Case # 619FSignificance & Compatibility

Review111 Redwood

Presented By: Jason LutzCommunity Development Services Director

City Council MeetingAgenda Item # 7

May 9, 2016

CASE NO. 619F Consider a request of Bobo Custom Builders,

applicant, representing Debra Nason, owner,for the significance and compatibility reviewof the proposed replacement structurelocated at 111 Redwood St under DemolitionReview Ordinance No. 1860 (April 12, 2010)in order to demolish and/or encapsulate 42%of the street-facing façade on the east side ofthe existing main structure for a master suiteaddition.

SUMMARY The applicant is seeking to demolish

and/or encapsulate 42% of the street-facing façade for the addition of amaster suite.

4

BACKGROUND

The property is zoned SF-A and islocated on the north side of RedwoodSt., between Henderson St. andAshcroft Ave.

5

PROJECT LOCATION

6

POLICY ANALYSISLOT COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSED

Lot Area 11,927 11,927Main House Footprint 1,746 2,159Front Porch 135 135Side Porch 1 0 137Side Porch 2 0 0Rear Porch 0 0Garage Footprint 0 0Carport Footprint 0 270Shed(s) Footprint 0 0Breezeways 0 0Covered Patio Structure 0 0Other Accessory Structures 240 240Lot Coverage / Lot Area 2,121/11,927 2,804/11,927Total Lot Coverage (Max 40%) 18% 24%

7

POLICY ANALYSIS

FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) EXISTING PROPOSEDLot Area 11,927 11,927Main House 1st Floor 1,746 2,159Main House 2nd Floor 0 0Garage 1st Floor 0 240Garage 2nd Floor 0 0Other Structures 240 270FAR / Lot Area 1,986/11,927 2,669/11,927Total FAR (45% or 50% with bonus) 17% 22%

8

POLICY ANALYSIS

The proposed structure is 18’ in height(max allowed 35’) as measured fromaverage grade.

The proposed structure addition complieswith all regulations concerning setbacks,height, and looming standards.

9

POLICY ANALYSIS

The proposed structure addition will havean exterior comprised of wood siding tomatch the existing material.

The proposed roof will be comprised of acomposition shingle roof

The existing 1,746 sq. ft. home was builtin 1938 according to the Bexar CountyAppraisal District.

10

EXISTING SITE PLAN

11

PROPOSEDSITE PLAN

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

ARB RECOMMENDATION

On May 3, 2016 the Architectural ReviewBoard considered the request.

Found no significance in the existingstructure.

Found the proposed replacement structureto be compatible.

Recommended approval of the request aspresented.

22

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Postcards were mailed to property owners

within a 200-foot radius of the property,appropriate notice was posted on the Citywebsite and a sign was posted on theproperty

Responses received:

Support: (3)

Oppose: (1)

QUESTIONS?