E San Rafael, CA 94913
City Clerk City ofNovato
Berkeley, CA 94704 901 Shennan Avenue Novato, CA 94045
City Manager City of Alameda City Clerk 2263 Santa Clara Avenue City of Sausalito Alameda, CA 94501 420 Litho
k-! A_ ~ ._ fL _ , Sausalito, CA 94904 ~g;J~ (Anteneh G. Lakew) EXHIBIT "F" City q~rlc
r,tty qf till ~ftf~e1S,:
CItY ff n '" San R~~~l, ~A 94904
County of Solano County of San Mateo
City Clerk City ofFairfie1d County Clerk lOQO Webster-Street COWlty of San. Ma.teQ Fairfield, CA 94533 400 County Cmters
Redwood City, CA 94063 City of Vacaville 650 Merchapt Street City Clerk Vacaville, CA 95688 City ofSan Mateo
330 West 20th Avenue City Clerk San Mateo, CA 94403 City ofVallejo P. O. Box 3066 City Clerk ofBurlingame Vallejo, CA 94585 501 primroses
Burlingame, CA 94010 County Clerk COWlty of Sola.no Ciry- Q S\Ji$llD 580 Texas Street 101 Civic Centers Blvd. Fairfield, CA 94533 Suisun, CA 94585
(Anteneh G. Lakew) EXHIBIT "F"
NOTICE
Qn September 12,2007 (U1 :;tpplic(U1t ofAnt~n~h G, Lc;!,k~w PARADISE VALLEY SHUTTLE was filed with the California Public Utilities Commission, selYking a passenger stage corporation certificate to perform an on-call, door-todoor service on 24-hours per day, seven days per week basis between points in SM Fr(U1cisco, Alwn~da, Contra Cosw, SMta. Clara, SOIMO, Marin Md San Mateo Counties, on the one hand, and the San Francisco, Oakland, and San Jose International Airports, on the other hand. The service will be performed over the most convenient routes between the airports and points oforigin and destinations within th~ propos~d s~rvic~ area. Th~ initial service will be provided with two
. shuttle vans with additional vans to be added upon receipt of requested authority. The proposed fares to be assessed the public for this service is set forth in Exhibit "c" ofthe Application. A copy of the Application and related exhibits will be furnished by applicant up on receipt ofa written request for such document. Please direct the request to PARADISE VALLEY SHUTTLE, 1025 McKay Dr. #22,San Jose, CA 9513 1.
(This Notice is issued pursuant to Rule 2I(k) of the commission's rules of practice and procedure.)
(Anteneh G. Lakew) EXIllBIT "G"
From: Joanne Benjamin [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2007 12:41 PM To: 'Russell Hancock'; 'Carl Guardino'; [email protected]; Andrea M. Chelemengos; Angelita Salvador; Ann Sullivan; Cathleen Boyer; Donna Rogers; Gail T. Borkowski; Heidi Kirk
. (Heidi Kirk); Irma Torrez; Janet Tabuno; Judy Smith (Smith, Judy); Karen Jost; Kim Fettahlioglu; Kimberly Smith (Kimberly Smith); 'Lee Price'; Linda Lagergren; Lisa Lewis; Lynda Seastrom; Mary Lavelle; Patsy Garcia; Phyllis Perez; Rhonda Hadnot; Rosalinda Perez; Shawna Freels; Susan Kitchens; Tina West; 'Wanda Wong'; Yolanda Lopez; Yvette Agredano; AI Pinheiro; AI Pinheiro (Pinheiro, AI); Craig Jones; Daniel Furtado (Furtado, Daniel E.); David Baxter (David Baxter); David Casas; Greg Sellers; Jennifer Sparacino; Joe Pirzynski; Joe Pirzynski; Jose Esteves; Judy Kleinberg; Kathleen King; Kris Wang; Laura l\1acias; Otto O. Lee; Patricia M. Mahan; Pierluigi Oliverio; Ronald Packard; Sam Liccardo; Steve Tate; Yoriko Kishimoto; Barbara Spector; Dean J. Chu; Dolly Sandoval; Don Perry; Larry Klein; Peter Arellano; Tom Means; William Kennedy Cc: 'ofcarchive' Subject: Call for applications: Climate Protection Grants
Palo Alto Mayor Yoriko Kishimoto is one of the Cities Association's representatives to the Bay Area Air Quality Management District Board of Directors. As our representative, she would like our cities and partners to have the information below on a brand-new grant program from the air district. Please circulate this information to the appropriate people in each of your cities. Thank you.
Joanne Benjamin, Executive Director Santa Clara County Cities Association 505 W. Olive Avenue Suite 749, Sunnyvale, CA 94086 Telephone (408) 730-7770 Fax (408) 736-2014
Here's info on the brand-new grant program from the air district. Please take a look!
http://www.baaqmd.gov/pln/climate.protectiongrantprogram.htm
The Air District's Climate Protection Grant Program will provide grants to local governments, schools, non-profit organizations and small businesses within the Bay Area for projects designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Download grant program guidelines and application forms.
Proposals must be submitted by 5:00 pm on Friday, November 9, 2007,
The Air District contact person for the Climate Protection Grant Program is: Abby Young [email protected] (415) 749-4754
PUBLIC WORKSHOPS FOR POTENTIAL APPLICANTS:
DATE PLACE TIME Monday, October 1 San Jose City Hall 9:00 am to 11:00 am Wing Rooms 118-119-120 200 East Santa Clara St . San Jose
Wednesday. Oct. 3 MTC Auditorium 3:00 pm to 6:00 pm 101 Eighth Street Oakland
Friday, October 5 Santa Rosa City Hall 2:00 to 5:00 pm Council Chambers 100 Santa Rosa Ave Santa Rosa
Yoriko Kishimoto Mayor of Palo Alto 650-323-5590 [email protected]
From: Joanne Benjamin [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, September 23, 20075:23 PM To: [email protected]; Andrea M. Chelemengos; Angelita Salvador; Ann Sullivan; Cathleen Boyer; Donna Rogers; Gail T. Borkowski; Heidi Kirk (Heidi Kirk); Irma Torrez; Janet Tabuno; Judy Smith (Smith, Judy); Karen Jost; Kim Fettahlioglu; Kimberly Smith (Kimberly Smith); 'Lee Price'; Linda Lagergren; Lisa Lewis; Lynda Seastrom; Mary Lavelle; Patsy Garcia; Phyllis Perez; Rhonda Hadnot; Rosalinda Perez; Shawna Freels; Susan Kitchens; Tina West; 'Wanda Wong'; Yolanda Lopez; Yvette Agredano Cc: Lisa Rose; [email protected]; 'Patricia Jones'; 'ofcarchive' Subject: City Selection Committee Thursday, Oct. 11: 3 appointments to be made at the meeting
Dear Clerks and Council Secretaries:
Please distribute to your council members and appropriate staff the (four) attached documents concerning three upcoming appointments to positions on regional level boards and commissions. The Santa Clara County Cities Association City Selection Committee will make the appointments to these positions at its October 11 meeting which will be held at 6:45 pm at the Sunnyvale City Hall.
I have attached the job descriptions for each of the appointments.
The appointments will be for the following: A) Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission (RWRC) - Member-at-Large; Term expires January 2009 B) Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Executive Board - Alternate Representative; Term expires June 2008 C) Bay Conservation and Development Nomination for the South Bay
Patrick Kwok, Cupertino Vice Mayor, has resigned from the Cupertino City Council due to his appointment to the Santa Clara Valley Water District Board. Patrick has therefore also resigned from two regional boards that he was appointed to by the City Selection Committee. Patrick served as a member-at-Iarge on the RWRC. This appointment can be for any elected council member from a city not already having a representative on the commission. I have attached the current roster for you. The other position that Patrick held was the alternate representative to the ABAG Executive Board.
The ABAG Executive Board has invited the Santa Clara County Cities Association City Selection Committee to submit a nomination to
fill an ABAG representative position on the BCDC. The Cities of Mountain View, Palo Alto, San Jose, and Sunnyvale are eligible to submit
nominees for the South Bay representative position. The term begins January 1, 2008. The elected official selected will represent South Bay
municipalities on BCDC. An interview will be scheduled with the nominee prior to recommendation to the ABAG Executive Board for
appointment. The appointment will be made at the November Executive Board meeting. For your information, Vice Mayor Bob Wieckowski of
Fremont currently serves as alternate to Councilmember Dena Mossar of Palo Alto who will be leaving office at the end of the year.
Please ask any interested council members to contact me with their letter or email of intent to be appointed so that I may add their names to the Oct. 11 agenda~
Thank you, Joanne
Joanne Benjamin, Executive Director Santa Clara County Cities Association 505 W. Olive Avenue Suite 749, Sunnyvale, CA 94086 Telephone (408) 730-7770 Fax (408) 736-2014
Authority:
Meetings:
Stipend:
Term of Appointment:
Attendance:
Reporting Requirements:
For More Information:
JOB DESCRIPTION
Recycling and Solid Reduction Commission of Santa Clara County
The Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission is the principal advisory body to city councils and the Board of Supervisors on countywide solid waste planning issues and the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan.
4th Wednesday of every even-numbered month at 5:15 p.m.
$50 per meeting
The term of office of each commission member shall be six years and the number of terms shall be limited to two terms. North County Cities representative: One city council member from Cupertino, Los Altos or Los Altos Hills West Valley Cities representative: One city council member from Campbell, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno or Saratoga Central County Cities representative: Orie city council member from Milpitas or Santa Clara SMaRT Station Cities representative: One city council member from Mountain View, Palo Alto or Sunnyvale South County Cities representative: One city council member from Gilroy or Morgan Hill Member-at-Iarge: Two city council members to serve as members-at-Iarge. Members-at-Iarge shall be drawn from any city that does not already have a representative on the commission.
Three consecutive absences are sufficient grounds to warrant the Chairperson to request a replacement.
City Selection appointees present quarterly written reports to the Board of Directors of the Cities Association regarding relevant activities. One appointee of the Committee is also required to report to the Board of Directors of the Cities Association at least one a regularly scheduled meeting during the course of each year. Committee members will also be expected to report to the specific cities they represent.
Lisa Rose (408) 282-3166
JOB DESCRIPTION
Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Executive Board
The Association of Bay Area Governments was established in 1961 and is the oldest Council of Governments in California. ABAG is the designated regional planning agency for the San Francisco Bay Area and its meinbers include all nine counties and 100 cities in the region. Representatives and alternates from member cities within each county are appointed by the county conference of mayors of member cities. In Santa Clara, the appointing body is the City Selection Committee of the Santa Clara County Cities Association.
Authority: The ABAG Executive Board implements the policies established by the General Assembly; the Board is responsible for the agency's operations and reviews and acts on recommendations from ABAG committees.
Meetings: 3rd Thursday of each month, 7:30 p.m.; Oakland Metro Center
Stipend: $100.00 per meeting; maximum of 48 meetings per year
Term of Appointment: ABAG Executive Committee members serve for
two years. Term ends June 30, 2008. The City Selection Committee appoints two Executive Board representatives and two alternate representatives.
Reporting Requirements: The City Selection appointees· present quarterly
written reports to the Board of Directors of the Cities Association regarding relevant activities. Each of the ABAG Executive Board appointees is also requested to orally report to the Board of Directors of the Cities Association at least once during the course of each year.
For more Information: Patricia Jones (510) 464-7933
JOB DESCRIPTION
San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission
Authority:
Meetings:
Stipend:
Term of Appointment:
Reporting Requirements:
For more Information:
(BCDC)
The 27-member BCDC was created by the California Legislature in 1965 in response to broad public concern over the future of San Francisco Bay. The Commission, made up of appointees from several local governments and state/federal agencies, is charged with regulating and protecting the San Francisco Bay.
First and third Thursdays of each month at 1:00 p.m. Meeting locations alternate between the East Bay and San Francisco.
$100.00 per meeting.
The Santa Clara County Cities Association City Selection Committee is invited to submit a nomination to fill an ABAG representative position on the BCDC. The Cities of Mountain View, Palo Alto, San Jose, and Sunnyvale are eligible to submit nominees for the South Bay representative position. The term begins January 1, 2008. The elected official selected will represent South Bay municipalities on BCDC. An interview will be scheduled with the nominee prior to recommendation to the ABAG Executive Board for appointment. The appointment will be made at the November Executive Board meeting.
A City Selection Committee nominated Commissioner is requested to present written reports to the Board of Directors of the Cities Association regarding relevant activities of the BCDC, and to report to the Board of Directors of the Cities Association at at least one regularly scheduled meeting during the course of each year.
Patricia M. Jones Assistant Executive Director, ABAG Phone: (510) 464-7933 Email: [email protected] Website: www.bcdc.ca.gov
County of Santa Clara RECYCLING AND WASTE REDUCTION COMMISSION OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY Environmental Resources Agency Department of Agriculture and Resource Management Integrated Waste Management Division
1553 Berger Drive, Bldg. 1 San Jose, California 95112 (408) 282-3180 FAX (408) 282-3188 www.ReduceWaste.org
Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission of Santa Clara County
Mission
The Commission's mission is to conserve, protect and preserve the environmental resources of our community through advocacy, education and outreach programs; to reuse, reduce, recycle and intelligently dispose of waste materials; and to promote composting, pollution and waste prevention and sustainable living practices for all the people in Santa Clara County.
Commissioners for 2007
Revised 8/23/07
Commissioners Representing
Kansen Chu, City of San Jose City of San Jose
Jose Esteves, City of Milpitas Central County Cities (Milpitas, Santa Clara)
Steve Glickman, Town of Los Gatos West Valley Cities (Campbell, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno,
Saratoga)
John Howe, City of Sunnyvale, Chair SMaRT Station Cities (Mountain View, Palo Alto, Sunnyvale)
Patrick Kwok, SCVWD Santa Clara Valley Water District
Pete McHugh, County of Santa Clara County of Santa Clara
Jamie McLeod, City of Santa Clara, Vice-Chair Member-at-Large (All Jurisdictions)
Dolly Sandoval, City of Cupertino North County Cities (Cupertino, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills)
Roland Velasco, City of Gilroy South County Cities (Gilroy, Morgan Hill)
Vacant Member-!lt-Large (All Jurisdictions)
Commissioners: John Howe, Chair; Kansen Chu, Jose Esteves, Steve Glickman, Patrick Kwok, Pete McHugh, Jamie McLeod, Dolly Sandoval, Roland Velasco